Creationism = FAIL

[Mzungu64]

Creationists are pretty stupid!

[preetor1]

01:18 Rays ass on fire.

[LittleBabyBum]

Bill Hicks summed it up nicely: “You ever noticed how people who believe in Creationism look really unevolved? You ever noticed that? Eyes real close together, eyebrow ridges, big furry hands and feet.

[Bill mimics a creationist] "I believe God created me in one day"

Yeah, looks like He rushed it.”

[nancy6ify]

primates evolved from mammals, our earliest common ancestor was a primate. From this ancestor very early branches of primates split off, one of which led to our earlier human ancestors, others which led to chimps, gorillas, baboons, and other primates. Some primates, such as chimpazees, are higher primates than, say, monkeys. Man is the ultimate highest primate. I think its pretty close to that, correct me if I'm wrong.

[KamasutraButterfly]

Anyone else find it ironic that Ken Ham looks a little like Dr. Zaius from the original "Planet of the Apes"? XD

[Zontertes]

I just pissed my pants! hahahahahaha

[omgalation]

the guys face at 0:36 is priceless :D

[MrWagman11]

It looks like God made Ken Ham with a beer gut.

[Ryagful]

when the VATICAN says to a creationist that they fail....

[NessVlogMusic]

Are you god?

No.

PWWWWND!!

..Not. lol

[battlemeok]

"to teach people how to think" there you have it my friends.... religion is simply a tool to make the sheep follow the Shepard.

[wearestarstuffsagan]

why aint the video working? only my computer?

[Audrachu]

So this is what creationists do with all the money the ask for..

[TheCaptainLulz]

1:17 - LAWL - liar liar pants on fire!

[palmerpoop]

Wow.. Just, just wow.

[ApathicAgnostic]

Well, that shows that you can't argue with creationists, because they are blinded as hell (haha ...) and don't accept scientific facts. There's nothing you can do for them, except giving them enlightment like Paul the Alien does. :D

[MrMZaccone]

"Teach them how to think"??? What you people teach is how NOT to think, in fact how to avoid thinking at all cost.

[drfitnessnow]

not only does Ken Ham sound like a drunk..he's got the beer belly to prove it!

[yeudh]

Here we have Ken Ham the man on the cutting edge of creation science. We learn that he is a carnival barker that only relies on a bronze age book for is information. If this is the best that creationist can do, I am embarrassed for any one that gullible and stupid.

[drini1991]

are you god? hahaha

[Crankep]

Wow, the priest was fucking epic.

[HonestMan395]

Ken Ham has missed his calling. He would have made a great standup comedian.

You have to admit that creationists are very funny.

[NormanAngle]

So he believes God just kills off species?

[MrAwesomesauce101]

they wasted are hard earn money on something that may not exist.....classic.

[spyrocrap10]

museum = SO FUCKING WRONG!!!

THIS MUSEUM IS A FUCKING ABOMINATION!!!

WHY, WHY, OH WHY DOES THIS MUSEUM EVEN EXIST?

WORDS CANNOT DESCRIBE THE INTENSE AMOUNT OF BULLSHIT THIS MUSEUM HOLDS INSIDE!!!

UN

FUCKING

BELIEVABLE!!!

[bringonthewrath]

It's like Jurassic Park but for real!!!! LOL

[faustolg]

Unreal Tournament version:

Creationism = Mo mo mo mo mo MONSTER FAIL, Fail fail!!!

[Cammers2991]

Priest= Epic Win

Museum Guy= Epic Fail

Thats all there is to it.

Oh, and that guys smug face at 4:33, I couldn't stop laughing.

[i6o4]

LOL, they have people hanging with Dinosaurs. But, the fact is, why is there no mention of the fucking DINOSAURS in the BIBLE? Not one! Sounds a bit fishy to me.

[ProfoundReality2]

... fish, reptile, mammal, ape, human, creationist, back to ape...

[azzy314159]

America = Nuts

[SamonMarquis]

I would like to cyro-genetically freeze people similar to Ken Ham, and re-awaken them in 200 years. The future will not take him seriously, so why should we?

[homunculus89]

0:17 epic fail

0:36 fail by inability

0:50 wtf?

0:50-4:35 ...many futher fails

[viletree]

Instead of burning mosques, someone should torch that "museum" of bullshit

[myteethareshiny]

"If you're saying this part over here that says God made land animals and man on the same day isn't true, then ultimately, why should I believe this bit over here?"

I find it hilarious that this came out of the mouth of a Creationist. I agree with this sentence 100%. That's why I don't trust a word of the Bible.

[purbrookian]

To understand why creationism is atavistic tripe, you need to be analytical , cerebral, and intellectually honest. . The Ham has all but three of those characteristics.

[solidus353]

i'm sure this is obvious and all, but...when he says "well, then a woman would've had to have come from an ape woman", I get the feeling that he thinks that a gorilla just one day magically gave birth to a fully grown human woman.

[CreativeVisionary92]

Vatican astronomer is... something like: gay republican .... LOLOLOLOL!!!! :D

[IrisTrinity]

I sure am enjoying this combination white-trash beer belly/Amish beard situation he has going on.

[alfapint]

Nice moneyspinner that museum. Sweet FA to do with religion, though. These guys are no better than snake oil salesmen.

[Dyllon11]

I hate that people still think we came from apes. We didn't, the apes and us had a common ancestor and evolved separately to suit environment.

[supersmash43]

@Dyllon11 creationism=big ass fail! They make my day with their fail!

[mastaODI56]

@supersmash43 me to



[SRYDB3RG]

@Dyllon11 Exactly.

[blazereef]

@Dyllon11 actually, our ancestors would have been classified as "ape" and we are still "ape" so yes, we did evolve from apes, the problem is when they think that we evolved from ape species that live today

[Dyllon11]

@blazereef yes I recently found this out but forgot about this comment thanks for the correction.

[PJDesseyn]

@Dyllon11: well...we DID come from apes...in fact, we ARE apes...there's absolutely nothing which makes us non-apes. What you probably mean to say, is that humans and OTHER apes (chimpanzees, gorillas, etc) have a common ancestor and evolved separately. But we're still 100% apes and thus evolved from earlier apes. Likewise, we're still monkeys, mammals, tetrapods, vertebrates, eukaryotes, etc.

[mrdeathly]

@Dyllon11

Well, we are still apes. We and other ape species have a common ancestor and we evolved separately, but we are all still members of the great apes.

[ComAntNeLib]

@mrdeathly primates i think is what you mean

[mrdeathly]

@ComAntNeLib We are primates. We are ALSO apes.

[ComAntNeLib]

@mrdeathly ye but the name is primates right?

[mrdeathly]

@ComAntNeLib The name is Hominidae. Humans belong to this and the common name is "great ape." Hominidae is subset of the order of Primates which include several other Families in the scientific classification. 

[ComAntNeLib]

@mrdeathly cool thx for telling me that =)

[mrdeathly]

@ComAntNeLib Not a problem. :]

[alex39977]

@Dyllon11 you might as well call it an ape since we are primates.

[trueleroix]

@Dyllon11 The way I see it, at the points where all five of the great apes diverged from the others, in whatever order, if you go back to the first divergence, that species probably was an ape. Not just an ape, but a great ape even. I don't see what is so hate worthy about that.

[lilsm555]

@Dyllon11 We are apes look up the definition lol apes are any biological member of the Hominoidea super family.

[MrSpleesh]

@Dyllon11 And what was our common ancestor? It would most likley be considered an ape, atleast they're called "great apes", hominidae, and their characteristics suit that of an ape better then human. Yes, monkeys today are not our previous ancestor but you're still an ape, you can not evolve out of your heritage. It simply doesn't work like that. You can only change over milennia, where small changes accumulate into something different. We didn't come from ->monkeys<- would be more correct.

[MrSpleesh]

@Dyllon11 Secondly, you can not evolve to suit your enviroment, that would be more along the lines of Lamarckism. The organisms which do not survive die out, leaving their genome extinct assuming they do not propagate and the organisms which do survive are better adapted to survive then the ones who died out. Their survival is what determines suitability to enviroments. Those who do change favourably to the enviroment do get a larger chance of surviving tho, but this takes time aswell.

[Sanquinity]

@Dyllon11 You mean from monkey's. "Ape" is the encompassing term for all primate species. Which is us too. We're a species of ape. So we did come from apes, and technically are still apes. But we are not monkey's. We're not directly related to any of the apes we see in the zoo for instance.

[lilsm555]

@Dyllon11 We are apes you moron we are apart of the primate family.

[maccaaccam99]

@Dyllon11 that common ancestor is an ape. a prehistoric great ape. so yes we did evolve from apes. but not from the apes we see today. bit late to reply but meh

[Dyllon11]

@Dyllon11 Alright people I realise I have made a slight mistake in this comment, there is no need for 10 more replies with varying levels of politeness.

[Ackers555]

@Dyllon11 Sorry but we're in the Genus Hominini, which includes chimps and bononbos. This means humans chimps and bonobos had a common ancestor. Since that ancestor is higher up the family tree than the branches for gorillas, Orang-utans and gibbons, that common ancestor must be an ape. Your statement went out of date when human and ape genomes were mapped.

[wearestarstuffsagan]

@Dyllon11 actually, we did come from apes since we are apes and our parents are apes, the problem is that people think we came from currently alive apes like chimps

[wearestarstuffsagan]

@Dyllon11 actually, our ancestors would have been apes so we did evolve from apes, the misunderstanding is that they think we say we evolved from apes today, like chimps

[Helge129]

@Dyllon11 Considering we are part of the Family Hominidae - aka great apes - we as a matter of fact ARE apes.

[aeroshock1]

My first when I walk in is, this is like disneyland but no mickey mouse or cool rides!

[swordhunter12]

Also, to "go around your intellect" is to essentially ignore everything you know. How are we supposed to learn anything from that.

[dougmoerhoffman]

@swordhunter12 It's a horrible quote. Unfortunate that they caught whoever that is saying that.

[swordhunter12]

I still can't believe people are still claiming dinosaurs lived with man (yeah I saw the "Stegosaurus" carving and it barely even resembles one. You could just as easily claim it to be a carving of Godzilla). The reason I find it so hard to believe is it begs the question of how could man, in those primitive times, have surved such deadly predators as the Raptors or the T-Rex (if it was a predator . There's supposed to be some debate on whether it was a hunter or a scavenger).

[kmvoss]

At least that priest had some smarts. The bearded man was a baffoon. How can one be so old, seemingly have at least an upper-average IQ, and spout the crap he does?

[dougmoerhoffman]

@kmvoss That's Ken Ham. Respect! lol

[ChibiChaos1234]

@ 4:28

Of course he isn't 'God'; you can prove he exists and he's not a douche about every single thing! XD

[MrConnavar]

i liked that just letting you know

[cadman2300]

After Religulous came out, Ass in Genesis goes out of its way to try and demonize the almighty Mahar but their tirade goes unmentioned on Real Time so it's no threat to Bill one bit.

And no, Bill did not take the Cameron/Comfort clip out of context.

To answer one person's question, Answers (not)in Genesis get's their funding from idiots who buy the crappy books and junk that they produce. These materials reflect Ham's word view of preserving religious dogma as a $-maker over being honest.

[krissyeh]

That guy need to learn how to use a saw. Looks like we are all going to so-called hell where all the fun people will be.

[tokintmash]

You can make a joke out of everything if you edit videos word by word.

What really is funny is that Catholic just admitted He does not believe in God although He claims to be a Christian (as Catholic). He must be lying about one of those things.

The Bible is full on scientific facts. Don't believe this video without checking it out yourself.

See more creationist videos and think as well while watching. Everything can be ridiculed like in this video.

[krissyeh]

Well, tell us of these scientific facts in the bible.

You made the statement prove it by giving those facts.

[tokintmash]

OK. First off, it states a woman was made out of a man. Today we know that men have both X and Y chromosomes while women only have X. So if you had a technology to take them apart, you could make a woman out of a man but not the other way around.

It says locusts walk on 4 legs. It first sounds stupid, but the back legs really do serve a different purpose.

It describes biggest animals on earth yet these descriptions do not match elephant or rhinoceros.

[tokintmash]

The Bible says there are as many stars as there are grains of sand and they're all different.

Now to illustrate what would people at that time think - in The Koran you find that stars are rockets that God uses to shoot demons.

But The Bible states every single one is different. Also you will find that the number of stars and grains of sand is really thought to be the same.

Google yourselves for more, don't just listen to these populists. There are fulfilled prophecies in The Bible etc.

[krissyeh]

That statement just shows how little you know of

genetics. I supose that description meant dinosaur's, oh please (raising eyes).

[tokintmash]

Genetics? Please elaborate.

[krissyeh]

You have just proven my point with that comment.

[tokintmash]

Please explain what exactly do I not understand.

If you do understand it better, please demonstrate :)

[tokintmash]

As for dinosaurs. There have been over 60 human tracks found together with dinosaur's. There should be hundreds of millions years between them, right. Yet they appear in the same layer. Some wearing sandals! There are 2000 year old carvings picturing dinosaurs.

Google a little. Don't just bash around and reject everything that doesn't match your paradigm.

[tokintmash]

Some more: A fossilized human skull was found in solid coal in Germany in 1842. When the coal was broken open, the skull was found inside.

Presumably Tertiary in age, the coal would have far predated the appearance of man, according to evolutionary theory.

[tadhg546]

retard

[tokintmash]

In 1885 at Isidor Brauns foundry in Vocklabruck, Austria, a block of coal was broken and a small steel cube fell out. It had a deep incision around it and the edges were rounded on two of its faces. The owners son took it to the Linz Museum in Austria, but later it was lost. A cast of the cube still remains at the museum

[tokintmash]

In 1912, two employees of the Municipal Electric Plant in Thomas, Oklahoma, were working with some coal that had been mined near Wilburton, Oklahoma. One chunk was too large for the furnace, so it was hit with a sledge and it immediately broke open. An iron pot fell out, leaving an impression (mold) of its shape in the coal. An affidavit was filled out by the two witnesses and the pot was photographed.

[tokintmash]

Originally reported in the Morrisonville, Illinois Times, of June 11, 1891, the 10-inch [25.4 cm] chain was found to be composed of eight-carat gold. When the coal broke apart, part of the chain remained in each piece, holding them together. Thus there is no possibility that the chain had been dropped into the pile of coal.

FYI - coal should be like 300 million years old. So were people living then or is the dating method terribly wrong?

Google for online book "Evolution Cruncher" for much more.

[TheLostGuitarist]

@tokintmash wow are you a poor uneducated fool hahahhaha

you fail

[toelesshoe]

I wonder why the Romans never had a T-Rex devouring christians in the colosseum? The would have been something the historians would mention.

[alphacause]

I love how Ken Ham concludes this video segment by saying that "God is an infinite God who works in ways that we don't always understand".

I would respond back that if that is the case, how can you be so sure that your version of Creation is true, and that God meant Genesis to be taken literally. After all God is a mystery beyond our comprehension, right?

[godlessmessiah]

I think god works in such a way we dont understand ,that the bible should be dismissed as work of the devil, because some of it can be understood...ha ha

[alphacause]

godlessmessiah, you are right. I love how every Christian can tell you, with mind numbing SPECIFICITY, what God thinks about concerning human sexuality, marriage, capital punishment, economics, politics, child/parent relationships, abortion, etc, but when you ask him how God can think and act without a physical dimension, or how God can be uncaused, or why is there suffering in the world, or some other basic question, they respond with "he is too mysterious for us to understand".

[HumanStrategy]

Ironically, the coolest person in this video was the Catholic Priest. ^_^ classic

[temporaldisplacement]

How do these people get funding for this! ...wait ...dont answer that!

[Atheistprimate]

Creationists are without question the most dishonest humans on the planet earth.

[KateW1623]

lol i love it

thanks!

[WhatsAfterThisPlace]

LOL