Added: 3 years ago
From: BipolarTiger
Views: 99,786
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (133)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the ones they are talking about here are asiatic lions

    the popular tiger vs lion debate is about comparing tigers with african lions not asiatic lions

    asiatic lions in india are much smaller than african lions

  • Many people don't understand that both (tiger and Lion) are super predators and both have advantages and disadvantages when it comes to fighting one another. Now I've seen tigers chasing away Lions and I've also seen lions chasing away Tigers. I say that they both have a 50 / 50 and it depends on how angry the creature is before an actual fight. Usually the most ferocious one ends up beating the less offensive one.

  • They are talking about asiatic lions on this video which are lighter than african lions,there is not much difference between a male african lion and a male bengal tiger as afr as weight goes,the biggest diffence in a fight between the two,comes down to the warrior factor,a male lion has to fight all the way through its life where as a tiger is a hunter.my money would be on the lion,its power and confidence would shade it,the mane would also help.

  • She's full of shit. Usually, tigers run.  They won't fight a lion. When they do fight it can go either way, usually the lion wins.

  • tiger = stronger/heaver/faster/more agile

    lion = lazy/lighter/not very agile

    hmm yah i think i know who is king its very clear

  • guys they are evenly matched but the tiger is advantaged if they make them move in the same space a tiger can kill a lion easily people portray a lion as strong but it is only strong in numbers if i had to choose i would choose a tiger why because a tiger is just a better fighter we are talking about a lion which leaves the hunting to the females and just fights for terratories a tiger protects it's territory and hunts guar the worlds largest cattle and they would cross breed

  • did any one else see the lion fart at 0:50 lol

  • SUCK IT lion supporters!

  • They better not do that. Lions are PACK hunters/fighters, and being so, they would slowly push Tigers near extinction. DO NOT PLACE LIONS IN TIGER COUNTRY.

  • In areas where the tiger learn how to fight a lion since childhood the tiger are favourite to win. Other places the lion has few advantages like mane..

  • @SaeedBaba

    What areas? There are no overlapping areas in the wild where Lions and Tigers cross. Not even in India.

    Want to know why Lions made it out of Africa as far east as India but Tigers never got further than the middle east? It's because the Lions chased them back east.

  • @darthinfurnus You are wrong. The reason why tigers did not go west of the Middle East is because they need habitats with enough water. Between the Middle East and Africa lie desserts. For tigers, to make it inside Africa would have meant cross the Sahara Dessert, something impossible for this big cat. Lions on the other hand are more adapted to arid environments, that is why they could make it out of Africa.

  • bengal tiger can own both african & asiatic lion.

  • @whitehollow1 your retarded they actually try to avoid each other and you can never tell who is going to win as lions kill tiger and tiger kills lion you can suck mah b@lllllllllls

  • And that is the Indian tiger, not the larger Siberian tiger.

  • That is the Asiatic Indian Lion, not the larger African Lion.

  • whaat ? why is it all the youtube filled with tiger wins videoos ??!!!!!!!!l

  • @esmaelooo its because tiger owns lion.

  • @whitehollow1 hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh sooo that's your arguement ((( duuuude tiger ruuules yeeeh ))) and that's it ??? lion bones are bigger than a tiger and taller not longer plus he's more verosous and agressive than tiger but true tiger is heavier and longer than a lion . IN HISTORIC TIMES THe BARBARIC LION KILLED THE TIGERS IN ROMAN TIMES WHE THEY RULED OVER NORTHERN AFRICA

    the african lion is a desendent of this lion k.

  • @esmaelooo lion is taller than tiger, but tiger is longer, heavier, faster, more agil, longer canines, more bite force and more ferocious than lion.

    btw, in roman empire tiger usually won against lion. its fact.

  • @whitehollow1 NO YOU GOT THIS WRONG lion is taller not more agile but less ferocious ?????? un true a lion doesn't submit to OTHER LIONS OR BIG CATS LIKE IN AVIDEO OF TIGERS ATTACKING LION HE PINS THEM OFF everytime and they come back IF A SNGLE TIGER KILLS LION THEN WHY THE NEED OF THREE TIGERS AND WHY ON EVERY VIDEO THE LION BEING KILLED NEVER APPEARS WHILE IN 1946 PIT FIGHT VIDEO. IT IS SHOWN THE TIGER GETTING KILLED NOW WE ARE DISCUSSING NO NEED for swearings and accusations

  • sooo how did NAT GEO prefer the tiger ????? hah

  • male lions will fight and most likely kill any other cat for almost no reason...even tigers!a roar from a lion would make a tiger pee a little!

  • Why do you think the Aisiatic Lion is basically extinct? BECAUSE THEY WERE SHARING THE JUNGLE WITH TIGERS, Tigers are territorial and don't want other cats in their area, so the tigers kill the lions.

  • These Lions are much smaller than African Lions.

    Its a different ballgame for a Tiger to meet a male African Lion. They`re about the same size.

  • the only country having tigers and lions in their wildlife habitat is india!!

  • no, tigers are gods of the jungle lol, and EVEN kings bow to gods

  • Aaaand that settles it. Tigers are THE Supercat. That ridiculous "animal faceoff" show on discovery channel is a joke meant for 12 year old boys. I'll take the word of National Geographic when it comes to the facts, thank you. The larger and stronger opponent will almost always win, and so it is with tigers and lions.

  • is mohamad a mas murderer or rapist?

  • Tiger win in past,today and future TIGER ------> EMPEROR!!!

  • @vrata78 absolutely! in your dreams.

  • TERRORIST izlam=DANGER.

  • @teachtruth2U Holy crap!! OSAMA!!!

  • i like this

  • national geographic NEVER said that the tiger would win in a fight. This is a fucking documentary called "last lions of India'. It premiered on Animal Planet too, does that mean that animal planet also supports the tiger in a fight?Hell no...how desperate r u?Go figure...

    Animal face off actually has experts from AP & they said the lion would win. So animal planet supports the lion. Natgeo didnt say anything.End of story.

  • @TheBuffaloKiller Accounts from Roman coliseum times have it that tigers usually lost to lions and the deciding factor was---the lion has a protective mane around its neck/throat. Soldier with a shield has advantage over one without. But individual lions & tigers vary the biggest tigers could often defeat smaller lions & vice versa "contests" may be rigged to show outcome biased source wants to show as in comparing bite of 60lb pit to 150lb Rott they use smaller pits & big R's get result wanted

  • @skirts365

    well...heres what I have to say about the dog thing. Pitbull terriers are usually 50-60 lbs. 70 or more lbs is obese. the ones that are used in dog fights are just mutts. A 60 lb pitt is large. A 150 lb rott is large. So there you have it. Both the pitts & the rotties were large for their size.

  • thats fuckin right baby

  • tiger rules !!!

  • tiger kills and eat lions

  • too lucky for the lions that the tiger don't live in Africa if not the tiger will kills the lions

  • @treocaotedau

    lions & tigers shared turf for thousands of years in Iran,India, & the Caucasus. The lions dominated & took a higher stance in culture, tales, & history. Tales of the lion's dominance are told in old indian stories. So, tiger will not kill the lions.

  • All of you people debating about like who'd own who, tiger or lion, are idiots... They are kinds of animals, not fucking UFC fighters. You all are crazy people, I think you'd be satisfied seeing one of these animals kill the other. Get a life, fucking retards...

  • Get a brain moron

  • Yes, tigers outclass, marginally though, lions regarding size, agility & strength. But more importantly they are smarter than lions & at times avoid a fight that is not going to yield anything..

  • yea but then again the biggest tiger ever was 424kg and 351kg for a lion and guess where i read this o yes guinnes world record.. obs tiger have a avrage of 80-100kg and SIZE DO MATTER=)

  • i know even with humans who is fighting with echother why are they saying size do not matter? fuck them

  • No its not. These people are total idiots. Since when did national geographic focus on animals anyway?Animal planet focus on animals and they support the lion.

  • Comment removed

  • trrinita you are wrong ur a fag and should shut up Tigers are better.

  • I dont get why the say 50 kilo more weight so the tiger wins. Weight does not give a win. Very stupid they say that.

  • just search lion vs tiger fight videos on youtube and you'll see that 99% of the time, the lion would lose in a real fight.

  • Because there are more video's about it does not mean it is the end result.

    There are way more things you need to look at then weight or videos that are online. We will never really know who would win. You will know when a lion and tiger of same age fitness and all. Only when this is like it then you can say who would win. But even then. Lions are more hold back. Look at every video posted. They check it out more. Tigers are more agressive. But we will NEVER know who is stronger. Or better

  • He he all the experts are saying tigers can defeat lions.

  • Only Siberian Tigers have a 50 kilo advantage. Bengals are usually a bit smaller than African Lions.

  • In this instance, national geographic are talking about asiatic lions not african lions, because they want to boost the population of the asiatic lion which is at about 300 - 400, however they see the bengal tiger as a threat.

    I personally don't see the problem, if you consider that just a century or 2 ago the lion had the biggest population besides humans and I think the largest population went to the asian lion, and back then the tiger and lion must have crossed paths all the time.

  • LIONS SUCK BALLS

  • what is this show called by the way?

  • This is another very gay video from a tiger lover homo.we all know that the magnificent lion is THE KING OF ALL BEASTS!!!!!

  • I find this a grave suggestion as far as the tigers in India are concerned. As it is a tiger is struggling to retain its habitat. I am sure that a tiger would come on tops when pitted 1 to 1 against a lion. But the sheer challenge this throws would further deplete the tiger numbers. A lion is the king of the plains and the tiger, a king of the dense tropical forest. It should stay that way without any unwanted human interference.

  • all of you on this post are fuckin no lifes. i just looked at this because my friend told me to read some of the comments on here. seriously,lion owns tiger. who cares ,they are animals! they do what they do best, try to live. lames...

  • seriously huh? and u favor the lions. you dont know shit. just shut ur mouth up and accept the truth!

  • Lions r WAY better. For one they can sleep all day and relax, they never really do the hunting and they always get the first go at the meal when it arrives, when it comes to fighting anything in their habitat they beat the shit out of anything and get what they want. Oh and they get to mate with a SHIT LOAD of females within the pride. Therefore lions = KING OF BEASTS, fuck all you tiger loving homos the lions OWN the tiger. :)

  • fuck ur lion ass homo!! accept the truth that ur lion is a bitch when faced with the tiger. graahhhh..

  • ur the bitch. :D dont reply bak plz thx

  • funny hahaha.. whos the bitch now?!!??!?!

  • aee mother fucker shut your fuck up with ur gay tyiger lions can kill an elephant wieght 8000 punds ur fuckin tiger can only kill a calf and as far as weight is concern open ur fuckin browser and browse barbarian lion thn u aint gona speak this shit again see ya gay lover

  • hey fuckin homo, try to straighten up ur english first before confronting me ok. u fuckin lion prostitute. fuck urself on ur bathroom! aiyt!! :D never go out again!

  • The Siberian Tiger is known to grow as large as 13 feet long and 900 pounds. It could kill a single lion with ease. It can kill a brown bear.

  • haha WOW, no tiger has even reach 800 lbs. let alone 900, the are probably 11.5-12 ft. with the tail included, the only cats that reach that size are ligers and maybe american lions, but ligers dont count, they are not a real species

  • A number of Siberia Tigers that have been caught are over 800lbs and were nearly 3 and a half metres long.. The average size is usually between 550 and 600 lbs but like in any species there are some much larger animals out there.... America Lions are extinct, but they did grow to average sizes of over 800lbs..

  • I know, African lions have been found that size as well, but Bipolar Tiger said the average siberian tiger was that size

  • lion is a great animal...king of africa...but tiger is the best of the best, beautiful and powerfull animal.

  • lion is the king of the jungle tiger is the king of the forest this is gonna be a great battle

  • king of the jungle?

    i think you might wanna go back to studying geography.

    lions dont belong in the jungle lol

    Their main habitat is the savannahs of africa.

    There are a few species of lions that live the jungles tho. Those can be found in Gir Forest area in the state of Gujarat, India

  • Tiger Owns Every species of cat...i don't know about the liger though...

  • thats this ladys opinion lions have no fear of tigers and when put in same park as in everlands park the asiatic lion dominated tigers and in the end killed all tigers a smaller and less agressive lion than the african lion

  • you try taking combat sports like judo, kickboxing, boxing, or muay thai and fight someone who is bigger, and heavier than you. Try that first before saying a lion who is smaller is stronger than a tiger who is much larger and heavier

  • No one says that a lion is more stronger than a tiger, it basically has more fighting experience

    Now you try taking combat sports, and verse someone who has more experience than you

  • they keep saying lions fight more ,and they have more competition in the safari the plains..bull of shit ,,tigers live in jungles,way more dangerous then the safari,,if u put a lion in the jungle it will die 100%,,but tigers are adaptable they can live any where...

  • so Asiatic lions die 100% in India because they don't

  • @MultiBt yep

  • @MultiBt if you put tigers in the Savannah, they will 100% die. hyenas or lions will them off cuz tigers are solitary.

  • lion fans just dont wanna get it..tigers are king of kings...

  • @MultiBt I'm a tiger fan but Lion's did coexist with them at one time and asserted their dominance...history is rich with tales' of this my son.

  • @MultiBt pretty much, but you mean animals not, God.

  • @MultiBt Wow a tiger killing an asiatic lion. Click on the link to the right 42 seconds in black and white. African Lion mauls Tiger, a little disturbing.

  • but the asian lion is more small than african lion

  • hubbala hubbala hubbala hubbala LOOK AT ME IM SMART I TYPE LONG COMMENTS FOR NO REASON hubalabalal hubbalahubbala

  • Most of the time a big male tiger would kill a big male lion, its faster, stronger, bigger, more agile & has a greater ability to stand on hind legs & let loose with both paws.

  • LOL AT THE COMMENT AT THE BOTTOM! LIONS ARE MORE HEAVIER? PFFT. TRY Serbians Tigers. way much heavier than lions. its okay lion fans, the fact is that a tiger will wHOOP a LION ASS!!! Tigers have way more experience than a lion in combat.

  • ...who said lions were heavier?..i said they were the same size, and, records support this. ii also have MANY records of lions killing, or otherwise defeating tigers in a fights....look at my vids, i have actual lion and tiger fights on my page.

  • cavitivity doesn't show nothing. tiger fight often in the wild for food, mating, and terrortory.. while the lion fight 1 to 10 in its life span(other lions). you can't compare a cativity to a wild animal because they act different. they would have less experince and knowledge. it just stupid to compare a cative animal to a wild.

  • ..i`m not comparing captive animals to wild animals. when did you hear me make any such statement?....lions fight more often then tigers, over food, territory, and mating as well. tigers very rarely fight over food, because a tiger which has reached carcass first, usually has priority rights, and another tiger, even if more dominate, must wait his turn, according to studies by george schaller. lions can fight upwards of 20 times in a lifetime, possibly more.

  • tiger fight more.tigers fight often. lion doesn't have the strongest rival. the tiger can take a 4 times it weight. tiger are also more active. swimming also helps the tiger to build muscle and climbing trees. they fight asgainst bear(stronger and smartter than the lion), wolves, tigers ect... lion fight of hyenas and lion.

  • ...learn how to write. and, it is lions, not tigers which fight more often. studies by schaller, as well as mcdougal, and baikov indicate tigers show very little strife, and that restraint and avoidance is the usual behavior. tigers very rarely fight bears..not that they are stronger and smarter than lions. grizzlies average 192 kg, from a sampling of 65 adult males. lions must often face not one, but multiple opponents. a group of lions, or hyenas is more formidable than any the tiger faces.

  • good breakdown! and more than that TRUE!!!

  • jeffinator is right

    and jus making a point

    y do they want to put lions in india tigers are much more endangered we should focus more in putting tigers in africa !!!!!!!

  • ...they are already IN india...those are asiatic lions. they are talking of moving gir lions outside of that range, inot tiger territory, which does not encompass gir. but, that would be a bad idea....i doubt they could live together, peacefully. lions and tigers have a passionate hatred for each other.

  • the tigers agile is advantage against a lion. also tiger have a bigger bite force because there head is wider than a lion.

  • ...tigers are certainly more agile, but they do not have the stronger bite force. lions have the bigger skull, as well as the higher sagittal crest, which would equate to a more powerful bite. it is the lion`s head, not the tiger`s, which is the larger, on average, according to actual records. the tiger`s bite force has never been measured, but a lion`s has been measured at 940 lbs.

  • tiger is known for its strength and power. nation geographic states. the lion skull is more length and a tiger skull is wider. tiger have bigger canines, there bite force os 1000 psi.. there impact is harder than a lion. look up a tiger body impact blow, agile, expert stated both lion and the tiger have 1000 psi bite force.

  • ...a tiger`s bite force has never been measured, only estimated at, but i`ve been told, via email, that there have, and is, attempts being made to measure the bite of a tiger. a tiger`s impact is not greater than a lion`s. and, a lion`s bite force, actually measured, was measured at 940 lbs. the tiger certainly has a proportionately thicker skull, but not overall, according to most records.

  • the tiger is more active than a lion.

  • also a male lion wont have the experience fighting/hunting that a male tiger would... lionesses do almost all the hunting in prides, and male lions only real job is to defend the pride... whereas a male tiger is solitude- it has to defend itself and hunt for itself all the time... and on another note lions ahve the bigger head but tigers have stronger bite presure... just like alligators have a bigger head but crocs have the stronger bite preasure...

  • male lions fight far more frequently than tigers. one of the main reasons lions live in groups, is because is the increased competition they receive, either from rivals such as hyenas, or even other male lions. a tiger`s bite force has never been measured, but an animal with a bigger head and that of the lion is bigger, will usually have the stronger bite. it should be noticed that the lion also has the larger sagittal crest, which equates to a more powerful bite.

  • ...no, the tiger is awake for slightly longer, but not more active.

  • that's mean that is a Lion bite a Man, It will splice the man in Two.

    Oh GOD!!! How could be a Man a Lion Hunter 1 thousand years ago?

    That is a Fearless animal.

  • .....what`s mean?....what are you talking about?...sorry, but i didn`t understand a word of what you were saying...write clearer english.

  • I mean that be a hunter 1 thousand years ago...would be hard.

  • wtf? weres the fight?

  • the conditions of the tiger's population are pretty extreme. tigers too are endangered, but why are the lions in india in a worse situation? because of men, and tigers. u lion fans say that these lions are just asiatic, well put african lions there with those tigers and i tell u the tigers will beat the shit out of them. especially those who've experienced fighting with asiatic lions. PERIOD.

  • Hahahahah you fucking fucked up bitch.. You are making it sound like they believe that tiger will win.. They are talking about tiger lions you bitch.. Which are alot weaker than African Lions.

  • This is obviously fake.. I know National Geographic very well.. And they prefer lions.. They even made an animated fight between a lion and a tiger..

  • There is lions in india to ....almos extinct not by man .... by tigers.

  • I think a tiger is quicker and stronger than a lion. lions also have a reputation of being a bully, only picking on those they know they can beat but often back down from a fight with a tiger.

  • ....tigers are quicker, but they are no stronger, nor are they any heavier. average body mass of wild specimens indicate a figure of equal numbers, at least, in comparing african lions to tigers. asiatic lions are scarcely any smaller, likely as large as tigers of the sundarbans.

  • sure man, broadcast your sources on tv about the weight of these two cats and u'll be the laughing stock on earth

  • ...why would i be the laughing stock, when they are of records which were made by scientists, or other respected sources?.......i have since emailed many experts, including packer, sunquist, frank mendell, and many others....none of which disagreed with my statement.

  • there we go!!! with a 50kg advantage a TIGER COULD KILL A LONE LION!!! thats it end of debate!!!!

  • wot the fuck is the point in relocating the lions when they would not have adapted to that particular habitat???

  • these are asian lions that live on the tip of india, they used to be common through all of india but were fond of cattle and driven to the south, tigers prefer wild prey so were able to stay in there habitat.

  • Well actually there's another theory that lions were driven out by tigers. Its just a theory, but it a theory that also implies that tigers are superior to lions (physically).

    Kenneth Anderson,Richard Perry,Jack Denton Scott,Franklin Russell,Dionne Bunsha,Robin David, all these people have written of the possibility that tigers are the cause of lions no longer inhabiting other parts of India.

  • But of course, man also played its part.

  • do you have all the document????

  • obvious!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more