This explains religion, especially Christianity brilliantly, That is it is total bullshit, stick or convert to Atheism, it costs you nothing and it makes sense..
Always wondered about this... Bible doesn't mention dinosaurs at all. And when Cain and Abel got married, who did they get married to? The only people alive at that time were Adam, Eve, Cain, and Abel.
@pratikh There's a bit about giants which has been twisted to mean dinosaurs. But the bible is very open to interpretation, for example when it is translated, different translations offer seperate versions. I think an early Hebrew version doesn't have any mention of 2 of every animal for the ark.
@ Scottzellar - I agree and completely forgot about the cmb! I guess the place I was arguing from was the details on the bang itself. That stands on the framework of the Standard Model, and that model is still waiting on accelerators for final proof.
The proof for evolution is so overwhelming that even creationists are looking to disprove 'macro-evolution', having already accepted 'micro-evolution' as true themselves.
Saying the Big Bang and Evolution are 'equally conclusive' is silly. Evolution has hard experimental evidence and real-time demonstration, whereas the Big bang is a theory back-extrapolated from the observation that the Universe is expanding. Evolution is a fact, the Big Bang is still wide open, but fits most current physical models.
@TheJascal - You're behind on the research. The Big Bang is an absolute fact. There are differences of opinion in the details, but there are many new observations that prove it, the Microwave Background Radiation is perhaps the best proof, but there are others.
@Emprovision I can't decide is that was intentional or because James was the only one willing to get half naked, cover himself in red body paint, and pretend to fuck a cow.
Scientists haven't figured out every single thing, gosh, a few generations after we discovered electricity. By that logic, obviously the entire universe is a unicorn's fart. Try to prove me wrong.
@calladus If I'm so ignorant (by calling me such, you have committed an ad hominem), then please enlighten me. With your wealth of college education, please point me towards a source that says the Big Bang is conclusive as quantifiable fact and I will be fair and not deny your evidence unless I can refer you to a source of my own. And yes, I feel still feel that the scientific community has gotten to the point where Charles Darwin is looked upon as infallable.
@burgers8 The point is he isn't. The problem now is that we live in a world where you have to put a stake down and say your for one side or another without any kind of gray area. Hell, "On the Origin of Species" had just wrong information, Yet some hold it like dogma. If I say that I believe in god, I get atheist's cramming stuff down my ear. Then when I say I also believe in the idea of evolution, I get crazy rednecks saying the world was created 10k years ago:P No middle ground.
@warlockd I see your point and I agree with the "OofS" comment, but I still think that on things such as this, I think its important to know where you stand. I wouldn't say that god and evolution are necessarily mutually exclusive, but there are usually compatibility issues amongst gray areas. Besides, I often see gray areas as simply politically correct areas, and political correctness seems to have diluted culture in an attempt to not offend anybody. Know what you believe.
@burgers8 Jeremy, I thought Canadians were smarter than Americans. Try not to let down the team and leave the delusional thinking where it belongs will ya??? I'm disappointed. Why don't you pass your beliefs through your "Common Sense" processing unit before it's too late. You're being brainwashed. Truly...
@burgers8: I'll tell you true that Darwin wouldn't have recognized Big Bang theory if you'd hit him with it. For a good non-technical source about the Big Bang I would send you to watch?v=mvBFY_FtGfY .
Darwin was certainly not infallible. There is a great deal about evolution that he could not have known (namely, the source of mutation and the mechanism of heritability), and which only became known 90+ years after his book. He said as much in his book; creationists won't let him live it down.
@burgers8 "If I'm so ignorant (by calling me such, you have committed an ad hominem), then please enlighten me. With your wealth of college education, please point me towards a source that says the Big Bang is conclusive..."
OK... ANY University that isn't funded by the Creation Institute. LOL
And how about Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawkings? Not that you'd understand anything they said.
Partial marks by recognizing Ad Hominem though. Keep up the good work, maybe you'll get to high school.
@calladus Evolution to the extent where it responsible for the creation of all living organisms is not a fact. It has gotten to the point where it has become religion. I really wish I had a quick theory to disprove evolutionary theory right now, but alas, I do not wish to engage in the research right now. And no, just because evolution is falsifiable doesn't mean its right. It means it can be shown to be false.
@burgers8 Not a fact. Uh huh. "evolution is a religion". "atheism is a religion". I don't get it, why do religious people always accuse people of committing religion as if it were a terrible thing? I thought religion was supposed to be a good thing?
@calladus "why do religious people always accuse people of committing religion as if it were a terrible thing?"
I agree. Is that the best they can do? Try to pull us down to their level of delusional thinking?
I know religion is dumb and the followers, even dumber but can't they see how laughable this "argument" is?
I'd NEVER consider calling religion a Science... it would be the ultimate insult to Science. But we see Creationists trying to elevate their beliefs to that level all the time.
@TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE "If they say you worship Darwin, brake eye contact & back away slowly!"
LOL. Well maybe but I'm more inclined to laugh in their face.
If you think about it worshiping Darwin makes more sense because:
a) he was a brilliant thinker and
b) he actually EXISTED!
But worship? Nah. I don't worship anyone. I have my own power and I'm not willing to give it up to anyone especially someone who's missed every single meeting he's EVER been invited to. He must use Outlook for his diary.
@burgers8 You and Retard Rage have exactly the same viewpoint. You being a little more polite than him doesn't make you any less wrong. Here is a clue. If you don't understand how someone came to a conclusion, that does not mean the conclusion is wrong. The evidence for the Big Bang is conclusive. The evidence for evolution is conclusive. You might as well start teaching the "Earth Sucks" theory of gravity.
I won't waste my time anymore on your willful and deliberate ignorance.
@burgers8: Your first statement is true: the ToE doesn't explain creation of living things. It explains how living things change over time; another phrase for that is the tree of life concept, the common (living) origin of all living things. The theory about the first creation of life is called abiogenesis, and has little in common with the ToE.
Sure, ToE might be shown false. But you've got to do the work to win the prize. It certainly appears to work from here. If wishes were fishes...
@calladus I will admit that I am a believing monotheistic Christian - not a jesustard as RetardRage liked to put it - and I do agree that my argument looks like a cheater's answer to explain everything. But you must admit that science is an invention of mankind, and therefore, an imperfect system. I do agree intelligent design is not a scientific premise, therefore not a scientifically proven fact. But neither is the big bang theory or the scienitific origins of the universe.
@burgers8: No true scientist would ever say that science is perfect. No theory in science is ever totally proven; at best there is a mountain of evidence in the pro and no serious argument con. However, science is based on the investigation of nature strictly by materialistic, natural means. To the extent that ID admits to a supernatural explanation for anything it is to that extent not science. Behe admitted that astrology would be science if that bound were loosened, as ID proposes.
... So, no, BB and abiogenesis, even evolution and gravitation, are not "proven facts". They are well-evidenced theories, which means they are inductive abstractions of the facts (observations, experimental results). The difference is that they fulfill the requirements of science in being wholly natural explanations of the matters they cover, while ID is not. It is not even a question of examining the evidence; ID simply cannot make it out of the starting gate.
@calladus If science was able to explain everything, then theoretical physicists would have found a unified theory of the universe by now. Science itself is a process that was invented by mankind and it is prone to flaws, especially when it doesn't quantify anything outside the realms of scientific theory.
@burgers8 God of the gaps argument. "Science cannot explain it, therefore God". This is a logical fallacy. Remember, at one time we blamed the gods for thunder and lightning. The problem here is that the gaps keep getting smaller.
@calladus I learned a little bit about falsifiability, and I would agree that the idea of evolution is falsifiable, but just because something is falsifiable by this method, doesn't mean its right. I could mean that it is false.
And I know that you don't "give a flip about my perspective" but science is not know-all and just because something isn't quantifiable by science, doesn't mean it isn't valid.
@burgers8 Evolution is falsifiable. Intelligent design is NOT falsifiable - therefore it is not a scientific premise - in other words, it is a belief.
@burgers8: How often does one have to say it? Science never says it has the answer; it is always possible to force a theory down, by finding a fact that it should cover but does not. When that happens, the theory must be modified or scrapped and re-thought. The proverbial Precambrian bunny would be such a problem for evolution, but Cameron's crocoduck is not. To know why that is true, you have to expend some of that time you are hoarding.
@calludus The only way I believe this is possible is the existence of an intelligent designer. If you have a different definition of macro-evolution, please let me know. As well, I believe that pretty much anything concerning the beginnings of the universe cannot be considered fact, even that which is accepted by the majority of the scientific community.
Perhaps I will check out that MIT course just so I can be more knowledgeable for when I debate this topic in the future.
@burgers8 Genes mutate. Populations change over time. That is evolution. Arbitrarily designating a short time or a long time is really meaningless in the long run.
Abiogenesis is the study of how life arises from inanimate matter. It is a separate subject from evolution. However, if you are interested you might investigate how industry uses self-assembling chemicals and molecules in manufacturing.
The most brilliant part of this video to me is the oft-misused reference to Occam's Razor; Occam's Razor means that of two explanations of equal feasibility, the one that makes the fewest assumptions is the correct one. You can't just say "The devil did it" and say it's Occam's Razor.
@TheShadowhawk7011 I was making a joke. They only painted him from the forehead to the waistline, but while he is moving you can see the unpainted portion of his skin.
Free energy is finaly here!But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
@nateward89 Meh, I go to a Christian school. Assemblies involve prayers and hymns, even though I don't participate. Still, in biology class, evolution is taught as a demonstrable fact, as it should be.
As long as schools keep the religion and education separate, I have no real problems with it.
@horrabletypoe I happened to go to a Christian school as well, and not only was evolution taught as a lie, they integrated Religion in almost every class I attended. Looking back, it was actually pretty terrible. I'm just glad I was able to see through their lies and think for myself. I'm now a practicing Pastafarian.
@holycow818181 Oh yes, elitists that have nothing to add except attempts to enact the voice of reason in the comments are my favorite. Here, have some more ego you pompous fuck.
@MengoMango I'm not angry at you, and I acknowledge that my comment may have been a tad arrogant, but I do think that you and RetardRage99 might be coming across as more rude than you'd like to be.
MengoMango "@RetardRage99 Not really, the only difference between micro and macro evolution is the time span and amount of change. "
I'm rendered fuckin speechless. After I explain the difference 18 fucking times in 18 fucking different ways and in small words someone still types the above.
@RetardRage99 OMFG both of you... wow, the things people get into an argument over on youtube! Have your fucking nerd evolution chat elsewhere dickwads! SOME of us would prefer to just laugh and call this short hilarious!
@RetardRage99 Lol, are you seriously this stupid and/or stubborn? Look up what micro and macro evolution is genius. Stop making up your own bullshit and sticking with it.
"The terms macroevolution and microevolution as used in mainstream science relate to the same processes operating at different scales"
@MengoMango No, stupid, they are DIFFERENT processes. I apologize to Gigavore, but the bare facts are that that Macroevolution takes place and its scientific distinction from the selective mechanism called microevolution deserves to be defended from idiots like MengoMango
@RetardRage99 Wow, nevermind, you are just a troll. "The bare facts are" LOL. You've backed up your points with nothing except inane phrases like "The bare facts are...". Here's a simple task that even a retard such as yourself may be able to handle: look it up on wikipedia and go to hell thanks.
@MengoMango you just cited wikipedia as an authoritative source and ignored everything else i said. i don't think it's possible to fail harder without actually being dick cheney
@RetardRage99 The wikipedia entry has five different references to back it up. The only thing you have is ignorance of a fact that is common knowledge gained from any kind of high school biology course.
But that would require an education though which you clearly do not demonstrate. Sorry, that's just the difficult truth about the mentally handicapped.
I'm having loads of fun now that the idiot i was arguing with tucked tail and shut his yap, because these videos are great and his stupidity detracted from them.
Wow... people are idiots.... arguing over religion and science on a video that has to do with COMEDY??? I'm a Christian, but I'm not an idiot enough to do this.
I like your closing with The Cancer line, I usually open with with Religion Retarding the Advancement of Scientific Research Just like it did in Medieval Islam - The Islamic Golden Age (7501258 C.E.) when Islam Began its fight Agains Science.
1:30
MvPyroScope 1 week ago
ugh..buthurt bible literlaists believing in hocus-pocus
finka123456 2 weeks ago
I love you the way Satan loves hippos.
ninebritishships 1 month ago
press here 1:29 for jesus jerking motion
cacho707 2 months ago
Don't teach music!!!! It's just a THEORY!
Enginmaster 3 months ago
Hold down 6.
Be amazed and aroused.
MenachemSchmuel 3 months ago
This explains religion, especially Christianity brilliantly, That is it is total bullshit, stick or convert to Atheism, it costs you nothing and it makes sense..
timdnwd 4 months ago 7
@timdnwd
Evolution has nothing to do with religion or Atheism.
Globally, most evolutionists are Christian and most Christians are evolutionists.
Creationism is the problem. Bullshit posing as science is a problem.
People trying to bring unproven crap into and push established scientific facts out of public schools/politics is a problem.
However I do accept and understand that many people draw a connection between atheism and scientific theories such as evolution.
CallMeMrNameless 3 weeks ago 3
@CallMeMrNameless
"Globally, most evolutionists are Christian and most Christians are evolutionists."
Source?
headcheeez 1 week ago
@headcheeez
/watch?v=KnJX68ELbAY
At 6:41
CallMeMrNameless 1 week ago
I wonder who's job it is to paint a naked James every time they do one of these sketches.
nohurtme 5 months ago 7
@nohurtme And, more importantly: are they willing to take on an understudy?
MagFlare 2 months ago
BJ university? I want to go there!
ZackVixACD 6 months ago 5
Only 20 years?
MegaZeusThor 6 months ago
zach is remarkably reminiscent of jesus :O
aviza12 6 months ago 4
This strikes me as being remarkably similar to the theories of the Church of the flying spaghetti monster!
someguycalleddave 7 months ago
Always wondered about this... Bible doesn't mention dinosaurs at all. And when Cain and Abel got married, who did they get married to? The only people alive at that time were Adam, Eve, Cain, and Abel.
pratikh 7 months ago
@pratikh There's a bit about giants which has been twisted to mean dinosaurs. But the bible is very open to interpretation, for example when it is translated, different translations offer seperate versions. I think an early Hebrew version doesn't have any mention of 2 of every animal for the ark.
valdrec 4 months ago
@pratikh I thought Eve had more children. So, their sisters, I guess.
INTPTT 4 months ago
@INTPTT Hawt.
pratikh 4 months ago
I fail to see why both sides of the argument seem to take everything literally. Go read some Campbell and lets see where we are.
shuttledik 7 months ago
That is the funniest devil I have seen since the one on COW&CHICKEN
doobiesmoke15 7 months ago 4
This is what Creationists actually believe.
GBart 7 months ago 26
I think it would be better if it ended at 0:27
agreenjinjo 7 months ago
Jesus doing the jerk-off motion is possibly the greatest thing the inter-highway has to offer.
mrdaym 8 months ago 96
I didn't know Satan had 8 breasts D:
7410n0 9 months ago
Maybe I'm weird, but I find that chick to be really hot.
Armonis 9 months ago 4
@Armonis Zack wont share her with me :(
DuckReconMajor 8 months ago
@Armonis You're not alone.
pratikh 4 months ago
Hahaahahah, oh my God, I just noticed James' unpainted crack at 0:10 for the first time. That makes this video ten times more hilarious.
Twerty222 9 months ago 6
Crocoduck at 0:50 <3
MardukMayhem 9 months ago
haha, a crocoduck! WE'VE FINALLY FOUND ONE!
discopete117 10 months ago 8
Hold down six, for laughs. :V
armegeddis 11 months ago
0:12
Over and over and over again.
Bealocwealm 11 months ago
crocoduck mothafucka!
mollutje 11 months ago
The Dare Island Enigma is a novel concerning an alternative view of evolution see video book trailer
dltanner99 11 months ago
This has probably already been asked on here before, but what is the music/song playing in the background?
ibeholder12 1 year ago
i swear i thought that was happycabbie at first
SyCoeSis 1 year ago
0:11 to 0:13 what is he tea baging
lochlandb 1 year ago
@ Scottzellar - I agree and completely forgot about the cmb! I guess the place I was arguing from was the details on the bang itself. That stands on the framework of the Standard Model, and that model is still waiting on accelerators for final proof.
The proof for evolution is so overwhelming that even creationists are looking to disprove 'macro-evolution', having already accepted 'micro-evolution' as true themselves.
TheJascal 1 year ago
Saying the Big Bang and Evolution are 'equally conclusive' is silly. Evolution has hard experimental evidence and real-time demonstration, whereas the Big bang is a theory back-extrapolated from the observation that the Universe is expanding. Evolution is a fact, the Big Bang is still wide open, but fits most current physical models.
TheJascal 1 year ago
@TheJascal - You're behind on the research. The Big Bang is an absolute fact. There are differences of opinion in the details, but there are many new observations that prove it, the Microwave Background Radiation is perhaps the best proof, but there are others.
scottzellar 1 year ago
@TheJascal
Evolution shouldn't really be a theory, it's basically long term adaption and it's already been proven.
DevinTClark 1 year ago
@DevinTClark
No such thing as a scientific fact. Just good theories that must be built upon.
ff7masta 1 year ago
@ff7masta
Wouldn't there being no such thing as a scientific fact be a scientific fact?
DevinTClark 1 year ago 2
@ff7masta ~ True, but you sound like an idiot when you say that.
Picture someone saying, "You can't PROVE the theory of gravitational law!"
I don't know about you, but my response would be to kick him in the nuts.
"How about that... you didn't float away!"
CR4TES 1 year ago
Comment removed
ff7masta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CR4TES
Yeah regular people might think you are being semantical, but a scientist recognises the difference between law, theory, facts and hypotheses.
ff7masta 1 year ago
@CR4TES "THEORY of gravitational LAW"? Are you retarded?
andynator1000 11 months ago 4
@CR4TES I want you to be my Ph.D Supervisor plz.
hyperdude144 8 months ago
Religion is belife, evolution is fact... Isn't the answer obvoius?
TheReaper906 1 year ago
@TheReaper906 ...and spelling is a suggestion.
jfuex 1 year ago
I love how the college professor and Satan are the same guy. :P
Emprovision 1 year ago 144
@Emprovision That's because the professor is Satan in disguise.
xilibai 10 months ago
@Emprovision I can't decide is that was intentional or because James was the only one willing to get half naked, cover himself in red body paint, and pretend to fuck a cow.
TheMinxTail 8 months ago 6
lol
yo1o2eggs 1 year ago
My T-shirt arrived!!!
"Too stupid to understand Science? Try Religion."
Heh.
RockyRacoon18 1 year ago
Scientists haven't figured out every single thing, gosh, a few generations after we discovered electricity. By that logic, obviously the entire universe is a unicorn's fart. Try to prove me wrong.
tannedNgreen 1 year ago
What's that comic in the back?
The end gag was the best, though a red-painted fat man's pretty funny.
Seriously though, what repeatable lab experiment are you aware of demonstrating evolution?
Kogerii 1 year ago
@Kogerii who asked: "what repeatable lab experiment are you aware of demonstrating evolution?"
All I can do is laugh and suggest you open a modern genetics book.
TheJascal 1 year ago 4
@calladus If I'm so ignorant (by calling me such, you have committed an ad hominem), then please enlighten me. With your wealth of college education, please point me towards a source that says the Big Bang is conclusive as quantifiable fact and I will be fair and not deny your evidence unless I can refer you to a source of my own. And yes, I feel still feel that the scientific community has gotten to the point where Charles Darwin is looked upon as infallable.
burgers8 1 year ago
@burgers8 The point is he isn't. The problem now is that we live in a world where you have to put a stake down and say your for one side or another without any kind of gray area. Hell, "On the Origin of Species" had just wrong information, Yet some hold it like dogma. If I say that I believe in god, I get atheist's cramming stuff down my ear. Then when I say I also believe in the idea of evolution, I get crazy rednecks saying the world was created 10k years ago:P No middle ground.
warlockd 1 year ago
@warlockd I see your point and I agree with the "OofS" comment, but I still think that on things such as this, I think its important to know where you stand. I wouldn't say that god and evolution are necessarily mutually exclusive, but there are usually compatibility issues amongst gray areas. Besides, I often see gray areas as simply politically correct areas, and political correctness seems to have diluted culture in an attempt to not offend anybody. Know what you believe.
burgers8 1 year ago
@burgers8 Jeremy, I thought Canadians were smarter than Americans. Try not to let down the team and leave the delusional thinking where it belongs will ya??? I'm disappointed. Why don't you pass your beliefs through your "Common Sense" processing unit before it's too late. You're being brainwashed. Truly...
RockyRacoon18 1 year ago
@burgers8: I'll tell you true that Darwin wouldn't have recognized Big Bang theory if you'd hit him with it. For a good non-technical source about the Big Bang I would send you to watch?v=mvBFY_FtGfY .
Darwin was certainly not infallible. There is a great deal about evolution that he could not have known (namely, the source of mutation and the mechanism of heritability), and which only became known 90+ years after his book. He said as much in his book; creationists won't let him live it down.
puncheex 1 year ago
@burgers8 "If I'm so ignorant (by calling me such, you have committed an ad hominem), then please enlighten me. With your wealth of college education, please point me towards a source that says the Big Bang is conclusive..."
OK... ANY University that isn't funded by the Creation Institute. LOL
And how about Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawkings? Not that you'd understand anything they said.
Partial marks by recognizing Ad Hominem though. Keep up the good work, maybe you'll get to high school.
RockyRacoon18 1 year ago
@calladus Evolution to the extent where it responsible for the creation of all living organisms is not a fact. It has gotten to the point where it has become religion. I really wish I had a quick theory to disprove evolutionary theory right now, but alas, I do not wish to engage in the research right now. And no, just because evolution is falsifiable doesn't mean its right. It means it can be shown to be false.
burgers8 1 year ago
@burgers8 Not a fact. Uh huh. "evolution is a religion". "atheism is a religion". I don't get it, why do religious people always accuse people of committing religion as if it were a terrible thing? I thought religion was supposed to be a good thing?
calladus 1 year ago 3
@calladus "why do religious people always accuse people of committing religion as if it were a terrible thing?"
I agree. Is that the best they can do? Try to pull us down to their level of delusional thinking?
I know religion is dumb and the followers, even dumber but can't they see how laughable this "argument" is?
I'd NEVER consider calling religion a Science... it would be the ultimate insult to Science. But we see Creationists trying to elevate their beliefs to that level all the time.
RockyRacoon18 1 year ago 2
@RockyRacoon18 Religion is the dogmatic belief in a deity.
If they say you worship Darwin, brake eye contact & back away slowly!
TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE 1 year ago 2
@TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE "If they say you worship Darwin, brake eye contact & back away slowly!"
LOL. Well maybe but I'm more inclined to laugh in their face.
If you think about it worshiping Darwin makes more sense because:
a) he was a brilliant thinker and
b) he actually EXISTED!
But worship? Nah. I don't worship anyone. I have my own power and I'm not willing to give it up to anyone especially someone who's missed every single meeting he's EVER been invited to. He must use Outlook for his diary.
RockyRacoon18 1 year ago 5
@RockyRacoon18 Brovo, my dear boy, brovo!
TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE 1 year ago
@burgers8 You and Retard Rage have exactly the same viewpoint. You being a little more polite than him doesn't make you any less wrong. Here is a clue. If you don't understand how someone came to a conclusion, that does not mean the conclusion is wrong. The evidence for the Big Bang is conclusive. The evidence for evolution is conclusive. You might as well start teaching the "Earth Sucks" theory of gravity.
I won't waste my time anymore on your willful and deliberate ignorance.
calladus 1 year ago
@burgers8 "Evolution to the extent where it responsible for the creation of all living organisms is not a fact"
Uhh did you drop out of high school? Evolution says NOTHING about the creation of life.
"but alas, I do not wish to engage in the research right now."
Translation: "I'm too lazy to put in the work to learn the facts."
" It means it can be shown to be false."
Well go ahead. The entire world of Scientists and Creationists have ALL being trying to falsify it for 150 years. Duh!!
RockyRacoon18 1 year ago
@burgers8: Your first statement is true: the ToE doesn't explain creation of living things. It explains how living things change over time; another phrase for that is the tree of life concept, the common (living) origin of all living things. The theory about the first creation of life is called abiogenesis, and has little in common with the ToE.
Sure, ToE might be shown false. But you've got to do the work to win the prize. It certainly appears to work from here. If wishes were fishes...
puncheex 1 year ago 2
@calladus I will admit that I am a believing monotheistic Christian - not a jesustard as RetardRage liked to put it - and I do agree that my argument looks like a cheater's answer to explain everything. But you must admit that science is an invention of mankind, and therefore, an imperfect system. I do agree intelligent design is not a scientific premise, therefore not a scientifically proven fact. But neither is the big bang theory or the scienitific origins of the universe.
burgers8 1 year ago
@burgers8: No true scientist would ever say that science is perfect. No theory in science is ever totally proven; at best there is a mountain of evidence in the pro and no serious argument con. However, science is based on the investigation of nature strictly by materialistic, natural means. To the extent that ID admits to a supernatural explanation for anything it is to that extent not science. Behe admitted that astrology would be science if that bound were loosened, as ID proposes.
puncheex 1 year ago 3
... So, no, BB and abiogenesis, even evolution and gravitation, are not "proven facts". They are well-evidenced theories, which means they are inductive abstractions of the facts (observations, experimental results). The difference is that they fulfill the requirements of science in being wholly natural explanations of the matters they cover, while ID is not. It is not even a question of examining the evidence; ID simply cannot make it out of the starting gate.
puncheex 1 year ago 3
@calladus If science was able to explain everything, then theoretical physicists would have found a unified theory of the universe by now. Science itself is a process that was invented by mankind and it is prone to flaws, especially when it doesn't quantify anything outside the realms of scientific theory.
burgers8 1 year ago
@burgers8 God of the gaps argument. "Science cannot explain it, therefore God". This is a logical fallacy. Remember, at one time we blamed the gods for thunder and lightning. The problem here is that the gaps keep getting smaller.
calladus 1 year ago
@calladus I learned a little bit about falsifiability, and I would agree that the idea of evolution is falsifiable, but just because something is falsifiable by this method, doesn't mean its right. I could mean that it is false.
And I know that you don't "give a flip about my perspective" but science is not know-all and just because something isn't quantifiable by science, doesn't mean it isn't valid.
burgers8 1 year ago
@burgers8 Evolution is falsifiable. Intelligent design is NOT falsifiable - therefore it is not a scientific premise - in other words, it is a belief.
calladus 1 year ago
@burgers8: How often does one have to say it? Science never says it has the answer; it is always possible to force a theory down, by finding a fact that it should cover but does not. When that happens, the theory must be modified or scrapped and re-thought. The proverbial Precambrian bunny would be such a problem for evolution, but Cameron's crocoduck is not. To know why that is true, you have to expend some of that time you are hoarding.
puncheex 1 year ago 5
@calludus The only way I believe this is possible is the existence of an intelligent designer. If you have a different definition of macro-evolution, please let me know. As well, I believe that pretty much anything concerning the beginnings of the universe cannot be considered fact, even that which is accepted by the majority of the scientific community.
Perhaps I will check out that MIT course just so I can be more knowledgeable for when I debate this topic in the future.
burgers8 1 year ago
@burgers8 Genes mutate. Populations change over time. That is evolution. Arbitrarily designating a short time or a long time is really meaningless in the long run.
Abiogenesis is the study of how life arises from inanimate matter. It is a separate subject from evolution. However, if you are interested you might investigate how industry uses self-assembling chemicals and molecules in manufacturing.
calladus 1 year ago
The most brilliant part of this video to me is the oft-misused reference to Occam's Razor; Occam's Razor means that of two explanations of equal feasibility, the one that makes the fewest assumptions is the correct one. You can't just say "The devil did it" and say it's Occam's Razor.
metallicakixtotalass 1 year ago 2
That's not Satan! I can clearly see that his ass is white!
FOXGEAR92 1 year ago
@FOXGEAR92 Wait, so if its not white, what is it, because clearly you've seen it.
TheShadowhawk7011 1 year ago
@TheShadowhawk7011 I was making a joke. They only painted him from the forehead to the waistline, but while he is moving you can see the unpainted portion of his skin.
FOXGEAR92 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy is finaly here!But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get the blueprints for a real Magnet motor free enegy machine at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
affluenceclm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@calladus Hey, these ARE Americans we're talking about. ;)
AdeptOmega 1 year ago
What's the music they use?
davidnvn 1 year ago
Hey, does anyone know what song they're playing?
gogol45 1 year ago
0:09 looks like Zoidberg.
MrMendicant 1 year ago
hahahaha
TheAnonnation 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
seriously?? Am I the only one who finds this offensive?
Smilingiskool 1 year ago
@Smilingiskool Possibly. For me it's LOL though.
sandorski55 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's sad to think that you don't know Jesus Christ and so you are, therefor, saying making fun of the truth is funny.
Smilingiskool 1 year ago
I love Hawk & Dove! But why are they in the background?
MisterSynyster 1 year ago
HEY! Mango & Rage! Stop it. Just stop it. Take that tomfoolery discussion someplace else
MisterSynyster 1 year ago
Boo cancer research, boo overpopulation.
Valcien 1 year ago
Satan is a dick, touch him on the penis
ShinyRust 1 year ago
Smbc. Damn iPhone
trunks1102 1 year ago
Zach as Jesus. Awesome. Never thought in high school he'd be Jesus... His sister maybe... Love SMBV
trunks1102 1 year ago
What song are they playing?
TheReaper906 1 year ago
LOL!!!
Bulliedozer2 1 year ago
I love the cross species explanation D:
Aeolius4 1 year ago
wow ... smoke screen ...
Jackjack505 1 year ago
At 1:05 he looks like a fat stubbled and balding version of Mr. Bennet from Heroes.
Hot.
Efreeti 1 year ago
Set cancer research back by twenty years, touch him on the penis
salaamAW 1 year ago
what song from 0:00 too 0:28??
TheReaper906 1 year ago
is that gatchaman
MonsterKingRen 1 year ago
okay am I just weird or is Jesus/Weiner the sexyst blaspheme ever?
sheprime004 1 year ago 2
Wheee. Massive drama between 'MengoMengo' and 'RetardRage99' over yet another culture-war issue. You go, Youtube comments.
ooogooman 1 year ago
"Okay, I'll sign, but only if I don't have to sit through Glenn Beck's commencement address."
omgitsmikegravel 1 year ago
and this shit is why no one should go to a christian school
nateward89 1 year ago
@nateward89 Meh, I go to a Christian school. Assemblies involve prayers and hymns, even though I don't participate. Still, in biology class, evolution is taught as a demonstrable fact, as it should be.
As long as schools keep the religion and education separate, I have no real problems with it.
horrabletypoe 1 year ago 109
@horrabletypoe Even religion textbooks now have a page or two on evolution, explaining that the Bible is to be interpreted, not believed wholesale.
Then again, I live in Canada.
xscoot 8 months ago 4
@horrabletypoe I happened to go to a Christian school as well, and not only was evolution taught as a lie, they integrated Religion in almost every class I attended. Looking back, it was actually pretty terrible. I'm just glad I was able to see through their lies and think for myself. I'm now a practicing Pastafarian.
Rephistorch 7 months ago 9
@Rephistorch Ramen brother. Where was that school of yours?
Twinroads 7 months ago
Best one ever!!!
bsleffel 1 year ago
Oh, the beauty of free scientific inquiry.
Seriously, you guys are acting like... well, YouTube commenters.
holycow818181 1 year ago
@holycow818181 Oh yes, elitists that have nothing to add except attempts to enact the voice of reason in the comments are my favorite. Here, have some more ego you pompous fuck.
MengoMango 1 year ago
@MengoMango I'm not angry at you, and I acknowledge that my comment may have been a tad arrogant, but I do think that you and RetardRage99 might be coming across as more rude than you'd like to be.
holycow818181 1 year ago
My Fav
TheReaper906 1 year ago
the last 5 seconds were among the funniest things I have ever seen on the internet, and I live on the internet.
LopezzT 1 year ago
0:42 epic
wizard13335 1 year ago
loves how the devil and the proffessor are played by the same guy (i think...)
Gigavore 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Charles Dickwin.
Convince him evolution is a lie, touch him on the penis.
MPS186282 1 year ago
MengoMango "@RetardRage99 Not really, the only difference between micro and macro evolution is the time span and amount of change. "
I'm rendered fuckin speechless. After I explain the difference 18 fucking times in 18 fucking different ways and in small words someone still types the above.
RetardRage99 1 year ago
@RetardRage99 OMFG both of you... wow, the things people get into an argument over on youtube! Have your fucking nerd evolution chat elsewhere dickwads! SOME of us would prefer to just laugh and call this short hilarious!
Gigavore 1 year ago
@Gigavore ok you have a point. i'll stfu about it, lol
RetardRage99 1 year ago
@RetardRage99 Lol, are you seriously this stupid and/or stubborn? Look up what micro and macro evolution is genius. Stop making up your own bullshit and sticking with it.
"The terms macroevolution and microevolution as used in mainstream science relate to the same processes operating at different scales"
There you go dumbass.
MengoMango 1 year ago
@MengoMango No, stupid, they are DIFFERENT processes. I apologize to Gigavore, but the bare facts are that that Macroevolution takes place and its scientific distinction from the selective mechanism called microevolution deserves to be defended from idiots like MengoMango
RetardRage99 1 year ago
@RetardRage99 Wow, nevermind, you are just a troll. "The bare facts are" LOL. You've backed up your points with nothing except inane phrases like "The bare facts are...". Here's a simple task that even a retard such as yourself may be able to handle: look it up on wikipedia and go to hell thanks.
MengoMango 1 year ago
@MengoMango you just cited wikipedia as an authoritative source and ignored everything else i said. i don't think it's possible to fail harder without actually being dick cheney
RetardRage99 1 year ago
@RetardRage99 Then give me another reference. You've proven absolutely nothing so far.
MengoMango 1 year ago
@RetardRage99 The wikipedia entry has five different references to back it up. The only thing you have is ignorance of a fact that is common knowledge gained from any kind of high school biology course.
But that would require an education though which you clearly do not demonstrate. Sorry, that's just the difficult truth about the mentally handicapped.
MengoMango 1 year ago
I love how everyone else is having fun here, except the two retards arguing.
Sumieification 1 year ago 2
@Sumieification
I'm having loads of fun now that the idiot i was arguing with tucked tail and shut his yap, because these videos are great and his stupidity detracted from them.
RetardRage99 1 year ago
James Ashby in bodypaint, touch him on the penis.
Rhademanthus 1 year ago 2
What's the catchy music?
grantorndorff 1 year ago
Wow... people are idiots.... arguing over religion and science on a video that has to do with COMEDY??? I'm a Christian, but I'm not an idiot enough to do this.
13Yeared 1 year ago 7
Now if only Satan will do that radiometric dating thing on all our nuclear waste.
DKshad0w 1 year ago
The ending is the GREATEST shot in history XXXXD
metallicakixtotalass 1 year ago 3
I love the opening. "These must be a million years old!" "YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSS!!!"
lessurrheak 1 year ago 6
Best. Music. Ever.
paledragon64 1 year ago 5
LMFAO
MiddyAlmighty 2 years ago
BJ university has an awesome football team XD
Leadman1989 2 years ago 4
1:31
Over and over and over again.
Breadcleaner 2 years ago 5
YOU ARE THE DEVIL.
If the Devil Means Awesome,
I like your closing with The Cancer line, I usually open with with Religion Retarding the Advancement of Scientific Research Just like it did in Medieval Islam - The Islamic Golden Age (7501258 C.E.) when Islam Began its fight Agains Science.
M1ST3RHYDE 2 years ago
the radiometric dating one is so hilarious
TwitchyTurnip 2 years ago 4
I've seen this more than 10 times now and it's still fucking funny.
philipjayfry 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
This sucks
heyimthatperson 2 years ago
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
thesxex 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You suck And we all know what you suck.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
Develop a theory, touch him on the penis
AdrianvsJak 2 years ago 6
Holy shit almost 100,000 views! thats so awesome, cool job guys.
paulduddy91 2 years ago
LMAO. Awesome!
Bear5177 2 years ago
I have to admit, Jesus making the jerk-off motion is one of the funniest blasphemies I've ever seen.
ContentAnimeFan 2 years ago 107
1:31 is priceless.
trentwearsfape 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Get your degree, touch him on the penis.
Ssalamanderr 2 years ago 26
Rofl! This only makes sense to Christians.
crazierthanever69 2 years ago 5
Ha ha ha ha!!!!!
kuntgames616 2 years ago
verginz
gnarleypunkroker5 2 years ago
Wanker Jesus ftw. Satan makes the best faces. I like the happy bouncing he did when he hid behind the lot.
ChelseeK 2 years ago 4
What is the background music?
Crusader1089 2 years ago
@Crusader1089:
It's called Sideman Strut, by musicallewis. You can find it in the Audio Portal on Newgrounds.
vaderwalks 2 years ago
The music and Zach's face at the end make this my favorite SMBCT yet
BocoROTH 2 years ago
I love the music in the background, it's so perfect
waddleman 2 years ago 3
love the punchline
RobotTickleFight 2 years ago
I had no idea UC Davis was also Baby Jesus University.
rickrussell 2 years ago 4
Baby Jesus University, I would cry if that were a real university lol
Kiensai 2 years ago 6
well, there is Bob Jones university, similar enough to that.
sarcasmagasm 2 years ago 2
i love the music, its amezing how its match the silliness of the theory jajajajajja keep the good work.
thetallman 2 years ago