Added: 3 years ago
From: ModernMafia08
Views: 25,897
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (850)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • And how did you come to that conclusion that there is " no evidence of conflicts of interest with the current independent auditors" And those that picked them?? You have that conclusion yet didnt answer my questions and made excuses

  • @rogueronin82

    You have not provided any evidence that there are conflicts.

  • @RetSquid You are the one defending the fed. You are the one that said they were "audited by independent sources" i said there was a bill supported by members of the house and senate calling for a law to be passed requiring the fed to be audited I asked you Several times "how do you know there are no conflicts of interest with the auditors and those hand picking them?" The fed hires its OWN auditors and red flags dont go up? And all you do is duck ,dodge and spin the questions??

  • @rogueronin82

    You are the one claiming that is is not independent, you must provide evidence of that claim. I am stating what the Fed posts on their site, I don't claim any special knowlege (like you are) that they are or aren't independent, you do make such a claim. It is up to you to prove it.

  • @RetSquid That's right keep lying and spinning it and spewing red herrings, Goverment spook.. Youre a disinfo artist and you wont answer the questions.... plain and simple. you have been caught and youre trying to spin lie your way out of it.. anyone can see that when they follow the posts..The fed hires its OWN auditors yet members of congress and the senate and many experts and citizens want the fed audited anyway and youre on here calling us names?? youre nothing but a disinfo artist

  • @rogueronin82

    Go read the Fed's website and find out how the choose their auditors.

  • @RetSquid  ....LOL!!

  • @rogueronin82

    Ditto.

  • @RetSquid ..........

  • @rogueronin82

    That is your most intelligent comment yet.

  • @RetSquid .........

  • @rogueronin82

    Repeating yourself?

  • @RetSquid ..........

  • @rogueronin82

    Time to whip out the SPAM stamp.

  • @RetSquid Yawwwwnnnn.

  • paperwork, democratism, communism, common law, country, countries, affidavits, uniform commercial code, oaths, jurisdiction, constitution, bill of rights, blacks law dict, legality, inalienable/unalienable, freeman, human, civil, criminal, sovereign, acts, statutes, national, international treaties, legislation, etc, r they not all hearsay, fictitious & ambiguous?, isn't it just a meeting of the minds?.type in imbatman57 in youtube & talkshoe.com.

  • Reading all these comments, its no surprise that so few have so much. None of you people can put your own petty issues aside to work together to break the machine.

  • @DaveBleicher

    I know it has nothing to do with the IRS or the laws that say you must pay income tax.  Let me know when you get a logical argument about income taxes

  • Comment removed

  • The REAL controllers of the IRS, $10 TRILLION missing...... watch?v=cJqM2tFOxLQ

  • @DaveBleicher

    The Fed has nothing to do with the IRS.

  • @RetSquid Go watch your Fox or CNN and leave the truth to the big boys who can handle it. The Fed controls EVERYTHING

  • @DaveBleicher

    You need to stop sniffing glue.

  • watch?v=AcdNCz_7Qo0&feature=re­lated

  • @DaveBleicher

    "Underworld Awakening"?

  • Codes or statutes, they have to comply with the constitution

  • "We live in a totalitarian country today."

  • @retsquid I believe there is something fishy going on. Otherwise, IRS, would just say to everyone "ok douches, here is the law, read it, blah, blah" Instead they just do a hat dance while stepping all over the hat!

  • @prof5string We are talking about two different things. I realize the code says that, but it's not a LAW, correct? If it isn't a law, why doesn't congress make it a law???

  • @FreeBlago1

    Congress passes probably dozens of laws each session that change Title 26, if they had to re-pass the entire title with every small change it would be ridiculous. They just pass each change and everything in Title 26 stays positive law, even if the title itself is not positive law.

  • Aaron Russo was a smart, brave man. He should have been President. He or someone like him, could never be president, because an honest man with character, cannot be bought. R.I.P. Aaron, you have reached a lot of people. America is being killed right before our eyes. God help us.

  • @retsquid Do you have a link to the law so that I can read where it is law that I file a return? I am not a hyper tax protester or anything like that. I havent' filed in years and if there is no law, why would I do it? Why needlessly subject myself to imprisonment? If I have to do it, I will, no biggie. No law? No file, simple.

  • @FreeBlago1 Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on taxable income. Section 6012 says that anyone with gross income above a certain amount must file a return. Section 6151 says that anyone required to file a return SHALL PAY the tax. It's really that simple.

  • @prof5string They are codes not laws. If you consent to their terms however you have contracted with them which does have the force of law behind it.

  • @Namaste1001

    Sorry, Codes ARE law, no contract needed.

    “Indeed, as we have repeatedly held, the entire Internal Revenue Code was validly enacted by Congress and is fully enforceable.”

    United States v. McDonald

  • @RetSquid - Laws are Laws. Codes are policies. Congress is fully bought and paid for. If you think anything they pass is legitimate just because they pass it you are deluding yourself.

  • @Namaste1001

    Incorrect, codes are laws, statutes are also laws. Whatever Congress passes and the President signs is law and is, by definition, 'legitimate'.

  • @RetSquid Incorrect. Statutes, acts and codes only have the force of law when consented to by the governed. They are not laws in themselves but policies, and policies are nothing more than contracts.The gov can't force, it has to be done consensually otherwise it would be a Dictatorship. But if it makes you feel better keep on believing in your fairytale.

  • @Namaste1001

    Sorry, you are wrong. If you were correct, then no criminal would consent to any law, would they?

    You give your 'consent' by continuing to live where those laws/statutes/codes have force.

    Should I post the 'Schoolhouse Rock' video for you?

  • @RetSquid Wrong. If they are criminals then they have broken a real Law. Not some invented policy. Your circular logic makes no sense.

    Living on a land mass does not subscribe you to some set of made up rules. Laws yes, but policies no. You don't seem to understand the difference between the two. Just ask the Native Indians.

  • @Namaste1001

    So, you have your LAWs and laws? Get a grip, laws are not policies, otherwise they would be called 'policies'. Indians are not subject to the same laws...because Congress passed LAWS that said they weren't subject to them! Now THAT is circular logic.

    You should look up "jurisdiction", because "living on a land mass" DOES make you subject to laws/statutes/codes.

  • @Namaste1001 Don't waste your time arguing with this idiot. He and another idiot spend every day arguing with people on the videos about the truth about taxes. They either work for the IRS or they kiss IRS ass. IRS code is for people who follow the system. That doesn't make it law. This guy and the other one comb YT looking for people to argue with. It's called having no life

  • @DaveBleicher - He spends most of his days playing video games and it shows. Just look at his channel. He doesn't seem to understand the difference between Real Laws and Legislation. More importantly he doesn't want to and so attacks others to make himself feel better about living in ignorance.

  • @Namaste1001

    Legislation is law, where did you ever get the idea it wasn't? I'm open to the truth, so far, you have not posted any.

  • @RetSquid - Evidently you are only open to that which confirms your existing beliefs. You would be correct if you said Legislation has the force of Law. But it is not Law in itself. They are policies. What do you do if you take out a policy with a company? It's the same principle. The policy becomes a legally binding contract once all parties involved have agreed upon the terms and conditions. Only then does it have the force of Law.

  • @Namaste1001

    I am open to truth, unfortunately you are just posting your opinions, nothing factual.

    Legislation, after being passed and signed by the President, becomes Law. and is posted in the Statutes At Large. It is not a 'policy', it is a binding law.

  • @RetSquid You're not listening. I have read case law that proves what I'm saying. You don't want the truth. You just like stirring things up and I know that because you wrote words to that effect on your channel.

  • @Namaste1001

    Well, if you have read cases that prove your points, cite them! If playing 'whack a mole' with liars is 'stirring things up', then yes, I do like it. But I can only play if you post lies.

  • @Namaste1001 LOL, I just scrolled lower and the other idiot was right there....prof5string. These idiots must do this for a living or something. They kiss IRS ass, or better put, they kiss Fed ass. They're controlled puppets who have no brains of their own

  • @DaveBleicher

    You need to get a life and stop posting meaningless ad hominem attacks.

    How about you prove anything I have said about income tax wrong? You can't do that simple thing, can you?

  • @RetSquid Sorry, was in a bad mood last night. But, I do find it rather strange that you defend the IRS. I say code is very different from law. The Marines follow code, but has nothing to do with the public. It's voluntary when you join an organization. If you get yourself a SS#, you are committing yourself to pay SS taxes. It's voluntary. Some people never have SS#'s, and don't pay SS taxes. So called income taxes go to funding war anyway. It's nothing but a big scam

  • @DaveBleicher

    I don't really 'defend' the IRS I 'defend' the fact that the IRS and the income tax are lawful, legal and constitutional. You are required to have a SS# if you work at any job. It has nothing to do with paying taxes, besides being an identifying number. Income taxes are not voluntary, you have to pay them.

  • @RetSquid Stop sending me messages. I don't like you. You are wrong. While employers will insist that you must have a SS# to work for them, it's unlawful and you can sue them for not discriminating against you for that. I have nothing further to say to you. You and I simply disagree. Have a nice life

  • @DaveBleicher

    I'm not sending you any messages, I'm posting on a video. You will not win any lawsuit against an employer for using a SS#. 26 U.S.C. § 6109(a)(3) & (d), require employers to provide the social security numbers of their employees. So if you are working without a SS# you are violating the law.

    Have nice day, don't bother to respond with more lies.

  • @RetSquid You are a DICK and a LOSER ass kisser. Go back to your video games, twirp

  • @DaveBleicher

    You just can't stop lying, can you? Stop calling names and grow up!

  • @RetSquid Look who's telling who to grow up. You accuse people of lying. I simply said we disagree and left it at that. But, you had to push it and say I'm lying. You know NOTHING about the law. You're a scared, little video game player who needs to insist that the sky is always blue to be able to sleep at night. Well, I feel sorry for you. And, I really don't care what you say or believe. It means nothing to me. Your level of knowledge on this stuff is at level ZERO

  • @DaveBleicher

    Here are your lies:

    Taht I am a "dick and a loser", that using a SS# is discrimnation, that you can sue your employer for that, that I don't know the law (you haven't presented any evidence about any laws yet) and finally that this means nothing to you, if it didn't, you wouldn't be here.

  • @RetSquid Lies? lol Forget the dick & loser. Wasted my energy on someone not worth acknowledging. Why I"m here? To help teach good people (not you) the truth. The REAL lies come from the square thing in your living room, the TV. Mainstream media is nothing but lies. The whole political system is nothing but lies, bought and paid for by the Fed - the central bankers. Go do your homework before you mess with the big boys. I've studied investigative journalism. You haven't

  • @DaveBleicher

    BLah, BLAh,BLAh...whine about something totally non-related to this video.

  • @RetSquid Missed this one. Totally "UNRELATED" is the correct word. Your arguments have gotten so weak. That's because you're so uneducated. Blah, blah, blah......lol

  • @DaveBleicher

    Should I give the Honor Roll and Dean's List awards back to the University? Let me know when you get an argument.

  • @RetSquid You're not only displaying your arrogance, but also your lack of knowledge. The Fed consists of the most powerful people on the planet. They control the CIA, the IRS (by the way, your income taxes go to funding wars they create), & virtually every other agency you can think of. They are worth many, many TRILLIONS. Start studying the Rockefellers, the Morgans, the Warburgs, The Lehmans, The Schiffs, Kuhn Loeb, the Lazards. THEN, come talk to me. THEY control the planet

  • @RetSquid The fed is not accountable to anyone but those that own it. the fed reserve's books need to be inpsected.. the fed the fed needs to be and will be shut down, no matter what you say.. more that ha;f of productive people's income go to some kind of tax,permit or license.. the criminals in the goverment need more money??? They just create a new tax, license or permit,etc. And the stupid sheep dont care.

  • @rogueronin82

    The Fed is audited every year. The Federal Income tax has nothing to do with the Fed.

  • @RetSquid Agin, the fed is audited by whom? 

  • @rogueronin82

    By various independent auditors. You can see the results on the Fed's homepage.

  • @RetSquid various independent auditors hand picked by whom?? And whom do these people picking the auditors connected to???? Various hand pick auditors owned by whom?? and who are those owner's connected to?

  • @rogueronin82

    You must have missed the day they explained "independent" in school.

  • @RetSquid in other words this is your way of refusing to answer those questions... Becuase you know it will reveal that in the end, through all of those so called " various independent auditors" fed reserve is only auditing itself.. Nothing criminal will be revealed.. it is a scam.

  • @rogueronin82

    No, I'm just not going to waste my time looking up the history of all the auditors, you can if you can't to. Why don't you prove that they are NOT independent auditors?

  • @RetSquid I just did prove that they are not auditors.... By you ducking and dodging the questions and making excuses.... then giving me some bullsh-t about "not wasting your time," when you have been hounding everyone you can on youtube complaining about the corrupt goverment and courts, spewing codes and laws made by those same corrupt criminal scum every chance you get..

  • @rogueronin82

    No, you didn't. You just went off on a tangent. Show me who the current auditor is and how they are not independent.

  • @RetSquid And im still proving it... By YOU telling me TO prove what you claimed: that the auditors are" independent," but yet refused to prove how they are independent.. Wont say who is hand picking these auditors and who those that are doing the hand picking of the so called independent auditors are associated with....Even everyone that supported that bill to force the fed to open its books realize it a sham.. the crooked scum blocked it..

  • @rogueronin82

    You are the one claiming that those auditors are NOT independent and are hand-picked...you have to prove that point. Whatever proof I would provided, you would not accept because 'they' are all part of the conspiracy anyways, right?

  • @RetSquid You keep dodging the questions..Even those in congress and the senate suspect the fed of wrong doing, even criminal activity.. that is why they supported a bill forcing the fed to open their books until criminal insiders blocked it...

    How are these "independent "auditors chosen? who made sure there are no conflicts of interest? who did the choosing and how do they not have any conflicts of interest? Who picked them to choose and how is know there is no conflict of interest there?

  • @rogueronin82

    Yes, those are all questions YOU need to answer, YOU are the one claiming that the statements on the FED's webpage are wrong, now you have to back up your claim. I am stating what is on the website, you need to prove the original claim by the Fed is wrong.

  • @RetSquid LOL!! You state what is on a webpage of the fed reserve (suspected by members of the house and senate of wrong doing and possible criminal activity,those same members signed on to a bill forcing the fed to open its books to congress) and imply that everything is above board and you want ME to prove what you implied is not true rather answer my questions you keep comming up with ways to duck and dodge those questions... you said they were indepedently audited..answer those questions

  • @rogueronin82

    You ARE the one making the claim against the Fed, you need to prove your accusations.

  • @RetSquid Didnt you say the fed was independently audited after i said the fed needed to be audited?? So prove they are independent.Show there are no conflicts of interests with the independent auditors or those who hand picked them and those that choose those that did the hand picking and all the way up..Who did that and how did they prove to the public, the house and senate there were no conficts of interest??(they didnt prove it to the house and senate because they want the fed investigated)

  • @rogueronin82

    I have yet to see anyone in Congress say that they are not being independently audited, they just want a different kind of audit.

  • @RetSquid You also have yet to see anyone in congress say that they were confident that the so called inedependent audits were without conflicts of interests... So Youre damned right they just want a "diffrent kind of audit."

  • @rogueronin82

    And then you will claim that THAT audit was bogus because you didn't like the result.

  • @RetSquid If it hadnt been proven that there were NO conflicts of interest,of course I would..

  • @rogueronin82

    And yet the curretn audits are bogus because there is NO evidence that there are conflicts of interest?

  • I am being taxed for money I did not earn and the IRS admits this but is still taxing me so they have zero credibility and are openly commiting fraud and theft.

  • @packrat541

    Hire a lawyer.

  • you really have to be an idiot to believe aaron russo's misinformation

  • Rome had taxes, and Jews were taxed. JESUS said to render onto Cesar that which is Cesar's. Christians, we are to obey the laws of the land, we are not judge and executioner. JESUS said, do not resist evil, but repay evil with good. For it is appointed every man to die, then the judgement. GOD has already a time where every living being will be judged, every deed, lie, deceit, will be brought out into the light. nothing will be hid. we in CHRIST have been pardoned because of HIS BLOOD

  • @trubornagain This isn't about Christianity. Stop making it about religion. You just give Christians a bad name.

  • @retsquid I agree avoiding taxes is "doing" something. I was referring to not filing a 1040. Also, income will not incriminate me, agreed. But I can go to prison for making an innocent error such as taking exemptions, deductions etc. It's called "filing a false tax return".

    I don't have any rights in regard to that?

  • @FreeBlago1

    It is very unlikely something as drastic as prison would happen for any innocent mistakes.

  • @retsquid The response below does make sense.

    The u.s. v. Irwin that you quote comes from a source that definitely has an agenda though. It is not an unbiased decision. The courts have a duty to defend the tax at all costs.

    ..Just like our right to bear arms. It is a constitutional right. We should not need a permit.....the second amendment IS THE PERMIT! It doesn't state "except felons, except people living in Orange County etc"

  • @FreeBlago1

    You can say what you wish about the courts, but what they say IS the law.

  • @RetSquid No. What the courts say is NOT the LAW. The US Constitution is the LAW. To illegally enforce a fraudulent "Federal Action" which was never "LAW" is Racketeering.

    All the "Income Taxes" collected by the IRS goes directly to the shareholders of the "Federal Reserve System" as usury profit. It is never used on behalf of the American people to balance the books or pay down the "National Debt".

    This is the very Ponzi Scheme that created the climate for the American Revolution.

  • @1tonykirk

    Wrong, ALL income taxes go to the Treasury, over $1.3 trillion. The interest payments on the debt are about $250 billion. The Fed PAYS the Treasury, in 2010 over $70 billion. The Constitution is the basis for all laws in the U.S., including income tax laws. Courts DO decide how laws are enforced, what they say IS Common Law.

  • @RetSquid Yea, Riiiight! LOL! They've been beaten too many times in Court. Now, at least we know you are their shill.

    Nice try, Zionist.

  • @1tonykirk

    Really?  Who is 'they'? What were they beaten at? How long have you been a bigot?

  • @1tonykirk Zionism is a Political Movement. "You don't have to be a Jew to be a Zionist" Joe Biden, Zionist.

    Jacobinism, Bolshevism, and Zionism are all the same thing funded by the same Family Banking Cabal, The Rothschilds.

    Everyday their are Rabbi's getting beaten in Jerusalem for protesting against the Israeli Apartheid Zionist State.

    Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, and Engels were not Atheists, they were practicing Satanists. Look it up.

    Your smugness is very very sad.

  • @1tonykirk

    And your bigotry does not make you any smarter about income tax law. You lied about the law, explain that.

  • @RetSquid You accept Authority as Truth instead of Truth as the Authority. You are either a paid shill, a fool, or a idiot.

    I stand behind volumes that can be found at the Library of Congress and University Libraries.

    You quote illegal precedents set by corrupt Judges on behalf of the FreeMasonic Brotherhood that was nearly destroyed by John Qunicy Adams and the Anti Masonic Party in 1832.

    You are a traitor, wittingly or unwittingly and a dishonorable person. A midget.

  • @1tonykirk

    Nope, I've got the truth as authority, you have neither authority nor truth. LOC and SCOTUS prove all of your claims to be false. Any more lies you want to own up to?

  • @RetSquid Like I said, you are either a Fool, and Idiot, or a Fraud on their payroll.

    Citing their lies only proves the point.

  • @1tonykirk

    Sorry if your delusions don't match reality. You are the one who's ideas and actions are ludicrous and lack any sense of logic or mental stability.

  • @RetSquid Nice name, Retsquid. Good euphemism for being plugged into the Matrix. go back to the program, your battery is running low.

  • @1tonykirk

    Still the clueless idiot, the part you play so well.

  • @RetSquid Right. Your the idiot schmuck who thought that identifying Zionism as a threat to American Sovereignty was a Racist comment. You are clueless. I'm surprised you can spell your name.

  • @1tonykirk

    So far I've proved avery single one of your factual, non-conspiracy-theory-claims to be false. Your CT claims can't be proved wrong, they are complete fantasy, that is the nature of CT claims, no matter what is proved, it just means the 'bad guys' were good at hiding the truth, nothing more.

  • @retsquid Filing income tax will violate my rights If I am compelled to do it, and I fill it out honestly, and by doing so, will incriminate me, and put me in prison.

    ..

    No?

  • @FreeBlago1

    The amount of income you have does not incriminate anyone, if the source could inciminate you you can plead the Fifth on that, but not the amount.

    “[I]t is well established that the Fifth Amendment cannot be stretched so far as to absolve a taxpayer’s duty to file a return.”

    United States v. Irwin, 561 F.2d 198, 201

  • @retsquid If it's only civil, then why can I go to prison based on what I put on a 1040? An innocent error can land me in prison.

    .....

    It's the only thing I can think of that can land you in prison for NOT DOING!!!! Laws are based on people DOING illegal things, not based on NOT DOING something.

    ....

  • @FreeBlago1

    Avoiding taxes is "DOING" something.

  • @retsquid If I can go to prison for what I put on my tax forms, I prefer to put nothing. Why take the risk? Prefer to just invoke my right against self incrimination. Simpler, no?

    ...

    If given immunity, I would be happy to participate.

  • @FreeBlago1

    Unfortunately for you. you cannot claim the fifth and not file any income tax forms. Filing is a civil matter and is not covered by the Fifth.

  • There is no law to file because that whould compel you to be a witness against yourself violating your 5th amendment right. By not making it a law, you can't "take the 5th".

  • @FreeBlago1

    Filing income tax does not violate any of your rights.

  • lsn

  • the country was never run by "the people" the constitution was written by rich land owners for rich land owners & not for the common man:(

  • ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

    END THE FED! END IRS! VOTE RON PAUL! The election is not next November. It is NOW! If we don't win the battle of the primaries it's over. And the primaries are being fought now. Register Republican ASAP! Go to BLUEREPUBLICAN(dot)ORG to know how to register in your state!

    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

  • So how do I get them to stop requiring me to pay on my tax bills and threats to levy my bank accounts and take property

  • @102sammy

    You get them to change the law and not levy income taxes. That, or you pay your income tax BEFORE they come looking for back payments.

  • the rules are in the social security act. the SS number is issued by the IMF. 

  • @PeacefulWeapon

    No, the SSN is issued by the SS Administration.

  • @RedSquid: You still fail to see my bigger picture. I know all what you said but that does not change the fact of whose behind it. Have you not read what Bejamin franklin said about these Int'l Bankers? I know they look totally legit and part of the Treasury to the naked eye....but dig deeper and see how far back this goes. Who writes these laws like Title 26 Section 6012 and how far back does it go? The income tax is tyranny. Ron Paul can see it so why can't you? You have over simplified it.

  • @DaOrigTruthSeeker

    And you overstate it. You have already lied about it and have just admitted it.

  • The IRS is a criminal privately owned organization. I know many of you think it's Federal but it's not. The IRS is really run by Int'l Bankers(JEWS) and they hide behind our gov't to do it. There never was a law that makes us pay taxes we just obey the IRS out of fear. The American people should demand that our gov't do away with income taxes and the IRS and the FedReserve....all of which is organized criminal outfits. JFK was outspoken about the secret societies and they killed him for it.

  • @DaOrigTruthSeeker

    You are really confused. The IRS is part of the Treasury. Title 26 is the income tax law and Section 6012 says you have to pay.

  • There is actually one man, I believe his name that had the SUPERIOR COURT rule in his favor, but after he won ... he was forced to continue paying taxes because the IRS continued to harass him!

  • Comment removed

  • its the biggest scam out there...don't pay taxes..they can't lock up everyone...oh yeah,that's why they built fema prison camps in every state...they know that we know...and they are in trouble...but everyone needs to pull together,like in the old days.

  • END THE IRS!

  • ok, modernmafia, don't file at the end of the year and see what happens....

    not filing is tax evasion. that's what landed al capone in alcatraz.

  • @Anon96154 FUCK YOUR TAX BITCH

  • How is it you are the only one that says I'm lying i don't see other people posting what you say only you

    DOWN WITH THE BANKER TAKEOVER OF1913 this country was ruined in 1913 arrest the offshore cartel

  • @MSM586

    Really? You think that the Supreme Court rulings and the laws are lies? Anyone with an active brain cell can see that you are posting lies.

  • @MSM586 am sure u viewed THE MONEY MASTERS n how the fed was voted in 23rd Dec 1913 when all C/men went home for Xmas 2 Bribed C/men voted for it after the us gov put $20M to start the fed fracionl banking Means banks can loan 10X thei assets the fed directors loaned themself $200M n "bought" 90% share in the fed with FA us gov $20m = 10% as H Wilson said After he realised his big Mistake the greatest deception in human history is now been commited against my country my ppl by the fed

  • @polygamous1

    Too bad that there was a quorum of Congressmen who voted for the bill, as well as Senators.

    The House voted 298 yeas to 60 nays, with 76 not voting, the Senate voted 43 yeas to 25 nays with 27 not voting.

    Is it worth looking up the rest?

  • Your never going to get me to believe the tax system in this country is legal. It is run by a bunch of criminals knox and Wilson are burning in hell for what they did to this country nwo runs this country you should know retsquid you served in it's global navy

    When this country collapses you will lose your retirement like everbody else it is all done by deseign keep being the brainwashed sheeple you are

  • @MSM586

    It's nice that you admit you are close-minded and don't want to hear the truth. You can keep posting your lies...I'll keep posting the truth.

  • We need another Aaron Russo badly.

  • RIP Aaron. We need more people like him, a great fact finder.

  • a1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain

    ( IRS publication 6209)

  • @MSM586

    Nice copy and paste of previously disproven lies. IRS pub 6209 is a list of ADP codes, do a word search and you will not find anything like you said, either tribute or Britain.

  • The U.S. has not had a treasury since1921

    ( 41 stat. CH. 214 pg. 654

  • @MSM586

    31 U.S.C. § 302 :Treasury of the United States

    This proves you wrong...again...

  • The IRS is not a us government agency it is an agency of the IMF

    Diversified metal products v IRS et al. Cv-93-405e-eje USDCI, public law94-564,

    Senate report 94-1148pg 5967, reorganization plan no. 26 ,pubic law 102-391

  • @MSM586

    “[T]he Internal Revenue Service is organized to carry out the broad responsibilities of the Secretary of the Treasury under section 7801(a) of the 1954 Code for the administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws.”

    Donaldson v. United States, 400 U.S. 517, 534 (1971).

  • Income taxes are unconstitutional. Deal with it.

  • @RetSquid How is it Constitutional? It's a private corporation owned by the Federal Reserve, another private corporation. The Federal Reserve was never ratified by the 36 states it needed to make it legal only 2 states ratified it, so that means it's all a fraud.

  • @mindmelt13

    Sorry, you have been sadly misinformed. The IRS is part of the Treasury Department. The Federal Reserve didn't have to be ratified by anyone, it's created by a legislative Act, not a Constitutional Amendment. Every State, all fifty of them, agrees that the 16th Amendment WAS ratified, there is no doubt that it was.

  • @RetSquid It was never ratified by 36 states or 3/4 of all states which there were 48 at the time. An " Act" is not a Law btw. And as far a Mullins being anti-Semetic, these Ashkenazi Jews are not even Semetic, they come from southern Ukraine(Khazaria), they converted to the religion of Judaism during the Crusades.After their empire fell they migrated west to Poland and Germany.

  • According to the House: Alabama, Kentucky, South Carolina, Illinois, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Maryland, Georgia, Texas, Ohio, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Montana, Indiana, California, Nevada, South Dakota, Nebraska, North Dakota, Kansas, Michigan, North Carolina, Colorado, Iowa, Missouri, Maine, Tennessee, Arkansas, Wisconsin, New York, Arizona, Minnesota, Louisiana, West Virginia, New Mexico, Massachusetts, New Hampshire all ratified it.

  • @mindmelt13

    So the fact that Mullins supported Hitler's ideas against ALL Jews, converts or not, doesn't bother you? Face it, he was nuts.

    Show me ONE State that has come out and said that someone lied and that they DIDN'T ratify the 16th Amendment.

  • @mindmelt13

    A Congressional Act, when signed by the President, becomes a Law. That is how the Fed was created, no ratification neccessary.

    mEJL2Uuv-oQ

  • @RetSquid Yeah and it was done when all of Congress went on their Christmas break, and then Woodrow Wilson's dumbass signed it and sold Americans down the river. 

  • @mindmelt13

    No, the was a quorum in the House and Senate, it was passed the way every other bill is passed. The only part of your original post that is partly correct is the the Fed is a private corporation. It is not totally private because it's Board of Governors is chosen by the President and approved by Congress.

  • @RetSquid Well a private corporation shouldn't be printing our money(fiat currency) out of thin air with interest(debt) attached to it. From 1913 to today the dollar went from actually being worth that amount to today being only worth about a penny. What a great scam they got going on.

    "Let me issue and control a nations money and I care not who makes it's laws." Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild