Great video steeper33, im posting this to my facebook wall so all my sheeple friends may actually stop watching their mainstream tv and start waking up!
Are any of you also aware of Hurricane ERIN that was closest to NYC on 9/11 and that after the event on the towers it done what no other Hurricane has done before and that is made a 90 Degree turn away from the coast out into the Atlantic.
The towers were built on BEDROCK,if they hit the ground the sisemic signal would have been huge,they registered no more then 2.3,that means they did not even hit the ground,they BLEW away in the wind.
I do not believe that explosives done that to two towers,they were turned to dust from the top down,the amount of explosives needed to dustify the towers would be astronomical.
I would urge anyone to read Where Did The Towers Go by Dr Judy Wood or go to her web site and see hundreds of photos,many taken on the day,of the EVIDENCE she has amassed.
Would any of you Tubers be aware that when the towers were hit and when they went away there was a change in the Magnetic Field of the earth.A FACT.
steven jones admitted he was wrong bout the wtc7 collapse time. he admitted that he IGNORED THE EVIDENCE. lol, so what other BS have you guys been swallowing from this guy and others like him?
ItWasTyped. com for the story and MORE on conspiracy theories
hi just a thought, does anyone think that this plan was conceived at the same time the buildings were being built? and that the dinosaurs who originally came up with the plan were extremely stubborn and oldguyish and refused to see how the internet would play such an immense part in exposing them as opposed to say 1981 when all of our info came from the television like local news followed by the world news 'brought to you by'..wtc 1&2 were built to fall.this aint The Liberty that you can blow up
Also, where the hell is the blasting caps and detonating cord that would have been used? You would need quite a bit for a building that large. There is no possible way the government could have snuck in and removed them all from the debris before someone found at least a couple. And no goddamn missile hit the pentagon, you can go to snopes.com for the pictures of the airplane debris and the surveilance camera from a nearby gas station that clearly shows an airplane.
It's obviously an inside job. The evidence is overwhelming. No planes hit building 7. WTC7 is the smoking gun but there are so many more. At this point you are either a truther, a denier, or a liar. As the evidence mounts the last two categories are looking more and more like traitor. The collapse did start at the bottom but you are lame to search the evidence. Phillip Morelli, Marlene Cruz, William Rodriguez, and many others witnessed basement level explosions.
@orderofilluminati Answer me this? When a building is controlled demoed the debris holds COUNTLESS remnants of blasting caps, det chord etc etc. It is ALL OVER THE PLACE (as per explosives experts who do this) Neither WTC or building 7 had ANY OF THAT STUFF IN THE DEBRIS!!! NOTHING.
You cant have it both ways. If it is controlled demo YOU MUST HAVE THIS STUFF. So explain that? You cant. so how do you hold on to that theory? No evidence supports it.
Another hole in the theory. If the government did this as a false flag to invade the middle east, why did they go through the trouble of attacking these buildings, when they could have just crashed the planes after they were hijacked, that alone would have been enough reason to war. The destruction of the towers and the attack on the pentagon were just so unnecessary as a false flag operation.
You can theorise about motives forever but the facts are there for all to see. The buildings were demolished. People were murdered and the evidence destroyed by the powers of America.
Yeah exactly, it´s only theorizing and can not stand up against the facts everybody can see (if they´re not hypnotized by the media and screwed up so their brain can´t process simple basic observations)...
@shilohman07 well there is a reason they went to all this trouble, Silverstein and insurance money, his wtc's were in serious need of fire insulation which would have cost him a fortune to do, instead bring them down collect the money and rebuild properly. As for the pentagon, well it was a missile and it only damaged a slight part, hey you need to convince a lot of ppl to invade another country you might at well go all out.
also, according to an actual demonstration by the Energetic Materials Research and Testing center, thermite wouldn't have been strong enough. They did a test trying to melt through a steal beam with thermite, and said steal beam was much smaller than the ones used in the World Trade Center, and guess what, the themite couldn't do it. Also, i looked up the said findings of nano thermite in the dust. There was no clear chain of custody to prove that the dust came from the WTC rubble.
and if people looked through the rubble close enough to find thermite/thermite by products, how the hell didn't they find a single blasting cap? i suppose they wouldn't need much detonating cord and the cord could have melted, but surely some of the blasting caps would have survived considering how many would be needed for a building of that size. And plastic explosives wouldn't of been strong enough, so conventional charges, which require blasting caps, would of had to been used
I challenge any 9/11 conspiracy theorist to give me a logical explanation as to how the government prepared the building for demolition, which would have taken several months, several hundred people, the walls being opened, and power tools to do. How did no one notice it? how did none of the hundreds of workers needed to prepare it for demoliton not speak a word about it? why the hell were there no blasting caps or detonating cord found in the rubble? how did the charges survive the impact?
to the extent of my knowledge, and i have looked at many of the websites of conspiracy theorists, they didn't actually find thermite, they found by products. If you could point me to a reliable conspiracy theorist website that shows that actual thermite was found in the rubble, i will try to rebuke it. And if they can'
t possibly know the answer to those questions, doesn't that mean their theory has some major flaws?
I have no clue as to what you are talking about, however it really matters not whether thermite or conventional charges are said to have been used. Since the collapse started at where the airplanes hit, that means that those charges would have had to survive the impact and the fires for over an hour until the collapse. How could the charges have withstood the impact and the heat? why were they not destroyed or set off when the plane hit or immediatly after? there are so many holes in this theory
If you have no clue about the peer reviewed paper published in a open chemical physics journal titled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" then what the hell are you trying to dispute it.
@shilohman07 For months before 9/11, there were a number of unusual fire drills requiring full evacuation of the towers & workers reported what sounded like heavy machinery being moved around on floors that were supposedly empty.
check out "Unusual activities in WTC" on you-t....the government pulled off JFK assassination didn't they? people are still trying to figure that one out 40 years on.
you do realize that since the collapse started at around where the airplanes hit, halfway up the tower, this means they would have had to open the walls from the outside. Yes thats right open up the walls from the outside halfway up. You are telling me that no one in Manhattan saw a bunch of workers opening up the wall halfway up two big ass towers? even if the people inside the buildings weren't there, someone would have saw this from this outside.
and it would take probably around 100 of these fire drills, considering that a building that large would take a minimum of 3-6 weeks round the clock work to bring down. Especially because they weren't bringing it down at the bottom, but halfway up, "coincidentally" near where the planes hit.I'll admit, if the collapse had started at the bottom i'd be with you guys, but because it started near where the planes hit, it would have just been noticable to people nearby.
planes hitting the towers was the movie for the sheeple. first responders did report explosions at the ground level that were so powerful that all the glass was blown out of the foyer area & molten steel was reported at the base of the tower structures weeks after 9/11 despite heavy rain falling on the area during this period.
u can keep believing the government line...it is not in my interest to convince u....GOOD LUCK DUDE
The squib happens precisely at the beginning of "collapse" initiation which rules out a pressure release that far down the structure.
Also, (for arguments sake) if it were a pressure release that far down the structure, (in an undamaged part of the building) the release would not be visible unless it blew office contents out the opening, (paper etc.) otherwise it would be clean air.
What we see is *smoke and debris* from an out of sequence explosion in that location. (squib)
In this video at 1:54 you see a *misfire* producing a squib some 40 or more stories below collapse initiation that cannot be mistaken for anything but explosives because it happens precisely at the beginning of the demolition sequence.
Just another in a long line of smoking-guns that prove controlled demolition beyond a resonable doubt.
It could be a number of things other than explosives. You see these squibs that you so LOVE to use as PROOF of explosives all over the building and often several stories below. A much more reasonable explanation would be that air being compressed below the progressive collapse has to escape somewhere, that's why you often see these squibs at the mechanical levels where the A/C inlets and outlets were, and rather large airducts ended up.
they will never admit it was an inside job...there is too much money involved among many other things! I will tell you though we all need to keep pushing this...911 was an inside job!!!! great video!!!
A spire of the superstructure left standing, as I'd expect. It no longer has weight on it, yet suddenly this spire of steel just collapses away. DAM. There's so much wrong with that if one is trying to go with the official story.
Why is that wrong? In my view it actually lends credit to the official story, that the collapse happened because the floor trusses failed and pulled the perimiter wall inwards initiating a buckling failure of the structure. However, if explosives were used, how come large sections of perimiter walls several stories tall landed relatively intact on the streets below, and how come parts of the core remains standing? Wouldn't they all have been blown?
as tragic as it is- as long as people continue to worship money and are not prepared to make sacrifices then nothing will ever be done about 9/11. Fear of losing your job and being called 'crazy' is how they keep you in line. They know how easy it is to control the masses because they know how dependant you are on stuff and status- they made it that way. This is why they can get away with practically anything and all we will do is say how outrageous it is and just continue on as normal.
Humans are weak. I am certain there are large amounts of people who will see this footage and still call us consipiracy nuts. They are too far gone in denial it is frustrating and infuriating. They have probably conditioned themselves that 'Everything is ok' so they turn their face the other way, kill the part of their hind brain yelling out bullshit and go consume pointless shit. The two towers, Building 7, the Pentagon, and the field in pennslyvannia. How can no one notice fallacies?
Bummer that A Perfect Circle has not put out anything in about 4 years.
"see through it all".
Nice!
The truth is transformative and beyond words.
As Ani DiFranco put it - 3000 people disquised as poems.
I have come to understand in my process - is that 3000 plus murdered people is nothing compared to global dominance and trillions of dollars for the military industrial complex & the corporate elte!
great vid!! But the sheep and cointelpro among others will continue to put out the propaganda, even though the evidence of implosion is overwhelming!!
@AiresQX4 This is not a squib. What you are seeing is basically a gigantic pneumatic ram in action. The building is compressing air below the collapse point and it is being ejected out the side of the building. Nothing more. A controlled demo charge would be far more obvious than that. It is high explosive and believe me you would KNOW!! It would easily shatter windows in the vicinity. Not only that but the rubble would have blasting debris all over. Which NONE of that was recovered
@AiresQX4 Actually more like some 35-40 floors below, but on the other hand - that is FAR to distant from the demolition wave not to be right away VERY, VERY supicous. So suspicious that one can't do nothing but catch one's breath in awe of what is painfully obvious. And how the hell does concrete start to pulverize from falling some 10 feet, which would be the case in the progressive-collapse theory..? Those enormous dust clouds start to form right at the very start of the fall!
Great video steeper33, im posting this to my facebook wall so all my sheeple friends may actually stop watching their mainstream tv and start waking up!
stormchaser420 1 month ago
Are any of you also aware of Hurricane ERIN that was closest to NYC on 9/11 and that after the event on the towers it done what no other Hurricane has done before and that is made a 90 Degree turn away from the coast out into the Atlantic.
The towers were built on BEDROCK,if they hit the ground the sisemic signal would have been huge,they registered no more then 2.3,that means they did not even hit the ground,they BLEW away in the wind.
2000tc88 3 months ago
I do not believe that explosives done that to two towers,they were turned to dust from the top down,the amount of explosives needed to dustify the towers would be astronomical.
I would urge anyone to read Where Did The Towers Go by Dr Judy Wood or go to her web site and see hundreds of photos,many taken on the day,of the EVIDENCE she has amassed.
Would any of you Tubers be aware that when the towers were hit and when they went away there was a change in the Magnetic Field of the earth.A FACT.
2000tc88 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
steven jones admitted he was wrong bout the wtc7 collapse time. he admitted that he IGNORED THE EVIDENCE. lol, so what other BS have you guys been swallowing from this guy and others like him?
ItWasTyped. com for the story and MORE on conspiracy theories
culturebully3 3 months ago
So what were the planes for? The hijackers get credit for nothing?
bethpage89 4 months ago
Respect for the great job the destruction company made, the gouverment knows where to hire good workers
MILFHunterNT 5 months ago
hi just a thought, does anyone think that this plan was conceived at the same time the buildings were being built? and that the dinosaurs who originally came up with the plan were extremely stubborn and oldguyish and refused to see how the internet would play such an immense part in exposing them as opposed to say 1981 when all of our info came from the television like local news followed by the world news 'brought to you by'..wtc 1&2 were built to fall.this aint The Liberty that you can blow up
linethemind 1 year ago
Anyone on Nist who went along with the official line should be jailed for fraud.
zenoist2 1 year ago
Together with the channel called "warcrime911," Steeper33 is the SH*T! (Besides ae911truth themselves, of course...)
Thetan1974 1 year ago
Also, where the hell is the blasting caps and detonating cord that would have been used? You would need quite a bit for a building that large. There is no possible way the government could have snuck in and removed them all from the debris before someone found at least a couple. And no goddamn missile hit the pentagon, you can go to snopes.com for the pictures of the airplane debris and the surveilance camera from a nearby gas station that clearly shows an airplane.
shilohman07 1 year ago
Great video.
1:51 - 2:50 was not done by an illusive movie villain living in a cave.
tropidise 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great video.
1:51 - 2:50 was not done by an illusive movie villain living in a cave.
tropidise 1 year ago
Comment removed
tropidise 1 year ago
This was definitely a controlled demolition job.
Iobosanchez 1 year ago
It's obviously an inside job. The evidence is overwhelming. No planes hit building 7. WTC7 is the smoking gun but there are so many more. At this point you are either a truther, a denier, or a liar. As the evidence mounts the last two categories are looking more and more like traitor. The collapse did start at the bottom but you are lame to search the evidence. Phillip Morelli, Marlene Cruz, William Rodriguez, and many others witnessed basement level explosions.
orderofilluminati 1 year ago
@orderofilluminati Answer me this? When a building is controlled demoed the debris holds COUNTLESS remnants of blasting caps, det chord etc etc. It is ALL OVER THE PLACE (as per explosives experts who do this) Neither WTC or building 7 had ANY OF THAT STUFF IN THE DEBRIS!!! NOTHING.
You cant have it both ways. If it is controlled demo YOU MUST HAVE THIS STUFF. So explain that? You cant. so how do you hold on to that theory? No evidence supports it.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
A New World Order you wanted, now you have it. Long live the Fourth Reich...Hale Hitler.
Archon33 1 year ago
I truely believe it was destroyed this way.... it was too controlled to be a coincidence
LeeKny 1 year ago
5 *
porcsatul 1 year ago
Hey, I am so fucking tired of the fact, that I can´t comment for some reason...
alienspacecentereast 1 year ago
Another hole in the theory. If the government did this as a false flag to invade the middle east, why did they go through the trouble of attacking these buildings, when they could have just crashed the planes after they were hijacked, that alone would have been enough reason to war. The destruction of the towers and the attack on the pentagon were just so unnecessary as a false flag operation.
shilohman07 2 years ago
@shilohman07
That's not a hole.
You think flying some planes into the ground would have traumatized the American people enough to allow the NWO's agenda. I don't think so.
The agenda is a hellofalot more than invading the middle east and until people realize that they simply will not get it.
Research the Reichstag Fire and find out why Hilter used his false flag attack.
Steeper33 2 years ago 5
You can theorise about motives forever but the facts are there for all to see. The buildings were demolished. People were murdered and the evidence destroyed by the powers of America.
eye2eye1000 2 years ago
Yeah exactly, it´s only theorizing and can not stand up against the facts everybody can see (if they´re not hypnotized by the media and screwed up so their brain can´t process simple basic observations)...
alienspacecentereast 1 year ago
@shilohman07 well there is a reason they went to all this trouble, Silverstein and insurance money, his wtc's were in serious need of fire insulation which would have cost him a fortune to do, instead bring them down collect the money and rebuild properly. As for the pentagon, well it was a missile and it only damaged a slight part, hey you need to convince a lot of ppl to invade another country you might at well go all out.
buffymtl 1 year ago
also, according to an actual demonstration by the Energetic Materials Research and Testing center, thermite wouldn't have been strong enough. They did a test trying to melt through a steal beam with thermite, and said steal beam was much smaller than the ones used in the World Trade Center, and guess what, the themite couldn't do it. Also, i looked up the said findings of nano thermite in the dust. There was no clear chain of custody to prove that the dust came from the WTC rubble.
shilohman07 2 years ago
@shilohman07
Typical debunker, pretending to be an expert. LoL
Until a scientific peer-reviewed paper refuting the nano-thermite is published, the nano-thermite stands.
Like I tell all of you. If your fine with the official story, then move on. Enjoy your life and remember the government loves you.
Steeper33 2 years ago
and if people looked through the rubble close enough to find thermite/thermite by products, how the hell didn't they find a single blasting cap? i suppose they wouldn't need much detonating cord and the cord could have melted, but surely some of the blasting caps would have survived considering how many would be needed for a building of that size. And plastic explosives wouldn't of been strong enough, so conventional charges, which require blasting caps, would of had to been used
shilohman07 2 years ago
I challenge any 9/11 conspiracy theorist to give me a logical explanation as to how the government prepared the building for demolition, which would have taken several months, several hundred people, the walls being opened, and power tools to do. How did no one notice it? how did none of the hundreds of workers needed to prepare it for demoliton not speak a word about it? why the hell were there no blasting caps or detonating cord found in the rubble? how did the charges survive the impact?
shilohman07 2 years ago
@shilohman07
Instead of asking people questions they could not possibly know the answer to.
Why don't you ask your government why nano thermite was found in the dust?
The questions you asked would be answered with a real investigation.
Steeper33 2 years ago
to the extent of my knowledge, and i have looked at many of the websites of conspiracy theorists, they didn't actually find thermite, they found by products. If you could point me to a reliable conspiracy theorist website that shows that actual thermite was found in the rubble, i will try to rebuke it. And if they can'
t possibly know the answer to those questions, doesn't that mean their theory has some major flaws?
shilohman07 2 years ago
@shilohman07
You know all about the peer-reviewed paper shill, don't play dumb.
Question - Are you saying un-ignited nano-thermetic material is the same as regular thermite?
Please tell me you are. :)
Steeper33 2 years ago
I have no clue as to what you are talking about, however it really matters not whether thermite or conventional charges are said to have been used. Since the collapse started at where the airplanes hit, that means that those charges would have had to survive the impact and the fires for over an hour until the collapse. How could the charges have withstood the impact and the heat? why were they not destroyed or set off when the plane hit or immediatly after? there are so many holes in this theory
shilohman07 2 years ago
@shilohman07
If you have no clue about the peer reviewed paper published in a open chemical physics journal titled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" then what the hell are you trying to dispute it.
Steeper33 2 years ago
@shilohman07 For months before 9/11, there were a number of unusual fire drills requiring full evacuation of the towers & workers reported what sounded like heavy machinery being moved around on floors that were supposedly empty.
check out "Unusual activities in WTC" on you-t....the government pulled off JFK assassination didn't they? people are still trying to figure that one out 40 years on.
percy5946 2 years ago
you do realize that since the collapse started at around where the airplanes hit, halfway up the tower, this means they would have had to open the walls from the outside. Yes thats right open up the walls from the outside halfway up. You are telling me that no one in Manhattan saw a bunch of workers opening up the wall halfway up two big ass towers? even if the people inside the buildings weren't there, someone would have saw this from this outside.
shilohman07 2 years ago
and it would take probably around 100 of these fire drills, considering that a building that large would take a minimum of 3-6 weeks round the clock work to bring down. Especially because they weren't bringing it down at the bottom, but halfway up, "coincidentally" near where the planes hit.I'll admit, if the collapse had started at the bottom i'd be with you guys, but because it started near where the planes hit, it would have just been noticable to people nearby.
shilohman07 2 years ago
@shilohman07
You don't have to be with "us guy's".
It's simple...
Go to AE9/11Truth and take the time to find the answers you're looking for.
If you disagree with what the experts say then George Bush's 9/11 theory is for you.
Simple :)
Steeper33 2 years ago
planes hitting the towers was the movie for the sheeple. first responders did report explosions at the ground level that were so powerful that all the glass was blown out of the foyer area & molten steel was reported at the base of the tower structures weeks after 9/11 despite heavy rain falling on the area during this period.
u can keep believing the government line...it is not in my interest to convince u....GOOD LUCK DUDE
percy5946 2 years ago
The squib happens precisely at the beginning of "collapse" initiation which rules out a pressure release that far down the structure.
Also, (for arguments sake) if it were a pressure release that far down the structure, (in an undamaged part of the building) the release would not be visible unless it blew office contents out the opening, (paper etc.) otherwise it would be clean air.
What we see is *smoke and debris* from an out of sequence explosion in that location. (squib)
KevinMerck 2 years ago 2
In this video at 1:54 you see a *misfire* producing a squib some 40 or more stories below collapse initiation that cannot be mistaken for anything but explosives because it happens precisely at the beginning of the demolition sequence.
Just another in a long line of smoking-guns that prove controlled demolition beyond a resonable doubt.
Check out A&E for 9/11 Truth to get the facts.
KevinMerck 2 years ago
@KevinMerck
It could be a number of things other than explosives. You see these squibs that you so LOVE to use as PROOF of explosives all over the building and often several stories below. A much more reasonable explanation would be that air being compressed below the progressive collapse has to escape somewhere, that's why you often see these squibs at the mechanical levels where the A/C inlets and outlets were, and rather large airducts ended up.
mlrs84 2 years ago
they will never admit it was an inside job...there is too much money involved among many other things! I will tell you though we all need to keep pushing this...911 was an inside job!!!! great video!!!
SNIPERGIRL420 2 years ago 4
wots dis tune called?
chikezie313 2 years ago
C.D. Clear as that day...
kennyd203 2 years ago
Isn't it weird how Steven Jones is smiling this big smile when he talks about the demolition of wtc7?
rockstarofredondo 2 years ago
Controlled Demolition - yes - but whether it is an inside job or an outside job - somebody did it either or both foreign and domestic.
neo2007neo 2 years ago 2
with all this talk about the government animating planes in to footage makes me think,
they could have done the same with this
pieface187 2 years ago
watch from :28 - :42
no explosives caused the steel to 'collapse'. it turned to dust ...
darjiling2 2 years ago 2
0:33 I've never seen that before.
A spire of the superstructure left standing, as I'd expect. It no longer has weight on it, yet suddenly this spire of steel just collapses away. DAM. There's so much wrong with that if one is trying to go with the official story.
OzzyPatriot 2 years ago 4
@OzzyPatriot
Why is that wrong? In my view it actually lends credit to the official story, that the collapse happened because the floor trusses failed and pulled the perimiter wall inwards initiating a buckling failure of the structure. However, if explosives were used, how come large sections of perimiter walls several stories tall landed relatively intact on the streets below, and how come parts of the core remains standing? Wouldn't they all have been blown?
mlrs84 2 years ago
9/11, bought to you by your loving masters, the elite of the world.
seriously though, what most amazes me is two things.
1.) That there are actually still people who DON'T see that it was an inside job.
2.) That there hasn't been a revolution already considering the number of people who know that it WAS an inside job.
When will it sink in i wonder, and i speak for myself here too, that our leaders DO NOT CARE ABOUT US.
3000 people dead is a walk in the park for them.
Time to fight back...
temjam01 2 years ago 3
as tragic as it is- as long as people continue to worship money and are not prepared to make sacrifices then nothing will ever be done about 9/11. Fear of losing your job and being called 'crazy' is how they keep you in line. They know how easy it is to control the masses because they know how dependant you are on stuff and status- they made it that way. This is why they can get away with practically anything and all we will do is say how outrageous it is and just continue on as normal.
playonwords55 2 years ago 2
Why would are country risk doing this when millions of people are going to see the obvious? Do they want us to rebel?
Xziz10ths 2 years ago
Humans are weak. I am certain there are large amounts of people who will see this footage and still call us consipiracy nuts. They are too far gone in denial it is frustrating and infuriating. They have probably conditioned themselves that 'Everything is ok' so they turn their face the other way, kill the part of their hind brain yelling out bullshit and go consume pointless shit. The two towers, Building 7, the Pentagon, and the field in pennslyvannia. How can no one notice fallacies?
bad4ever2001 2 years ago 2
I thought that music sounded familiar.
I was just checking for a recent release.
Bummer that A Perfect Circle has not put out anything in about 4 years.
"see through it all".
Nice!
The truth is transformative and beyond words.
As Ani DiFranco put it - 3000 people disquised as poems.
I have come to understand in my process - is that 3000 plus murdered people is nothing compared to global dominance and trillions of dollars for the military industrial complex & the corporate elte!
OutSideDeMatrix 2 years ago 2
great vid!! But the sheep and cointelpro among others will continue to put out the propaganda, even though the evidence of implosion is overwhelming!!
pat52007 2 years ago 4
5* yo!
manwello15 2 years ago 4
That squib at 2:38 must have been about 60 floors below the collapse zone.
AiresQX4 2 years ago 14
@AiresQX4 This is not a squib. What you are seeing is basically a gigantic pneumatic ram in action. The building is compressing air below the collapse point and it is being ejected out the side of the building. Nothing more. A controlled demo charge would be far more obvious than that. It is high explosive and believe me you would KNOW!! It would easily shatter windows in the vicinity. Not only that but the rubble would have blasting debris all over. Which NONE of that was recovered
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@AiresQX4 Actually more like some 35-40 floors below, but on the other hand - that is FAR to distant from the demolition wave not to be right away VERY, VERY supicous. So suspicious that one can't do nothing but catch one's breath in awe of what is painfully obvious. And how the hell does concrete start to pulverize from falling some 10 feet, which would be the case in the progressive-collapse theory..? Those enormous dust clouds start to form right at the very start of the fall!
Funkadelic2 1 year ago
9/11 = Inside Job!! Great video showing the obvious controlled demolitions. Fav'd
BTW- you should change the link in the side bar for Stephen Jones. It's actually stj911(dot)org. You don't want noobs going to Fetzer's disinfo site.
Peace
paulymac 2 years ago 17
Thank you
Steeper33 2 years ago
I may be able to buy 1 building collapse that looked like it was imploded. But 3 buildings I think thats a little much.911 was an inside job.
Thanks for the great vids Steeper33.
johnandlisam 2 years ago 4
Pretty obvious controlled demo.
Another good upload from Steeper33, thanks.
NefariousEquivocator 2 years ago 3
9/11 made in USA.
piraat6666 2 years ago 3
Great post! Goes right to the blog.
Peace!
2minstral 2 years ago
Love the music, Perfect Circle is sweet
krazedmartyr 2 years ago 2