100% of the folks currently residing on this Earth believe in gravity. The same 100% of people have utterly contradicting ideas about god. This stupidity of this call collapses under its own weight..
@Elusive7thElement IMDb lists 3 movies that go by that title, none of which I think I have seen. But I take it it's the quirky, insane but likably so, type of character. Bit of a lad and probably in his mid 30's..
The Atheist Experience team are a bunch of hypocrites; they don't want reasoned sensible discussion or debate; if you make any relevant point they end up blocking you; clearly they just want the fundie fruitcake calling who will only be aware of this idiotic reductive literalist extreme interpretation of the Bible; this is old hat; debated down the centuries; they offer nothing new, only extremism and they become the same as the people they accuse
@Elusive7thElement Don't put words in my mouth! I said God wants you to believe in him without evidence. Where do you see "people" and "should" in my sentence?
gravity is NOT a force that is pulling u down. its warped space that pushes u down. einstein discovered this. it was also proven by taking pictures of a total lunar eclipse, and seeing that the light from the stars around/behind the sun were curving around it(because the space around the sun is warped-hence, gravity)
@Phx8ball602 But that still isn't an explanation of gravity. It's just a better description of the effect it has. Personally, I think it's just a flaw in some elaborate equation no one actually bothered to draw up. But that's just me...
@KeusFrench "Yet if one was to claim that they could see the effects of God, oftentimes people would refute this and deny it as evidence for the existence of it."
Not at all. Gravity ONLY explains the effects of gravity (that's what it is--it's effects). The "effects" of god look exactly like no god (confirmation bias, group think, magical thinking, etc). The effects of gravity do NOT look exactly like no gravity. People who don't believe in gravity fall just the same.
@KeusFrench What we call "gravity" is the effects of the phenomenon in reality. All of those effects together is what we call collectively "gravity". This isn't irrelevant, you just didn't understand what I said.
Second, I would accept a particular god if there were as much mutually confirming pieces of evidence for he/she/it as there are for gravity, and that the god explanation was the simplest explanation in the same way gravity is the simplest for the effects of gravity.
@KeusFrench The existence of things are evidence that things exist. They are not evidence of a god.
Again, all the "effects" of gravity are actually what gravity IS. There isn't something separate from falling things and warped space-time that just HAPPENS to make things fall and warp space-time.
The effects of gravity do not look exactly like no gravity.
The effects of your "god" look exactly like no god.
If you think there is evidence of miracles, please submit a falsifiable experiment to James Randi and claim your million dollars. You can give it to any charity of your choice.
The evidence of "miracles" looks exactly like confirmation bias, rare events that happen anyway, group think, hysteria, pareidolia, trickery, magical thinking, and wishful thinking. We can control for these to find which of these it is, and thus far it is always one of them.
@KeusFrench The effects of god? Oh you mean when a paralysed person comes out of surgery and they walk again, that's the effect of god? When somebody crash lands in the middle of a jungle, but makes their way out and survives, it's the effect of god? I wonder why anyone that is intelligent enough to be even called human, doesn't think that is proof of god. Seriously, you religious morons are so pathetically stupid that you are literally sub-human.
@oBLACKIECHANoo Actually yes. How would you know if a man who survives a plane crash wasn't guided by God? You'd probably say it was luck, or coincidence. But that does not mean God didn't play a hand in it - you CAN'T know for certain. And as for other things (effects), there are unexpected miracles that occur, the whole universe is an example, and how about the entirety of nature? And the complexity of design that simply points to God and NOT coincidence?
@KeusFrench HAHAHA, See what I mean? You're pathetically idiotic, "derp, I can't explain something so obviously, god did it, a god that has NO proof for it's existence, or even any evidence. The universe isn't an example, neither is nature, and neither is the complexity of things,
@oBLACKIECHANoo I don't appreciate the name calling, sir. Answer me this: is there any proof against God? Wait, that's a rhetorical question. Of course there isn't.
This instigates my next question: how is the universe, nature, and the complexity of things NOT proof of design?
@KeusFrench How is it not proof of design? Because we can easily explain most of it using science, we can explain how and why everything happened, the only thing that we can't explain, including your idiotic religion, is how the universe began. And there is no definitive proof, but there is thousands of pieces of evidence against any known god. But I doubt you understand the difference between evidence and proof. Now, why don't you tell me why you don't believe in thor?
Anyways, did you know that God created science? Isn't it wonderful? I find it funny and quite ironic that people use science against God.
I digress. Your statement still doesn't prove anything against God or creation for that matter. You said we can explain things with science. You can explain the universe? No. Nature? No. You can explain things inside nature but how it all came to be. Explaining complexity does not take it away.
@KeusFrench You realise that evolution is a proven fact? Oh ye, you're not that educated. All you have done here is prove just how uneducated you are. Something tells me you can't even tell me what the most important element there is for life. You don't even understand the most basic things about the subject, any 14yr old that has finished a science class can tell you that hair colour, skin colour, body shape and everything like it, is a mutation, evolution is mutation, look it up.
@KeusFrench No, I am not missing your points, you just fail to make sense or have ignored anything I have said that proves that point wrong, yet you keep repeating it.
1. I don't accept lies that are called facts by the religious although they have less evidence and proof for it than anything in the scientific world does.
2. What? Being able to comprehend a complex idea, means you comprehend a complex idea, but that has nothing to do with anything here at all and doesn't even make sense.
@KeusFrench Human evolution isn't true? Like I said, evolution is mutation, everything about us is different to any other human, because of mutation. Eye colour is a mutation, along with hair and skin colour, and everything else about our bodies. Cancer is a mutation, downs syndrome is a mutation, so is thousands of other things. If anything about us mutates, then we did evolve. Not to mention the fact that we share an insane amount of dna with every animal. We share 96% of our dna with chimps.
@oBLACKIECHANoo Okay... to me, God is real, and therefore He created science. To you, He isn't and therefore He didn't. We shall have to agree to disagree here.
As for what I was saying before; I was arguing that the complexity of things points to design and not just random chance. It makes plenty of sense if you read back.
And wow! 96% is quite a bit, to be honest. But we aren't chimps. We're humans. There was no common ancestor, either, for that matter. It's irrelevant, too.
@KeusFrench No, the complexity of things points to billions of years of evolution, but because of how complex that is, you are unable to understand it, and therefore just say a god did it, because you're scared of reality. And there is plenty of common ancestors with primates, again, if you was educated on the matter or did any research, you would know this.
@KeusFrench Reality isn't something that can be qualified with "to me".
Complexity is ONLY the addition of many simpler things, and is only relative to conscious observers trying to understand it.
The junk DNA in chimps and humans confirms we are related by a common ancestor. We know how DNA is passed along. Chimps and humans are proven to be related just like a paternity test proves who the father of the child is, doofus.
@KeusFrench "I was arguing that the complexity of things points to design and not just random chance"
If you study the questions involved, you are starting with a lot of erroneous assumptions to think "random chance" is what anyone is claiming. Evolution by natural selection is not random chance. The entire universe did not "randomly" spring from a Big Bang that was floating in Absolute Space and Absolute Time ex nihilo. No on is claiming that. Stop pretending they are.
Facts are demonstrable in reality. That's what make them facts. Care to demonstrate that god created science? The claim is absurd on its face, and betrays an egregious lack of understanding WHAT SCIENCE IS. Science is a process, not a set of absolute conclusions. No conclusions in science are absolute. Science is always dependent upon new experiments and new observations.
Thus "science" is not something that CAN be created, by anything. Doofus.
@KeusFrench We can explain the universe to a very high degree. I take it you haven't studied this question very closely? All the gravity in the universe exactly balances with all the matter and energy. What does that mean? It means the universe is uncaused and the result of quantum fluctuations, quantum fluctuations that are not contingent on space-time (hence not contingent on causes and effects). We know even more about nature. You should really enter the 19th century.
@KeusFrench "This instigates my next question: how is the universe, nature, and the complexity of things NOT proof of design?"
It's not even evidence. To be evidence, you have to distinguish what a nondesigned universe would look like to compare it to a designed one. If you can't do that, you are just making things up. If the universe WERE designed, we shouldn't be more and more successful within it by looking at the evidence, evidence that says it was NOT designed.
@KeusFrench "But that does not mean God didn't play a hand in it - you CAN'T know for certain."
You can't know ANYTHING for certain. But if you are going to make these claims, you are going to have to distinguish between random chance and "god's hand". If you can't, you are just making things up. The person next to you can say Santa did it, and the person next to them can say Extra-Dimensional beings did it, and it all looks the same as "god's hand"--ie, nothing at all.
have you ever noticed how so many people believe in the bible. although there is no ACTUAL evidance. NO EVIDANCE what so ever.
they say we should believe in something that there is no evidance for, that sounds a bit stupid. the only evidance is the imagination in your mind, which is not even evidance.
Science is based on evidance, everything. a scientist doesnt say. woah look at that sun, we'll just say its a huge orange coloured man in the sky.
He @village1diot i see you reply to comments, im and atheist and would love to speak with matt dillahunty. Do you know where i could find his email address please
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't believe gravity is constant outside of belief or deception. You could weigh yourself alone on various scales for years and conclude your body weight is say.. 220 pounds fairly consistently. But then get a doctor and a couple nurses to weigh you and the scale could read 265 and you will now have to summon your reality or summon your belief to be stronger than their faith in their practice or will to deceive in order for it to line up with your lived experience. So No to gravity. :)
@village1diot So does one persons belief and understanding having been conferred by multiple measuring devices trump 3 other persons and their 1 protocol of measurement? Does one hold authority over the other?
Also we can add incompetence or human error into the equation. If the question involves or resolves with "properly functioning equipment" then I'm curious about the aspect of a persons unquestioned or unflinching faith in their "equipment" or measuring device. Interesting to talk about.
@aerotrooper whaaa?? weight is determined by gravity. gravity is constant. The only variable that can change your weight weight is your mass. Weight=(Gravity)x(Mass). If your weight increases by 45 lbs that means your mass increased by 4.6 lbs, gravity didn't do it because gravity stays constant at 9.8 meters/second^2.
Or, as village1diot pointed out, it was a faulty scale.
@hardxxcorey Couple things wrong with your comment.
First, weight/mass are not the only variables. You weigh less on the moon, or at the top of Everest than you do at sea level. Distance from a gravitational field also affects your weight.
Second, mass is not measured in lbs, lbs is weight. Mass is measured in grams.
Third, 9.8m/s^2 is not "gravity", nor is it constant. It is the acceleration caused by Earth's gravitational pull near sea level (and only near sea level) in a vacuum.
@Fortune2point0 lbs can be a mass. 1 lb=453.59 grams, it's a simple conversion. lbs are usually a measurement of weight, but that doesn't mean they're restricted to that. Just as grams are a common measurement of mass, but don't always measure mass (nor are grams the only measurement of mass). Grams can also be a weight--there are scales that measure WEIGHT in GRAMS.
And yes, you're right that gravity isn't always 9.8m/s^2, but for the sake of aerotrooper's omment it was.
@hardxxcorey No. 453.59 grams = 1lb on Earth at sea level, significantly less on say, the moon, and it would be a bit less on Everest. Mass is not weight, they are related though. Grams are not used for weight, grams are a measure of mass. Those scales measure mass, not weight. And what else is used to measure mass other than grams?
@aerotrooper Dude, you can not be serious! I hope you are trolling for your own sake, If not pick up and read a book, ANY book in the NON-FICTION section.
It amazes me the length that people will go to not disturb there way of thinking. I think its a talent to be so logical and critical minded you can have an understanding that most cannot comprehend. I cannot paint a picture but i can most certainly think logically & critically. Its a curse sometimes BC people that cannot understand dont. Its not like a painting i can pull out and show how much better of a painter i am. more like if i had to explain how to paint without a canvas
idk why christians have such a hard time understanding. it wasent hard for me to see evidence and go "yep my faith is bs" it wasent that important, it never was, even as a christian i seen no help or understanding from "god" only stories. stories despite how good or heroic "some" were they was not enough to make me believe, bushs burn and talk, snakes talk, man came from dirt, woman came from a rib, and god snapped his fingers and we sprang from the ground. its all clearly bs.
I you wanted to give God the same validity as gravity, first He'd have to be real, and second, He'd need to have a demonstrable effect on all things. The only thing the two have in common is invisibility.
@ChipArgyle Maybe he does have a demonstrable effect on all things, we are just not recognizing it. Remember it took Newton who is a genius to even recognize something as recognizable as gravity...
@PhilLankford Everybody saw and felt the effects of gravity, we just hadn't quantified it until Newton came around. Is there some kind of God effect out there that everyone is experiencing that we just haven't named or quantified yet? It's a stretch.
@ChipArgyle There's a lot of effects out there that we are experiencing that we haven't named or quantified. A lot of our psychological problems stem from us experiencing something that we can't really put our finger on it. And its either because we don't know, or interestingly enough it's because we don't want to know.. That's why with respect to God and psychology there is a level of acceptance that has to happen..
@PhilLankford Right. So with this Physics, Business, and whatever degree all you do is sit on your ass and post YouTube comments all day? Go away loser.
@PhilLankford That's a big eureka for you! You've found it. This God effect you're searching for must be the cause of all those psychological problems.
You actually can't quantify gravity... Listening to this atheist jabber on like he knows anything about physics is just amusing.. Here is a real physicist Michio Kaku talking about science and gravity and God. And he's not nearly as confident in science as much as you atheist are.. It won't let me post the link so search this on YouTube
"Science vs God : It's The Collapse Of Physics As We Know It"
@PhilLankford "We do, but that doesn't mean we are good at it.." Why aren't we good at it? Even if we aren't great at it, do you have a better way of trying to understand things? Saying "if I let go of this, it will fall" is an example of quantifying gravity... how can you say we "can't" do that? What is the complaint there?
@bzu1040171 More of an explanation. And that equation only works in one place in the universe, if you are falling through the sky in earths atmosphere. But that does not mean you know what gravity is or what causes it..
@PhilLankford hay true, we don't know what "causes" gravity or how does it occur, and I'm an agnostic to the matter
I'm sure of the effect of gravity that I don't see but can quantify and predict
frankly, it sure is amusing if their is some weird wave function that causes subatomic particles composed of vibrating energy string to cause the manifestation of the gravitational force that we see. but that I don't believe and don't blame anyone who doesn't believe.
@pythor2 We put those units and value to it. But sometimes those unit are not right. The math isn't even consistent in our own solar system. Mercurys orbit around the sun is different than all the other planets and our mathematics can't explain it. It wasn't tell relativity that we knew that it was the suns bending of space time that creates its orbit. But relativity isn't consistent in the universe either, the units break down in black holes..
@PhilLankford Okay. So we don't know a little about the universe. So what? We know the effects of gravity on a large scale, most if not all applies to us.
@pythor2 That is true we do know the effects but we don't know what causes the effects. First it was a mechanical force, then it was relativity, now we don't really know. And figuring that out is the future. We have barely scraped the surface of how it applies to us. Yes we use gravity to to harness power from rivers, but imagine what the possibilities will be when we can know on a quantum scale and galactic scale what gravity really is. It will make the impossible possible..
@PhilLankford So, basically, it's a "Why does gravity work" instead of a "How does gravity work" question. This is a bigger theme that scientists don't tackle, and instead leave it to philosophers. Saying that we can't quantify a "why" is a ridiculously meager attempt at discrediting scientific fact.
@PhilLankford Reason constantly undermines and reconstructs knowledge. That is how it works. Michio Kaku has confidence in science. He also has humility. If there is not an answer there is not an answer. How does that necessitate god? Tell me where god comes in? By the way none of that suggests that gravity is not observable. It shows that at extremes what we know of gravity can totally change. The clip opens up with the explanation of just that. Still, where is observable evidence of god?
@GenghisCohen1 Im glad you actually watched the video. I am not denying that gravity isn't observable, I'm simply saying that we do not have a logical explanation for what it is we are observing. We know how it relates to us, but not nearly to its full extent. Michio Kaku humility is where god comes into play, he knows that even with all the science in the world you are still only looking through the looking glass, at something greater than yourself.
@PhilLankford "he knows that even with all the science in the world you are still only looking through the looking glass, at something greater than yourself." This idea means nothing in the quest to try to understand the universe. It doesn't add information. All you're saying is that "we could be wrong." No kidding? Science is trying to explain observable phenomenon, which is always going to be relative to our understanding of the universe at the time.
@TheIncognitusMe By looking glass I mean we can know everything there is to know but we will always be looking at it through the human condition. And we will never have a true un-biased third person perspective of what is really going on.
@PhilLankford I'm sure modern medicine would benefit greatly from accepting the fact that their medicine might be flawed, even though it helps save people's lives daily. Maybe instead of using their knowledge to save lives, they'll just keep their medical breakthroughs to themselves until they become metaphysical super beings who know for a fact how the universe works.
@TheIncognitusMe My grandpa was a medical doctor, He would agree with you that he is only practicing medicine and that it is not perfect. But the funny thing is he you to say he could do a perfect jobs in surgery but he could only do so much, the rest is left up to God..
@PhilLankford "we will never have a true un-biased third person perspective of what is really going on." Understanding things beyond what we are capable of experiencing is obviously impossible, and it is not useful to have that information, since it has nothing to do with is. What's your point?
"he could do a perfect jobs in surgery but he could only do so much, the rest is left up to God..." The rest is left up to the patient's body, and the effectiveness of the treatment. But I digress.
@TheIncognitusMe I propose we amend U.S. state constitutions one by one via popular vote to ban creationists from the use of microwave ovens until they accept the knowledge of which they reap the benefit of.
@xTheuglytruthx From an observable field gravity is best explained by relativity the bending of space time. But Einstein's relativity does not explain black holes and the math only works up to big bang. So we know what gravity is but we don't know its origins and we can't observe it origins which is maybe some unknown quantum energy that exist beyond our known universe..
@PhilLankford I have tried to answer you so many times with what i want to say. Every time i do though, my windows keeps fucking up and i have to delete everything i have written in reply, so, im going to try and reply with what i was going to say at a later date because right now! my PC is about to go into the trash!! why have i been able to write all of this?....I have no fucking idea!! it's giving me the shits though...goodnite and peace out!
@PhilLankford You obviously have a very limited Wikipedia-based knowledge of science. Watching two videos by Michio Kaku on YouTube doesn't make you an expert on anything relating to science, gravity, or humility.
@AcruxSolus My grandpa was a medical doctor, My father has his Phd in History and philosophy and runs his own Charity. And I have a degree in Physics, Philosophy and Business Finance. But your right about one thing. My knowledge of Wikipedia is limited. I tend to stick with books.
@PhilLankford I actually watched that video....all it says is that there are some things in Physics we don't fully understand. Not a single word about an Invisible Man In The Sky.
@Jayhc19 You're right cause sleeping in and watching football is so much more productive than spending your Sundays with friends and family who are simply trying to become better people.
@PhilLankford i dont sleep in on sundays, your first mistake is assuming atheists are slobs that waste away their time, personally i know this is the only life i get and i make the most of it. plus i live in ireland so football aint on until 1am on sundays here lol
@PhilLankford He is confident so what? He is right about everything he mentioned. Not being able to observe effects is another way of saying that their is nothing to observe
This video made me stop believing in gravity. Tomorrow, I'm gonna float to school, and I don't care what anyone says about it. Haters gonna hate, right?
But see, thats an atheists problem. You can back up gravity with evidence by dropping a pen. But when it comes to believing in a spiritual entity that science isn't capable of proving yet, then it's completely unbelievable. Lol, Yet, many of us believers have experience and experience with this deity and you will not believe it until science proves it to you. The only reasonable argument to you atheists is if science can explain it. If it doesn't , then we are all out of our minds.
@Tom6093 What if your "experiences" can be explained by science. What if these experience are caused by chemicals and electric pulses and visual hallucinations of your brain? The only way to prove that God exist is if God himself claims responsibility to your experiences. He needs to announce his presence and will to ALL humankind alike. Which is clearly not the case, given the dizzying amount of religions as well as christian denominations in the world.
@thelaw986 Remember though, Religions are just the way people inturprate and make up customs to worship who they feel God is. I personally believe There is only one true God that has many different names, excliuding the Greek Myth Gods. They are known Myth. God is different to people in in mainstream Christianity, Cathloc, and Jewish Denominations. Even Buddism, Hinduism have some of the same traights. God means something different for everyone one...
@thelaw986 The brain is very complex.. I know the mind can make you feel things. I know the chemicals and the emotions they give. But this is more.......alot more then chemicals. As crazy as it sounds...Until you open your mind and heart and soul,, you will never experience it...trust me....
@Tom6093 God of the Bible does not need people to "open his or her mind" to experience him. Take the example with Adam, Lot, Cain and Abel, people of Sodom and Gomorrah; these people had direct contact and CONVERSATIONS with God. Can you think of a recent example in the news where a person talks to God is commanded by God?
@thelaw986 It's all about prayer and faith these days. Critical atheists might look at it from the stand point that it all sounds crazy, But when your heart is closed and you live for the world, It isn't possible. You turn your back on God, don't expect a blessing or visit, we go to him first, then he finds us. Science won't find God. He won't be found by world standards.
@Tom6093 "My belief is God is all forgiving." You are inputting your own ideas into what God is here. In the bible, God's actions in the old testament shows he is not very forgiving.
@Tom6093 Also, in the Bible, people who do not obey God just DIE! He does not wait to punish people. He kills them immediately. There are tons of sinners now in the world who DEFY God is more ways than people of Sodom and Gomorrah, and do they get fire and brimstone. Nope. So tell me, has the so called "eternal" God CHANGED?
@thelaw986 You sure your not part of the West Baptist Church ? My belief is God is all forgiving. As long as we repent and do his will. He understands we aren't perfect. God doesn't send anyone to hell. We send ourselfs there. It's your choice whether you agree with what this world tells you whats logical and possible, deny your maker and send yourself to hell or open your heart and spirit , throw caution to the wind and experience true love ,Grace and compassion. Then enemy blind you
@PhilLankford I disagree. Society now is way more fucked up than back in the old days. God is either 1. hiding from his creations 2. never existed to begin with. Option 2 is the correct answer.
i am atheist but but but but but,,,,,,,,,, i think if a religion can give someone hope ,faith ,love thats good for the people to follow if they want to ,,,,,, just imagine can u or anyone in this world can give hope to someone who has suffered emotionally and mentally,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,what will give them hope that everything will be all right ???????? ........if it has to come from any religion i think everyone will not mind and we all will agree
hats off to this fucking man
jeffattass 12 hours ago
Easy answer is that gravity is the pucker or warp of space time by matter. Planets suns galaxies, all matter even us, warp space around us.
krapptacular 18 hours ago
100% of the folks currently residing on this Earth believe in gravity. The same 100% of people have utterly contradicting ideas about god. This stupidity of this call collapses under its own weight..
namnack 1 day ago
@namnack
I totally agree with you
internet high-five!.....um how do i.....nevermind
Lol, have you seen movie arthur?
im a bit like him
Elusive7thElement 1 day ago
@Elusive7thElement IMDb lists 3 movies that go by that title, none of which I think I have seen. But I take it it's the quirky, insane but likably so, type of character. Bit of a lad and probably in his mid 30's..
namnack 1 day ago
@namnack
thats the one
Elusive7thElement 23 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Atheist Experience team are a bunch of hypocrites; they don't want reasoned sensible discussion or debate; if you make any relevant point they end up blocking you; clearly they just want the fundie fruitcake calling who will only be aware of this idiotic reductive literalist extreme interpretation of the Bible; this is old hat; debated down the centuries; they offer nothing new, only extremism and they become the same as the people they accuse
no1hoopsman 4 days ago
It's clear from the Bible that God wants you to believe in him without any evidence.
kokalti 5 days ago
@kokalti
then why does he tell people to believe in him in the bible?
Elusive7thElement 3 days ago
@Elusive7thElement you tell me
kokalti 3 days ago
@kokalti
^\(0_o)/^
my point was that christians use the bible as evidence of god
yet you said people should believe in god without evidence
so........?
Elusive7thElement 2 days ago
@Elusive7thElement Don't put words in my mouth! I said God wants you to believe in him without evidence. Where do you see "people" and "should" in my sentence?
kokalti 2 days ago
@kokalti
touchy, touchy grammer nazi,
ill rewrite:
My point was that christians use the bible as evidence of god
Yet you said 'god wants you to believe in him without any evidence'
happy now?
Elusive7thElement 1 day ago
@Elusive7thElement hahaha dude you're an idiot, I was just making a statement and you are trying to make an argument about it. I don't even believe.
kokalti 1 day ago
@kokalti
Why so much hate?
No need here for the silly games.
so your not a christian, you were pointing out that according to christianity god wants people to believe in him without evidence?
even in that case my argument is still valid to christians who say that
so completely removing you from the equation:
christians use the bible as evidence of god
yet god expects people to believe in him without evidence
they is funny
Elusive7thElement 1 day ago
@Elusive7thElement grammar*
:D
namnack 1 day ago
@namnack
:D
Elusive7thElement 23 hours ago
@Elusive7thElement Do your bosses know what you are doing all day in here?
namnack 1 day ago
@namnack
i dont have bosses........i get income via shares in a family company that i earned myself
Elusive7thElement 1 day ago
@Elusive7thElement Then your boss is..you! That's quite sexy.
namnack 1 day ago
@namnack
i had an affair with my boss...........*trollface*
Elusive7thElement 1 day ago
@Elusive7thElement Since you said it was a family business, I won't ask. You perverts..
namnack 1 day ago
@namnack
Contractors to firms like honeywell and expirion
System engineering
Elusive7thElement 23 hours ago
@namnack
as far as im aware its impossible to have an affair with yourself?
hence the trollface
Elusive7thElement 23 hours ago
How come it's so easy to know that someone is a nutcase just from their voice?
rmpumper 1 week ago
@rmpumper Because you are a racist..
:-)
namnack 1 day ago
@Phx8ball602 excuse me, its suppose to say SOLAR eclipse.
Phx8ball602 1 week ago
gravity is NOT a force that is pulling u down. its warped space that pushes u down. einstein discovered this. it was also proven by taking pictures of a total lunar eclipse, and seeing that the light from the stars around/behind the sun were curving around it(because the space around the sun is warped-hence, gravity)
Phx8ball602 1 week ago
@Phx8ball602 But that still isn't an explanation of gravity. It's just a better description of the effect it has. Personally, I think it's just a flaw in some elaborate equation no one actually bothered to draw up. But that's just me...
namnack 1 day ago
Tune in next week when a pastafarian argues against gravity because it is “just” a “theory” like evolution
BaneOfAzrael 1 week ago
Black people......
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
"You can see the effects of gravity".
This is an answer and evidence for the theory of gravity and hence, gravity in itself. It is an accepted theory because we see the effects.
Yet if one was to claim that they could see the effects of God, oftentimes people would refute this and deny it as evidence for the existence of it.
You cannot do this. It is accepting one claim yet denying the other out of pure spite. It is wrong, unscientific and hypocritical.
KeusFrench 2 weeks ago
@KeusFrench "Yet if one was to claim that they could see the effects of God, oftentimes people would refute this and deny it as evidence for the existence of it."
Not at all. Gravity ONLY explains the effects of gravity (that's what it is--it's effects). The "effects" of god look exactly like no god (confirmation bias, group think, magical thinking, etc). The effects of gravity do NOT look exactly like no gravity. People who don't believe in gravity fall just the same.
greyeyed123 2 weeks ago
@greyeyed123 that is irrelevant. Keep it to my post, please. I said that if one was see the effects of God, people would refute this as evidence.
You're telling me that gravity is only 'effects' and not an actual basis? Either that or I'm terribly confused at your obscure wording.
KeusFrench 1 week ago
@KeusFrench What we call "gravity" is the effects of the phenomenon in reality. All of those effects together is what we call collectively "gravity". This isn't irrelevant, you just didn't understand what I said.
Second, I would accept a particular god if there were as much mutually confirming pieces of evidence for he/she/it as there are for gravity, and that the god explanation was the simplest explanation in the same way gravity is the simplest for the effects of gravity.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
@greyeyed123 Okay so basically you're refuting the earth, nature, the universe, miracles, etc etc. as the effects of God and hence His existence?
So back to main point - you're proving my statement.
KeusFrench 1 week ago
@KeusFrench The existence of things are evidence that things exist. They are not evidence of a god.
Again, all the "effects" of gravity are actually what gravity IS. There isn't something separate from falling things and warped space-time that just HAPPENS to make things fall and warp space-time.
The effects of gravity do not look exactly like no gravity.
The effects of your "god" look exactly like no god.
The effects of gravity are falsifiable.
The "effects" of your god are not.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
@KeusFrench "miracles"
If you think there is evidence of miracles, please submit a falsifiable experiment to James Randi and claim your million dollars. You can give it to any charity of your choice.
The evidence of "miracles" looks exactly like confirmation bias, rare events that happen anyway, group think, hysteria, pareidolia, trickery, magical thinking, and wishful thinking. We can control for these to find which of these it is, and thus far it is always one of them.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
@KeusFrench The effects of god? Oh you mean when a paralysed person comes out of surgery and they walk again, that's the effect of god? When somebody crash lands in the middle of a jungle, but makes their way out and survives, it's the effect of god? I wonder why anyone that is intelligent enough to be even called human, doesn't think that is proof of god. Seriously, you religious morons are so pathetically stupid that you are literally sub-human.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo Actually yes. How would you know if a man who survives a plane crash wasn't guided by God? You'd probably say it was luck, or coincidence. But that does not mean God didn't play a hand in it - you CAN'T know for certain. And as for other things (effects), there are unexpected miracles that occur, the whole universe is an example, and how about the entirety of nature? And the complexity of design that simply points to God and NOT coincidence?
KeusFrench 1 week ago
@KeusFrench HAHAHA, See what I mean? You're pathetically idiotic, "derp, I can't explain something so obviously, god did it, a god that has NO proof for it's existence, or even any evidence. The universe isn't an example, neither is nature, and neither is the complexity of things,
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo I don't appreciate the name calling, sir. Answer me this: is there any proof against God? Wait, that's a rhetorical question. Of course there isn't.
This instigates my next question: how is the universe, nature, and the complexity of things NOT proof of design?
KeusFrench 1 week ago
@KeusFrench How is it not proof of design? Because we can easily explain most of it using science, we can explain how and why everything happened, the only thing that we can't explain, including your idiotic religion, is how the universe began. And there is no definitive proof, but there is thousands of pieces of evidence against any known god. But I doubt you understand the difference between evidence and proof. Now, why don't you tell me why you don't believe in thor?
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo haha you're quite the jester.
Anyways, did you know that God created science? Isn't it wonderful? I find it funny and quite ironic that people use science against God.
I digress. Your statement still doesn't prove anything against God or creation for that matter. You said we can explain things with science. You can explain the universe? No. Nature? No. You can explain things inside nature but how it all came to be. Explaining complexity does not take it away.
KeusFrench 1 week ago
@KeusFrench You realise that evolution is a proven fact? Oh ye, you're not that educated. All you have done here is prove just how uneducated you are. Something tells me you can't even tell me what the most important element there is for life. You don't even understand the most basic things about the subject, any 14yr old that has finished a science class can tell you that hair colour, skin colour, body shape and everything like it, is a mutation, evolution is mutation, look it up.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo And now you're avoiding my points. Bravo, sir, you're an excellent representation of what an ignoramus is.
1. You still haven't accepted the FACT that God created science.
2. You still haven't explained how the comprehension of a complex idea takes away it's complexity, or anything near the birth of the universe/nature.
Evolution is fact. Yes, I agree. Human evolution is not fact, however. Yet regardless of this, evolution doesn't disprove God! Funny, eh? LOL.
KeusFrench 1 week ago
@KeusFrench No, I am not missing your points, you just fail to make sense or have ignored anything I have said that proves that point wrong, yet you keep repeating it.
1. I don't accept lies that are called facts by the religious although they have less evidence and proof for it than anything in the scientific world does.
2. What? Being able to comprehend a complex idea, means you comprehend a complex idea, but that has nothing to do with anything here at all and doesn't even make sense.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
@KeusFrench Human evolution isn't true? Like I said, evolution is mutation, everything about us is different to any other human, because of mutation. Eye colour is a mutation, along with hair and skin colour, and everything else about our bodies. Cancer is a mutation, downs syndrome is a mutation, so is thousands of other things. If anything about us mutates, then we did evolve. Not to mention the fact that we share an insane amount of dna with every animal. We share 96% of our dna with chimps.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo Okay... to me, God is real, and therefore He created science. To you, He isn't and therefore He didn't. We shall have to agree to disagree here.
As for what I was saying before; I was arguing that the complexity of things points to design and not just random chance. It makes plenty of sense if you read back.
And wow! 96% is quite a bit, to be honest. But we aren't chimps. We're humans. There was no common ancestor, either, for that matter. It's irrelevant, too.
KeusFrench 1 week ago
@KeusFrench No, the complexity of things points to billions of years of evolution, but because of how complex that is, you are unable to understand it, and therefore just say a god did it, because you're scared of reality. And there is plenty of common ancestors with primates, again, if you was educated on the matter or did any research, you would know this.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
@KeusFrench Reality isn't something that can be qualified with "to me".
Complexity is ONLY the addition of many simpler things, and is only relative to conscious observers trying to understand it.
The junk DNA in chimps and humans confirms we are related by a common ancestor. We know how DNA is passed along. Chimps and humans are proven to be related just like a paternity test proves who the father of the child is, doofus.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
@KeusFrench "I was arguing that the complexity of things points to design and not just random chance"
If you study the questions involved, you are starting with a lot of erroneous assumptions to think "random chance" is what anyone is claiming. Evolution by natural selection is not random chance. The entire universe did not "randomly" spring from a Big Bang that was floating in Absolute Space and Absolute Time ex nihilo. No on is claiming that. Stop pretending they are.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
Facts are demonstrable in reality. That's what make them facts. Care to demonstrate that god created science? The claim is absurd on its face, and betrays an egregious lack of understanding WHAT SCIENCE IS. Science is a process, not a set of absolute conclusions. No conclusions in science are absolute. Science is always dependent upon new experiments and new observations.
Thus "science" is not something that CAN be created, by anything. Doofus.
Human evolution is a fact.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
@KeusFrench We can explain the universe to a very high degree. I take it you haven't studied this question very closely? All the gravity in the universe exactly balances with all the matter and energy. What does that mean? It means the universe is uncaused and the result of quantum fluctuations, quantum fluctuations that are not contingent on space-time (hence not contingent on causes and effects). We know even more about nature. You should really enter the 19th century.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
@KeusFrench "This instigates my next question: how is the universe, nature, and the complexity of things NOT proof of design?"
It's not even evidence. To be evidence, you have to distinguish what a nondesigned universe would look like to compare it to a designed one. If you can't do that, you are just making things up. If the universe WERE designed, we shouldn't be more and more successful within it by looking at the evidence, evidence that says it was NOT designed.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
@KeusFrench "But that does not mean God didn't play a hand in it - you CAN'T know for certain."
You can't know ANYTHING for certain. But if you are going to make these claims, you are going to have to distinguish between random chance and "god's hand". If you can't, you are just making things up. The person next to you can say Santa did it, and the person next to them can say Extra-Dimensional beings did it, and it all looks the same as "god's hand"--ie, nothing at all.
greyeyed123 1 week ago
What an idiot! I just can't believe somebody is this STUPID!! Jesus Christ, this is so embarassing...
kadene2 2 weeks ago
I applaud them for even answering that stupid ass question?
sepiasiren 2 weeks ago
have you ever noticed how so many people believe in the bible. although there is no ACTUAL evidance. NO EVIDANCE what so ever.
they say we should believe in something that there is no evidance for, that sounds a bit stupid. the only evidance is the imagination in your mind, which is not even evidance.
Science is based on evidance, everything. a scientist doesnt say. woah look at that sun, we'll just say its a huge orange coloured man in the sky.
scientist investigate.
belief = imagination
kazmanli 2 weeks ago
@kazmanli I agree with you, but what is this EVIDANCE? Go look up the proper spelling.
kadene2 2 weeks ago
@kazmanli
Can you teach me how to evi dance?
maxisking2 5 days ago
WOOOW So many people are dead wrong about basic gravity theory here! Mass is not weight you morons... -_-
chriss0008 2 weeks ago 2
Lmao
Me: Do you believe in gravity?
Caller: I believe in everything. I believe in God.
Me: Come here. I have this invisible house I would like to sell you. Wonder Woman use to live in it....
AK33M 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you like to debate for or against religion, please visit me new site :)
religiousdebates.co.uk
fletchernibiru 3 weeks ago
LOL Matt had hair here, hehe
CaptCamping 3 weeks ago
He @village1diot i see you reply to comments, im and atheist and would love to speak with matt dillahunty. Do you know where i could find his email address please
thanks
06goldman06 3 weeks ago
You don't "believe" gravity exists, you KNOW it does.
KyaputenFarukon 3 weeks ago
Everybody knows there's no gravity....the world just sucks.
gspendlove 4 weeks ago 17
The fact that Matt even had to say anythihg about the original call is sad, and a little scary.
5jerry1 4 weeks ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't believe gravity is constant outside of belief or deception. You could weigh yourself alone on various scales for years and conclude your body weight is say.. 220 pounds fairly consistently. But then get a doctor and a couple nurses to weigh you and the scale could read 265 and you will now have to summon your reality or summon your belief to be stronger than their faith in their practice or will to deceive in order for it to line up with your lived experience. So No to gravity. :)
aerotrooper 4 weeks ago
@aerotrooper What?
TheIncognitusMe 4 weeks ago
@aerotrooper Body weight is not consistent, for one.
Secondly, if they are 45lbs off, there is something wrong with one of the scales.
Has nothing to do with gravity, deception, or faith. Has everything to do with properly functioning equipment.
village1diot 4 weeks ago 44
@village1diot So does one persons belief and understanding having been conferred by multiple measuring devices trump 3 other persons and their 1 protocol of measurement? Does one hold authority over the other?
Also we can add incompetence or human error into the equation. If the question involves or resolves with "properly functioning equipment" then I'm curious about the aspect of a persons unquestioned or unflinching faith in their "equipment" or measuring device. Interesting to talk about.
aerotrooper 3 weeks ago
@aerotrooper whaaa?? weight is determined by gravity. gravity is constant. The only variable that can change your weight weight is your mass. Weight=(Gravity)x(Mass). If your weight increases by 45 lbs that means your mass increased by 4.6 lbs, gravity didn't do it because gravity stays constant at 9.8 meters/second^2.
Or, as village1diot pointed out, it was a faulty scale.
hardxxcorey 3 weeks ago
@hardxxcorey Couple things wrong with your comment.
First, weight/mass are not the only variables. You weigh less on the moon, or at the top of Everest than you do at sea level. Distance from a gravitational field also affects your weight.
Second, mass is not measured in lbs, lbs is weight. Mass is measured in grams.
Third, 9.8m/s^2 is not "gravity", nor is it constant. It is the acceleration caused by Earth's gravitational pull near sea level (and only near sea level) in a vacuum.
Fortune2point0 2 weeks ago
@Fortune2point0 lbs can be a mass. 1 lb=453.59 grams, it's a simple conversion. lbs are usually a measurement of weight, but that doesn't mean they're restricted to that. Just as grams are a common measurement of mass, but don't always measure mass (nor are grams the only measurement of mass). Grams can also be a weight--there are scales that measure WEIGHT in GRAMS.
And yes, you're right that gravity isn't always 9.8m/s^2, but for the sake of aerotrooper's omment it was.
hardxxcorey 2 weeks ago
@hardxxcorey No. 453.59 grams = 1lb on Earth at sea level, significantly less on say, the moon, and it would be a bit less on Everest. Mass is not weight, they are related though. Grams are not used for weight, grams are a measure of mass. Those scales measure mass, not weight. And what else is used to measure mass other than grams?
Fortune2point0 2 weeks ago
@aerotrooper Are you being serious?
attitudinous 2 weeks ago
@aerotrooper Dude, you can not be serious! I hope you are trolling for your own sake, If not pick up and read a book, ANY book in the NON-FICTION section.
nontrainspotter 2 weeks ago
It amazes me the length that people will go to not disturb there way of thinking. I think its a talent to be so logical and critical minded you can have an understanding that most cannot comprehend. I cannot paint a picture but i can most certainly think logically & critically. Its a curse sometimes BC people that cannot understand dont. Its not like a painting i can pull out and show how much better of a painter i am. more like if i had to explain how to paint without a canvas
stopbeingcowards 2 weeks ago in playlist deity
inversely proportional as the square of the distance
MrP86 4 weeks ago
Matt did a great job on this one.
zofoblues 4 weeks ago
idk why christians have such a hard time understanding. it wasent hard for me to see evidence and go "yep my faith is bs" it wasent that important, it never was, even as a christian i seen no help or understanding from "god" only stories. stories despite how good or heroic "some" were they was not enough to make me believe, bushs burn and talk, snakes talk, man came from dirt, woman came from a rib, and god snapped his fingers and we sprang from the ground. its all clearly bs.
compendiumgravemind 4 weeks ago
It's not, "In the beginning", it's "Once upon a time", thow shall not eat from the Tree of Knowledge. Christians excel in that.
rollofnickles 4 weeks ago
I you wanted to give God the same validity as gravity, first He'd have to be real, and second, He'd need to have a demonstrable effect on all things. The only thing the two have in common is invisibility.
ChipArgyle 4 weeks ago
@ChipArgyle Maybe he does have a demonstrable effect on all things, we are just not recognizing it. Remember it took Newton who is a genius to even recognize something as recognizable as gravity...
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford Everybody saw and felt the effects of gravity, we just hadn't quantified it until Newton came around. Is there some kind of God effect out there that everyone is experiencing that we just haven't named or quantified yet? It's a stretch.
ChipArgyle 4 weeks ago
@ChipArgyle There's a lot of effects out there that we are experiencing that we haven't named or quantified. A lot of our psychological problems stem from us experiencing something that we can't really put our finger on it. And its either because we don't know, or interestingly enough it's because we don't want to know.. That's why with respect to God and psychology there is a level of acceptance that has to happen..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford Right. So with this Physics, Business, and whatever degree all you do is sit on your ass and post YouTube comments all day? Go away loser.
AcruxSolus 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford That's a big eureka for you! You've found it. This God effect you're searching for must be the cause of all those psychological problems.
ChipArgyle 4 weeks ago
@Adam43848 the people at CERN are working on this just this moment
bzu1040171 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You actually can't quantify gravity... Listening to this atheist jabber on like he knows anything about physics is just amusing.. Here is a real physicist Michio Kaku talking about science and gravity and God. And he's not nearly as confident in science as much as you atheist are.. It won't let me post the link so search this on YouTube
"Science vs God : It's The Collapse Of Physics As We Know It"
PhilLankford 1 month ago
@PhilLankford You can quantify gravity. And we do.
TheIncognitusMe 1 month ago
@TheIncognitusMe We do, but that doesn't mean we are good at it..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PhilLankford "We do, but that doesn't mean we are good at it.." Why aren't we good at it? Even if we aren't great at it, do you have a better way of trying to understand things? Saying "if I let go of this, it will fall" is an example of quantifying gravity... how can you say we "can't" do that? What is the complaint there?
TheIncognitusMe 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford g=9.8 m/s2
like my quantification?
bzu1040171 4 weeks ago
@bzu1040171 More of an explanation. And that equation only works in one place in the universe, if you are falling through the sky in earths atmosphere. But that does not mean you know what gravity is or what causes it..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford hay true, we don't know what "causes" gravity or how does it occur, and I'm an agnostic to the matter
I'm sure of the effect of gravity that I don't see but can quantify and predict
frankly, it sure is amusing if their is some weird wave function that causes subatomic particles composed of vibrating energy string to cause the manifestation of the gravitational force that we see. but that I don't believe and don't blame anyone who doesn't believe.
and we can quantify it (gravity)
bzu1040171 3 weeks ago
@PhilLankford lol.
village1diot 4 weeks ago 11
@village1diot agreed - lol
Xellith 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford Gravity has units and has a value. How is not a quantity.
pythor2 4 weeks ago
@pythor2 We put those units and value to it. But sometimes those unit are not right. The math isn't even consistent in our own solar system. Mercurys orbit around the sun is different than all the other planets and our mathematics can't explain it. It wasn't tell relativity that we knew that it was the suns bending of space time that creates its orbit. But relativity isn't consistent in the universe either, the units break down in black holes..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford Okay. So we don't know a little about the universe. So what? We know the effects of gravity on a large scale, most if not all applies to us.
pythor2 4 weeks ago
@pythor2 That is true we do know the effects but we don't know what causes the effects. First it was a mechanical force, then it was relativity, now we don't really know. And figuring that out is the future. We have barely scraped the surface of how it applies to us. Yes we use gravity to to harness power from rivers, but imagine what the possibilities will be when we can know on a quantum scale and galactic scale what gravity really is. It will make the impossible possible..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford So, basically, it's a "Why does gravity work" instead of a "How does gravity work" question. This is a bigger theme that scientists don't tackle, and instead leave it to philosophers. Saying that we can't quantify a "why" is a ridiculously meager attempt at discrediting scientific fact.
pythor2 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford Reason constantly undermines and reconstructs knowledge. That is how it works. Michio Kaku has confidence in science. He also has humility. If there is not an answer there is not an answer. How does that necessitate god? Tell me where god comes in? By the way none of that suggests that gravity is not observable. It shows that at extremes what we know of gravity can totally change. The clip opens up with the explanation of just that. Still, where is observable evidence of god?
GenghisCohen1 4 weeks ago
@GenghisCohen1 Im glad you actually watched the video. I am not denying that gravity isn't observable, I'm simply saying that we do not have a logical explanation for what it is we are observing. We know how it relates to us, but not nearly to its full extent. Michio Kaku humility is where god comes into play, he knows that even with all the science in the world you are still only looking through the looking glass, at something greater than yourself.
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford "he knows that even with all the science in the world you are still only looking through the looking glass, at something greater than yourself." This idea means nothing in the quest to try to understand the universe. It doesn't add information. All you're saying is that "we could be wrong." No kidding? Science is trying to explain observable phenomenon, which is always going to be relative to our understanding of the universe at the time.
TheIncognitusMe 4 weeks ago
@TheIncognitusMe By looking glass I mean we can know everything there is to know but we will always be looking at it through the human condition. And we will never have a true un-biased third person perspective of what is really going on.
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford I'm sure modern medicine would benefit greatly from accepting the fact that their medicine might be flawed, even though it helps save people's lives daily. Maybe instead of using their knowledge to save lives, they'll just keep their medical breakthroughs to themselves until they become metaphysical super beings who know for a fact how the universe works.
TheIncognitusMe 4 weeks ago
@TheIncognitusMe My grandpa was a medical doctor, He would agree with you that he is only practicing medicine and that it is not perfect. But the funny thing is he you to say he could do a perfect jobs in surgery but he could only do so much, the rest is left up to God..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford "we will never have a true un-biased third person perspective of what is really going on." Understanding things beyond what we are capable of experiencing is obviously impossible, and it is not useful to have that information, since it has nothing to do with is. What's your point?
"he could do a perfect jobs in surgery but he could only do so much, the rest is left up to God..." The rest is left up to the patient's body, and the effectiveness of the treatment. But I digress.
TheIncognitusMe 4 weeks ago
@TheIncognitusMe I propose we amend U.S. state constitutions one by one via popular vote to ban creationists from the use of microwave ovens until they accept the knowledge of which they reap the benefit of.
aerotrooper 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
jordaniac89 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford lol.
jimmyjazz240 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford So, serious question here. What do you beleive gravity is and how do you think it works?
xTheuglytruthx 4 weeks ago
@xTheuglytruthx From an observable field gravity is best explained by relativity the bending of space time. But Einstein's relativity does not explain black holes and the math only works up to big bang. So we know what gravity is but we don't know its origins and we can't observe it origins which is maybe some unknown quantum energy that exist beyond our known universe..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford I have tried to answer you so many times with what i want to say. Every time i do though, my windows keeps fucking up and i have to delete everything i have written in reply, so, im going to try and reply with what i was going to say at a later date because right now! my PC is about to go into the trash!! why have i been able to write all of this?....I have no fucking idea!! it's giving me the shits though...goodnite and peace out!
xTheuglytruthx 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford Are you really that much of an idiot?
AcruxSolus 4 weeks ago
@AcruxSolus No more than you.
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford You obviously have a very limited Wikipedia-based knowledge of science. Watching two videos by Michio Kaku on YouTube doesn't make you an expert on anything relating to science, gravity, or humility.
AcruxSolus 4 weeks ago
@AcruxSolus My grandpa was a medical doctor, My father has his Phd in History and philosophy and runs his own Charity. And I have a degree in Physics, Philosophy and Business Finance. But your right about one thing. My knowledge of Wikipedia is limited. I tend to stick with books.
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford My distant cousin is Olivia Newton-John and her father was a famous physicist and my all time favorite movie is Xanadu.
aerotrooper 3 weeks ago
@PhilLankford Kaku believes in the type of "god" that Einstein or Spinoza did. Definitely different than a creator being.
shearoberts 4 weeks ago
@shearoberts Will you explain the difference for me?
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford I actually watched that video....all it says is that there are some things in Physics we don't fully understand. Not a single word about an Invisible Man In The Sky.
lewisner 4 weeks ago
@lewisner Accept in the title..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford So mentioning it is irrelevant since it has absolutely nothing to do with "god".
lewisner 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford 9.8 m/s2.
There, I quantified Earth's gravity.
Schwazoom 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford religion is retarded, simply retarded.
Jayhc19 4 weeks ago
@Jayhc19 You're right cause sleeping in and watching football is so much more productive than spending your Sundays with friends and family who are simply trying to become better people.
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford i dont sleep in on sundays, your first mistake is assuming atheists are slobs that waste away their time, personally i know this is the only life i get and i make the most of it. plus i live in ireland so football aint on until 1am on sundays here lol
Jayhc19 3 weeks ago
@PhilLankford Oh for fuck's sake.
Akira625 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford He is confident so what? He is right about everything he mentioned. Not being able to observe effects is another way of saying that their is nothing to observe
IronMan50780 4 weeks ago
@IronMan50780 Or we are limited in our tools to observe what is really there..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
fear not Christian , because Gravity believes in YOU !
Gravity, fall for it today !
SqueakerAlpha 1 month ago 2
Anyone who doesn't believe in gravity is invited to jump out a 15th floor window. That is all.
LordAztahoth 1 month ago
gravity is the effect of his noodly goodness, pressing down on believers.
SqueakerAlpha 1 month ago
You can see the effect's of God too Matt, their called Crazy Fucker's.
42lynchmob 1 month ago
Lol, " Gravity you can't see!" {Drops Pen}
dolerbom 1 month ago
This video made me stop believing in gravity. Tomorrow, I'm gonna float to school, and I don't care what anyone says about it. Haters gonna hate, right?
DahBjorn 1 month ago 2
@DahBjorn Higgs boson says no.
colouredmirrorball 1 month ago
@DahBjorn They can't prove you can't float right?
JamesHLanier 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
negro voice, click, the end just hang UP!
FUwogs 1 month ago
@FUwogs there's always one of you...
Scarlomane 1 month ago
@FUwogs Why? Why do you it? Fucking racist moron.
village1diot 4 weeks ago 19
when did matt have hair!?!
Charlii931603 1 month ago
@Charlii931603 A long time ago ^_^
carom1 1 month ago
@Charlii931603 During this video.
phazonxl 1 month ago
i hate gravity, always keeps me down :(
speedx50 1 month ago 2
But see, thats an atheists problem. You can back up gravity with evidence by dropping a pen. But when it comes to believing in a spiritual entity that science isn't capable of proving yet, then it's completely unbelievable. Lol, Yet, many of us believers have experience and experience with this deity and you will not believe it until science proves it to you. The only reasonable argument to you atheists is if science can explain it. If it doesn't , then we are all out of our minds.
Tom6093 1 month ago
@Tom6093 What if your "experiences" can be explained by science. What if these experience are caused by chemicals and electric pulses and visual hallucinations of your brain? The only way to prove that God exist is if God himself claims responsibility to your experiences. He needs to announce his presence and will to ALL humankind alike. Which is clearly not the case, given the dizzying amount of religions as well as christian denominations in the world.
thelaw986 1 month ago
@thelaw986 Remember though, Religions are just the way people inturprate and make up customs to worship who they feel God is. I personally believe There is only one true God that has many different names, excliuding the Greek Myth Gods. They are known Myth. God is different to people in in mainstream Christianity, Cathloc, and Jewish Denominations. Even Buddism, Hinduism have some of the same traights. God means something different for everyone one...
Tom6093 1 month ago
@thelaw986 The brain is very complex.. I know the mind can make you feel things. I know the chemicals and the emotions they give. But this is more.......alot more then chemicals. As crazy as it sounds...Until you open your mind and heart and soul,, you will never experience it...trust me....
Tom6093 1 month ago
@Tom6093 God of the Bible does not need people to "open his or her mind" to experience him. Take the example with Adam, Lot, Cain and Abel, people of Sodom and Gomorrah; these people had direct contact and CONVERSATIONS with God. Can you think of a recent example in the news where a person talks to God is commanded by God?
thelaw986 1 month ago
@thelaw986 It's all about prayer and faith these days. Critical atheists might look at it from the stand point that it all sounds crazy, But when your heart is closed and you live for the world, It isn't possible. You turn your back on God, don't expect a blessing or visit, we go to him first, then he finds us. Science won't find God. He won't be found by world standards.
Tom6093 1 month ago
@Tom6093 "My belief is God is all forgiving." You are inputting your own ideas into what God is here. In the bible, God's actions in the old testament shows he is not very forgiving.
thelaw986 1 month ago
@Tom6093 Also, in the Bible, people who do not obey God just DIE! He does not wait to punish people. He kills them immediately. There are tons of sinners now in the world who DEFY God is more ways than people of Sodom and Gomorrah, and do they get fire and brimstone. Nope. So tell me, has the so called "eternal" God CHANGED?
thelaw986 1 month ago
@thelaw986 You sure your not part of the West Baptist Church ? My belief is God is all forgiving. As long as we repent and do his will. He understands we aren't perfect. God doesn't send anyone to hell. We send ourselfs there. It's your choice whether you agree with what this world tells you whats logical and possible, deny your maker and send yourself to hell or open your heart and spirit , throw caution to the wind and experience true love ,Grace and compassion. Then enemy blind you
Tom6093 1 month ago
@thelaw986 I don't think God has changed, its just shows how fucked up Sodom and Gomorrah were five thousand years ago..
PhilLankford 4 weeks ago
@PhilLankford I disagree. Society now is way more fucked up than back in the old days. God is either 1. hiding from his creations 2. never existed to begin with. Option 2 is the correct answer.
thelaw986 4 weeks ago
Create a video response or Post
i am atheist but but but but but,,,,,,,,,, i think if a religion can give someone hope ,faith ,love thats good for the people to follow if they want to ,,,,,, just imagine can u or anyone in this world can give hope to someone who has suffered emotionally and mentally,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,what will give them hope that everything will be all right ???????? ........if it has to come from any religion i think everyone will not mind and we all will agree
skygurung13 1 month ago
lmfao when he dropped the pen
FTD0Productions 1 month ago
When she asked how can you believe in gravity and Matt dropped the pen. I laughed so hard french fries shot out my mouth! XD
Anthony13USA 1 month ago
Dumb woman. People like her are unable to change their minds because their mind is not their own.
Michael55443 1 month ago