@refinedleigon You can't give a bad review, a review is a opinion about something. A opinion can't be wrong, you may disagree with reviewer. Just because they didn't like your favourite film, it doesn't make it the 'worst review ever'.
Pushing the Star Wars Prequel crap aside for a moment... I wanted to say that I actually liked Goldmember. It certainly wasn't as good as the first two, but I had a lot of "laugh out loud" moments and I enjoyed Micheal Cane as Austin's father. I really wish they'd made another movie with a stronger script and better jokes, though. That said, even _I_ felt the movie'd be too embarrassing to watch.. so I didn't.
Padmne and Obi Wan and Qui Gon: if serious an deep i dull, then realy there is more too caracters tha being Harriason Ford, not every caracter has to be a badass,.
To add to this the Sith/ darjksid were even vaguer in the OT, who tor what the Darksid was how you joined this, why the imperials regared th Force as syupid when they`er emperor was a Sith, none of it was explained. In the EU all they did was establush themas independent from the Jedi by giving them there own nsme. Soin fact in the PT we knew ione thing more, theur name.
*This should have been before the other comment, I just ran out of room* I must admit that I disagree on SOME movies that you've reviewed (say, The Lion King), but I listen to your opinion and take in your views. I have to agree with you on The Love Gury. It was not the best film I've ever seen.
You should try Dragonball Z the movie. Oh, My, God. People actually got up and walked out of the theatre. I was a Dragonball Z fan as a kid and *throws hands in the air* you know what? It was just awful. That's all I have to say.
@dragoness1202 DBZ movie. I didn't even contemplate seeing it. Why, because everybody young and old knew it was going to suck. Keep in mind DBZ is old by television standards. Even older of you include the book/manga/whatever the heck. It is a good series by anyone's account. Timeless - not stupid!
DUDE ITS A MOVIE RELAX PEOPLE ENJOY IT STOP MAKING PEOPLE SO NEGATIVE YOU SMARTASS "I dont really know what the joke about this movie was" OH SHUT UP "Mike Myers is better than this!" SHUT UP AGAIN YOU DICKHEAD " Gold-Member tanked.." "Justin Timberlake was funny!" (-------- Oh so you think hes funny don't you?! SHUT UP!!!
@scizotts well, im 16, and have seen great R rated comedies. this shit, a PG-13 comedy no less, never comes close to being funny. and, to make matters worse, it beat Disaster Movie for the Razzie Award. do you get the point im making?
16? Ratings? Razzies? Whose brain are you using? I get the point. You are too young to form an opinion by yourself without the RATINGS and RAZZIE GURU's. Most likely, your humorator has been programmed by what you grew up watching on TV. The reason I liked it has a lot to do with having grown up in the 60's when The Beatles brought us Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. So, all things being relative, you really have no context for the full enjoyment of all the gags, references, irony, etc. - 9 to 5 on sitar?
if you like the movie, that's great. that's ur own opinion, and no one could change that. however, dont tell us that "maybe your too young to get it". IT DOESNT MATTER IF WE DIDNT GROW UP IN THE 60s! the jokes still suck! people hittin each other in the face with piss-soaked rags is funny to you? a cross-eyed guru is funny to you? hell, the end scene with two elephants fuckin is funny to you? how fuckin old are you? and this isnt wat i base off the Razzie's, this is wat i actually saw and felt.
The problem with Austin Powers 3 was exactly the same as Love Guru: too many cheap jokes and a story that goes nowhere.
The original Austin Powers had some quite witty moments and parodied 1960s spy films well, but as the sequels rolled out the quality of the script nosedived.
Mike Myers ought not to do "franchises" at all, he'd be better off doing something fresh and original each time so that it doesn't stagnate.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this is a freaking awesome movie yall are retard this is amazing so mike myers ia great im sorry you dont have not since of humor it is really a pitty
You know, it's interesting that one of the key points you bring up is the question of "belief" in this material. To be sure, I'm certain Mike Myers did want to cement his position in the comedy world, for either money (say he puts it all in his nose) or for a sense of self-worth.
However, what is frightening is that Myers may well have taken the material, or at the very least the core principal behind it, VERY seriously. And I'm talking Chopra-esque, karmic interconnection seriously.
Am I still a layperson if I know both Deepak Chopra and Richard Dawkins?
P.S. I actually liked the South Park episode making fun of Dawkins even as a fan of his, and I normally loathe South Park's politics. Apparently, I am just weird.
It's not just the problem of finding people who know Deepak Chopra or Richard Dawkins, it's finding people who know them AND who watch your film/TV series AND who find the joke funny.
As Matthew says, that's only going to be a tiny proportion of your audience, especially if it's a comedy which depends in part on deliberately stupid sight gags.
Hey Matthew, you mentioned that your computer is dead. Is it your hard drive that's not working? Cause you could ideally take out your internal hard drive where you saved your files on, and place it into an external hard drive chasis so you can use it as an external hard drive and have access to your original files. I hope that helps any.
Mike Myers sucks! Guy isn't funny at all, and just recycles his gags....lame!
Plus he's a total whiner who won't get out of his trailer because he doesn't have his latte. The guy fired a prop worker for giggling while near him on this set!
The problem with Mike Myers, is the same problem with Eddie Murphy. They are both going thru the "wrestler" syndrome. They started out as nobody's, became big superstars, made alot of money and became household names, then their popularity started to fade and now they are both trying to stay in the spotlight by making movie after movie that turns into flop after flop. They need to stop (especially Murphy), retire from movies and live their lives with the money they have.
Psychomantle replied to my comment with "Stop nitpicking about little shit, you sound like a faggot." and then immediately deleted it. I can only assume he meant for just me to see the message, while no one else would know he's the type to use that word. Well, screw that, here his response can live for all time.
Richard Dawkins got mad because South Park made fun of him? Never knew that. I find it hard to believe when South Park continuously makes fun of Jesus, and I'm sure he gets a kick out of that. Seems very hypocritical with him and with the certain christians who suddenly jumped on SP's band wagon.
He said that people who liked Richard Dawkins got mad, which I find hard to believe. They showed Dawkins to be a smart guy, which he is. And Richard Dawkins isn't obscure, what kind of retard hasn't heard of Richard Dawkins?
Not everyone is a basement dwelling douchebag who read books for the trendy pseudo intellectual. Who hasn't heard of Richard Dawkins? More like, who gives a fuck about Richard Dawkins?
-when you don't understand a comedy. People outside the US actually look down for the most part on the idea you have of 'undersanding' comedy outside your own country.
I've not watch 'the love guru' simply because I knew that I wouldn't find it funny, just like I've not seen Hostel/a haunting in connecticut because I know I'll dislike them. Try poking at the actual points that make it 'a bad movie' instead of complaining you didn't get it.
Y'know, that's the problem with Americans in general when it comes to comedy, as long as you don't try to understand a joke, it's going to shoot right over your heads, I remember sitting in a New York Cinema, watching Munich for the firest time and seeing the whole place literally roar with laughter when the main guys daugfhter say's 'daddy' for the first time and he cries.
What Americans need to do is try to have a more mature comedy, few sitcoms, etc do that and its small of you to critisize-
BTW. It kind of blows my mind Confused Matthew posted just 20 minutes ago. If your listening I'd like to say that youre a great reviewer and were all dying to find out what youre worst movie of all time is
Stand in Stan said it was 1- Meet the Parents followed by 2- Wedding Crashers. I'd have to disagree. Epic Movie is not only 0 percent funny, but just plain disgusting
Ask the first twenty people you see on any given day if they have ever heard of him.
I did this today at work. I didn't get to twenty, but I asked twelve: seven co-workers and five customers. Of those twelve, zero people knew who he was.
That's hardly a test of obscurity, most people are not educated and wouldn't know who Carl Sagan, Michio Kaku, or Steven Hawking are, either.
Obscure people are not 7 time New York Times Best Selling authors. Obscure means "not prominent or famous", which is hardly a fitting adjective for Dawkins, one of the most famous scholars of our age.
@confusedmatthew Hey could I discuss the Star Wars prequels with you and Stand in Stan threw wabcam when I have the technology necassery, because I am a huge defender of the Star Wars prequels and I would like to explain a lot to you and clear up some of your confusion.
@reviewreviewer1 I watched the prequels again after watching reviews from two different online critics. They were right about the plot holes. There were 'a lot' of holes.
Make a review video then and post it on youtube. It would be unique, as the rest of us think these are objectively bad movies, and get a lot of views.
@mst3k4evur Oke I am working on it, but it wil take a lonf whie cause I will have to read all SW cabon and watch more movies, also I am working on a rating system and am still very very sick.
You don't really need to read any cannon. You are reviewing the movies, just watch them. Books outside of the movies can only cloud your opinion. In fact, they may be responsible for your liking the movies, given that the books explained so much that the movies left out. That makes the books good, not the movies.
@mst3k4evur In fact I saw all six movies 8 times, and some more, before I ever even heard of the EU, I kmnow I am gonna review the movies, but reviewing them without the other caanon would be like reviewing Emmpire without having seen Hope. It would be an incorrect thing to do.
No, seeing Hope makes sense because it's another movie. Besides, how does a review that includes a whole lot of EU information from books, comics and videogames help if most people are unfamiliar with them?
@mst3k4evur Well first of all many peopl e lknow the EU, second the rule of franchises is is that all material aproved by the owner as canon is part if the fictuional universe and also that someone can continue his or hwer story threw forms pf other medua, something tjhhat often happens. I don`t think I can make up my own rule that only the movieds count, it would be like reviwewing ST films without havig seen the series, please respond???
Actually, you should review the Star Trek movies without having to refer to the tv series. I loved the movies, but have only seen a few episodes of the original series.
Look at it this way, why should I have to wait years and have to buy a series of books just to understand a movie? Shouldn't they have made the movie clearer and provided more information.
You get no extra points for the movie for the info you left out.
@mst3k4evur Well the thing is that the SW EU is a long and complex mythology and I want o read it in order, so I know if the movie contradict them, cause continuetyerrors, means a nmovie loses a few points, also I dind most o the books very interesting. please respond???
First, it's hard to respond when your spelling and grammar are this bad.
Second, I love the books (I recommend the Tales of the Jedi comics and the Republic Commando novels) but reading them is not NECESSARY to evaluate the movie. If there is info in the books that explains huge gaps in the Movie, then that means the movie should have provided the information. If it contradicts some remote EU piece very few have read, then that is also unimportant.
@mst3k4evur Sorry for the bad spelling. Second irt`s tru they shouldn`t explain big gaps, but they explain some small gaps, that were i th movie case it was alread explained in the EU. Alsoit is true that if it contradicts a small EU piece that isn`t ery important, but it is atleast a bit, I interested in the intire mythology and how the prequels hold up in that, if they work well with it and if Lucas manaed to stay loyal to his fans. please respond/??
First, they should explain the gaps, but it should be done in the movies.
Second, Lucas DIDN'T stay true to the fans. The prequels contradicted the original movies and EU in many places. But that's not really the issue. These movies shouldn't be judged because they violated the cannon, even if that violation pisses me off, they should be judged on dialogue, plot and characters--all of which sucked.
@mst3k4evur Hey funny I read this now, cause I was just reading abut the Live action SW series. Second: I agree movies should be pretty sytand alone, but not way more than tjhey swquels should stand alonbe, movies are alliowed to vbe follow ups to orther media, and although the EU i B con it still ccounts. So must of the stuff should be explained un the movies, bt some SMALL things not. I made the rule they are allowed to rely 50 % ,(of the ammount they rely on eachother), the can rely on the EU
@mst3k4evur Continued, mention which contradictiobns. Fourth I agree movies should be judged based on caracters, plot and dialogue, but also on canon violation, if you make a sequel/ oprequels and relwease it such, it will be judged first and foremost as a film, a secomd as a part of the franchise. I agree caracters an dialogue, come first but the second does matter, main eexample being T3 I think the movies was a finger to Cameron and give it many poibnt dwn, for thatt, but it still rocked.
@mst3k4evur Continued. Oke wwell mking mt review will tak a while, but I CAM give a stomg and well thoughout defence right now. So bring it on!!! WAAA just kiddibng, not but bring up tyour complains and I will counter them. please respond?????????
Characters: Either very underdeveloped and explained(Darth Maul and Dooku), unlikable and annoying (Anakin, Jar Jar, Yoda) or dull (Obi Wan, Quigon, and Padme)
Dialogue: Awful in all three. It's uncomfortable, awkward and annoying. Any speech is long and boring.
CGI: Too much of it and what there is is cluttered, making the scene confusing. Other times it's so exagerated and silly. Less is more.
@mst3k4evur Oke first of all Dooku was totally explained, he was an e Jedi,, who had left the order ad who had heavy political ambiytions, and eventualy ende up joining the Darkside and turning, evil andthen tried to follow this aambiyoins qith the Seperatist. He is also bvery vengefull and angry at the Jedi and constantkly wa too prove he has becom strionger then them, he has also becom a cold murdderer, but aometimes he has short moments of sympathy for his old friends to be continued..
@mst3k4evur He was also the master of Qui Gon and due to this has a special amvbition ro get Obi Wan to join him. Anakin was very likeable, ghe truely cared for Padme and his mom and even tried to b a good aprentice to Obi Wan and only aced frustrated ab angry when Obni Wan started to patronise, him for no reason, Obi Wan mistreated hi, also don`t forget Luke was whiny too. Also h truely cares for soiet and is a brave Jedi and fought bravely i in the Clone War agsinstDooku the asain etc..
Plot: It's incomprehensible throughout the three films.
No info about the origin or nature of the Sith. This is even worse because the third movie is Revenge of the Sith and we don't know who the Sith are or why they want revenge. (credit to CM)
The characters act in illogical and stupid ways purely because the plot needs them to.
Palpatene's betrayal was obvious. Yet no one figured it out. Nor did anyone follow up on Maul or go to Nabu to capture him.
@mst3k4evur Oke a few things, foirst off the Sith are of the few unexplained ciobncepts in the PT and that is oke becauase they are mostly pylibng string iun th bacjgrounf. They do explain the things that matter, the politics seperatisr crisis, the Clone story etc, and they do itrosuce the important caracters, rthe Sith wre explaine d in the EU, and one of th few EU elements ehicjh were used in the films most of the pre PT EU did mothing for thetroilogy, accept for the Sith.
The Trade federation: Everything. Their organization, motivation and plans are baffling. Who were they, what did they want and how would attacking Nabu benefit them?
Romance: Awkward, forced and boring. Just terrible.
Seperatists: How were they villains? They just wanted independence.
Gen. Grievous: A cartoon super villain robot with asthma. Need I say more?
I'm rambling, for a more complete argument check Redlettermedia and CM.
@mst3k4evur Romance: uh it should nbe akard they are young, forced why, boring if you think caracterdevelopment is boring then..
Seperatosts no, THEY WERE NOT JUST TRYING TO LEAVEE read thr opening scroll: they were making it dificult for the Jedi to maintain peace and order, they were atracking the republic and raisinfg there ow armies in an attemp to plunder and start thei own empire. Generl Frievous: the Joke ned I say more.
@mst3k4evur Also I would lik to ad the Jedi weren`t even trying to stop the Seperarists from leavingm, thwy wnted to form an army to be assisted in defending the republi against the atrAack, and they feared if theu couldn`t get the sepweratists t stay the woul atachk them even more, wha iswhat often happens, espivcial considering they consstet from corrupt evil asholls, and theeey were asemnlig othrers too joi them, they wanted to builyt an empire..
The jedi formed and led a Republic Army before the Separatists had attacked them. Then, they infiltrated the Separatist base. Then, they attacked the Separatists. That makes it look like the Separatists were defending themselves.
They weren't forming an empire, but a coalition of various species and robots. In fact these nations seemed to be poorer, smaller and more rural than the Republic.
@mst3k4evur Uh the Jedi started using theuir armies for attack, when they had heard from the leaders of the seperatists themselves, that they were planning to attack them, all they did was using attack as the best defence, they heard the sepreratusts wer planning on blackmailing them and forcing demands on them. Maybe they didntt want t form an emnpire, bu they wrre seeking powet, they started tacking the republivc and wanted armies to blackmsil the republic. That is evil, the Jedi just defend.
No, they formed the army before Dooku states he wanted to attack the Republic. EVen then, he said he wanted to leave the Republic because it was under the control of a Sith lord.
What demands? If it's a demand for independence, then that is not evil. If you read the EU, systems are allowed to leave the Republic.
Once again, wanting to leave the Republic, forming an army and fighting the Republic when they were attacked are all legal.
@mst3k4evur Oke first of all creating army, do you have one is case your attacked s not bad at all. Also the Clone Army wasn`t lealise or turned into a standing army yet. Dooku also memtioneed he waNTED to blavcmil the reublic aND the story about Sdeous was a means to get Obi Wan too join him. Uh ant demands the woul make, they werre plannin on veryrowin D blackmailin the reoublic. They dudn`t form an army a means of defwnce, they announced they were leavng and then starte ttackng the republic..
Yes but they only establish that the Separatists are planning extortion and invasion AFTER Mace Windu establishes that the Jedi will fight to keep the Separatists within the Republic. These are Jedi's who won't fight to free slaves, defeat the Hutts or crime. These same Jedi in the EU banned their Jedi Knights from fighting the Mandalorians, who enslaved worlds and committed genocide. But when they have no more info than the Separatists are leaving, they jump to form an army.
@mst3k4evur No Mace Windu said there ouldn`t be enough Jedi to protect the ereopublic, they weren`t planing to fight for it, a al. They fered that te seperarist were planig a war, which mskes sense case they were attacking themfro the beinning iof the film, tremmembe the opening they were making it dificult for them to msintsin peace ad order, so they were atytacking them, so uit is logical to asume that whe tjhey realygform their own nation their attacks will icrease.
@reviewreviewer1 "contradicts a small part"? umm.... that small part youre speaking of, IS WHAT STARTED THE STARWARS SAGA!!!! im huessing youre likeidk, eight?
@reviewreviewer1 "contradicts a small part"? umm.... that small part youre speaking of, IS WHAT STARTED THE STARWARS SAGA!!!! im huessing youre likeidk, eight?
I dunno about you saying that no one could have found that funny, and they were too late into production- Jason friedburg and Aaron Seltzer think their work is classic comedy.
It's just Watchmen, no "the!" Hopefully that was just a screwup caused by this not being scripted, as people who add a "the" to the title really annoy me. There's no faster way to tell someone doesn't really care about the novel.
i fucking hate watchmen, it was slow confusing and everything was irrelevant to the plot. go ahead matthew bash on it all you want. you'll finally review something that i also dont like
I laughed hysterically at the south park episode mocking Richard Dawkins , The best part was seeing him Cornhole Mrs Garrison and then find out over the telephone the women he was in the middle of fucking was really a man.
I'm glad you guys can see why Meet the Parents is supposed to be funny. Being in those kind of families makes it a good situational comedy, and the numbers do add up obviously.
I don't doubt you. I was just surprised that he wasn't well known based on what you said about the South Park forums. As for the movie, I didn't think it looked good. This review confirmed it and maybe saved me from watching it. Good luck getting your files back!
dude, you really need to chilax. Just because he might not agree with you or like a movie that liked doesn't mean you should bash him for it or even threaten him in that matter.
this movie was funny as shit. All you guys have no sence of humor
BEATLESRAWSOME97 3 weeks ago
Hitch
Dumbass edition
mrwhippy101 1 month ago
my wife rented this movie a few weeks ago man this movie sucked ass!!!!!!!
that was the last time i let her go to the video store alone
timstarr28 9 months ago
@confusdedmatthew, do you have any issus with the big lebowski?
johnkiedis27 10 months ago
Thisreview is great... A+!
Minyositine 11 months ago
wow this is my favorite movie and the worst review ever thank you for when or if i start reviewing thank you for showing me not how to make a review
refinedleigon 11 months ago
@refinedleigon LOL u butt hurt
frantheman180 11 months ago
@refinedleigon You can't give a bad review, a review is a opinion about something. A opinion can't be wrong, you may disagree with reviewer. Just because they didn't like your favourite film, it doesn't make it the 'worst review ever'.
totallyirreverent 8 months ago
What´s wrong about "Meet the parents"? I find it funny.
VitoPossilipo 1 year ago
@VitoPossilipo Me too, but you can't expect everyone to like though.
totallyirreverent 8 months ago
Waste of semen.
Triperiokstas 1 year ago
Your reviewing style sucks. You suck over all. Except some of the starwars review.
The ones you were sarcastic. PS you suck
inpoint55 1 year ago
@inpoint55 So youre saying he sucks?
grandtheftauto5555 1 year ago
Pushing the Star Wars Prequel crap aside for a moment... I wanted to say that I actually liked Goldmember. It certainly wasn't as good as the first two, but I had a lot of "laugh out loud" moments and I enjoyed Micheal Cane as Austin's father. I really wish they'd made another movie with a stronger script and better jokes, though. That said, even _I_ felt the movie'd be too embarrassing to watch.. so I didn't.
HiroshiMizushima 1 year ago
SURE! Let's have a Star Wars debate in a The Love Guru review! I applaud you all!
NkR03 1 year ago
And they were planning to backmai them.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
Padmne and Obi Wan and Qui Gon: if serious an deep i dull, then realy there is more too caracters tha being Harriason Ford, not every caracter has to be a badass,.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
To add to this the Sith/ darjksid were even vaguer in the OT, who tor what the Darksid was how you joined this, why the imperials regared th Force as syupid when they`er emperor was a Sith, none of it was explained. In the EU all they did was establush themas independent from the Jedi by giving them there own nsme. Soin fact in the PT we knew ione thing more, theur name.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
THIRD least funny movie Stan has ever seen? Now I'm curious what the other two are.
JamesOhGoodie 1 year ago
@confusedmatthew ohhhh. i knew who he was
Rapter57 1 year ago
Confusedmatthew, you should really review
1. The Last Airbender
2. The Dark Knight
3. The foot fist way
And please show us what you look like!
UncleFerdinand 1 year ago 2
Goldmember made $297 million at the box office on a budget of $63 million, how the fuck is that tanking?
Powderwombat 1 year ago 17
@Powderwombat Did you include the post-production expenses.
unytcommsys 1 year ago
*This should have been before the other comment, I just ran out of room* I must admit that I disagree on SOME movies that you've reviewed (say, The Lion King), but I listen to your opinion and take in your views. I have to agree with you on The Love Gury. It was not the best film I've ever seen.
dragoness1202 1 year ago
You should try Dragonball Z the movie. Oh, My, God. People actually got up and walked out of the theatre. I was a Dragonball Z fan as a kid and *throws hands in the air* you know what? It was just awful. That's all I have to say.
dragoness1202 1 year ago
@dragoness1202 DBZ movie. I didn't even contemplate seeing it. Why, because everybody young and old knew it was going to suck. Keep in mind DBZ is old by television standards. Even older of you include the book/manga/whatever the heck. It is a good series by anyone's account. Timeless - not stupid!
unytcommsys 1 year ago
Shrek = $.
Sonicmountain09 1 year ago
Is the Love Guru Movie review by confused Matthew & stand stan part 1 died?
greene64 2 years ago
@clonecomanderfox
ok you liked the love guru that doesnt mean you can say things like:
RUSSIA WILL BOMB the US
ok why will they bomb the US and you said this is canadian humor ok well why was it made in america.
you have a right to youre opion but if something isnt funny to a whole nation than youre on minorty
i have a canadian friend and he said he hated love guru so that kind defeats the agument of it canadian humor.
chris7000xxx 2 years ago
Everybody agrees. "Love Guru" sucked. Move on to the next film.Clear your frigging throat ,Stan.
globbo100 2 years ago
I think it's time to start a dump "Stand in Stan" Campaign.Clear your frigging throat Stan.
globbo100 2 years ago
I LOVE the way you review. The way you say your opinion exactly as you think it, and without necessarily joking, but just saying it earnestly.
Love this review.
AtariMaxiToriyama 2 years ago
DUDE ITS A MOVIE RELAX PEOPLE ENJOY IT STOP MAKING PEOPLE SO NEGATIVE YOU SMARTASS "I dont really know what the joke about this movie was" OH SHUT UP "Mike Myers is better than this!" SHUT UP AGAIN YOU DICKHEAD " Gold-Member tanked.." "Justin Timberlake was funny!" (-------- Oh so you think hes funny don't you?! SHUT UP!!!
This whole video is this asswholes opinion.
TheMoipl5productions 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What the FUCK are you talking about? The movie was hilarious. Maybe you are too young to get it.
scizotts 2 years ago
@scizotts well, im 16, and have seen great R rated comedies. this shit, a PG-13 comedy no less, never comes close to being funny. and, to make matters worse, it beat Disaster Movie for the Razzie Award. do you get the point im making?
DarkProphet94 2 years ago
16? Ratings? Razzies? Whose brain are you using? I get the point. You are too young to form an opinion by yourself without the RATINGS and RAZZIE GURU's. Most likely, your humorator has been programmed by what you grew up watching on TV. The reason I liked it has a lot to do with having grown up in the 60's when The Beatles brought us Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. So, all things being relative, you really have no context for the full enjoyment of all the gags, references, irony, etc. - 9 to 5 on sitar?
scizotts 2 years ago
if you like the movie, that's great. that's ur own opinion, and no one could change that. however, dont tell us that "maybe your too young to get it". IT DOESNT MATTER IF WE DIDNT GROW UP IN THE 60s! the jokes still suck! people hittin each other in the face with piss-soaked rags is funny to you? a cross-eyed guru is funny to you? hell, the end scene with two elephants fuckin is funny to you? how fuckin old are you? and this isnt wat i base off the Razzie's, this is wat i actually saw and felt.
DarkProphet94 2 years ago
You know, UR right. My opinion. So FUCK YOU and YOURS, baby boy! HA!
scizotts 2 years ago
"My brother and me."
You and your brother are both the Object of that sentence.
Williamsfan 2 years ago
who gives a fuck?
blueangel0394 2 years ago
Twee people.
Williamsfan 2 years ago
hey i liked goldmeber
grandtheftauto5555 2 years ago 2
Uhh...now I know why this guy is called "Confused Matthew"; Goldmember didn't tank, guy...it actually won five awards and earned almost $300M.
The rest of the review speak the truth, though.
SirGomezAdams 2 years ago 2
He meant that it "Tanked" for him, meaning he didn't like it.
Kratos87Fan19 2 years ago
Oh, in that case, fine. He shoulda probably thrown in the "for me" part, though, then I would of gotten it.
SirGomezAdams 2 years ago
The problem with Austin Powers 3 was exactly the same as Love Guru: too many cheap jokes and a story that goes nowhere.
The original Austin Powers had some quite witty moments and parodied 1960s spy films well, but as the sequels rolled out the quality of the script nosedived.
Mike Myers ought not to do "franchises" at all, he'd be better off doing something fresh and original each time so that it doesn't stagnate.
finnobrit1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is a freaking awesome movie yall are retard this is amazing so mike myers ia great im sorry you dont have not since of humor it is really a pitty
chicwogirl 2 years ago
losing his touch!? hes only 46!! he still has a ways to go.
Ewing5150 2 years ago
it made me laugh! and some points were true
i dont think mike myers was making fun of deepak i think he admires him
AQUAMARINETMI 2 years ago
actually goldmember made over 200 million in profits
MrTraitorX 2 years ago
very good review.. lol.. keep it up guys. And yes i repeat it again: WE NEED BETTER SCRIPT IN MOVIES TODAY!
emasterg2 2 years ago
he looks like jack black in that picture
potatoelover95 2 years ago
Thanks, you two, for letting me know about the horrors of this heck of a film!
I hope your computer gets fixed real soon, Matthew. But don't worry too much about it, cuz your reviews are still awesome. ^-^
UltimateSpidergirl 2 years ago
You know, it's interesting that one of the key points you bring up is the question of "belief" in this material. To be sure, I'm certain Mike Myers did want to cement his position in the comedy world, for either money (say he puts it all in his nose) or for a sense of self-worth.
However, what is frightening is that Myers may well have taken the material, or at the very least the core principal behind it, VERY seriously. And I'm talking Chopra-esque, karmic interconnection seriously.
abridgedfanboy 2 years ago 2
the name of the girl from law and order svu is mariska hargitay, i luv svu. its a good show
ttaggart12345 2 years ago
Before I even watch this, I'm going to give my opinion on the film.
It's Austin Powers, except this time he's Indian and he isn't funny.
yoyojumpy 2 years ago 30
ur the the best damm movie critic ever
ohyland 2 years ago
Aw, that's a shame. My computer has copped it too and I'm forced to use my sisters laptop D:
jakerockznoodles 2 years ago
thaj alott for the info, hope your computer gets fixed.
carlos343 2 years ago
He was great in the live action Cat in the Hat.
Blacksheep2134 2 years ago
Nope
Kaulen777 2 years ago
Really? You didn't like it? Oh well, to each his own I guess.
Blacksheep2134 2 years ago
Thats probably not sayng much.
Ryoku75 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You, sir, are either a liar or someone with a low standard for great.
@confusedmatthew
Am I still a layperson if I know both Deepak Chopra and Richard Dawkins?
P.S. I actually liked the South Park episode making fun of Dawkins even as a fan of his, and I normally loathe South Park's politics. Apparently, I am just weird.
AndrewTheEternal 2 years ago
It's not just the problem of finding people who know Deepak Chopra or Richard Dawkins, it's finding people who know them AND who watch your film/TV series AND who find the joke funny.
As Matthew says, that's only going to be a tiny proportion of your audience, especially if it's a comedy which depends in part on deliberately stupid sight gags.
finnobrit1 2 years ago
Hey Matthew, you mentioned that your computer is dead. Is it your hard drive that's not working? Cause you could ideally take out your internal hard drive where you saved your files on, and place it into an external hard drive chasis so you can use it as an external hard drive and have access to your original files. I hope that helps any.
DOTD25 2 years ago
Mike Myers sucks! Guy isn't funny at all, and just recycles his gags....lame!
Plus he's a total whiner who won't get out of his trailer because he doesn't have his latte. The guy fired a prop worker for giggling while near him on this set!
dasfx 2 years ago 2
He fired another worker for saying "hi" to him. No joke.
rollicker 2 years ago
LOL.
Kingkong922 2 years ago
Hooray! You're computer is dead. That computer was shit.
tecpaocelotl 2 years ago
The problem with Mike Myers, is the same problem with Eddie Murphy. They are both going thru the "wrestler" syndrome. They started out as nobody's, became big superstars, made alot of money and became household names, then their popularity started to fade and now they are both trying to stay in the spotlight by making movie after movie that turns into flop after flop. They need to stop (especially Murphy), retire from movies and live their lives with the money they have.
thisisrumorcontrol 2 years ago 5
Is it me or does Myers look like Jack Black in that pic?
nonamerequired123 2 years ago
ur brother sound exactly like you. its hard to differentiate.
thorax91 2 years ago
It's because they are identical twins.
0mni42 2 years ago
they're identical twins, lol.
yellowchairreviews 2 years ago
Psychomantle replied to my comment with "Stop nitpicking about little shit, you sound like a faggot." and then immediately deleted it. I can only assume he meant for just me to see the message, while no one else would know he's the type to use that word. Well, screw that, here his response can live for all time.
Rmlohner 2 years ago
Richard Dawkins got mad because South Park made fun of him? Never knew that. I find it hard to believe when South Park continuously makes fun of Jesus, and I'm sure he gets a kick out of that. Seems very hypocritical with him and with the certain christians who suddenly jumped on SP's band wagon.
quleughy 2 years ago
Isac Hayse did the same thing: it was okay to make fun of every religious and non religous organization on the planet untill they made fun of his.
standinstann 2 years ago 15
He said that people who liked Richard Dawkins got mad, which I find hard to believe. They showed Dawkins to be a smart guy, which he is. And Richard Dawkins isn't obscure, what kind of retard hasn't heard of Richard Dawkins?
CENSOREDFORSEX 2 years ago
Not everyone is a basement dwelling douchebag who read books for the trendy pseudo intellectual. Who hasn't heard of Richard Dawkins? More like, who gives a fuck about Richard Dawkins?
chuckb11 2 years ago
-when you don't understand a comedy. People outside the US actually look down for the most part on the idea you have of 'undersanding' comedy outside your own country.
I've not watch 'the love guru' simply because I knew that I wouldn't find it funny, just like I've not seen Hostel/a haunting in connecticut because I know I'll dislike them. Try poking at the actual points that make it 'a bad movie' instead of complaining you didn't get it.
scionlightning 2 years ago
Y'know, that's the problem with Americans in general when it comes to comedy, as long as you don't try to understand a joke, it's going to shoot right over your heads, I remember sitting in a New York Cinema, watching Munich for the firest time and seeing the whole place literally roar with laughter when the main guys daugfhter say's 'daddy' for the first time and he cries.
What Americans need to do is try to have a more mature comedy, few sitcoms, etc do that and its small of you to critisize-
scionlightning 2 years ago
On an unrelated subject, you two sound almost identical!
CaptainPositron 2 years ago 3
BTW. It kind of blows my mind Confused Matthew posted just 20 minutes ago. If your listening I'd like to say that youre a great reviewer and were all dying to find out what youre worst movie of all time is
Therapy44me 2 years ago
Stand in Stan said it was 1- Meet the Parents followed by 2- Wedding Crashers. I'd have to disagree. Epic Movie is not only 0 percent funny, but just plain disgusting
Therapy44me 2 years ago
Never seen "Epic Movie". I'll let you know if I do, and if my top 3 changes ;)
standinstann 2 years ago
Hrm, you said it was the third least funny movie you saw. What were #1 and #2?
lseths 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Dawkins is hardly obscure.
An asshole, yes, but not obscure.
TheSilhouette 2 years ago
Try this out:
Ask the first twenty people you see on any given day if they have ever heard of him.
I did this today at work. I didn't get to twenty, but I asked twelve: seven co-workers and five customers. Of those twelve, zero people knew who he was.
confusedmatthew 2 years ago
That's hardly a test of obscurity, most people are not educated and wouldn't know who Carl Sagan, Michio Kaku, or Steven Hawking are, either.
Obscure people are not 7 time New York Times Best Selling authors. Obscure means "not prominent or famous", which is hardly a fitting adjective for Dawkins, one of the most famous scholars of our age.
UltraSWG 2 years ago
we can't expect to see movies or show episodes exclusively on subjects that most people heard of.
Most people don't know who RD is. But still, many do.
Bulloxe4 2 years ago
@confusedmatthew Hey could I discuss the Star Wars prequels with you and Stand in Stan threw wabcam when I have the technology necassery, because I am a huge defender of the Star Wars prequels and I would like to explain a lot to you and clear up some of your confusion.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1 I watched the prequels again after watching reviews from two different online critics. They were right about the plot holes. There were 'a lot' of holes.
unytcommsys 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
Make a review video then and post it on youtube. It would be unique, as the rest of us think these are objectively bad movies, and get a lot of views.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Oke I am working on it, but it wil take a lonf whie cause I will have to read all SW cabon and watch more movies, also I am working on a rating system and am still very very sick.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
You don't really need to read any cannon. You are reviewing the movies, just watch them. Books outside of the movies can only cloud your opinion. In fact, they may be responsible for your liking the movies, given that the books explained so much that the movies left out. That makes the books good, not the movies.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur In fact I saw all six movies 8 times, and some more, before I ever even heard of the EU, I kmnow I am gonna review the movies, but reviewing them without the other caanon would be like reviewing Emmpire without having seen Hope. It would be an incorrect thing to do.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
No, seeing Hope makes sense because it's another movie. Besides, how does a review that includes a whole lot of EU information from books, comics and videogames help if most people are unfamiliar with them?
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Well first of all many peopl e lknow the EU, second the rule of franchises is is that all material aproved by the owner as canon is part if the fictuional universe and also that someone can continue his or hwer story threw forms pf other medua, something tjhhat often happens. I don`t think I can make up my own rule that only the movieds count, it would be like reviwewing ST films without havig seen the series, please respond???
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
Actually, you should review the Star Trek movies without having to refer to the tv series. I loved the movies, but have only seen a few episodes of the original series.
Look at it this way, why should I have to wait years and have to buy a series of books just to understand a movie? Shouldn't they have made the movie clearer and provided more information.
You get no extra points for the movie for the info you left out.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Well the thing is that the SW EU is a long and complex mythology and I want o read it in order, so I know if the movie contradict them, cause continuetyerrors, means a nmovie loses a few points, also I dind most o the books very interesting. please respond???
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
First, it's hard to respond when your spelling and grammar are this bad.
Second, I love the books (I recommend the Tales of the Jedi comics and the Republic Commando novels) but reading them is not NECESSARY to evaluate the movie. If there is info in the books that explains huge gaps in the Movie, then that means the movie should have provided the information. If it contradicts some remote EU piece very few have read, then that is also unimportant.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Sorry for the bad spelling. Second irt`s tru they shouldn`t explain big gaps, but they explain some small gaps, that were i th movie case it was alread explained in the EU. Alsoit is true that if it contradicts a small EU piece that isn`t ery important, but it is atleast a bit, I interested in the intire mythology and how the prequels hold up in that, if they work well with it and if Lucas manaed to stay loyal to his fans. please respond/??
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
First, they should explain the gaps, but it should be done in the movies.
Second, Lucas DIDN'T stay true to the fans. The prequels contradicted the original movies and EU in many places. But that's not really the issue. These movies shouldn't be judged because they violated the cannon, even if that violation pisses me off, they should be judged on dialogue, plot and characters--all of which sucked.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Hey funny I read this now, cause I was just reading abut the Live action SW series. Second: I agree movies should be pretty sytand alone, but not way more than tjhey swquels should stand alonbe, movies are alliowed to vbe follow ups to orther media, and although the EU i B con it still ccounts. So must of the stuff should be explained un the movies, bt some SMALL things not. I made the rule they are allowed to rely 50 % ,(of the ammount they rely on eachother), the can rely on the EU
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Continued, mention which contradictiobns. Fourth I agree movies should be judged based on caracters, plot and dialogue, but also on canon violation, if you make a sequel/ oprequels and relwease it such, it will be judged first and foremost as a film, a secomd as a part of the franchise. I agree caracters an dialogue, come first but the second does matter, main eexample being T3 I think the movies was a finger to Cameron and give it many poibnt dwn, for thatt, but it still rocked.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Continued. Oke wwell mking mt review will tak a while, but I CAM give a stomg and well thoughout defence right now. So bring it on!!! WAAA just kiddibng, not but bring up tyour complains and I will counter them. please respond?????????
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
ConfusedMatthew and Redlettermedia put it best:
Characters: Either very underdeveloped and explained(Darth Maul and Dooku), unlikable and annoying (Anakin, Jar Jar, Yoda) or dull (Obi Wan, Quigon, and Padme)
Dialogue: Awful in all three. It's uncomfortable, awkward and annoying. Any speech is long and boring.
CGI: Too much of it and what there is is cluttered, making the scene confusing. Other times it's so exagerated and silly. Less is more.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Oke first of all Dooku was totally explained, he was an e Jedi,, who had left the order ad who had heavy political ambiytions, and eventualy ende up joining the Darkside and turning, evil andthen tried to follow this aambiyoins qith the Seperatist. He is also bvery vengefull and angry at the Jedi and constantkly wa too prove he has becom strionger then them, he has also becom a cold murdderer, but aometimes he has short moments of sympathy for his old friends to be continued..
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur He was also the master of Qui Gon and due to this has a special amvbition ro get Obi Wan to join him. Anakin was very likeable, ghe truely cared for Padme and his mom and even tried to b a good aprentice to Obi Wan and only aced frustrated ab angry when Obni Wan started to patronise, him for no reason, Obi Wan mistreated hi, also don`t forget Luke was whiny too. Also h truely cares for soiet and is a brave Jedi and fought bravely i in the Clone War agsinstDooku the asain etc..
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1 anikan was an asshole, obiwan was giving constructive criticism, not patronising him
546ROCKETMAN 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
Cont'd.
Plot: It's incomprehensible throughout the three films.
No info about the origin or nature of the Sith. This is even worse because the third movie is Revenge of the Sith and we don't know who the Sith are or why they want revenge. (credit to CM)
The characters act in illogical and stupid ways purely because the plot needs them to.
Palpatene's betrayal was obvious. Yet no one figured it out. Nor did anyone follow up on Maul or go to Nabu to capture him.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Oke a few things, foirst off the Sith are of the few unexplained ciobncepts in the PT and that is oke becauase they are mostly pylibng string iun th bacjgrounf. They do explain the things that matter, the politics seperatisr crisis, the Clone story etc, and they do itrosuce the important caracters, rthe Sith wre explaine d in the EU, and one of th few EU elements ehicjh were used in the films most of the pre PT EU did mothing for thetroilogy, accept for the Sith.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
Plot Cont'd.
The Trade federation: Everything. Their organization, motivation and plans are baffling. Who were they, what did they want and how would attacking Nabu benefit them?
Romance: Awkward, forced and boring. Just terrible.
Seperatists: How were they villains? They just wanted independence.
Gen. Grievous: A cartoon super villain robot with asthma. Need I say more?
I'm rambling, for a more complete argument check Redlettermedia and CM.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Romance: uh it should nbe akard they are young, forced why, boring if you think caracterdevelopment is boring then..
Seperatosts no, THEY WERE NOT JUST TRYING TO LEAVEE read thr opening scroll: they were making it dificult for the Jedi to maintain peace and order, they were atracking the republic and raisinfg there ow armies in an attemp to plunder and start thei own empire. Generl Frievous: the Joke ned I say more.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur I cheched them both, but let`s first se what you think of my points, man of yurs where totally unfair.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Also I would lik to ad the Jedi weren`t even trying to stop the Seperarists from leavingm, thwy wnted to form an army to be assisted in defending the republi against the atrAack, and they feared if theu couldn`t get the sepweratists t stay the woul atachk them even more, wha iswhat often happens, espivcial considering they consstet from corrupt evil asholls, and theeey were asemnlig othrers too joi them, they wanted to builyt an empire..
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
The jedi formed and led a Republic Army before the Separatists had attacked them. Then, they infiltrated the Separatist base. Then, they attacked the Separatists. That makes it look like the Separatists were defending themselves.
They weren't forming an empire, but a coalition of various species and robots. In fact these nations seemed to be poorer, smaller and more rural than the Republic.
It's not illegal to leave the Republic.
They were no more corrupt than the Republic.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Uh the Jedi started using theuir armies for attack, when they had heard from the leaders of the seperatists themselves, that they were planning to attack them, all they did was using attack as the best defence, they heard the sepreratusts wer planning on blackmailing them and forcing demands on them. Maybe they didntt want t form an emnpire, bu they wrre seeking powet, they started tacking the republivc and wanted armies to blackmsil the republic. That is evil, the Jedi just defend.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
No, they formed the army before Dooku states he wanted to attack the Republic. EVen then, he said he wanted to leave the Republic because it was under the control of a Sith lord.
What demands? If it's a demand for independence, then that is not evil. If you read the EU, systems are allowed to leave the Republic.
Once again, wanting to leave the Republic, forming an army and fighting the Republic when they were attacked are all legal.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur Oke first of all creating army, do you have one is case your attacked s not bad at all. Also the Clone Army wasn`t lealise or turned into a standing army yet. Dooku also memtioneed he waNTED to blavcmil the reublic aND the story about Sdeous was a means to get Obi Wan too join him. Uh ant demands the woul make, they werre plannin on veryrowin D blackmailin the reoublic. They dudn`t form an army a means of defwnce, they announced they were leavng and then starte ttackng the republic..
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1
Yes but they only establish that the Separatists are planning extortion and invasion AFTER Mace Windu establishes that the Jedi will fight to keep the Separatists within the Republic. These are Jedi's who won't fight to free slaves, defeat the Hutts or crime. These same Jedi in the EU banned their Jedi Knights from fighting the Mandalorians, who enslaved worlds and committed genocide. But when they have no more info than the Separatists are leaving, they jump to form an army.
mst3k4evur 1 year ago
@mst3k4evur No Mace Windu said there ouldn`t be enough Jedi to protect the ereopublic, they weren`t planing to fight for it, a al. They fered that te seperarist were planig a war, which mskes sense case they were attacking themfro the beinning iof the film, tremmembe the opening they were making it dificult for them to msintsin peace ad order, so they were atytacking them, so uit is logical to asume that whe tjhey realygform their own nation their attacks will icrease.
reviewreviewer1 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1 "contradicts a small part"? umm.... that small part youre speaking of, IS WHAT STARTED THE STARWARS SAGA!!!! im huessing youre likeidk, eight?
546ROCKETMAN 1 year ago
@reviewreviewer1 "contradicts a small part"? umm.... that small part youre speaking of, IS WHAT STARTED THE STARWARS SAGA!!!! im huessing youre likeidk, eight?
546ROCKETMAN 1 year ago
@confusedmatthew if they have ever heard of who?
Rapter57 1 year ago
Can't wait for you guys to do Watchmen! Love to hear your take.
ProzacMan 2 years ago
Are You Two Twins...???
You Almost Sound The Same
grievousrocks 2 years ago
They are actually.
Intrepid237 2 years ago
I noticed that too.
TheSilhouette 2 years ago
whats the point of reviewing a movie negatively if the movie is already shit?
but watchmen?? im lookin forward to this :P.
gugrocks 2 years ago
Goldmember didn't tank, it made $297 million worldwide on a $63 million budget. It sucked, but it didn't tank. I think he just went off the rails.
gofindyourownawesome 2 years ago 5
This actually makes a fairly good listen. Kind of feels like a segment for an online radio talk show, if that makes any sense.
vistaphyte 2 years ago 2
yeah, it felt kind of like that to me as well.
You should do these unscripted reviews with Stan more often ^^
LeonSKennedy828 2 years ago
I loved the Watchmen
GreekJR2 2 years ago
you should make backup files for your reviews.
thedudeperson 2 years ago 3
I dunno about you saying that no one could have found that funny, and they were too late into production- Jason friedburg and Aaron Seltzer think their work is classic comedy.
videogamenostalgia 2 years ago
im sick
possem33 2 years ago
Comment removed
kranktank 2 years ago
wow thats bad my computer is dead and im using my sisters until i get a new one
grandtheftauto5555 2 years ago
Goldmember didn't really tank, last time I checked.
truthhopelove 2 years ago 5
It's just Watchmen, no "the!" Hopefully that was just a screwup caused by this not being scripted, as people who add a "the" to the title really annoy me. There's no faster way to tell someone doesn't really care about the novel.
Rmlohner 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
PsychoMantistle 2 years ago
this movie sucked
803HighRollers 2 years ago
i fucking hate watchmen, it was slow confusing and everything was irrelevant to the plot. go ahead matthew bash on it all you want. you'll finally review something that i also dont like
pokemon918 2 years ago
Did you even read the book?
civilwarfare101 2 years ago
RIP Confused Matthew's Computer
KmegaDude 2 years ago 15
@KmegaDude We hardly knew ya :) !
unytcommsys 1 year ago
I laughed hysterically at the south park episode mocking Richard Dawkins , The best part was seeing him Cornhole Mrs Garrison and then find out over the telephone the women he was in the middle of fucking was really a man.
Obasiliasfilosofos 2 years ago 2
I'm glad you guys can see why Meet the Parents is supposed to be funny. Being in those kind of families makes it a good situational comedy, and the numbers do add up obviously.
ManThatSeesMovies 2 years ago
Richard Dawkins is obscure?
Treesby 2 years ago
If you are into what he does and what he stands for, you knowe who he is. if you are against what he does and what he stands for, you know who he is.
But those two groups are a minority. Most people don't care.
confusedmatthew 2 years ago
I don't doubt you. I was just surprised that he wasn't well known based on what you said about the South Park forums. As for the movie, I didn't think it looked good. This review confirmed it and maybe saved me from watching it. Good luck getting your files back!
Treesby 2 years ago
Wow, you are going to get a new computer on the same date as I am! Can't wait for my Netbook. Oh, and keep up the excellent work. ;-)
Theophilosxxv 2 years ago
If you bash Watchmen,I'm going to hunt you both down and rip your fucking throats out.
Your reviews can be good,don't bail on Watchmen.
We know the GN is better,but don't you DARE.
Adiorocks949 2 years ago
Now he's just gonna bash Watchmen out of spite. I've never seen it. I wish I did.
megamanpda 2 years ago 2
calm down dude, it's just a web reveiw
spam1138 2 years ago
dude, you really need to chilax. Just because he might not agree with you or like a movie that liked doesn't mean you should bash him for it or even threaten him in that matter.
At least hear him out...
KmegaDude 2 years ago
I'm love the watchmen comic but the movie had it's flaws. I want to hear what CM thinks about it.
Steve2323ZX 2 years ago
Confused Matthew I am one of the 30,000 people who would know what the SVU joke would be.
ReviewForReel 2 years ago
matthew and his brother sound alike.
ChangFromUS 2 years ago
18 my birthday :D
PlayRunescapeNow 2 years ago
Happy Bday
RiFFxxx 2 years ago
oh fuck! standinstan OVERLOAD! Just saw his review for apocalypto 10 mins ago and now this lol
islanumblar 2 years ago
You should probably label these '1 and 2' just to make it simpler to tell which one goes first.
These unscripted reviews are really insightful and entertaining :)
bloodrunsclear 2 years ago
Oops, thought I did. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.
confusedmatthew 2 years ago
This film was fucking terrible,
Iacrodgers 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
TEH FIRST TEH BITHCEZEZ
1
megamanpda 2 years ago