LANDING ABOUT 0 / 0 VISIBILITY

[Turner9090]

That's a short rnw and he floated

[billnye555]

i'd say 600ft visibility

[AeroflySimDE]

300ft visibility, that is not 0 visibility :-).

Anyway, thanks for the video. :D

[kibz2005]

hahaha, i love how airbuses call you a retard to remind you to flare :D

(for anybody who wants to hate, please i am just kidding i know that means retard the power)

[jucano]

just saw the runways at minimus.

[MajSobbero]

3:06 wtf is the computer saying retard retard retard lmao

[GreatWhite85]

0/0 my ass

[cuboperu]

The pilot is talking about Flight Simulator Hahahahah Nice ! xD

[martinbeckthefirst]

play nyce everyone don't make me come up there ! I'm not a real pilot ( microsoft flyt sym ) but that was an excellent landing in my ' umble opinion .

[fmsgpp]

this is a CAT I and the RVR is about 1500

[hibsfan1875]

reeetard reeetard haha

[sarmad6648]

retard retard retard ,,, wat r u doin man ??? laaaaaaaaaaaaaaanding

[piotreyjsky]

where is 0 / 0 VISIBILITY

[mrf12016]

Jajaja que era, Interjet??? Buen video

[foxtrot789]

Do you know what "0/0" means? Cause that's certainly not "zero" anything. There was gobs of visibility.

[sghost77]

@foxtrot789 DO YOU READ WHAT I WRITE'?? I AM NOT APILOT 4 ME IS NOT  VISIBILITY....

[TAREK3691]

@sghost77 LOL very nice comment ^^

[onaokashi]

@sghost77 Where did you landing?...NIce video MEXICANA AIRLINES COME BACK!!!

[ThePilot314]

@foxtrot789

You are right!

VISIBILITY 0/0 was wrong.

AND the crew flew the most of the approach with AP!!!!!!

[tunkunrunk]

@foxtrot789 why people thumb up ? I agree , before getting above the runway we couldn't see a thing

[thevas1]

That doesn't count for crap, 0/0 visibility means you will not see a single detail while landing, whereas there was just a heavy cloud ceiling here.

[afgrocks123]

@foxtrot789 from 0 to 100 feet ceiling, it is counted as zero, and from 0 to 50 feet, horizintal visibility, it is also count as zero. Don't post crap if you are ignorant..

[scoopsoahu]

0 vis? thats weak........ they had plenty of vis right where they needed it the most.. try reaching mins with an xwind and still wondering where the f%$k everything is.....

[Weltbevoelkerung]

The absolute minimum RVR for an ILS CATIIIb approach is 75 metres.^^

[sghost77]

@Weltbevoelkerung i am not a pilot yet... when i tape this...for it was for me no visibility... sorry ... about that

[Weltbevoelkerung]

@sghost77

Yeah, no problem, I know.

Was just for information. ;)

[leyva1998]

nice landing!

[ntqt75]

RVR 2kms?

[ntqt75]

Sure this is not 0/0

[navajopa31]

I did this for 33 years. I would say 300 and a 1/2 mile vis.

[sid77777]

loads of visibilty....

[nyczumazooma]

Accent, Texas ATC?



[qtr7]

visibility -1 / -1

Visibility my ass

[beergut111]

this is stupid.....its 300ft ceiling and at least 1 mile vis....thats childs play.

[sghost77]

@beergut111 damm it.. i told that i am not a pilot.. so for me ... is not visibility..... got it???

[Calabam19]

@beergut111 and you're flying what A/C?

[beergut111]

@Calabam19 retired 747 captain from Northwest airlines.....what are you flying?

[sghost77]

@beergut111  I AM NOT.... IS AN AIRBUS 320 OF EX MEXICANA AIRLINES..

[MrGarcia2703]

@beergut111 hahaha fucking gringos they think they're the only ones capable of landing an airplane

[beergut111]

@MrGarcia2703 well, gringos invented all of it.....so, they do know more than the rest.

[tholve]

Is this San Jose? And this doesn't look like 0 zero visibility

[Krulle27]

Wow...!!! Now that's low visibility!!!!!!

[pachodomi]

thats not 0/0

[daspidrr]

flagging this video for misleading title.... i'm really looking for cat III app with very low or nil visibility, and you put an approach that a cessna would've done with standard inst...... just change the title already!

[sghost77]

@daspidrr HI I AM NOT A PILOT... SORRY IF I NAME INCORRECTLY THIS VIDEO.. REGARDS FROM MEXICO

[daspidrr]

@sghost77 no hay problema, de hecho el video es muy bueno pero si esta mal etiquetado.... tienes muchos videos muy buenos, espero ver otro pronto con este tipo de aproximaciones! un saludo desde toluca

[sghost77]

@daspidrr saludos y bueno creo ke alla llego un cargo lux 747 de los nuevos..... igual y tu lo puedes grabar.....!!

[88TheHeat88]

@daspidrr I was looking for CAT IIIC....

[operationcwaI789789]

Politically correct approach computer-call-outs in the future maybe? "Retard, Retard, Retard" ROFLMAO

[fidelkr1]

Dear sghost77 you are right, far from a CAT II and even farther than a CAT III app moreover captain`s left hand should have been on side stick and not over the glareshield during the landing roll

[juanser2008]

hahaha 50 40 30 2010 RETARD! RETARD! RETARD!!!! LOL

[CreQ]

lol@'about 0/0 visibility' yea 100%!!

[mucciaprada]

Good landing however not a CAT-III either. the visibility was ok to make decision.

[svscared]

What airport was this? Good job!

[Navahoagm63]

Yea, the pilots didnt really land the plane. They were probably flying IFR, and landing with the ILS. Simply meaning the plane basically lands itself and all the pilots do is control flaps. ILS is, again, simple. Get the runway FREQ and put the freq into the NAV1 or NAV2 box. Then when cleared for landing turn on APP and switch the FREQ to active. Now u simply sit back and relax.

[ryanhaart]

@Navahoagm63 You are talking out of your ass. Autopilot is disengaged at 2:45

[xXGETR0CKEDxX]

@Navahoagm63 What the hell are you talking about ? Switch to the Runway Frequency ?? Runways are asphalt they dont have Frequencies.... Localizers have Frequencies..... And it is very clear the AP was turned off at mins this was not a auto-land

[davidleg]

que buen video, esperemos que no quibre la linea y siga siendo la vieja es este emisferio

[scozzahisee]

retard... retard... retard... retard... lmao

[AcepilotC172]

what type of plane is this????????

[sghost77]

airbus 320

[aavgoustis]

EXCELENT aviation technology as well :) don't forget...

[larrybueno]

IT´S AN ILS CAT 1

[LethalHobo]

I dont like how the plane insults you every time you land

[ponyjared7]

@LethalHobo lol 50-40-30-20-10 RETARD RETARD 5

[woarboar]

He might have had Zero vis at altitude but he had at least 550m RVR and he could have had 200ft minimums easily. Not even a CAT II

[sghost77]

sorry i am not a pilot i think i was.. ....regards..

[ggurza]

@woarboar I dont know if you noticed, but the gpws calls the 500 ft and the runway was not in sight... it calls the 300 ft and the head of the runway starts to appear, but just a little bit... so he must have had an RVR of 300 ft, so that clearly makes it a CAT II landing

[cst1908]

ils landing huh can someone make video 0 visibility landing +manual landing in fsx???

[Magicpianoteacher]

ILS ??

[traderjoe1300]

Instrument Landing System. That is a type of precision landing approach which includes both linear guidence (alligned with the runway) and vertical guidence (glide slope) so that the pilot can follow the instrumentation all the way down to the runway without visual reference.

[sethch53]

That was an awesome video=)

[traderjoe1300]

seems to be a basic ILS approach to minumums, which in US is 200/1/2. The airplane was right at 200 when the approach environment became visible allowing the pilot to decend only another 100 ft without the runway itself being in sight. Just before 100 ft, you could clearly see the components defined as the end of the runway.

[sghost77]

thanks for explain.. regards from mexico  sghost77

[JCP598]

Instead of criticizing every tiny detail about if it was RVR 300 or 301 you should be glad that someone posts such great videos.

Just enjoy!

[nullakilenc]

RVR 2km...

[sghost77]

no  idea whats that.... i am not a pilot... jajajaja

[beergut111]

"LANDING ABOUT 0 / 0 VISIBILITY"

lol......there goes about 4 minutes of my life ill never get back.

[beergut111]

ah the aviation experts at youtube....some of the best.....at knowing exactly shit about nothing.

[jumpseat2024]

..the best ones are the microsoft flight sim guys that think they know everything about everything...I've seen a lot of word vomit of them just throwing stuff together that makes absolutely no sense haha

[beergut111]

agreed.

[sghost77]

i love the coment knowing exactly shit about nothing!!! regards from mexico!! sghost77

[Wrahns]

Aerobaby4u hasnt got a clue, firstly they are flying an Airbus that doesnt have a Yoke, it has a sidestick and RaduGe was correct in that the "Retard Retard" Aural alert is for the throttles to be brought to Idle prior to Touchdown.

[albarood14]

this is more than 400 meter visibilty

[sghost77]

as i said i am not a pilot sorry

[carnivalpride]

This is now a mystery. shost77 ere un piloto o trabajas para Mexicana?

[sghost77]

I JUST HAVE LUCK!

[84velo]

0/0 My ass! You obviously have never seen 0/0. That's like 200 and 1/2.

[sghost77]

0/0 your ass??? yes you give it 4 free jajajaj dont you read???

[JTJ03M]

aaaaaaaaaaaaa su!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! mexicana de aviacion.. sin duda de los mejores pilotos de mexico.. que orgullo ver a mi gente tan exitosa!!!

[sghost77]

si soy los mejores pilotos de mexico.. saludos

[FireFighterrock24]

omg i would swear that controler works Norcal Approach

[sghost77]

sorry iam not a pilot what is norcal aproach?? so every body understand? thanks , regards from mexico sghost77

[FireFighterrock24]

NorCal (Northern California) Approach/Departure is the approach Traycon that handles the majority of the airspace from around Modesto to the top of California

[jmr604]

So you stole the video then.

[sghost77]

stole?? u thinks so??

[jmr604]

Maybe, I just find it odd that you are in a cockpit during an approach and you don't seem to know what's going on in your video.

[sghost77]

dude i dont have to , i just enjoy the view... regards sghost77

[jmr604]

Are you a flight attendant?

[wilfredotour2]

3:5 RETARD,RETARD,RETARD!!!,lol,th­ats funny

[sghost77]

and olso it look very cool in the cabin.... regards.. from mexico sghost77

[gabiure]

Nice landig, but as Nicola said, the visibility is not 0... I think is at keast 1000m

[sghost77]

i am not a pilot for me was no visibility but you are the ones who knows thaks 4 writing. regards from mexico

[FireFighterrock24]

in the aviation world we use feet and miles

[sghost77]

no se la verdad.. pero a veces aterrizan con muy pero muy poca visibilidad no se que categoria tienen pero son bien chingones nuestros pilots los mejores.. saludos sghost77

[lsomex]

CAT II, van por la CAT III incluso para Autoland, en verdad muy buenos los pilotos

[americanblues05]

Hey!! Oye excelente video, no sabes si los aviadores de MXA estan calificados con Low Vis? Osease CAT II o III?

[SIGMUNPILOT]

@americanblues05 Aqui en Mexico, solo los pilotos y las aeronaves de Interjet y Volaris tienen la capacidad para CAT II y CAT III y solo MMTO esta equipado para estos aterrizajes

[SIGMUNPILOT]

@americanblues05 Aqui en Mexico, solo los pilotos y las aeronaves de Interjet y Volaris tienen la capacidad para CAT II y CAT III y solo MMTO esta equipado para estos aterrizajes. Los demas aeropuertos "grandes" estan equipados con ILS CAT I y los mas pequeños solo tienen aproximaciones y aterrizajes VOR

[AMT4245]

HAHAHAHA at 3:08 it sounds like its saying RETARD RETARD RETARD RETARD

[RaduGe]

It does say Retard, but that means "retard the throttles", as in bring the throttle to idle.

[AeroBaby4u]

it means pull the yoke back so the back wheels touch down first... hahahahahahahaha so there u go learn how to fly

[birudagmawi1]

no, it does mean bring throttles to idle.

[spikey115]

Well, considering this is an Airbus A318/319/320, there is no yoke! This plane has a sidestick! What you are describing is a flare, and "retard" does not mean "flare", it means retard engines to idle.

[CharLieTj]

Amazing video!

Thanks for uploading

[sghost77]

thanks for writings.. regards from mexico

[Nikola16789]

It's not 0 visibility...but, very good landing

[sghost77]

as i said iam not a pilot, but 4 me it was simple amazing the pilots job... regards thanks for writing

[wheaterar]

Airbus A320 Fronteir.

[sghost77]

MEXICANA... MEXICANA PLISSSSS

[mcervantes]

FO-como que quiere a abrir o no? CAP-no nada FO-nada? CAP-nada! CAP-no, no quiere abrir ni maiz caon! FO-500 pies CAP-se empieza a medio ver el piso CAP-siguete siguete siguete GPWS-(100 above) CAP-siguete siguete GPWS-(300) FO-continue CAP-luces a la vista CAP-y ahora si como es vamonos... por que aqui es como el simulador caon FO-si verdad? CAP-siii te la cierran y poooota!!

[Tovkal]

Que avión es?

[sghost77]

hola  es un airbus 320

[triplesevenman]

0 visibility? bat for me the visibility in final is good!

[sghost77]

u r right iam not the pilot thats just my impretion about the weather and the visibility any way its just 4 entretaiment

[padavalos]

¿ En donde fué el aterrizaje ?

Saludos desde QET

[outlaws831]

KSJC

[sghost77]

hola gracias por escribir... el aterrizaje fue en san jose california usa  saludos

[outlaws831]

Do you have any from Leon, GTO (BJX)

[sghost77]

as soon as i tape it one i am load the video here regards from mex

[Tovkal]

Thath's isn't 0 visibility. Almost 1000 m

[sghost77]

so?? how do u call that?