Richard Dawkins Liar, Lunatic, or both [MIRRORED]

[Mark777X]

Dear god, on judgement day if shockofgod makes it into heaven could you please put me somewhere else..... if you put me where you put all the thinkers that would be fine

P.S. if you get stuck trying to find evidence that athisem is accurate and correct try to miracle some more IQ into shocks head

[schecteraxeman17]

What kind of Christian drives in the carpool lane alone on a motorcycle?

[tmcthree]

Didn't Lott offer his daughter in place of the angels?

[stephenpi]

Don't criticize Shock's riding - that's an ad hominem attack. You should address his argument, which is that genocide is good if God says so, and Dawkins is crazy not to accept this.

[matbenja]

You are the man to say that Richard Dawkins its a lier, i think you are and a idiot and a bit retarded

[theonlywayisgay]

@shockofgodfree.....you are a bufoon!

[Nocturnalux]

Did he just admit that good old Yaweh isn't as cool as Jesus? Aren't they the same? Oh why do I even bother.

[kittysparkleeyes]

you must have read a different bible to the one I read mate. You can be agnostic and athiest. I am an agnostic athiest. You can also be an agnostic theist. -_- A gnostic is someone who "KNOWS" something to be true. an Agnostic is someone who cannot catagorically say there is or is not a god because they lack evidence. It is not the same as being theist or athiest. a GNOSTIC attitude leads a dogma, and Dawkins is a scientist and therefore not a fan of dogma. I need EVIDENCE for a deity.

[alberto148]

@shockofgod - Liar, Lunatic? or Both?

[sheilacow]

Quote from conservapedia article about richard dawkins: " He (richard dawkins) is an ardent opponent of religion, which he dismisses as mere superstition.[1] However, Dawkins has offered no effective rebuttal to studies which show that the irreligious are more likely to be superstitious than evangelical Christians."

I find it strange that irreligious people are supposedly more superstitious than a group who is solely defined by their superstitious belief in a god.

[panmoudrej]

I know how it feels, man. Dawkins is even trying to prove that Little Red Riding Hood never lived. May he burn in hell forever!!!

[jazzx251]

I've never mirrored a video before - so I need one of you to teach me. He's a living lesson in how not to be safe on the road.

I aim to prove that shockofgod's use of a motorcycle on a public road is in no way "accurate and correct". Indeed - it is downright dangerous!

Apart from ignoring the road markings, and speeding to boot, he gets faster as he ascends into full-on preach mode (gets the blood pumping) - his mind is occupied with the Bible instead of other peoples' road safety.

[ArcaneAardvark]

I got to about 4minutes and couldn't take any more . .

[simondsaid]

Lemme just... say the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and pretend that I'm right because I've obviously said it enough that it has to be true.

[ggliddy]

what the fuck is this guy talking about? jesus never existed. the bible is not literal. what a dumbass.

[123whitechapel]

Hmmm I love Richard Dawkins. I wonder what kind of bike this lunatic is riding. Anyone?

[crazylilting]

If god is so just how come he repents as much as he does in the OT? And how come God saved LOT if he was willing to give his daughters to the crowd? Is this the action of a holy man? I think you need to read your bible while your sitting on the couch instead of on your bike.

[Pumonca]

Like Lot... who took the Angels in trying to protect them..."

I thought you read the bible smart guy? He offered his virgin daughters to the crowd as a sacrifice (of their bodies) to appease the crowd.... yah, Lot is a real winner there.

[Pumonca]

Like Lot... who took the Angels in trying to protect them..."

I thought you read the bible smart guy? He offered his virgin daughters to the crowd as a sacrifice (of their bodies) to appease the crowd.... yah, Lot is a real winner there.

[Taranofsky]

he's a what? I didn't catch that, maybe you should repeat it over and over again

[mrVDyne]

Richard Dawkins made your motorcycle.

[christinele888]

Making a youtube video while driving a motorcycle? This is what I call Natural Selection.

[ThinkBrad]

Way to ride in the carpool lane on a motorcycle. Nice job breaking the law.

[TheFallofSaodos]

@ThinkBrad lmao was thinking the same thing

[darththeo]

@ThinkBrad In my state, you can .. also he can get into trouble with the law for the camera.

[ThinkBrad]

I don't think you would make these crap videos while riding a motorcycle if you didn't believe in God.

[ScottBrown666]

Yeah, the dude who made this lies massively in this video. He makes all kinds of claims about RD like he supports rape and doesn't support the virtues of Jesus. RD has an ATHEISTS FOR JESUS shirt, so that should put a nail in that retarded coffin.

I can't even tell him how stupid he is publicly because he censors his comments like the dunce he is.

[reidstuff92]

lmao I love how enthusiastic he is about the title at the beginning

[streetography]

shockofgod@ you are a coward, if you are thinking of moving up to manhood sometime in the near future, then let all people respond to your video, not just the comments that you subscribe to, cause you are bagging atheists, but you are scared of our replies, it's kicking someone in the balls and then running behind a wall, childish.

[nemirn]

I am blocked from shockofgod's channel because I politely asked him a question so he could defend his views.

He's a fucking idiot. He is a good example of the Dunning-Krueger effect.

[nemirn]

I am blocked from Shockofgod's channel becuase I politely asked him a question to defend his points.

He's a fucking idiot.

[Birdieupon]

@nemirn

"I politely asked him a question to defend his points.....

....He's a fucking idiot."

not sure I'm inclined to believe that.

[shockofgodfree]

@Birdieupon Trust me....shockofgod is an idiot and a coward, why else would he block and run like a frightened little schoolgirl when some one tries to debate him?

[C4RLS4G4N]

Evidence? You just read back things you read in a book. Tell me this, if there are several religions each with different views and rules of from different gods, which one is right? How come your religion is right and they are wrong. Only one can be right, or all are wrong - they all cant be right.

[chrismountenay]

I've never seen a more amazing collection of ad hominem fallacies, straw men, question-begging, circular logic, equivocations, quote-mining, and nearly every other informal fallacy. I don't know where to begin. This should be shown in critical thinking classes to show how not to formulate an argument. Truly amazing.

[shockofgodfree]

@chrismountenay I really wish shockofgod would have the guts to look and read your comment.....it's so great, you just summed him up completely, kudos

[chrismountenay]

@shockofgodfree Thank you; I'm flattered. I actually have taught a college-level critical thinking class and would be really tempted to show this if I ever taught another.

[ebart1961]

Maybe his arguments are turning clever just after the third minute? I'll probably never know.

[shockofgodfree]

@ebart1961 They don't, believe me, they just get so much worse......

[streetography]

Dawkins doesn't hate god or satan, cause he's intelligent enough to know they don't exist, but you have a vendetta against him, therefore it's you who are angry. You still believe in satan and his arch enemy, and all the other stories, so why hasn't god slayed satan after all this time? and when was the last time you saw them, outside of your imagination that is? maybe because it's man that keeps the fire of religion kindled, not god.

[Birdieupon]

@streetography

"why hasn't god slayed satan after all this time?"

So, an internal theological question, rather than an argument against their existence? Anybody with even a surface understanding of theology should know that this is supposed to happen at the end of the universe, when all people have lived through the chance to choose.

"when was the last time you saw them"

How can you see immaterial beings? Again, basic theology which you should get right before using it as an argument.

[shockofgodfree]

@Birdieupon The question wasn't theological but moral. If God is good, and if he loves his children, just like any good father, he would protect his children. So why doesn't he? streetography's question stands on the morality or immorality of God's indiference and inaction, not some grand design.

[TodaysThought]

@shockofgodfree - How does GOD not protect his children?

[Aathorus]

@Birdieupon which just brings us back to the point that the proof and evidence in the support of the paradigm you present is far out weighed by the proof and evidence that qualifies our disbelief. Even with a sound understanding of theology, the logic supporting your beliefs is flawed.

[Birdieupon]

@Aathorus

"far out weighed by the proof and evidence that qualifies our disbelief."

what is this proof and evidence that God does not exist?

[Aathorus]

@Birdieupon go find it for yourself. Learn new things, explore what the pool of human knowledge has to offer. I do not have time to sit here and try to educate you about how reasoned logic works, how we learn from the scientific method, or to discuss epistemology with you. Maybe some other poor sod would like to but you people flat out bore me. I was a christian, I have studied the bible with 3 different denominations, continued to read it after I left the faith and furthermore....

[Aathorus]

.... I came to the realization that christianity was false long before Dawkins ever published the God Delusion. I have experienced the so called love that you christians are so incapable of practicing. I know you are wrong.

[Birdieupon]

@Aathorus

"go find it for yourself."

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!

What a COWARD!!

You cannot even reply with one single scrap of an argument!

What would you think of me if I refused to share evidence for theism with you, and merely told you to go find it yourself?

That has to be the most laughable and pathetic thing I've heard an atheist say... and I've heard plenty!

It's always the same: an atheist claims overwhelming evidence against God, but cannot cite a single thing when challenged.

[Aathorus]

@Birdieupon you're on you christian Troll. Just wait until I have the time and I'm coming for you.

[RealityScope]

@Birdieupon There is no proof that god does NOT exist but that is because the hypothesis that god exists is UNFALSIFIABILE. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate with evidence that god exists. An extraordinary claim should be backed by extraordinary evidence--you should have no trouble coming up with some if you are right.

[streetography]

@Birdieupon Oh so we must wait for the story line to come to an end (after man has gone) before god slays satan, are you serious? you actually believe these childish fables, a grown person accepts and doesn't question the stupidity in that statement. Are they not ALL powerful "immaterial beings" that created man, but they cannot turn themselves into human form for our eyes to witness? how powerful ARE these creatures. You have just emphasised how illusive god is and how childish the stories are.

[Birdieupon]

@streetography

" you actually believe these childish fables"

You asked a theological question, about why does Christianity say X, Y and Z. I answered it. Even a well-read atheist could have told reported to you what I said.

And how does your not liking the idea that justice will be done later (at the best time, given that God is supposed to know best) show it isn't true?

Yep, incarnation can happen, but would you believe it or dismiss as hallucination? Your objections don't prove atheism.

[streetography]

@Birdieupon The burden of proof lies with you, for claiming there is a god, the atheist does not say 100% that there is no god, there is just no proof of one, BUT YOU CLAIM THERE IS. And by the way about the question of satan, even the christians have way too many varying opinions on the matter, so don't try to tell me it's in the bible 101 course. So aside from a BOOK being in publication, what do you have? can you still feel him, see him, talk to him, outside of you're imagination that is?

[Birdieupon]

@streetography

"The burden of proof lies with you"

That is a tired old dogma of New Atheism.

"the atheist does not say 100% that there is no god"

They don't have to. The theist doesn't say 100% either. They say there's more reasons for it than against it, so it is worth believing in. The atheist must show it is more reasonable that there is no God.

"there is just no proof of one"

Nope, that's agnosticism. Lacking evidence is an epistemic barrier - lack of knowledge - which tells you 0.

[streetography]

@Birdieupon Are you a creationist?

[Birdieupon]

@streetography

Why does that matter? This wouldn't be the atheist tactic of machine-gunning different questions one after another, would it?

(but no, not YEC).

[streetography]

@Birdieupon If i believe in aliens, must i not be able to prove that they exist to a non believer, for you can not make statements about something existing and then tell the non believer to prove that this something doesn’t exist, y’all made the claim that he exists, and if you didn’t believe that, then why are there so many churches, faith schools, Jesus camps, ”gods’ word used in every area of goverment, threatening non believers, gays and vegans with eternal hellfire,if it was just a hunch.

[streetography]

@Birdieupon What has the non believer got to prove other than say, thus far i have seen no evidence in aliens existing, so at this point i will stick to the side of caution (cause why would you want to take on another false belief, it’s essentially baggage) until they either land, where i can see them for myself or it has been proven scientifically (not religiously) that they exist.

[streetography]

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household." Matthew 10:34-37

[Aathorus]

I laughed so hard when I saw this one.

Shock seems a little shaken up. Weak faith maybe?

[shockofgodfree]

@Aathorus I'd just say weak period, wouldn't you;-)

[Aathorus]

@shockofgodfree yes, yes I would ;)

[86alfon]

this video sucks