Added: 4 years ago
From: hiroshima2007
Views: 170,490
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (198)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • can i use him for fishing bait?

  • what if hitler was the anti christ and jfk was the 2nd coming? ax urself

  • The bigger the lie the more people will believe it.

  • You see the photo with the hole in the throat...this was suposed to be a opened to get a breathing tube in...Seriously. look at the video, his hands go to his throat...that hole was a cover up..

  • @mike62mcmanus Look at the jfk shooting again and look at the side of jfks face just before the head shot,does it look like something is really fucked up about it.I am starting to think car was rigged with something not sure but something is really wrong with the poor guys face before it explodes.

  • @bigpotplant Yea, the film was altered. 2 obvious alteration parts are when the limo suddenly drops on the street just as it begins to come out from behind the sign.

    Another is the shadows on the lawn are all going left - until the end of the film. You see the shadow of the streetlight by the bridge NOT going left, but straight down or a little to the right. The Sun sure is quick to move in a few seconds of filming.

  • @mike62mcmanus

    Come on..I have my doubts but at the same time it is very clearly documented in many publications that the tracheotomy hole was done over top of an already well identified first bullet exit wound in his windpipe....nobody is arguing this....there may be other cover-ups but this is not one of them..

  • A nut shot my president in 1963. That's just the way it is. The rest is all bullshit.

  • @oldbump You are the nut. The number of bullets alone proves a conspiracy beyond a doubt. There was NO gunpowder resdue on Oswald's cheek. He never fired a rifle that day!

  • @oldbump

    So you rest this absolute belief on a Warren Commission report done with primitive tools techniques and today..totally unacceptable investigative procedures..

    It is a fact that not a single procedure in Warren would be used ..or be allowed to be used if the same crime had occurred today...

    So you still chose to fully trust the conclusions of a commission that produced a report at a time when we were starting to believe that seat-belts in cars might be a good idea?

  • How hollywood can attempt to make a story. You just gotta laugh

  • JFK was very close in taking America out of debt with his new bill of giving the Government the power back in creating its own money system and it was a hit. Federal Reserve saw this as a major threat and began to panic.... well we all know what they did next right! R.I.P. JFK. You and Lincoln and others were victims of this scum on earth!

  • R.I.P. JOHN FRANKLIN KENNEDY ;(

  • @jbgeezer Its John Fitzgerald Kennedy

  • We see the downfall of America today. This is why JFK was killed to bring out downfall form the insiders.

  • A simple memo, declassified by the Federal Goverment under the Freedom of Information Act can contain references to some of the most classified secrets of the various agencies, but particularly those of Cental Intelligence. Actually, when you consider it logically, the authors actually envisioned the day when certain classified files might deliberately or inadvertantly be made public. This is the code similiar to that which encapsules AFA. It has been available for 10+ years now. Only hidden.

  • This is why the countless conspiracy oriented people pouring over declassified files today are apt to overlook the pointers to AFA technology. Stealth is a word that most think applies to the Air Force. Not so. It is an old Intelligence term and the secret meanings of certain classified programs and documentation hides today "within" the wording and framework of certain declassified documents. Whether the AFA could pass the litmus test of todays analysis is unknown. It has yet to be tried.

  • The AFA Intelligence had its beginnings during the latter days of WWII as a delivery system to exterminate Adolph Hitler by his own subordinates. It was later refined as an assassination delivery system without the trace elements of ballistics as we know the science today. It was not developed nor manufactured for Kennedy, but was stored in a laboratory in New Mexico for that moment when just such an executive delivery system might be required. Declassification is only in part. And under code.

  • Allen Dulles, though demoted and splattered into a thousand shards, was very much still in control of certain operations at this point. Bissel was on a leash, but not, in any case one held by the President. One should note that Intelligence loyalty ran along agency lines prior to Gen. Bedell Smith and it is doubtful that the hardened survivors would cater to servantude with the Kennedy regime. The bulldog Hoover had little understanding of this side of the fence. No matter. His role was minor.

  • I am not at all certain how much Hoover's finest brought to the table during the "shuffleboard" matches and one might never be certain that the attending convalesents on the sideline were not Intelligence dupes disquised as hapless seniors. That the AFA intelligence was discussed and provided by Central Intelligence (probably much so to Jim Angleton's disgust) is evidenced by the events that were to transpire. In any case the weapons system was delivered at some point in time, Langley or not.

  • While the existance of the Senior Care Facility near Langley Headquarters is not new by any stretch of the imagination, the use of its outdoor amenities has been only recently revealed by declassified documentation. It is obvious that the 'tongue-in-cheek reference to the shuffleboard courts refers to that very benign setting where agents of the Central Intelligence Agency might meet with their counterparts within the Bureau without overt fear of being bugged one by the other. Such was the time.

  • Without a doubt, the Freemasons contrived with DCI Richard Helms and J. Edgar Hoover, both 33rd degree Illumminati over the leaked Bureau Memorandum DD-T 100 using AFA advanced technology to assassinate the President. The 20 known Freemasons in Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63 were a part of Operation Pyracanthia. Clandestine preparations for the efforts were initiated at a very unique meeting venue in Langley, Virginia known by local seniors as "the shuffleboard court".

  • The front was blown forward, when they laid him on his back, the broken flaps still attached by the skin fell back into place. That is a simplified explanation. But true.

  • @BlueWolfe38 Oh thanks. I assume you where talking to me, right?

  • good bye fuck face

  • umm i thought he was shot in the head i mean thats wat it looks lke in the assasination videos

  • I have a question about the picture of a dead jfk with his eyes oped. does anyone else see that it looks like his face was pasted on someone elses body? looks like someone wearing a mask.

  • @mortimer2100 It probably was a mask, I mean, the bullet nearly took his face off, it exploded the back half of his head. If you look at the throat injury picture, his head is intact, so it is either fake, or he is wearing a mask

  • Ha. Reading this tit for tat of barmtrail and moproducer. Here's something else to consider. I saw the One World Order video by G. Bush. He is a Nazi.

    "Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." - Henry Kissinger (R), Sec. of State for Nixon & Ford, Natnl. Security Advsr. For Nixon, Ford, Bush, quoted by Bob Woodward, 1976.

    "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." - Henry Kissinger, New York Times, Oct. 28, 1973.

  • The assassinations of JFK, RFK, MLK and Malcum X were tragedies world wide.

  • VERY FEW PEOPLE KNOW THAT JOHN KENNEDY WAS SHOT IN THE BACK FROM THE TRUNL OD THE LINCOLN CONTINENTAL AT AN UPWARD ANGLE FROM HIS SIXTH CERVICAL VERTWBRAE! THE PARKLAND DOCTORS WERE TRYING TO SAVE THE PRESIDENT'S LIFE...HE HAD NO BRAIN MATTER LEFT!! THEY WERE TRYING TO FIND THE PISTOL BULLET THAT ENTERED LOW IN HIS BACK AND CAUSED THE NECK WOUND! WHICH WOULD SHOW A KILLER IN THE TRUNK WHICH HAD BEEN "GUARDED" ALL THE PREVIOUS NIGHT BY THE COMPLICIT SECRET SERVICE DETAIL AND IT'S HEAD!

  • Case closed? Yes, it is - as far as I am concerned. I don't really have any more to say on this. To repeat, the two strongest pieces of evidence are: Oswald's older brother and the 92 year old guy firing the MC rifle three time - easily - in the time allowed. BTW? Penn Jillette did the same thing on "Bullshit". I am waiting for Tom Hanks to come out with the HBO special about Bugliosi's "Reclaiming History". Supposedly next year, I understand. Best wishes.

  • @tbdonnelly67 got your pm if you dont want to reply thats fine i have no problem with that .but you were the one making all sorts of claims not me ,you were the one claiming posner and bugliosi had cracked the case not me ,if your going to say the things you say you should expect to be questioned on them . that you didnt try to refute my comments above about bugliosi really says all that needs to be said on the matter .merry christmas.

  • just like 9/11, people within the US government assisted with the operation however it was Israel's Mossad which initiated the operation.

    JFK wanted to investigate Israel's Nuclear plant called Dimona. Israel would have none of that!

    the book FINAL JUDGEMENT breaks the entire operation down

    also a BBC documentary called ISRAEL's Secret Weapon dives into the subject matter

    lastly, Gaddafi prior to being targeted by the powers that be had a speech where he stated this fact!

    <3

  • @theTRUTHprincess There are more powerful force that initiated the attack. 6 months after he signed the executive order no. 11110, in an attempt to abolish the Federal reserve, international bankers had him killed. What Gadaffi said was only a minor one compared to the effort of JFK to end the Federal reserve system in the US.

  • @ASIANBOYZPRODUCTION

    I am VERY familiar with executive order no. 11110, and the fact is that MYTH was started to cover up what I stated!!!

    That executive order was NOT going to get rid of the fed!

    I was shocked when I learned that, you probably will dismiss it because it has been spread so widely, but eventually you too will see the light!

    G. Edward Griffin has exposed that myth pretty throughly.

    Now regardless, the fact is ISRAEL and the FED are both connected via The ROTHSCHILDS!!!

  • @theTRUTHprincess no, it's one way to weaken the hold of the federal reserve by controlling the silver. FR is too powerful to be abolished just by one bill. In any way, majority of the owners of the FR are Jews and Rothschild are also one of the man behind the making of Israel as a state. Muslims hate Jews since then, so it could also be a propaganda of gadaffi to attack/hate Israel. All in all, it could all be connected. One of the biggest clue was his speech on secret society

  • @theTRUTHprincess And again, yes, Rothschilds holds Europe, US, and Israel as it's possesions. Too bad Jews and Rothschild zionist are usually mixed up together. I guess that's what they want. They want us to hate the jews or Israel or Great Britain to hide the real enemy. Presidents and prime ministers are just visual ones. I guess it requires a world wide revolution to end their tyranny. They created WW1 and WW2, and now they want to create one like it's just a child's game

  • @ASIANBOYZPRODUCTION That's not what 11110 did at all. It took the president's _existing_ authority to issue silver certificates, and delegated that to the treasury sec.

    If the purpose of 11110 was to "abolish the Fed", then why did JFK sign public law 88-36 the same day, which specifically gave the Fed the authority to issue $1 FRN's--the only denomination of silver certificates still being issued in 1963?

    Read what the laws actually say--not what some conspiracy site tells you they say.

  • @almostfm i guess your right. well, in any way it's all in one package for the the Rothschild zionist.

  • Kevin Costner is an actor. JFK was a leader. The title of this is misleading and false.

  • jfk was a threat to some powerful interests- they made their money in oil and arms and they felt jfk was a national security threat. they had wet ops pros ready to go - it's always been this way -we just got to go along to get along as lbj used to sAY.

  • Your father was he CIA to? LOL The CIA? Oswald lived in Russia if it was a hit it was the Russians.. Irregardless Oswald was there.. you been watching to many crappy conspiracy theories crap with Jesse the liar Ventura and Alex Jones who have both made millions of $ off all that 911 conspiracy crap.. Yeah our Government officials are homicidal they killed Gary Coleman to...LOL

  • @crookhunter Gary Coleman was killed because he was talking about a comeback.

  • i never like his punk ass any ways lol

  • israelis killed him

    moussad

  • Kevin caostner

  • THEN WAS A TIME OF ASSASSINATION, JFK, M.L.KING, BLA BLA AND OTHERS!!MAN WTF

  • Kevin Costner is incredulous.

  • Lee Harvey was part of the conspiracy. The rules go like this: you get caught, you die before you can spill the beans.

  • this is not jfk the picture dose not look like him

  • JFK was missing about a third of his skull, from the front to mid skull. That part of his skull cap was completely gone. This picture (supposed post mortem) is an absolute fake.

  • There are 2 obvious problems with this video.

    1-1JFK did not have black hair. Look at his inauguration video, or other videos. The pictures are phony, because the hair has been blackened.

    2-The body on the morgue table is not JFK. It is JD Tippit, the DPD cop that was murdered minutes later. JD Tippit had black hair. Hint: JD Tippit was a scheduled execution, to be done ASAP after Kennedy.

  • @barmtraiI i agree. he looks pretty good for somebody who had part of their head blown away.

  • @barmtraiI have you even seen the other pictures of that autopsy? All the pictures that are in black and white?

  • @barmtraiI LMFAO what a bunch of bunk. Do you have any concrete proof other then this Oliver Stone bunk movie to back up your bogus claims? Why do you CT's always think you know more then the experts?? yeah Tippit just happened along Oswald who shot him and there were witnesses to that shooting .. There also was only one shooter.. oswald. If it was a conspiracy it was a Russian one. No one mentions that. He did live in Russia and tried to go back.. get REAL proof or STFU drone

  • @crookhunter sigh another troll , if you guys are correct and everyone else is wrong it should be very easy to simply post the evidence you have that proves everyone else wrong .but this is not what happens trolls have to resort to attacks on people or childish name calling and insults . if your correct and we are all wrong then all incorrect claims can be refuted with the evidence and lies can refuted with the truth with no need for such childish behaviour ,its a simple concept try it .

  • @barmtraiI So if it not JFK's body in the autopsy photos, and the Zapruder Film is a proven fake, that means there is no documented evidence that JFK was shot. The only conclusion you can come to is that JFK faked his death and there was no assassination, much like OBL's death.

  • @Anon371 So if you mom was walking by the alley entrance behind the theater, and a wino is known to live there, she must be giving him Head and other services. Did she ever tell you which wino is your daddy?

  • @barmtraiI lolwut

  • @barmtraiI JFK's hair was drenched in blood making it appear darker than it's natural color. Especially drying blood. It tends to take on a darker brown to rust color. The only problem I have with the photo's is the ones holding the the flaps forward over the top to give an illusion that the wounds were not that backThe same can be said for the side of the head.

  • @any12u Try again. His videos at the airport are brown hair.

    Think!!! Look again at the colored autopsy death head photo. Hair is red and black. Just try to explain that. If his hair was blacked by 24hr blood drying on it, then what about the red hair part?

    This video is entirely about convincing you JFK had black hair. Again, see his inauguration video. Certainly brown.

  • @barmtraiI bullshit.

  • @moproducer barntrail is correct. I saw the video of his inauguration. Brown hair. Also saw the color pics at the airport and riding in the limo. Brown hair. Biy some of the limo pics show black hair. Regardless, it is still Tippit on that death photo. The sideburns gave it away.

  • @10Faenor You can't tell a thing from a photo that has been recopied and reproduced hundreds of times. Contrasts and grayscale densities are impossible to maintain accurately without an accompanying reference chip. If anyone here knew what they were talking about, they'd show enough scientific knowledge to provide for that.

    Do you have the original photo?

  • @moproducer You can't tell anything either. How can you prove this photo has been recopied and reproduced even once, much less than 100s of times? Your "reference chip" is nonsense talk. I saw videos of brown hair; not pictures.

    Furthermore, JFK had reddish brown hair. He was born on May 29, 1917, his eyes were green and his blood type was O RH positive. You want to argue with the bio facts? Fool.

  • @barmtraiI My point, Mr. Fool, is that neither you nor I have any scientific reinforcement to make any valid claim. All you have have is what you've seen on your TV and computer, and I'd bet the farm that you can't give full documentation for any of it.

    There are plenty of armchair-forensics like yourself who have found a hobby here...I suggest that you leave the conclusions to the pros. There's plenty going on in the 21st century to spend your time worrying over.

  • @moproducerFool historyplace . com/ kennedy/ president . htm

    Reconnect the web page without spaces. The feds can not get and redo all of the pictures.

    Next, subliminal messages on TV. infocellar . com/ television/ subliminal . htm

    Read what Bush did. They are still doing it to us. Now, stop blaming the German people for following Hitler, or the Chinese following Mao, people following other dictators. You are them.

  • @barmtraiI Sounds like someone didn't eat all his Wheeties this morning...

  • @moproducer Looks like you enjoy being someone's cannon fodder.

  • @moproducer I gave the documentation. But as for you betting and losing your farm to me, don't worry. I have no interest for it. You keep it.

    I noticed what jacobji5 said. Unlike you, I will look it up.

  • @moproducer

    It's interesting to find someone with such utter faith in procedures used by the Warren Commission..when none would be utilized...had the same crime occurred today.

    Primitive forensics..questionable administration..primitive conditions...and yet unyielding trust that all was done to perfection.

    I certainly would not go up in a rocket designed and built in 1965..why..however would we expect perfection from the Warren Commission.

    Forensics is a science..it never stops.

  • @zeroceiling If you really want to accept the Warren report as gospel, it's not my goal to stop you. I also don't preach to conspiracy theorists to "get a life". I really have better things to do.

    I do believe it is utterly laughable when I see people take "evidence" gleaned from mass media and try to pretend that they are doing controlled forensic science. These folks would better serve society if they would go back to their junior high chemistry kit and make something explode.

  • @moproducer

    Well I think you have perhaps misunderstood me.

    I agree that the plethora of theories is overwhelming..and that some people should in fact get a life..given that their theories will never be proven.

    Having said that..I am actually making the point that either you accept Warren Commission with all is inadequacies and gaps...or you dont...(I personally dont)

    However..if you reject WC..as many do..you are then stuck...since Oswald= WC= No conspiracy.

    Many reject that.

  • @zeroceiling You didn't address my point. I really don't care about opinions. They're kinda like assholes: Everybody has one; I can't change yours, you can't change mine. Believe Warren, Herman, Bozo, whatever, amen.

    My argument - Warren report go or nogo - is that we seem to have a garden crop of truck drivers-cum-forensic scientists (especially on this forum). To unleash such buffoonery painted in a coat of faux perspicacity is, to me, a greater enigma than Kennedy's death.

  • @moproducer

    No..I get your argument very clearly and your overused quotation of John Lennon's throw away phrase..as well.

    Your stated consternation over the fact that people see their convictions clearly..should not be a surprise..it's either a conviction or its not.

    Are ordinary people supposed to stop wondering?

    Christ..Bern just announced quarks traveling faster then 186,000km/sec..a potential shattering of an absolute.

    Surely..perspicacity of this quest was also questioned.

  • @moproducer

    Further..why is this an enigma to you?

    This..if any forum is the one where people have the ability and the right to share their thoughts in a non academic environment that some users of youtube tortuously try to enforce..forgetting that this is not MIT or any other institute held to higher standards then the the views that frequent this site.

    This is an enigma to you?

    Why?..its so patently understandable.

    Those with a penchant for academic rigor have other outlets. 

  • @zeroceiling I suppose that next, you'll tell me that each of the minutia-littered "explanations" on this forum has scientific merit.

    But, please stop looking down the road for one moment and understand: It's a free country. If you or anyone else wants to wear a trashcan on your head & tell me that the sky is falling, you have that right.

  • @moproducer

    You really are not getting this or I am very lousy at making my point.

    It's baffling to me to have you read my brief..which clearly states that this forum is not requisite of "ANY" kind of merit...it is a forum devoid of academic constraints..therefore yes of course..likely none of the "opinions of the plebes on here have scientific merit..where in a careful read did you actually get the contrary..out of my post??

    ..so yeah..total freedom of expression..here at least.

  • @zeroceiling Sir or madam, we seem to be at a communications impasse. Your first line of dialog, last, may be the most astute comment you've made. This closed circuit of self-repetition is giving me vertigo. So I shall now, and forever upon this forum, cease to waste my precious fingertips on the keyboard.

    Go thou, and spread thy wings against winds warmed by the witless wrangling of walleyed Walter Mittys. May the days of your breath extend beyond the existence of oxygen.

  • @moproducer

    Yes sir..madam...I have no illusions that I am on you-tube...a cross-section of witless....rational...enlighte­ned and even brilliant...

    I expect no miraculous breakthroughs in any area that I happen to land on...

    I think the secret is managing ones expectations and take that which makes sense to you and leave the rest......as much of an enigma as that may be....

    and I must admit your last line has left me breathless......

  • @moproducer I do have to come back to your consternation at mans enigmatic quest to share thought..

    What in the world are we here for?...thoughts are likely the most important byproducts of our existence. .and sharing of these is absolutely vital.

    30,000 years ago I am sure arguments and different views on how the mammoth hunt went were quite common..

    so why is it enigmatic to you that people want to share thoughts and theories..that is not an enigma in any sense of the word.

  • @barmtraiI If its TIppit, why does he have a throat wound? Tippit was never shot there. President Kennedy was. Your logic is flawed

  • @TheLuckiLuciano THINK!!! Tippit was altered. Go to the web page called: morningstar 3-2. Halfway down the page see Jaw Comparison. See 4 pics. Never mind the jaws. Look closely at the sideburns hair on both JFK & Tippit.

    Then go back up to the colored morgue table pic called "JFK". You decide whose sideburns are on that morgue table.

  • unreal dead bodies don't bleed

    

  • These Evil LBJ statements WE believe refers to the murder of JFK

    "It is the Melancholy law of human societies to be compeled sometimes to chose a great evil in order to ward off a greater evil"

    YOU want to see a guilty MAN? check this out , = LBJ coments on JFK assasination 1969.wmv

    LBJ Evil joke about JFK

    "I told? him that morning at breakfast...Son, I'm afraid this just ant' your day. Your going to the morgue and I'm going back to the White House"

    JFK

    J ustice

    F or

    K ennedy WE OWE IT TO HI

  • HE WAS THE LAST TRUE PRESIDENT OF THE USA. A CATHOLIC MAN AND A GOOD MAN

  • Oliver stone made so many errors in this piece of bunk. The only think he got right was that JFK was killed.

  • @shaboo2 Vincent Bugliosi said he got the date and time of the assassination right. Other than that it was one continuous lie from beginning to end.

  • @tbdonnelly67  bugliosi would know quite a bit about errors and lies if his book is anything to go by .

  • Stone's movie was a bunch of BULLSHIT! You want the truth? Read Gerald Posners "Case Closed" and Vincent Bugliosi's "Reclaiming History". It was LHO in the School Book Depository with a Manlicher-Carcano Rifle. Three fairly easy shots that have been duplicated by others several times. LHO was not a great shot but he was good enough.

  • @tbdonnelly67 gee don can i wipe my azz with that???.

  • @myleftnutts I suppose you could but why would you want to? Occam's Razor tells us that the simplest explanation is usually the right one.

    Why does LHO in the TSBD building with the MC rifle cause sooooooo much argument? It is the simplest and most reasonable one there is. The first shot missed. The second shot hit both Dennedy and Connally. Third shot was the head shot. All available evidence points to this. It is the only one that fits. Why make it more difficult?

  • @tbdonnelly67 You are a liar. Otherwise you could tell us who duplicated these "fairly easy shots". You are a liar!

  • @FlowTrainer Liar? How can I be a liar when I am quoting the sources (Posner and Bugliosi) I named before? Also watch the ABC program on Beyond Conspiracy with Peter Jennings. The segment with the old guy dry firing the rifle convinced me. I also went to Dealy Plaza. It is surprising how SMALL that place it. It was not a hard shot. The MC rifle was not a great rifle and LHO was not a great shot but they were both good enough on that day.

  • @tbdonnelly67 Yes, you are a liar! Posner did not duplicate the shots.

    Despite from that Posner is known as a liar and a plagiarist. So, what do you want to tell us by referring to posner?

  • @FlowTrainer OK, granted, Posner and Bugliosi did not themselves duplicate the shots but I have seen them duplicated on TV several times. The thing that finally clinched it for me was LHO's older brother who is himself convinced of his brother's guilt. Tom Hanks is presenting Bugliosi's "Reclaiming History" in an HBO special now in production. I am greatly anticipating it. The REAL liar here is Oliver Stone and the movie "JFK". It's a disgrace. Even many conspiracy apologists admit that.

  • @tbdonnelly67 you are always lying to us, turdball.

    BTW, did you and your man friend remember to wash off your shit stain from your moms rented dildo? Better do it. She will be coming home from back alley soon. Speaking of, did you ever find out which one is your daddy?

  • @arther1046 OMG! You low life scum bag piece of shit ....... Did you finish fifth grade? A fairly reasonable discussion here and you have to interject your vile nonsense into the mix? Do you feel you added anything? Do you feel you hurt my feelings in any way? Go crawl back under your rock and let the adults talk, you ignorant little asshole. Someone should sprinkle roach powder on you.

  • @tbdonnelly67 you never saw any TSBD shot duplicated. NONE ! You lying fucktard. Just try to prove it. Just give us a video to look at.

  • @arther1046 OK - Enough of the name calling! We are adults aren't we? I saw two programs on TV in the USA in which the shots were duplicated - esp. the "magic bullet". I live in China now so I don't have access to US TV nor do I remember the names. I am NOT lying about this - OK? I will continue my interest in this as you will too, I am sure. I am looking forward to HBO's treatment of "Reclaiming History" in 2013. Let's hope we are - both of us..... hell, ALL of us - alive to see it !?

  • @arther1046 I still say the most compelling piece of evidence is LHO's own brother who says he believes that he did it all by himself. I have three brothers myself and it would take an enormous amouth of evidence to convince me that they murdered anybody, much less the POTUS. This is all I am going to say about this unless I find those two programs. You want to rant at me again? Knock yourself out......QED

  • @tbdonnelly67 Idiot liar. Oswald's brother did not say he did it. Now, did you hear the latest? Jackie Kennedy said it was Johnson and others. Conspiracy. Jackie said she kept her mouth shut publicly for fear of more Kennedy killings by the government assholes that you support. It was on drudge last night.

  • @arther1046 I don't support our government in many matters. YOU are the IDIOT. Oswald's brother DID say that. Watch ABC's "Beyond Conspiracy" with the late Peter Jennings. I read The Drudge Report too. All it says there is that the Jackie tapes have not been released and don't contain anything of note.... or are you going to make something out of that too? Like I said. QED. Look it up. Then rant on, asshole...... (They have special hospitals and lots of medicine that will help you now.)

  • @tbdonnelly67 Stop lying. Oswald's brother did not say it.

    Monday Drudge archives. Hour 14 minute 53 second 57. Headline: "Jackie believed LBJ behind JFK's assassination". I suppose that headline is not anything of note to a CIA ass wipe.

  • About farter1046-Dickhead wannabe w/no life, doesn't have enough facts/intelligence to make his argument, so blesses us w/gutter trash that has nothing to do w/the issue. Yeah, you go boy! Fair enough then... Aside from opinions on the issue, you're an ass wipe, & your momma should have sheltered you from her sleazy, penis/scrotum licking lifestyle before your mind was permanently damaged, watching her take it up the ass/in her mouth at the same time from the crack dealers she met on 4th & Main.

  • @tbdonnelly67 case closed ? are you serious . presumably like posner you think oswald never left the 6th floor when his supervisor and co workers went down for lunch at about 11.40 and that he stayed up there constructing the snipers nest and assembling his rifle laying in wait for jfk ,if this is the case i suggest you have a read of the actuall warren commission testimonies because they say otherwise .

  • @fobrien1 Case closed? Yes, it is - as far as I am concerned. I don't really have any more to say on this. To repeat, the two strongest pieces of evidence are: Oswald's older brother and the 92 year old guy firing the MC rifle three time - easily - in the time allowed. BTW? Penn Jillette did the same thing on "Bullshit". I am waiting for Tom Hanks to come out with the HBO special about Bugliosi's "Reclaiming History". Supposedly next year, I understand. Best wishes.

  • @tbdonnelly67 bugliosi in reclaiming history stated

    1: "oswald claimed he ate with jarmin" (untrue )

    2:" oswald slipped up and placed himself on the 6th floor at the time of the shots" (untrue )

    3: there was no cleaning of the limo at parklands " there is no testimony or statement from anyone that this was done." (Page 33, End Notes, #54)" vincent bugliosi ,reclaiming history (untrue )

    i expect your about to read steven kings new book next .

  • @tbdonnelly67 "To repeat, the two strongest pieces of evidence are: Oswald's older brother and the 92 year old guy firing the MC rifle three time - easily - in the time allowed"

    i assume your aware that robert oswald also said his brother wouldnt hurt anyone , funny you accept the later statment while dismissing the earlier ones, i assume the 92 year old man is lattimer .question did lattimer use the carcano in the archives for his test ? answer no ------------------------------­---

  • @tbdonnelly67 in fact i know as fact he used a different rifle ,also i know the rifle found in the tsbd had a very stiff bolt

    Mr. EISENBERG. Did they make any comments concerning the weapon?

    Mr. SIMMONS. Yes; there were several comments made particularly with respect to the amount of effort required to open the bolt. As a matter of fact, Mr. Staley had, difficulty in opening the bolt in his first firing exercise. ----------------------------

  • @tbdonnelly67 He thought it was completely up and it was not, and he had to retrace his steps as he attempted to open the bolt after the first round.

    Mr. SIMMONS. .....the pressure to open the bolt was so great that we tended to move the rifle off the target, whereas with greater proficiency this might not have occurred.

    presumably posner/bugliosi and dr lattimer didnt mention the problem with the bolt . best wishes to you to

  • JFK! JFK! JFK!!! RIP

  • "To sin by silence, when we should protest,

    makes cowards out of men." - Ella Wheeler Wilcox

  • WTF!?!?!?!?!?!?! i dont no?

  • I still recall being a little kid in the 70's and seeing the clips and t.v. movies about JFK's murder and just feeling even then (without knowing everything i know now as a adult) a VERY terrible sense of saddness (its hard to describe) what bothers me is that good men and leaders in history seem to be murdered almost 99% of the time successfully while evil men like Hitler and others(escape such attempts)and get to play out their lives almost entirely..it almost doesn't make sense

  • i want give him a hug

  • @sk8tergnome87 FUCK YEAH!!!!

  • It is utterly disgusting that anyone gets "got" like that. Those autopsy pictures are just so damn hard to look at. However as bad as it is, I truly feel the public needs to see it. Jackie Kennedy said it best, "let them see what they've done".

    They need to see this and see it often and to NEVER forget and NEVER let it happen again because if we do forget, it is bound to happen again and I swear if it happens to any President again......

  • America's rightwing was so scared of changes, that they even declared a fine man like John Fitzgerald Kennedy a communist.

    If I was an American, I would be very ashamed!!!

  • @townwood JFK was a true communist, not like Russia, or China, but TRUE communism.

  • @MINICLIPGAMER You're not very old, are you?

  • @townwood wat

  • Revelation 16....

    a. You are righteous . . . For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and You have given them blood to drink: It is completely fitting that those who delighted in shedding the blood of the saints should now be forced to drink “blood.” They have refused the Living Water, and now will be given the water of death.

  • The photo at 1:28 of JFK on the morgue table is not JFK.

    That is the body of JD Tippit, the DPD cop who was shot minutes later.

    -

    The hair color on JFK is bogus. He had brown hair, not black. See the color video at the airport; brown hair. The famed color photo In the limo on Main St.; brown hair. Look at JFKs inaugural address video; brown hair.

    Tippit had black hair.

    -

    Do you like the ways the CIA-led govt. continues to fool you, and set you up for when you see the colored morgue picture?

  • @134jallen That's an incredibaly ignorant statement

  • @pavilion130 is an incredibly ignorant idiot. And the idiot still can not spell incredibly correctly.

    -

    The brown hair of JFK, the back hair of Tippit, and the obvious difference of the two in the cut of the sideburns will always tell the truth.

    Now, everyone can understand why Tippit had to be killed. He was shot and carved up to fit whatever scenario was necessary to convince the public that JFK was only shot from behind.

  • @134jallen

    I har that the pictures of JFK was manipulated for the CIA.

    It was coup d´etat. My father told me that the brain of President Keennedy is missing.Again the CIA?The body of President manipulated too.One day Justice?

  • it seems to, instead of a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. its more like A government of the cooperation by cooperation and for the cooperation....

  • Another Z film alteration found.

    See video: JFK Assassination - Pink Rose - A song about Jackie.

    -

    At 1:30-34 see the man in white shirt & hat/helmet next to the light pole.

    All the people after him going toward the bridge do not match # of people & clothes color on the Z film. People are dubbed in on the Z film, proving alterations.

    -

    And all 4 cycle cops are not always behind the limo, as the Z film implies. We would have seen at least the right-side cycle cops shoulders / heads / helmets.

  • Oliver Stone's passionate film played an important role in supporting researchers intention to excavate truth. His film showed the mass of huge lies in the report of the Warren Commissions. What did Stone's critics do? They ctiticized peanuts and supported the Commissions hoax! These citics realy are irresponsible propagandists which feel no shame in betraying people.

  • Ugh! This movie took WAY too many liberties! It's not just a movie that played lose with the facts, it's a FANTASY version of events. Why didn't Stone address Governor Connolly's jump-seat? This oversight would have answered the "Magic Bullet" mystery.

  • That death shot is pretty grim. Theres none of the man in that face. Just a mannequin.

  • If you believe in the single gunman theory then probably you believe that the North Vietnamese Navy attacked the United States Navy which started the escalation of the deaths of thousands during the Viet Nam War. You probably believe in the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The only evidence you'll find is the evidence they want you to believe.

  • It's all part of the plan.

    - The Joker 2009TDK

  • I confess, I was the gunman behind the wooden fence on the grassy knoll. Oswald was a patsy.

  • i did it alone.

  • It was a black op definetly. Harvey Oswald was just a victim of it.

  • Oswald had a double too im sure of it.

  • RIP great man, the NWO killed him for speaking the truth...

  • @walidot

    Lho not nwo!!!

  • @walidot Finally, someone with some common sense.. he spoke out against the illuminat.. that's why he died

  • @jaydog7575 fuck ur illuminat crap that is 1 thing i dont belive in then ur gonna tell me they killed 2pac fuck off

  • @MrCrazyh81 Well, you're right.... They did kill Tupac and Michael Jackson. Anyone that speaks out against the "Monolithic and ruthless conspiracy" as JFK said dies. And by the way, I don't care what you think. You wanna learn about the Illuminati, look at the back of a dollar bill. If you don't believe that wealthy men with global plans control what you hear on the radio and see on the news is controlling you, that's on you. Good luck in the grocery stores in the coming months. Sheeple.....

  • @MrCrazyh81 P.S. In the IMMORTAL words of Tupac Shakur KILLUMINATI!!!!

  • @walidot Forgive my ignorance .... who are the NWO?

  • @mollyisagooddog I don't know if you've gotten a response but it's IMPORTANT that you know about the NWO. The presidents you think you elect are the NWO. The police you see on the streets are the NWO. go to youtube and type "Bush, New World Order" notice the date of the speech. 11 yrs to the day before the 9/11 attacks. Islamic extremists didn't attack the country that day, our gov't did. The Illuminati have all the money and power and control us. media, music, chemtrails etc.... RISE!!!!

  • @mollyisagooddog abbreviation for New World Order.

  • @walidot i agree!!!

  • @walidot I thought the NWO were wrestlers? JK i know what you mean lol.

  • @walidot You mean crazy Right-Wing Republicans?

  • You are correct usfulstuf. I also notice there is NO massive face damage where a rear shot bullet supposedly exploded out the right-upper facial area, as seen on the Zapruder film. No injury face-skinflap sticking out on the right side, as another pic shows when looking from behind his head.

    This does prove the pics are phony. They are government generated and given to the public. So, this means it was a conspiracy of certain agencies and people. And it does not look exactely like JFK.

  • You kids need to understand. The pic of Kennedy on the table that you see is....not Kennedy.

    Notice the right side ear has a trauma mark scrape and is bloody. This was caused from his head falling onto the street after he was shot. WTF you say? THINK!! Kennedy did not have that ear injury because of being shot in the throat and head.

    This ear injury belongs to the body pf JD Tippit, the cop supposedly shot by Oswald, minutes later. JD Tippit is/was a JFK double, but a bit younger looking.

  • wtf man.

  • Dude, sorry, but that's just fucking insane. I'm pretty sure there was a cover-up and a conspiracy, but your laughable explanation is way too moronic and paranoid. Make the theory fit the evidence, don't make the evidence fit the theory, or you're no better than the Warren Commission.

  • See the 'Wide Zapruder' film video. Shadows are not correct. Proof of alterations means CONSPIRACY.

    REMEMBER, the Zapruder film on youtube is from govt. source.

    "Click-stop the film. Stop it at frame # 367. See the light post shadow at the top of the film slant LEFT about 60 degree from vertical like the people?

    Stop at frame 411 about 20 yards further. 2 light pole shadows go to the RIGHT from vertical.

    CIA alteration missed them. This is the reality for 12:30pm, panning south with a camera".

  • Dude...no offense, but that's bullshit. Also, it was the 1960's -- they couldn't do stuff like that even if they thought they *could* get away with it.

  • @grumpytosnowwhite A couple of researchers conducted a test and they wanted to see if they could alter video using the same tech as the zapruder film and camera. They concluded it was "VERY" easy to alter and manipulate film in 1963. All you are doing essentially is cutting frames and grouping them together. Also, you can easily change the sprocket holes on the film to insert or remove images, enlarge or shrink them. You could also insert paint or color and basically animate anything you wanted