Added: 2 months ago
From: dcexaminer
Views: 88,397
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (556)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • yay the retard spoke...that kid was there as a plant to make it difficult to ansewer questions...that retard took away from the guy that was ganna ask a serious question...a question that needed to be asked AND RON PAUL WAS GANNA GIVE THE REAL ANSEWER...that son of a bitch kid fucked it all up...keep the retards out of the fucking press room ok? i bet the retard has a fucking job..no not me tho... does he have any idea whats going on in this fucking country? probably fucking not..I DO...vote..RP

  • @scouse7under7blouse7 i hope all the bad things in life happen to you and nobody but you.People like you are a curse to this planet.

  • @scouse7under7blouse7 Could you be any more selfish? This kid can't help that he is autistic, and you are probably perfectly fine and you are taking shots at someone who is disadvantaged. Just because he may not be as smart as you and didn't ask a question you wanted him to doesn't mean you call him a retard. You need be more caring and maybe less of a jerk. Just sayin'

  • The little laughing kid seems to know exactly what's going on in the world.

  • ron paul will probably die if he becomes president, i mean he is 75 years old he will die from old age or something that "would" be likely.

  • @tERtasdf omg stfu.

  • @brunetteDUH u know its true

  • Prove the media WRONG and show those assholes what traitors they really are by ignoring this man! Make em eat cake election day

  • I have a child with Autism, and he just learned to speak a month before turning 4. I think that having a child with Autism ask the question was a good thing, as it hits home harder than having an adult ask instead. If it wasnt for some of the programs in place for my son, he would be worse off. Does everyone need free narcotics because of minor back pain? No... but that is what they care about,selling pills and treatments that can make you worse... Our priorities in care are fucked up, IMHO.

  • Am I the only person who can't hear the whole question?

  • Paul's response was stupid. He didn't say he wanted to help the boy and people with autism, he said that liberty would lead to prosperity? First of all, that has nothing to do with education, and second, his definition of liberty is no government what-so-ever.

  • @ellemondelegrande Wrong! you need to clear the shit out of your ears! The more we get gov out of healthcare, the better, that's why he spoke of liberties, not a gov. controlled healthcare system, that serves the interests of corporate drug companies and hospitals, but in a system were drug companies and healthcare providers would have to compete for customers with better services.

  • @Vegasgodless The government-run health care system does NOT serve corporate interests. That wouldn't make sense, because the government would be taking over the role that the health insurance corporations have right now. Universal health care is working very very well in Europe and Canada, so why couldn't it work here?

    And Competition=demand=increased prices. Under the affordable health care act, it would cost way less, and it would cover basically everything! :D

  • @ellemondelegrande Euro healthcare only seems good from the outside observer but you don't take into account that it drives up the prices of things with taxes.  Btw correction: competition does not equal demand or increased prices. Demand is only created if there's a need.Competition is good because companies will fight to give you quality care and low prices, Obamacare undermines that with mandates. Too much to explain but what works in another country might not work in USA.

  • That baby fucking loves Ron Paul

  • I hate it when parents of "special needs" children pimp their own children so shamelessly. I also hate it when these same parents tell me that their disability is MY problem, and that somehow I "owe them" something. Classic entitlement mentality. I am very generous, but I resent compulsory voluntarism. Oh, and all this makes me a "hater."

  • @PistolPackingPatriot No but if you think everyone feels like helping out you are incredibly stupid. Thats why its easier having people help each other out by duty because well people just dont give a shit. Let someone else handle it.

  • @PennyDreadful1

    I love your attitude! In that case, I could really, really use about $5,000 right now. I demand you provide it immediately. Don't you dare deny me, or I'll call you cruel, selfish and heartless. Besides, my law requires you to give me money. Now do you get it? Of course not.

  • @PistolPackingPatriot Because its not required by law... And I dont give a shit. I dont know you and I rather keep my money.

    Besides are you in need? And if you are than the collected taxes from me and several other taxpayers should be able to help... Its like you didnt even read my comment.

  • @PennyDreadful1 If people don't give a shit, well, then they don't give a shit. This is America, I have a birthright to not give one solitary FUCK about you, your family, or anything else. I understand that people are cruel. They really are. The issue is not the morality of people, though. It's people's RIGHT to be immoral. I'm an American, and if I decide to tell you and your autistic child to promptly fuck off, I have every right to do that, and I shouldn't then have to give you money. PERIOD.

  • @PistolPackingPatriot We aren't asking YOU for anything! Never have and never will. You are already paying for special needs individuals like it or not. FACT! We are asking that a cure or prevention be a priority so that tax payers are not left to the responsibilities. You missed the point completely. Don't think Sam does not know exactly what it is he does. He is well aware. It is his choice to exercise his rights in order to help himself and others. He is trying to HELP!

  • Comment removed

  • huuuur

  • Comment removed

  • R-Tex?  More like T-Rex

  • @kurticus91 Haha thats funny because Dr. Paul is neither tyrannical nor reptilian.

  • @Jeremyhawaii808 lmao, reptillians...it's astounding what camera glitches will make people believe. ah, the imagination....

  • @thatguymike023 did you laugh your ass off about that? Well, an intelligent person would realize I forgot to add that rex means king, and thats what I see in this clip. A king. Tyrannosaurus means tyrant lizard, or reptile. What, troll is this camera glitch you speak of? And who is the believer? And who's imagination are you referring to? Your own, obviously. My advice: don't post comments on youtube, you aren't helping. I read your other remarks, too.

  • Comment removed

  • GET THE KID AWAY FROM THE FUCKING CAMERA, I COULD BARELY HERE WHAT PAUL WAS SAYING...Goddamn, what the fuck are little kids doing at a presidential debate anyway? Too cheap to get a baby sitter or just leave them with a relative? Why even post such a crappy video when you have an obnixious little kid making stupid sounds throughout the entire thing ruining the audio quality?

    Seriously, why would anyone bring a kid who's still too young to control themselves/keep quiet to this type of event? FAIL

  • @thatguymike023 Maybe they want to know what the hell is going on with our country as well. As American citizens I personally feel that kids have the right to see and talk to/ask questions to those who want to run the country they live in.

    They're affected in ways by presidential policies too -- not just adults.

  • @xheather92 Yes, you're right. Children, as well as any American citizen, have the right to become politically involved and ask questions, but I was referring to younger kids, around the age of the kid who's talking over this video (i'm going to guess 3 or 4 years old). My point is I doubt that any kids around that age actually want to sit quietly and listen to a presidential candidates views and ask questions, so if they're only gonna be loud or distracting, simply don't bring them.

  • @thatguymike023 To be honest if he is autistic he will probably just sit around and fiddle with his fingers or something.

  • @PennyDreadful1 You might try and educate yourself about autism rather than come across as totally ignorant!! That would be refreshing and even helpful!! Another person who chooses to be part of the problem rather than the solution!! Sigh........what a world we live in.

  • @PennyDreadful1 I wasn't referring to the kid who asked the question, I was talking about the kid who starts making some annoying noise toward the end of the video.

  • @thatguymike023 its a bunch of autistic kids you dumb fuck obviously they are making noise hahahah

    

  • @wushumon88 Oh really? And how do you figure this? It doesn't say that anywhere in the video discription or in the video itself, so where do you come up with that, you dumb fuck? It was a town hall meeting and the kid who happened to be asking to question in this video was autistic, not everyone else.

  • I LOVE RON PAUL!

  • and as a contrast heres how romney deals with the sick in this nation

    /watch?v=rgbkUID5ms0

  • Comment removed

  • I would die for this man.

  • @TiticacaBang even better. i would fight for this man

  • @TiticacaBang I would die, reincarnate, and die again for this man

  • @TiticacaBang Me too

  • CAPITALISM creates ELITE CRIMINALS. BANKERS. DRUG LORDS. INEQUALITY. INSECURITY. GREED. RUTHLESS COMMUNISM. NWO. NAZI. TERRORISM. LAZY PEOPLE. REBEL POLITICIAN. ANARCHY. worst is WAR etc. etc.. ☠ ☢ ☠ ☢ ☠ ☢ ☠

    CAPITALISM was designed only for CORRUPT OPPORTUNISTIC MANIPULATIVE LAZY POLITICIAN. BANKERS. LAWYERS. DRUG LORDS. JUDGES. CRIMINALS. DICTATORS. RULERS. KING. SULTANATE. EMPEROR etc..

    HARD WORKING PEACE LOVING HAPPY HONEST SOCIETY were always the slave victim and poorly starve to death. :(

  • @TiticacaBang they could fire the secret service. ron paul will have a human shield of dedicated followers around him at all times

  • Humans in general have a tendency to undermine animals and kids with disabilities or gifts depending on the person look at Einstein but any individual can obtain understanding or knowledge to some extent unless brain dead. So when you hear someone speak swallow some pride acknowledge their opinion because perspectives should never be ignored.

  • did you know anything about politics and such at that age? fuck no. nobody did. this is bs

  • Well said, Mr. Paul.

  • The Constitution created a framework for freedom, not a list of automatic benefits to be defined by government.

  • I hate it when people identify individual human beings with what ever name we've created to describe the reason we think they're worse than everyone else.

  • @wikieditspam Nobody else said autism made them worse; you just insinuated that it did. You should be ashamed of yourself.

  • @rwfsmith I'm autistic, AS, and don't put words in my mouth.

  • He takes his time and answers a formulated question. With the respect. that's what I saw.

  • I hate when kids ask questions - its obvious that someone formulated the question for them and is using them as a puppet.  They are so young they don't even understand whats going on.

  • @Huapua No offense. I see where you are coming from. But the children of today are a lot smarter and mature than during our generation. Give credit where credit is due.

  • @Huapua I agree

  • @Huapua You underestimate children. If they are really interested, they can be very knowledgeable and capable of displaying it.

  • @Huapua I would just like to say that I have been giving speeches and asking questions to my local congressmen and school board members since I was in 2nd grade. I would also like to inform you that I wrote all my own questions and speeches. I find it very rude that you would imply that kids aren't intelligent enough to formulate a reasonable question. No, most kids don't understand what is going on BUT some do!

  • @Huapua I resent the idea that kids are completely mindless and can't think about the world in a serious manner, almost as much as I resent the exploitation you think is happening here.

  • @Huapua You have obviously never meat a child with autism. their IQ and understanding of things blows most so called genius adults out of the water. They just do not understand how to interact with people and express their feelings to what would be considered the norm.

  • @fubijar00

    What we're discovering now is that there's an autistic spectrum of "normal" to "rain man", with ADD and aspergers at different points along the way. Autistic kids are often like if you studied ONE THING your entire life- you'd be pretty darn good at it. Plus, there's some new ideas that if the brain functions on a level beyond what it was meant to support, this happens.

  • @fubijar00 I have aspergers, does that mean i am a genius?

  • @Huapua gee..I wonder..do lib's formulate questions....when lib's presidential candidates answer them?...shame..shame on you...another bias lib at heart!

  • @Huapua i do

  • @Huapua I agree. The kid was reading off of a sheet the entire time and had trouble pronouncing the words. At least he wasn't saying something that's really biased Republican or Democrat. That would just be wrong.

  • @Huapua Amen brother.

  • @Huapua Teaching a child about the congressional process and as their rights and responsibilities as citizens is admirable. This child has been taught from a very young age about those things. He understands fully what it is he does. He does so with pride. He knows he is HELPING others similar to himself, who are not able to do what he does. Don't make presumptions or assumptions. Thanks! We appreciate an open mind every bit as much as an open heart!! Be part of the solution!!

  • @Huapua Not true. This young man is well aware that he is helping others like himself as well as less fortunate than he.

  • @Huapua Please don't speculate, presume or assume. It serves to aide no one as you have no firsthand knowledge.

  • How many people (when drinking water) grit their teeth so the flouride can be effective? none of us.... we all open our gullets and pour it down the back of our throats. Making Flouridation USELESS

  • @ORACLE063 flouride lowers IQ so its not only useless like u say, its bad. i just googled some studies, its true flouride without a doubt lowers ur IQ

  • Liberty is the most important thing we can achieve as a Nation.

  • I am so honored to see this film. To witness Dr. Ron move closer to the person asking the question. Such respect. How can you not follow this man!

  • @macrossmatrix For sure. He keeps his focus to the person that asked the question.

    Thats What we need someone with class and respect.

  • @macrossmatrix "How can you not follow this man!"

    Well, liberals simply disagree with everything he says, which I respect. I don't agree with them, but they have a right to their opinion.

    But when conservatives oppose him, it enrages me. They're opposed to him because HE'S INTERNALLY CONSISTENT, unlike the rest of the Republican candidates.

  • @apickle Not all liberals disagree with him. Infact, I know a lot of liberals who have moved on from Obama and found Ron Paul as the most sensible candidate. I'm one of them.

  • @Twin34KP DITTO!!!

  • @macrossmatrix He moved closer so he can hear better. Lol.

  • Just look at the effect his presence has on the room. These people are genuine Americans, and so is Ron Paul. SPREAD THE WORD. SPREAD THE TRUTH. Go Ron!

  • Ron Paul is the only candidate that isnt a Zionist or Nazi as you can see the two fascist arms are working in tandem now......like a giant beast loose on the world.....Romscum is just a Banker thief

  • Ron Paul is awesome!

  • who the fuck is laughing? what an asshole

  • @broadcastmyass4u I'm pretty sure it's a baby/toddler. It doesn't matter that Ron Paul is pure condensed awesomeness...babies just aren't into politics.

  • @broadcastmyass4u come on! have you never heard a baby laugh?

  • What will it take? Have we still not learned? Do we still believe, after all this time and all these lies, is it at all possible we still believe the media? So then why is Ron Paul getting so much press in the media and the rioting in China over Civil Rights violations getting so little? If Ron Paul was a danger to the system, a danger to the powers that be, do you really think he would be getting so much attention? Wake Up! Even Brittany Spears knows... Oooops They did it again.

  • An honorable man.

    Ron Paul, 2012!

  • this boy doesn't "have" autism.

    he was diagnosed as somewhere within the ASD (autism spectrum disorders)

    they have the same life span as everyone else. therefore it is not a disease nor an illness.

    since there aren't accurate, reliable, objective tests to determine it, you can't "have" autism like you can "have" cancer.

    please treat it for what it is... someone that just isn't like everyone else.

    i mean, hell... GWBush and Rick Perry are retarded... they did pretty will in some respects.

  • Can someone quote what the child said? 

  • I am a high functioning Autistic(Aspergers), and in my time meeting with others and those involved with it(people like my mother who are very active and sort of have a community of fellow parents and the 'afflicted' like myself), I've realized that general charity and private groups invest(or used to in the case of general healthcare) way more into most parts of our health and wellness in society than Government does with it's 'tax appropriations'. Charity is stronger than our government...

  • @DontRepYourCity You're what is wrong with this country. Why do you want Obama? If you can list a few reasons i'll respect your opinion, but if you can't then you're the ignorant scum which is pushing us into the dark ages.

  • @imkaneforever I'll list a few reasons why I prefer Barack Obama. Unlike Ron Paul, Obama will not eliminate the EPA. He won't eliminate social security for the elderly. He won't repeal DADT, like Paul wants to do. He won't privatize the department of education. He promised to end the Afghan War in his 2nd term. He won't eliminate safety nets for poor folks, like Paul will. And he wants to make the tax rates between the rich and poor more balanced, unlike Paul.

    Any more questions?

  • @DontRepYourCity What do you like about the EPA? It's been lobbyied and is pushes out any legislation which is favored by corporations. Ron Paul won't eliminate social security for the elderly, he'll allow people to opt out and pay for it with money saved from the wars. Obama repealed DADT, where have you been? DADT is bad... Sure looks like it with us bombing the shit out of the middle east... taxes are bad, why use force to make people pay them?

  • @imkaneforever EPA sets safety regulations for our air, water, and the food that we eat. Without it, we'd be eating spoiled food & drinking polluted water. Can you honestly say you would be cool with that?

    Yes, Obama did repeal DADT. That's what I said. & he said he would end the Afghan war in his 2nd term. The Iraq war is over.

    Also, I agree--nobody likes taxes. But everyone has to pay in order for things to be did like road repair & construction. That stuff isn't free.

  • @DontRepYourCity But we were fine pre-1970's before it was founded. Yes, I can honestly say. I pay for my water, I receive water reports of whats in it weekly. Why do I need a federal agency to 'ensure' my safe water when I can investigate myself? Iraq was is over because it went along with Bush's timeline, and obama wanted to stay in longer, but Iraq voted us out.

  • @DontRepYourCity you also realize sir, that the money collected by this country for taxes GOES DIRECTLY INTO THE POCKETS OF THE MEN WHO OWN THE PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE... you need to learn economics apparently, its quite simple really if you just pay attention, and avoid obvious fraudulent systems... nonetheless... your very confused about how our government works, ESPECIALLY WHERE IT GETS ITS MONEY FROM, AND HOW IT SPENDS IT... learn these two things, and surely it WILL change

  • @DontRepYourCity your life forever, thats a promise, YOU DONT REALIZE THIS COUNTRY SPENDS WAY WAY WAY MORE THAN THEY COULD EVER DREAM OF TAXING HENCE WHY THEY BORROW, OUR OWN money, from the fraudulent federal reserve, a central bank THE MONEY COLLECTED FROM US IN TAXES GOES TO PAY THE INTEREST INCURRED ON SAID DEBT, the problem being, ITS OUR MONEY, THEY ARE LENDING OUR OWN MONEY TO US, AND CHARGING US INTEREST, if we would listen to OUR CONSTITUTION we would be out of this...

  • @DontRepYourCity heres a safety net for poor folks, lets STOP DESTROYING OUR CURRENCY SO THEY ARENT HIT WITH THE INVISIBLE TAX OF INFLATION, obama works for wall st, and the federal reserve HE IS INCAPABLE OF DOING THE RIGHT THING FOR THIS COUNTRY, WE ARE GROWING OPIUM IN AFGHANISTAN, WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE, the dept. of ed, is unneccessary and an indoctrination camp training center, the EPA has allowed unbelievably atrocious things like THE POISONING

  • @DontRepYourCity of this COUNTRIES ENTIRE WATER SUPPLY WITH FLUORIDE, you my friend are braindamaged, probly because your ingesting these poisons like aspartame and fluoride on a constant basis, nonetheless if you want "fabian socialism" go to england, THIS IS A REPUBLIC, THAT CHERISHES PERSONAL LIBERTY AND FREEDOM, YOUR SOCIALISTIC VEIWS ARE THE ANTITHESIS TO WHAT AMERICA STANDS FOR, so i must ask, WHY ARE YOU HERE?

  • @libertyordeath21 the human body has lots of the element flourine in it. aspartame is just 2 ESSENTIAL amino acids... that's it. the average diet contains MANY MANY thousands of times more of both of these acids every day than in a DOZEN packets of sweetener (far more than most ppl use). FYI: Essential meaning your body can't MAKE them, so you HAVE to get it from your diet.

    if you have proof otherwise, i will gladly read it.

    thank you and have a good day sir or madam.

  • @AssistingHealth watch my video, "america and her insidiously poisoned society" read scientific books on the subject, i could fill up ten of these tiny little comment boxes with how wrong you are, but i doubt youd read them... so

  • @libertyordeath21 I'm about 15 minutes in so far, and, so far not one study actually has a study that doesn't have literally thousands of confounding variables.

    like, how the "higher cancer rates" (10%... which isn't much. so say 150 people versus 165 people... just a lack of exercise and healthy diet ALONE would likely contribute to MORE than 10% of that... which obviously wasn't taken into account)

    so far, all I see is rhetoric... methodology of experiments are VERY important...

  • @AssistingHealth if your talking about my movie, i do like 10 to 20 min. intros before the whole deal, so its just clips, showing the content, then you get the entire interveiws and te docs... nonetheless, why does one get attacked for asking questions? do you really think i dont know 1 ppm is a ridiculously small amount?? and neither does aspartame, it breaks down like methyll alcohal

  • @libertyordeath21 1 PPM is a super ridiculous small amount... of ANYTHING. period.

    no matter what it is... every human body already has florine in it (FL is flourine and it's an ELEMENT... meaning, it's ONE ATOM. not some HUGE complicated molecule like a pharmaceutical) and flouride is still a small molecule.

    and why pick on aspartame instead of sucralose which is FAR more potent, and DOESN'T DEGRADE as it's metabolized... meaning, it doesn't get broken down like aspartame does.

  • @AssistingHealth Is fluoride a good thing to have in our water and toothpaste? Watch = Dr paul connett

  • @vic4rp dont even try man, i showed that guy Dr. paul connett, he ignored the facts... and then he disliked my upload, lmao he was a sore loser

  • Comment removed

  • @libertyordeath21 it's likely that, maybe... say aspartame drops lifespan by 1%... why not work on something FIRST like heart-disease due to a sedentary lifestyle and lack of healthy diet... FAR more likely to kill you 30 years younger than normal.

  • @libertyordeath21 for instance, alex jones calls it "defecation"... well, he's using a "buzzword" to demonize something. POLITICIANS DO THAT, not scientists. the bacteria PRODUCES drugs with ENZYMES and the expells them from it's cell body.

  • @libertyordeath21 "do you think he put the public at risk?" "yes I do"

    is VERY dramatic... yet, not conclusive.

    did you know that nicotine is in potatoes? but nicotine is bad for you! no, inhaling smoke right off of a FLAMING STICK (cigarette) with TONS of other chemicals is "bad for you".

    nicotine has been shown in double-blind, placebo-controlled study to improve cognition with little or no shown negative side-effects versus placebo.

  • @libertyordeath21 what that means is, people were given a relatively benign substance and some given some nicotine. the ones with nicotine performed better on some memory tests... their blood, urine, et al was then collected and no KNOWN NEGATIVE side-effects were noted in the nicotine group.

    again, most of this is rhetoric like people saying "it's not true" or "these studies are just WRONG!"

  • @AssistingHealth I KNOW WHAT A FUCKING PLACEBO IS BRO... stop talking to me like im some fool, and again for the 50th time, the beginning is introductory, how do you criticize 2 mins into a 2 hour movie? come on bro...

  • @libertyordeath21 most of this is just BODLY STATED opinion... sometimes it doesn't even make sense...

    like when the one woman said "aspartame is one of the most highly-studied food-additives in history"

    then cuts off... it didn't even show what the conclusions were or her interpretation thereof! it just stopped, right there!

  • @AssistingHealth ha, im seriously not gonna explain this again man... its a 2+hour movie, it will get back to that woman, i promise you lmao, this is sad... are you scared of information, that may go against the very fabric of what you have been taught? aww... im sorry, we all have to go through it sometimes... and lastly, just know, i hope im wrong, trust me, if im not YOUR government is OPENLY murdering people... lol

  • @libertyordeath21 also, i have read every single one of your comments... i think the "i doubt you read them" is psychological projection that you aren't reading MY responses!

  • @libertyordeath21 again, "pollutant" is just silly... it's more accurate to say "the most significant constituant of the exhaust of industrial facilities.

  • @libertyordeath21 ha, i assume you didnt get past the introduction, sweet, well ONE QUICK question have you HEARD OF CODEX ALIMENTARIUS? look it up, if you wanted proof, there it is THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS SIR... enough said... have a great day sir/ madame

  • @AssistingHealth and again, if youd prefer to not see news clips and scientists explaining the problem with aspartame, and other excito-toxins, that you CLAIM are good for us, even if that was so, not at the levels we get in our food, how do you explain the FDA's report in the p-90's that stated their was over 92 NEGATIVE KNOWN SIDE EFFECTS TO aspartame ingestion, INCLUDING CANCER, pancreatic cancer to be specific, a 95+ percent mortality rate with that one... oh but thats ok???

  • @libertyordeath21 i doubt the validity of every single one of those claims. if i give a 95 year old man with cancer aspartame, and his cancer worsens how do you know it was the aspartame and it wasn't going to happen anyways? this is known in the scientific community as "confusing correlation with causation".

    i don't claim things are "good" for you because that is an ambiguous statement. YOU said that, not me.

  • @AssistingHealth when DID I EVER SAY ANYTHING ABOUT A 95 YO MAN, WHO ALREADY HAD CANCER, lmao, you just arbitrarily make up a story to prove a point, that proves no point what so ever, i mean, did you send that to the right person, I SAID THE FDA HAS A LIST OF 92 SIDE EFFECTS, ITS ON THEIR OWN WEBSITE BRO, so before you "doubt the validity" how about you read what the FDA has said, how about what scientists have said, try acclaimed Neurosurgeon, russel blaylock

  • @libertyordeath21 no, you didn't say anything about a 95 year old man that already had cancer... I did. Yes, I used a hypothetical situation to prove the CONCEPTUAL basis of my claim(s); however, it was quite deliberate and in NO WAY arbitrary.

    As far as that goes, ANYTHING that happens after something is administered must be listed as a "potential side effect" BY LAW.

    a potential side effect doesn't imply nor does it state causation or likelihood of occurrence.

  • @AssistingHealth and it was in every way arbitrary, for it ABSOLUTELY DID NOT even come close to proving your point, it was totally irrelevant... and a joke, nonetheless it ignores my suggestions, and you said yourself youd be glad to read proof, if i could get it, im GIVING YOU EVIDENCE, PROOF IS OVERATED, AND ENDS UP BEING ONES OPINION VS THE OTHER, but if you could be INFORMED on the subject, you could at the very least HAVE AN ACTUAL CONVO. as opposed to spewing propaganda..

  • @libertyordeath21 and like I said... you are attempting to make SCIENTIFIC claims and the SCIENTIFIC method doesn't care much for the rhetoric of a neurosurgeon... maybe YOU do, or people that you KNOW do... but that's subjective, not objective. Science is OBJECTIVE.

    the STUDIES are what matters, not mere statements made by people. language doesn't alter reality, I promise.

  • @AssistingHealth so, according to you, an "assertion" that this is safe, is NOT rhetoric as well? your as well are being subjective, friend, just on the opposite side of the fence... these acclaimed neurosurgeons, ABSOLUTELY are not "subjective" but in fact conducting experiments and making said exp. public, you AGAIN OBVIOUSLY HAVE NOT looked into this, AS YOU SO BOLDLY CLAIMED YOU WOULD, when presented with the info, you disregard science, for your OPINION, WHILST CLAIMING

  • @AssistingHealth that this is what i did? thats laughable, you think your so intelligent, with big words, that we all understand, and i have proven to be in this conversation for the long haul, so instead why not, surprise us all, and actually do something intelligent, LOOK INTO MY SUGGESTIONS, and instead of writing them off as baseless or the rhetoric of a "crazed" scientist, do what your beloved science says, BE OBJECTIONABLE, DONT HAVE PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS!

  • @libertyordeath21 it would be VERY easy to find a centenarian that has consumed aspartame MORE than the norm and it shuts down the ENTIRE "bad for you" claim. all it takes is ONE TIME.

    just like gravity... all it takes is ONE time for you to drop an apple and have it fall upwards to necessitate a re-evaluation of the situation (the mechanisms of gravity and it's corresponding formulae once other possibly confounding variables are removed [like a hidden air jet that may have shot it upwards]).

  • @libertyordeath21 wait, when did I say that you made a claim about a 95 y/o man? I never said that you said that.... what is going on?

    you would likely benefit GREATLY from some critical-thinking skills development. I'm being quite serious... it would likely transform your whole world-view leading to some very desirable outcomes...

  • @AssistingHealth i have benifitted GREATLY from critical-thinking skills, how is this an intelligent approach to this debate, now your gonna start trying to suggest im stupid? or lacking "critical-thinking" skills? come on man, how did this get from what i thought was a scientific subject, to that? nonetheless their are lots of great movies on this subject, and surely lots opposing my suggestions, i dont care which one you watch, it is of no consequence to me

  • @AssistingHealth thats funny, cause i think i ACTUALLY SAID IT WAS BAD, but ok... did you not say you would read proof? yet you clearly didnt, i even gave you an option to WATCH PROOF, you still are opposed to even LOOKING AT IT? or are you just SCARED? dont wanna be wrong?

  • @libertyordeath21 again, I said that I DIDN'T SAY it was good, because I don't use ambiguous terms like "good" and "bad" because they're so difficult to define and mean different things to different people.

    Although I admit, I did make a mistake by not watching your video... you did say that. I will watch your video, then comment within said video (that's what you wanted from the beginning anyways, right? more comments and views =] )

  • @AssistingHealth not even... ha cause veiws and comments make my world go around... no actually i was or thought we were having a conversation, nonetheless I DIDNT SAY IT WAS GOOD EITHER, i said there is STAUNCH EVIDENCE that suggests its quite unhealthy, and my biggest concern not mentioned because the space is so limited here, is the effect said chemicals have on the brain, especially in a developing child, and whether you said it or not, THEY SELL ASPARTAME AS BEING GOOD...

  • @libertyordeath21 i fear no information, sir. i WANT to be wrong because that's how science works. scientists LIKE to be wrong... it's how progress is made. it's how you learn.

  • @AssistingHealth and trust me i love being wrong, cause then i learn more... BUT I DONT LIKE BEING TALKED DOWN TO, LIKE YOU have been doing here, i dont like being patronized... i cant see why i cant have a decent conversation, without it being an argument, debates, in my opinion are beautiful, as long as both parties are respectful, and come with legit info... and CLEARLY AN OPEN MIND... which the latter i believe you would help your self out a ton, if youd just open it up...

  • @libertyordeath21 were ANY of these studies with normal, healthy, volunteering adults? how long were they tracked? how do you know they weren't going to get these cancers ANYWAYS?

    instead of making assertions and pretending it's gospel, please... cite your references. also, science is EMPIRICAL, so it has to be REPEATABLE with CONSISTENT results.

    also, bias is best to avoid; and, is unfortunately common in capitalist societies... if screwing the numbers is profitable, they often will do so.

  • @AssistingHealth i assure you most of the studies on aspartame were done with monkeys bro... and probly rats and other creatures, obviously the primates would be the most relevant, in relation to humans... if you watch that movie, youll get descriptions on how, most studies were conducted... and i never made an assertion, in fact i suggested there was evidence contrary to what you had claimed... and that i would show you the 'EVIDENCE" again proof is baseless, and a distraction

  • @AssistingHealth i try my hardest not to deal in absolutes... i try my hardest to contain my ego, i do my best to obtain truths, as hard as they may be, and as uncomfortable as they may be to promote... it must be done, again i did not say without a shadow of a doubt that all this did all that, i said their is evidence that is mostly ignored by the mainstream that this causes known side effects... more importantly, that it harms and confuses the brain...

  • @libertyordeath21 also, these tend to be exito-toxins EN VITRO (in a test-tube... as in, a test NOT done on a real person ingesting said substance) and EN VIVO (actually in the creature) hasn't been studied in humans... things that are toxic to rats and other primates often don't have the same affect when done to humans because of DRAMATICALLY different: metabolisms, body chemistry, body size, et al.

    I might do a blog post on this... just for you! :D

  • @libertyordeath21 science operates on the IGNORANCE of authorities, not the accuracy... that's how progress is made! science is about progress and learning, and, you are purporting to make SCIENTIFICALLY-BACKED statements... but saying "the problem with" is begging the question... that means you decide what your results will prove before you get them, then, structure the data and your interpretation thereof to back up your conclusion that you already had to begin with.

    that's not science friend

  • @libertyordeath21 pefect example of correlation with causation confusion.

    Johnny: "when it rains, i see people using lots of umbrellas. when it's dry, i see almost none at all! therefore, people using umbrellas causes rain!"

    is Johnny's statement likely a true one? his research back his correlative conclusion, no?

    (this is obviously wrong... yet it's almost EXACTLY what you are doing from a conceptual stand-point, so it seems.)

  • @libertyordeath21 remember... the FDA is a GOVERNMENT body, not a scientific institution....

    that's where most people make their mistakes. they EMPLOY scientists... but they have shown in the past to have EXTREME biases.

    science is basically the antithesis of monetary bias (lobbying, bribes, et al)