There is NO requirement to label produce with the PLU 5-digit code starting with 8. Grocers have the option to do so, but don't. Until there are labeling laws in place, we will not know if the produce or processed foods we consume are genetically modified. Buying organic is the only safeguard, and sadly with the increasing number of genetically modified crops the likelihood that the organic crops are cross contaminated becomes more and more likely.
To Everyone who reads this comment:Go to FlourideAlert . org TAKE ACTION and read about the disturbing truth of this destructive toxin in your cities water supply, its even got into our food supply for christs sake, they are deliberately TRYING to toxicate us with this pollution and its a dumbfounded cycle of toxicity that no one seems to care about, but I DO!!!! Get your city to stop fluoridating its water NOW!!!! Write a newspaper article to your town or simply tell everyone you know of this!
auto immune disease is what causes cancer. 8 million people a yr die of cancer and in the US 1 in 4 cancer sufferers DIE. Cancer is a Candida fungal infection which can be prevented through salvestrols in fruit and vegetables to create a chemical substance that kills only cancer cells. Organic fruit and vegetables is the only way you can get you proper nutrition and fight of the fungus which is cancer. GMO STRIPS YOUR FOOD. think about that people.
being that toamotes, lettuce, broccoli, all wheats ("organic" or not) have all been manipulated via eugenic breeding pactices, and would never have survived or existed apart from human intervention, you organotards might as well stop eating...absolutely everything
Not natural? Horizontal gene transfer between species happens all the time. If you think your 'natural' food is free from transgenes, think again. And roughly 8% of the human genome came from viruses....you have transgenes too. Anti-GMO people should learn some basic biology before presuming to know more than all the scientists who support genetic engineering. And that PLU thing is a myth...besides, certain papayas and summer squash are currently the only non-agronomic GE crops.
@Zhavlon HGT is highly unlikely to occur between a deep sea organism and a plant that grows high in mountains. Yet this can be done with genetic engineering. That is not natural. Bt has occured in soil with various crops and there has been little to no HGT between them. Yet now have bt corn, canola, cotton etc. This is not natural.
I worked on a study that tested several dozen varieties of farmer's market produce, and several thousand food samples from packaged food at local stores. The result: 0 non-gmo. Yeah, that's right...not one of the several thousand samples did NOT contain GMOs. Conclusion: humans are fucked.
@thecajun124, we agree with your assertions about the bill S510. They will sell it to us like it's for our safety then use it to further control our lives. This bill is criminal at best. HSA to govern food. Like the American farmer has been trying to kill us. This worlds problems come from all the monopolies that are being promligated by congress. They ever rob the avg Joe to bail out their union infested monopolies. Check out our biospharms YT channel for more good videos. Subscribe
It's may be too late but find out who your Senators are are SCREAM NO on Senate Bill 510!! They will vote on it any day, Monsanto engineered it, calling it a "Food Safety Bill' it falls under the the jurisdiction of Homeland Security, AND IT ROBS US OF VIRITUALLY ALL NON-GMO FOOD CHOICES because it will make Organic farming and the saving of real seeds disapear. I'm not religious, but this bill is so evil it sounds like something out of the Old Testament. Pertains to meat as well= antibiotics
No real farmer would support Monsanto. Now a monsanto lobbyist would support the positions we see here. It's the Skunk theory!
Everyone w a brain knows that over regulation by idiots and that's the only type that would regulate. It Destroys and kills free spirits. Monopolies and big gov work together only for the betterment of themselves. Biospharming outside the US of regulations may be the best way to live.
@couldnotcareless, everyone knows you work for Monsanto. It's POS like you who lobby like you do to line the pockets of billion dollar monoploies. You make everyone sicker than monsantos roundup.
S510 could still get "blue slipped". It is thought to be illegally written and this could stop it. Pray america and it just might get stopped.
Couldnotcareles, please stay away you are a pervert. Peolpe like you should be ashamed. You are just gross.
It has been reported that S510 passed today 73 25. This is a crime against humanity. Please rent "Food Inc" it is the best information on how you are being poisened for profit Monsanto and other food Monopolies are behind this. This new gov agency will add billions to the national debt.
S510 is set up for Monsanto. The plan to stop all small farmers and organic gardeners. Loose wording in it will be used to allow them entry and destruction rights of your private property. Monsanto can be stopped if everyone you know files a small claim court action against them in every town and county. Beat them to death slowly. It's cheap and easy to do. File anything!
The Federal Govt. has totally turned it up a notch, we must make a valiant stand please join me and subscribe, together we can form an unstoppable force, issues like TSA, Monsanto, S510, HR 875, Fema camps, fluoride, chemtrails these things are unacceptable, so i hope you will join me in a pursuit for the truth send a sub and throw some friends my way . Anyone who feels they DESERVE TO BE TOLD THE TRUTH i am not a spammer i am just trying to unify the movement. God Bless, much Respect, MTBA
CouldNot CareLes- You obviously work for Monsanto! You have a comment on how Monsanto isn't harmful on numerous youtube videos that are against GMO's. Why are you collaborating with these monsters. They are literally hurting PEOPLE! Wake up Les....and care.
@Rogerio34567 In 2006, the U.S department of agriculture issued an official report stating that GMO crop yields are not greater than conventional crop yields. gm foods are mostly consumed by developed nations and will seldom be feeding poverty stricken countries.
@CouldNotCareLes "GE crops available for commercial use do not increase the yield potential of a variety. In fact, yield may even decrease.... Perhaps the biggest issue raised by these results is how to explain the rapid adoption of GE crops when farm financial impacts appear to be mixed or even negative"
@CouldNotCareLes I'm afraid it is a USDA report and you might have confirmed it for yourself with just 5 minutes of research (entering the quote into any search engine). I suppose closing your ears and eyes going "lalallala" is all you're capable of. Here's more:
"The report found that engineered herbicide tolerant soy and maize did not increase yield at the national, aggregate level" - 1999 study by Charles Benbrook
@CouldNotCareLes You're taking it of context. From the study itself: "Bt crops act as insurance against significant losses that **may occur** in the event of **severe pest infestations**"
So under severe (i.e NOT common) infestations GM crop comes through, and the rest of the time is an uneconomical choice due to the price premium of GM seed. Nice try in being selective. Looking forward to your next BS comment
@CouldNotCareLes So now you're pretending to be a farmer and resorting to anecdotal evidence?
"Since the decision to plant Bt crops must be made prior to observing the insect infestation, the farmer may or may not make the most economical decision for a given year depending upon the resulting infestation" - USDA May 2002
So u bet on a massive infestation every season and just buy GM seed the whole year round whilst it unnecessarily eats into your profit margins? You're smart
@BOZ11 - prior to RR soy, we used to bet on a weed infestation each year and incorporate Treflan into the soil before we planted, and then spray Poast over the top immediatly after planting.
That practice was started by the farmers of Grampa's time ... was that a dumb move too?
@CouldNotCareLes Les, my deficient friend. My argument against the economic viability of GM seed cannot be likened to, nor has any relevance to conventional farming practices, like the use of herbicide. I think you know it, but then I fear I'd be giving you far too much credit. You're done. I shan't responding to any more inanity from you
@CouldNotCareLes what ever you say old man LOL all I know is that you got exposed and OWNEDDDDDD LOL. You couldnt even rebuttal lol. Come on less, you shouldnt of let yourself get tossed and manhandled in that way.
@CouldNotCareLes Exactly, you cant rebuttal. Poison? As if I eat it, I die right away or in a month or two? Dont take it what Mr.Boz said out of context. He was referring to the long lasting effects of consuming gmos. He really did expose you, you know that.
@CouldNotCareLes Most americans have been eating GMOs for over ten years. You know why? Because they FUCKING DONT KNOW, thats why. Imagine if they knew?
@CouldNotCareLes What you are saying is false. A study published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences revealed the parameters of 60 different biochemicals in rats. Rats fed genetically modified corn were compared to their parents who had been fed non-GM corn. The results clearly showed a difference between the two groups. Rats fed GM food had signs of liver and kidney problems. Effects were also found on the heart, adrenal glands, and spleen.
@CouldNotCareLes According to PhysOrg.com, a Russian study found that 55.6 percent of the newborns of female rats fed genetically engineered soy flour before, during, and after pregnancy, died within three weeks. Only 9 percent of the offspring of rats fed non-GM soy died. In addition, 36 percent of the rats in the GM-fed group were underweight, compared with only 6.7 percent of the control group. In humans, the effects of gmos would be more subtle and would not be detected in years.
@CouldNotCareLes You know what, what a great suggestion, everybody growing their own food. People will not be depended on a system which is corrupted by corporations which will put their health at risk. It will be hard and radical change but a change for the better. A change for self awareness and self consciousness.
@CouldNotCareLes What if the majority of the people living in the us informed themselves about gmos? I bet there would be an outcry to stop using Gmos. Then whos wallets would shrink? The farmers incase of an infestation. If this is the way it has to be, then fuck it. Better than putting the population at risk for diseases
@CouldNotCareLes ur a terrorist! go away, stop poisoning the kids, you sell out! poor indians, they gave you guys the corn crops and u ruin it, no respect. fucking pure evil, the founding fathers would shit on you, already u violate the constitution, it sayes that its illegal to patent food sources and here u are buying GM bt crop from corruption, i hope u dont wave a american flag cause you are a fake! so sad, u dont even care for the future. i work on an organic farm, i care for this country!
I think they"re burning the crap in India because A they can't afford to buy the seeds every year-regular crops give seeds for next year B yields were not bigger in years 3&4 C frankencrops need WAY too much water and D Monsanto has a rude, threatening, nasty manner . They know its unhealthy too, because their animals that got in the field died from eating it. Seems reason enough.
I just love Shelly Roche! She delivers such horrible and deadly news all while keeping the most beautiful smile on her face. Very pleasant to look at and quite easy on the eyes.
@CouldNotCareLes Water (i.e., H₂O = O₂ ⇆ H₂) is a quantum universal elemental solvent exteriorly consisting of Protons (i.e., p⁺) Neutrons (i.e., n⁰) & Electrons (i.e., e⁻) &, or is the base(s) for all alcoholic &, or nonalcoholic beverages & is the base(s) for all living organic O₂ breathing E = m (i.e., energy matter) organisms & CAN NOT ever be any GMO's, since it DO NOT have any DNA &, or RNA code(s). Thus as a Black God Man, etc I impartially & say you're 100% incorrect in insinuating it.
@CouldNotCareLes The human body consists of the following sixty (i.e., 60) E = m chemical elements & some of them are toxic, poisonous, radioactive &, or explosive:
After conducting studies on rodents that were fed Monsanto GM corn, The Committee of Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering stated that:
"The data "clearly underlines adverse impacts on kidneys and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, as well as different levels of damages to heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system," reported Gilles-Eric Séralini, a molecular biologist at the University of Caen."
If GM corn is killing rats, what is it doing to us?
As a Back God Man, etc I say that The Gods & the elect knows100% why GMO's, etc was created by Satan via his naturally born-wicked Edomite people for genocide, or reducing Earth's population, thus explains why Illuminati society (i.e., ∆) members (Evelyn Rothschild, Bill Gates, etc) supports it. Cesare Borgia, the fake Jews, etc courtesy of Satan's Edomites.
As a geneticist, etc I say, the girl reading the script &, or anyone else thinking they can avoid GMO's is 100% incorrect & DO NOT understand the definition of "organisms" (any biological life forms such as; humans, animals, plants, insects, fungus & bacterium). All livestock are genetically modified from conception & fed GM feed, starch food (pastas, fruits, seeds, beans, rices, breads, corn, potatoes, cereals, etc) is also GM foods. FYI: In the USA & Canada GM foods are purposely not labeled.
There is a reason that Nature does not allow plants and animals to breed across the species DNA barrier. Through violent GE processes, Monsanto forces trans-species (and even trans-kingdom) plant varieties. This is dangerous. There is no way that any science can prove that genetic engineering is safe – the technologies do not exist to know or measure all the health-safety effects. Speak up..! Do not allow Monsanto to pollute the world’s seed supply..! We cannot recall bad DNA.
OH NO! THIS IS DANGEROUS! THE PLANTS HAVE ONE FIREFLY TRAIT AND THUS ARE HUNGRY FOR HUMAN FLESH! EVERYBODY RUN! NATURE DIDN'T INTEND FOR ORGANISMS TO GET A TRAIT THAT ANOTHER ORGANISM NATURALLY EVOLVED TO HAVE!
OH GOD! EUGENICS! JUST LIKE IN THE HOLOCAUST! (*Disregarding that humans have done eugenics on animals for hundreds of thousands of years (thus the dog and housecat and race horse and dairy cow were invented)*)
there are series consequences of GMO foods that contain high levels of pesticides..
these mimic estrogen in the body (xenoestrogens) and create estrogen pool overload which eventually makes women have cystic breasts, ovaries, and a very painful disease called endometriosis , these symptoms will mostly likely cause infertility long term if not cause breast or uterus cancers..
thanks again goes to our 'public servants' for poisoning us and shortening our lives.. GMO is basically Eugenics.. !
@sugoo2 "basically" it IS eugenics! Don't forget the 46% GM Corn syrup solids in infant formula with an additional 6.5% sugar and of course it's GM soy based and then all those GM Corn derived "nutrients" There is a reason that these things are approved by WIC and the government. There is a reason why they discourage breast feeding for the poor. They want them dead because they think they are a drain on society! These poisons retard their brains and make them that way
@Leonicdragon yes and of course all the rest of the poisons in everyday life.. only education will help u there.. the NWO are targetting mainly black and indigenious communities as a priority (see haiti).. but they do have an agenda for all of us though,,they want us monitored, sick and dependant on addictions, pharma etc
These nazis favour the blonde, blue eyed A blood types, they are far easier to programme and control.. not many of them left out there though..they sacrificed them all !
Stereotypes I would say, not that I'm offended as a B type misanthropist! It's like astrology in a sense, it's fun to read but don't take it too seriously.
@sugoo2 do your part, spread organic heirloom food seed far and wide, its called "johnny appleseed economics" or "gorrila gardens", spread more organic food than GMO and you will water down the effects and if everyone becomes self suffcient at their homes it will stop GMO right in its tracks, if there is enough people it will save our food system, thats how you win! wake up everyone, do your part if u are angry, get seed and make a organic revolution your way.
Monsanto contaminated the air, lakes, rivers and soil of Anniston Alabama with toxic PCB’s. This act also, of course, poisoned the people of Anniston. So now you have to ask yourself: Did Monsanto know that the PCB’s they were flooding Anniston with were toxic? Let’s give Monsanto the benefit of the doubt and say ‘No, they didn’t know’. Then you have to ask yourself: What does Monsanto not know about the toxic effects of the GMO’s they are selling?
@BradLauber : Your illogic is incomrehensible. Sorry, you’re not worth the time. Eat GMO's, feed 'em to your kids. Write Monsanto love letters or whatever else status quo Monsanto groupies do.
---
For those of you with a grasp of the history of science and it's tragic (and many times "fatal") mistakes: say NO to Monsanto. Say NO to genetically engineered food. Watch "The World According to Monsanto" or "The Future of Food". Get the Truth. Make up your own mind. Think critically.
@BradLauber : You're being evasive. If I were defending a company as dark and dastardly, as disrespectul of living things as Monsanto, I would be evasive, too.
---
So science didn't work 10 years ago but it works now?! Interesting perspective. Is that what your Zen is all about? Respond to the Pusztai study - peer reviewed by 3 times the normal number of scientists - a study that clearly demonstrates the TOXIC nature of genetically engineered food.
@357935x I already responded to your study. It was a good study 10 years ago. And if you believe that a mousse digestive tract is similar to humans... basically if you think people are rats... and if you like to use decade old research in a cutting edge technology industry... then yes your study is relevant. I am abundantly familiar with this study and even read it when it came out, A DECADE AGO! It has been discredited by many later studies like this one... cont...
@357935x Please respond to this study... it is from 2007 and is now almost considered obsolete b/c of the new finding in the last 3 years... but the basic principal is still widely accepted among the scientific community.
w w w . ac sh . org / facts fears / news ID . 962 / news _ detail . asp
Why do u have to make me your enemy to have this conversation? Why do you continue to insist that i am "defending Monsanto"? I am simply trying to educate one that fears the unknown
@BradLauber - Read your own posts - you don't respond to the evidence that people have offered you. Instead you claim that people offered you no evidence. You call people "haters". That supposed to be scientific? "Haters" is entirely your own projection.
---
It's hard to defend the safety of genetically morphed seeds created by a toxic chemical company with a history like Monsanto's. There is absolutely no good reason to trust Monsanto. Maybe that's what you are bent out of shape about?
@stupid#'sguyx ... The only evidence that I have seen to date is: the NY time’s article from 2007 and a study from 1999 that talks about the unknowns of biotech and the unknown effects. In 1999 that was a relevant and good study... but over 10 years later in 2010 that study is obsolete. Many of the "unknown risks" discussed in the 99' study are now known... and know to be safe for human consumption. For the last time this is not about Monsanto... it’s about Molecular engineering.
@357935xI will respond to a recent study that shows evidence of your claims. Not a columnist’s opinion article or decade old research. I am still waiting for objective 3rd party evidence to prove your claims that GM is harmful to human kind. Cite it and stop trying to BS your way out of citing the evidence. You are not good at BS; I will wipe the floor with you if all you got is BS and opinions. CITE EVIDENCE or admit u have none...
@BradLauber I can't speak for 357935xI but, personally I'm not running around claiming that GMO's are bad... I'm saying that they could potentially be linked to the drastic increase of health problems that have popped up in the last half a century.
@smilesgirl17 The increased # or REPORTED illnesses in the last 50 yrs could also have something to do with the fact the world pop has gone from 3.5 billion to over 6 billion. Don’t you think doubling the world population would lead to an increased # of reported illnesses? When was the first effective MRI machine created? I think it was 1957 and they were not widely used until the late 60's. We only discovered about 2/3 of the types of cancer etc. in the last 50 yrs... Cont...
@smilesgirl17 Now realizing that we could not even diagnose most types of cancer until the 60's and given that our ability to find and diagnose illnesses and to understand their effect has expanded, we are getting healthier overall it is just that we are apparently getting worse at simple arithmetic. OF COURSE a growing world population and increased ability to find and diagnose illnesses, we did not even know about 50 yrs ago, is going to increase the # of REPORTED illnesses...cont...
@smilesgirl17 Take a look at simple lifespan data... it hardly points to a sinister "conspiracy" of big ag or bio-tech to kill off all the customers. The simple fact remains that we are getting healthier overall and that life spans are increasing and have accelerated that increase with modern practices... clean water, good hygiene, better medical practices and HEALTHIER FOOD. As soon as Modern crop sciences became a part of the food chain... all of the sudden the lifespan chart goes way up ???
To all the haters... I am not here to defend or try to justify anything. I started this with a simple question; what are you basing you theories that GM aka "modern crop sciences" are harmful or a net loss for humanity? That was my original question and that is all I wondered. As expected you all blew this way out of proportion claiming; that I’m at the center of some conspiracy to defend Monsanto or big agri biz. I don’t get the impression anyone is trying to find truth here, just destruction
Bill and Linda Gates are Mr & Mrs Typhoid Mary,Gates foundation is spreading cancer,aids,numerous long term sickness as part of NWO Eugenics program cause their view is"world is over populated" but Gate's do not take any vaccines themselves-these criminals need to be arrested.GMO foods are poison,Began by Bush Senior&Monsanto&Gates Foundation want to kill off the masses. Eugenics are standard policies of western Governs since 1960's if you don't believe-hurry up and die from your H1n1 poisons.
@exposetruthwolf I don't take the flu vaccine because it now contains 3 times the mercury levels it had in the 1970's and we had problems with it back then. If people that make the flu vaccine don't want to take it, why should I? Did Donald Rumsfeld (former CEO of Searles Pharma that is owned by Monsanto) ever take the vaccine? Probably not. Do I trust Donald Rumsfeld after his opinions of WMD's in Iraq? Nope, he just got richer at everybody else's expense and sleeps like a baby at night.
@MegaTmarshall Why do you think mercury is put into vaccinations, it's not just about money, what will such high level of mercury do to a 1 yr olds brain? nelson rockafeller set up the Am public Education saying:I want a nation of workers not thinkers." Why have the rocka fellers family only married their distant cousins for 3 generations?
Bill and Linda Gates are Mr & Mrs Typhoid Mary,Gates foundation is spreading cancer,aids,numerous long term sickness as part of NWO Eugenics program cause their view is"world is over populated" but Gate's donot take any vaccines themselves-these criminals need to be arrested.GMO foods are poison, Monsanto & Gates Foundation collaborate to kill off the masses. Eugenics programs are standard policies of western Governs since 1960's if you don't believe-hurry up and die from your H1n1 poisons.
@BradLauber : The 1999 peer reviewed Pusztai experiment that demonstrated the TOXIC nature of GMO's was peer reviewed by 6 reviewers - three times the usual number. Five gave it the green light to be published in The Lancet.
---
You ask for a peer reviewed study proving the TOXIC nature of GMO's. When I provide one, you make lame excuses.
---
People who visit this site should know that you not really into science. You are into white washing Monsanto. You’re a Monsanto Groupie.
@BradLauber :You stated below that Monsanto was sorry for poisoning the people of Anniston, AL with toxic PCB's.
---
Monsanto also poisoned the town of Nitro, WV with dioxins. When the Nitro folks confronted Monsanto with this, Monsanto stated that the allegations of the citizens of Nitro were "without merit" and Monsanto promises to vigorously defend itself.
---
Monsanto is sorry for Anniston but not for Nitro??
---
As a Monsanto groupie, Brad, can you please explain this??
@BradLauber - Brad, I would reword the Monsanto line on your website to read:
---
The Monsanto Co. - Applied Molecular Genetics could be the dark engine of annihilation of human genetics, health & wellbeing, the de-realization of human potential, disabling the human imagination to figure out how to clean up after all of Monsanto's toxic waste dumps and DNA contamination worldwide. Check this company out!
---
You have inspired me! Thank you. (I won't tell Monsanto).
@357935x I think I get it now... you only trust the science that confirms your predetermined notion of what you want to be true. That is not very objective. That is again, like the 100th example of how you only look for what you want to see. You only look for what you want to be true. Try this sometime; just look for the evidence and let it lead you to a conclusion rather that the other way around... that is sort of how scientific method it is supposed to work, just a thought.
@BradLauber That is the stupidist thing I hvae heard. Look around and see what pops up then try to apply it to some unknown objective to which you may then come up witha hypothesis. What kind of scientific study is that? What scientist uses that method?
Not the science i have used in any research project.
They sure interupte the natural cycle in a ecosystem , but that's the last thing we should be worring about when we are about to have a nuclear war in any day or second.
By the time we see the problems that "GMO'S" will cause to the planet are species will be already extcint.
u are completly headless!
p.d. I'm am 14years old and live in a 3rd world country , i'm sure u don't know what that means:D soo any way ... u are a stupid!
By the way, the people who died from L-Tryptophan died because it was genetically modified, not natuural tryptophan. There is research on this if you cared to see any opposition to your story. That was when they took L-Tryptophan off the market.
@moles2000 Death is really good evidence actually. However you must establish the reason for the death. If you can cite me definitive proof that withstands the scrutiny of scientific method that proves that these deaths were caused by gm I’d absolutely like to see it. It would represent a scientific breakthrough to find this evidence. As you would be the only one that had. You all don’t seem to get that your opinions are not evidence. They are humorous opinions just not evidence
@BradLauber What you are asking is for us to hand over research because you are too lazy to look it up yourself. I gave you a book to read that was full of citations of real research. Do you need a book on tape???
@BradLauber - By the way, Pusztai got fired for publicizing the results of his study demonstrating the harmful effects of a genetically engineered crop. That's the environment that scientists who buck the rich and unscrupulous biotech industry (and the biotech controlled FDA and USDA) are working in.
---
Pro-GMO propaganda is about money - nothing else.
---
Say NO to GMO's, NO to Monsanto - 10 years from now you'll be very glad you did.
@357935x You can't have it both ways... in one comment you deny the legitimacy of peer review and scientific study and say that we can’t trust any studies or science itself to lead us to conclusions b/c they are "paid for by corps". Then, in the same comment, you cite a peer reviewed scientific study trying to back up your claims. Who do you think paid for the Pusztai study? So which is it... we can or we can’t trust science. You don’t get to have your cake and eat it too. Cliché but true
@BradLauber - Bottom line on biotech science: If your company donates enough money to my university, I'll give you "peer reviewed science" that concludes anything you want.
---
I gave you a peer reviewed study demonstrating the harmful effects of GMO's. You chose to ignore it and to defend yourself with personal attacks. Not cool.
---
Pusztai: 1999 Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet. 354:1353-4.
@357935x So, you deny the legitimacy of science... we all get it. We have heard it 1000 times from you. What peer reviewed study did you cite me as evidence? I have never seen any evidence from you other than an article from the NY times written by a journalist that was telling us her opinion on GM. That is not actual evidence that is the media discussing unproven evidence and its potential effect on the industry. Its 2010 we have learned much since Pusztai and the 1999 study
@BradLauber - What you call "facts" are nothing but propaganda - follow the money trail. Instead of avoiding this question (again), please answer. It's a simple true/false question: Did Monsanto know that they were poisoning Anniston, AL with PCBs?
---
If YES: Then they should be banned from doing business (let alone genetically morphing the world's seed supply);
---
If NO: Then their scientists aren't very smart and they should be banned from genetically morphing the world's seed supply;
@357935x Chemical Dioxin plants are a dangerous thing to own and operate. I agree that Mon was in the total wrong when they poisoned those innocent people. Monsanto at that point dumped all "chemical" plants b/c of the liability. Today for liability purposes they do not own or operate a single dioxin plant in the country. Conversely their #1 competition DuPont is one of the only Dioxin plant owners in the world. Why not any concern for the STILL operating DuPont Dioxin plant in Miss???
@357935x Chemical production is a liability heavy industry and smart co's are getting out or outsourcing it to china or India. Any company that operates and dumps dioxins into the water supply should be harshly penalized. Again... why only concentrating on Monsanto? They don't even operate a dioxin facility anywhere anymore. ..Cont
@357935x If you were truly concerned for the innocent I would think you would be crusading to shut down the operational DuPont facility in Miss that still dumps 300 + parts per million of dioxins into the local swamplands and not spend your time looking back at an incident almost 2 decades old. I’m not suggesting that Mon is any better but at least they recognized they were wrong and stopped the wicked practice of Dioxin dump age.
@357935x By the way... my facts are peer reviewed, from scientific journals and withstand the scrutiny of scientific method. Which is more than we can say about your "Google it" research techniques. Who has referenced "food Inc" or the "world according to Mon" or "11 reasons to distrust Monsanto" as evidence? You have. I have only cited articles and papers from actual accredited scientific journals. Seriously you r 1 of the most intellectually lazy people I have ever spoken too about this
@357935x It’s become quite clear that u r not interested in "fact finding" you are interested in making Monsanto look "evil". You are trying to call Mon out on a practice they no longer participate in but DuPont does. Yet you don’t even mention DuPont. Hmm. Appears that you have a bit of a chip on your shoulder. Seriously... why not even mention DuPont they still dump dioxins into ground water. But no, nothing. I get the idea you’re not interested in helping people only destroying Monsanto
@BradLauber Brad would you care to comment on this "The Washington Post identified ACSH as "an industry-friendly group whose board member Betsy McCaughey helped set off the "death panels" frenzy" in the 2009 health care reform debate.
@edgeman148 Oh my, we couldn’t have "groups" that are friendly to "industries". What will happen then? Groups everywhere just being friendly to industries! Who do these "groups" think they are? Don’t they know that edgeman demands that all groups be unfriendly to industries! What is your point about ACSH? And what is your problem with old Betsy? And if you have not figured it out our gov't just took over health care and has passed a bill that authorizes "end of life panels" more PC for you
@BradLauber Thank you for your response, there is little evidence that the evolution of the agribusiness paradigm has benefited humanity but then again, perhaps it was not ever meant to do so. I am not demanding anything, I do not need to do so. My point was merely to amplify the fact that there are many organizations and institutions with specious names and different agendas which seem removed from their names. Honesty is the best policy.
@Bradlauber - Yup ... we are miles apart. But if you believe that "the epidemic levels of diabetes, Alzheimer’s, autism, impotence, infertility, dramatically reduced testosterone levels, cancers, allergies, & obesity that we have witnessed in the USA over the last decade" are just BS, then run that "really scientific feeling of yours" by Monsanto. They'll probably love it!
---
For the rest of us - best to stay clear of GMO's. I don't even feed them to my dogs. Don't have the heart.
@357935x Again, show me the definitive proof that any of these so-called "epidemics" are caused by GM. BTW an epidemic is when an infectious disease is spreading quickly. Do u honestly believe that all of these conditions are new and have never been a problem in the past? Considering the world population has doubled in 100 yrs. and that there are no detailed or reliable records of medical conditions or treatments from hundreds of years ago ... cont.
@357935x Perhaps if you did not go looking for what you want the evidence to say and actually understood what the evidence actually indicates maybe you would realize that an increased # of reported cases of any or all of the conditions you mentioned are a matter of simple arithmetic. More people = more cases and better record keeping and a better understanding of diseases has lead to more diagnosis also increasing the #. We are getting healthier overall. u apparently just suck at simple math
@357935x Seriously, have you not considered that an increasing population will lead to an increased # reported cases of illness? Have you seriously not considered that we did not really know what cancer even was until the invention of the MRI about 50 yrs ago? Do you not understand that we could not diagnose or report but a fraction of medical conditions hundreds of years ago? Do you not realize that life spans are increasing not decreasing? Oh yea... I forgot you can’t do simple arithmetic.
@357935x Just admit that your hatred of technology is baseless. Thats ok... not everyone is a scientist or a mathmatecian (obviously) If you "just dont like GM" thats fine, in fact thats great. The world needs somone to eat the toxoc fungi rich organic and whole foods. When insects bore into plant tissue they leave behind pathogenic fungi; a known cause of cancer and spinabifida etc. But hey, don't trust the evidence, just trust your "heart" or you "intuition". MMM cancer pathogens r delicious!
@Bradlauber And here's how much Monsanto cares about the safety of it's genetically morphed seeds:
---
Monsanto's director of corporate communications explained the company's regulatory philosophy to Michael Pollan in 1998: "Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA's job."
---
Monsanto's unfair influence over the FDA is legendary - so I guess we can't count on the FDA either.
@357935x I did not ask for more bs. You aint that good at bs. I asked for any kind or reasoning beyond "I just hate" for your theories about GM. All you continue to come back with is "science sucks" and "I don’t have any proof" or " google it" . If you just distrust GM that is good for you. We should each walk our own road. My only point to all of you is; there is no "proof" either way. Please stop claiming to know-for-certain something that is an unknown quantity at this point and time.
@BradLauber - I think that what turns people off most about your argument is simply this: "absence of proof is not proof of absence".
---
You prove it..! Prove that the epidemic levels of diabetes, Alzheimer’s, autism, impotence, infertility, dramatically reduced testosterone levels, cancers, allergies, & obesity that we have witnessed in the USA over the last decade are NOT due to genetically engineered seeds which were first marketed (not in 1986 as you stated), but in 1996. Prove it!
Comment removed
th86stone 1 week ago
Marry me.
amnlane 4 months ago
thanks for the info
istofal 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
**Must Watch**
"Genetic Armageddon: Humanity's Greatest Threat"
Copy and paste this to other videos!
bubbanator1212 6 months ago
She actually tripped over a correct take on an issue.
samiemma 6 months ago
if this girl was fat and ugly...wouldnt have half the views...just saying
joshfif 8 months ago
@joshfif very much the opposite ~ if she was starving to death and hollow-skull prob get 10,000 views a day
pzmtuthcvpvl 7 months ago
Great Video Thanks
GOD BLESS
ALPHAandOMEGA44 8 months ago
great tits.
estanuk 9 months ago
I have noticed of recent what I think to be Dole-Branded G.M.O. in 1/2 gallon fruit drink
pzmtuthcvpvl 10 months ago
There is NO requirement to label produce with the PLU 5-digit code starting with 8. Grocers have the option to do so, but don't. Until there are labeling laws in place, we will not know if the produce or processed foods we consume are genetically modified. Buying organic is the only safeguard, and sadly with the increasing number of genetically modified crops the likelihood that the organic crops are cross contaminated becomes more and more likely.
mchiarel11 10 months ago
@mchiarel11 that is one major-seriously good idea
pzmtuthcvpvl 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To Everyone who reads this comment:Go to FlourideAlert . org TAKE ACTION and read about the disturbing truth of this destructive toxin in your cities water supply, its even got into our food supply for christs sake, they are deliberately TRYING to toxicate us with this pollution and its a dumbfounded cycle of toxicity that no one seems to care about, but I DO!!!! Get your city to stop fluoridating its water NOW!!!! Write a newspaper article to your town or simply tell everyone you know of this!
MysTeri0usMatT7 10 months ago
good info thanks a bunch
FMChristain 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
auto immune disease is what causes cancer. 8 million people a yr die of cancer and in the US 1 in 4 cancer sufferers DIE. Cancer is a Candida fungal infection which can be prevented through salvestrols in fruit and vegetables to create a chemical substance that kills only cancer cells. Organic fruit and vegetables is the only way you can get you proper nutrition and fight of the fungus which is cancer. GMO STRIPS YOUR FOOD. think about that people.
medusazee 11 months ago
cool! i didn't know about the fruit #'s thanks so much
EcoBold 11 months ago
The only way to stop Monsanto evil is to stop buying their GMO products.
lanilani06 11 months ago
@lanilani06 - What GMO products do you purchase from Monsanto?
Unless you are a farmer, your boycott won't make any difference at all.
I've seen this statement for ten years.
The effect on Monsanto's market share = nothing.
You are barking up the wrong tree.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 11 months ago
being that toamotes, lettuce, broccoli, all wheats ("organic" or not) have all been manipulated via eugenic breeding pactices, and would never have survived or existed apart from human intervention, you organotards might as well stop eating...absolutely everything
Ty311 11 months ago
Are whole oats gmo?
xxdiogenescynicxx 11 months ago
@xxdiogenescynicxx - No.
There are no GMO oats.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 11 months ago
Not natural? Horizontal gene transfer between species happens all the time. If you think your 'natural' food is free from transgenes, think again. And roughly 8% of the human genome came from viruses....you have transgenes too. Anti-GMO people should learn some basic biology before presuming to know more than all the scientists who support genetic engineering. And that PLU thing is a myth...besides, certain papayas and summer squash are currently the only non-agronomic GE crops.
Zhavlon 11 months ago
@Zhavlon HGT is highly unlikely to occur between a deep sea organism and a plant that grows high in mountains. Yet this can be done with genetic engineering. That is not natural. Bt has occured in soil with various crops and there has been little to no HGT between them. Yet now have bt corn, canola, cotton etc. This is not natural.
myndy86 9 months ago
Smart and Sexy... ;) Nice! :D
Aleksej79ns 1 year ago
I worked on a study that tested several dozen varieties of farmer's market produce, and several thousand food samples from packaged food at local stores. The result: 0 non-gmo. Yeah, that's right...not one of the several thousand samples did NOT contain GMOs. Conclusion: humans are fucked.
canisdormit 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes -
What if you're poisoning 300 people?
duaneintoyo 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this!
icimblind 1 year ago
giRL ~ I Love Your Videos!! Thank You so much!!
PleaseSeeThis 1 year ago
what about drinking organic soy milk...I need the estrogen from it...
MsLiberty101 1 year ago
dear shelly, you are amazing, please go to the mall and find girls to mentor and make as smart and classy as u are
ItOffishul 1 year ago
GIRL I WANA GET YOU PREEEEGNAAAANT
FutureLaugh 1 year ago
by the way....you´re so sexy!
...natural beauty :-D
sinan187 1 year ago
@thecajun124, we agree with your assertions about the bill S510. They will sell it to us like it's for our safety then use it to further control our lives. This bill is criminal at best. HSA to govern food. Like the American farmer has been trying to kill us. This worlds problems come from all the monopolies that are being promligated by congress. They ever rob the avg Joe to bail out their union infested monopolies. Check out our biospharms YT channel for more good videos. Subscribe
biospharms 1 year ago
@biospharms -
Actually, this whole scheme was thought up by Norman Borlaug.
watch?v=tIvNopv9Pa8
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's may be too late but find out who your Senators are are SCREAM NO on Senate Bill 510!! They will vote on it any day, Monsanto engineered it, calling it a "Food Safety Bill' it falls under the the jurisdiction of Homeland Security, AND IT ROBS US OF VIRITUALLY ALL NON-GMO FOOD CHOICES because it will make Organic farming and the saving of real seeds disapear. I'm not religious, but this bill is so evil it sounds like something out of the Old Testament. Pertains to meat as well= antibiotics
TheCajun124 1 year ago
No real farmer would support Monsanto. Now a monsanto lobbyist would support the positions we see here. It's the Skunk theory!
Everyone w a brain knows that over regulation by idiots and that's the only type that would regulate. It Destroys and kills free spirits. Monopolies and big gov work together only for the betterment of themselves. Biospharming outside the US of regulations may be the best way to live.
biospharms 1 year ago
@biospharms - Here's news for you
Monsanto sells it's seed through a network of farmer/dealers.
There are over 300,000 very loyal farmers growing DeKalb corn.
(I am not one of them,)
I just saw last night at the high school choir concert, one of my Dad's old friends who's son runs a 400 acre certified organic grain farm.
This 80 year old guy has spent every summer of his life tending crops, the last 20 years totally organically.
He had a DeKalb jacket on.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@couldnotcareless, everyone knows you work for Monsanto. It's POS like you who lobby like you do to line the pockets of billion dollar monoploies. You make everyone sicker than monsantos roundup.
S510 could still get "blue slipped". It is thought to be illegally written and this could stop it. Pray america and it just might get stopped.
biospharms 1 year ago
@biospharms - I am a farmer.
Everybody would like to think I work for Monsanto because I'm giving them something to think about.
It's another internet myth.
The Grocery Manufacturers Association, along with help from YouTube fanatics, have pushed this legislation to where it is.
That is fact, and it won't get stopped until folks realize who is doing it.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes Les is less, stfu and fly away you disinfo goof.
blite13 1 year ago
@blite13 - what disinfo?
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
Couldnotcareles, please stay away you are a pervert. Peolpe like you should be ashamed. You are just gross.
It has been reported that S510 passed today 73 25. This is a crime against humanity. Please rent "Food Inc" it is the best information on how you are being poisened for profit Monsanto and other food Monopolies are behind this. This new gov agency will add billions to the national debt.
biospharms 1 year ago
@biospharms - You are the reason it passed.
Your smear campaign has diverted attention from those culpable.
Thanks alot ... just because you have something to gain doesn't mean it is good for everyone.
I'm trying to expose the forces behind this type of legislation.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
I wonder about GMO\s in Canada
msproductrater 1 year ago
Shelly, these are really helpful tips! I didn't know that about the product codes, how did you find out about that? Thanks
wcpastures 1 year ago
S510 is set up for Monsanto. The plan to stop all small farmers and organic gardeners. Loose wording in it will be used to allow them entry and destruction rights of your private property. Monsanto can be stopped if everyone you know files a small claim court action against them in every town and county. Beat them to death slowly. It's cheap and easy to do. File anything!
FYI Les is a monsanto asshole. Ignore him!
biospharms 1 year ago
@biospharms -
File a claim on what?
FYI biospharms is trying to sell you something.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
The Federal Govt. has totally turned it up a notch, we must make a valiant stand please join me and subscribe, together we can form an unstoppable force, issues like TSA, Monsanto, S510, HR 875, Fema camps, fluoride, chemtrails these things are unacceptable, so i hope you will join me in a pursuit for the truth send a sub and throw some friends my way . Anyone who feels they DESERVE TO BE TOLD THE TRUTH i am not a spammer i am just trying to unify the movement. God Bless, much Respect, MTBA
MrTakeBackAmerica 1 year ago
8 not great. 9 fine
starzus 1 year ago
this lady is spot on
biankajeg 1 year ago
can someone please tell me if they use the numbered system in Canada, Or is it just an American sticker system?
Maxmulham 1 year ago
@Maxmulham -
If your food comes prepared or in a package with writing on it, it probably contains ingredients made out of GMO grain.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes thx for the info
Maxmulham 1 year ago
CouldNot CareLes- You obviously work for Monsanto! You have a comment on how Monsanto isn't harmful on numerous youtube videos that are against GMO's. Why are you collaborating with these monsters. They are literally hurting PEOPLE! Wake up Les....and care.
hawkprunty 1 year ago
@hawkprunty - do you even read my posts?
GMOs will kill us.
It is obscene that GMO ingredients are in almost all processed food.
It is a shame that Americans cannot prepare good food for their families.
The Grocery industry is killing us and robbing us blind in the process.
They are able to do it because everyone thinks it is Monsanto's fault.
Thank you for contributing to the problem.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
The biggest thing is to stop buying 'food' at fast food resteraunts.
The GMO industry was built by and for McDonalds and Taco Bell.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
EASY! If it doesn't say "No GMO" then don't buy it!!!!!!
hydrobot2003 1 year ago
Lets take all the GM crops in the world away. Yeeey the worlds would only be able to support 3 billion people
Rogerio34567 1 year ago
@Rogerio34567 In 2006, the U.S department of agriculture issued an official report stating that GMO crop yields are not greater than conventional crop yields. gm foods are mostly consumed by developed nations and will seldom be feeding poverty stricken countries.
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 - USDA 'official report' ? ? ? B.S.
Ever heard of the National Corn Growers independent test plots? There are hundreds of them across the corn belt, all say the same thing.
Yields are twice today what they were twenty years ago.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes "GE crops available for commercial use do not increase the yield potential of a variety. In fact, yield may even decrease.... Perhaps the biggest issue raised by these results is how to explain the rapid adoption of GE crops when farm financial impacts appear to be mixed or even negative"
- US Department of Agriculture report, May 2002"
I got the date wrong but you're still a retard
Les. LOL
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 -
Oh, you read that on the internet, didn't you.
That is not a USDA report friend.
I'll believe the National Corn Growers Independent Test Plot results.
There are thousands of plots across the corn belt, and one of them is two miles from my farm.
Have you ever seen a field?
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes I'm afraid it is a USDA report and you might have confirmed it for yourself with just 5 minutes of research (entering the quote into any search engine). I suppose closing your ears and eyes going "lalallala" is all you're capable of. Here's more:
"The report found that engineered herbicide tolerant soy and maize did not increase yield at the national, aggregate level" - 1999 study by Charles Benbrook
Les,LOL
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 -
a blog is not a source.
You 5 minutes of fumblefucking around is worth just that.
Look for your report on USDA dt gov.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@BOZ11 - OK, now ...
try to forget what the blogger said in his brainfart while you read the report.
I just copied this text out of the report itself.
"All in all, we conclude that there are tangible benefits
to farmers adopting first-generation GE crops."
(and try to respond to the right video next time)
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes You're taking it of context. From the study itself: "Bt crops act as insurance against significant losses that **may occur** in the event of **severe pest infestations**"
So under severe (i.e NOT common) infestations GM crop comes through, and the rest of the time is an uneconomical choice due to the price premium of GM seed. Nice try in being selective. Looking forward to your next BS comment
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 -
I remember the last corn crop I lost to a severe infestation.
I remember the money I spent on insecticide and fungicide to keep that from happening before Bt.
Do you?
BS? We only get one chance to plant a crop each year.
I'll use the best seed thank you.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes So now you're pretending to be a farmer and resorting to anecdotal evidence?
"Since the decision to plant Bt crops must be made prior to observing the insect infestation, the farmer may or may not make the most economical decision for a given year depending upon the resulting infestation" - USDA May 2002
So u bet on a massive infestation every season and just buy GM seed the whole year round whilst it unnecessarily eats into your profit margins? You're smart
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 -
Are you suggesting that I expose myself to the risk of a massive infestation?
Remember, I know what it is like to lose a crop.
Bt corn is cheap insurance.
You don't know what you are talking about.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@BOZ11 - prior to RR soy, we used to bet on a weed infestation each year and incorporate Treflan into the soil before we planted, and then spray Poast over the top immediatly after planting.
That practice was started by the farmers of Grampa's time ... was that a dumb move too?
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes Les, my deficient friend. My argument against the economic viability of GM seed cannot be likened to, nor has any relevance to conventional farming practices, like the use of herbicide. I think you know it, but then I fear I'd be giving you far too much credit. You're done. I shan't responding to any more inanity from you
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 - good,
You are full of shit.
You don't know what you are talking about.
I'll believe the National Corn Growers Independent Test Plot results.
There are thousands of plots across the corn belt, and one of them is two miles from my farm.
Have you ever seen a field?
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes SORRY TO SAY BUT YOU GOT OWNNNNNNEEEEEEEDDDD
100LEGIONS 1 year ago
@100LEGIONS -
I think the folks who feel that GMO crap is food got OWNNNNNNEEEEEEDDDD.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes what ever you say old man LOL all I know is that you got exposed and OWNEDDDDDD LOL. You couldnt even rebuttal lol. Come on less, you shouldnt of let yourself get tossed and manhandled in that way.
100LEGIONS 1 year ago
@100LEGIONS - I can't rebuttal the fact that 80% of what is in your local grocery store are items that duaneintoyo thinks are poison.
Is it really poison? No, but most folks think so.
Tell you what. We'll have all the corn belt farmers quit growing your food.
Then we'll see who got owned.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes Exactly, you cant rebuttal. Poison? As if I eat it, I die right away or in a month or two? Dont take it what Mr.Boz said out of context. He was referring to the long lasting effects of consuming gmos. He really did expose you, you know that.
100LEGIONS 1 year ago
@100LEGIONS -
For every 'study' that shows the harmful effects, there are a dozen showing none.
Most Americans have been eating GMOs for over ten years.
The proof is in the pudding (along with GMOs)
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes Most americans have been eating GMOs for over ten years. You know why? Because they FUCKING DONT KNOW, thats why. Imagine if they knew?
100LEGIONS 1 year ago
@100LEGIONS - Correct.
I never said your study did not reveal that.
Don't you think that companies who market GMO food items to children should put that information on the label?
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes What you are saying is false. A study published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences revealed the parameters of 60 different biochemicals in rats. Rats fed genetically modified corn were compared to their parents who had been fed non-GM corn. The results clearly showed a difference between the two groups. Rats fed GM food had signs of liver and kidney problems. Effects were also found on the heart, adrenal glands, and spleen.
100LEGIONS 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes According to PhysOrg.com, a Russian study found that 55.6 percent of the newborns of female rats fed genetically engineered soy flour before, during, and after pregnancy, died within three weeks. Only 9 percent of the offspring of rats fed non-GM soy died. In addition, 36 percent of the rats in the GM-fed group were underweight, compared with only 6.7 percent of the control group. In humans, the effects of gmos would be more subtle and would not be detected in years.
100LEGIONS 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes You know what, what a great suggestion, everybody growing their own food. People will not be depended on a system which is corrupted by corporations which will put their health at risk. It will be hard and radical change but a change for the better. A change for self awareness and self consciousness.
100LEGIONS 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes What if the majority of the people living in the us informed themselves about gmos? I bet there would be an outcry to stop using Gmos. Then whos wallets would shrink? The farmers incase of an infestation. If this is the way it has to be, then fuck it. Better than putting the population at risk for diseases
100LEGIONS 1 year ago
@100LEGIONS anyone who uses terms like "OWNEDDD" is a fucking tard unworthy of an iota of respect. Probably some goddamn trust fund hipster cunt
Ty311 11 months ago
@CouldNotCareLes ur a terrorist! go away, stop poisoning the kids, you sell out! poor indians, they gave you guys the corn crops and u ruin it, no respect. fucking pure evil, the founding fathers would shit on you, already u violate the constitution, it sayes that its illegal to patent food sources and here u are buying GM bt crop from corruption, i hope u dont wave a american flag cause you are a fake! so sad, u dont even care for the future. i work on an organic farm, i care for this country!
boxa888 1 year ago
@boxa888 -
I'm not a terrorist.
I'm a midwestern farmer.
They calculate that I feed some 300 others with the food I grow.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
I think they"re burning the crap in India because A they can't afford to buy the seeds every year-regular crops give seeds for next year B yields were not bigger in years 3&4 C frankencrops need WAY too much water and D Monsanto has a rude, threatening, nasty manner . They know its unhealthy too, because their animals that got in the field died from eating it. Seems reason enough.
grandmachristine42 1 year ago
excellent info, short, sweet and straight to the point
workoutmaster 1 year ago
I just love Shelly Roche! She delivers such horrible and deadly news all while keeping the most beautiful smile on her face. Very pleasant to look at and quite easy on the eyes.
Keep up the good work!
Brasscos 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes NOTE: Of-course elementally water, etc can be chemically altered via adding other (advantageous & disadvantageous) elements to it.
Christians4Christ101 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CouldNotCareLes Nitrogen, Bromine, Thorium, Uranium, Thallium, Titanium, Caesium, Selenium, Tantalum, Tungsten, Beryllium, Cadmium, Tellurium, Hydrogen, Antimony, Rubidium, Strontium, Vanadium, Scandium, Samarium, Zirconium, Potassium, Chromium, Aluminium, Manganese, Lanthanum, Magnesium, Germanium, Phosphorus & Molybdenum.
Christians4Christ101 1 year ago
How many are viewing this while drinking soda?
Most soda is water and GMO corn ... that's it.
Keep chuggin' folks (oh, and complain about the GMO food supply that you helped create and support with your grocery dollars)
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
@CouldNotCareLes Water (i.e., H₂O = O₂ ⇆ H₂) is a quantum universal elemental solvent exteriorly consisting of Protons (i.e., p⁺) Neutrons (i.e., n⁰) & Electrons (i.e., e⁻) &, or is the base(s) for all alcoholic &, or nonalcoholic beverages & is the base(s) for all living organic O₂ breathing E = m (i.e., energy matter) organisms & CAN NOT ever be any GMO's, since it DO NOT have any DNA &, or RNA code(s). Thus as a Black God Man, etc I impartially & say you're 100% incorrect in insinuating it.
Christians4Christ101 1 year ago
@Christians4Christ101 - what are you talking about?
The water isn't GMO (of course) ... the corn is.
Les
CouldNotCareLes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CouldNotCareLes The human body consists of the following sixty (i.e., 60) E = m chemical elements & some of them are toxic, poisonous, radioactive &, or explosive:
Tin, Iron, Zinc, Lead, Gold, Silver, Sulfur, Boron, Iodine, Nickel, Cobalt, Silicon, Indium, Copper, Cerium, Yttrium, Barium, Carbon, Oxygen, Arsenic, Lithium, Radium, Gallium, Mercury, Sodium, Calcium, Fluorine, Niobium, Bismuth, Chlorine,
Christians4Christ101 1 year ago
Avoid? I embrace GMO!
ostapslobodian 1 year ago
After conducting studies on rodents that were fed Monsanto GM corn, The Committee of Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering stated that:
"The data "clearly underlines adverse impacts on kidneys and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, as well as different levels of damages to heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system," reported Gilles-Eric Séralini, a molecular biologist at the University of Caen."
If GM corn is killing rats, what is it doing to us?
HuckMeHard 1 year ago
As a Back God Man, etc I say that The Gods & the elect knows100% why GMO's, etc was created by Satan via his naturally born-wicked Edomite people for genocide, or reducing Earth's population, thus explains why Illuminati society (i.e., ∆) members (Evelyn Rothschild, Bill Gates, etc) supports it. Cesare Borgia, the fake Jews, etc courtesy of Satan's Edomites.
Job 9:24 (KJV)
The earth is given into the hand of the wicked: he covereth the faces of the judges thereof; if not, where, and who is he?
Christians4Christ101 1 year ago
As a geneticist, etc I say, the girl reading the script &, or anyone else thinking they can avoid GMO's is 100% incorrect & DO NOT understand the definition of "organisms" (any biological life forms such as; humans, animals, plants, insects, fungus & bacterium). All livestock are genetically modified from conception & fed GM feed, starch food (pastas, fruits, seeds, beans, rices, breads, corn, potatoes, cereals, etc) is also GM foods. FYI: In the USA & Canada GM foods are purposely not labeled.
Christians4Christ101 1 year ago
There is a reason that Nature does not allow plants and animals to breed across the species DNA barrier. Through violent GE processes, Monsanto forces trans-species (and even trans-kingdom) plant varieties. This is dangerous. There is no way that any science can prove that genetic engineering is safe – the technologies do not exist to know or measure all the health-safety effects. Speak up..! Do not allow Monsanto to pollute the world’s seed supply..! We cannot recall bad DNA.
33tracker 1 year ago 40
@33tracker So what are all these side effects of eating transgenic plants?
sparkylovesmangos 1 year ago
@33tracker
OH NO! THIS IS DANGEROUS! THE PLANTS HAVE ONE FIREFLY TRAIT AND THUS ARE HUNGRY FOR HUMAN FLESH! EVERYBODY RUN! NATURE DIDN'T INTEND FOR ORGANISMS TO GET A TRAIT THAT ANOTHER ORGANISM NATURALLY EVOLVED TO HAVE!
@sugoo2
OH GOD! EUGENICS! JUST LIKE IN THE HOLOCAUST! (*Disregarding that humans have done eugenics on animals for hundreds of thousands of years (thus the dog and housecat and race horse and dairy cow were invented)*)
handsockpuppet 1 year ago
there are series consequences of GMO foods that contain high levels of pesticides..
these mimic estrogen in the body (xenoestrogens) and create estrogen pool overload which eventually makes women have cystic breasts, ovaries, and a very painful disease called endometriosis , these symptoms will mostly likely cause infertility long term if not cause breast or uterus cancers..
thanks again goes to our 'public servants' for poisoning us and shortening our lives.. GMO is basically Eugenics.. !
sugoo2 1 year ago 16
@sugoo2 "basically" it IS eugenics! Don't forget the 46% GM Corn syrup solids in infant formula with an additional 6.5% sugar and of course it's GM soy based and then all those GM Corn derived "nutrients" There is a reason that these things are approved by WIC and the government. There is a reason why they discourage breast feeding for the poor. They want them dead because they think they are a drain on society! These poisons retard their brains and make them that way
Leonicdragon 1 year ago
@Leonicdragon yes and of course all the rest of the poisons in everyday life.. only education will help u there.. the NWO are targetting mainly black and indigenious communities as a priority (see haiti).. but they do have an agenda for all of us though,,they want us monitored, sick and dependant on addictions, pharma etc
These nazis favour the blonde, blue eyed A blood types, they are far easier to programme and control.. not many of them left out there though..they sacrificed them all !
sugoo2 1 year ago
@sugoo2
What's this silly theory about type A Blue eyed Blond being easier to control?
barzouf94 1 year ago
@barzouf94 - its true, why do u think it was hitlers motives to keep the aryan race..?
why all the blond bimbo jokes...?
sugoo2 1 year ago
@sugoo2
Stereotypes I would say, not that I'm offended as a B type misanthropist! It's like astrology in a sense, it's fun to read but don't take it too seriously.
barzouf94 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sugoo2 do your part, spread organic heirloom food seed far and wide, its called "johnny appleseed economics" or "gorrila gardens", spread more organic food than GMO and you will water down the effects and if everyone becomes self suffcient at their homes it will stop GMO right in its tracks, if there is enough people it will save our food system, thats how you win! wake up everyone, do your part if u are angry, get seed and make a organic revolution your way.
boxa888 1 year ago
Great info !! Thanks . This must be your new channel Matrix. God bless. G
Indiansmoke1 1 year ago 2
nice video. Thank you miss.
Frosti2008 1 year ago
@masluxx win.
SamuraiTankyuusha 1 year ago
Well thanks for the label tip at least..
SamuraiTankyuusha 1 year ago
her hair is not natural; her makeup is not natural - hypocrisy
mlee952 1 year ago
@mlee952 neither are her shoes. But those things she is not eating. Try using that thing on top of your shoulders for more then a hat rack.
masluxx 1 year ago
@mlee952 Come on at least her breasts are natural. I'll give her a 8 out of 10 for the info and the red tops.
Standingwithfeast 1 year ago 2
thank you.
JohnnyHorton 1 year ago
Monsanto contaminated the air, lakes, rivers and soil of Anniston Alabama with toxic PCB’s. This act also, of course, poisoned the people of Anniston. So now you have to ask yourself: Did Monsanto know that the PCB’s they were flooding Anniston with were toxic? Let’s give Monsanto the benefit of the doubt and say ‘No, they didn’t know’. Then you have to ask yourself: What does Monsanto not know about the toxic effects of the GMO’s they are selling?
357935x 1 year ago
@BradLauber : Your illogic is incomrehensible. Sorry, you’re not worth the time. Eat GMO's, feed 'em to your kids. Write Monsanto love letters or whatever else status quo Monsanto groupies do.
---
For those of you with a grasp of the history of science and it's tragic (and many times "fatal") mistakes: say NO to Monsanto. Say NO to genetically engineered food. Watch "The World According to Monsanto" or "The Future of Food". Get the Truth. Make up your own mind. Think critically.
357935x 1 year ago
@BradLauber : You're being evasive. If I were defending a company as dark and dastardly, as disrespectul of living things as Monsanto, I would be evasive, too.
---
So science didn't work 10 years ago but it works now?! Interesting perspective. Is that what your Zen is all about? Respond to the Pusztai study - peer reviewed by 3 times the normal number of scientists - a study that clearly demonstrates the TOXIC nature of genetically engineered food.
357935x 1 year ago
@357935x I already responded to your study. It was a good study 10 years ago. And if you believe that a mousse digestive tract is similar to humans... basically if you think people are rats... and if you like to use decade old research in a cutting edge technology industry... then yes your study is relevant. I am abundantly familiar with this study and even read it when it came out, A DECADE AGO! It has been discredited by many later studies like this one... cont...
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x Please respond to this study... it is from 2007 and is now almost considered obsolete b/c of the new finding in the last 3 years... but the basic principal is still widely accepted among the scientific community.
w w w . ac sh . org / facts fears / news ID . 962 / news _ detail . asp
Why do u have to make me your enemy to have this conversation? Why do you continue to insist that i am "defending Monsanto"? I am simply trying to educate one that fears the unknown
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber - Read your own posts - you don't respond to the evidence that people have offered you. Instead you claim that people offered you no evidence. You call people "haters". That supposed to be scientific? "Haters" is entirely your own projection.
---
It's hard to defend the safety of genetically morphed seeds created by a toxic chemical company with a history like Monsanto's. There is absolutely no good reason to trust Monsanto. Maybe that's what you are bent out of shape about?
357935x 1 year ago
@stupid#'sguyx ... The only evidence that I have seen to date is: the NY time’s article from 2007 and a study from 1999 that talks about the unknowns of biotech and the unknown effects. In 1999 that was a relevant and good study... but over 10 years later in 2010 that study is obsolete. Many of the "unknown risks" discussed in the 99' study are now known... and know to be safe for human consumption. For the last time this is not about Monsanto... it’s about Molecular engineering.
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935xI will respond to a recent study that shows evidence of your claims. Not a columnist’s opinion article or decade old research. I am still waiting for objective 3rd party evidence to prove your claims that GM is harmful to human kind. Cite it and stop trying to BS your way out of citing the evidence. You are not good at BS; I will wipe the floor with you if all you got is BS and opinions. CITE EVIDENCE or admit u have none...
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber I can't speak for 357935xI but, personally I'm not running around claiming that GMO's are bad... I'm saying that they could potentially be linked to the drastic increase of health problems that have popped up in the last half a century.
smilesgirl17 1 year ago
@smilesgirl17 The increased # or REPORTED illnesses in the last 50 yrs could also have something to do with the fact the world pop has gone from 3.5 billion to over 6 billion. Don’t you think doubling the world population would lead to an increased # of reported illnesses? When was the first effective MRI machine created? I think it was 1957 and they were not widely used until the late 60's. We only discovered about 2/3 of the types of cancer etc. in the last 50 yrs... Cont...
BradLauber 1 year ago
@smilesgirl17 Now realizing that we could not even diagnose most types of cancer until the 60's and given that our ability to find and diagnose illnesses and to understand their effect has expanded, we are getting healthier overall it is just that we are apparently getting worse at simple arithmetic. OF COURSE a growing world population and increased ability to find and diagnose illnesses, we did not even know about 50 yrs ago, is going to increase the # of REPORTED illnesses...cont...
BradLauber 1 year ago
@smilesgirl17 Take a look at simple lifespan data... it hardly points to a sinister "conspiracy" of big ag or bio-tech to kill off all the customers. The simple fact remains that we are getting healthier overall and that life spans are increasing and have accelerated that increase with modern practices... clean water, good hygiene, better medical practices and HEALTHIER FOOD. As soon as Modern crop sciences became a part of the food chain... all of the sudden the lifespan chart goes way up ???
BradLauber 1 year ago
To all the haters... I am not here to defend or try to justify anything. I started this with a simple question; what are you basing you theories that GM aka "modern crop sciences" are harmful or a net loss for humanity? That was my original question and that is all I wondered. As expected you all blew this way out of proportion claiming; that I’m at the center of some conspiracy to defend Monsanto or big agri biz. I don’t get the impression anyone is trying to find truth here, just destruction
BradLauber 1 year ago
Bill and Linda Gates are Mr & Mrs Typhoid Mary,Gates foundation is spreading cancer,aids,numerous long term sickness as part of NWO Eugenics program cause their view is"world is over populated" but Gate's do not take any vaccines themselves-these criminals need to be arrested.GMO foods are poison,Began by Bush Senior&Monsanto&Gates Foundation want to kill off the masses. Eugenics are standard policies of western Governs since 1960's if you don't believe-hurry up and die from your H1n1 poisons.
exposetruthwolf 1 year ago
@exposetruthwolf I don't take the flu vaccine because it now contains 3 times the mercury levels it had in the 1970's and we had problems with it back then. If people that make the flu vaccine don't want to take it, why should I? Did Donald Rumsfeld (former CEO of Searles Pharma that is owned by Monsanto) ever take the vaccine? Probably not. Do I trust Donald Rumsfeld after his opinions of WMD's in Iraq? Nope, he just got richer at everybody else's expense and sleeps like a baby at night.
MegaTmarshall 1 year ago
@MegaTmarshall Why do you think mercury is put into vaccinations, it's not just about money, what will such high level of mercury do to a 1 yr olds brain? nelson rockafeller set up the Am public Education saying:I want a nation of workers not thinkers." Why have the rocka fellers family only married their distant cousins for 3 generations?
exposetruthwolf 1 year ago
Bill and Linda Gates are Mr & Mrs Typhoid Mary,Gates foundation is spreading cancer,aids,numerous long term sickness as part of NWO Eugenics program cause their view is"world is over populated" but Gate's donot take any vaccines themselves-these criminals need to be arrested.GMO foods are poison, Monsanto & Gates Foundation collaborate to kill off the masses. Eugenics programs are standard policies of western Governs since 1960's if you don't believe-hurry up and die from your H1n1 poisons.
exposetruthwolf 1 year ago
@BradLauber : The 1999 peer reviewed Pusztai experiment that demonstrated the TOXIC nature of GMO's was peer reviewed by 6 reviewers - three times the usual number. Five gave it the green light to be published in The Lancet.
---
You ask for a peer reviewed study proving the TOXIC nature of GMO's. When I provide one, you make lame excuses.
---
People who visit this site should know that you not really into science. You are into white washing Monsanto. You’re a Monsanto Groupie.
357935x 1 year ago
@BradLauber :You stated below that Monsanto was sorry for poisoning the people of Anniston, AL with toxic PCB's.
---
Monsanto also poisoned the town of Nitro, WV with dioxins. When the Nitro folks confronted Monsanto with this, Monsanto stated that the allegations of the citizens of Nitro were "without merit" and Monsanto promises to vigorously defend itself.
---
Monsanto is sorry for Anniston but not for Nitro??
---
As a Monsanto groupie, Brad, can you please explain this??
357935x 1 year ago
If you would like a well referenced book on the research try reading Genetic Roulette by Michael Taylor.
And in case you don't get the connections; scientific journals are published by donations from Kodak, Monsanto, BASF, etc.
moles2000 1 year ago
@BradLauber - Brad, I would reword the Monsanto line on your website to read:
---
The Monsanto Co. - Applied Molecular Genetics could be the dark engine of annihilation of human genetics, health & wellbeing, the de-realization of human potential, disabling the human imagination to figure out how to clean up after all of Monsanto's toxic waste dumps and DNA contamination worldwide. Check this company out!
---
You have inspired me! Thank you. (I won't tell Monsanto).
357935x 1 year ago
@357935x I think I get it now... you only trust the science that confirms your predetermined notion of what you want to be true. That is not very objective. That is again, like the 100th example of how you only look for what you want to see. You only look for what you want to be true. Try this sometime; just look for the evidence and let it lead you to a conclusion rather that the other way around... that is sort of how scientific method it is supposed to work, just a thought.
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber That is the stupidist thing I hvae heard. Look around and see what pops up then try to apply it to some unknown objective to which you may then come up witha hypothesis. What kind of scientific study is that? What scientist uses that method?
Not the science i have used in any research project.
moles2000 1 year ago
They sure interupte the natural cycle in a ecosystem , but that's the last thing we should be worring about when we are about to have a nuclear war in any day or second.
By the time we see the problems that "GMO'S" will cause to the planet are species will be already extcint.
u are completly headless!
p.d. I'm am 14years old and live in a 3rd world country , i'm sure u don't know what that means:D soo any way ... u are a stupid!
youtubsuxfv 1 year ago
OMG u are soo stupid!
Did u know that the use of gmo has helped no end a big part of world hunger!
Yes they are genetically modificated organisimes , but they are modificated for a reason!
Because they give more product , more fast , and in less time!
FYI:There is know scientific evidence that sustance that "GMO'S" are dangerous or cause deseases like cancer , luecimia or other health problems!
youtubsuxfv 1 year ago
By the way, the people who died from L-Tryptophan died because it was genetically modified, not natuural tryptophan. There is research on this if you cared to see any opposition to your story. That was when they took L-Tryptophan off the market.
But I guess death is not enough evidence???
moles2000 1 year ago
@moles2000 Death is really good evidence actually. However you must establish the reason for the death. If you can cite me definitive proof that withstands the scrutiny of scientific method that proves that these deaths were caused by gm I’d absolutely like to see it. It would represent a scientific breakthrough to find this evidence. As you would be the only one that had. You all don’t seem to get that your opinions are not evidence. They are humorous opinions just not evidence
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber What you are asking is for us to hand over research because you are too lazy to look it up yourself. I gave you a book to read that was full of citations of real research. Do you need a book on tape???
moles2000 1 year ago
@BradLauber - By the way, Pusztai got fired for publicizing the results of his study demonstrating the harmful effects of a genetically engineered crop. That's the environment that scientists who buck the rich and unscrupulous biotech industry (and the biotech controlled FDA and USDA) are working in.
---
Pro-GMO propaganda is about money - nothing else.
---
Say NO to GMO's, NO to Monsanto - 10 years from now you'll be very glad you did.
357935x 1 year ago
@357935x You can't have it both ways... in one comment you deny the legitimacy of peer review and scientific study and say that we can’t trust any studies or science itself to lead us to conclusions b/c they are "paid for by corps". Then, in the same comment, you cite a peer reviewed scientific study trying to back up your claims. Who do you think paid for the Pusztai study? So which is it... we can or we can’t trust science. You don’t get to have your cake and eat it too. Cliché but true
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber - Bottom line on biotech science: If your company donates enough money to my university, I'll give you "peer reviewed science" that concludes anything you want.
---
I gave you a peer reviewed study demonstrating the harmful effects of GMO's. You chose to ignore it and to defend yourself with personal attacks. Not cool.
---
Pusztai: 1999 Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet. 354:1353-4.
357935x 1 year ago
@357935x So, you deny the legitimacy of science... we all get it. We have heard it 1000 times from you. What peer reviewed study did you cite me as evidence? I have never seen any evidence from you other than an article from the NY times written by a journalist that was telling us her opinion on GM. That is not actual evidence that is the media discussing unproven evidence and its potential effect on the industry. Its 2010 we have learned much since Pusztai and the 1999 study
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber - What you call "facts" are nothing but propaganda - follow the money trail. Instead of avoiding this question (again), please answer. It's a simple true/false question: Did Monsanto know that they were poisoning Anniston, AL with PCBs?
---
If YES: Then they should be banned from doing business (let alone genetically morphing the world's seed supply);
---
If NO: Then their scientists aren't very smart and they should be banned from genetically morphing the world's seed supply;
357935x 1 year ago
@357935x Chemical Dioxin plants are a dangerous thing to own and operate. I agree that Mon was in the total wrong when they poisoned those innocent people. Monsanto at that point dumped all "chemical" plants b/c of the liability. Today for liability purposes they do not own or operate a single dioxin plant in the country. Conversely their #1 competition DuPont is one of the only Dioxin plant owners in the world. Why not any concern for the STILL operating DuPont Dioxin plant in Miss???
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x Chemical production is a liability heavy industry and smart co's are getting out or outsourcing it to china or India. Any company that operates and dumps dioxins into the water supply should be harshly penalized. Again... why only concentrating on Monsanto? They don't even operate a dioxin facility anywhere anymore. ..Cont
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x If you were truly concerned for the innocent I would think you would be crusading to shut down the operational DuPont facility in Miss that still dumps 300 + parts per million of dioxins into the local swamplands and not spend your time looking back at an incident almost 2 decades old. I’m not suggesting that Mon is any better but at least they recognized they were wrong and stopped the wicked practice of Dioxin dump age.
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x By the way... my facts are peer reviewed, from scientific journals and withstand the scrutiny of scientific method. Which is more than we can say about your "Google it" research techniques. Who has referenced "food Inc" or the "world according to Mon" or "11 reasons to distrust Monsanto" as evidence? You have. I have only cited articles and papers from actual accredited scientific journals. Seriously you r 1 of the most intellectually lazy people I have ever spoken too about this
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x It’s become quite clear that u r not interested in "fact finding" you are interested in making Monsanto look "evil". You are trying to call Mon out on a practice they no longer participate in but DuPont does. Yet you don’t even mention DuPont. Hmm. Appears that you have a bit of a chip on your shoulder. Seriously... why not even mention DuPont they still dump dioxins into ground water. But no, nothing. I get the idea you’re not interested in helping people only destroying Monsanto
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber Brad would you care to comment on this "The Washington Post identified ACSH as "an industry-friendly group whose board member Betsy McCaughey helped set off the "death panels" frenzy" in the 2009 health care reform debate.
edgeman148 1 year ago
@edgeman148 Oh my, we couldn’t have "groups" that are friendly to "industries". What will happen then? Groups everywhere just being friendly to industries! Who do these "groups" think they are? Don’t they know that edgeman demands that all groups be unfriendly to industries! What is your point about ACSH? And what is your problem with old Betsy? And if you have not figured it out our gov't just took over health care and has passed a bill that authorizes "end of life panels" more PC for you
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber Thank you for your response, there is little evidence that the evolution of the agribusiness paradigm has benefited humanity but then again, perhaps it was not ever meant to do so. I am not demanding anything, I do not need to do so. My point was merely to amplify the fact that there are many organizations and institutions with specious names and different agendas which seem removed from their names. Honesty is the best policy.
edgeman148 1 year ago
@Bradlauber - Yup ... we are miles apart. But if you believe that "the epidemic levels of diabetes, Alzheimer’s, autism, impotence, infertility, dramatically reduced testosterone levels, cancers, allergies, & obesity that we have witnessed in the USA over the last decade" are just BS, then run that "really scientific feeling of yours" by Monsanto. They'll probably love it!
---
For the rest of us - best to stay clear of GMO's. I don't even feed them to my dogs. Don't have the heart.
357935x 1 year ago
@357935x Again, show me the definitive proof that any of these so-called "epidemics" are caused by GM. BTW an epidemic is when an infectious disease is spreading quickly. Do u honestly believe that all of these conditions are new and have never been a problem in the past? Considering the world population has doubled in 100 yrs. and that there are no detailed or reliable records of medical conditions or treatments from hundreds of years ago ... cont.
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x Perhaps if you did not go looking for what you want the evidence to say and actually understood what the evidence actually indicates maybe you would realize that an increased # of reported cases of any or all of the conditions you mentioned are a matter of simple arithmetic. More people = more cases and better record keeping and a better understanding of diseases has lead to more diagnosis also increasing the #. We are getting healthier overall. u apparently just suck at simple math
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x Seriously, have you not considered that an increasing population will lead to an increased # reported cases of illness? Have you seriously not considered that we did not really know what cancer even was until the invention of the MRI about 50 yrs ago? Do you not understand that we could not diagnose or report but a fraction of medical conditions hundreds of years ago? Do you not realize that life spans are increasing not decreasing? Oh yea... I forgot you can’t do simple arithmetic.
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x Just admit that your hatred of technology is baseless. Thats ok... not everyone is a scientist or a mathmatecian (obviously) If you "just dont like GM" thats fine, in fact thats great. The world needs somone to eat the toxoc fungi rich organic and whole foods. When insects bore into plant tissue they leave behind pathogenic fungi; a known cause of cancer and spinabifida etc. But hey, don't trust the evidence, just trust your "heart" or you "intuition". MMM cancer pathogens r delicious!
BradLauber 1 year ago
@357935x dont believe me... copy paste this link into google
w w w . ac sh . org / facts fears / news ID . 962 / news _ detail . asp
woops... another pesky fact that disproves your theories. Sorry.
Enjoy your "whole foods"
BradLauber 1 year ago
@Bradlauber And here's how much Monsanto cares about the safety of it's genetically morphed seeds:
---
Monsanto's director of corporate communications explained the company's regulatory philosophy to Michael Pollan in 1998: "Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA's job."
---
Monsanto's unfair influence over the FDA is legendary - so I guess we can't count on the FDA either.
357935x 1 year ago
@357935x I did not ask for more bs. You aint that good at bs. I asked for any kind or reasoning beyond "I just hate" for your theories about GM. All you continue to come back with is "science sucks" and "I don’t have any proof" or " google it" . If you just distrust GM that is good for you. We should each walk our own road. My only point to all of you is; there is no "proof" either way. Please stop claiming to know-for-certain something that is an unknown quantity at this point and time.
BradLauber 1 year ago
@BradLauber - I think that what turns people off most about your argument is simply this: "absence of proof is not proof of absence".
---
You prove it..! Prove that the epidemic levels of diabetes, Alzheimer’s, autism, impotence, infertility, dramatically reduced testosterone levels, cancers, allergies, & obesity that we have witnessed in the USA over the last decade are NOT due to genetically engineered seeds which were first marketed (not in 1986 as you stated), but in 1996. Prove it!
357935x 1 year ago