@martinyed They are pseudoscience to real scientists. Pseudoscientists are either incompetent or crooked, and non-scientists are not qualified to judge.
ok, it produces half of the amount of CO2 than gasoline, so it gives as 250 millions cars contaminating the world instead of 500 million......... nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quite: demonstrated to the satisfaction of those who are not capable of performing/evaluating the proper tests.
Or perhaps we are talking about 2 different things: is this still the magical fuel based upon atomic structures known only to Santilli, or has he now switched to conventional fuel production and is merely trading on his previous notoriety?
Yes, the volume of pseudoscience-based doctorates, papers, conferences, etc. will soon approach the numbers to be found in the paranormal field. Unfortunately, there is no reproducible experimental evidence for either. Certain theoreticians are rather naive, and will rush to explain 'evidence' without ever asking whether the evidence is genuine.
And on a practical note, you may be interested to know that Euromagnegas (Santilli's UK company) failed ignominiously.
I have been monitoring the antics of 'heterodox' academics for several decades. If it sounds like a crackpot and acts like a crackpot: it's a crackpot! Perhaps you ought to look more carefully at how legitimate science progresses before siding with the loony-tunes. Scientific opinion is swayed only by replicable experimental data. Santilli and his ilk never have any.
Are you in fact referring to the crackpot, Santilli, who has teamed up with another academic crackpot (Myron Evans) in an effort to fool those in positions of power (but with zero understanding of science) into thinking that they have discovered perpetual motion?
Comment removed
flowerbower 5 months ago
Comment removed
flowerbower 5 months ago
@martinyed They are pseudoscience to real scientists. Pseudoscientists are either incompetent or crooked, and non-scientists are not qualified to judge.
flowerbower 5 months ago
@flowerbower this proposal here you think average Americans is pseudoscience? thanks
martinyed 5 months ago
@martinyed I am not sure that I understand your question.
flowerbower 5 months ago
the stock is .19 cents... might be a money maker ??? mnga
martind586 10 months ago
@AscendingAngel777 you are strupid to think the raw food will not cure you. Very strupid, if that's the case.
camelsonhorizon 1 year ago
ok, it produces half of the amount of CO2 than gasoline, so it gives as 250 millions cars contaminating the world instead of 500 million......... nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
logann127 1 year ago
Quite: demonstrated to the satisfaction of those who are not capable of performing/evaluating the proper tests.
Or perhaps we are talking about 2 different things: is this still the magical fuel based upon atomic structures known only to Santilli, or has he now switched to conventional fuel production and is merely trading on his previous notoriety?
flowerbower 2 years ago
By paranormal, I was referring to the huge literature on telepathy, etc.; all of which has failed to yield a single reproducible experimental proof.
It is the same problem here: what is the point of ploughing through theory if there is no experimental evidence?
Euromagnegas is certainly not doing well; it was closed down by the UK's Companies House for, if I recall correctly, failing to file returns.
flowerbower 2 years ago
Yes, the volume of pseudoscience-based doctorates, papers, conferences, etc. will soon approach the numbers to be found in the paranormal field. Unfortunately, there is no reproducible experimental evidence for either. Certain theoreticians are rather naive, and will rush to explain 'evidence' without ever asking whether the evidence is genuine.
And on a practical note, you may be interested to know that Euromagnegas (Santilli's UK company) failed ignominiously.
flowerbower 2 years ago
I have been monitoring the antics of 'heterodox' academics for several decades. If it sounds like a crackpot and acts like a crackpot: it's a crackpot! Perhaps you ought to look more carefully at how legitimate science progresses before siding with the loony-tunes. Scientific opinion is swayed only by replicable experimental data. Santilli and his ilk never have any.
flowerbower 2 years ago
Are you in fact referring to the crackpot, Santilli, who has teamed up with another academic crackpot (Myron Evans) in an effort to fool those in positions of power (but with zero understanding of science) into thinking that they have discovered perpetual motion?
flowerbower 2 years ago
I'm glad this guy just keeps persisting. His concept is very good and I've been following him for years now.
aironeous 2 years ago
It's obvious that "something" doesn't wat such things to be developed and distribuited ...
samoht1977 4 years ago
Yes, the laws of physics.
flowerbower 2 years ago
sure, our "undefiable" and "infinite" physics...
samoht1977 2 years ago
Better than the unproven 'physics' which is invented by conmen in order to 'baffle dupes with science'.
flowerbower 2 years ago
Better than the unproven 'physics' which is invented by conmen in order to 'baffle dupes with science'.
flowerbower 2 years ago