Added: 1 year ago
From: newscientistvideo
Views: 188,208
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,038)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • by the end of the year? posted in 2010? so...i guess it didn't work out then, eh?

  • Wouldn't the gold melt?

  • @tomateiro Vlw!!!! =)

  • Ignition then the oil companies can shut it down.

  • WTF has happened to this???

  • @SlashDotDash121

    they hope they can demonstrate the principles of it within a few months, and then it's "just" up the scale.

  • Is this more productive than the Tokamak in France??? Anyone with more information on this???

  • @shogun996 From what I know, the Tokamak method has been tried for the last 50 or so years, but the laser method is a new approach and could be a lot more practical. Europe has now joined the American group that built the facility in this video because of a recent breakthrough.

  • i am excited and looking forward till ITER will start work. compared to ITER this military test facility is just a toy.

  • So whats the hold up?

  • If superconductors and high temperature alloy technologies would have been more advanced, then fusion would not have been such a big commercial problem.

  • @Zamolxx There is no alloy that exist in the universe that can handle such intense heat. More advanced superconductors (from what I've read) is one of the hurdles of sustainable fusion.

  • I was talking about the low cost effect energy wise from superconductors.

  • I want one of them, cook my KD in no time!!

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The spherical thermonuclear combustion chamber is formed from two joined semispherical parts. The feeding with fuel and electromagnetic filed flux it make through the oriffices from the central part of the semispheres, and the emergence in outside to the electromagnetic field flux it make through the maximum zone, where is joined the semispheres. The two high-speed motors are rotated in the same sense for to establishes a direct electric field between collectors.

  • @sandustanBrasov is this thig is really done or they are just planing to do it

  • • SandustanBrasov

    This reactor has spherical combustion chamber, with inner magnetic trap, with the electromagnetic field realized outside and introduced inside the sphere with electromagnetic field and fuel introduction device, and direct colected possibilitys of electrcal energy, with semispherical collectors. The device of introduction is composed from: 1).-two high-speed motors with plasmatron in its central zone; 2).-two magnetic circuits for leading the electromagnetic field flux.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Thus, with a sure magnetic trap, without switchs of heat and with the direct extraction to the electrical energy=to the particles of electrical ether, it can pass direct at the final phase of obtaining to the commercial controlled thermonuclear reactor. I consider that the price of research and realization in this case, can be of at least 10 times more small than the actual ITER project, and separated can be realized of many countries.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    I turn the globe of plasma for to realize the magnetohydrodynamic principle of directly extraction of the particles of current(electrical ether). The atoms of helium after formation can pass through the texture of the magnetic trap as residue. The electromagnetic field of the magnetic trap must let enter with power for to space out, to press, and turn with 800 m/s the globe of plasma and afterwards fastly let go outside.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Feeding a superconductive coil with an electrical current it obtain in the her round only a magnetic field. But disposing in the round of the superconductive coil a certain magnetic and dielectric pieces, it obtain the variation of the electrical permitivity and of the magnetic permeability, which will transform the magnetic field of the superconductive coil in electromagnetic field, which can evolve(go) more faraway in space, without to close immediately the curl.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    In the magnetic trap of the tokamak installation it produce only magnetic field which it maintain in the round of the coil without to fulfil the role of magnetic trap. The electromagnetic field can evolve(go) in space and in the interior of one spherical chamber, can be weaved in order to form a stratified network, which let hold the particles of the thermonuclear plasma.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    • The texture of toroidal, poloidal or stellarator magnetic field is too rare for to form a magnetic trap. The magnetic trap must let be one electromagnetic stratified wall with weaved at entrance and with disweaved at emengence. The electromagnetic wall of the magnetic trap is a wall with formation and continuous displacement.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The Sun has two sorts of magnetic field: 1)-the principlal magnetic field of the solar magnetosphere which dress the solar mass; 2)-the secondary magnetic fields which pass through the whirligig tubes by one hemisphere in another. Because the rotation of the solar mass the lines of the secondary magnetic fields are not parallel with lines of the principal magnetic field, but are adjacent and thus it form at the surface of the Sun a texture of magnetic lines as a magnetic wall.

  • SandustanBrasov

    Now the ITER can not be a makerstars, because the his specialists know not how work the Sun with his principal components. In outside of incandescent solar mass exist: principal magnetic field(solar magnetospher with magnetic trap); secondary magnetic fields(made by whirl's tubes); radiations belt; the "butterfly" diagram(with solar spots position in the ends of the whirl's tubes, which pass through the solar mass); whirl's pressure; magnetic pressure by principal magnetic field

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The conditions of thermonuclear controlled fusion: temperature, concentration, confinement and duration - can not obtained never in a tokamak installation, because the her incapacity of the magnetic trap, which can not dress and sourround whole the thermonuclear plasma. The plasma can not be restrained, can not be maintained and thus can not be heating. Till now 2011 - was confined not the plasma on the tokamak installations.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The Sun shows us how it prepare and how it produce the thermonuclear reaction, and the resonant generator of the Tesla show us how it can extract the electricity= the particles of the electrical ether, without to utilize the switchs of heat. The ethereal explanation of phenomenon is necessary because in outside of electricity= electrical ether, all ethereal substances are: the electrons, the inductive magnetic field, as and the electrical field.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe.

  • Fusion is the future and nature of the noosphere. Look up Vladimir Vernadsky!

  • e=mc'2

  • @kosmynunlimited You have to use a capital E and ² or ^2

    so that would make E=mc² or E=mc^2 (else it isn't correct :P) (just saying)

  • @thepianoaddict yes....you're right...

  • So, it's November now. How are they doing?

  • What they mean is that the energy used to create the process is small next to the energy released. Much like any nuclear process where the mechanical or kinetic energy used in the process is much smaller then the energy released.

    Consider somethiing like the A-bomb. The energy used too slam the two spheres together (usually TNT charges) is extremely smaller then the energy released from the result of the primary blast of TNT.

  • Wall street 2 anybody?

  • aren't isotopes and X-rays, like röntgen-rays, radioactive and totally dangerous?

  • UP YOURS CONSERVATION OF ENERGY!

  • I´m a private person and I have made more interesting things like that september 2012 I will publish a book about it. Nobody unterstützt me.

  • doesn't that... defy laws of physics?

  • @samantonio No. It's the same process that powers the sun, in miniature. Wiki or Google: Nuclear Fusion.

  • Never mind I got the answer in another video. The laser energy is increased using electrical energy stored in a bank of capacitors.

  • This video states that the laser is AMPIFIED in glass amplifiers. Question... Is this not in and of itself OVERUNITY? or what energy is the source of the amplification? And if there is no further energy input required for the amplification process... Then why not just use output amplified light itself as a source of free energy?

  • This is wrong, creating energy for selfish gain to create destruction is why creations such as the atomic bomb make scientists murderers!

    .....STOP TRYING TO PLAY GOD. and one, its the tax payers that are paying for most of this, and "HJP007"- what on earth are you talking about, 'get the fuck off this planet?' - what planet are you on?! earth is the only stable living base for living animals, hints why all conditions on other planets are unstable, think about what your saying!

  • @lcun selfish gain? are you stupid or just moronic? this will probably be the clean sustainable source of energy we'll use in the future, how is that selfish, oh and hint, scientist just create things, stupid ppl llike you are the ones that use them however they like... and please. this is not playing god, this is just about finding the best source of energy. are you playing god when you buy fuel for your car? yeah i dont think so, idiot.

  • @lcun what's wrong with trying to play god? According to Christians wasn't Jesus god? and aren't we supposed to emulate jesus as a standard to live up to?

  • @egokick the thing with playing god is that we are neither smart or wise enough to execute decisions in which we have no idea what the outcome will be. according to chirstian religion, it is not our place as humans to decide who is good enough to live and who is good enough to die, or something like that. we are trying to be like jesus morally speaking, not in terms of power. sorry for intruding. just my 2 cents :)

  • @hiperson641 no need to apologize, even if I disagree with you I still want to know why. So if we are neither smart or wise enough to execute decisions, shouldn't we aspire to increase our intelligence i.e. aspire to become godlike in intelligence.

    Surely no one of kind heart and rational mind is going to advocate we pick and choose who lives and dies like some sort of omnipotent being, but increasing our intelligence to help alleviate suffering across the world sounds good to me?

  • @egokick i have to agree with you about becoming smarter for the benefit of the world, but just naming it "godlike" just seems a little too... powerful (i guess) to me. categorizing aside, i completely agree with you. the only thing is, with that kind of power/intelligence, there are people in the world who would abuse it. so, it's a fine line that we walk. so, i guess what im saying is that moderation is key.

  • @hiperson641 what do you think?

  • can you say black hole ???

  • "Create more energy than the laser delivered"? Something doesn't sound right but hopefully it can fuel some spaceships so I can get the fuck off this planet ;)

  • @HJP007 It will create more energy than the laser delivered by causing fusion in the fuel pellet. The same process that lights the sun, in miniature. Google: National Ignition Facility.

  • @HJP007 The lasers the key to unlocking the energy held as matter, it doen't create anything. Think of it as the energy you use chopping down a tree vs the energy you get burning the firewood after.

  • @SoulAnkh can you explain "unlocking energy" vs. "creating" please?

  • @HJP007 he/she means that the reaction produces energy, not creating it from matter

  • @HJP007 i dont think you get it.. They're getting energy to be released from the two hydrogen isotopes, all they're doing is getting it really hot to explode it in simple terms. Im pretty sure the scientists know that energy cant be created.

  • @conradxu You've thought wrong. I am now aware of what they're trying to achieve, since I've had 8 MONTHS to do so. In more "simple terms" it's similar to how the sun creates energy. If you are "sure the scientists know that energy cant be created" then why would they state it in the video? I hope you understand why I'd like to leave this planet..

  • @HJP007 strong force holding the fuel nuclei.

  • @HJP007 he prolly ment "create more energy than it took to create the laser". maybe.

  • @HJP007 That is the whole idea in any kind of generator (fusion or conventional); get more energy out than required to light the fuel! In a fusion reactor, it is called "break even."

  • @HJP007 The strong nuclear forces required to hold helium together are less than that of several hydrogen. Fusing elements up to iron will reduce the proton weight. Essentially you're putting a whole lot of energy into one place to access the energy that holds particles together. You're not actually getting energy back from the lasers at all. You're getting a completely new source of energy, which is more than what you put in.

    Don't believe me? Look up

  • @omgitsfreakenrobert It's been looked up...I've had 1 year to do so according to my comment....we'll see what happens..simple as that.

  • @HJP007 A fission nuclear reaction produces more energy than what's needed to start the reaction.

  • @HJP007 The narrator was just confirming that it creates more energy than used by the Lasers to initiate fusion, otherwise it would not be worth doing.

    The energy comes from the fusion of the Hydrogen isotopes (not the lasers themselves)

    The laser are needed to get the fuel capsule to the correct temperature.

    Remember e=mc2 - energy is mass times the speed of light, in other worths there is a hell of a lot of energy in matter.

  • Most impressed.

    It's about time. Nice to see progress

  • And of course there's gonna be thousands of dumbfucks making end of world theories because of this.

    just like the hadron collider.

  • But how would you extract the energy from such a reactor?

  • Where do you get the substance that makes the cylinder that can withstand even half of 3.3 million degress?

    ...Or does it happen so fast or on such a tiny scale, that it doesn't matter?

  • @BeondaPale fucking idiot. it's called hydrogen, asshole. maybe you've heard of it.

  • @gregjockca1001 lol Don't mind beonda, guess what happened last month. She got pissed at me and yelled and argued with me for a week because I said bird evolution has gone on for way more than 50 years. LOL

  • gregjockca1001 is yet ANOTHER of your clones? Jeeze, get a life

  • @BeondaPale i'm my own clone, bitch. you ain't seen the likes of me yet. get ready for a mind bashing.

  • The cylinder is made of hydrogen? Really?

    Read the question next time.

    And for goodness sake, get a new avatar

  • @BeondaPale try getting a new cunt, bitch. yours is crusty and nobody wants to touch it.

  • @gregjockca1001 see? now she thinks your my clone. lol cuckoo

  • @KnighttVision i know. she's a nut. she's going to be a FUN toy to play with. i love toys.

  • It's funny how you guys act in tandem

  • @BeondaPale the stuff the pellet is made of isnt supposed to withstand that type of temperature. what happens is that the pellet heats up and expands/explodes outwards very rapidly, violently forcing the hydrogen fuel within the pellet inwards via conservation of momentum.

  • cool, thanks.

  • I'M FIRIN MA LAZAH!

  • I want a lightsaber

  • Its like the death star....wait what

  • lol cavemen i tell you...

  • looks like another technology that will end up in the weapons department...i see the potential...and i'm sure the DODO's who fund this shit, do too.

  • What else needs to happen before "ignition?" The temperature problem seems daunting.

  • I seem to recall the promise of fusion in the near future for the last 15 or 20 years. Every five years the prediction has been within 5 years. I'm not holding my breath.

  • BOOM!!! sorry wrong wire!!:P

  • Communication with lasers!

  • "perceptions of they get that have to focus the leases on such a target"

    x3

  • We're still building fission reactors despite the fact Fusion is increasing in feasibility. it's incredible.

    While Fusion is being developed, many nations are putting nuclear wastes under the ground and next generations will have to face underground radiations.

  • well of course, fusion technology is still in its experimental stage and still has a ways to go before it becomes economically viable. But I believe we are the cusp of making it happen, hopefully we'll get 'ignition' this year

    Till then fission is a sensible alternative for clean reliable and cheap power. Its a proven technology and there's nothing wrong with storing the waste as long as it can be contained. There are some nuclear reactors that can break down some of that radioactive waste also

  • Fusion is increasing in feasibility, but it's not here yet. There are numerous hurdles that need to be overcome before it becomes commercial, and until then, we need energy. Moreover, deep mine storage of nuclear waste with proper protocols can contain the waste.

  • let's hope we can genetically modify bacteria in a proper way by then.

  • this is why science is awesome

  • That is the whole point of this excercise...

    A+++ for you, The idea is to sustain fusion in a "Controlled" environment, therefore if we lost control, as can happen

    with fission, all that would happen is that fusiun would no longer take place. Simple!! frum Buz

  • WAIT WAIT IDIOTS STOP ARGUING ABOUT NOTHING AND POINTLESS SHIT NOT RELATED TO THE POINT OF THIS VIDEO.

    They claim they hope to have fusion ignition by the end of the year... but isn't the MAIN problem, and the one we've had along, the fact that we can't HARNESS this energy?

    So... we're still wayyyy far away.

  • krysolite, have we told you yet to STUFF IT UP YOUR CUNT ALONG WITH YOUR CAPS LOCK, BITCH? cuz if it's already been said, i apologize. lmao!

  • The internet: serious business.

  • One step closer to a real life death star O.O

  • anyways it doesn't matter cuz in the 22nd century, people'll see past the big bang bullshit and recognize the big bang for what it is: a black hole singularity coming from out of a much larger universe older than 14 billion years.

  • @gregjockca1001

    Oh, I have to agree with you. Although I'd be careful about tossing dates and numbers like that. You know, it's not just opinion, there's hard facts behind stuff so don't run around shouting 14 billion years like it was something you dreamed of while drunk. Although yes there is a Darwinian type of application to universes altogether. It's some sort of natural selection where universes are friendlier to lifeforms and complex systems every time they spawn.

  • corotor12345: "Oh, I have to agree with you."

    welcome to fucking reality, fag.

  • @gregjockca1001

    Oh, so I'm honest and you, in your pathetically obvious insecurity try to play smart ass and act like I just kissed your feet? Wake up gay man, the world doesn't spin around you, and you didn't make that black hole singularity concept up... it's been around for a while and I picked it up long before I even clicked on this link.

  • corotor12345, ad hominem, typical cunt. you can't speak on the subject cuz you're a retarded twit. lol.

  • @gregjockca1001

    Oh come on! Ad hominem? You're gonna pull that off? Try harder. I could go with it and say that because I think you're an ass, an egocentric idiot that tries almost too hard to reason and is too full of himself... that your claims are false.

  • corotor12345: "Oh come on! Ad hominem? You're gonna pull that off? fuck you, bitch"

    no i refuse to play your psychological games. lol.

  • @gregjockca1001

    You have some skills at escaping reason. Anyways. I'll leave you be.

  • "... that your claims are false"

    WHICH claims, cunt? you're drunk.

  • if you assholes rack your fucking brains enough, you'll be able to build not just a fusion reactor, but a POWERFUL fusion reactor that'll create its OWN goddamn singularity in order to power anti-grav units.

  • @gregjockca1001

    LOL well look at you Hawking wannabe. Ranting about black wholes as if you knew. News flash, diva, that requires mass that we cannot posses. We will not build a facility capable of doing so in our planet... we need to build it around a large enough sun.

  • corotor12345, as if. it's not hard to figure out how black holes and the weak force operate on the universe. duh!

  • corotor12345: "News flash, diva, that requires mass that we cannot posses."

    wrong again, slut. a black hole can be ANY size. if you're busy trying to make a visible black hole in order to power your fusion reactor, you're a big gigantic fail.

  • listen, bitches. just work on PRECISION, not on WASTING ENERGY. focus the goddamn beams precisely on a single point in spacetime and leave it there. focus the fucking beams on densely packed hydrogen.

  • if that was a joke ur not that funny. if it wasn't... sounds like you better march up to the laboratory and enlighten the scientists huh? i hope you realize ur a hack and that really wont get you anywhere in life.

  • lahillsm3, speaking off hacks, how the fuck is your penis after your weedwacker incident? i heard they had to make a cast and everything.

  • you guys come on, these types of videos are for the more intelligent among us, who can express themselves in a more educated way than the mindless, ignorant majority who prefer to comment on music videos and verbally abuse each other. I like to think that anyone appreciating this video is an intellectual forward thinking person. Save the cussing for mindless music videos or something.

  • @gregjockca1001

    Visible? Who ever talked about visible. You said singularity. That requires a powerful black whole, hence why I say we need lots of mass. Of course you can make a black whole the size of a cell, but that won't cause much of a distortion in space/time. Although it can effectively power something larger.

  • corotor12345: "You said singularity. That requires a powerful black whole,"

    no, idiot. first off, it's spelled "hole". kindergarten much? secondly, a singularity can be any size, even on the subatomic level, which is the only level that fusionists are interested in.

  • 3.3 milion degrees Celsius. call me an grease moneky but I don't want to be near that s**t when they push the START button. or enter/return, etc...

  • lol thats MUCH more than a star's temp.! I'd be scared to work on it!

  • lowdusk, i would! i want a fabulous tan for summer.

  • I already realized you're gay. I mean, the gay lumberjack and your profile pics are just, I don't know, proof?

  • corotor12345, it's a FIREMAN, asshole. do you not know the difference between a lumberjack and a fireman? wtf? do you call lumberjacks when your house is burning. fucking twit. hahaha.

  • @gregjockca1001

    Nice way to completely go off course when you're on the less successful side of the conversation. Yes Johny boy I tripped there, happy? I wasn't really paying attention, because I didn't really want to look at a guy who had his penis exposed in such a manner. So I ignored that and I don't know, the helmet is also used by lumberjacks, and I didn't notice a red jacket so I assumed it was a "manly" (so to speak... because to you it's probably sexy) fashion. Mistakes happen.

  • @corotor12345

    Lumberjack* Manly lumberjack fashion. Typo there... Again. Mistakes happen, especially when you're concentrating on something else. Attention attention attention, yet I wonder why ADD could have even possibly been considered a valid excuse for my mental process.

  • corotor12345: " I wasn't really paying attention"

    you never do. that's why you're a fail.

  • Oh by the way "fabulous tan guy"... A simple priest did not formulate the THEORY. He might have suggested that something was created out of an explosion... but he would have needed Einstein's relativity to first understand the relationship between the speed of light, space, time, mass and energy. So YOU fuck off... because this only shows how ignorant YOU are. Might I bother asking... are you religious? Because that'd be an irony, flamboyant man.

  • corotor12345: "A simple priest did not formulate the THEORY."

    he was a professor of physics and a priest, dumb cunt. yes he did.

  • 2010 when wil l it be of any use to us and what can it power

  • Comment removed

  • tholian web, cool shit.

  • the bloom box seems more practical than this, besides the gulping of oxygen that it does to "save power"

  • Arr...I sense an imminent danger consisting up laser eyed moth-penguins...and there will be one hero....You...

  • Me? :-O

  • ..... What

  • wow

  • I'll second that, WOW!!

    What a brilliant idea. Pun intended. Controlling lasers is much easier than the usual plasma in magnetic bottles or doughnuts. Can it really be this easy to solve our future energy needs?

    Lets hope so.

  • It never is easy. Discard that possibility cuz their ain't no free lunch. Now, that it SEEMS easy, yeah, it does... but now calculate all the quantities needed for it to be stable and efficient and you'll see why it's not easy.

  • best energy: geothermal.

  • Not much money around in that field. ;)

  • So once the first pellet is expended, what next? At what rate must pellets be ignited in this way to produce continuous heat for electricity generation? How much does each pellet cost in terms of energy to make and money to buy? After those costs are considered, is this still an economically viable way of producing heat to drive turbines? Selling NIF to people as a fusion reactor is just spin and is not helpful. Money spent on NIF should be redirected to the Navy to fund polywell fusion.

  • Dude, you must be a mind reader!! My thoughts exactly.. my primary answer to the Question of Life, HA HA However, I always answered my Chemistry teacher w/ "E=mc^2, it is the theory of relativity and therefore is the answer to ALL Questions. I guess that may be why I always got dees?! O: nooo Mr Bill!!!

  • @BuzzDyou I'm sorry but E=mc^2 has virtually nothing to do with relativity. Maybe you should have taken physics instead of chemistry.

  • Maybe he should've taken plastic arts instead of chemistry. E=mc^2 is only an equation explaining the relationship between mass and energy... LOL, relativity is, well, how to define relativity? The behavior of everything when subject to movement? Hmm, I don't know, I guess relativity is too large in general to sum up that easily.

  • Plastic arts? Bonehead, try Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia for the

    definition of "Special" relativity, clearly that you should always check your references.

    There are Einsteins general theory of Rel-ativity to which you were referring... when in doubt look up your referrences, yeah umm okay Mr. Mackee (corodded synapses) frum Buz

  • E=mc^2: We were discussing the relevance of that equation and it's application to life. You suggest it's relativity itself and therefore the answer to all questions. While I suggest you're either high or very poorly educated. I don't want special relativity, I don't care, because E=mc^2 is not relativity, or special relativity, or any type of relativity. It's like me telling you that tomato sauce is culinary itself, when it's only food if you wanna eat it, or if you cooked it to be eaten.

  • @corotor12345, you say tomato and I say potato... My comment from above was moved up to "post a new comment" and was originally a reply to @myname12321,

    from last week... so drag your E=mc SQ on to some other turf... go an argue with

    gregjocka1001 or sumthin?! enuf^2 Buz

  • thanks for the astute observation.. I wasn't targeting googolons, the point was that "mikontisoft" and "dinosaur -

    avenger1989" weren't making too much of

    a great argument, relating to fusion power

    indeed, fission has been around since they blew up TRINITY at New Mexico, prior

    to Nagasaki and Hiroshima... pt frum Buz

  • Fission may have been around a long time but it generates far more problems than it solves. Its a backward step, not the way forward.

  • Just...don't let any AI control these lasers. We all know what will happen sooner or later if we do so.

  • LOL, i-Robot? NEH.

  • Well, I was thinking about the AI SHODAN from the System Shock series. The I, robot thing is a pat on the back compared to SHODAN.

  • 3 million degrees and the gold doesn't melt?!?!??!

    wtf !?!??!

  • how do u contain 3 million degrees?

  • i think they can hold it stable with magnets.. i could be wrong but i saw something similar on ngc about fusion where they did hold the "thing" stable (like floating and shit):P

  • They generate a magnetic field around it. There's absolute vacuum so heat cannot be transfered, and as long as the magnets hold the greater radiation stable, only small amounts of heat will escape in the form of light.

  • neat, too bad the facility is SO HUGE.

    lmfao. hahaha...always pushing for more.

    the discovery is great, lessons learned aren't supposed to be money grabs, not right away. but such exposure already...ooh ahhh.

  • FEBRUARY 23RD,

    MY BIRTHDAY.

  • Comment removed

  • hmmm.... star wars universe starting soon then?

  • fusen power,yes

  • This can be dangerous if it is uncontrolled. just think of a hydrogen bomb!

  • This needs major funding, claw back the Bank Bailouts.

  • I'd use it to burn ants.

  • You'd make a bundle discovering cold ant fusion

  • @spinmonkey4401 lol so true

  • Herligt - Den har jo de originale Büssing-

    motorer her.

  • they should definatley make a laser cannon..

  • Woah. They're like a step away from creating a LASER CANNON. Beware enemies. Beware..