what should be banned are shi* planes that DROP PARTS FROM THEM and the ones that had CRASHED MORE THAN ONCE BEFORE because you're afraid it might CRASH again! but I'm not saying to ban planes like the 747's who had gained the public's trust and confidence for their safety by constantly upgrading it's components safety features.
@TonyFirelli Yea,if i were the BA or Air France i would have changed the engines to modern 21st century engines not 1970s engine. That was it's only problem.
what should be banned are shi* planes that DROP PARTS FROM THEM and the ones that had CRASHED MORE THAN ONCE BEFORE because you're afraid it might CRASH again! but I'm not saying to ban planes like the 747's who had gained the public's trust and confidence for their safety by constantly upgrading it's components safety features.
SuperFSPilot 1 year ago
Comment removed
SuperFSPilot 1 year ago
why be mad at concorde it did nothing with the crash it only crashed because of that stupid dc-10 metal...
TonyFirelli 2 years ago 11
@TonyFirelli Yea,if i were the BA or Air France i would have changed the engines to modern 21st century engines not 1970s engine. That was it's only problem.
pereduranofcourse 1 year ago