of course there was "some" other ethnicitys in the americas since way back when.. But all the natives here have a similar look... With huge populations!...we where here before the Ice age.. look it up Yup pre-clovis. and then some going back 50, thousand years.. read up the history its deeper.
mexica uprising dot net...and mexica-movement dot o rg...Please check out this site 2 find out your old Indigenous roots before the spanish names NIKAN TLAKA MESHIKAYOTL
Our laws are not being enforced anymore! We have been sold out to be invaded by illegal foreigners. It is time for the American people to take matters into their own hands in their communities. If you know of or see any illegals or activists throw rotten eggs at them on the streets and drive off. Secretly sabotage them, slash their tires, break their windows, cause them economic damage like they are causing us. You have to make life so miserable for them that they will leave!
Amerindians are the original peoples of the Americas, they are not immigrants. If somone refers to the Bering Straight then we can refer to any migration in human pre-history to say that Europeans, Asians, and others are not really where they are from. If America has always been a land of immigrants, why not Europe and Asia? Didn't their populators get there from somewhere elese some time in pre-history.
@al8392 Good point you made and to contradict would be insane. When the man in this video who is supposed to represent Squanto says to the "officer" nobody is a true native because of the Bereing Straight then Europeans are not native to Europe and Asians are not native to Asia, and so on, becuase of their ancestors' migrations. That means everyone (including Amerindians) should have the right to immigrate to Europe, Asia and anywhere in the world because nobody there is a true native either.
@al8392 Good point you made.. When the man in this video who is supposed to represent Squanto says to the "officer" nobody is a true native because of the Bereing Straight then Europeans are not native to Europe and Asians are not native to Asia, and so on, becuase of their ancestors' migrations. That means everyone (including Amerindians) should have the right to immigrate to Europe, Asia and anywhere in the world because nobody there is a true native either (except for Africa).
@al8392 Mainly because the researchers said the fossil found at Atapuerca in northern Spain, along with stone tools and animal bones, is up to 1.3 million years old. Discovered in a cave in Oregon, fossil feces yielded DNA indicating these early residents were related to people living in Siberia and East Asia, according to a report in edition of the journal Science. Where are you getting your information?
Saying that the Americas have always been a land of immigrants because Natives crossed the Bering Straigt is absurd. Such affirmation would be as ridiculous as saying Europeans are not really Europeans because some time in history their ancerstors immigrated to Europe. What about Asians, Australian aborigines and others. Did not their ancestors come from somewhere else? Are Chinese and Koreans immigrants to their own motherland because of their ancestors? Put like this, Amerindians are navites.
Saying that the Americas have always been a land of immigrants because Natives crossed the Bering Straigt is absurd. Such affirmation would be as ridiculous as saying Europeans are not really Europeans because some time in history their ancerstors immigrated to Europe. What about Asians, Australian aborigines and others. Did not their ancestors come from somewhere else? Are Chinese and Koreans immigrants to their own motherland because of their ancestors? Put like this, Amerindians are navites.
EVERY white country is told to be multicultural and multiracial. EVERY white country is forced to end its own race & culture. No one asks this of ANY non-white country. Mass Immigration & intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.
Anti-whites style themselves as anti-racist, but they want the elimination of only one race, my race, the white race. The true goal of anti-racism is to wipe out the white race.
Yes, the genocide of the Native Americans by the whites is definitely anti-white. Japanese internment camps to take their possessions were definitely anti-white. Chinese Exclusion Act was definitely anti-white. All the anti-latino laws in Arizona lately are definitely anti-white. Guess what, all of the aforementioned are "legal". Laws are not as black and white as you think they are. Otherwise the whole judiciary system would be unnecessary.
I don't understand why some people who support illegal immigrants are so down on the pilgrims.
First of all, the pilgrims weren't here illegally since the Indians didn't write laws about immigration. Next, the pilgrims were just like the Mexicans of today. They were only trying to better themselves and they did jobs the regular Americans of the time weren't doing.
"An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal... A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that ... had no part in enacting or devising the law... We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was 'legal' and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was 'illegal.'" -- Martin Luther King
"An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal... A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that ... had no part in enacting or devising the law... We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was 'legal' and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was 'illegal.'" -- Martin Luther King
There's always a grip of people who can't just sit back and be entertained... Always have to turn a comedy into a drama. Every culture has their good & bad, and anyone who says otherwise is foolish. Enough with the anti-these people or those people nonsense.
If you know of anyone who hires illegals, either a large or small company, call ICE 1 (866-347-2423. If you know any illegal who's working, get his name (if possible) and address and then call IRS Fraud Division 1 (800) 829-0582. If you live in CA you can write to the IRS Fraud Div. at Fresno, CA 93888. If you know of anyone who rents to illegals, call ICE, they are supposed to run background checks, some mgrs. are not doing it and our neighborhoods are dangerous.
The following is for all law abiding citizens who are unaware of this fact. The media keeps misusing the term CITIZENSHIP. This is totally wrong because NOBODY becomes a CITIZEN without first being a LEGAL RESIDENT. NOBODY!!! After 5 years or so, the LEGAL RESIDENT may APPLY for CITIZENSHIP. The illegal aliens and their supporters know the difference and they are trying to pull a fast one. Thought you would like to know.
I never understood the overt pride most Mexicans have. What is there to be proud of? The country is a shit-hole, which is why most flee it. Mexicans never invented anything significant, nor have they made any scientific discoveries. The most successful Mexican is someone of Arab lineage (Slim Helu). Mestizos have done nothing. I can see pride coming from Americans, Brits, Chinese, Indians, Greeks, Italians, French, etc. but what have Mexicans ever contributed to the advancement of humanity?
@TheTankinTortuga A shithole that white people decided to take with this manifest destiny. Why are you proud about being a racist scum bag? Then again you probably have no problem with being a racist scum bag.
There is a difference between advocacy & racism. Racism is about hate & superiority. Advocacy is about pride & self-interest. Non-white racism is always viewed as advocacy & white advocacy is always viewed as racism. I must defend & promote my civilization, culture and heritage. Anything less is a betrayal of the legacy my ancestors built & left to my. If you have a problem with that, it's your problem to deal with. Do something about it or stfu & fade back into obscurity.
@TheTankinTortuga You ancestors did genocide. And the only reason why white people in survived was the sole fact they "discovered" land that was already being farmed by the 'Savages". These savages showed white people how to farm PROPERLY. They EVEN showed them how to fight PROPERLY (American Revolution). What thanks do they get? Genocide, And a celebration honoring genocide. Be grateful for what you fucking have.
Typical comment from a libtard. Think before you post to your superiors from now on. We have a limited tolerance for stupidity but you're going far beyond your allotted quota. I'll privilege you & allow for you another chance to prove youself capable of intelligent thought.
This is comedy but for reality read the historical record of how the Spaniards then the Mexicans treated the Indians in California and other what are now portions of the southwest USA.
This is so historically wrong in many ways. First off the Indians didn't just "teach the white man how to grow just because he was nice". The deal was the Indians had beef with another tribe and they liked our weapons so together we drove them out there enemy.... Learn your history. Americans dont like having minorities lecturing us about shit they know nothing about....
@xxArmor4SleepRoxx Yeah, I suppose both my grandmother-in-laws and grandfather-in-laws who were born in Mexico are not Mexican. Their children who married and had my ex-wife I guess are also not of Mexican descent. I suppose my daughter who is 50% Mexican is also not qualified as Mexican.
I am not a Genius unfortunately. I was one point short on the IQ test. I only scored a 149. Perhaps that is why I only scored 1420 on my SAT.
Weird, I thought I saw some kind of Martian or something at my computer. Anyway, this video is amazing and you guys are amazing! Keep up the good work.
@youcantleaveDave It's not just the Mexicans. It's all of those filthy human creatures. Words can't even begin to describe how much I despise those cretins. I mean, just because they are bipedal and have average sized brains doesn't mean they're a superior species! They are ruining their planet just by existing, and the rest of us sapient beings shouldn't have to put up with them. Boycott the lot of 'em.
@LibertyObserver Rasmussen is widely regarded as biased to the right and the Pew polling questions need to be looked at to see the what is says about the prejudice people have toward immigrants.
@Averyofthemain well, I disagree, especially about Rasmussen, but even if we take the polling information to be true, it doesn't mean that Arizona anti-immigrant laws are just or fair.
If anything, I would look at that supposition and argue that clearly people's opinion of immigrants are warped by false information about immigrants, who they are and their place in our society.
Sometimes fighting for justice means winning over the majority opinion.
The anti-immigrant laws enacted fan the flames of hatred and prejudice.
Sb1070, ethnic studies ban, banning of teachers
with accents, the targeting of an elementary school
mural by because it depicts children of color, and now another bill being drawn up denying children born in the US of their citizenship if their parents are "illegal".
@gregwatanabe18mmw Why is it persecution to treat tresspassing of non-citizens as a crime. It isn't. Countries exist for a reason, as do borders.
And no, we shouldn't hate anybody, but hatred and enforcement of the law are two wildly seperate things, even the aggresive enforcement of laws cannot be whittled down to hatred.
@Averyofthemain It's persecution when a state passes laws that clearly target latinos.
I do think border security should be improved and the federal government should seek to do this.
The driving force behind these laws is racism and hatred of immigrants.
Stir up hatred and resentment of latino immigrants with tv, radio, pass a state law targeting latinos, enforce the law. All legal, but persecution nonetheless.
Pass a law to grant legal status to undocumented workers, enforce that
And yes of course they are "illegal, criminal invaders who have no respect for the constitution in the first fucking place." Wow, that is so freaking true! Because of course we should all respect the constitution when it has historically been the blessed document of our people that has represented all us Americans, including blacks who were all counted as 3/5ths of a person and Native Americans who weren't even counted as people at all! LAWS are ALWAYS RIGHT........NOT.
@filmhimstripher You are wrong. the 3/5 compromise did not assign human value, rather it said that on the basis of representation in congress, only 3/5 of the slave population could be counted, try your sophistry elsewhere.
If you research the native american prophecies, they all talk about the white people.,,and how everyone else will run to the seas to get the BEEP out of here....So to even make this point is uneducated...AHO.....
@xxArmor4SleepRoxx - If you are not a U.S. citizen then yes, you are illegal. America fought the native americans and won, it's that simple. Just like we fought Mexico and took California. We were at least nice enought o pay Mexico $15 million for the land and now they try to say we stole it? LOL, that's funny. We didn't have to give them shit, we won the war fair and square. Greedy ass lazy Mexicans.
@gregwatanabe18mmw - No one's worried about those who are here legally. We are talking about the one's who are here ILLEGALLY. Your statement is a common tactic used by the liberal left in which they try to combine legal and illegal immigrants in the same category to make illegals sound like they have a right to be here. 70% of the American people disagree with you so that type of statement doesn't work on Americans anymore.
@LibertyObserver Calling undocumented migrants "illegals" and calling for their prosecution ignores the reality that there are large immigrant communities living and working and positively contributing to the U.S. and whose undocumented status is, in part, due to inadequate policy.
@gregwatanabe18mmw - Calling illegal aliens "undocumented migrants" is hilarious. It doesn't matter what you think anyway, democrats and republican alike now want the border secured. 70% of Americans agree with Arizona's law and nearly 80% of Americans want the border secured and the ILLEGALS deported. We call that an "overwhelming majority." Look that definition up.
@xxArmor4SleepRoxx If you think "white people" are "racist" for wanting to enforce immigration law, then you are ignorant. Our immigration law is very lax compared to Mexico. Try illegally immigration there sometime and tell me what happens. My friends and family want illegal immigration stopped in this country. And guess what? Half of my family is Mexican, third and 4th gen, whose ancestors came here legally.
Wow. Fucking stupid. 400 years ago we did not have immigration law in this land. Now we do. Abide by it or we will enforce it. Simplistic fucking morons.
@purechaos2000 not every law created is just or even constitutional. Simply classifying immigrants as "illegal" is a gross oversimplification of the larger issue of immigration.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Name for me a single country that does not have immigration law. Illegal means you did not do the process, did not apply to legally come into that country according to it's laws. Yes, it is simple. You apply and either are accepted or rejected. If you decide not to follow the law and come here without authorization, then it is an illegal act. Immigration law is just and is constitutional, so your argument is not a very good one.
@purechaos2000 This country depends on immigrant labor in a number of industries. George Bush's 'guest worker' program is an example of something that recognizes that reality and gives a legal status to immigrants working here. This would've changed existing law to make it more just.
Arizona's new state law, sb 1070, is an example of an unconstitutional law.
Racism and hatred of 'the other' is often the driving force behind laws like these and must be protected against.
@gregwatanabe18mmw This country does not depend on illegal immigrant workers. We proved that in the 1950s with the ending of the Bracero program. If you support that notion, then you support the exploitation of people, and that is disgusting of you.
Name for me exactly what part of the AZ law is unconstitutional? As a former paralegal that has READ THE LAW, I tell you it is not unconstitutional.
As for racism, if you believe all illegals are Mexican, then it is you who are racist.
@purechaos2000 Karl Manheim of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles and Erwin Chemerinsky of UC Irvine Law:
The Arizona law appears to be ‘facially unconstitutional,’ Manheim said. ‘States have no power to pass immigration laws because it’s an attribute of foreign affairs. Just as states can’t have their own foreign policies or enter into treaties, they can’t have their own immigration laws either.’”
@gregwatanabe18mmw Nice way to drop a quote from an extreme leftist professor. Know why he is a professor? Because those can't actually do that work wind up teaching. Actually the 10th amendment gives AZ the authority to regulate immigration. Also, states that make laws that mimic and do not go outside the scope of current federal law are allowed to do so.
Better luck next time. Kind of sad you support exploiting people and also support the undermining of our laws.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Umm..How are they going outside the scope of federal law? See, you need to read the law as signed and amended, because you are simply going off what you have heard. What you have heard and what is real are two different things.
The AZ law is very clear. If you are suspected of committing a crime and cannot provide valid identification, you are detained and investigated. THE SAME THING HAPPENS TO CITIZENS RIGHT NOW IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ID!!! What is so hard to understand?
@purechaos2000 U.S. citizens don't have to carry proof of citizenship around with them. "Reasonable suspicion" of having committed a crime is subject to abuse.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Really? As a US citizen you do not have to have a valid ID and present it when you are suspected of a crime by law enforcement? REALLY? What state do you live in, because I wanna move there. Here in Texas as a caucasian male who was pulled over for doing 6 over the speed limit a day after having his wallet stolen had to go to the police station for identification. What is so wrong with carrying your ID, which is accordance with the law in every single state in the US??!
@gregwatanabe18mmw Dude.. That IS the Arizona law. If you are driving or suspected of a crime and cannot produce valid ID you get detained. If your identity cannot be determined or if there is a problem with the identification that comes up, then the AZ police can call DHS/ICE to verify if you are a citizen or not. If you are an illegal then they detain you for ICE to pick up. Same as if I have a warrant from another state or the feds. They detain me until they pick me up. That's it.
@purechaos2000 I think the bill gives a broad range of power to the police to determine reasonable suspicion. Crimes or suspicion of crimes could be anything: jaywalking, driving with a broken taillight. I think if police are mandated under penalty of a lawsuit if they don't enforce this law, they will make a determination that a person is illegal by looking at them and then look for an excuse to pull them over, detain or question of them.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Latinos won't be "targeted" by police. Know one reason why?? Over a third of the police in AZ are fricking hispanic! I have 2 uncles who have lived there all their lives. There is a HUGE hispanic population there that are LEGAL. Most hispanics who are LEGAL have no problem with the law.
You are doing two things. A. Supporting violating FEDERAL LAW and B. Allowing people to be exploited, because according to you our economy "depends" on them.
@purechaos2000 The fact a law enforcement officer is Latino, doesn't mean that the profiling still won't take place.
I don't support the violation of federal law. I advocate for a change in federal law that more humanely answers the difficult question of immigration.
I don't support the exploitation of anyone. All workers have rights and they should be protected.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Guess what? If you have such low opinion of law enforcement, then you have a bigger problem than worrying about illegal immigrants getting caught violating the LAW.
What is more humane than sending them back to their country of origin? YOu know how many countries make illegal immigrants do years of hard labor THEN turn them back to their country of origin??
Guess what? I am a legal citizen of the US. *I* have a right to protection against illegal foreign invaders. Get it?
@gregwatanabe18mmw Immigrant workers are not foreign invaders. ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS regardless of their working status (a number are career criminals and do not care about our law because they violated it to come here) are foreign invaders. Look up the definition of "invader". Here are a few deinfitions:
@purechaos2000 They're people. I think language like "invaders" is dehumanizing and serves the purpose of demonizing immigrants, focusing hatred on them and subjecting them, and U.S. citizens who look like them, to mistreatment and unfair treatment under the law.
@gregwatanabe18mmw I'm not demonizing immigrants. I am demonizing ILLEGAL immigrants. That is so hard for you people to understand the difference. Let me explain it to you. It is like the difference between a house guest you invite to stay over and someone who breaks in through a window uninvited. The invited one is OK the one broke the law. Period. The laws need to be enforced. The feds won't do it or do a piss poor job, so I am happy the states are doing it instead.
@purechaos2000 I think simply calling immigrants "illegal" oversimplifies the situation and is a way to label human beings to make it easier to resent and hate them.
This is why I think it is important to overhaul the immigration system so it's just, humane, and free from the rhetoric of hatred and fear of the "other".
@gregwatanabe18mmw I am not calling immigrants illegal. I am calling the ones who break the law to come to this country illegal. Pretty simple. If I do something against the law, then that action is illegal and I expect to suffer the consequences. How hard is this whole concept for people to grasp?
ID them, kick them the fuck out of the country, just like every other country on this planet does.
@purechaos2000 Not all immigration law is necessarily fair or just. Rather than solely focusing on enforcement of existing law or passing new state laws granting greater powers of enforcement, I advocate for an examination of the laws and for a focus on a solution which takes into account the great number of undocumented immigrants and their families living and working in and contributing to this country.
@gregwatanabe18mmw And that is fair to people who decided to do it legally, how exactly? Since we have so many murders, why not legalize murder, just this once? Since we have so many crimes going on, why not forget enforcing the law to ensure a fair and just society? What kind of message does that send? The same one we sent in 1986 when we tried that shit before?
Man, wish I could live that utopian fantasy world, but most of us have to live in reality. That is why the law will be upheld.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Anyway. I have to go t bed.. So I can get up get ready for the drive to work,. Which means I need to bring my wallet and driver's license that I obtained legally, then I have to abide by all the traffic laws on the way to work, then I have to go in and abide by the laws that make me not engage in public misconduct. All so i can make some money to support my family and pay my taxes to help support my community and support lazy people and illegal immigrants. Have a great night.
@gregwatanabe18mmw By the way do you even understand how the AZ law works? If you are suspected of committing a crime and fail to present valid ID, the officer can detain you to ID you. If anything reasonably suspicious comes up when IDing you, then they can check your immigration status with DHS/ICE. If you an illegal then they jail you until ICE picks you up. It basically lets them check immigration status similar to how you or I as a citizen is checked for warrants when pulled over.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Because you do not understand "reasonable suspicion". If I am coming out of a home, with a burglar alarm blaring, have a TV in my hand, a bandanna over my face, I look nervous, and drive off real fast... Is is not REASONABLE to SUSPECT I might be burglarizing a home?? "Reasonable suspicion" is the preface to "probable cause". BTW, they added in "probable cause" to the AZ law as well.
@purechaos2000 Ending the Bracero program is not proof that the U.S. depends on immigrant labor. There are simply more workers who are identified as "illegal".
The enforcement of sb1070 will result in racial profiling; Arizona police will target Latinos under the presumption they are "illegal" unless they prove otherwise.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Yes actually the ending of the Bracero Program proved dumb ass leftists like you cannot predict anything worth a shit. The left said that ending the Bracero program would wreak havoc on our economy and would double prices overnight at the market. We had a 4% increase in retail produce prices for 6 months. Big fucking whoop.
There are 4 different places in the AZ that specify outlaws racial profiling. If you think you are profiled, then FUCKING SUE.
@gregwatanabe18mmw Yes, agriculture continued to use "IMMIGRANT" labor, but they had to register using Form-151. Same as a modern day green card pretty much.
I cannot believe people actually want to still debate a FEDERAL LAW that is similar to every nation on the planet has and has been around in the US since 1790 and has been repeatedly amended to suit the needs of both immigrants and our citzen's infrastructure, though it has not been really enforced since the 1990s.
@gregwatanabe18mmw And if you think all these same canned answers I get from pro-criminals like you will change my mind on the subject, then you are wasting your time. I am one of the most vocal people in my city pushing FOR a law in Texas exactly like Arizona's. My extended family, who is 3rd and 4th generation Mexicans whose ancestors came here LEGALLY are also pushing for the law here, and we will get it done this fall.
@gregwatanabe18mmw By the way. We have a "guest worker" program already. It is called a H1B Visa. We do not need any more programs. What we need to do is fine, jail, and remove business licenses from people who knowingly exploit illegals by hiring them. We need to end welfare and public assistance unless you can prove citizenship. We need to identify illegals and put them in jail, then deport them afterward. If you think that is harsh or racist, then try going to Mexico illegally.
@gregwatanabe18mmw, you are so full of shit. As if Americans and legal immigrants can't do the work. There is nothing unconstitutional about deporting illegal, criminal invaders who have no respect for the constitution in the first fucking place. Take your liberal drivel and shove it some other place!
@gregwatanabe18mmw I want to also know something else. Why were you and others not jumping up and down in 2006 when Georgia put in SB529 which is the immigration enforcement act? Oh yeah, the media did not talk about it or hype it up. It has withstood constitutional scrutiny and it is similar to AZ's law and in some instances even more strict because it even goes after businesses! It also worked, and illegals fled from Georgia. Like I said, we can't wait to get it here in Texas too.
Interesting but I think you're missing the point of how countries gain land, power and sovereignty. The colonists had weapons and skills the natives didn't, therefore, we conquered the land. Simple. Same with Mexico and California. We took that too because we dominated Mexico. If Mexico wants it back or the natives want it back, let them fight for it the same way we did. I'm sure that will be a great success for Mexico, LOL!
@PaulPradaShow I don't subscribe to the idea of "might equals right". If I can take something from you or kill you because I'm more powerful than you, does that make it justified?
I think this sketch has more to do with the ideals we hold as individuals and as a nation and how those ideals translate to how we treat each other as human beings.
One point of this sketch is that some people use racist terms like "wetback" to denigrate and dehumanize immigrants; they're like us, human.
@gregwatanabe18mmw - Honestly, whether you subscribe to the idea of "might equals right" is irrelevant. That is human nature, that's how we as humans work, just like many other animals. Many other species fight to the death for land and territory. If no one fought over land, we wouldn't have countries, we wouldn't have technological advances, we wouldn't have different cultures. We would be a big, disorganized mess of people.
@gregwatanabe18mmw - If no one fought over land, the free market system, which is the basis for innovation, would not exist. There would be no space race between countries and no one would strive to invent or strive for exceptionalism. David Smith's book, Wealth of Nations has a good deal of info on this and was the basis for capitalism. I am a history and political science major so I know what I'm talking about.
Adam Smith, not David Smith, I'm getting him confused with David Locke. Societies like you're describing only work in a utopian setting which is impossible. People have tried it and it worked on a small scale of 20 people. Anything larger than that and it doesn't work. So no, I disagree that we could have innovation like we do today if everyone lived in one big country, no wars were fought and no fighting existed. Think of how many things were invented during times of war. Many, many things.
@LibertyObserver Even taking for a moment the hypothetical that war is 'good' for innovation, I don't think technological advancement is a good reason to go to war.
@gregwatanabe18mmw - Okay well then throw away your car, cell phone, electricity, computer, internet and any other technological advances you own since apparently you don't need them. Ya, that's what I thought.
@LibertyObserver I don't think it's okay to kill people, children, so we can have cell phones. I also don't think those things can only be discovered in times of war.
We need to kick out all 30+ million illegal invaders. They don't belong here and we cant afford to take care of them, our country is bankrupt and illegal aliens are major part of the bankruptcy, Mexifornia is a prime example of how illegal aliens destroy us.
If they are so good and hard working, they should work build their own countries. Illegals can go to hell, mexico is the same thing as hell, because they made it that way. They want to turn the USA into another third world latino shithole.
Yeah, it's a parody of the American people, American sovereignty, and the demands of the American people to have our government secure the border and deport illegal aliens. Actually, it's a mockery. And it's not funny.
There have been a few times where "Democrats" and "Republicans" switched roles.
The minorities (Black people) received the benefits of the "New Deal" & moved into the Dem. Party. Dem. party split into 2. One was full of Blacks and minorities and the other were the Whites who wanted no change. Thw whites made the move to the Republican party.
When Reagan (Republican) took office, the switch was final. And since then it was them who started the war. Or maybe they've been doing this along.
Reagan was a traitor to our country for giving amnesty to the illegals. Now the Democrats are trying to do it. Which goes to show that it's not a Party line issue, and the both Parties serve the same master: the New World Order agendists who are trying to destroy the sovereignty of the U.S. and to dissolve its borders. There was no such thing as law & order till the descendants of European setllers created a country.
You need to check your history. A Democrat president has led us into every major war of the last 100 years: WW I, WW II, the Korean War and Vietnam.
This video sucks. That joke about European settlers being "illegals" is getting old two lifetimes ago. And is untrue as well. How can anyone be illegal before a country was formed as the United States in 1789? Before that the land was "up for grabs" essentially. And 500 years ago anarchy ruled, and if a strong tribe took land from weaker tribes.
No, the U.S. started out as a former-colonial society. Most by then were narive-born descendants of immigrants.
And, no, native-born U.S. citizen are not hypocrites, since they treat immigrants here better than most other countrries, including Mexico. Besides that, you are NOT referring to immigrants anyway. You're referring to illegal alien INVADERS.
If you call them immigrants, then so too were the Nazis who invaded France in WW II.
No no no, we treat legal immigrants find. It's those that don't exist legally in our country that don't live the same...and we treat them quite well in comparison to illegals in any of their countries!
why are these guys not as famous as they should be?? Send there videos to all your friends, help them out
KoolJayJ 3 weeks ago
Funny. Thought provoking.
REMEMBERblackguitar6 2 months ago
No problem with immigrants, there are some smart and brilliant people out there.
But there is a problem with illegal immigrants.
Diversity make the US strong. Lawlessness does not.
Thieuanh 2 months ago
THUMBS UP IF YOU R WATCHING THIS ON THANKSGIVING DAY
XXXPrototypex86XXX 2 months ago 3
Europeans are not Indigenous to Europe either.
1coolguysuper 2 months ago
Loved the irony!
BestWayToLoseWeightH 2 months ago
of course there was "some" other ethnicitys in the americas since way back when.. But all the natives here have a similar look... With huge populations!...we where here before the Ice age.. look it up Yup pre-clovis. and then some going back 50, thousand years.. read up the history its deeper.
LPdANDYz 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mexica uprising dot net...and mexica-movement dot o rg...Please check out this site 2 find out your old Indigenous roots before the spanish names NIKAN TLAKA MESHIKAYOTL
LPdANDYz 3 months ago
BRILLIANT!!!
WolfRaven999 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Our laws are not being enforced anymore! We have been sold out to be invaded by illegal foreigners. It is time for the American people to take matters into their own hands in their communities. If you know of or see any illegals or activists throw rotten eggs at them on the streets and drive off. Secretly sabotage them, slash their tires, break their windows, cause them economic damage like they are causing us. You have to make life so miserable for them that they will leave!
bamlamnam 7 months ago
Holy shit 4:44 scared the shit out of me!
TheBencake 9 months ago
dtyuity
jrruff27 10 months ago
Amerindians are the original peoples of the Americas, they are not immigrants. If somone refers to the Bering Straight then we can refer to any migration in human pre-history to say that Europeans, Asians, and others are not really where they are from. If America has always been a land of immigrants, why not Europe and Asia? Didn't their populators get there from somewhere elese some time in pre-history.
al8392 11 months ago
@al8392 Good point you made and to contradict would be insane. When the man in this video who is supposed to represent Squanto says to the "officer" nobody is a true native because of the Bereing Straight then Europeans are not native to Europe and Asians are not native to Asia, and so on, becuase of their ancestors' migrations. That means everyone (including Amerindians) should have the right to immigrate to Europe, Asia and anywhere in the world because nobody there is a true native either.
MrSinaloense23 11 months ago
@al8392 Good point you made.. When the man in this video who is supposed to represent Squanto says to the "officer" nobody is a true native because of the Bereing Straight then Europeans are not native to Europe and Asians are not native to Asia, and so on, becuase of their ancestors' migrations. That means everyone (including Amerindians) should have the right to immigrate to Europe, Asia and anywhere in the world because nobody there is a true native either (except for Africa).
MrSinaloense23 11 months ago
@al8392 Mainly because the researchers said the fossil found at Atapuerca in northern Spain, along with stone tools and animal bones, is up to 1.3 million years old. Discovered in a cave in Oregon, fossil feces yielded DNA indicating these early residents were related to people living in Siberia and East Asia, according to a report in edition of the journal Science. Where are you getting your information?
bulrydrdan 6 months ago
Amerindians are the original peoples of the Americas, they are not immigrants.
al8392 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Saying that the Americas have always been a land of immigrants because Natives crossed the Bering Straigt is absurd. Such affirmation would be as ridiculous as saying Europeans are not really Europeans because some time in history their ancerstors immigrated to Europe. What about Asians, Australian aborigines and others. Did not their ancestors come from somewhere else? Are Chinese and Koreans immigrants to their own motherland because of their ancestors? Put like this, Amerindians are navites.
al8392 11 months ago
Saying that the Americas have always been a land of immigrants because Natives crossed the Bering Straigt is absurd. Such affirmation would be as ridiculous as saying Europeans are not really Europeans because some time in history their ancerstors immigrated to Europe. What about Asians, Australian aborigines and others. Did not their ancestors come from somewhere else? Are Chinese and Koreans immigrants to their own motherland because of their ancestors? Put like this, Amerindians are navites.
al8392 11 months ago
"Give me free! Give me freeeee!!!" hahaha*choke*choke*hahaha
Y'all are some hilarious asians. I love it.
habunami 1 year ago 3
illegal immigrant = illegal invader
EVERY white country is told to be multicultural and multiracial. EVERY white country is forced to end its own race & culture. No one asks this of ANY non-white country. Mass Immigration & intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.
Anti-whites style themselves as anti-racist, but they want the elimination of only one race, my race, the white race. The true goal of anti-racism is to wipe out the white race.
It is genocide.
NoWhiteGenocide 1 year ago
@NoWhiteGenocide
Yes, the genocide of the Native Americans by the whites is definitely anti-white. Japanese internment camps to take their possessions were definitely anti-white. Chinese Exclusion Act was definitely anti-white. All the anti-latino laws in Arizona lately are definitely anti-white. Guess what, all of the aforementioned are "legal". Laws are not as black and white as you think they are. Otherwise the whole judiciary system would be unnecessary.
You're confused, aren't you?
iMPERiOUS 1 year ago
@iMPERiOUS
What you are doing is attempting to justify the genocide of my people by saying we deserve it.
NoWhiteGenocide 1 year ago
@NoWhiteGenocide LOL iMPERiOUS just pwned you bro.
1coolguysuper 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't understand why some people who support illegal immigrants are so down on the pilgrims.
First of all, the pilgrims weren't here illegally since the Indians didn't write laws about immigration. Next, the pilgrims were just like the Mexicans of today. They were only trying to better themselves and they did jobs the regular Americans of the time weren't doing.
ReddNeckerson 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal... A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that ... had no part in enacting or devising the law... We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was 'legal' and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was 'illegal.'" -- Martin Luther King
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
"An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal... A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that ... had no part in enacting or devising the law... We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was 'legal' and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was 'illegal.'" -- Martin Luther King
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw That's why 0bamacare is going down like Monica Lewinsky!
ReddNeckerson 1 year ago
BULL SHIT!
Mikdeelo 1 year ago
@bboi2x not all immigrants are mexican or of "spanish" descent
timchiou 1 year ago
4:43 is a tad creepy...
xxxjustinrulesxxx 1 year ago
Soooo funny!! Hahaha!!
suzeemunkee 1 year ago
There's always a grip of people who can't just sit back and be entertained... Always have to turn a comedy into a drama. Every culture has their good & bad, and anyone who says otherwise is foolish. Enough with the anti-these people or those people nonsense.
Frostclaw 1 year ago
Whenever I hear someone ranting and raving about "illegal" immigrants I can't help but think, "The English?"
Jackstowne 1 year ago
nice. very nice. goes well with my ethnics class!
zuttodaisukidayo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you know of anyone who hires illegals, either a large or small company, call ICE 1 (866-347-2423. If you know any illegal who's working, get his name (if possible) and address and then call IRS Fraud Division 1 (800) 829-0582. If you live in CA you can write to the IRS Fraud Div. at Fresno, CA 93888. If you know of anyone who rents to illegals, call ICE, they are supposed to run background checks, some mgrs. are not doing it and our neighborhoods are dangerous.
imreallyclever 1 year ago
if it isn't ancient history, it's the race card, and there's always one who pulls the jesus card. Unbeleivable!!!
imreallyclever 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The following is for all law abiding citizens who are unaware of this fact. The media keeps misusing the term CITIZENSHIP. This is totally wrong because NOBODY becomes a CITIZEN without first being a LEGAL RESIDENT. NOBODY!!! After 5 years or so, the LEGAL RESIDENT may APPLY for CITIZENSHIP. The illegal aliens and their supporters know the difference and they are trying to pull a fast one. Thought you would like to know.
imreallyclever 1 year ago
yall crazy!!! this is some funny shit
reddhen 1 year ago
lol immigrant.
Snipermexi 1 year ago
lol love this shit !!
Blackjuicez 1 year ago
rofl.
rickylain 1 year ago
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION is not a new problem...Natives Americans use to call it WHITE PEOPLE.
MrCoverx 1 year ago 16
@MrCoverx LOL U MEAN THE WHITE MAN
bxfabolous 1 year ago
@MrCoverx Awesome!
redsiren100 5 months ago
@KKKSuperFan dude the azteck are way different then are history
go mexicans
mexicans 4 life
pacoimadumbass 1 year ago
@pacoimadumbass yeah they were definitely smarter
AZNSk8er4lyf 1 year ago
I never understood the overt pride most Mexicans have. What is there to be proud of? The country is a shit-hole, which is why most flee it. Mexicans never invented anything significant, nor have they made any scientific discoveries. The most successful Mexican is someone of Arab lineage (Slim Helu). Mestizos have done nothing. I can see pride coming from Americans, Brits, Chinese, Indians, Greeks, Italians, French, etc. but what have Mexicans ever contributed to the advancement of humanity?
TheTankinTortuga 1 year ago
@TheTankinTortuga A shithole that white people decided to take with this manifest destiny. Why are you proud about being a racist scum bag? Then again you probably have no problem with being a racist scum bag.
lifeismasked 1 year ago
@lifeismasked
There is a difference between advocacy & racism. Racism is about hate & superiority. Advocacy is about pride & self-interest. Non-white racism is always viewed as advocacy & white advocacy is always viewed as racism. I must defend & promote my civilization, culture and heritage. Anything less is a betrayal of the legacy my ancestors built & left to my. If you have a problem with that, it's your problem to deal with. Do something about it or stfu & fade back into obscurity.
TheTankinTortuga 1 year ago
@TheTankinTortuga You ancestors did genocide. And the only reason why white people in survived was the sole fact they "discovered" land that was already being farmed by the 'Savages". These savages showed white people how to farm PROPERLY. They EVEN showed them how to fight PROPERLY (American Revolution). What thanks do they get? Genocide, And a celebration honoring genocide. Be grateful for what you fucking have.
lifeismasked 1 year ago
@lifeismasked Well spoken
MrCoverx 1 year ago
@lifeismasked lol ur stupid. How to farm and fight lol! Thanks for the laugh.
sham7usa 1 year ago
@lifeismasked
Typical comment from a libtard. Think before you post to your superiors from now on. We have a limited tolerance for stupidity but you're going far beyond your allotted quota. I'll privilege you & allow for you another chance to prove youself capable of intelligent thought.
TheTankinTortuga 1 year ago
wow
pacoimadumbass 1 year ago
@KKKSuperFan are you stupid ? spain is more worth then mexico u dumbass where did you go to school? in the garbage can probably
EDEsouth 1 year ago
This is not peter chao!
HeadBangAllDay 1 year ago
This is comedy but for reality read the historical record of how the Spaniards then the Mexicans treated the Indians in California and other what are now portions of the southwest USA.
obbopp 1 year ago
Comment removed
SailorMelina 1 year ago
Comment removed
jilthil1 1 year ago 8
@jilthil1 you're exactly correct "P
toastedwaffle5 1 year ago
This is so historically wrong in many ways. First off the Indians didn't just "teach the white man how to grow just because he was nice". The deal was the Indians had beef with another tribe and they liked our weapons so together we drove them out there enemy.... Learn your history. Americans dont like having minorities lecturing us about shit they know nothing about....
dadecountyhustler305 1 year ago
Comment removed
SailorMelina 1 year ago
Loved the smallpox... LOL
JohnTheHater 1 year ago
wait a second, the pilgrims were Asian?
functfusion 1 year ago
FUCK MEXICANS!
DarceeEspelien 1 year ago
@DarceeEspelien no fuck you
mvargas27536 1 year ago
@DarceeEspelien Fuck YOU
luisoncln 1 year ago
Ridiculously F_U_N_N_y!!
I just might Bcome a Fan. Keep'em Coming. PRETTy Please*
NIKKEIsix 1 year ago
@xxArmor4SleepRoxx Yeah, I suppose both my grandmother-in-laws and grandfather-in-laws who were born in Mexico are not Mexican. Their children who married and had my ex-wife I guess are also not of Mexican descent. I suppose my daughter who is 50% Mexican is also not qualified as Mexican.
I am not a Genius unfortunately. I was one point short on the IQ test. I only scored a 149. Perhaps that is why I only scored 1420 on my SAT.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
Weird, I thought I saw some kind of Martian or something at my computer. Anyway, this video is amazing and you guys are amazing! Keep up the good work.
zorroazulapex 1 year ago
BOYCOTT MEXICO!!!!......it's one big shit hole of a countrythat they made a shit hole of a country, haha stupid beaners..............
youcantleaveDave 1 year ago
@youcantleaveDave It's not just the Mexicans. It's all of those filthy human creatures. Words can't even begin to describe how much I despise those cretins. I mean, just because they are bipedal and have average sized brains doesn't mean they're a superior species! They are ruining their planet just by existing, and the rest of us sapient beings shouldn't have to put up with them. Boycott the lot of 'em.
Repulsive mouth-breathers.
zorroazulapex 1 year ago
Smart and funny. This video needs to go viral it will help some people think.
TheUFOReport 1 year ago
@LibertyObserver Rasmussen is widely regarded as biased to the right and the Pew polling questions need to be looked at to see the what is says about the prejudice people have toward immigrants.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Rassmussen is no more biased to the right as Pew and Gallup are biased to the left
Averyofthemain 1 year ago
@Averyofthemain well, I disagree, especially about Rasmussen, but even if we take the polling information to be true, it doesn't mean that Arizona anti-immigrant laws are just or fair.
If anything, I would look at that supposition and argue that clearly people's opinion of immigrants are warped by false information about immigrants, who they are and their place in our society.
Sometimes fighting for justice means winning over the majority opinion.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw And what are the laws, exactly, let's examine them for justice:
1) Being in the country illegally is a state crime.
Just or unjust? I'd say just.
2) If a law enforcer has probable cause to suspect you are guilty of a state crime he has the right to make inquiries.
Just or unjust? Again, just.
That's the law boiled down.
Averyofthemain 1 year ago
@Averyofthemain @averyofthemain Not all laws are just. The intent of these laws is to scapegoat and target immigrants.
The anti-immigrant laws enacted fan the flames of hatred and prejudice.
Sb1070, ethnic studies ban, banning of teachers
with accents, the targeting of an elementary school
mural by because it depicts children of color, and now another bill being drawn up denying children born in the US of their citizenship if their parents are "illegal".
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw The intent of these laws is to target ILLEGAL immigrants, don't forget the operative word.
And what Hatred and prejudice, other than that of the underclass of an entire nation, which we cannot endure
how many poor can we accept, are we a black hole, that can drain the whole earth...a line must be drawn, would you call us racist for drawing it?
Averyofthemain 1 year ago
@Averyofthemain I think continuing to focus on the issue of immigration as an issue of law enforcement is a way of justifying a hatred of immigrants.
I don't think we should hate and persecute any class of people.
I think this nation is built upon the poor and huddled masses of other nations.
I think the resentment of immigrants is built of false notions of a perceived harm they are doing to our country.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Why is it persecution to treat tresspassing of non-citizens as a crime. It isn't. Countries exist for a reason, as do borders.
And no, we shouldn't hate anybody, but hatred and enforcement of the law are two wildly seperate things, even the aggresive enforcement of laws cannot be whittled down to hatred.
Averyofthemain 1 year ago
@Averyofthemain It's persecution when a state passes laws that clearly target latinos.
I do think border security should be improved and the federal government should seek to do this.
The driving force behind these laws is racism and hatred of immigrants.
Stir up hatred and resentment of latino immigrants with tv, radio, pass a state law targeting latinos, enforce the law. All legal, but persecution nonetheless.
Pass a law to grant legal status to undocumented workers, enforce that
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
brought to you by a race of people that boiled people alive for coming into there country300 yrs ago
blubuhda2000 1 year ago
@blubuhda2000 Cry some more, Blubbha. More complaints from illegal whites.
Dipstikk 1 year ago
And yes of course they are "illegal, criminal invaders who have no respect for the constitution in the first fucking place." Wow, that is so freaking true! Because of course we should all respect the constitution when it has historically been the blessed document of our people that has represented all us Americans, including blacks who were all counted as 3/5ths of a person and Native Americans who weren't even counted as people at all! LAWS are ALWAYS RIGHT........NOT.
filmhimstripher 1 year ago
@filmhimstripher move to china just as soon as you can
xyz223xyz 1 year ago
@filmhimstripher You are wrong. the 3/5 compromise did not assign human value, rather it said that on the basis of representation in congress, only 3/5 of the slave population could be counted, try your sophistry elsewhere.
Averyofthemain 1 year ago
@Averyofthemain I think that is an assignation of human value.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
This is a really HILARIOUS and SMART video. Great job!
filmhimstripher 1 year ago
Food beads?! you've been giving them food beads?!?!
shazam15 1 year ago
If you research the native american prophecies, they all talk about the white people.,,and how everyone else will run to the seas to get the BEEP out of here....So to even make this point is uneducated...AHO.....
SickOfTheLies1 1 year ago
@xxArmor4SleepRoxx - If you are not a U.S. citizen then yes, you are illegal. America fought the native americans and won, it's that simple. Just like we fought Mexico and took California. We were at least nice enought o pay Mexico $15 million for the land and now they try to say we stole it? LOL, that's funny. We didn't have to give them shit, we won the war fair and square. Greedy ass lazy Mexicans.
LibertyObserver 1 year ago
@LibertyObserver There are many non-citizens in residence in the U.S. "legally". Immigration law must be changed to be more just, humane.
Please don't use disparaging, racist language.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw - No one's worried about those who are here legally. We are talking about the one's who are here ILLEGALLY. Your statement is a common tactic used by the liberal left in which they try to combine legal and illegal immigrants in the same category to make illegals sound like they have a right to be here. 70% of the American people disagree with you so that type of statement doesn't work on Americans anymore.
LibertyObserver 1 year ago
@LibertyObserver Calling undocumented migrants "illegals" and calling for their prosecution ignores the reality that there are large immigrant communities living and working and positively contributing to the U.S. and whose undocumented status is, in part, due to inadequate policy.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw - Calling illegal aliens "undocumented migrants" is hilarious. It doesn't matter what you think anyway, democrats and republican alike now want the border secured. 70% of Americans agree with Arizona's law and nearly 80% of Americans want the border secured and the ILLEGALS deported. We call that an "overwhelming majority." Look that definition up.
LibertyObserver 1 year ago
@LibertyObserver It looks like you've drawn polling data from FAIR, which is founded by John Tanton, a racist.
A majority of people in Arizona support comprehensive federal reform of immigration over their own state law focused on enforcement.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw - Nope, this is polling data from Rasmussen and Pew polls, two of the most respected and neutral polling centers.
LibertyObserver 1 year ago
You guys crack me up... love this video!! 18MMW RULES!!!
drummergrrl73 1 year ago
@xxArmor4SleepRoxx If you think "white people" are "racist" for wanting to enforce immigration law, then you are ignorant. Our immigration law is very lax compared to Mexico. Try illegally immigration there sometime and tell me what happens. My friends and family want illegal immigration stopped in this country. And guess what? Half of my family is Mexican, third and 4th gen, whose ancestors came here legally.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
Wow. Fucking stupid. 400 years ago we did not have immigration law in this land. Now we do. Abide by it or we will enforce it. Simplistic fucking morons.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 not every law created is just or even constitutional. Simply classifying immigrants as "illegal" is a gross oversimplification of the larger issue of immigration.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Name for me a single country that does not have immigration law. Illegal means you did not do the process, did not apply to legally come into that country according to it's laws. Yes, it is simple. You apply and either are accepted or rejected. If you decide not to follow the law and come here without authorization, then it is an illegal act. Immigration law is just and is constitutional, so your argument is not a very good one.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 This country depends on immigrant labor in a number of industries. George Bush's 'guest worker' program is an example of something that recognizes that reality and gives a legal status to immigrants working here. This would've changed existing law to make it more just.
Arizona's new state law, sb 1070, is an example of an unconstitutional law.
Racism and hatred of 'the other' is often the driving force behind laws like these and must be protected against.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Testing to see if I can post this without errors (stupid YT).
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw This country does not depend on illegal immigrant workers. We proved that in the 1950s with the ending of the Bracero program. If you support that notion, then you support the exploitation of people, and that is disgusting of you.
Name for me exactly what part of the AZ law is unconstitutional? As a former paralegal that has READ THE LAW, I tell you it is not unconstitutional.
As for racism, if you believe all illegals are Mexican, then it is you who are racist.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 Karl Manheim of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles and Erwin Chemerinsky of UC Irvine Law:
The Arizona law appears to be ‘facially unconstitutional,’ Manheim said. ‘States have no power to pass immigration laws because it’s an attribute of foreign affairs. Just as states can’t have their own foreign policies or enter into treaties, they can’t have their own immigration laws either.’”
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Nice way to drop a quote from an extreme leftist professor. Know why he is a professor? Because those can't actually do that work wind up teaching. Actually the 10th amendment gives AZ the authority to regulate immigration. Also, states that make laws that mimic and do not go outside the scope of current federal law are allowed to do so.
Better luck next time. Kind of sad you support exploiting people and also support the undermining of our laws.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 I believe AZ is going outside the scope of federal law.
I don't support the exploitation of anyone, nor do I support the targeting of Latinos by law enforcement.
I don't support the undermining of AZ's laws unless the law seeks to deny equal protection to Latinos, or Asian Americans or anyone else.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Umm..How are they going outside the scope of federal law? See, you need to read the law as signed and amended, because you are simply going off what you have heard. What you have heard and what is real are two different things.
The AZ law is very clear. If you are suspected of committing a crime and cannot provide valid identification, you are detained and investigated. THE SAME THING HAPPENS TO CITIZENS RIGHT NOW IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ID!!! What is so hard to understand?
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 U.S. citizens don't have to carry proof of citizenship around with them. "Reasonable suspicion" of having committed a crime is subject to abuse.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Really? As a US citizen you do not have to have a valid ID and present it when you are suspected of a crime by law enforcement? REALLY? What state do you live in, because I wanna move there. Here in Texas as a caucasian male who was pulled over for doing 6 over the speed limit a day after having his wallet stolen had to go to the police station for identification. What is so wrong with carrying your ID, which is accordance with the law in every single state in the US??!
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 If you're driving or suspected of a crime, yes.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Dude.. That IS the Arizona law. If you are driving or suspected of a crime and cannot produce valid ID you get detained. If your identity cannot be determined or if there is a problem with the identification that comes up, then the AZ police can call DHS/ICE to verify if you are a citizen or not. If you are an illegal then they detain you for ICE to pick up. Same as if I have a warrant from another state or the feds. They detain me until they pick me up. That's it.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 I think the bill gives a broad range of power to the police to determine reasonable suspicion. Crimes or suspicion of crimes could be anything: jaywalking, driving with a broken taillight. I think if police are mandated under penalty of a lawsuit if they don't enforce this law, they will make a determination that a person is illegal by looking at them and then look for an excuse to pull them over, detain or question of them.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw I am sorry you distrust police that enforce the laws of the state.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Latinos won't be "targeted" by police. Know one reason why?? Over a third of the police in AZ are fricking hispanic! I have 2 uncles who have lived there all their lives. There is a HUGE hispanic population there that are LEGAL. Most hispanics who are LEGAL have no problem with the law.
You are doing two things. A. Supporting violating FEDERAL LAW and B. Allowing people to be exploited, because according to you our economy "depends" on them.
You are confused.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 The fact a law enforcement officer is Latino, doesn't mean that the profiling still won't take place.
I don't support the violation of federal law. I advocate for a change in federal law that more humanely answers the difficult question of immigration.
I don't support the exploitation of anyone. All workers have rights and they should be protected.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Guess what? If you have such low opinion of law enforcement, then you have a bigger problem than worrying about illegal immigrants getting caught violating the LAW.
What is more humane than sending them back to their country of origin? YOu know how many countries make illegal immigrants do years of hard labor THEN turn them back to their country of origin??
Guess what? I am a legal citizen of the US. *I* have a right to protection against illegal foreign invaders. Get it?
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 I don't think of immigrant workers as "foreign invaders".
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Immigrant workers are not foreign invaders. ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS regardless of their working status (a number are career criminals and do not care about our law because they violated it to come here) are foreign invaders. Look up the definition of "invader". Here are a few deinfitions:
To encroach or intrude on; violate.
To overrun as if by invading; infest.
To enter and permeate, especially harmfully.
They are are lawbreakers, period.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 They're people. I think language like "invaders" is dehumanizing and serves the purpose of demonizing immigrants, focusing hatred on them and subjecting them, and U.S. citizens who look like them, to mistreatment and unfair treatment under the law.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw I'm not demonizing immigrants. I am demonizing ILLEGAL immigrants. That is so hard for you people to understand the difference. Let me explain it to you. It is like the difference between a house guest you invite to stay over and someone who breaks in through a window uninvited. The invited one is OK the one broke the law. Period. The laws need to be enforced. The feds won't do it or do a piss poor job, so I am happy the states are doing it instead.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 I think simply calling immigrants "illegal" oversimplifies the situation and is a way to label human beings to make it easier to resent and hate them.
This is why I think it is important to overhaul the immigration system so it's just, humane, and free from the rhetoric of hatred and fear of the "other".
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw I am not calling immigrants illegal. I am calling the ones who break the law to come to this country illegal. Pretty simple. If I do something against the law, then that action is illegal and I expect to suffer the consequences. How hard is this whole concept for people to grasp?
ID them, kick them the fuck out of the country, just like every other country on this planet does.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 Not all immigration law is necessarily fair or just. Rather than solely focusing on enforcement of existing law or passing new state laws granting greater powers of enforcement, I advocate for an examination of the laws and for a focus on a solution which takes into account the great number of undocumented immigrants and their families living and working in and contributing to this country.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw And that is fair to people who decided to do it legally, how exactly? Since we have so many murders, why not legalize murder, just this once? Since we have so many crimes going on, why not forget enforcing the law to ensure a fair and just society? What kind of message does that send? The same one we sent in 1986 when we tried that shit before?
Man, wish I could live that utopian fantasy world, but most of us have to live in reality. That is why the law will be upheld.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Anyway. I have to go t bed.. So I can get up get ready for the drive to work,. Which means I need to bring my wallet and driver's license that I obtained legally, then I have to abide by all the traffic laws on the way to work, then I have to go in and abide by the laws that make me not engage in public misconduct. All so i can make some money to support my family and pay my taxes to help support my community and support lazy people and illegal immigrants. Have a great night.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw By the way do you even understand how the AZ law works? If you are suspected of committing a crime and fail to present valid ID, the officer can detain you to ID you. If anything reasonably suspicious comes up when IDing you, then they can check your immigration status with DHS/ICE. If you an illegal then they jail you until ICE picks you up. It basically lets them check immigration status similar to how you or I as a citizen is checked for warrants when pulled over.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 I think "reasonable suspicion" is suspect and subject to abuse.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Because you do not understand "reasonable suspicion". If I am coming out of a home, with a burglar alarm blaring, have a TV in my hand, a bandanna over my face, I look nervous, and drive off real fast... Is is not REASONABLE to SUSPECT I might be burglarizing a home?? "Reasonable suspicion" is the preface to "probable cause". BTW, they added in "probable cause" to the AZ law as well.
Have you ever worked in a legal capacity?
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 I think "reasonable suspicion" will be used to justify a demand to see "papers"; proof of citizenship or lawful residence.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 Ending the Bracero program is not proof that the U.S. depends on immigrant labor. There are simply more workers who are identified as "illegal".
The enforcement of sb1070 will result in racial profiling; Arizona police will target Latinos under the presumption they are "illegal" unless they prove otherwise.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Yes actually the ending of the Bracero Program proved dumb ass leftists like you cannot predict anything worth a shit. The left said that ending the Bracero program would wreak havoc on our economy and would double prices overnight at the market. We had a 4% increase in retail produce prices for 6 months. Big fucking whoop.
There are 4 different places in the AZ that specify outlaws racial profiling. If you think you are profiled, then FUCKING SUE.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 after the bracero program, agriculture continued to use immigrant labor, but they're denied legal status.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw Yes, agriculture continued to use "IMMIGRANT" labor, but they had to register using Form-151. Same as a modern day green card pretty much.
I cannot believe people actually want to still debate a FEDERAL LAW that is similar to every nation on the planet has and has been around in the US since 1790 and has been repeatedly amended to suit the needs of both immigrants and our citzen's infrastructure, though it has not been really enforced since the 1990s.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw And if you think all these same canned answers I get from pro-criminals like you will change my mind on the subject, then you are wasting your time. I am one of the most vocal people in my city pushing FOR a law in Texas exactly like Arizona's. My extended family, who is 3rd and 4th generation Mexicans whose ancestors came here LEGALLY are also pushing for the law here, and we will get it done this fall.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@purechaos2000 I understand your opinion won't be changed.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw By the way. We have a "guest worker" program already. It is called a H1B Visa. We do not need any more programs. What we need to do is fine, jail, and remove business licenses from people who knowingly exploit illegals by hiring them. We need to end welfare and public assistance unless you can prove citizenship. We need to identify illegals and put them in jail, then deport them afterward. If you think that is harsh or racist, then try going to Mexico illegally.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw, you are so full of shit. As if Americans and legal immigrants can't do the work. There is nothing unconstitutional about deporting illegal, criminal invaders who have no respect for the constitution in the first fucking place. Take your liberal drivel and shove it some other place!
thavoiceofreason 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw I want to also know something else. Why were you and others not jumping up and down in 2006 when Georgia put in SB529 which is the immigration enforcement act? Oh yeah, the media did not talk about it or hype it up. It has withstood constitutional scrutiny and it is similar to AZ's law and in some instances even more strict because it even goes after businesses! It also worked, and illegals fled from Georgia. Like I said, we can't wait to get it here in Texas too.
purechaos2000 1 year ago
Interesting but I think you're missing the point of how countries gain land, power and sovereignty. The colonists had weapons and skills the natives didn't, therefore, we conquered the land. Simple. Same with Mexico and California. We took that too because we dominated Mexico. If Mexico wants it back or the natives want it back, let them fight for it the same way we did. I'm sure that will be a great success for Mexico, LOL!
PaulPradaShow 1 year ago
@PaulPradaShow I don't subscribe to the idea of "might equals right". If I can take something from you or kill you because I'm more powerful than you, does that make it justified?
I think this sketch has more to do with the ideals we hold as individuals and as a nation and how those ideals translate to how we treat each other as human beings.
One point of this sketch is that some people use racist terms like "wetback" to denigrate and dehumanize immigrants; they're like us, human.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw - Honestly, whether you subscribe to the idea of "might equals right" is irrelevant. That is human nature, that's how we as humans work, just like many other animals. Many other species fight to the death for land and territory. If no one fought over land, we wouldn't have countries, we wouldn't have technological advances, we wouldn't have different cultures. We would be a big, disorganized mess of people.
PaulPradaShow 1 year ago
@PaulPradaShow I don't think we should necessarily aspire to acting like animals.
I don't agree with you that we wouldn't have technological advances or different cultures if no one fought over land.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw - If no one fought over land, the free market system, which is the basis for innovation, would not exist. There would be no space race between countries and no one would strive to invent or strive for exceptionalism. David Smith's book, Wealth of Nations has a good deal of info on this and was the basis for capitalism. I am a history and political science major so I know what I'm talking about.
PaulPradaShow 1 year ago
Adam Smith, not David Smith, I'm getting him confused with David Locke. Societies like you're describing only work in a utopian setting which is impossible. People have tried it and it worked on a small scale of 20 people. Anything larger than that and it doesn't work. So no, I disagree that we could have innovation like we do today if everyone lived in one big country, no wars were fought and no fighting existed. Think of how many things were invented during times of war. Many, many things.
LibertyObserver 1 year ago
@LibertyObserver Even taking for a moment the hypothetical that war is 'good' for innovation, I don't think technological advancement is a good reason to go to war.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@gregwatanabe18mmw - Okay well then throw away your car, cell phone, electricity, computer, internet and any other technological advances you own since apparently you don't need them. Ya, that's what I thought.
LibertyObserver 1 year ago
@LibertyObserver I don't think it's okay to kill people, children, so we can have cell phones. I also don't think those things can only be discovered in times of war.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
@PaulPradaShow I don't think it's true that if no one fought over land that a free market system wouldn't exist.
gregwatanabe18mmw 1 year ago
BRILLIANT!!! You are guys are so great.
tulancha 1 year ago
@Gulfporter Were you so caught up in historical correctness that you COMPLETELY and UTTERLY miss the point of the video?
iMPERiOUS 1 year ago
We need to kick out all 30+ million illegal invaders. They don't belong here and we cant afford to take care of them, our country is bankrupt and illegal aliens are major part of the bankruptcy, Mexifornia is a prime example of how illegal aliens destroy us.
If they are so good and hard working, they should work build their own countries. Illegals can go to hell, mexico is the same thing as hell, because they made it that way. They want to turn the USA into another third world latino shithole.
lickdacat2 1 year ago
Uh indians were immigrants too lol
oJKBo 1 year ago
@oJKBo from where
Snipermexi 1 year ago
@Snipermexi From asia
oJKBo 1 year ago
@holysh1tdubs
Yeah, it's a parody of the American people, American sovereignty, and the demands of the American people to have our government secure the border and deport illegal aliens. Actually, it's a mockery. And it's not funny.
Gulfporter 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is stupid. It has no relevance to today's legal system.
animatestate 2 years ago
There have been a few times where "Democrats" and "Republicans" switched roles.
The minorities (Black people) received the benefits of the "New Deal" & moved into the Dem. Party. Dem. party split into 2. One was full of Blacks and minorities and the other were the Whites who wanted no change. Thw whites made the move to the Republican party.
When Reagan (Republican) took office, the switch was final. And since then it was them who started the war. Or maybe they've been doing this along.
imagicnation 2 years ago
Reagan was a traitor to our country for giving amnesty to the illegals. Now the Democrats are trying to do it. Which goes to show that it's not a Party line issue, and the both Parties serve the same master: the New World Order agendists who are trying to destroy the sovereignty of the U.S. and to dissolve its borders. There was no such thing as law & order till the descendants of European setllers created a country.
TheresaAlways 2 years ago
its funny i like it.
and yes i makes a point
and you need welfare.
do you want to go back to seeing children starve no the streets
supervirgin 2 years ago
Well it was people of Eurpoean decent who made the United States the greatest country ever. Now thanks to Democrats that is all changing.
bestwin1 2 years ago
Sir it wasn't the Democrats who started your great phoney War. Hmm think about it baby.
kshabb 2 years ago
You need to check your history. A Democrat president has led us into every major war of the last 100 years: WW I, WW II, the Korean War and Vietnam.
This video sucks. That joke about European settlers being "illegals" is getting old two lifetimes ago. And is untrue as well. How can anyone be illegal before a country was formed as the United States in 1789? Before that the land was "up for grabs" essentially. And 500 years ago anarchy ruled, and if a strong tribe took land from weaker tribes.
tncdel 2 years ago
It shows that "European" America started off as an immigrant society, yet today they are hypocrites with the way they treat immigrants/refugees.
And no, it was not a Democrat president who led us into Iraq.
sinmagnion 2 years ago
No, the U.S. started out as a former-colonial society. Most by then were narive-born descendants of immigrants.
And, no, native-born U.S. citizen are not hypocrites, since they treat immigrants here better than most other countrries, including Mexico. Besides that, you are NOT referring to immigrants anyway. You're referring to illegal alien INVADERS.
If you call them immigrants, then so too were the Nazis who invaded France in WW II.
TheresaAlways 2 years ago
@sinmagnion
No no no, we treat legal immigrants find. It's those that don't exist legally in our country that don't live the same...and we treat them quite well in comparison to illegals in any of their countries!
TheHairReview 2 years ago
Comment removed
imagicnation 2 years ago
Thank the great leaders Nancy Pelosi and Kim Jong Il and the people who follow them.
koffiekpatcha 2 years ago