I saw it when I was on holiday in Australia (such things are not shown on German Television at the moment). I am not sure if there is any sense in that. I think this could happen to everbody everywhere even without a k over and most people already know that driving is dangerous. All I can do is to drive carefully and hope that I will never get involved in any accident and thats all I need to know.
I think its awesome! They should be showing that in every country! Thats the only really way to get the point across. And after seeing that people still wont listen.
The State Government of Queensland has no objection of this material making me scream and then not sleeping any more... this is really tough stuff. Reality is even tougher i suppose.
speed doesn't kill, its the manner in which you're at speed. All this omg a couple kmh/mph over the speed limit is no real indication of elevated risk endangering a life. This is total bullshit. All that has been made clear (or at least i thought so until people posted otherwise) is that the guy was driving 'wrecklessly' weaving in and out, talking, with a kid in the FRONT SEAT, looking over, being quite euphoric in a tense situation, and choosing to avoid a fence for a baby and mother.
every k over does potentially put each life at risk. Say you are driving at 65 km/h instead of 60km/h it would take a longer distance to both react and actually stop. These 5 k's could mean the difference between hitting someone at a relatively slow speed (under 10 km/h) or a fatal one.
in the united states they say that if you are going 60mph you will travel 100 feet before your foot even touches the brake petal think about that next time you are speeding
This arguement is stupid. So why would you do 60kmph when you can stop quicker and cover less distance at 50kmph? Why do 50 when you can do 40? Why do 40 when you can not move at all and put no one at risk?
You realise people need to get from one place to another right? This does involve moving at speed and unfortunately due to the nature of the activity - YES PEOPLE WILL DIE.
The advertisement is misleading anyways, doing 80 in a 70 zone did not cause the crash, him swerving about did.
- "So why would you do 60kmph when you can stop quicker and cover less distance at 50kmph? Why do 50 when you can do 40?"
Because all roads have different limits, more open road means more speed because there is less chance of an accident. If he was doing 70 or under, he wouldn't have had to swerve.
So what if the bloke in the other lane was doing 10 kays slower (like he was in the video) but was doing 60 instead of 70 and the other bloke was doing 70 instead of 80? he still would have hit and done exact same damage even though he was NOT speeding.
On a street like that, a 70 km/h limit is crazy. Over here, the limit would no more than 35 mi/h (56 km/h). Kinda graphic for a general audience, isn't it?
Obviously that was a lot more than just speeding.
lfsracer79 1 year ago
'Every K over is a Killer'
That's about one sixth of normal walking pace!
Therefore Every 6 k's over would be walking pace over the limit!
4fsake 2 years ago
absolute crock of shit.
Barraman69 2 years ago
Every (k) over is a dollar.
KYjelly 3 years ago 2
@KYjelly YOULL BE SORRY WHEN YOU SMASH YOUR FUCKING HEAD INTO A DAMN TRUCK, WHILE LOOKING AT YOUR WHORE
EAFSQ9 2 years ago
Why would I be looking at your mum?
KYjelly 2 years ago 2
@EAFSQ9 Shouldnt talk about your mom like that mate. Sheesh!
KYjelly 1 year ago
I saw it when I was on holiday in Australia (such things are not shown on German Television at the moment). I am not sure if there is any sense in that. I think this could happen to everbody everywhere even without a k over and most people already know that driving is dangerous. All I can do is to drive carefully and hope that I will never get involved in any accident and thats all I need to know.
Detritusman1982 3 years ago 2
I couldn't sleep for a week wen i saw that add it rattled me so much should be shown around the world just like carmarvan22 said
bigjeeves72 4 years ago
your mentally unstable.
AKCzech555 3 years ago
I think its awesome! They should be showing that in every country! Thats the only really way to get the point across. And after seeing that people still wont listen.
CarMarVan22 4 years ago
this is austrailia for ya we have the highest speed ratio and the lowest speed limits in the world lol
davoplace 4 years ago
well, they sure got their point across
ognamedjesus 4 years ago
blood. Europe is friki'n crazy.
narutojutsumaster 5 years ago
Except this is in Australia, since this is a commercial from Queensland.
Watcher3223 3 years ago 2
The State Government of Queensland has no objection of this material making me scream and then not sleeping any more... this is really tough stuff. Reality is even tougher i suppose.
samopdrift 5 years ago
omg! thats 1 hard hitting quit speeding vid
trubbl 5 years ago
Either way, it does get the point across. Speed does kill.
BigLisaFan 5 years ago
speed doesn't kill, its the manner in which you're at speed. All this omg a couple kmh/mph over the speed limit is no real indication of elevated risk endangering a life. This is total bullshit. All that has been made clear (or at least i thought so until people posted otherwise) is that the guy was driving 'wrecklessly' weaving in and out, talking, with a kid in the FRONT SEAT, looking over, being quite euphoric in a tense situation, and choosing to avoid a fence for a baby and mother.
darkrakuen 5 years ago
every k over does potentially put each life at risk. Say you are driving at 65 km/h instead of 60km/h it would take a longer distance to both react and actually stop. These 5 k's could mean the difference between hitting someone at a relatively slow speed (under 10 km/h) or a fatal one.
brizzyboy18 2 years ago
in the united states they say that if you are going 60mph you will travel 100 feet before your foot even touches the brake petal think about that next time you are speeding
yahelln1nja 2 years ago
This arguement is stupid. So why would you do 60kmph when you can stop quicker and cover less distance at 50kmph? Why do 50 when you can do 40? Why do 40 when you can not move at all and put no one at risk?
You realise people need to get from one place to another right? This does involve moving at speed and unfortunately due to the nature of the activity - YES PEOPLE WILL DIE.
The advertisement is misleading anyways, doing 80 in a 70 zone did not cause the crash, him swerving about did.
Precisionstonemaul 2 years ago
- "So why would you do 60kmph when you can stop quicker and cover less distance at 50kmph? Why do 50 when you can do 40?"
Because all roads have different limits, more open road means more speed because there is less chance of an accident. If he was doing 70 or under, he wouldn't have had to swerve.
PspTrusz 2 years ago
So what if the bloke in the other lane was doing 10 kays slower (like he was in the video) but was doing 60 instead of 70 and the other bloke was doing 70 instead of 80? he still would have hit and done exact same damage even though he was NOT speeding.
XR351w 2 years ago
On a street like that, a 70 km/h limit is crazy. Over here, the limit would no more than 35 mi/h (56 km/h). Kinda graphic for a general audience, isn't it?
snarkykat 5 years ago
it was never shown on prime time television and even then it still got taken off.
its awful but i think it gets the message across.
fairywannabe 4 years ago
I second that
tendonut 5 years ago