2 watt solar panel-- Imhotep Radiant Oscillator

[harryfodder]

its im ho tep not im ho teep.  good work!

[fdoca]

We need think outsite the box. This is 21th century, not 372 years ago.

Info exchange cross globe in 2 seond.

"Over unity is over unity why deny it?"

Lidmotor done a supper jobs on youtube that brought this impotant info to the world, He is uniue and one of kind with big heart

Lidmotor , Imhotep and many others will be in the history book

Light up the world, Drop food price from free energy transportation cost is the goal.

[0WildBill0]

Excellent job! Very well explained too. 5 stars!!

Bill

[MoonSpyStudios]

Sweet!!

[jabrinka99]

Sweeeet..

[seshkanuri]

40 Watts CFL? That looks like a 15W CFL.

[Lidmotor]

The CFL I used in this video is rated at: "40watt light output. It uses 9 watts and puts out 500 lumens with an average life of 6000 hours". The way I am using this bulb in the video is in a different way. The internal circuit was removed. It is just an example. The Imhotep Radiant Oscillator will actually light up all kinds of CFL bulbs. Watch some of the other videos by other replicators here on Youtube.

[imaginenoreligion]

It is actually a 40 watt equivalent of a traditional incandescent bulb. It probably uses far less power, about 10 watts. I don't think you are getting 40 watts out.

[Careica]

So you think this is OU? I realy don't know what to say.

[Lidmotor]

No one working on this project is even thinking about over unity. This is about a way to light a flourscent light bulb using a small amount of energy and then recovering part of the energy in a second battery. The brilliant minds that invented this device (Imhotep and Dr. Peter Lindemann) worked hard to make it so simple that people around the globe could replicate it easily and be able to use it. Please visit the Energetic Forum and watch as this unfolds.

[zizuazi]

Maybe we should say hyper efficency and not OU ?

[Lidmotor]

I think that "hyper efficiency" is a good way to describe this. Thanks.

[Drevtoobe]

Careica, if you saw my discussion with our friend Stark you probably read what I said about OU several times:

There are two possibilities for proving OU:

1. Demonstrate and measure more power output (going into a load) than measured power input.

2. Demonstrate and measure more total battery energy at the end of the experiment as compared to the measured total battery energy at the beginning of the experiment.

If you are working on an OU project then either option is valid.

[zizuazi]

When we use atomic bomb we do not pump all the energy in. Actually it use a trigger to start a chain reaction. Maybe in electricity there is something similar. By using coil and electric field, we may trigger some other unknown energy sources. I hope there is unknown science otherwise what is the point of discoveries ?!