i had a thought, as we're looking back in time the further we look is it possible that the actual amount of galaxies we see are far less than is in the picture. like for eg we see say 1000 galaxies, but actually it's only 100 just that we're seeing the same 100 at different times of it's life. and having said that how comes we don't see 'trails' or 'snakes' of light where these galaxies have been.
@beastdude Your not seeing the same galaxies at different times your seeing different galaxies at the same time. The galaxies farthest away from us that are dimmer in the photo are actually older today than the galaxies near us. You will not see trails of light in the exposed Hubble photo because they are moving too slow for you to notice.
To think that in our 1 galaxy has life on one planet and if there are like millions of other galaxies out there, there is obviously life somewhere else its amazing !! :P
How in the world would some of the theoretical space travelers find our planet in the milky way...and then come and do a fly by..they must be contained here already!
What is everything, and what is out there. We're a speck of dust on an island(Milky Way Galaxy) amongst hundreds of billions of islands out there - the Universe is an archipelago of Galaxies.
Also this image shows what these galaxies looked like several billion years ago cause it takes light from those stars that long to reach us. We are looking into the past which is amazing
@bbvibrabb Yea. If you look at this image in google in some crazy high resolution like 12000 x 12000 pixels, you can actually see that galaxies that are futher away are less "evolved", more messy and less dense, they're still in early stages of their development. And galaxies closer to us on that picture are more developed, nice and spiral.
Sal really missed something in this video, the only stars in the photograph are the points of light with a "plus sign" of light shining from it. EVERY OTHER POINT on the picture is an entire galaxy.
After this video, Sal spent the rest of the day circling galaxies.
Imagine if those lines Sal draws in the pictures appear in reality around those galaxies at the same rate/speed. Each circle is thicker than most of the stuff that's in the encircled galaxy.
@zackboomer But then again, without something to observe the universe, could it even "exist"? How would time exist? What would observe time and change? Don't get that confused with the typical "tree falling in the woods" example as it's entirely different. Without a reference point, the entire evolution of the universe, all time, would simply pass in an instant. Perhaps we aren't so insignificant afterall.
@maulcs Time is a creation of man. It existed before us, and we simply give a name and quantity to it. As well, the universe would obviously exist without us to observe, because it existed before our species, and will continue exist after our species.
@zackboomer In what context will it exist without something to observe it? What would a billion years be to a universe without consciousness? What would anything be without something to observe the passage of time?
@maulcs it seems that you are focused more on the philosophy aspect of the question. Even just focusing on Earth, which has been around for roughly 4.54 billion years - the Earth still existed for billions of years before we were around to record its history, yet we are aware of and have knowledge of the times before us. Unless you are thinking about some sort of "higher power" or even another civilization that watched over our planet until we came along, then the earth still existed without
@zackboomer I'm focusing on a practical issue. I used to think in the exact same way as you do, but you have to think broadly about what time is, and how we observe it. When you think of the universe "existing" without consciousness, you are still thinking about it from a perspective of some conscious being. Time passes for an observer in some way. What if you remove that observer? "Time" would be instantaneous. *snap* It's over, done.
@zackboomer Oh no this doesn't make me feel insignificant, the ability to perceive a condensed image of somthing of unimaginable scale is undoutably a very special gift, sure it is most likly shared with other beings within the universe but as a percentage of all large clumps of matter in the universe I'd estimate aproximatly 0% of them have such abilities.
Sal, these vids are great - Thanks very much for making all of them.
Could you consider using a bigger cursor so it is easier to see where you are pointing on screen. That small cursor you use is difficult to see. i have seen you use an arrow-shaped cursor before that is easier to see.
wonder-ful. you should mention how it was Hubble who basically identified the first galaxy. what a mind-expanding realization that must have been for him and everyone else at the time. and that wasn't even 100 years ago
We have so much left to explore, the possibilities are amazing and endless. Our world may seem large to us, but the scale and magnitude of everything around it- so hard to fathom.
i had a thought, as we're looking back in time the further we look is it possible that the actual amount of galaxies we see are far less than is in the picture. like for eg we see say 1000 galaxies, but actually it's only 100 just that we're seeing the same 100 at different times of it's life. and having said that how comes we don't see 'trails' or 'snakes' of light where these galaxies have been.
beastdude 6 days ago
@beastdude Your not seeing the same galaxies at different times your seeing different galaxies at the same time. The galaxies farthest away from us that are dimmer in the photo are actually older today than the galaxies near us. You will not see trails of light in the exposed Hubble photo because they are moving too slow for you to notice.
dissturbbed 4 days ago
@beastdude The speed of light is constant, so we can't have light from the same object hitting us at different times.
falubii 2 days ago
Sal, thank you so much for your hard work man. You're an excellent lecturer, congrats on your ongoing and continual success
numbchucking 1 week ago
wow, those are cool galaxies. thanks!:)
morethanlyf1 1 week ago
2 people are racist against galaxies.
bamiles84 3 weeks ago
That is a galaxy.
That is a galaxy.
That is a galaxy.
That is a galaxy.
adgsTV 1 month ago
How do people look out into the night sky and still think God is responsible for all this?
Jwest720 1 month ago
@Jwest720 Because nothing disproves it. Religion however, that's another thing.
nils4545 1 month ago
@Jwest720 ... how could you think it was all just a random accident?
bamiles84 3 weeks ago
The government damn well better not decide to scratch funding for the James Webb Space Telescope.
WorriedMitchell 1 month ago
Ooh check out that one!
Shes one HOT galaxy!
tviksas 2 months ago
"The whole point of this video is really just to blow your mind!" -- Love it (it worked)
yamenhawit 2 months ago
i want ppl to go to these galaxies
leedsrhinos3201 2 months ago
gr8t vids kepp them cuming
kingpranw141180 2 months ago
@zenoparodie i just find it so just WOW :D :P !
holychrist24 3 months ago
One word - awesome!
lucidaable 3 months ago
To think that in our 1 galaxy has life on one planet and if there are like millions of other galaxies out there, there is obviously life somewhere else its amazing !! :P
holychrist24 3 months ago in playlist More videos from khanacademy
@holychrist24 there are 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe :P
zenoparodie 3 months ago
The 1 dislike must of been an alien that got left on earth.Must be lost. lol
sootyandteddy 3 months ago
How in the world would some of the theoretical space travelers find our planet in the milky way...and then come and do a fly by..they must be contained here already!
Uniztone 3 months ago
What is everything, and what is out there. We're a speck of dust on an island(Milky Way Galaxy) amongst hundreds of billions of islands out there - the Universe is an archipelago of Galaxies.
LaPersonaNonGrata 4 months ago
This makes Golliwogg's head spin.
GolliwoggMusic 4 months ago
Also this image shows what these galaxies looked like several billion years ago cause it takes light from those stars that long to reach us. We are looking into the past which is amazing
bbvibrabb 5 months ago 4
@bbvibrabb Yea. If you look at this image in google in some crazy high resolution like 12000 x 12000 pixels, you can actually see that galaxies that are futher away are less "evolved", more messy and less dense, they're still in early stages of their development. And galaxies closer to us on that picture are more developed, nice and spiral.
derbigpr500 4 months ago
Sal really missed something in this video, the only stars in the photograph are the points of light with a "plus sign" of light shining from it. EVERY OTHER POINT on the picture is an entire galaxy.
vicksoma 9 months ago 2
3:45 "look at.. that's..... that's... that's a nice looking galaxy right there" lol. Did his wife watch this vid?
artashes999 9 months ago
this dude is seriously geeking out haha
wirednotice 10 months ago
i watch this series of videos for fun :D
dewijones92 11 months ago 6
This is one of m favorite pictures too I used it on my background.
Shaunt1 1 year ago
Comment removed
IdontacceptTermsOfSe 1 year ago
Hahah "That's a nice looking galaxy right there"
It sure is Sal!
econguy87 1 year ago
It's weird that you are circling certain galaxies. 99% of those specks are galaxies.
maulcs 1 year ago
Least dense with instruction but most dense with inspiration
DeluxeWarPlaya 1 year ago 36
one of your best
warrenlaurde 1 year ago
imagine how much intelligent life out there!
lucasmontec 1 year ago
@lucasmontec imagine how many people belive that we are alone in this universe:|
Ady00pk 1 year ago 6
The Hubbles needs to go all CSI on the sky's ass and reveal all its secrets
KEEP ON ZOOMING HORATIO! ZOOM AND ENHANCE!
MistaFrista 1 year ago
The bottom half of this image is now my desctop background :)
bradkey98765 1 year ago
Nice, but all of the bright clusters that are visible at such a distance would more than likely be galaxies as well. Every little swirl.
moali68 1 year ago 2
I liked the part where he circled another galaxy.
f3989 1 year ago 2
Lmao, I was waiting for you to start sobbing uncontrollably while circling the galaxies.
metabog 1 year ago
"The point of this really... is to blow your mind."
Awesome, I love these videos.
Hexonip 1 year ago
I am waiting to see images from the James Webb Telescope. It probably even more breath taking than this one
homousios 1 year ago
if one of those things was a nearby star it would bent the light from the galaxies.... they dont seem to be distorted ...
asseeninYOURDREAMS 1 year ago
amazing
MrFFSMAN 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrFFSMAN 1 year ago
Sal you missed one of the galaxies
Taheki 1 year ago 67
@Taheki You made my day with that joke. I think he missed the one on the left too.
Lucuskane 1 year ago
After this video, Sal spent the rest of the day circling galaxies.
Imagine if those lines Sal draws in the pictures appear in reality around those galaxies at the same rate/speed. Each circle is thicker than most of the stuff that's in the encircled galaxy.
FHomeBrew 1 year ago
and people still think earth is the only planet with life...hahaha
kvn89 1 year ago 2
makes all of us seem so small and insignificant
zackboomer 1 year ago 3
@zackboomer But then again, without something to observe the universe, could it even "exist"? How would time exist? What would observe time and change? Don't get that confused with the typical "tree falling in the woods" example as it's entirely different. Without a reference point, the entire evolution of the universe, all time, would simply pass in an instant. Perhaps we aren't so insignificant afterall.
maulcs 1 year ago
@maulcs Time is a creation of man. It existed before us, and we simply give a name and quantity to it. As well, the universe would obviously exist without us to observe, because it existed before our species, and will continue exist after our species.
zackboomer 1 year ago
@zackboomer In what context will it exist without something to observe it? What would a billion years be to a universe without consciousness? What would anything be without something to observe the passage of time?
maulcs 1 year ago
@maulcs it seems that you are focused more on the philosophy aspect of the question. Even just focusing on Earth, which has been around for roughly 4.54 billion years - the Earth still existed for billions of years before we were around to record its history, yet we are aware of and have knowledge of the times before us. Unless you are thinking about some sort of "higher power" or even another civilization that watched over our planet until we came along, then the earth still existed without
zackboomer 1 year ago
@maulcs anyone to contemplate its existance
zackboomer 1 year ago
@zackboomer I'm focusing on a practical issue. I used to think in the exact same way as you do, but you have to think broadly about what time is, and how we observe it. When you think of the universe "existing" without consciousness, you are still thinking about it from a perspective of some conscious being. Time passes for an observer in some way. What if you remove that observer? "Time" would be instantaneous. *snap* It's over, done.
maulcs 1 year ago
@zackboomer Oh no this doesn't make me feel insignificant, the ability to perceive a condensed image of somthing of unimaginable scale is undoutably a very special gift, sure it is most likly shared with other beings within the universe but as a percentage of all large clumps of matter in the universe I'd estimate aproximatly 0% of them have such abilities.
bradkey98765 1 year ago
@zackboomer Small yes. Insignificant no, because what significance would the universe have without observers?
Judicial78 1 year ago 5
Thank you so much Sal
PartVIII 1 year ago
Sal, these vids are great - Thanks very much for making all of them.
Could you consider using a bigger cursor so it is easier to see where you are pointing on screen. That small cursor you use is difficult to see. i have seen you use an arrow-shaped cursor before that is easier to see.
Great stuff - Thanks
zalida100 1 year ago
wonder-ful. you should mention how it was Hubble who basically identified the first galaxy. what a mind-expanding realization that must have been for him and everyone else at the time. and that wasn't even 100 years ago
Techra 1 year ago
every single blip on that image is a galaxy.
pxxner 1 year ago
Definitely sweet.
silencedfable 1 year ago
Unbelievable.. Hahah.. Definitely inspirational. Thanks for this ;)
joshuarawr 1 year ago
Makes you wonder if they're are people in some of those galaxies wondering if they're is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe lol.
95TurboSol 1 year ago
Khan I haz cheeze? :D
dilibau 1 year ago
We have so much left to explore, the possibilities are amazing and endless. Our world may seem large to us, but the scale and magnitude of everything around it- so hard to fathom.
Rawrishable 1 year ago
Thank you so much for making these videos! You help me so much through college! PLEASE dont ever stop!
Rawrishable 1 year ago