Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (137)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You gotta wonder if this is where some of the trillions of $ went! Anyone want to comment?

    They are ready to drop these, its on yahoo news! Oh and I hear the drones are going to be flying above us as soon as this spring.. This place we call earth is going to be nuclear waste everywhere!

  • Wow, with all the homeless people we could have made a lot of houses and employ construction workers, get more jobs for 350 million bucks. Instead we got 20 big bombs. Great thinking!

  • $350M per MOP is a deal compared to the long term costs of dealing with a nuclear armed IRAN.

    What is uwmbigb complainnig about. I'm sure less than one penny of his tax dollars ever made there way towards this project.

  • yeahhh 340m, but we can't even afford bullet proof vests and armor for our hummers in iraq, thanks defense dept. what a country

  • what a fine waste of tax payers money

  • COOL! Never in this world would I have thought to ask Kate Beckinsale (Selene) to narrate the vid but she does a great job here ;-)

  • Time to masse produce these babies !

  • 340 million dollars for each bomb? Too expensive.

  • great fucking use of my taxes...

  • I was going to say drop one on the rats in Washington but you're not allow to say that.

  • SOUNDS LIKE USA GOT A PENIS ENLARGEMENT!

  • I'm getting a girlfriend from Iran, so mr president, can you at least wait until I get her safely out of the country?

  • drop this on Wallstreet and the White House

  • @wnxsilance drop it on wallstreet, I lol'd. so much for riot police.

  • You don't need big(expensive) bombs to shut down Iran's nuclear program. With our satelite capability, we can see every entrance and air vent at that facility. You just hit them with WWII dumb bombs with smart equipment attached and everybody inside sufficates before they can be dug out. Then who will run the show?

  • @JB91710 - if we bomb iran it will start WWIII

  • @proaudiohd How would that happen, exactly? Iran couldn't even defeat Iraq in a ten year war.. The US defeated iraq in a couple of weeks. So what exactly are you talking about, hmm?

  • @YouAreAnIdiotSoThere - If a single bomb falls on Iran, they will close the strait and launch a full scale attack on every US interest in the region. That includes our carriers, our bases in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Kuwait, Iraq, Oman, UAE, Georgia, and most importantly, Isreal. That will draw a full scale return fire from both USA and all those nations. But Iran has the backing of Syria, Russia, and most importantly China who have oil & gas interests there. They would arm Iran

  • @proaudiohd how would they attack our carriers? how would they attack our bases? our navy would annihilate theirs in about 2 seconds, our air force would annihilate theirs in about 1 second... and bomb them in to non existence in about .5 seconds.

  • @nipplesasquatch - They have anti-ship cruise missiles .. They have long range missles to hit all our middle eastern bases. Sure we could respond, and eventually bomb all their airfields, but the attacks would come and draw the whole continent into war. Too many crazy bastards over there. I say don't do it, or someone's going to start throwing nuclear weapons around. We are not immune to attacks here at home.

  • @proaudiohd Agreed!!!

  • $340,000,000! How many home foreclosures would that much money prevented?

    $10,000,000,000 to Pakistan to help protect it's borders from Iran and then we go and kill a bunch of Pakistanese and now they are our enemys. How many solar panels and electric generating wind mills would that money have bought?

    Billions to go to Mars! Billions to map the gravity fields of the back side of the Moon! Billions to figure out the origon of the universe! Trillions to kill our fellow man!

    CYOA

  • @JB91710 How many foreclosures would have been prevented if people didnt buy homes they couldnt affort to begin with?

  • @JB91710 Its the governments responsibility to protects its people and its interests with force if necessary.  Having a strong military will make people think twice about even attacking us. It is not the goverments responsibility to bail people out when they dig themselves into a hole they cant dig out of.

  • this is good for bunker busting, but I'd rather have the russian FOAB ICBM largest non nuke bomb to date

  • @UpliftingSmoke watch?v=pZCx9QQXFn0

  • Via con Dios

  • A mi no me molestan mientras que no se metan en mi vida, lei un comentario que los estados unidos quieren el petroleo de iran , todavia estoy esperando el de iraq ni una gota a llegado miren mejor cambien ya ese argumento estados unidos no quiere ningun petroleo de nadie el que quiera que lo vendan aqui se compra de todo el mundo ademas no hay que ir tan lejos en el golfo hay de sobra

  • OK  la otra cosa en que en un barrio no pueden haber dos guapos sobra uno siempre y ante de que nos sorprendan hay que modificarle la salud a estos barbaros es tan facil como eso ademas para estos estremistas todos lo que no profecen su religion somos infieles quien cojone les dijo a estos mal paridos que yo tengo que ser musulman, o que mi hija tenga que andar tapada con una sabana y que hay que matar a pedradas a las mujeres no me jodan partidas de mal paridos

  • Yo no entiendo como hay gente que apoyan las politicas de lo iranies , es desaparecer el estado de israel no es que iran tenga el derecho del armamento atomico,si no es que lleva decadas amenazando con desaparecer a israel , miren israel tiene hace decadas armas atomicas no a amenazado con uzarlas a nadie ,lo que pasa es que no se le puede permitir a unos locos estremistas que con sus locuras nos sorprendan un dia a bombazos atomicos

  • boing builds bombs??????

    next thermo nuclear bomb is invented by Coca Cola and Sony^^ its called "Boom Station zero" (PS-Z)

    haha

  • @headshooter44 Boeing is a defense contractor and aerospace corporation. They have been building military weapons since before WWII, whats so surprising?

  • Game over man.. Game over!

  • Love. That is all.

  • FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP

    - Michael Bay

  • Anyone with a problem, go live in Iran, Afghan or whatever shit country you feel the need to defend. Just remember you liberal bastards, they fucking hate you

  • @yen0yen1690 Not fucking true. Almost no one in the Middle East is a terrorist you ignorant fuck.

  • @yen0yen1690 Does Iran hate France and germany?

  • Just like tupac said

    Theyve got money for war but cant feed the poor!

  • @ninosM1

    Well of course, war is an investment that pays off immediately. Feeding the poor doesn't generate any immediate monetary return.

  • @stp52x yeah investment like destroying innocent countries just for the oil gold etc... so they can have even more money instead of feeding the poor

  • I wish America would get it's hand slapped really good one time. If someone dropped a nuke perhaps the U.S. would stop trying to play "team america world police" And stop poking their nose in other countries business'.

  • America: As long as you YOURSELF got even a SINGLE nuke, SHUT THE FUCK UP about other countries getting nukes. They also just try to defend themselves from crazy fucks …such as YOU.

  • @Evi1M4chine You funny.

  • i got a massive ordnance penetrator in my pants.... yeah that's my cock

  • srat na vas vy debilni americky tlusty drzky

  • @petervondracek durnys, i tyle.

  • i heard they own a huge amount of oil,

    but its ours not their isnt it?

    lets taste it

  • Narrator sounds like GlaDos.  Where's the punch line?

  • @85mehdik1 It seems to confuse you that the US sees Iran as threat against the world. Perhaps it has something to do with Iranians going wild with joy when their leader says it is his life's goal to kill every Jew in Israel. Or that Iran wants to establish Islam as the world's only religion, and will do so by nuclear force. Or that Iran will destroy the West.

    If Iran quits acting like a punk, then maybe it won't get treated like a punk. A connection there perhaps?

  • Massive Ordnance Penetrator? LOL! LOL! stop watching porn... oh wait...

  • I'm really curious about what U.S. Troops are doing 10.000 kilometers away from their home? for peace? no peace comes with the bombs...and what kind of peace is so important for USA to spend billions of money for ?

  • @85mehdik1 ironic that is for sure. you see a surrender would remove the government from Iran and then iranians can hold a real vote without the fraud. amnijinihad was anounced winner of elections only 15 minutes after voting closed. this is obvious fraud.

  • Somebody gonna geta hurt reeeeall baaaad 

  • @2Panzerfaust indeed you cant change a fools mind, so i wont even try.

    But you are BSing about having read them. At best you have seen some crap on the tely which was already criticized by the IAEA for misinterpreting and twisting its reports years ago.

  • Dont equal Iranians to the stupidity of the likes of you, they have no intention to make nukes and use them even if they had the possibility, since they (unlike you) know what the consequences are. Americans speak of a preemptive nuclear strike against Iran having NO IDEA how such things are regulated by the UN. That just comes to show how retarded and clueless the average yank is.

  • @Buuub08 No it shows how credulous Iran THINKS the US is "Trust us! Really, this time we're trustworthy.We know we've lied about everything befpre, & we really ARE working hard to produce weapons grade nuclear material. We even have some. But we won't use it; we just like how it glows."

    So, Mr.VEVAK agent, tell your masters in Tehran the world will start trusting Iran when:Ahmadinejad & all the imams say,"Israel & Jews have a right to exist" Then renounce terrorism. That's a start.

  • @jum1801 Nop it just shows how biased the US is violating everything it supposedly stands for. Tell me about lying, still havent found those WMD's in Iraq making excuses later that the reports about them being there were, i quote "DELIBERATELY misleading". Same shit different day.

    HEU doesnt glow, youve been watching The Simpsons, havent you?

    You should take responsibility for what you do, THAT would be a start and a first for you. Start with Iran, if you want, but 1953 not 2012.

  • Also Iran is NOT producing weapons grade uranium, it doesnt have the capability, the resources nor the intention to manufacture a weapon it cant use and has the brain NOT TO use (unlike some others i wont point at). How many countries have used nukes offensively before? Hmm... hard to count, is it?

  • @Buuub08 You're smoking crack. The invasion of Iraq pretty much said "If you don't actually have nukes, you run the risk of being invaded" so Iran definitely put their nuclear program into high gear at that point. Nuclear weapons aren't supposed to be used, they're for deterrence. Iran pretty obviously has the capability to produce HEU and is working hard on developing the necessary technology to put together a credible deterrent.

  • @Nater245689 First of all there was never a thought that Iraq might have nukes. The WMDs in Iraq were Anthrax, Mustard gas, Botulism and so forth, ALL OF WHICH was acquired from NATO.

    Iran doesnt have the technology, the resources nor an actual purpose to make a nuke. First of all because there is no point in that since it signed NPT and in case of a violation foreign military intervention is guaranteed. That is the last thing Iran needs right now.

  • Iran currently has support from China and Russia (SCO in general) and it doesnt want to lose it. It signed the NTP, it signed additional document that allow inspection of the sites by foreign experts with no prior notice at any time. The facilities are monitored, the material is imported and exported (nothing stays in Iran), and the IAEA has noted NO violations in the program. However yanks are gonna keep on pushing. Why? Because Iran is the last line to total US dominance in the PG.

  • Iran might pull off a nuke, maybe two... then what? The fuck can you do with two nukes? Nothing but piss people off. They dont want that and they dont need that. What they need is electricity for a country that has a drastic shortage of it due to rapid growth in population and industrialization. How about Americans give up their nukes and NPP? They are more likely to use them than the rest combined given the fact that they already have done it before and are extremely aggressive.

  • @Buuub08 Iran is an oil exporter. They need nukes for power like saudi arabia needs sand for building more desert. Not even the Iranians buy those excuses.

  • @Buuub08 Except the IAEA has noted that Iran has sought to acquire precision detonators (crucial for nuclear weapons) and modified missile nose cones to permit larger payloads. You truly do not understand what nuclear weapons are for. They are not meant to be used in actual combat, they're meant to deter and enemy from attacking.

  • @Nater245689 precision detonators and nose cones are not necessarily related to nuclear weapons and are completely legal up acquire and develop. Dont twist facts to your liking. IAEA also noted traces of plutonium which the media twisted into some sort of evidence that Iran makes nukes, in reality traces of plutonium do not indicate anything but enrichment taking place (which is fully legal under the NPT).

  • As long as Iran does not violate the NPT it knows it has back-up from SCO, which what keeps Americans away. Going into Iran just like that would result in a conflict between SCO and US. No one wants that. Which is why they are actually trying to make everything look as if Iran is making nukes (same BS scenario as with Iraq - make the world believe lies to start a war). If Iran makes nukes it will lose the little support it has, and then its green light for the war with no one to help.

  • @Buuub08 How stupid do you think Iran is? It'll deploy a few prototype bombs operationally, then it'll test. They'll have their deterrence. You'd really have to strain credulity to imagine Iran NOT trying to acquire nuclear weapons.

  • @Nater245689 It cant make a few prototype bombs, it would take a decade to make even couple given the current technology available to it. You kinda seem to think you can make 20 bombs in 15 minutes. Thats not how it works, and it cannot work principally if you have no uncontrolled source of material nor an unmonitored facility to pull it off AND keeping it all hidden. Iran couldnt make a nuke a single even if it wanted to. It could, in theory, make a dirty bomb though.

  • Even if they would have a couple nukes, that will not help them in any case. That would only make them lose the little support they have and give the green light to a war. As long as they DONT have one the US has NO RIGHT to go in. Try to get it. Even if they would have a couple, they would not help them, they would not stop a foreign military intervention (in that case possibly nuclear as well) and would lose Russian and Chinese support - which is currently the ONLY thing saving Iran.

  • @Buuub08 In one past you say Iran can't make HEU, in another you say traces of plutonium indicated enriching activities. Which is it? It's pretty obvious Iran is enriching uranium which is not necessary for a civil program. It's buying up precision detonators. It's buying modified nose cones for larger payloads. The sort of weapons it could build would likely be bulky. Do the math.

  • @Nater245689 Precision detonators and nose cones are NOT necessarily linked to nuclear weapons. In fact a nuclear weapon doesnt need a missile with a large payload capability, a conventional warhead would benefit from it far more. Nothing forbids the research or purchase of such technology. Dont make stupid assumptions, i think you are smart enough not to.

  • @Buuub08 Read my post, I didn't say Iraq had nuclear weapons, or even a program to develop them. NATO didn't supply Iraq with biological weapons as every NATO state with the capability had long been BWC compliant. Not that it matters, you can buy samples of most weaponizable agents on the open market.

  • @Nater245689 NATO did supply them. Look it up, the deals were public (equipment from UK, US, France, Germany) shaking hands with Rumsfeld, being called an ally and being awarded the key to Detroit.

    Being in the NPT means everything since in the case of violation of the treaty the UNSC has all the right for a direct military intervention. So in fact a nuke is the opposite of what Iran wants as that will only accomplish what the US wants from them.

  • @Buuub08 Supply them with weapons? Of course. Supply them with BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS as you stated? Definitely not. Here is a little fact for you, the sort of molecular biology equipment needed for legit research is also the same equipment that is needed for biological weapons. It's a highly dual use field.

  • @Nater245689 You didnt supply them with bio weapons, you sold them to Saddam. As far as the US goes: Anthrax, West Nile virus and botulism. Britain built a mustard gas factory, Spain gave munitions and whole list of countries gave/sold equipment and materials for chem/bio weapon manufacture. France and Italy provided materials for nuclear programs without IAEA control (including HEU) and so forth. Saddam was your buddy. Nothing dual about it.

  • @Buuub08 NPT means nothing as the UNSC likely wouldn't do anything beyond sanctions. They'd be very unlikely to pursue military action. The United States and the British would likely push for it, but China and Russia definitely wouldn't be on board. It wouldn't happen via violations of the NPT. Politically, this scenario isn't "there".

  • @Nater245689 You are obviously unaware what the NPT includes and what kind of sanctions it foresees. Military action is inevitable in case of violation. The US and British push on it regardless because they want the oil since 1953.

    Making HEU and plutonium traces dont contradict each other in any way. First of all Iran is making LEU, perfectly legal.

  • @Buuub08 Furthermore, being an NPT signatory doesn't really mean anything. Iran has an enemy of the most powerful nation on Earth. Developing nuclear weapons as a counter balance makes obvious sense.

  • @Buuub08 Lastly, building nuclear weapons, particularly gun-type fission designs, certainly isn't high technology anymore. The only technically challenging part of it is acquiring enough HEU. Iran is well on their way to doing that with their masses of centrifuges. Provided enough HEU, you could build a functional, if crude, gun-type weapon with three engineers, an electrician, and a machinist along with appropriate tooling. Iran isn't doing this, but it demonstrates the fact.

  • @Nater245689 Iran cant make HEU, its centrifuges are not capable of it, it doesnt have unmonitored facilities, it doesnt have uncontrolled uranium to work with and it would take years for them to make a nuke. To be an effective deterrent Iran would need a stockpile counting at least 200 units just fall from the sky with an effective delivery system before anyone can react. As soon as Iran makes just one nuke the US will have all the right to start a war and the one nuke wont help.

  • @Buuub08 Oh, one final thing. You're right, Iran doesn't want to go to war with the United States. Which is exactly why they want nuclear weapons. A credible nuclear deterrent more or less guarantees that the United States will not seriously consider attacking Iran. Certainly not invade it.

  • All the nuclear material is controlled by international specialists (Russian), its imported under supervision, enriched under supervision, used under supervision and the waste is exported back under supervision. Iran does not and can not make a nuke. Iran has signed the NPT and additional documents that allow inspection of the site at any time with no prior notice. US experts can just go there and see for themselves. Do they? No, instead they make up BS.

  • nuke those ragheads

  • @Buuub08 u keep thinking that comrade. Hell its been no secret for years that iran is trying to achieve the nuke...go ask an iranian

  • @misterdomination256 Iran doesnt have the capability to do it, thats one.

    2ndly all the enrichment facilities are under foreign control and all of the material is being monitored to the extent of no Iranian even coming near it.

    3rdly none of the facilities is capable of enriching uranium to even a fraction of the necessary amount, the theoretical maximum is about 20%.

    4thly EVERY country has the right to have nuclear energy.

  • Its amusing how Americans dont even know their own history. Iran has a legit and proper democratically elected government. What happened? The man in charge came up with the idea that Iranian oil belongs to Iran. So the CIA removed it in 1953 replacing it with a maniac Nazi criminal which was, oddly enough, completely fine with them as long as BP got Iranian oil. So much for democracy and freedom.

  • @Buuub08 and seriously when was it that Iran decided to include you in its most secretive inner workings..anyone who knows anything about nuclear energy understands that at the point they now can enrich the uranium to that it would take no more than a few steps to enrich that to a percentage of bomb grade material..and no a country that makes it a practice to hold public rallies calling for the death of america and her allies doesn't deserve to harness any nuclear capability..

  • @misterdomination256 you littaraly dont know what you talk about. And what US did in 58.. what Sovjet did in 58 or what germanny did in 1945 or japan in 1943. It has NOTHING to do with what PERSIONS do for 30 years. Can we blame the muslims world for what Al quida did 10 years ago? There is no logic- only attempts to legitimize you hate towards another nation.

    Iran has regardless of US- continuesly LIED to the world about its nuclear program AND they are EVIL , and THREAT other nations.

  • Comment removed

  • @xassxass all i am saying to you is this and plain..do u hear the worlds holders of nuclear weapons day in and day out calling for the destruction of people? NO do u hear Israel doing it? NO do u hear the UK doing it..NO the USA NO! Japan? NO do u then hear chants within the streets rallied by the mullahs concerning death to israel and america? why hell fucking yes u do and thats my point

  • @xassxass its kinda like this as i said..!4 year olds arent responsible within their actions to own and carry guns with them..and yes im comparing the maturity on a grand scale of iran and a 14 yr old.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Why do you consider them evil and a threat to other nations? There is not a shred of proof there! It is Israel who assassinates their scientists. It is USA who spies on them and invades their airspace. Iran is a very mature and peaceful nation, and their track record proves they are no threat! They produce 1/3 of world's oil, so how can you even imagine that they would want to "attack" someone and jeopardize all of that. It makes no logic! Iran already has what it needs!

  • @tropickman I consider Iran a threat to other nations because they constatnly lie about their nuclear program to the world. Wikeleaks revealed that most terror in Iraq was done by Iran. That every friday for 25 years- they been chanting death to Israel, death to USA, that they was the one who declared war on US- (did so in the 80s), that they use terror agains their own people, that they have a religion that belives in mahdi- who shall come when world is in chaos.. shall i continue? Iran= HELL

  • @tropickman And may I advice you to watch some documentary about HaJ Husseini- the palestinian mufti who ended up brainwashing half of the ME thanks to his visit to Adolf Hilter and translation of his propaganda.

    Amadinasjad and hilter- speak the same - they belive the same- they value the same. So let me ask you- woudl you like hilter to have the nuclear bomb ..oh and I may add they also LIE the same..

    Im shocked that today "intelectual" such as you- FAIL to see what is going on. its 1930!

  • @Buuub08 even in the USA we dont allow prideful and pissed off 11 year olds the right to posses and carry hand guns..it would spell for disaster

  • Comment removed

  • @Buuub08 This is bullshit what you say. Even IRAN confirms it.

    Why do the idiots in Teheran previously called their rockets program for part of their nuclear program?

    For too long- regardless of any ohter nations behaviour- Iran has decived, betrayid and threaten the world community with its continuesly talk of extermination of other nations as well as their refuse to cooperate.

    This alone- combined with how they treat their own people is reason alone to take the bull by the horn.

  • @xassxass They dindt call anything. Its CNN that called them like that.

    The only one who threatens anyone is in fact the US threatening Iran even speaking of a NUCLEAR strike against it as if you hadnt killed enough people for NOTHING already.

    You are idiot if you believe the same shit they are trying to sell you for the second time already. You bought it with Iraq and you are buying it with Iran, one could assume people learn from mistakes. Go figure.

  • @Buuub08 wrong. And even terrorist groups around Israel is now using the mushroom cloud as their new symbol. If you listen to Iraqi generals -they confirm that Saddams WMD did get sucessfully smuggled into SYRIA- just weeks before the invasion. Saddam new he was gonna get invaded- and did a second best solution for him, and thanks to a flood in syria saddam loaded several plains with "aid" and transferred it all to syria- right under US nose. IRAN is evil and you know by how they treat their own

  • better drop this shit on israel

  • @BrygadaTM why? the usa has already supplied them with plenty to drop back

  • Why would a 3rd world country need a nuclear power plant? Who's going to fund the maintenance? Who's going to use the power in a gobal recession in a 3rd world country? What's Irians true reason for this madness?

  • @Buuub08 building a nuclear bomb is actually considerably easier than building a nuclear power plant.

    I agree with you about them having the right to, but disagree that they don't have the capability to build a bomb.

  • @override367 They have the capabilities for a nuclear war head, but not for a more than battlefield range missile, and they don't have the airforce to drop it on anyone either. Besides the fact that they are surrounded by puppet states of nuclear powers that hate them and have 100,000 nukes pointed at them so I could understand the want to have a nuke.

  • Comment removed

  • Smoke-em if you got-em.

  • Fucking American gangster state

  • 10トン超爆弾。地下施設を破壊する目的で開発された模様。第二­次大戦の時もあった気がする。

  • it's like a US dick that will hit iran's pussy's!

    i hope all iranian's will moan!

    ^_^),,l,,

  • @denesse03 you are a fucking gay !

  • A funny thing happened on our way to Afghanistan from Iraq....a few of the MOPS dislodged and fell into Iran...ooops!

  • now that is a cool toy

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more