Good for the teacher and the class. It's a shame that she was attacked for opposing War. I guess it is better to promote war than to oppose it even though our misguided adventures have cost us trillions of dollars and countless lives, and have done more to create more enemies than to make us safe. It's a shame that we are a war nation. Germany was a war nation too, and look how that turned out. Nations that live by the sword all die by the sword. The US will probably be no exception...
@NightriderXP1 I looked at your page and just going by what you've posted I can why you had to do a "Godwin" at the end. Good job hater! This teacher was not attacked for opposing the war, I exposed the fact that she is indoctrinating children, then bringing them to a church to have them spread it, (Something that would be front page on Crooks & Liars if a Tea Partier did it) I am exposing the fact that she is using old style propaganda on children who are too young to know better.
I realize that you would prefer that this teacher taught her students to believe, like the other teachers do, in perpetual war & not tell the kids that war is brutal and that wars kill and injure many people & that entire communities & countries & families are damaged for generations after these wars. War is glorious and the kids should be kept in lockstep with your right wing views. God forbid if we didn't indoctrinate them to believe that we're right to have troops deployed in 150 countries.
@NightriderXP1@NightriderXP1 The History of War in America is one of necessity, not empire as the left and you believe. We stand in 150 countries with, a few recent exceptions, as a protector not conquers. We do not take from people, we share with them. We stand for peace against those who would enslave the world under a cruel ruthless social tyranny. I believe you would like to see this come but only because you do not understand how the promises of communism can only lead to tyranny
I see that you're still fighting the Cold War. The USSR collapsed in the 80s. Why do we need 60K troops in Germany & 30K troops in Japan? We have 1,379,551 troops deployed in 150 countries. I bet we wouldn't like it if the Germans, Russians, French, etc had military bases & troops stationed here. We are occupiers. Iraq was a War of Choice, so was Vietnam. We should be teaching our children to learn from history, not repeat it. You preach war, I preach peace. I applaud the Peacemakers...
But in Iraq and in the other 149 countries we have a presence in, treaty state that we leave upon request. Not one government has made that request. In fact they rely on our forces rather than fear them. We are the “Peace” of the World without the US there would be war unstoppable in fact with our forces engaged and our government unengaged we see the weakness of the World We see the rise of tyrants within the world body. We see the loss of freedom in Europe as we speak, and yes we see it here.
The invasion of Iraq & Vietnam were both Wars of Choice. We spend a lot of our treasure and lose a lot of our soldiers in these misadventures, yet they never seem to end. When was the last time the US won a war? WE are a war nation because we have a Military Industrial Complex that needs to be constantly fed. The only way to feed the machine is to wage continuous and endless war. Nationalism is used to promote these adventures. "Fascism Comes Wrapped In A Flag, Carrying A Cross" - Ron Paul
@NightriderXP1 We won in Vietnam in 1972 we brought the North to heel and they signed the Paris accords, in 1974 the democratic congress withdrew funding for the south and with that sign of weakness the north abandoned their treaty obligations and invaded the south. We won in Iraq, or did you forget that? We are winning again, why do you think the news doesn't report it anymore? We had to fight communism in Vietnam, just like we had to in Korea. Ron Paul is a nut, with a few good ideals
After losing 60K men in Vietnam, we cut & run. In Lebanon, we cut & run after our barracks were bombed. Iraq will become an Iranian ally. We haven't won anything there. The war goes on. In Afghanistan, there are fewer than 100 Al Qaeda yet we have over 100K troops fighting & dying there every day. The Korean war has never ended either. We keep wasting our treasure & troops on these wars yet, they never end. Unfortunately, RP's crazy observations about Nationality & Fascism are spot on...
@NightriderXP1 From '72 to 74 no Americans lives were lost to hostile action. We had won, but not to worry the democrats had promised to abandon the South (as relayed to the North via John Kerry at Paris) So the North just waited for the Democrats to keep their promise. Look it up RP's observations about fascism are spot on only if you don't understand fascism. We keep killing them but if there is only 100 of them (taliban anyone) you would think they would run out of people. Panetta is a joke.
You must have been home schooled. I lived through this:
Watch the Fall of Saigon 1975: watch?v=IdR2Iktffaw
American Vietnam War-Related Deaths by War Years and Post-War:
1972 - 641
1973 - 168
1974 - 178
WE demanded the end to the Vietnam war and Nixon campaigned that he would get us out. He promised the North Vietnamese that we would pull out. Once we did, the North Vietnamese took total control over the entire country. We won?
@NightriderXP1 The Paris Peace Accords of 1973, signed in January by March 1973 the last American combat soldiers left South Vietnam, though military advisors and Marines, who are protecting U.S. installations, remain. For the United States, the war was officially over. No Americans lives were lost to HOSTILE ACTION from the last months of 72 till the last push from the North and the fall of Saigon
perhaps you need a bit of home schooling, they score better on all test
You seem to naively believe that Al Qaeda and the Taliban are one in the same. They are not. It was Al Qaeda that attacked us on 911, not the Taliban nor Saddam Hussein. You might want to brush up on who is who and who did what. I bet you don't even know the difference between the Sunnis and Shias...
@NightriderXP1 We went in to oust the Taliban for their refusal to stop rendering aid to Al Qaeda, aside from the fact that they are a murderous backwards regime of woman hating troglodytes. The difference between the Sunnis and Shias is that they will and have joined forces to fight those they feel threaten Islam, (real or imagined) is largely based on whether a elected leader or appointed leader should rule over Islam.
The Taliban is a Conservative Religious political organization. They ran the govt of Afghanistan & refused to extradite bin Laden to us until we provided evidence that he was involved in the 911 attacks. We refused to do so but instead invaded Afghanistan. Al Qaeda is mostly gone there now, which was the original intent of the mission. Due to Mission Creep, we're now fighting the Taliban. The Taliban didn't attack us, so why would we continue fighting them? We'll never kill them all...
@NightriderXP1 Fighting the Taliban is not mission creep, that mission was laid down in October when it became clear the Taliban was not going to comply with our demands, There is no doubt then or now that Osama planed and order the attacks from Afghanistan with Taliban consent and aid. The Taliban’s request for evidence was just a delaying ploy.
The Taliban had nothing to do with the planning of the 911 attacks. If any country made demands to the US to turn over ppl living here w/o providing evidence of gult, do you think the US would comply with those demands? WE WOULD NOT. The Taliban had every right to expect proof before extraditing bin Laden. GW decided to invade Afghanistan instead. The mission was to capture bin Laden & destroy Al Qaeda, not to destroy the Taliban. Do you know how many nations have failed in Afghanistan???
@NightriderXP1 I said "consent and aid" not "planning" although the difference is more semantics then anything. The Taliban government gave safe haven to Osama bin Laden before and after the attack, they had refused to turn him over in February of that year for his many other crimes we gave them proof the rejected it. al-Qaeda had an untenably close relationship with the Taliban. Remember the Bush Doctrine, "We will make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them"
Afghanistan is a pretty lawless country. Many groups could set up camp there without full knowledge by the govt. They can do that here in the US too. In fact, there are militias popping up all over this country & many may be planning Oklahoma City like bombings of their own. Should the US govt be held responsible for the nuts who reside here? You're blaming the Taliban for things they didn't control. The Taliban asked for proof of guilt before extraditing. Instead, we invaded...
@NightriderXP1 The Taliban made clear that Osama was not some lawless outsider working without its knowledge, but an invited guess who had their support and encouragement, why is this distinction so hard to grasp?
You're trying to rewrite history. Granted, the Taliban is an extreme group. They're a Conservative religious group that felt it had a right to impose its views on those who didn't share them, kind of like the religious right here except at a greater extreme. The Taliban was destroying ancient archeology too. But since you don't remember or refuse to believe, the Taliban asked for evidence of guilt. The US would demand evidence too if a nation demanded extradition of anyone residing here...
How did you get "schools against the war" out of "children for peace?" Do you think it's wrong for children to be for peace? Are you saying that children should be for war, not peace?
Actually I take that back about liking your videos. After watching more of them I realize that your sensitivity expressed in some of them is not sincere.
You cabn complain to the ACLU on this. The ACLU uaually will only take up a fight when there is a complaint. They have mentioned this publicly before.
Well that is one difference we don't turn to lawyers to stop things we don't like. We deal with it. We make it known, we work to change minds not laws, we persuade by augment not by force of law.
Exactly why they have had to lower the standards for all public schools nationwide since 1995, about three times. They spend more time eating, snacking, doing art and crafts, and crap like this, than educating children now. Not to mention the pedophile teachers, and the tramp stamp hoe teachers as well. They tell us in college, if we fail at our majors, we can always become public school teachers.
Good for the teacher and the class. It's a shame that she was attacked for opposing War. I guess it is better to promote war than to oppose it even though our misguided adventures have cost us trillions of dollars and countless lives, and have done more to create more enemies than to make us safe. It's a shame that we are a war nation. Germany was a war nation too, and look how that turned out. Nations that live by the sword all die by the sword. The US will probably be no exception...
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 I looked at your page and just going by what you've posted I can why you had to do a "Godwin" at the end. Good job hater! This teacher was not attacked for opposing the war, I exposed the fact that she is indoctrinating children, then bringing them to a church to have them spread it, (Something that would be front page on Crooks & Liars if a Tea Partier did it) I am exposing the fact that she is using old style propaganda on children who are too young to know better.
fartohard 1 year ago
I realize that you would prefer that this teacher taught her students to believe, like the other teachers do, in perpetual war & not tell the kids that war is brutal and that wars kill and injure many people & that entire communities & countries & families are damaged for generations after these wars. War is glorious and the kids should be kept in lockstep with your right wing views. God forbid if we didn't indoctrinate them to believe that we're right to have troops deployed in 150 countries.
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 @NightriderXP1 The History of War in America is one of necessity, not empire as the left and you believe. We stand in 150 countries with, a few recent exceptions, as a protector not conquers. We do not take from people, we share with them. We stand for peace against those who would enslave the world under a cruel ruthless social tyranny. I believe you would like to see this come but only because you do not understand how the promises of communism can only lead to tyranny
fartohard 1 year ago
I see that you're still fighting the Cold War. The USSR collapsed in the 80s. Why do we need 60K troops in Germany & 30K troops in Japan? We have 1,379,551 troops deployed in 150 countries. I bet we wouldn't like it if the Germans, Russians, French, etc had military bases & troops stationed here. We are occupiers. Iraq was a War of Choice, so was Vietnam. We should be teaching our children to learn from history, not repeat it. You preach war, I preach peace. I applaud the Peacemakers...
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
But in Iraq and in the other 149 countries we have a presence in, treaty state that we leave upon request. Not one government has made that request. In fact they rely on our forces rather than fear them. We are the “Peace” of the World without the US there would be war unstoppable in fact with our forces engaged and our government unengaged we see the weakness of the World We see the rise of tyrants within the world body. We see the loss of freedom in Europe as we speak, and yes we see it here.
fartohard 1 year ago
The invasion of Iraq & Vietnam were both Wars of Choice. We spend a lot of our treasure and lose a lot of our soldiers in these misadventures, yet they never seem to end. When was the last time the US won a war? WE are a war nation because we have a Military Industrial Complex that needs to be constantly fed. The only way to feed the machine is to wage continuous and endless war. Nationalism is used to promote these adventures. "Fascism Comes Wrapped In A Flag, Carrying A Cross" - Ron Paul
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 We won in Vietnam in 1972 we brought the North to heel and they signed the Paris accords, in 1974 the democratic congress withdrew funding for the south and with that sign of weakness the north abandoned their treaty obligations and invaded the south. We won in Iraq, or did you forget that? We are winning again, why do you think the news doesn't report it anymore? We had to fight communism in Vietnam, just like we had to in Korea. Ron Paul is a nut, with a few good ideals
fartohard 1 year ago
After losing 60K men in Vietnam, we cut & run. In Lebanon, we cut & run after our barracks were bombed. Iraq will become an Iranian ally. We haven't won anything there. The war goes on. In Afghanistan, there are fewer than 100 Al Qaeda yet we have over 100K troops fighting & dying there every day. The Korean war has never ended either. We keep wasting our treasure & troops on these wars yet, they never end. Unfortunately, RP's crazy observations about Nationality & Fascism are spot on...
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 From '72 to 74 no Americans lives were lost to hostile action. We had won, but not to worry the democrats had promised to abandon the South (as relayed to the North via John Kerry at Paris) So the North just waited for the Democrats to keep their promise. Look it up RP's observations about fascism are spot on only if you don't understand fascism. We keep killing them but if there is only 100 of them (taliban anyone) you would think they would run out of people. Panetta is a joke.
fartohard 1 year ago
You must have been home schooled. I lived through this:
Watch the Fall of Saigon 1975: watch?v=IdR2Iktffaw
American Vietnam War-Related Deaths by War Years and Post-War:
1972 - 641
1973 - 168
1974 - 178
WE demanded the end to the Vietnam war and Nixon campaigned that he would get us out. He promised the North Vietnamese that we would pull out. Once we did, the North Vietnamese took total control over the entire country. We won?
President Richard Nixon: watch?v=IdR2Iktffaw
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 The Paris Peace Accords of 1973, signed in January by March 1973 the last American combat soldiers left South Vietnam, though military advisors and Marines, who are protecting U.S. installations, remain. For the United States, the war was officially over. No Americans lives were lost to HOSTILE ACTION from the last months of 72 till the last push from the North and the fall of Saigon
perhaps you need a bit of home schooling, they score better on all test
fartohard 1 year ago
You seem to naively believe that Al Qaeda and the Taliban are one in the same. They are not. It was Al Qaeda that attacked us on 911, not the Taliban nor Saddam Hussein. You might want to brush up on who is who and who did what. I bet you don't even know the difference between the Sunnis and Shias...
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 We went in to oust the Taliban for their refusal to stop rendering aid to Al Qaeda, aside from the fact that they are a murderous backwards regime of woman hating troglodytes. The difference between the Sunnis and Shias is that they will and have joined forces to fight those they feel threaten Islam, (real or imagined) is largely based on whether a elected leader or appointed leader should rule over Islam.
fartohard 1 year ago
The Taliban is a Conservative Religious political organization. They ran the govt of Afghanistan & refused to extradite bin Laden to us until we provided evidence that he was involved in the 911 attacks. We refused to do so but instead invaded Afghanistan. Al Qaeda is mostly gone there now, which was the original intent of the mission. Due to Mission Creep, we're now fighting the Taliban. The Taliban didn't attack us, so why would we continue fighting them? We'll never kill them all...
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 Fighting the Taliban is not mission creep, that mission was laid down in October when it became clear the Taliban was not going to comply with our demands, There is no doubt then or now that Osama planed and order the attacks from Afghanistan with Taliban consent and aid. The Taliban’s request for evidence was just a delaying ploy.
fartohard 1 year ago
The Taliban had nothing to do with the planning of the 911 attacks. If any country made demands to the US to turn over ppl living here w/o providing evidence of gult, do you think the US would comply with those demands? WE WOULD NOT. The Taliban had every right to expect proof before extraditing bin Laden. GW decided to invade Afghanistan instead. The mission was to capture bin Laden & destroy Al Qaeda, not to destroy the Taliban. Do you know how many nations have failed in Afghanistan???
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 I said "consent and aid" not "planning" although the difference is more semantics then anything. The Taliban government gave safe haven to Osama bin Laden before and after the attack, they had refused to turn him over in February of that year for his many other crimes we gave them proof the rejected it. al-Qaeda had an untenably close relationship with the Taliban. Remember the Bush Doctrine, "We will make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them"
fartohard 1 year ago
Afghanistan is a pretty lawless country. Many groups could set up camp there without full knowledge by the govt. They can do that here in the US too. In fact, there are militias popping up all over this country & many may be planning Oklahoma City like bombings of their own. Should the US govt be held responsible for the nuts who reside here? You're blaming the Taliban for things they didn't control. The Taliban asked for proof of guilt before extraditing. Instead, we invaded...
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@NightriderXP1 The Taliban made clear that Osama was not some lawless outsider working without its knowledge, but an invited guess who had their support and encouragement, why is this distinction so hard to grasp?
fartohard 1 year ago
You're trying to rewrite history. Granted, the Taliban is an extreme group. They're a Conservative religious group that felt it had a right to impose its views on those who didn't share them, kind of like the religious right here except at a greater extreme. The Taliban was destroying ancient archeology too. But since you don't remember or refuse to believe, the Taliban asked for evidence of guilt. The US would demand evidence too if a nation demanded extradition of anyone residing here...
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
@fartohard I'm curious. Are you an Atheist???
NightriderXP1 1 year ago
How did you get "schools against the war" out of "children for peace?" Do you think it's wrong for children to be for peace? Are you saying that children should be for war, not peace?
143tbone 4 years ago
The title was to make a point, don't you get it?
fartohard 3 years ago
Yes, I do. I don't know what my point was though when I wrote this. So sorry. I like your videos. Good work.
143tbone 3 years ago
Actually I take that back about liking your videos. After watching more of them I realize that your sensitivity expressed in some of them is not sincere.
143tbone 3 years ago
My sensitivity is in fact sincere. It just comes from a different point of view.
fartohard 3 years ago
You cabn complain to the ACLU on this. The ACLU uaually will only take up a fight when there is a complaint. They have mentioned this publicly before.
mrrimfire 4 years ago
Well that is one difference we don't turn to lawyers to stop things we don't like. We deal with it. We make it known, we work to change minds not laws, we persuade by augment not by force of law.
fartohard 3 years ago
Exactly why they have had to lower the standards for all public schools nationwide since 1995, about three times. They spend more time eating, snacking, doing art and crafts, and crap like this, than educating children now. Not to mention the pedophile teachers, and the tramp stamp hoe teachers as well. They tell us in college, if we fail at our majors, we can always become public school teachers.
di8oa 4 years ago
They cut classes and we pay for them with our tax dollars.
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago
Wonderful.
Young, uneducated, skulls full of mush have once again been brainwashed by the liberal elite, and I would say most against their parents' wishes.
Give me a break!
ToddonCapeCod 5 years ago