Added: 5 years ago
From: bolinton
Views: 6,613
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • @martinyed They are pseudoscience to real scientists. Pseudoscientists are either incompetent or crooked, and non-scientists are not qualified to judge.

  • @flowerbower this proposal here you think average Americans is pseudoscience? thanks

  • @martinyed I am not sure that I understand your question.

  • the stock is .19 cents... might be a money maker ???  mnga

  • ok, it produces half of the amount of CO2 than gasoline, so it gives as 250 millions cars contaminating the world instead of 500 million......... nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!

  • I'm glad this guy just keeps persisting. His concept is very good and I've been following him for years now.

  • It's obvious that "something" doesn't wat such things to be developed and distribuited ...

  • Yes, the laws of physics.

  • sure, our "undefiable" and "infinite" physics...

  • Better than the unproven 'physics' which is invented by conmen in order to 'baffle dupes with science'.

  • Better than the unproven 'physics' which is invented by conmen in order to 'baffle dupes with science'.

  • Comment removed

  • I'm quoting Prof. Ruggero in a recent email conversation we had:

    "Let us go to the meat: Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics are theories reversible over time because they had to describe time reversal invariant systems such as the atomic structure, particles in an accelerator, etc. for which systems said theories are exactly valid data now part of history. However, it is now also part of history that all energy releasing processes are irreversible over time."

  • "Consequently, relativistic quantum mechanics predicts equal probabilities: one in forward time for two nuclei to fuse into a third, and the second for the time reversal image, the third nucleus that spontaneously decays into the original one in violation of causality, energy conservation and other basic laws. "

  • "Hence, a serious academic environment under a serious ethical control and a serious governmental guidance has indeed the duty of debating how TO SURPASS EINSTEIN AND QUANTUM MECHANICS into irreversible covering theories, but the denial of their need is indeed asocial, anti-American and ascientific, with very dangerous economic downturns visible to everybody and suffered by most, with the prospect of economic and social collapse following the now close petroleum production peak."

  • Are you in fact referring to the crackpot, Santilli, who has teamed up with another academic crackpot (Myron Evans) in an effort to fool those in positions of power (but with zero understanding of science) into thinking that they have discovered perpetual motion?

  • Yes, I am referring to Santilli, and he is no crackpot. Have you even read his work? Perhaps you should do some research before name calling.  The academic world is filled with people like you who value their egos more than actual science. Enjoy feeling superior while you can. You are obsolete.

  • I have been monitoring the antics of 'heterodox' academics for several decades. If it sounds like a crackpot and acts like a crackpot: it's a crackpot! Perhaps you ought to look more carefully at how legitimate science progresses before siding with the loony-tunes. Scientific opinion is swayed only by replicable experimental data. Santilli and his ilk never have any.

  • Actually, to quote Santilli again:

    "To my knowledge, there have been several Ph. D. theses in various countries in mathematics, physics and chemistry based on hadronic mathematics, mechanics and chemistry, respectively, some 19 international meetings resulted in some 60 volumes of proceedings, over 1,000 papers published in virtually all journals (yes including Phys. Rev, J of Physics, Nuovo Cimento, etc.) and some 23 post Ph.D. monographs by various authors in three continents...

  • for over 20,000 pages of published research since my proposal under DOE at Harvard in 1978."

  • The academic world is still slow to get this underway though. However, this technology need not be approved by acadamia to be used by businesses and people around the world. And, thats exactly whats happening.

  • Yes, the volume of pseudoscience-based doctorates, papers, conferences, etc. will soon approach the numbers to be found in the paranormal field. Unfortunately, there is no reproducible experimental evidence for either. Certain theoreticians are rather naive, and will rush to explain 'evidence' without ever asking whether the evidence is genuine.

    And on a practical note, you may be interested to know that Euromagnegas (Santilli's UK company) failed ignominiously.

  • Comment removed

  • Actually, the company is doing well. 'Paranormal' is a really broad description. I wouldn't say it's 'paranormal' at all. Have you read the mathematical papers? I'm looking into them. There are a few pdf files over 200 pages each on this subject. Feel free. Also feel free to specifically document this company's 'shortcomings.' Do you have any specifics to back up your claims?

  • By paranormal, I was referring to the huge literature on telepathy, etc.; all of which has failed to yield a single reproducible experimental proof.

    It is the same problem here: what is the point of ploughing through theory if there is no experimental evidence?

    Euromagnegas is certainly not doing well; it was closed down by the UK's Companies House for, if I recall correctly, failing to file returns.

  • It IS repeatable. Many in the academic world won't give it a chance though. It is being demonstrated without them. Go to the magnegas website and view the companies in India and Israel. I will ask Santilli about the UK companies.

  • Quite: demonstrated to the satisfaction of those who are not capable of performing/evaluating the proper tests.

    Or perhaps we are talking about 2 different things: is this still the magical fuel based upon atomic structures known only to Santilli, or has he now switched to conventional fuel production and is merely trading on his previous notoriety?

  • The research is all there. It just needs further understanding and integration. I'm finished wasting my time with you.

  • ATLANTA, GA -- (Marketwire) -- 10/01/09 -- Market Pulse is pleased to introduce our featured stock, MagneGas Corporation (OTCBB: MNGA), to the investment community! MagneGas Corporation is new to Market Pulse and is poised to become a significant player in the $680 million metal cutting market! MagneGas Corporation just had excellent news out in a press release before today's opening bell announcing that it has grown its footprint within the $680 million metal cutting fuel...

  • ...market through its third distribution agreement, this one with Tennessee-based Holston Gases

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • "If that is not serving the enemies of America,

    what else could it be?"

  • @AscendingAngel777 you are strupid to think the raw food will not cure you. Very strupid, if that's the case.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more