Added: 2 years ago
From: ILYIAB
Views: 7,598
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (333)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ILYIAB So U do believe that global warming is real, right? The video isn't clear as to whether it supports or denies global warming.

  • @Proemed Global Warming is real.

  • Your whole argument against global warming is who produced the graphs@ LOL, independent published studies, historical data across the world proves you wrong.

  • @Proemed You do understand that global warming is real, and my title is just sarcastic?

  • In 1965 dry atmosphere contained 0.032 % of CO2. Today it contains 0.039 % of CO2...

  • God uses challenges to make us ROOOCK!

    Yes, excess co2 is as real as you and me... sad but true... haaaha!

  • I can't believe that it's been two months since the last post... yet This was one of the first "things" I saw when "utubnit".

    Anyways, WE put out more CO2 than current volcanism.

    Anyway, IF the medieval warm period had such (proven) increase of CO2 (as today), well, things would be all different (LIKE F'N VENUS!).

    What's with all these UNscientific people F'n with the truth... Some call it global warming. I CALL IT WHAT IT IS... simply excess CO2, (why F with our air!).

  • @fireofenergy "Anyway, IF the medieval warm period had such (proven) increase of CO2 (as today), well, things would be all different (LIKE F'N VENUS!)."

    except you're missing a huge point. You are assuming all warming or colling is done by CO2

    So you're assuming the medieval period was caused by co2.

    What about the sun? The most obvious cause of warming and cooling on our planet. Slight % changes in the sun's output affect this planet more than anything

  • ‘Record UK temperature for October set at 29.9C

    Temperatures in England topped those in Athens, Los Angeles and Barcelona’

    h tp://w ww.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15137832

    OK you deniers, where has your new ‘LIA’ gone to?

  • @blackadderthe4 that doesnt prove anything, abnormal weather isnt and has neer been uncommon or unheard of

  • @BrettJRipley

    'that doesnt prove anything' correct! But when KKDeniers (KlimateKhanceDeniers) say there is a new 'LIA' on the way, just because the Sun is due to go into a quiet period, possibly, then that lets me use the recent weather, in the UK, to wonder where is the 'LIA' coming from?

  • Comment removed

  • Gotta love greenman3610

    he straightens up all the lies, but hes different compared to many others on youtube, he sites his sources with a web camera so its easy for us to go to the source ourselves.

    should subscribe to him.

  • Comment removed

  • @tvsux1 "The fact is that less and less people are buying the global warming hoax everyday" - LOL

    Follow the evidence Watson. Follow the evidence.

  • Comment removed

  • @tvsux1 That made no sense. Now everyone get to see your amazing brain power through your comment. Good luck!

  • @2wheels88 I recommend this for all the dumb-asses out there.

  • @ILYIAB Yeah I think it's a good Idea but if you want people to learn you need to stop insulting them otherwise they won't look at the new science.Also most people under 25 yrs old have been brainwashed all through school to believe that humans are evil and destroying the earth so they'll need time to come around.To a certain extent many industries are polluting the earth and need to be restricted in some way but CO2 is plant food not a pollutant,Water Vapor is the main greenhouse gas.Cheers!!!

  • Comment removed

  • why not just take a look at what is actually happening and cut the BS, the sea level is not rising and the polar ace sheets are not melting and the hurricanes are not more frequent nor intense. It is the same old line of BS, if it a warm event then it is a clear sign of climate change but if it is three consecutively cold winters the it is just weather. If this is true why haven't all time high temperature records been broken?

  • @jdougswallow Why not learn to write a proper sentence?

    Are you talking about this year? Or what's true for the last 50 years?

    Do you understand that 1 year, or even 20 years have no bearing of this? Did you finish High School?

  • @jdougswallow LOL! Thanks! Awesome.

  • Check out Android Widget "Skeptical Science" for info on this

  • We are polluting our oceans too much, so the ocean planktons/animals are dying and they cant store or process enough CO2 to reduce it's concentration. Deforestation is one effect too

  • FIVE REASONS TO WORRY ABOUT THE NEW WORLD ORDER/ ILLUMINATI

    presidential directive 51 is identical to hitler's directive 51

    W199I proves bush protected al queda when CIA members tried to stop them.

    Agenda 21 is the perfect blueprint for the illuminati/NWO

    43 presidents(including obama)are directly descended from King John" Lackland" Plantagenet of England

    Codex Alimentarius if/when implemented will kill off 90% of the population.

    GLOBAL WARMING IS ALIGNED WITH MALIGN INTENT OF POPULATION CONTROL

  • @Bullpuma Dumb as a door nail. Congratulations! Your parents must be proud... or dumb as you.

  • @ILYIAB Great. You didn't make an argument. Why is that? Cos you are... wait for it... DUMB?

  • @Bullpuma and the Aliens from Planet 9 are coming!!! Awwwwww!

  • @ILYIAB there is a reason that that humans cannot make robots that don't lack the qualities of the right side of the human brain. they are using too much left brain to design these robots. scientists and engineers are trying to figure out the algorithm of "intelligence". But there is no algorithm. True intelligence can, will, and only will rise out of chaos. "out of chaos, order will spontaneously arise". if something can happen, it will. manifestation is inevitable. PS: isn't planet 9 pluto? :P

  • The question was never whether we were in a warming trend, only to what degree man made CO2 emissions were the cause of the warming trend. Why did the last great ice age come to an end long before human industry CO2 emissions? Look at the long term charts. Massive temperature fluctuations are the norm, sometimes with very sharp spikes. Alarmists point to a relative blip in the current data and prescribe severe changes in industry and energy policy with attendant massive economic upheaval.

  • @jepkratz and the peer-reviewed paper you ref is???...

  • @ILYIAB Here's a start for a more long term chart: youtube.com/watch?v=tTp5h9BuQt­Q. I suggest there are larger forces at work, solar cycles, volcanic activity, water vapor IR absorption, etc, than man contributed CO2. The historical global temperature records back that up. What factors caused the Pleistocene ice age (or more recent little ice age) to end, obviously without any contribution from human industry? Are these factors not still at work? Climate fluctuation is NORMAL.

  • @jepkratz I'll watch. Where's the peer-reviewed paper this is based on?

    There isn't one. Dumb ass!

  • @ILYIAB Very scientific reply! I'll leave the peer review to the scientists. There are many who do not subscribe to the IPCC. I have done a cursory check on Prof. Carter's bonafides, and not found him wanting. I simply find it curious that nature can find the means to warm an ice age before human ingenuity held sway.

    You have posted your views on youtube, you can hardly suggest it is a venue in which viable ideas cannot exist, can you? Youtube invites debate. Let's keep it civil, shall we?

  • @jepkratz I'll keep it civil as long as you provide proper ref. like scholar.google something?

  • @ILYIAB Please visit (all the wwws dot) aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/­200807/index.cfm for a PDF download from the American Physical Society itself a non-aligned arbiter/publisher of a scientific debate over the IPCC conclusion between Christopher Monckton and UC San Luis Obispo's David Hafemeister and Peter Schwartz. I find the case for actual cooling 2001 to 2008 compelling. Personally, I am not pro-pollution, I think to a large degree politics has hi-jacked the scientific debate.

  • @jepkratz You mention Monckton. He's a tool and dishonest idiot. He's won awards for being stupid. Thanks for playing.

  • @ILYIAB Typical - attack the man, not the data. Science is all about the data. Explain to me why the famous "hockey stick" temp. vs time graph only goes back to about 1800 to give the impression of a great impact of human industry upon climate change that just does not bear out when compared to hundreds of thousands of years of NATURAL FLUCTUATIONS per the Greenland ice cores, with many warmer and colder periods than the relatively recent and stable holocene epoch?

  • @jepkratz You are deficient in searching the Monckton debunking? Funny!

    He's so discredited for lying that even GW Bush would look like a saint.

    He is a tool and dishonest. This is fact. And it's available for your viewing pleasure.

  • @ILYIAB Again attacking the man (ad hominem) not the data. Did you even bother to read the paper I referenced? It has both pro and con arguments on the question of anthropogenic climate change. I would understand perhaps, as a youtube uploader, you may tire of repeating your arguments, but do you not have any saved replies to the question: Why is the global temperature record over many hundreds of thousands of years replete with dramatic fluctuations up and down prior to human intervention?

  • @jepkratz He's discredited for not representing the data but for making shit up, claiming he represents the data. You never saw the data I suspect. He lies and gets gigs to talk so he can make money. Everything he says has been thougholy gutted to pieces because he misrepresents the data! Follow the data!

  • @jepkratz Let me tell you this very slowly, cos you seem hard of understanding... I f i t's n o t p e e r r e v i w e d i t's b o ll o ck s!

    I didn't attack Moncton's arguments cos they have been destroyed seconds after he made them. I call him a dishonest idiot, cos he is! Thus, not an ad Hominem. Idiot!

    All your BS can be cured by going to school. Sign up for university now!

  • @ILYIAB Never mind that the peer review process has been perverted by political and research funding concerns, but since you seem to think seconds is all it takes to conduct a peer review, your opinion is suspect.

    I quote your post, "You mention Monckton. He's a tool and dishonest idiot." You make no refutation of his arguments, only assertions about personal character, hence ad hominem - to the man. You still haven't answered how historical ice ages could have warmed prior to human industry.

  • @jepkratz So you think that peer-review, that has thousand of scientists have been paid of?! By politics?

    And you never tried to search "Monchton debunked"?

    He's shamed!

  • @ILYIAB Debunked by the very scientists that have been "paid-off" with billions in climate research funding - those who tow the IPCC line! Why do the names of hundreds of scientists who have backed away from the politics driven IPCC still remain on the lists of "supporters" of its claims?

    It's funny how you still can't bring yourself to acknowledge that the climate has previously been warmer and colder than present, these changes have often been dramatic, and all without anthropogenic causes!

  • @ILYIAB School ot university wont teach you that humans are causing the global warming, simply because there is no evidence of it. And if there is no evidence, that is not a proven fact, therefore cannot be taught in schools, or universities.

  • @ILYIAB Shit! We are on the same side?! I gotta stop drinking.

  • @ILYIAB Oh, and you still never answered how nature itself ever managed to warm itself out of either the Pleistocene "big" ice age, or even the more recent "little" ice age from the medieval period. What factors could possibly have been at work to warm these ice ages without the benefit of human interference of any scale? Have those factors somehow been removed from normal fluctuating climate function?

  • @jepkratz ¨Learn some science will you?

  • @jepkratz Monckton is a proven charlatan and have even been pissed in the face by the British Gov't! That's your ref?

    Look for cooling from 1920 and 2010 and the story is very different.

    Sorry but I have to say it. Dumb Ass!

  • @ILYIAB So you never watched; "youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9G­c­I&feature=related" a four part series from New Zealand's Professor Bob Carter (see wikipedia for his credentials). You also still FAIL to answer how, for example, the Pleistocene and Medieval "little" ice ages ever managed to warm without help from anthropogenic causes, or for that matter how previous warm periods (warmer than today, and pre-anthropogenic) ever managed to cool. Climate fluctuation, often dramatic, is NORMAL!

  • @jepkratz Not a peer-reviewed paper.

  • @ILYIAB The peer review process has been perverted by politics and research funding, yet thousands of scientists have backed away from the IPCC, but their names still appear as contributors. Fact, we have been on a cooling trend since 1998. Fact, data going back hundreds of thousands of years from the Greenland ice cores shows the climate has been both warmer and colder than today, and that fluctuation is NORMAL. Fact, anthropogenic CO2 has far less effect than solar cycles & volcanic activity.

  • @ILYIAB Here's another youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9Gc­I&feature=related It's a four part utube series on a lecture from New Zealand's Professor Bob Carter (see wikipedia). For what it's worth, I humbly suggest you give this series an objective, scientific viewing. In the politically charged climate change debate it is hard to maintain objectivity.

  • ive never believed this bullshit, ill keep using my car and enjoying my life ;)

  • @ralphfirst You can still do that in a hybrid. Even if GB is false (which it isn't), why not work for a better environment and technology anyway? The US is falling sooooo far in all areas cos of nutcase republicans. I thank them cos now the EU and Asia will take over...

  • Being a lie or not a lie, to me it doesn't matter. What matters the most is the fact that we are not part of the life cycle of nature. We put ourselves and our demands outside the boundries of neture. We call ourselves civilized when in reality we cannot make reason with any of the facts presented. To me the idea is: Is the planet warming up? YES! Could that be because of us? MAYBE... Should we try our best to balance our existance? DEFINITELY!!! Helping or not we should use common sense ALWAYS!

  • @binhonz Agreed! Great comment.

    "Could that be because of us? MAYBE" - Sorry. That should be a YES. Science is a cruel bitch. :-)

    Have a great day!

  • I beieve that global warming is real. It is a scientifiaclly proven fact. And i think we all need to change. The reason that we deny it is because making this change is inconvienient and hard and if something is hard and there is an easier way out like believing something is fake whenver any other theory is presented you take it

  • @guitarkidsbc I agree. I'm sorry if the title of the vid confused you. I want to draw ignorant ppl who do not understand GW to this vid. Sorry for my deception, and thanks for your comment!

  • What is the best way to control the world? Make up a lie " Global Warming" make laws that take away peoples freedom and go to war with anyone who doesn't do what they want. This is all about contral and power and nothing else and if you think it is not you need to look back at history. I think it is a good idea to clean up our inviroment, but it should not be doen by making crazy laws that will kill our freedoms and tax you to death. Socialists do not care about this planet, only power!!

  • @jmkaudio Thanks for you inane comments.

  • @jmkaudio If you are correct, then all the scientific bodies that professionally study these phenomena worldwide would all have to be "in" on the conspiracy. They would all have to have abandoned their scientific integrity to help establish political power of Who exactly? I think your conspiracy theory needs some work.

  • i think global warmen ist a lie ^^

  • Here is my drop in the bucket. My opinion on global warming is that this warming period could be due to the changes of earths magnetic field from the expontentially increasing rate of our magnetic pole shift. However, this does not change the fact that if we need to change over to cleaner ways of providing energy because if we continue to poison our planet which destroys ecosystem after ecosystem, it will soon be OUR system that is killed off.

  • @xinecallaw The magnetic pole shifting does not effect temperature since the magnetic pole and the rotational pole are somewhat independent. Rotational pole shifting would effect temperatures, but magnetic pole shifting would not. Magnetic pole shifting simply changes where a compass will point and may effect auroras, but I do not see how that would effect temperatures.

  • i never really understood why someone (al gore) who says he believes the ocean lvls are gonna rise 20 feet bought beach front property in california in 2010?

  • @Pat9201 Well, in his lifetime it'll be all good. But it won't be a great property for his grand-grand children.

    Good comment. Thanks!

  • @ILYIAB you never know what turn the earths natural cycle will take far in the future but i suspect it'll be fine.

  • @Pat9201 Me too. But it may not be good for us. ;-)

  • You guys are silly. With all those wind farms, blowing nice cool wind all over the planet, how can we be warming? I run my 6000 watt freezer day and night just so i can dump buckets and buckets of ice into my local ocean. Surely im helping to cool down the planet?

    Now that is science. ;o)

  • @kaderoder Now that's how to do it! :-)

  • @kaderoder the wind farms don't blow wind, they convert wind to electricity. the freezer uses power generated by a power plant which releases co2 to warm the planet.

  • @IlersichProductions Thanks Nerd.

  • Anyone with a decent intellect that spends 10 minutse of their time researching the Maunder minimum will realise the absolute ignorant rubbish than represents the foundation of "Global Warming:". This crap needs to be exluded from schools on pain of death. You green reds are the absolute trash of modern society. I would give up democracy in a flash to see you climate fascists in a camp.

  • @Alucia1 Cool! Love you comment. Can you write a peer reviewed article about it? Or do we have to go to Australia to .....

    Spend 10 min on what the rest of humanity has... called a conscience ... and become part .. of..homo sapiens sapiens

    You are welcome!

  • @Alucia1 And if you spend 10 min on Google looking for real research papers, you would know why you are the excrement.

  • smog kills. and we eat polluted food, yet people are still more worried about co2. all i can say about global warming is, maybe you shouldn't build cities 1 meter above sea level!

  • @danthemanzizzle If you learn to write, some one may care and/or notice. Anyway, thanks for your comment!

  • Take the Hockey Stick Graph for example. Made by Global Warming enthusiasts but it was a lie. Made to look as if this was the only time the Climate was changing. They left out the medieval warming and another. Its all a load of bullshit.

  • Can't believe these people believe in Global Warming! Did you know Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, and neptune are also having "Global Warming"? What, are there cars in those planets, too?

  • @Scarh1fiend345 your sources?

  • @IlersichProductions You can find it in MANY books and websites.

  • @Scarh1fiend345 you still haven't specified any.

  • @Scarh1fiend345 ya,im sure it has nothing to do with that huge thing we like to call "THE SUN!!!"..LOL

  • @Pat9201 Provide a legitimate source saying our Sun is the problem.

  • @ILYIAB more legitimate than al gore?man made global warming is just a scam,much like global cooling 30 years ago.

  • @Pat9201 And your source for "global cooling 30 years ago" is?

  • @ILYIAB a 30 year old newspaper...lol

  • Funny....warmers are now saying 'well even if man caused warming is not totally accurate" we should "still allow government totally control our lives" just as if nothing has changed since email-gate. Like lambs to the slaughter progressive liberals dont understand the concept of liberty and are being fooled by the political power elite...including the UN.

  • @banbabes111 Perhaps. But it still has not been established by empirical science that CO2 is having any discernible effect on global temperatures, much less that whatever miniscule effect it might be having would be deleterious. On the contrary we should expect it to enhance the net-productivity of the biosphere by providing vital nutrition to green plants and microorganisms. Also to act in that way is reckless and more dangerous than keeping still until proper clarity has been attained.

  • Ok, lets see if it is true. All the smart guys that say global warming is true. We put a bank account with tons of money in it. We tell these guys if you are right you don't get a nickel of the money. But you do all the work for nothing. When they learn that they can't make any money, theri claims of clobal warming will fall apart. These guys are smart poot guys that want to make money.

  • the earth has been through alot more shit than use alright?

    this is all a plan to destabilize third world countries and fufill the new world order.

  • lol people that say that global warming is fake probably pollut the earth everyday and cant admit that they are ruining earth!

  • Nice video, but you should probably pick a new title....

  • @redriverhautbois I want the idiot deniers to find this vid. That's why I chose the name. :-)

    Thanks for your post.

  • I am not well informed, niether am I what many people would say well educated. But I know one thing, IT IS EASIER TO BE BE A PART OF WHAT EVERYBODY IS DOING AND SAYING EVEN WHEN IT MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE TRUE, THAN IT IS TO BE IN THE MINORITY EVEN WHEN WHAT THEY ARE SAYING MAY BE WELL WORTH OUR CONSIDERATION. Thank you for posting such videos.

  • @ILYIAB you are a fucking idiot.

    Seriously you must be brainwashed. Simply put, your'e a greeny fuck.

  • @JayBoy277 brainwashed?

    even if he is an idiot, that would be taking away his free will. Illegal? Cruel?

    and what makes him an idiot?

  • well, is cap and trade politics? You support it right? IYLIAB? So "GW" isn't politics? Really? So Earthquakes are old too?? GW isn't politics?!?!? Is that all you got? When society comes and hits me??!? So society in some way "hits" people.. People do it to themselves. Unless they live in the inner-city and the GOVERNMENT forces public schooling on them which is worthless.. "the natural order is for government to grow and freedom to yield.". Thomas Jefferson.... Isnt cap and trade govt?

  • Global Freezing

    2010 Scotland’s coldest winter since 1914

    The average temperatures in January and December were the coldest in Scotland since 1914 - the year that data was first logged.

  • @Dayversion And your point is?

    Extremes are a predicted result of GW.

  • @ILYIAB LOL, that's why the wordsmiths changed it to "Climate Change" from Anthropogenic Global Warming to many records lows and colds, the people would not buy AGW, so they changed it. Too funny, if its warm or hot, its global warming, if its cool or cold its climate change. Climate change has happened, is happening and will happen as long as the earth exists.

    With Al Fraud as the face of Global Warming, it was a dead horse right from the gate.

  • @Dayversion Let's see if you understand basic physics. You never made it to high-school, did you?

    GW means we get more water in the air (evaporation). More energy is added to our planetary system. More energy = powerful storms, extreme clashed between hot and cold.

    Get it? Or should I start back with 1+1=2.

    The extremes are evidence of GW. Both cold and warm. Get it?

    Local data is useless by itself you nut. It's called "Global" for a reason. What was the temp in California yesterday?

  • @ILYIAB So then it should be called "Global Cooling and Global Warming" by what you just said. LOl, get it?

  • @Dayversion So you agree that what is called GW is correct but you don't like the label? Is that correct?

  • @ILYIAB I like how you put it "Both cold and warm. Get it?' LOL, yeah i get it, its global warming when its warm and global cooling when its cool. We have that already there called the seasons. But I do ty for your explaination, was a classic.

  • @Dayversion So you didn't understand the physics? Is that it?

  • @Dayversion How do you go on justifying for government to impose itself on you.. Can you not take care of yourself? .... The Earth is pretty old... The human race is a blip on its radar.. And at some point the human race will be gone.. I'd rather the human race die free then die cus government couldn't take care of all of us... get it? Politicizing weather.... really? you ever thought how wind happens?.. the smartest person in the world can't make a fan big enough.. Sounds simple but it's true

  • @47thedude You need to direct your post to the proper person.

  • @Dayversion sorry.. clicked on the wrong box.. I'm not a youtube lifer

  • @47thedude Sure. Earthquakes are also old. No help for you from society when it hits you. GW is not politics. It's real. But don't worry. We'll let you drown first. Does that make you happy?

  • @ILYIAB Oh, Mars' Ice Cap is melting too, if you didn't know. Are there cars there, too? Also, Jupiter is also facing the same problem, it's aptmosphere has increased 10 degrees, also, are there factories there? It's a cycle in the Solar System where the Sun increases it's heat Radiation, because if you didn't know, ever since 1980 the number of sun spots on the Sun has decreased considerably compared to 2000. Even the Sun's surface temperature has increased.

  • @ILYIAB Oh, and the top 200 Scientists in the world can tell you GW is a hoax to get more money. I am 13 and I know this.

  • @47thedude Blips on radar can lead to total destruction. I thought Pearl Harbour taught you that.

    It doesn't take brains just to make things big, genius. The smartest person in the world would probably decide they had better things to do than make big fans.

  • Obviously the film was less than perfect. The producers made changes. Contrast that with Al Gore's movie which also contains many inaccuracies. Have there been changes ? I don't know.  Just asking.

  • @jscottupton Agreed. And I don't know.

    It doesn't change reality.

    Thanks for your comment.

  • so is the holocost my freind...

  • @diapysik What?

  • Nice video. I'm so tired of these deniers and their bullshit. No one in the scientific community except their fellow denier friends thinks they have anything worth mentioning! THOSE are the lies. Global warming IS real. Now, it may not cause a global catastrophe, but there are at least minimal observable consequences, and the data DOES show that at least a good portion of it these days is caused by man! come on, deniers. You really think we could use so much CO2 and have no effect?

  • The greenhouse effect DOES EXIST! It happens even on Venus, where there are absolutely ZERO humans whatsoever. The CO2 traps more heat. I mean, this is basic fucking 6th grade science, for christ sake. And yet you guys are on the denial side are totally denying it simply for your political purposes.

    I'm sure there are liars on the global warming side as well, but they are a lot fewer than you've claimed, trust me. There is REAL research in support of this. Stop with the nonsense.

  • @whoo689 I mean, almost every fucking denier argument can be easily debunked by REAL experts who are in it for the science, not members of some politically biased group or think tank.

  • @whoo689 And btw, the fucking HOCKEY STICK GRAPH has NOT been "debunked"! It's only been "debunked" by a handful of so-called climate change skeptics usually with a political agenda. All the sites that say it's "debunked" are usually right-wing or anti-climate change groups with right-wing ties. It's so obvious!

    Look, I'm a skeptic but a REAL skeptic. I don't accept anything without proof or evidence, but I don't DENY shit that's proven either b/c it doesn't fit my worldview.

  • The so-called "climate change skeptics" make a mockery of that word. 

  • I mean, when are guys like Senator Inhofe just going to ADMIT that there is at least some man-made warming out there? I don't know just how much we contribute, but we contribute at least a good portion. How can anyone say with a straight face our contribution of CO2, ever since the BEGINNING of the Industrial Revolution, at least, makes no dent in warming?? That's laughable. It is enough for actual scientists who have done massive amounts of research to be concerned.

  • @whoo689 We don't produce enough to actually harm the ozone because THE TREES BREATHE IT ALL. Hello? Have you been paying attention in Biology class?? Plus, there's no actual evidence in the first place. It's just cherry-picked info from bad sources, and there is NO real threat concerning our Co2 releases. Please, check your sources again, and again, and again, until it's CONFIRMED,

  • @SylphViper LOL! I guess that you, as 17 year old artist has more info than the collected body of work done by actual scientists. Funny.

  • @ILYIAB Huh. Does my age matter? Do my hobbies matter? I've done my research, unlike YOU. This "body of scientists" is just a label. The data they've provided is FALSE. I would suggest you keep researching the FACTS instead of believing everything the media likes to tell you. You've made a fool out of yourself; I hope you're proud.

  • @SylphViper I would suggest that you do a little research and read Nature, Science, BAMS, etc. and you will find very quickly that your previous research (on the internet?) is unreliable at best. As a research scientist I have done the research and global warming is happening, it is not natural (e.g., the Sun) and it is becoming a major threat to our way of life.

  • @drkstrong I didn't say that Global Warming isn't happening; I'm saying that it's not happening for the reasons the media likes to tell us. Co2? That's not the cause. Not even close. The data provided on that was completely unreliable. Global Warming IS happening, but not because of pollution. It's a heating phase on the Sun, nothing more. Other planets are heating up too, and it is NOT coincidence. Don't believe me? Look it up!!

  • @SylphViper Who said anything about the media? I am talking about the research papers. The Sun has been dropping in activity over the last 50 years (look it up - suggest SIDC smoothed sunspot number). Other planets are not ALL warming up and those that MAY BE are not doing it because of the Sun. Mars - dust storms. Pluto seasonal changes. They would all have to warm at the same rate at the same time that is not happening. There is a perfectly plausible explanation why the earth has warmed - AGW.

  • @SylphViper First of all, notice how we ALSO cut down all our trees and rest of the plants?

    But what I really wanna say is, why take the chance? And even better is; in almost every situation it's much cheaper to be envioument friendly, such as renewable energy, which we'll need sooner or later anyway. Saving electricity, water and so on, will also make everyday life much cheaper. Plus this will also help us keeping general pollution down!

  • @BlackDeltorDelore HOLY CRAP why is that you "green" people assume automatically that people who disagree with the media are anti-earth?!?! I AM ON THE SAME SIDE AS YOU. We are charged with protecting and maintaining this world we live on because it's our HOME. I'm just saying that if the sun changes it's heating phase, it's OUT OF OUR HANDS. However, cleaning up our crap out of the oceans and protecting our wildlife is something we should be doing AUTOMATICALLY. sheesh

  • @SylphViper Well it's good too see that we agree! =)

    But then I don't see the problem, if it's (not) global warming, green house gasses, or whatever, we should just try and be "green" anyway. =)

  • Ah common sense and logic would seem to dictate that carbon emissions are doing damage. I live in Ireland. When humans moved to Ireland they cut down trees (Trees convert CO2 to O2) Since we didnt have trees that CO2 was stored in bogs as peat. Now we have dug up all of the bog and burned releasing CO2. Surely that cant be good.

    The sun is at its lowest activity since 1850, when a mini ice age occurred in Europe. The thames in london froze. So its obvious that the sun is not the only factor.

  • one of the wankers you use in your video, Stephen Schneider, was warning everyone in the 1970s that the earth was cooling, and we were heading for another ice age

  • @mikesomething yes and that certainly WAS the case when i was in school only about 5 years ago...and suddenly they tell us "nah, ya know what, the earth is gonna heat up due to human carbon use and we all gonna bake and die" only a fool would believe such BULLSHIT.

  • @BDoran1988 Thanks for your comment. What ever it was supposed to be... :-)

  • @ILYIAB and looking further at more of our comments i see that you ARE one of those losers that tries to use peoples age to look down on them, just because you are older? you spent most of your life as a JEHOVAH WITNESS and now you are some born again atheist. you are the one who is messed up so stop trying to bring everyone down to your level you sad piece of shit. Ive met plenty like you before....

  • @BDoran1988 Awhhh... Did someone hurt your feelings...

    Now I'll address your arguments. Wait. You didn't make any.

    LOLZ!

  • @mikesomething It's not my video. Can't you read? Provide references when you make claims or STFU!

  • @mikesomething Source?

  • @ILYIAB check his name out, hes very outspoken, google it, you will find it in seconds STEPHEN SCHNEIDER

  • @mikesomething I did! Numbnuts!

    I want the source where he says what you say he said. Got it!

  • @mikesomething But most of the scientist did not believe him and they were right. Even back then if you look at the literature there are about 5 papers about global warming for everyone about imminent ice ages.

  • thank you! is this your own video and research?

  • @6u6u7o Thanks for your comment.

    No it's not my vid. I mirror it from greenman (see more in the description box.)

    Have a great day!

  • al gore is a stupid asshole. a child could see through him and its a shame that he is trying to corrupt childrens minds with his "inconvienient bullshit" in classrooms without them having a say. climate will always change,get over it and FUCKING ADAPT

  • @BDoran1988 I think a child, with 2 or 3 years of education could write a better/proper sentence than you. Way to go DORAN! LOLZ!

  • @ILYIAB so it looks like you have been roped into it too then? what a friggin shame. and what sort of a fag uses LOLZ?? come on.... you just make yourself look like an idiot...and probably one that resorts to correcting peoples spelling and grammar or whatever like many of the dousches here, cuz ya havent got anything else to say.so go fuck yourself

  • @BDoran1988 You don't like LOLZ. I get that. What's your evidence against the arguments made? Source plz.

    Wait for it..... LOLZ!

  • Science FTW!

  • if global warming isnt real, then al gore isnt the only person that is wrong!!!!

  • the suns poles will shift!

    thats why!

  • The earth gets hotter and colder naturally. Ice ages???? ring a bell??? God Al Gore is such a fucking retard.

  • @rarimagiraffe Yes that's right. But that's not the question is it.

    Please provide a peer-reviewed scientific article to back up your claim that hasn't been debunked.

    Now go and stick your head in the sand giraffe. ;-)

  • @ILYIAB (200-500ft or meters cant remember) but he has a nice house ocean side may i add in San Francisco...he knows its a load of crap..he is doing this to push for the carbon tax and when they do all the fucking assholes that were saying global warming exist will die with the rest of us and what will they have to say....oooops sorry..thats not going to cut it

  • @rarimagiraffe you are absolutely correct, its called FLUCTUATION, it may go up a little then down a little, BUT IT IS CERTAINLY NO BIG DEAL. how can people be so gullible? its beyond me....

  • its not because of CO2 its the sun ppl

  • @rafa40314 And your source for this claim is????

  • This proved