9/11 Resolution Trilogy Volume I: Pattern of the Crimes part 2 of 3

[theoutremerlibrary]

Theattackwas12RAE1i...nohoax

[danielvincentkelley]

Wow great video.

[danielvincentkelley]

Not only does the camera man fix his frame on the target, the fireman is looking all over the place, because it's impossible to tell where the sound is coming from exactly, with the plane obscured behind buildings and it's roar echoing off many flat solid surfaces, the buildings of NY city, yet the camera man knows exactly where the plane is and where it's going.

[willsirotak]

I hope, one day soon, this "theory" will become cumpulsory educational material!

[stophypocrisy]

We can argue over all the details but one thing is certain. It’s the crime of the century! Looks like they might get away with it. No military official has the balls to arrest the criminals outed in "Missing Links” These are the perps but our wimpy military generals shit on their oath to defend the Constitution from forign and domestic enemies even if it means arresting half of DC!

[bizzsnatch]

physics....nose fuselage of the plane hits the pentagon and creates a perfect blast hole thru more than 9 feet of reinforced concrete.

The two 6 ton titanium engines? they didn't leave any holes. how, why? If you can answer that with a coherent scientific answer I will drop the whole....

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!

thing...

[marcpinke]

You can see a) the laser they use to paint the shot in Jennifer Spell's video using an infrared filter and b) if you pay close attention you will see a surveillance drone at exactly 1:15 and you will see and hear it in many other videos from different angles. Very true!

[richiez7]

where is vol. 1 part 3?

[beatlebonzo]

The witness Michael Kelly says the plane that flew low over his car on the bridge was "very small" - does that sound like a 757 series airplane which is considered a "heavy".? Someone from Pilots for 911 truth org needs to join this discussion. Notice in the security camera film, a very small acft seems to skid across the grass. In scale it was less than half of a 757's length - about 150 feet. Other sources have an A-3 mod drone launch fromNavy by Potomac &switch codes w/77

[OperationMockingbird]

It was an A-3 Skywarrior in Flight 77 paint scheme.

[PRIMEx420]

let me kill this airplane engine debate by introducing an overwhelmingly simple fact. it is physically impossible for an airliner to fly at the altitude and speed in the official version of the event at the Pentagon. there's too much lift to get that low, and if you tried (and failed) you would tear the hell out of anything below (like the lawn). kthxbai.

[JZJYRWO]

Our media has been lying to us for a long time to cover government conspiracies. Concrete buildings collapse and there is no rubble, all of the concrete immediately turned to dust. Planes disintegrated at the Pentagon and in Shanksville, PA

If you believe our government's official story, you are an idiot.

Reminds me of the magic bullet theory in 1963

Not hard to believe the New York attack was bullshit. too...

There was no terrorist attack on 9/11

You sent your son to war again for nothing

[josarhus]

It was you who said it came from another engine, so you prove it!

I have clearly shown that it fits the specific Boeing engine, you have showed us nothing! Again let me repeat YOU HAVE SHOWED US NOTHING, YOUR CLAIM FAILED MISRABLY, like everything else, where you are asked to provide solid evidence.

[Thetan1974]

Noone have prooved it came from that 757 specifically.

And noone have prooved it to be exactly an RB211-535. That an internet "expert" compares that photo of a bulged and bend disc, it simply does not proove that it is an RB211-535... from that 75 either.

Seral number, please.

You accept the internet "none-proove". Stupid. Thought that kind of dirty tricks was just for CT-nuts.

[josarhus]

Your are still not answering the question, from what other engine does it come then?! You claimed it to be from another engine but you have NOTHING to back it up. I on the other hand have showed you that it fits the specific engine perfectly.

Stop claiming things that you cant back up, it is so sad to watch!

[Thetan1974]

How should I answer where that disc come from? That's for a REAL investigation to show.

Noone have still PROOVEN, that it came from flight 77. That it came from an RB211 and not something else. That it isn't some kind of other disc similar to it.

Indeed I do have something, which you, according to your nationalist faith, will not accept: that it has NOT been prooven to be 77 that hit the Pent.

[josarhus]

You said it was from another engine! What do you have to support that?! ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. On the other hand the disc has clearly been shown to fit the specific engine perfectly.

And when you look at other debris it also fits perfectly, so why did you claim that it came from another engine?! What do you have to support that?!? Again ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

[OperationMockingbird]

It was an A-3 Skywarrior in Flight 77 paint scheme. If there were 757 engine parts found they were deliberately planted to conform with the ridiculous 757 hitting the Pentagon story.

[josarhus]

What evidence do you have to support that a Skywarrior was even near the Pentagon that day?

[josarhus]

I agree on one thing in this video and that is that fact that a 767 ABSOLUTELY did not hit the Pentagon, it was a 757.

[Thetan1974]

Tried to post answer under "Scientist Niels H. Harrit presents evidence of nano-thermite found in WTC dust on Danish television" - no can do.

You know, i exposed that if there was no inside job, that particular disc would have been proven to come from Flight 77 specifically. Did it have a serial number consistent with parts for 77? Was that disc ever fysically prooven to DO come from a 757 and not just handed over to internet OCT'rs?

Nope.

Enjoy your sinking on the Titanic.