Hi take a look at my videos.Comment if you like i won't cry.1. Question" What has Nigel Benn and me have in common "? Answer."We both held the L/Middle weight champion in the army" Nigel held it in 1983 I held it in 1986,1985 I was the welterweight Champion.1979 was the L/welterweight champion in the Marines indiviuals.
I don't see how RockDoc50 claims this (and the Part 1 video) are inaccurate. Give some examples. This guy is providing anecdotal episodes - how is that inaccurate? - where certain practices are disclosed. Maybe this is biased but it is based on experience, so the caveat is self-evident. Then again, that suggests that everyone's experiences are biased in some fashion, which pretty much goes without saying.
This is totally biased and inaccurate anti-pharma propoganda. Both of these two individuals stand to benefit financially and professionally by bashing the pharmaceutical industry.
Thank you, I think another way to describe this would be, The evolution of bad science lies and being blind to oneself while looking for profits and expanding,
If the exapantion of those big Pharma companies would go as it is it would mean 50% of the public under pills by the year 2020, That would be the end of society, People plz start moving to natural solutions, not patented one, This will bring those lies down, There should be more supervision on products from nature, quality,user manuals!
Hi take a look at my videos.Comment if you like i won't cry.1. Question" What has Nigel Benn and me have in common "? Answer."We both held the L/Middle weight champion in the army" Nigel held it in 1983 I held it in 1986,1985 I was the welterweight Champion.1979 was the L/welterweight champion in the Marines indiviuals.
philcoool 10 months ago
I don't see how RockDoc50 claims this (and the Part 1 video) are inaccurate. Give some examples. This guy is providing anecdotal episodes - how is that inaccurate? - where certain practices are disclosed. Maybe this is biased but it is based on experience, so the caveat is self-evident. Then again, that suggests that everyone's experiences are biased in some fashion, which pretty much goes without saying.
cqr80 1 year ago
Taking on the pharmaceutical industry is not an advisable strategy to make a profit, and certainly not as lucrative as working FOR the drug industry!
stanmrak68 1 year ago
RockDoc is wrong! Pharma is "ALL ABOUT THE MONEY". They care nothing about negative side effects and long term damage from over prescribing.
eeeeeegadd 1 year ago
This is totally biased and inaccurate anti-pharma propoganda. Both of these two individuals stand to benefit financially and professionally by bashing the pharmaceutical industry.
RockDoc50 1 year ago
500 billion a year is alot of money,
Rise Rise Omega Supreme and kick those decepticans asses, Hurt them where it hearts their pockets.
telewebservices 3 years ago
Thank you, I think another way to describe this would be, The evolution of bad science lies and being blind to oneself while looking for profits and expanding,
If the exapantion of those big Pharma companies would go as it is it would mean 50% of the public under pills by the year 2020, That would be the end of society, People plz start moving to natural solutions, not patented one, This will bring those lies down, There should be more supervision on products from nature, quality,user manuals!
telewebservices 3 years ago