"Do not take authority your truth; make truth your autority"
Phrenology works very well. I'd say test it yourself instead of blindly following what is copied and copied. The church had a big hand in making phrenology ridiculous, because it would prove the thoughts are seated in the head. The thing is: it works, and has predictive value.
to: togetherforpeace--FUNNY how you can not understand,or try to understand the BIBLE. but if it were a project in University, or learning computers or anything else ,like Medicine, youwould be required to know, try downloading E-sword, it gives the Greek and Hebrew translations, Also David Stern's Jewish Bible. Study, G-d hides nothing,nasty stuff and good stuff, look at all the garbage in History, revealed, He is an HONEST true G-d & loves YOU. see my youtube site-future stuff
PRENOLOGY's not a CHRISTIANSCIENCE,WATCHTOWER adopted it as alternative type science,like iridology/refexology.JEHOVAH witnesses & MORMON's aren't Christian.BOTH BELIeVE JESUS CHRIST is NOT part of G-d,but a"PROPHET" just likeMUSLIMSbelieveJESUSisaPROPHET.Christian's believeG-d's triune~FATHERSONHOLYSPIRIT~&only pray to JESUSCHRIST(not Mary&Saints)but DIRECT to JESUS(who is G-d)That's true definition of Christianity,not HITLER's type(Slaughter of JEWS)G-d's sad over this.
the PROOF of the BIBLE is "PREDICTION" IT is PROVEN by it's HISTORY, in Daniel(example) it fortells the future of Revelation, and even predicts JESUS CHRIST coming, "to HEBREW calendar DATE"... it actually gives up the approximate time of the beginning of the 7 Years Tribulation. so if your an athiest, check it out. your personal "PSYCHIC" is the BIBLE. neat eh??
I'd like examples. When atheists say that they can quote passages of scripture which are wrong and discredit the rest of the bible, why don't they give specific examples of what those passages are? I can guarantee that every single one will have a logical explanation.
The guy who said OT and NT are nothing to do with each other is bizarre ... they cannot be read separately as every later part of the bible references earlier parts!
I hate to say this because I'm an atheist as well, but your example of the physics text book that says gravity doesn't exist is logically flawed. I can't think of the fallacy, but just because its wrong about one thing doesn't mean it won't have the proper equations and theories for other components of physics. It does discredit the books authority on the subject though.
point taken. i forget how i worded it in the video, but it would be correct to assume that if a textbook made a blatantly erroneous statement then the rest of the material would be suspect (while still possibly correct).
Brett Keane says he knows more about the Bibles than Christians and that Christians don't read the Bible. The Old Testament has almost nothing to do with the New Testament. One is the story of Israel; the other is the story of Jesus and early Christianity after his death. So if a Physics book says gravity doesn't exist, do you then doubt your math or chemistry book?
Saying that the two books are different means you HAVEN'T READ the Christian scriptures. The Christian scriptures, or "New Testament" is NOTHING without the OT. It's BASED ON the OT.
If I wrote a psysics book that was BASED ON a book that claimed that gravity didn't exist, we can comfortably dismiss this book as well.
You just proved Brett Keane correct then by saying that the New Testament has almost nothing to do with the Old Testament. You obviously didn't pay attention in your Sundays school.. or wherever the hell you got your info from.
the Bible is a complex book and to merely pick it up and read something from the Old Testament and think to oneself what a horrible mean God Jews and Christians serve is slightly akin to me picking up a T-rex fossil and saying its only a 100yrs old...its ignorance and misunderstanding. thanks for the vid response...peace
"Do not take authority your truth; make truth your autority"
Phrenology works very well. I'd say test it yourself instead of blindly following what is copied and copied. The church had a big hand in making phrenology ridiculous, because it would prove the thoughts are seated in the head. The thing is: it works, and has predictive value.
DoomNoMore 1 year ago
Every time I see the bottle in the BG, and his eyes i think he is drunken..watch his shiny eyes. hum...
heragh 1 year ago
to: togetherforpeace--FUNNY how you can not understand,or try to understand the BIBLE. but if it were a project in University, or learning computers or anything else ,like Medicine, youwould be required to know, try downloading E-sword, it gives the Greek and Hebrew translations, Also David Stern's Jewish Bible. Study, G-d hides nothing,nasty stuff and good stuff, look at all the garbage in History, revealed, He is an HONEST true G-d & loves YOU. see my youtube site-future stuff
alex9nanc 4 years ago
PRENOLOGY's not a CHRISTIANSCIENCE,WATCHTOWER adopted it as alternative type science,like iridology/refexology.JEHOVAH witnesses & MORMON's aren't Christian.BOTH BELIeVE JESUS CHRIST is NOT part of G-d,but a"PROPHET" just likeMUSLIMSbelieveJESUSisaPROPHET.Christian's believeG-d's triune~FATHERSONHOLYSPIRIT~&only pray to JESUSCHRIST(not Mary&Saints)but DIRECT to JESUS(who is G-d)That's true definition of Christianity,not HITLER's type(Slaughter of JEWS)G-d's sad over this.
alex9nanc 4 years ago
the PROOF of the BIBLE is "PREDICTION" IT is PROVEN by it's HISTORY, in Daniel(example) it fortells the future of Revelation, and even predicts JESUS CHRIST coming, "to HEBREW calendar DATE"... it actually gives up the approximate time of the beginning of the 7 Years Tribulation. so if your an athiest, check it out. your personal "PSYCHIC" is the BIBLE. neat eh??
alex9nanc 4 years ago
I'd like examples. When atheists say that they can quote passages of scripture which are wrong and discredit the rest of the bible, why don't they give specific examples of what those passages are? I can guarantee that every single one will have a logical explanation.
The guy who said OT and NT are nothing to do with each other is bizarre ... they cannot be read separately as every later part of the bible references earlier parts!
philoz14 4 years ago
I hate to say this because I'm an atheist as well, but your example of the physics text book that says gravity doesn't exist is logically flawed. I can't think of the fallacy, but just because its wrong about one thing doesn't mean it won't have the proper equations and theories for other components of physics. It does discredit the books authority on the subject though.
shonkey 4 years ago
point taken. i forget how i worded it in the video, but it would be correct to assume that if a textbook made a blatantly erroneous statement then the rest of the material would be suspect (while still possibly correct).
RunDX7 4 years ago
Brett Keane says he knows more about the Bibles than Christians and that Christians don't read the Bible. The Old Testament has almost nothing to do with the New Testament. One is the story of Israel; the other is the story of Jesus and early Christianity after his death. So if a Physics book says gravity doesn't exist, do you then doubt your math or chemistry book?
Matur1n 4 years ago
I would if they were published in the same volume under the same title.
RunDX7 4 years ago
Saying that the two books are different means you HAVEN'T READ the Christian scriptures. The Christian scriptures, or "New Testament" is NOTHING without the OT. It's BASED ON the OT.
If I wrote a psysics book that was BASED ON a book that claimed that gravity didn't exist, we can comfortably dismiss this book as well.
socratesone 4 years ago
You just proved Brett Keane correct then by saying that the New Testament has almost nothing to do with the Old Testament. You obviously didn't pay attention in your Sundays school.. or wherever the hell you got your info from.
Golfina 4 years ago
the Bible is a complex book and to merely pick it up and read something from the Old Testament and think to oneself what a horrible mean God Jews and Christians serve is slightly akin to me picking up a T-rex fossil and saying its only a 100yrs old...its ignorance and misunderstanding. thanks for the vid response...peace
TogetherForPeace 4 years ago