Still Lunar: NASA shots of long-lost Soviet Moon rover

[Maxibonua]

всё хуйня , луноход заебись

[MateiAlexandruBogdan]

Every single robot on that moon is now an enemy of the republic!

[borgduck]

So the poor robot rover gets to sit there, bored for eternity. No alien greys for company?

[hunterziegelmann]

Who is going onto google earth to look for it after the vid? :D

[kaderoder]

No manned missions to Moon, only rovers.

[Glinkaism1]

Wowser! She can take me to Vegas for fun and games. :) Screw the moon!

[turboman2]

A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing. You can say anything is fake but to do that you have to prove it. I havent seen anyone prove any of the accusations. The NASA video signals that were sent from the moon were not compatible with the television broadcast standard so NASA had to film a monitor that was showing the NASA signal then rebroadcast it to the public. Before people make these wild accusations they should actually do some research first.

[akirafactor]

@turboman2 Apollo "Moon Landings," Greatest Hoax of Modern Human History

As goes the credibility of NASA, so goes the credibility of the USA.

[vigo894]

@akirafactor= And I am the God Emperor of Arrakis. Kneel boy. And pledge allegiance to the Empire.

[chevydeo]

@turboman2 2001: A space odyssey.

Stanley Kubrick faked the landings on the moon at disney´s.

the 1000 of photo´s u can see are fake (lot of them are compossitions), as the trasmition.

the rock samples could be any meteor.

about recent photos :Imagine they can fake anything nowadays.

And maybe, just maybe you would never beleive its a hoax.

[shawnshawn426]

@chevydeo That is a movie, and you can tell it's fake. Again the burden of proof is on you, you can't just say something and not prove it, of FYI (that's 'for your information") It would be harder to get soil samples from an asteroid. Are you really suggesting w are not technologically capable to land anything on the moon when they can hit you with a missile in the face from across the world? And how is hundreds of gov. officials suppose to keep a secret if they are incompetent?

[chevydeo]

@shawnshawn426 We are talking about 40 years ago, and i think no, we weren´t capable.

Anything was valid to avoid a war against URRS. in fact that stopped the cold war.

I understand it was better for all of us. wasnt it?

Well, now the u.s. goverment lie to get wars. so....

[shawnshawn426]

@chevydeo we obviously were capable, and even more so now. there are a ton of reasons the cold war ended, this is not being a major factor. and i dont think they would be able to keep any secret, as they cant keep secret a president jizzing on the blouse of some bimbo in the oval office or they cant keep secret people sneaking around some hotel looking for bugs (watergate)

[chevydeo]

@shawnshawn426 yeah righ,t then who killed kenedy?

[akirafactor]

v=y1tqZyZVoDM

[hozayamz]

Lunokhod is fake, Apollo is fake, it's all a fake. The Soviets and National Security State America worked for the same clever oligarchical structure. Landing a rocket on it's hind end- remotely,- using technology of 1970- how many tries would it take? Space programs are the propaganda wing of the military complex. The true target of all these contrivances- your soul. Twisted and confused, you will do as you are told and "think" it's your own free will that guides you. Fake, fake, fake.

[TheLegendaryLinx]

@Mainsail76 Fake Dutch 'moon rock' revealed A treasured piece at the Dutch national museum - a supposed moon rock from the first manned lunar landing - is nothing more than petrified wood, curators say.

It was given to former Prime Minister Willem Drees during a goodwill tour by the three Apollo-11 astronauts shortly after their moon mission in 1969.

So much for your beloved Moon Rocks.Anyways... NASA I DARE U to go back to the moon and show the original Apollo hardware... CASE CLOSED

[Mainsail76]

@TheLegendaryLinx Wrong. That wasn't given to the Prime Minister by the Apollo 11 astronauts. It was given by the US ambassador William Middendorf. It wasn't sanctioned by NASA or the US government. Nice try though at your internet detective skills. Maybe you should do a little more research. So now we've gone from the moon rocks being lunar meteorites, to petrified wood. What will you claim next?

[Mainsail76]

@TheLegendaryLinx According to your logic, if you find a fake, it somehow proves that the original isn't real. Han van Meegeren was a famous art forger. He painted "Supper at Emmaus" which was done in the style of Johannes Vermeer. Many were fooled by this fake. By your logic, since this "Supper at Emmaus" was proven fake, then we must assume that Johannes Vermeer never existed and never made any paintings.

[akirafactor]

The US never landed anyone on the moon, they built the world's largest movie set on an army base.

[iiTudy]

@akirafactor I used to think that too, but then again the USSR were keeping a very close eye on them and if they would've faked it, the soviets would've jumped to the occasion to discredit america and show what big frauds they are and that would've made a fool out of the US and dramatically weaken their image. So it's either they landed on the moon, or for some reason the USSR covered it up too and declared the US victorious... which is hilarious to think. - Just something to think about.

[akirafactor]

@iiTudy The Russian scientists stated they did not believe NASA, because no one could show how NASA got through the Van Allen Belt alive. No one has with off the shelf technology even until today.

Oh, and the US built the world's biggest movie sets on military bases to film the moon landing. They were even listed in Guiness book of world records for largest sound stages in the world. Those sets were also built right before the supposed moon landing, coincidence?

[TheLegendaryLinx]

@Mainsail76 Oh gosh here we go again... How sure are you with those Lunar Rocks?? What if they are Lunar Meteorites?? Oh thats right... you didnt think about that one did you? We can go back & forth all day long.. Only way for the truth to come out is for NASA to go back to the moon and show the world the original hardware.. CASE CLOSED!!!!!!

[Mainsail76]

@TheLegendaryLinx Hah! Lunar meteorites! That's the best one yet.  The big hoax just gets bigger and bigger to explain away logical facts that can't be denied. Once again, I guess experienced schooled geologists and scientists can't tell the difference between a meteorite and a lunar rock. And I guess lunar soil and core samples fall from the sky too. Yes, geologists and scientist the world over, including the old Soviet Union, are fooled by lunar meteorites and beach sand. You're funny.

[TheLegendaryLinx]

@Mainsail76  The only sure way to prove the moon landings really happened is to return to the Moon and show the people the Apollo hardware you bird brain! That would surely put an end to all this crap... I like to believe we did landed on the moon but mounting evidence makes me question otherwise... Which leads back to my original statement.... I DARE NASA TO RETURN TO THE MOON!!!!!!

[Mainsail76]

@TheLegendaryLinx Bird brain? Are you in the first grade? Just ask the thousands of geologists around the world over the last 40 years that have studied the moon rocks, soil samples, and core samples that the astronauts brought back. I guess they're all in on the big hoax too. Or maybe all of these geologists and scientists that went through years of education and field work aren't as smart as you, right? I guess they're too dumb to know the difference between fake rocks and real rocks.

[TheLegendaryLinx]

I DARE NASA TO GO BACK TO THE MOON... PROVE TO THE WORLD WE WERE THERE 6 TIMES DURING THE NIXON ERA... (TRICKY DICK) HEHEHE...NATIONS AROUND THE WORLD NOW HAVE THE PROPER EQUIPMENT TO TRACK A TRUE MOON LANDING... COMMON NASA PROVE THEM WRONG!!!

[Mainsail76]

@TheLegendaryLinx If they went back to the moon again, wouldn't you just say they were hoaxing it again? Also, nations had the equipment back in the 60's and 70's to track the missions. The technology to track a spacecraft and it's communications hasn't changed in 50 years. You need to do more research before commenting, but your all caps post pretty much tells me all I need to know about you.

[BeardedCIam]

@johnsenkenn, Sorry but several recent lunar orbiting surveyors have sent back clear images of the Apollo landing sites showing the descent stages,experiment packages,lunar rover tracks & even some foot trails. You can Google them.

[valerchi007]

why Americans use a stranger technique? Who did let them?

[Diatonic5th]

The "moon" is nothing more than an elaborate holograph that the NWO built during the Mesozoic Era. You can't land on it because it doesn't exist! All human knowledge is a lie!

[skaternoxie]

@goddifist

we've never been outside the galaxy dude... not even the solar system

[johnsenkenn]

@skaternoxie

Not even on the Moon, never out of the Van Allen belt.

[oberon4ik]

Ураа! Луноход-2 нашли!

[mcclir]

@oberon4ik Great to see the Lunokhods on the moon.

[valerchi007]

@oberon4ik Не просто нашли, а нашли, украли и пользуются.

[rekkapower]

ok a radiator works by air flowing through the fins which dissipates liquid heat. There is no air in space. wtf.

[a7green]

....... All I saw was an arrow pointing at a dark grey circle.

[6americanflagsonmoon]

the moon has 14 solid days of daytime and its hot!...then 14 solid days of nighttime when its dark (but lit by strong blue earthlight from planet earth reflecting sunlight)...death to the ussr and red communists everywhere!

[valerchi007]

@6americanflagsonmoon  Communists have made the reliable good technics which works till now. And in America there is no such technics!

[6americanflagsonmoon]

@neso1991...america has 6 flags on earths moon luna...it is our property like alaska!...your junk rover is tresspassing on our american moon!...more soviet junk!.../ wisconsin

[spliffthedog]

no one owns the moon it is for the people of earth dipshit and if it wasnt for the nazis you would not have got to the moon

[joesub007]

@6americanflagsonmoon Nasa faked it. Nasa used Nazi war criminals mass murderers as their "scientists". They didn't land on the moon.

[thunderwh]

The average daytime temperature on the Moon is around 107°C (225°F).

[Dyhalto10]

Can't wait to see an empty Coca Cola can on the moon.

Or a Tim Hortons cup with the Roll-Up-The-Rim saying "Please Play Again".

[ENJOYOURMATRIXX]

watch : moon rising on youtube

[Neso1991]

Why don't they find the equipment used by Neil Armstrong and the rest of the crew? Haha..stupid Americans never went to the moon..they couldn't even get off the ground! That is why they use Russian made rockets..NASA is a failure!

[mcclir]

@Neso1991 They did!

[TREFIVE]

if space is cold as they claim how come that thing over heated.

[SurvivalWithBushcraf]

Terrific point! And the picture did not even look like anything. I guess they have a more viewed version.

[jfcrow1]

Vacuum is a very good insulator.

[Malphar]

@TREFIVE its called friction

[TREFIVE]

@Malphar dude, there is no air resistance in space, you need drag to create friction

[Mainsail76]

@TREFIVE In direct sunlight on the moon it is extremely hot. In shadow on the moon it is extremely cold. That is also how it is in space. If a spaceship is going to the moon, it has to spin as it travels there so that one side doesn't face the sun too long and one side doesn't stay in the dark too long. Otherwise, one side of the spaceship would bake, and the other would freeze.

[VancouverCanucksRock]

@Mainsail76 shake n bake

[johnsenkenn]

@Mainsail76

Right, and that means you will cook in the sun on the Moon, and so you will in space, there you are in direct sun shine. So what is this rubbish about Appolo 13. This Moon landing is a scam.

[Mainsail76]

@johnsenkenn You won't "cook" on the moon if you're wearing a space suit. The suits have cooling tubes that circulate cool water around the astronauts as well as protective insulation. Do the astronauts that work outside of the ISS "cook," or do you believe that that is also a grand international hoax? I can't help if you don't understand basic science that you should have learned as a child in school. I glad I'm smart, it means it's easier to control silly cavemen like you. Knowledge is power.

[johnsenkenn]

@Mainsail76

Ahhh....you are clever, have a shrink told you that, you should see one, you would get wiser. No you won't cook in a cooled space suit, but where is the energy to cool the Moon lander and the space suit coming from. No the astronauts there work outside the ISS do not cook, but they are cooled. The point was if they were not cooled they would cook, and the Apollo 13 was not cooled, according to your fairy tale story they ran out off energy, right.

[Mainsail76]

@johnsenkenn So now you're saying you won't cook. Earlier you said you would cook, and that is why you believe the moon landings were a hoax. Can you not make up your mind? The energy source to cool the space suit was located in the big back pack that the astronauts wore. The lander was full of equipment to keep it cool, after all, it was a spacecraft. It had large batteries and fuel cells that powered it. It was also covered in insulating foil that protected it from the direct sunlight.

[Mainsail76]

@johnsenkenn I don't know what you're talking about in terms of your obsession with Apollo 13. Apollo 13 had an explosion which damaged the spacecraft, but it didn't "run out of energy" whatever that means. The thrusters and engines still worked on the spacecraft, so they were able to keep the spacecraft in a role to keep it at an even temp. There is no resistance in space because it is a vacuum, so once something is put in motion, it will continue in that motion. This is all very simple.

[johnsenkenn]

@Mainsail76

You are right, knowledge are power, that's why dumb-fuck like you are ruled by the clever people, the state people.

[Mainsail76]

@johnsenkenn Maybe I'm the clever one. From your primitive use of the word "fuck," I can tell you're not very smart. Only stupid people have to cuss, because they are not smart enough to explain their thoughts. You cannot explain yourself properly, so you get mad and call someone a "dumb-fuck." Of course, you would never say such a thing to my face, because not only are you uneducated, you are also a coward. It's easy to attack on the internet, that doesn't take much courage. Small man.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 What ridiculous BS. When you take heating away from the metal on the dark side it stays hot for a very long time. That is how a thermos bottle works. A vacuum is a powerful insulator and does not cool at all. You actually need atmosphere to cool something. That is why you cool something hot by blowing on it and keep it hot by putting it in a vacuum thermos bottle.

Mainsail76, a damn pseudo intellectual spouting his BS opinions as science fact.

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor Yes, that's why as I pointed out, the spacecraft were covered in a insulated material such as metallized mylar foil in the case of the LM. If you look at the CM/SM, you'll see that they are covered in a reflective silver material. These reflective surfaces greatly reduce the transfer of radiant energy. Along with other passive forms of cooling such as the "roll," and mechanical means such as internal and external radiators, keeping the spacecraft cool wasn't difficult.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Really, radiators. Radiators need atmosphere to function. That is why they are located in the front of a vehicle with a fan behind it push ~air~ through it for cooling. A radiator in a vacuum would be a thermos bottle retaining heat.

Why don't you explain how they got through the Van Allen Belt while your at it. Easy one, since they never did.

Mainsail76, king of the pseudo intellectuals.

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor No, radiators in space and automobile radiators aren't the same. Space radiators use infrared heat radiation to dissipate the heat where as an automobile radiator uses convection. If you want to see a space radiator, look at the interior lining of the space shuttle cargo bay doors. Those are lined with large radiators. That's why the shuttle must keep it's cargo bay doors open during the entire mission. That's one of the ways it keeps cool. Apollo had these on the Service Module.

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor Apollo astronauts usually spent less than two hours traveling through the Van Allen Belt. Their exposure to the radiation was small. Remember,  radiation is only deadly in large doses either all at once, or smaller doses over a long period of time. We are exposed to radiation every second of our lives, the radiation isn't like poison gas that kills you with one exposure.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Keep talking, you might convince yourself.

No human has gone through the Van Allen Belt alive using technology available even today.

In the fake Apollo tapes they complain how cold it is and they needed heaters, BS. Acuality is its quite hot in sunlight and they would need cooling which you admitted on the space shuttle. Spacesuits are liquid cooled.

Why would anyone go to the Moon 6+ times to the same spot? Easy answer, they only had one set.

Mainsail76, just another NASA shill

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor No, the Apollo astronauts visited six regions, all very different. The fact that you don't understand this, and believe that they visited the same spot shows that you need to study the subject more. Apollo 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 all went through the Van Allen belt, and they all lived. This is a historical and scientific fact understood by all normal people. James Van Allen himself knew this to be a fact. Van Allen would have known if it weren't possible.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 ROFL, normal people are idiots.

More massive NASA fake Apollo mission mistakes:

How about the missing blast crater under the lander.

How about the absolutely clean foil on the lander's legs, not one speck of dust after a rocket burn.

How about all those "Moon Rocks" from NASA that turned out to be petrified wood.

How about all the contaminated sealed containers from the Moon, because they are filled with regular Earth dirt.

Apollo Moon Landing, biggest hoax ever!

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor So when I prove you wrong on each point you've made prior, you just move on to the next? I suppose I could write you a thesis, but since fact and reality tend not to be one of your strong points, that would be a waste of time for both of us.

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor The LM engine was throttled back before landing. You must remember that the engine nozzle was over 54 inches wide, so this spread the "blast" over a large area. The thrust generated only about 1.5 pounds per square inch. This combined with the fact that in a vacuum the blast would spread out. Thus no "crater." Also, on the bottom of the LM landing pad, there was landing sensor that hung down about 2 feet. When this sensor made contact, the engine shut off prior to actual landing

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Wrong, the Moon has a thin atmosphere visible even with a telescope.

You forgot the most famous mistake. NASA stated Apollo used film cameras and you have this massive error that shows the module take-off from the Moon Set back to earth.

Problem, who is recording the launch and how did the launch film get back to Earth? You just stated they went to different places even though they only used one Moon Set. UPS went to the Moon to pick up the film?

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor You're joking right? The Apollo missions used both film and video. You didn't know that? You can't tell the difference between video and film images? The images taken of the accent stage of the LM lifting off was done during the last three J missions. The video camera was on the rover. You don't have to physically send the video back to earth friend. You can transmit it back to earth. You know, the same way live events are shown. I'm sorry that you can't understand that.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Funny, video cameras. It's all film footage, also no video or audio feed was ever detected coming from the Moon during the filming of the "Moon Landing" episodes. Fort Mead did try to broadcast a fake landing audio feed though.

Apollo "Moon Landing," Greatest Hoax of the Modern Era!

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor Look, if your going to dispute fact, there just isn't too much more to say to you. It's not all film footage. Even most moon hoax guys will say you're wrong about that one. You can't deny video vs. film. One is clearly video, and the other is clearly film. Google image a lunar rover. In the front, you'll see the video camera. Next to the camera is an umbrella shaped antenna. Those are the facts. Look at the footage. Some is film, some video. That's the fact.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 A Digital Video Feed didn't happen. Magnetic tape on set is possible, but all they produce is film.

I've asked guys face to face that worked on the "Moon Landing" episodes. They do not answer questions about all the errors in production. They just stare or change the subject. Hoax badly executed.

Apollo "Moon Landing," Biggest Fraud since Piltdown Man!

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor They didn't even have digital video back then. They transmitted the video via wideband FM. The first few Apollo missions used SSTV (slow scan) for the surface video. That's why it was poor quality black and white. The latter missions used GCTA (ground commanded television assembly.) People around the world watched the landings live. They couldn't have watched live film. There's no such thing. Only TV can be transmitted live. NASA couldn't have fooled TV stations around the world.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 That was never a live feed of the landing, even NASA does not dispute this info. The original landing on television in black and white was a network television camera point at a tv set displaying the landing NASA was showing. Why in the world would they point a camera at a tv? Simple, it was a replay of their edited final footage with the fake audio feed broadcast from Fort Mead.

No observatory ever sighted the capsule at the Moon. No signal was received from the Moon, only Ft. Mead

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor No, they didn't point a TV camera at a television set. Give me a break. Do you really think that Nasa is going to put together this big hoax involving over 1 million people around the world, and then do something as amateur as point a camera at a TV? I prove you wrong, you just go to another accusation that can't be proven. The difference is that I give you fact that can be checked, you on the other hand just invent something else. Prove that they pointed a camera at a TV.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Obviously you don't know what your talking about. NASA's own master tapes are in color. Moon landing was broadcast in B/W. Also take a good look at the edges of the screen of the archive footage and you see the curved edges of the TV set the network camera is pointed at. Those are all documented facts in all the archive network footage and documentaries.

And that video link show them faking it v=y1tqZyZVoDM

Show NASA faking records during the Apollo mission while in orbit.

[starview1]

@akirafactor The moon landings were real as advertised, recently the LRO photographed the tracks left on the moon by the lunar rovers from apollo, then there's the British radar that tracked the apollo to the moon surface, then there are the 1000's of photos taken on the moon by the astronauts,then there are the lunar rock samples some of which only recently have had there composition revealed,as they remained a mystery for some 30 years.

[jrm21386]

@starview1 Bravo. Although nothing will convince all the tin-foil hat wearing, idiot conspiracy theorists out there. Even the Soviet Union tracked the US lunar lander before it touched down on the moons surface. Let's face it: If the US faked the lunar landings the Soviet Union would be the first to call foul. Even the Soviets admitted the lunar landing occurred.

[sattanhellsing]

@jrm21386 you are an idiotic brainwashed fool . so kindly fuck off . 

[jrm21386]

@sattanhellsing Thank for your valuable contribution to this conversation...now if you don't mind the adults will continue talking above your head. BTW, only those with nothing serious to offer, result to insults and personal attacks. Leave the immaturity at home please.

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor No telescope on earth is capable of seeing an object such as the LM on the surface of the moon. The data feed was coming in for all to receive. The Soviets, the Chinese, whomever. They knew it was coming from space, because they had to set their antennas up to pick up the data feed from space. It wasn't terrestrial in it's source. Those are the provable facts. You can automatically claim otherwise, but those are the proven facts. Something either comes from space or doesn't.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 As I said, counterfeit audio feed from Fort Mead. No video feed at all from anywhere.

Apollo "Moon Landings," Greatest Hoax of Modern Human History

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 The original video/audio quality was so bad that no one could make out anything even remotely suspicious beyond the network camera pointed at a TV being an odd setup. NASA did make some movie about how one observatory in the whole world heard the live audio feed. Of course that story conflicts with everyone that heard the counterfeit audio feed from Fort Mead.

Basically NASA is so deep in the deception that they can no longer keep their lies straight. New lies conflict with old ones

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor I've addressed the "petrified" wood in a previous comment down below. It isn't a case of "all of those" as you've stated.  Dust wouldn't have stuck to the gold foil mylar as it would a fabric covered space suit. Throw some sand on a piece of foil, and you'll see this fact for yourself. Remember, moon soil is in fact small fine grains of sand like material. Even if there were some soiling of the foil, you wouldn't really be able to tell from the 35mm film.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Why don't you give me the coordinates to the rovers and landers used in Apollo on the Moon set. Both Clementine and Japanese Radar missions recorded the Moon up close.

Also this story itself shows the US rovers and landers should be visible by satellite or observatory if they in fact existed on the real Moon.

Apollo "Moon Landing," biggest hoax in modern human history!

I can use your thesis to wax my car. Russian rover on the Moon found. US junk doesn't even exist.

[Mainsail76]

@akirafactor Apollo 15- 26 degrees 06'03" N 03 degrees 39'10" E

Apollo 16- 8 degrees 59'29" S 15 degrees 30'52" E

Apollo 17- 20 degrees 9'55" N 30 degrees 45'57" E

These are the coordinates of the last three J missions. Those are the three missions that used rovers. Oh, also, it's not good to wax your car with paper, you might scratch the clear coat finish. Instead, use something soft like terry cloth.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Thanks, time to go file FOIA requests with NASA for specific footage.

NASA has already been caught multiple times releasing edited photos that conflict with their own original badly edited photos. Like the famous Fraudulent "Jumping Astronaut." Of course the hilarious disappearing grids.

Apollo "Moon Landing," Biggest Hoax in Modern History!

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Hey NASA shill, you just screwed up. Even you just talked about how much cooling it takes in a vacuum to keep them from cooking from just body heat. Spacesuits are liquid cooled also.

Here is a huge error in the Moon Landing Fake Trash Tapes. Watch that Apollo footage and they complain how cold it is and they needed to run heaters to keep warm. Spacesuits now are liquid cooled, yet they complain how cold, not how hot it is. I call BS again NASA shill.

[akirafactor]

@Mainsail76 Hilarious that the astronauts complained it was freezing on camera, and of camera they just float around in t-shirts in Earth orbit while faking their lunar camera shot.

[SeleNazzy]

@TREFIVE dark side of the moon is cold.

sunny side isn't.

Have in mind that moon is still very close to sun . if you were near pluton , no mather if you were on sunny side or not , temps would be close to absolute 0

[akirafactor]

@TREFIVE A vacuum is a near perfect insulator. Its how a thermos bottle works which world make space very hot to work in.

[sniper6081]

For the rest of time. Once we get on the moon somebody's going to retrieve it and put it in a museum.

[sniper6081]

Forgot the "?" at the end of the first sentence.

[vacinestoxic]

We know the Soviets landed on the moon

w/o people.

The U.S. hasn't shown the world the telescopic

photos of all the debris from six moon

landings. Why? Because the U.S. did not

land on the moon.

[goddifist]

@ vacinestoxic

but we sure as hell made it to mars, found water on the moon, made it outside the galaxy, found a second earth, made the hubble space telescope and many more

so who cares

[welcomegohome]

How is this news?

[DigitalGrotto]

Yes but can he find Martin Landau?

[flookzakub7]

omg OVER HEAT ???????? WOW

[easyvalleyrd]

I am no "Mooner".... But sometimes "Common Since" clashes with "Scripted Fiction"...

Where is Apollo???

Did its radiator get clogged as well....

They must have Larry The Cable Guy writing this stuff....

[easyvalleyrd]

Wait a minute.. did she say the radiator got clogged? HUM? Was it a combustion engine, how no atmosphere?

With sub-zero temps, how could it run hot?

[gullette777]

that is a good point

[kricke243]

Just for info: "Radiators" is used for cooling and heating. Most of them are used in automobiles, buildings, and electronics. A heat sink on the cpu in your computer is a radiator. Is you CPU a combustion engine?

Temperature on moon can reach 390 K at the equator (~+115 degrees C), but stuff can overheat in a lot less than that, particularly if it is in a protected atmosphere.

[StrEagle]

For those that think we never made it to the moon - there's a piece of mirror on the moon, put there by astronauts, so ppl from Earth can shoot a lasor to that mirror, and record the time it takes the beam to bounce back from the mirror and get back to earth - thus measuring the distance. If you have a powerful laser, you can too shoot at that point on the moon and get back a reflected beam, thus proving we got there..

[noordwinter]

a machine could have put that there, doesn't prove anything..

[graphattic]

Although I am not convinced by either side on this matter, do keep in mind that an unmanned vehicle can do that just the same. So do not use that as an arguement.

[krum369]

lol

[EXOMATRlXTV]

Stanley Kubrick helped Nasa ;) and used partial Russian unmanned probes who DID go to the moon footages mixed it with studio effects artificial lights multiple angles the dumbest mistake (long+short shadows not only due to the ''hills'' effect) blackened skylines due to scientist figuring out the exact time windows NOT correlating with the facts, thus they censor the stars. 1000s of perfect focused pictures is almost impossible with body camera that was used.

(this is just the tip of an icberg)

[kricke243]

"they censor the stars"

If you knew anything about photography you would know that no camera has the dynamic range that produces not overexposed details in sunlight, and simultaneously not underexposed details in a black sky (stars). That is why the image format HDR was created - made from many pictures with different exposures.

Take a picture at night, with a light equivalent of sunlight on a person in white clothes, not overexposed, and in the same picture capture the stars not underexposed.

[EXOMATRlXTV]

@kricke243 you obvious did not do your homework, am used to lazy armchair critics (pseudo skeptics trying to "debunk" real skeptics)

[vacinestoxic]

EXOMATRIXTV----Maybe Russia Today is going

to "out" the U.S. Moon Landing Hoax. Thsi story

is simply toying with NASA. I understand to be

an astronaut you must be in the CIA or NSA.

Any info?

[javabeserk]

does anyone knows where did the Americans landed on the moon...anyone? pls..?

[gordonculp]

@javabeserk they didn't

[noordwinter]

sea of tranquility

[vacinestoxic]

javabeserk----Yes, Where is all the debris from all

SIX supposed moon landings? Funny how

telescopes can see light years away but

NEVER have we seen photographic evidence

of a "Moon Landing."

If the U.S. Criminal Cartel did land on the

moon, there would be a McDonald's up there.

[vacinestoxic]

javaberserk----No one knows because no did

land on the moon. Where is the photographic

evidence using a telescope showing us?

If the U.S. landed on the moon they would

have constructed a McDonalds. :-)

[abyssfan83]

@vacinestoxic hit up the LRO mission page sometime.

[MrArmin88]

da konechnoo

[legalizethegreen]

Pink Floyd released Dark Side of The Moon in 1973

[btigtime2]

Because we did not go to the moon. Our Land rover is in a Californian landfill.

[EXOMATRlXTV]

Stanley Kubrick helped Nasa ;) and used partial Russian unmanned probes who DID go to the moon footages mixed it with studio effects artificial lights multiple angles the dumbest mistake (long+short shadows not only due to the ''hills'' effect) blackened skylines due to scientist figuring out the exact time windows NOT correlating with the facts, thus they censor the stars. 1000s of perfect focused pictures is almost impossible with body camera that was used.

(this is just the tip of an icberg)

[yuriythebest]

according to scientists "for the rest of time" oh are they so smart that they can see 100-200 years into the future?

[NATEandtheMONKEY]

hope we have more than 1-200 years :)

[903harman]

there saying there not going to spend the money and time just to get that rover :/...

[Squirelbutt]

So I didnt see anything. If we can find these things with powerful telescopes. Why hasnt anyone filmed our rover on the moon?

[noordwinter]

exactly

[robcat2075]

@Squirelbutt short answer... they have.

[Squirelbutt]

@robcat2075 show proof?

[robcat2075]

@Squirelbutt If you're not bright enough to find the obvious out there, nothing I can do will help.

You picked "Squirelbutt" for a screenname. That should have clued me in right away.

[Squirelbutt]

@robcat2075 you talk shit no proof just claims.