Good ebening, wadies und gentelmen. I shall now flog meinem hands up und down the keyboard für you. Afterwards, all I shall ask—und expect—is your tepid applause.
Now I understand why many people try to do strange things when they play this piece, especially at the end. It is interesting, but I prefer the original score (the slide is not the best idea). On the other hand, Rubinstein offers a very expressive version in spite of the (unnecessary?) effects of style and the too fast tempo.
He even could be the biggest one on piano, but - it's almost unbelievable - He hated to practice :) Food, party's and women's were more important :) When he grown older (about 40) - as I heard - He start to practice every day, and got this autstanding shape. As We all can hear...
I can't figure out the fingerings for this piece. It's astonishingly fast once you start playing. My main concern is the beginning of the melody in the right hand (not the trills).
Interpretazione immersa in un clima di totale e delirante esaltazione, ma da fibrillazione, che fa venire i brividi ancora oggi dopo tanti decenni !!!! Arthur Rubinstein coinvolgente come una droga che stordisce, e ammaliante coma la Maga Circe per Ulisse !!!!!!!!!!!!
Although he takes huge liberties with the score, I have to say the playing is wonderfully compelling. I dare say that De Falla probably envisaged that sort of abandon that Rubinstein brings to the piece.
Rubinstein played this as an encore after one of his SydneyTown Hall concerts (in the 1960s, I think). The piece was his. So was the hand lifting bit.!!
BTW, if I had to point anything that I don't like in this particular interpretation, I'd say it's a bit too fast. It needs to be a dance. But great playing otherwise.
Rubinstein was so incredibly special. In about 1970 I heard him play a Chopin concert in London. I will never forget that magical night. He always had such a superb sensitive touch.
I much prefer this version to de Larrocha's. Far more powerful and expressive. de Larrocha's trying too hard for my liking. Mischa Maisky also does a great cello rendition but, in my humble opinion, this piece sounds best when done by a full orchestra, like the rendition done by the Berlin PO with Daniel Barenboim conducting. An awesome piece, regardless. Thanks for posting this. A good vid of a maestro playing a difficult piece exceptionally well.
Artur Rubinstein's interpretation of this ritual Fire Dance is less sensitive and interesting than Alicia delaRocha's one.
This is accepted.
However, it must not been forgetten that Rubinstein is not spanish and the Fire Dance by Manuel de Falla does not belong to the repetory which best fits to him.
@Greenoshua Gotta love that "This is accepted." I take it you feel this way despite the fact that Rubinstein was famous throughout the Spanish-speaking world for the fidelity of his interpretations of Spanish music. Spanish people often expressed amazement that a Polish man could so clearly capture the soul of their music.
On the other hand, I love de Larrocha, and she plays this beautifully as well, and much different from Rubinstein. Each performance has much to recommend it.
@robtrodes First of all, it's Spain's music, "Spanish speaking world" may share a language but there are many different musical forms, and Spain's is very distinctive specially in the classical tradition.
That said, I agree Rubinstein captures well the spirit of Spain's music, quite a feature because the difficulty of mastering Spanish music is to feel the right accents. He is topped by Larrocha though. No one I've heard can equal Larrocha's interpretation of this. She simply owns the piece.
@NicotinMan Thank you for sharing your opinion. Personally, I find things to like equally in each. You will also note that I made no mention of "the music of the Spanish-speaking world" as your response seems to imply. I don't disagree with your statement about Spanish music having a style distinct from that of other Spanish-speaking countries.
Except that for me this show makes the musical energy less intense, less charged with full concentration. Rubinstein is loosing so much energy in try to show his best face, his best gestutre .. that some persons can heard that his pusic is not so great .. of course, many like it ... loool ! I constate the same show 0.42 - 0.47 secondes of the video .. but my conclusion are just the opposite of piano345's one .. not marvellous : but disastrous ! even ridiculous ...
Horowitz and Cziffra were often accused of showmanship in performance. Here Rubinstein shows that before an audience he could equal them even surpass them. Raising his hands high above the keyboard for those stamping chords brings even more excitement to this Ritual Fire Dance. Wonderful!
this is incredible playing. and of course its Rubinstein himself playing - BUT if you look and listen closely at 3:12 you will notice its actually a playback ;)
For a much more interesting interpretattion of this piece of music, I recommand the Alicia de Larrocha's interpretation. The emotion is the one of the compositor ! the question of expressivity is important, but it requires the rigth expressivity, the one which has been desired by the composer. Her left hand is technically much more superior, and her understanding of this piece of music is really much more superior, too ...
I totally disagree. Artur Rubinstein 's interpretation of this ritual fire dance was loved by the widow of Manuel de Falla. She assured Artur he had exactely played the way Manuel wanted it! xD
ok disagree , no problem ... it reminds me 40 years ago .. face to my father, all people used to say to him how he was great, how is was good .. and secretly, when they were with me, they used to say to me that I must act and tell to him the true; he was bad ! ... Rubinstein was powerful and influent .. so de Falla 's widow to make some money had to say such sentence ... better to have the money than to be excellentissime
Your answer proves, that you do not understand what is pure art!
At the time of Rubinstein money was not so important. And this was a private meeting, so Manuel de Falla's widow had no interest at all in this way. *rofl*
So I'm not going to dicuss the artistry of Artur Rubinstein with an ignorant like you.
@MusikPiratCH yopur answer to my answer demonstrates to me that you are someone who got no hear and no hear means no brain ! of course money has been important since millemium ! study the antique Egypt and study even Sigmund Freud's life.
I thanks you to not discuss with me about the none artistry of artur Rubinstein with me. and listen for once the Alicia dela Rocha's performance ! by the way .. read the comment of Piano345 about showmanship .. this is a veru good statement ! SHOW !
I totally agree about mistakes ,I prefer to hear a bravura and real performance with emotion and mistakes rather than a perfect but sterile and robotic performance .
Realmente un virtuoso musical, la genialidad de su cerebro se transmite a traves de sus dedos, que al ponerlos sobre ese piano, no hace sino demostrarnos que es sino el único, pero si uno de los pocos que nacieron con la gracia divina.
j'adore il est trop fort, je ne peux pas étudier sans écouter Rubinstein, son génie m'inspire.
Uno ve en sus ojos la concentración y dedicación a su obra.
Brillant. Truly the best way to study is to have Rubinstein in the background. He's inspiring and motivating at the same time. His tempo, talent and concentration come together for a masterpiece.
you arent completely right. playing correctly means you say the truth.you follow the sheet music.of course emotion and good timing is very important but when you hear a great pianist playing you should feel safe that you wont hear mistakes.if you know a piano piece very well you feel displeased when you hear mistakes
you arent completely right. playing correctly means you say the truth.you follow the sheet music.of course emotion and good timing is very important but when you hear a great pianist playing you should feel safe that you wont hear mistakes.if you know a piano piece very well you feel displeased when you hear mistakes
Wrong note at about 1:13. I guess that means this is a bad pianist. Just joking. I think the showman in him made him play a bit recklessly at times. But Horowitz made mistakes too, as did Schnabel.
Are you crazy? The Rubienstein compared to Lang Lang, that shit! He is an Asian who just wants to distort the original parts ... uhullll someone out there has that autobiography that he did? the 2nd volume!
You have no respect at all for Asian talents, like Langlang and Yuja Wang. What do you hate Chinese that bad? Were you slapped or insulted by a Chinese some time ago?
Rubinstein was not the best pianist of his time - he used to make a lot of mistakes. Violinist Heifetz used to berate him when they did chamber music together, and I've heard that Rubinstein cringes in fear whenever Heifetz scolded him.
A pianist isn't measured by the mistakes he or she plays, but more by their understanding of the piece and the skill/emotion they can put into it. Sure, you could get elitist morons who would gladly play the most difficult piece they can with absolutely no emotion, but they just end up sounding exactly like they are; elitest idiots. I could name some examples...
Any real pianist wouldn't care about mistakes. >_>
And comparing him to a violinist for degration's sake doesn't quite work.
However, by all means getting the sound you want across is more important than getting the piece perfect. There's such thing as a "very boring, generic" version of a song, and I dare say Rubinstein is better than that.
@MotEmantsalon pianists do care about mistakes, but playing all the notes perfectly is not the main goal. like horowitz said: i'm not heifetz, i do not want perfection...
@utubuser10 I'm never going to live that one down. xD Perhaps that was phrased a bit arrogantly, but I think to an extent one shouldn't care about mistakes. If you mess a couple of notes up, they can be covered. If you mess up the rhythm or feel of the piece, you've lost all hope. And it's not as if the whole thing is covered in mistakes. -_-
@MotEmantsalon i think that stating that "one shouldn't care about mistakes," is somewhat misplaced. if one cares about conveying the spirit of the music, then getting the notes right is a given. but i agree that it is not the only aspect of what goes into a transcendent rendition. you know rubenstein is a bad example in this matter since he, after seeing horowitz, reappraised of his own playing which up to that time had been rather callous with respect to accuracy of notes. he certainly cared.
@utubuser10 I believe I've already explained, or at least thoroughly implied, that my comment was only "to an extent". Correct, misplaced and arrogant. I've already said that.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
A "show-off" (those 3-ft bouncing arms) performance, that mostly shows some inadaquacies. As someone said earlier, this is not the original version by deFalla (as I knew and played it as a teen-ager) and Ruby adds a lot and DETRACTS a lot, e.g. the ending. He either forgot or deliberately left out about 1 or 2 measures. For the REAL thing, check de Larrocha on YouTube.
Well, I do prefer de Larrocha's version, but I think the differences here are because he's playing a different transcription, of which I think there are a few, if I'm not mistaken. This excerpt from the ballet "El amor brujo" has undergone numerous different sorts of transcriptions, so I wouldn't say he "wimped out."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He leaves out the left hand trills once the melody starts. That's not how it was written. He wimped out. Check out de Larrocha for a better interpretation and one that actually adheres to the original score.
Pedantry can b tiresome, however 4 ugcodoo1? and "oceansurferg". As stated: R was a friend of Falla and got permission to transcribe Ritual Fire Dance for piano, it comes from 'El Amor Brujo". For example R gave the first Western performance of Nights in the Garden of Spain - and he was present at the premier performance in 1916 in Madrid. His friendship and the story is on page 157 of Harvey Sachs biography of Rubinstein This "arrangement' was a favorite encore all R's life.
Rubinstein was 60 when he played this in the film it was his own arrangement and an encore favorite. He was a most natural pianist with technique the equal of Horowitz (or anyone else in his day).however he was primarily an interpreter! He had one of the widest repertory of any musician and in his youth introduced much "new" music Falla was a friend ("he new everyone") -he played extensively in Spain and introduced a significant amount of. Spanish music to the west.....frogmanpano
He could wow the public when he wanted to...but was a serious musician for those who have the attention span listen to him play Schubert's d960 Sonata in B flat #21 he spoke 8 languages and was interested in everything -very widely read and a legendary raconteur. he was a great chamber music player too -not something found in most soloists of his stature. His Chopin is for many the yardstick comparison. But he said there is no such thing as the "best performance" frogmanpiano
Well Maestro I have to say that you'll have to concede this one to Alicia De Laroccha. She plays less quickly more profoundly, richer in tone and dare I say with less mechanical and more sentient understanding of the piece. So why have you been listened too so much. Is it because not enough people have heared of Alicia. Spanish musicians have genius too. Well for those who have not heared of her more to their regret!
Good ebening, wadies und gentelmen. I shall now flog meinem hands up und down the keyboard für you. Afterwards, all I shall ask—und expect—is your tepid applause.
Malodorok 1 week ago
CAR
NATASA666333 1 week ago in playlist Liked videos
Oléééééé ;)
MNSTsunset 1 week ago
Terrific
MegaI1995 1 month ago
Impressive! Great! Awesome!
dedeasdfg 1 month ago
Now I understand why many people try to do strange things when they play this piece, especially at the end. It is interesting, but I prefer the original score (the slide is not the best idea). On the other hand, Rubinstein offers a very expressive version in spite of the (unnecessary?) effects of style and the too fast tempo.
UnknownFromPluto 1 month ago
@UnknownFromPluto I absolutely agree with you, but I think the effects are unnecesary. I prefer Alicia de Larrocha's versión.
juanmaMCMLXXXII 1 month ago
¿¿Y ese final??
juanmaMCMLXXXII 2 months ago
AMAZING!
botbagel 2 months ago
He even could be the biggest one on piano, but - it's almost unbelievable - He hated to practice :) Food, party's and women's were more important :) When he grown older (about 40) - as I heard - He start to practice every day, and got this autstanding shape. As We all can hear...
Cheers
8art 3 months ago
incredible, like being in heaven without any obstacles....so in touch
cheries5 3 months ago
What the !
Elze77 3 months ago
When I was a kid I saw Artur Rubinstein play this as an encore in San Diego. Great!
geological95 3 months ago in playlist More videos from BelCantoSociety
Un modo molto "teatrale" di suonare. Perché no?
mirrors1 3 months ago
@mirrors1 no
arroz5447 3 months ago
lol guckt mich an bin ein elch
DianaRosecd110 4 months ago
press 7 for endless dinosaur :D
Dontsaltthekitty 4 months ago
geil übrigens hab was geiles gefunden habs bei mir stehn
TarenDelciemx20 4 months ago
Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nuberojadom001 4 months ago
lool mein hintern ist geil
TamicaJustinef655 4 months ago
Wielki POLAK - Dziekuje
grontek 5 months ago
I can't figure out the fingerings for this piece. It's astonishingly fast once you start playing. My main concern is the beginning of the melody in the right hand (not the trills).
UnScriptedFlix 5 months ago
Comment removed
UnScriptedFlix 5 months ago
Perfection defined
intrec1 6 months ago
Esos glissandos aparte de bien hechos, son visualmente increibles
sebastianrc 6 months ago
i mean, do we still have pianists like him?
LaEspriella 6 months ago
@LaEspriella Yes! Her name is Jung Lin! Please visit my channel and she is first on my playlist!!! Please, be my guest! Lily Tokareff
lilytoka 5 months ago
oh my god , his technique is so beautifull , i can´t believe that
ridehorce 6 months ago
Es lo mejor que he visto núnca, El es la música ..
azkartasun 6 months ago
Masterpiece & Maestro...WOW...
Etheryczna 6 months ago
I love it... the music is so... delicate. His interpretation is amazing.
GingiYume 6 months ago
Lucky me!
I was the one-thousand-and-first to press the like button.
Thanks for sharing this masterpiece.
123Goldielocks 6 months ago
Interpretazione immersa in un clima di totale e delirante esaltazione, ma da fibrillazione, che fa venire i brividi ancora oggi dopo tanti decenni !!!! Arthur Rubinstein coinvolgente come una droga che stordisce, e ammaliante coma la Maga Circe per Ulisse !!!!!!!!!!!!
darkblueangel1956 7 months ago 4
He reminds me of a grasshopper!
bayareapianist 7 months ago 2
wowwwww !!! :)
juan99160956 7 months ago
this is my favorite song
chalupagravy1234 7 months ago
Although he takes huge liberties with the score, I have to say the playing is wonderfully compelling. I dare say that De Falla probably envisaged that sort of abandon that Rubinstein brings to the piece.
meredith21846 8 months ago
Awesome!
Sweasy26 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My two favorite pianists are Horowitz and Rubinstein, I think.
nicecoolstuff13579 8 months ago
Comment removed
nicecoolstuff13579 8 months ago
Rubinstein's beast. :)
nicecoolstuff13579 8 months ago
he should raise his arms higher!
marcohorowitz8 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
geîles_vídeö_ïch_wêìss_dass_pàsst_nìcht_hïêr_rêìñ_ãbër_ìch_bín_sõ_eînsâm
LunayyNanciia66 8 months ago 32
That was my first oeuvre at my first Concert/
classicallady 9 months ago
The greatest ever, Rubinstein =D
yuukimaru87 9 months ago
This is an excellent piece.
Rubinstein too fast in many parts
movohox 10 months ago
0:48 Im a dinosaur!
TheSyntaxOverride 10 months ago 132
@TheSyntaxOverride LMAO !
globule200 10 months ago 4
@TheSyntaxOverride You made my day... twice
UnScriptedFlix 5 months ago
@UnScriptedFlix aw thanks
TheSyntaxOverride 5 months ago
Rubinstein played this as an encore after one of his SydneyTown Hall concerts (in the 1960s, I think). The piece was his. So was the hand lifting bit.!!
gerardbedecarter 10 months ago
I like the way he plays
SirWookash 11 months ago
i am learning this piece and i attempted at moving my hands like he did at 0:48 and its impossible
theanguished1 11 months ago
@theanguished1 Heh, heh....Obviously not....
beeroosterm 11 months ago
awesomeeeee
big7bang 1 year ago
4 chicks and 5 dudes in the front row. someone had to go home and yank it.
DrLectr 1 year ago
Immense pianist, but for this piece my preference goes to de Larrocha interpretation, maybe for her spanish soul...
canaxis69 1 year ago
0:47 I'm a dinosaur!!
Quinnsmash 1 year ago 14
es increible como se entrega ala musica, como la siente.....
es el mejor
ThePianistCat 1 year ago
Rubinstein plays it the way EVERYBODY wants to hear it and that is his genius.
MrFilmWorld 1 year ago
BTW, if I had to point anything that I don't like in this particular interpretation, I'd say it's a bit too fast. It needs to be a dance. But great playing otherwise.
NicotinMan 1 year ago
Rubinstein was so incredibly special. In about 1970 I heard him play a Chopin concert in London. I will never forget that magical night. He always had such a superb sensitive touch.
cattleman6420012000 1 year ago
Yeah, Zack de la Rocha does kick ass.
McLeod54 1 year ago
I prefer de la Rocha's performance. I think that she better captures de essence of the piece.
ALYSKANDER 1 year ago 2
I much prefer this version to de Larrocha's. Far more powerful and expressive. de Larrocha's trying too hard for my liking. Mischa Maisky also does a great cello rendition but, in my humble opinion, this piece sounds best when done by a full orchestra, like the rendition done by the Berlin PO with Daniel Barenboim conducting. An awesome piece, regardless. Thanks for posting this. A good vid of a maestro playing a difficult piece exceptionally well.
weirdunclebob 1 year ago
Artur Rubinstein's interpretation of this ritual Fire Dance is less sensitive and interesting than Alicia delaRocha's one.
This is accepted.
However, it must not been forgetten that Rubinstein is not spanish and the Fire Dance by Manuel de Falla does not belong to the repetory which best fits to him.
Greenoshua 1 year ago
@Greenoshua Gotta love that "This is accepted." I take it you feel this way despite the fact that Rubinstein was famous throughout the Spanish-speaking world for the fidelity of his interpretations of Spanish music. Spanish people often expressed amazement that a Polish man could so clearly capture the soul of their music.
On the other hand, I love de Larrocha, and she plays this beautifully as well, and much different from Rubinstein. Each performance has much to recommend it.
robtrodes 1 year ago
@robtrodes First of all, it's Spain's music, "Spanish speaking world" may share a language but there are many different musical forms, and Spain's is very distinctive specially in the classical tradition.
That said, I agree Rubinstein captures well the spirit of Spain's music, quite a feature because the difficulty of mastering Spanish music is to feel the right accents. He is topped by Larrocha though. No one I've heard can equal Larrocha's interpretation of this. She simply owns the piece.
NicotinMan 1 year ago
@NicotinMan Thank you for sharing your opinion. Personally, I find things to like equally in each. You will also note that I made no mention of "the music of the Spanish-speaking world" as your response seems to imply. I don't disagree with your statement about Spanish music having a style distinct from that of other Spanish-speaking countries.
robtrodes 1 year ago
@robtrodes Oh, maybe I just misread and mixed up different posts when answering.
BTW, any other remarkable but least known interpretation on this piece? Not necessarily only on piano.
NicotinMan 1 year ago
Except that for me this show makes the musical energy less intense, less charged with full concentration. Rubinstein is loosing so much energy in try to show his best face, his best gestutre .. that some persons can heard that his pusic is not so great .. of course, many like it ... loool ! I constate the same show 0.42 - 0.47 secondes of the video .. but my conclusion are just the opposite of piano345's one .. not marvellous : but disastrous ! even ridiculous ...
Berdjum 1 year ago
Horowitz and Cziffra were often accused of showmanship in performance. Here Rubinstein shows that before an audience he could equal them even surpass them. Raising his hands high above the keyboard for those stamping chords brings even more excitement to this Ritual Fire Dance. Wonderful!
piano345 1 year ago 3
Alicia de Larrocha's interpretation must be listened before to comment my comment
Berdjum 1 year ago
Beautifull. Haunting . Sounds like De Fala suffered some kind of Moorish influence in this composition. Rubinstein excell as usual.
VIRIATO1942 1 year ago
@tirolerhut79
I don't think it...
Sorry, it's incredible and impossible
MegaFritzo 1 year ago
@MegaFritzo then how do you explain to me the part at 3:12? he plays somthing completely different than what we hear.
tirolerhut79 1 year ago
One word: choreography :)
ploschad 1 year ago
this is incredible playing. and of course its Rubinstein himself playing - BUT if you look and listen closely at 3:12 you will notice its actually a playback ;)
tirolerhut79 1 year ago
This is the greatest interpretation of a Falla's work ever. Rubi rocks!
TheMandrino 1 year ago
For a much more interesting interpretattion of this piece of music, I recommand the Alicia de Larrocha's interpretation. The emotion is the one of the compositor ! the question of expressivity is important, but it requires the rigth expressivity, the one which has been desired by the composer. Her left hand is technically much more superior, and her understanding of this piece of music is really much more superior, too ...
Berdjum 1 year ago
@Berdjum
I totally disagree. Artur Rubinstein 's interpretation of this ritual fire dance was loved by the widow of Manuel de Falla. She assured Artur he had exactely played the way Manuel wanted it! xD
MusikPiratCH 1 year ago
@MusikPiratCH
ok disagree , no problem ... it reminds me 40 years ago .. face to my father, all people used to say to him how he was great, how is was good .. and secretly, when they were with me, they used to say to me that I must act and tell to him the true; he was bad ! ... Rubinstein was powerful and influent .. so de Falla 's widow to make some money had to say such sentence ... better to have the money than to be excellentissime
Berdjum 1 year ago
@Berdjum
Your answer proves, that you do not understand what is pure art!
At the time of Rubinstein money was not so important. And this was a private meeting, so Manuel de Falla's widow had no interest at all in this way. *rofl*
So I'm not going to dicuss the artistry of Artur Rubinstein with an ignorant like you.
MusikPiratCH 1 year ago
@MusikPiratCH yopur answer to my answer demonstrates to me that you are someone who got no hear and no hear means no brain ! of course money has been important since millemium ! study the antique Egypt and study even Sigmund Freud's life.
I thanks you to not discuss with me about the none artistry of artur Rubinstein with me. and listen for once the Alicia dela Rocha's performance ! by the way .. read the comment of Piano345 about showmanship .. this is a veru good statement ! SHOW !
Berdjum 1 year ago
@MusikPiratCH Can you give to ys a definition of what is pure art ?
Berdjum 1 year ago
Comment removed
Berdjum 1 year ago
Comment removed
Berdjum 1 year ago
@MusikPiratCH Yes but remember: Falla's widow is not Falla but another, if somewhat qualified, listener.
NicotinMan 1 year ago
I totally agree about mistakes ,I prefer to hear a bravura and real performance with emotion and mistakes rather than a perfect but sterile and robotic performance .
poupee58 1 year ago
increadibly powerful performance - and amazing how well recorded at those times...
khi590 1 year ago
Only one word...... GREAT !
Baiocco1984 1 year ago
can someone send me the link to get the score?? thanks in advance
michaeltheace 1 year ago
@michaeltheace It's on IMSLP for free.
Bibliomaniac15 1 year ago
Realmente un virtuoso musical, la genialidad de su cerebro se transmite a traves de sus dedos, que al ponerlos sobre ese piano, no hace sino demostrarnos que es sino el único, pero si uno de los pocos que nacieron con la gracia divina.
angelsuntaxi 1 year ago
A definate Romantic Pianist! And on film and vid!
TheMikester307 1 year ago
j'adore il est trop fort, je ne peux pas étudier sans écouter Rubinstein, son génie m'inspire.
Uno ve en sus ojos la concentración y dedicación a su obra.
Brillant. Truly the best way to study is to have Rubinstein in the background. He's inspiring and motivating at the same time. His tempo, talent and concentration come together for a masterpiece.
OSHERL007 1 year ago
His performance is so wonderful indeed.
He is amazing pianist. All of them are so fantastic.
pianolover1004 1 year ago
wow, I never saw any pianist throwing his hands up in the air like him when playing those repetitive chords!
martimtavares 1 year ago 6
@martimtavares I know! I think I'll try it too in my version of this piece XD Really, this is the best version for students to referance to ^^;
Viyemelle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you arent completely right. playing correctly means you say the truth.you follow the sheet music.of course emotion and good timing is very important but when you hear a great pianist playing you should feel safe that you wont hear mistakes.if you know a piano piece very well you feel displeased when you hear mistakes
MrKKRen 1 year ago
you arent completely right. playing correctly means you say the truth.you follow the sheet music.of course emotion and good timing is very important but when you hear a great pianist playing you should feel safe that you wont hear mistakes.if you know a piano piece very well you feel displeased when you hear mistakes
MrKKRen 1 year ago
Mistake is at 1:15 or :16, meant to write.
charold3 1 year ago
Wrong note at about 1:13. I guess that means this is a bad pianist. Just joking. I think the showman in him made him play a bit recklessly at times. But Horowitz made mistakes too, as did Schnabel.
charold3 1 year ago
only martha has that kind of passion today.
zebb1111 1 year ago
MAGNIFICENT!!!!!!!!!!!! Perla.
perla51 1 year ago
Genial! Tanto Rubinstein el pianista como la musica de Falla!
dearmalika 1 year ago 4
Comment removed
deBierce01 1 year ago
Impressionante, impareggiabile!!!!!!!!!!!
edaricca2009 1 year ago
pom pom pom! pom pom pom! un-pa un-pa un-pa
splendido!
giogiorn 1 year ago 6
jajajj me dio risa !! pom po pom! un pa un pa! jajajajaj
Andresppiiaannoo 1 year ago
The audience members are all identical to one another.
mllhartshorn 2 years ago 10
no veo el modo de decir algo.
HISHASHIS 2 years ago 3
Superbo!
coguar0 2 years ago 3
Brilliant!!
AngelBeib 2 years ago 3
Simply splendid!!! Perla.
perla51 2 years ago 3
woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow
that was simply amazing
Caleuche3 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Too overblown for my taste, nevertheless quite entertaining.
meredith21846 2 years ago
I'm just expressing my opinion ... não pode ????
Emersonmusica 2 years ago 2
Toute la diaspora bave évidemment.
antoinezygfryd 2 years ago
Lang Lang ???
Are you crazy? The Rubienstein compared to Lang Lang, that shit! He is an Asian who just wants to distort the original parts ... uhullll someone out there has that autobiography that he did? the 2nd volume!
Emersonmusica 2 years ago 3
You have no respect at all for Asian talents, like Langlang and Yuja Wang. What do you hate Chinese that bad? Were you slapped or insulted by a Chinese some time ago?
SamuelConcepcion 2 years ago
lang lang and yuja wang aren't so great, but there are very good chinese musicians - just those two aren't the best representations
bigmelt 2 years ago 2
2:25 - 2:31 AMAZING!! That hand movement is really amazing
NeuronalRQ 2 years ago 4
thank you very much for post! Only enjoy one time more Rubinstein is a pleasure for the soul!
cicerone63 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
Rubinstein was not the best pianist of his time - he used to make a lot of mistakes. Violinist Heifetz used to berate him when they did chamber music together, and I've heard that Rubinstein cringes in fear whenever Heifetz scolded him.
NellyBoogan 2 years ago
A pianist isn't measured by the mistakes he or she plays, but more by their understanding of the piece and the skill/emotion they can put into it. Sure, you could get elitist morons who would gladly play the most difficult piece they can with absolutely no emotion, but they just end up sounding exactly like they are; elitest idiots. I could name some examples...
Any real pianist wouldn't care about mistakes. >_>
And comparing him to a violinist for degration's sake doesn't quite work.
MotEmantsalon 2 years ago 69
"Any real pianist wouldn't care about mistakes."
Do you realise how foolish that sentence is?
MusicalEutopia 2 years ago
Absolutely.
However, by all means getting the sound you want across is more important than getting the piece perfect. There's such thing as a "very boring, generic" version of a song, and I dare say Rubinstein is better than that.
MotEmantsalon 2 years ago 28
I concur.
MusicalEutopia 2 years ago
Comment removed
deBierce01 1 year ago
Comment removed
MotEmantsalon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deBierce01
?
I was saying he's better than a generic version.
"I dare say Rubinstein is better than that."
Maybe you're blind.
MotEmantsalon 1 year ago
@deBierce01 I'd better get my glasses on, sorry about that.
deBierce01 1 year ago
@MotEmantsalon pianists do care about mistakes, but playing all the notes perfectly is not the main goal. like horowitz said: i'm not heifetz, i do not want perfection...
stagesix6 1 year ago
@stagesix6 I'm never going to live this one down, am I? xD
I hadn't slept for rather a long time when I wrote that, so my wording was a bit off. I believe I corrected myself several times.
MotEmantsalon 1 year ago
@MotEmantsalon Couldn't have said it any better myself !
AmericanCars101 1 year ago
@MotEmantsalon As Kenny Werner says, "There are no wrong notes". :)
cfwpiano 1 year ago
@MotEmantsalon '...any real pianist wouldn't care about mistakes." now, who's being an elitist idiot? and who the heck is "degration?"
utubuser10 1 year ago
@utubuser10 I'm never going to live that one down. xD Perhaps that was phrased a bit arrogantly, but I think to an extent one shouldn't care about mistakes. If you mess a couple of notes up, they can be covered. If you mess up the rhythm or feel of the piece, you've lost all hope. And it's not as if the whole thing is covered in mistakes. -_-
MotEmantsalon 1 year ago
@MotEmantsalon i think that stating that "one shouldn't care about mistakes," is somewhat misplaced. if one cares about conveying the spirit of the music, then getting the notes right is a given. but i agree that it is not the only aspect of what goes into a transcendent rendition. you know rubenstein is a bad example in this matter since he, after seeing horowitz, reappraised of his own playing which up to that time had been rather callous with respect to accuracy of notes. he certainly cared.
utubuser10 1 year ago
@utubuser10 I believe I've already explained, or at least thoroughly implied, that my comment was only "to an extent". Correct, misplaced and arrogant. I've already said that.
MotEmantsalon 1 year ago
@MotEmantsalon Got it.
utubuser10 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A "show-off" (those 3-ft bouncing arms) performance, that mostly shows some inadaquacies. As someone said earlier, this is not the original version by deFalla (as I knew and played it as a teen-ager) and Ruby adds a lot and DETRACTS a lot, e.g. the ending. He either forgot or deliberately left out about 1 or 2 measures. For the REAL thing, check de Larrocha on YouTube.
janicezany 2 years ago
Well, I do prefer de Larrocha's version, but I think the differences here are because he's playing a different transcription, of which I think there are a few, if I'm not mistaken. This excerpt from the ballet "El amor brujo" has undergone numerous different sorts of transcriptions, so I wouldn't say he "wimped out."
smurashige 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He leaves out the left hand trills once the melody starts. That's not how it was written. He wimped out. Check out de Larrocha for a better interpretation and one that actually adheres to the original score.
shack017 2 years ago
Mind you, this was Rubinstein's own transcription.
GeneralKuno 2 years ago 3
Manuel de Falla ...
spartan1081990 2 years ago
AMAZING!!!!!
theawesomeviolinist 2 years ago
bravooooooooooooooooooo
marniewitchjdr 2 years ago
Pedantry can b tiresome, however 4 ugcodoo1? and "oceansurferg". As stated: R was a friend of Falla and got permission to transcribe Ritual Fire Dance for piano, it comes from 'El Amor Brujo". For example R gave the first Western performance of Nights in the Garden of Spain - and he was present at the premier performance in 1916 in Madrid. His friendship and the story is on page 157 of Harvey Sachs biography of Rubinstein This "arrangement' was a favorite encore all R's life.
frogmanpiano 2 years ago
This is the second piece for my marching band's show. I had no idea it was originally for piano. He plays it brilliantly.
oceansurferg 2 years ago
Actually it was written for an orchestra...I can't remember what it was from. It was just transcribed for piano.
UGC001 2 years ago
He really looks like Teller from Penn and Teller.
pookiehohn 2 years ago
I dont see that before but it is true XD
NeuronalRQ 2 years ago
You men Teller looks like him.
timfxf 2 years ago
from penn and teller show? yeah, it's true!
stagesix6 2 years ago
Rubinstein was 60 when he played this in the film it was his own arrangement and an encore favorite. He was a most natural pianist with technique the equal of Horowitz (or anyone else in his day).however he was primarily an interpreter! He had one of the widest repertory of any musician and in his youth introduced much "new" music Falla was a friend ("he new everyone") -he played extensively in Spain and introduced a significant amount of. Spanish music to the west.....frogmanpano
frogmanpiano 2 years ago 2
My 3rd audition....inspired by Rubistein
classicallady 2 years ago
A God of the piano!
arikcarlo 2 years ago 9
his look starting at :30 is awesome . Rubinstein was THE man.
Crad4DRC 2 years ago
He could wow the public when he wanted to...but was a serious musician for those who have the attention span listen to him play Schubert's d960 Sonata in B flat #21 he spoke 8 languages and was interested in everything -very widely read and a legendary raconteur. he was a great chamber music player too -not something found in most soloists of his stature. His Chopin is for many the yardstick comparison. But he said there is no such thing as the "best performance" frogmanpiano
frogmanpiano 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
No, lang-lang is the best.
SamuelConcepcion 2 years ago
I really hope you are kidding...and btw I never said Rubinstein was the best, I said he was the man.
Crad4DRC 2 years ago 8
Who is lang-lang?????
stubs13 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a racist you are. I know you hate lang-lang just because he is an Asian man.
MrSammyConcepcion 2 years ago
and that comment isn't racist?
125themajjixmaaan 2 years ago
He's an Asian pianist that's become rather popular. People are rather critical of him though. Personally, I love his Liebestraum.
hehe, he has funny expressions though.
silosas 2 years ago
Big Falla, Big Rubinstein, Awesome
ShomerShmuel 2 years ago
make trills like that is pretty hard, believe me
stagesix6 2 years ago
We're playing this in my school's wind ensemble this year; to see this guy play this by himself is just like... o_O
xohugaholicox 2 years ago
YITBOS
Amazing
jauble 2 years ago
Amazing performance; brilliant.
Walvis2007 2 years ago
Well Maestro I have to say that you'll have to concede this one to Alicia De Laroccha. She plays less quickly more profoundly, richer in tone and dare I say with less mechanical and more sentient understanding of the piece. So why have you been listened too so much. Is it because not enough people have heared of Alicia. Spanish musicians have genius too. Well for those who have not heared of her more to their regret!
qsolkew01 2 years ago 2
He is a genius
todopor 2 years ago 3
his hands GRR.
my piano would kill me if i jumped like that xD
b4rocklegendx 2 years ago
he doesn´t even trie
stagesix6 2 years ago
mui bueno era este pianista esta cancion la compuso el genio
Ostirala 2 years ago
who transcribed this for piano?
kolb94 2 years ago