Added: 3 years ago
From: westondaniel89
Views: 6,765
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I love the new design :-)

  • this is one very cool set

  • In this round, the third, fourth, and tenth questions didn't contain the previous question's answer.

  • Part of the second answer relates to the third, and part of the third relates to the fourth, but if they had been worded differently then they would have upheld the pattern:

    "What playing card is called the curse of Scotland?"

    "The nine of diamonds."

    "In Diamonds Are Forever, who played Blofeld?"

    "Charles Gray"

    Also, the answer to the ninth question doesn't relate to the tenth question, nor does its answer carry over to the eleventh.

  • The word "faithful" in question nine carries over to "Adam Faith" in the next question, but it's not the same as the answer relating to the next question. And the answer was "What Do You Want," but it didn't quite play out in the next question, which meant turning lead into gold.

  • david was crap how did he win

  • That's a bit harsh. He was awesome at physical ability and observation.

  • And he answered three of the General Knowledge Questions. Jonathan Cairns only answered one, so David Brooks pulled slightly ahead to win.

  • He wasn't awesome at observation, only the assault course. There were 3 of them just as good as each other at that round.

  • No he wasn't that good. Contestants in the old series would have wiped the floor with him in comparison. His first and second rounds were appallingly bad. That final round isn't really fair. For example, even the 2 who only had 16 and 18 points could have won had they answered most of the questions yet never won a round and got 10 points yet.

  • Should it be +/- 1 point for each answer?

  • i think it was 2 points for a correct answer and a point deducted for a wrong answer in the original show. it should only be one point though you´re right.

  • Originally players were individually asked general knowledge questions worth one point apiece in turn, then came 100-second speed round with each question worth +/- 1 point. In 1986, when the Response round was added and the Observation round changed formats, only the speed round remained. In 1988 the question values were doubled and the time was reduced to 90 seconds (100 in 1989, 90 from 1990-1992, and 75 in 1993 and 1995). I think a 60-second round with values of +/- 1 would be best.

  • What I would suggest is six rounds, Mental Agility, Observation, Intelligence, Physical Ability, and General Knowledge, followed by a Super Round. The first four rounds could have the 2/4/6/10 scoring system with tiebreakers, and General Knowledge could be +/- 1 point for 60 seconds. What I liked about the Super Round was that it combined all aspects of mental and physical ability and allowed any player to come back.

  • I cant believe this show had 5 million watching the return on ITV on New year's day Roll on the rest of the series and series 2

  • It was shown on Thurday's at 7:30pm against Eastenders in a battle of the ratings.

  • They Scrapped the response round with the flight simulator?

    Damn that was my fave round.

  • It seemed to repeat, but there could have been Halo games or RC vehicles in response.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more