Added: 4 years ago
From: eu86cj
Views: 217,300
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (214)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • all tanks are destroyed by neutron bombs. period

  • My father was a combat Marine in the south pacific in WWII. He told me he saw sherman tanks blown hundreds of feet in the air. These were 30+ ton machines. He served part duty as a radio operator in a Sherman. Can you imagine seeing that and staying in your tank? 3rd Amphib., 1st Marines. Combat at Okinawa and Guam. Semper Fi dad.

  • @1965cyclone39 I bet you're dad had some great stories to tell about his time god bless him for fighting for our freedoms.

  • so why was that abrams ruined?.......if its so tough?

  • @jeepers2655 If you have enough explosives any tank can be blown to small pieces.

  • @jeepers2655 Most of these destroyed Abrams were only disabled meaning they lost a track or engine failure. In order to keep them from falling into enemy hands the tanks we destroyed by shooting them point blank with other M1's. Reports say that at times the shots would bounce off even at point blank range.

  • @zeek997733 yeah rite...... even merkava get their ass kicked off...why not admitting m1's also full of shit,nothing in this world last forever not even america nor russia..when ur times up it's up buddy

  • @danisha861027 Considering the Merkeva went up against high tech Russian Anti-Tank missiles, they were in fact destroyed at the hands of the enemy. The Abrams hasn't been tested by this yet and not one was destroyed at the hands of the enemy yet. The Mekeva is better but it did go up against odds that weren't in its favor.

  • @zeek997733 then lets hope god will favor us with that odd Abram againts some Russian build AT weapon...oh i wish chalengger too then it will complete the circumstances.by the way dude over is 5.40 pm and a good time for a cup of tea.. i am from malaysia and you?

  • @zeek997733 ummm quite a few m1 Abrams have been lost to IEDs and large anti tank weapons in Iraq, do some research before you type!

  • @ProjectRealityBf2 none to anti-tank weapons only a few to ieds nut none to designate anti tank rockets

  • are there dead people inside those tanks?

  • There was an M1A2 abrams tank that took 76 RPG-7 hits 4 IED's and 5 direct mortar hits and rolled right out with minimal damage to the engine and internal systems. The abrams is the toughest tank out there and without a governer to limit its speed can go 70 miles per hour LOL

  • They were made at the Lima Army Tank Plant in Lima, Ohio and at the Detroit Arsenal Tank Plant in Warren, Michigan. Current production is underway only at the Lima plant.

  • and NO the M1 is not built in China. they are built in Detroit Mi.  by general dynamics...

  • Actually i believe that South koera uses a version of the M1 but with out the special armor or the computer system

  • USA....and this music....SUCK!!!!!!

  • America terrorist #1

  • M1 Abrams is designed and produced in China,and since 2008 in US under permission and supervision of Chinese technician,this video prove that tank is worthless,Iraqi fighters for freedom with RPG 32 destroyed them on hundreds,today wreckage of this tanks Iraqi peasants use to built field lavatory's.

  • @neon187211 bring the fuckin tank back to America. the Chinese cant build shit

  • @thunderhorse64 Trust the China,they are doing the job well !

  • @neon187211

    Ummm....there is no out sourcing of American military equipment production to any foreign country, ESPECIALLY not China. Do you know how top secret the Abrams is? They have not been destroyed by the hundreds, thats BS. There have been few accounts of Abrams being destroyed by the enemy (like, under 10). Disabled? Sure, but not destroyed. Tank crew survivability is high, quite high. 90% of the cases, tanks were destroyed by the Americans, after being disabled by the enemy.

  • @m1up and then even the dead ones get reborn.i think to this day not one has been utterly wiped out by E.A,just fucked up a bit,and ya gotta thank us brits for the Chobham Armour and the Germans for the gun.and i think its only the chobham is secret, its a mix of metal and ceramic honeycomb

  • @damafia29

    Exactly. Modern tanks are almost invincible to any kind of weaponry that infantry can carry (i know, its not true but they stand up very, very, very well against RPG/IED and things like that).

  • @m1up even anti tank mines might just take out the tracks and give said crew a big headache(in more ways than one) and thats a big big pop

  • @damafia29

    Yeah for sure. Its just amazing how well built modern MBT's are! I would rather have a bad headache than to be blown apart and die. Oh, and the Leopard 2a6m is mine protected and has suspended seats so the crew wont even get the headache! LOL!

  • the name of the song please

  • @blixtkrig Lets Go (Single Edit) - Paul Van Dyk.. itswritten ^^^^^^

  • If America wants to get the glory of the world's evil. it ends badly.

  • Why are so few photos of wrecked Iraqi tanks. all over the internet the same photo a couple of Iraqi tanks, but it is full of photos of wrecked tanks USA?

  • @Biogem369 Because sadly most of the world hates America...

  • @TheRazorbackpilot Wrong! mankind love America!

    People want to see America a good country

    And America wants to get the laurels of the Soviet Union.

    All the annoying habits the U.S. military.

  • @Biogem369 I see you're trying to be sarcastic. Good job.

  • @TheRazorbackpilot I am far from your understanding of sarcasm.

  • @Biogem369 I see you're just trying to what? Get me angry? Not going to work.

  • @TheRazorbackpilot not fig did not understand?? I have a problem with English, but you have a problem with your head!

  • no leopards...

  • Paul van Dyk - Let Go

  • there are mostly russian tanks which are destroyed like the t-54/55 or others

  • M1 Abrams is created and completely produced in China,and since 2008 produced in US under the license and supervision of China's technicians,according the China's military experts Abrams is a"significant piece of junk ".

  • Tanks sure seem like a waste of money to me. Destroyed in seconds by any number of surface or air missles

  • @ab3273

    tanks is a waste of money??

    how about wars.. think.. how many ppl has died at war.. wat did u got when win war?? money .. is tht it?? does money can replace ppl who was died? no!! the war shud stop!

  • Tanks iraq 1955 of creation and 1995-М1!!. America does not sell the modern weapon on the east and you think Russion sells? Then you noob? Excuse

  • @MegaPypkin America sells and has sold some modern equiptment, including F-16s and abrams to Iraq and Egypt.

  • Its crazy to see what shells or rockets can do to all this metal and armor :| .

  • a lot of russian scrap with a sprinkling of german

    and a hint of US

  • hmm first time i see an abrams al fucked up

  • 0:46 - M-84 Jugoslav tank. It was destroy in 10 days war in Slovenia, near Komenda, close airport. It was not hit, but it was broken. Latter was burn by civilian people and it was exploded. I still remember the explosion of that tank and have a small part of it, just for memories to that crasy time!

  • was that last one an american infantry fighting vehicle? or was the flag only placed on it as an act of victory? one thing is for sure. you would never want to be in or around a tank/armor of any kind when it gets hit. it becomes an iron coffin. its disgusting. fucking insanity. war should never be neccessary. i think wars are manipulated to happen. 10,000 years of war? wtf is going on here on Earth?

  • @3ApaBcTByNTe last picture was an american lav-25 which was destroyed by friendly fire.

  • hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    dont forget we facked us army every day

    hhhhhhhhh

  • The iraq inavtion 2003, was just a walk for the US army, you know why? The iraqi people was tierd on saddams dictaitorship, they tried to get rid of saddam, but the US led allis let him massecer the revolt 1991. Iraq fought 8 years konstant war with Iran. Inavded kuwait and was a target of UN sanctions for 15 years the allied bombed targets in iraq until 2003.

  • @ModerSverige aye and do you think a country with more then 15 years of constant breaking of UN resolutions - not leading to sanctions, wonder why - does not emrit a tanking? Im talkin about Israel. Iraq war was built on a lie. Dont even act like u care what the Iraqis wanted. If thats the case then the Palestinians are sick of the zionists persecuting them. Get an education mate. WAKE UP.

  • @makaveliinthis786

    CAN YOU PLEASE SHUT THE FUCK UP MAN, I LIVED THIS WAR, I HAVE SEEN IT IN MY EYES, AND I KNOW BETTER THEN A FUCKHEAD LIKE YOU. YOU THINK YOU KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT THE MIDDLE EAST? NO MATE SHOVE THE PARDEN IN YOUR ASS

  • hahaha srbija!!!!lol the flag painted on the tank...go up against serbs and u die even old civilian granies would probably start throwing grenades at enemy soldiers

  • life of crew?

  • I think Iraq didn't start the war against you, you started the war against them to take revenge for 9/11. But you fund no weapons of mass destruction as Bush said in his interview!

  • You had the advatange of 21 century technology, nobody is denying that. You fought against bunch of guys with ak47 and the most modern equipment was bad copy of T72.... so you shoud shove your macho attitude down ure ass. Your govt didnt dare send troops on the ground in Kosovo because thre were 180 000 to the teeth armed Serbs who were battle tested in 3 wars, so they send albaninas who got slaughtered. Again you will never truely hold iraq.

  • @reddwarf50

    agreed

  • haha!

    God bless America, they'll need it^^

  • Sorry but the Bradley at the end is not a tank. Neither is the FLAK gun near the middle...

  • All tanks are not American Tanks !

    The German Panther Mark 5 and other tanks!

  • @BismarckundTirpitz

    0:25-0:30 M1A1 Abrams.

    There were mainly Russian after WW-2 Tanks.

    Only 2 Panther. And what u mean with Mark 5?

  • what that´s, historicaly absurdity

  • Comment removed

  • so ein bull shit ales andere als us tank russian germany und china.... muhaaaa

  • @leuchen75 was meinst du da sind doch paar zerstöre US Panzer!

  • at 27 abrams 52 57 1.03 t 72 1.38 panther of ww2 2.22 british fighter 1.52 t 62 and at 1.58 a bmp apc.RIP and dimmer07 they are not russian ther are iraqi t 72s and t 62 and bmps lol. and ollitheawsome they arnt metal boxes imagine if they werent in the tank and they werent made imagine how gruesome the deaths would of been. m1a2 abrams tortured iraqi tanks the t series 55 62 72 80 96 and the bmp series bmp 1 2 3.if you think im lying type in either one in googl image RIP oh yh gr8 vid subscribe

  • Nice video, song pls ??

  • Too bad its only a very few - i realy like the way 5000 tanks and armor vechiles were destroyed in hours - Now thats satisfying

  • NICE man

  • Hell from Above

  • i like to see your mom naked... makes Me feel satisfied! hahahahaha

  • Imagine how much People died in those metall Boxes. R.I.P

  • most of them were made by russian

  • Yeah..but operated by a bunch of ragheads.

  • No wonder they were destroyed so easily.

  • yeah this video isn't at all disrespectfull to all the dead tank crews (sarcasm)

  • good vid, shame about the music, best watched on mute.

  • is there any other kind of tank there isnt a civilian version so its just a tank line calling a humvee a army hummer

  • You can buy old tanks... i dont think they have a firing pin though..

  • ur also talking about ~$200,000 on average.. =/

  • i was just saying you said army tank and i was saying is there a cicilian tank so its just a tank thats all the humvee was just a comperrisen

  • Oh my bad. It sounds like i joined the middle of a convo. I never talked to you before so...

    yeah. hah but anyway, now we have some info about tanks though!! haha so thats cool

  • well ive seen drivable t-54/55s with their guns deactivadet going for 30-50k euros,t-34s for 30-40ks we have some drivable t-34s,t-55s and one sherman in private use. ww2 german tanks are on other price range then, when our army sold old sturmgeshutz 3s which had been in firing ranges for +120k euros.

  • Tank crew are more important to save than the tank... Damage tank can always be restored or replace but the life of her crew are not... It dsn't matter if the tank is distroyed the important thing is her crew must survive.

  • @jafalks hahahaha you are funny mate in a Battle field most important thing is to win and kill the enemy at any cost No one cares if the crew lives or die tank has to do its JOB

    I mean think about it If they really want to save lives why go on war to begin with

    War means death of Thousands

  • @USMANchampNO1 If you think it that way then the Russian tanks are way more cost-effective than western tanks, it has gun that is capable of taking out other tanks,it has armour thick enough to rebel most or atleast some anti-tank weapons and they cost lot less then western tanks. example t-90 $1.5 milj abrams near 6?

  • @SuperFinnish Oh i know that man

    Russian and China chose quantity over quality

    There things are not as good as Americans

    But they are 3 times cheaper than Americans

  • @SuperFinnish comparing russian and western armor is 2 totally different mindsets. Russians perfer less complicated and simple to use weapons the West uses complex tech. West favors crew comfort and survial. Russians dont consider it a priority. Remember it takes a week to make a tank it takes 18 years to raise and train a solder. Also the russians cannot rely on their numbers anymore.<china can still ..most western tanks are much harder to kill also

  • @RJF1966 dude, things has changed, russia isnt sovjet no more and that kind of thinking isnt muhc in the russian mind no more. Besides, they also got some high tech advanced tanks and fighters now days.

  • @gorgonzo1a im aware things have changed that does not lession the fact that russia is still 10 years behind in the high tech advances. It is a gap that would take a decade to overcome..im also aware there are areas where Russia is more advanced like Melalurgy and some areas in physics.

  • @RJF1966 Russia has a shit economy, we can all agree to that. However they do hold some of the most technologically superior weapons systems in the world, regardless whether it be domestic or foreign investments. Russian old small arms, anti-tank systems already hold the title. Their latest tanks, air-defence systems and others have yet to be proven. Russia is not ten years behind, if anything its tens years beyond with its shitty economy.

    America just purchased 21 Russian transport choppers.

  • @KingAzmr well as i said some areas russia is ahead..not in Small arms or anti tank weapons.. they sell those on the arms market..very few of russian tech is even to the west. The Small arms is equ9il you forget one thing.. when a nation is judged its on its assets, average national per captia and the biggest average life style.. russia is a bannana republic period.. Moscow is the only city on somewhat of a even par..to any western nation thats it. America on one knee is still way above russia

  • @KingAzmr oh damm i miss read your post im sorry :) unlike most people i admit when im wrong

  • @RJF1966 So true ! I was on Challenger British tank crews in gulf war91 and based in Berlin during the cold war 87-90. Classrooms in Berlin taught us Russian tactics was to swarm the enemy with numbers as they did with great succes in ww2 ! On inspection of Russian hardware we destroyed in 91 that the Iraqs used we realised it was very simple, light armoured and quite primitive ie very easy to knock out with DU ! Although with 50 MBTS in a battle group faceing 200 you still have work to do .

  • @jafalks

    To create tanks you needs money, factory, workers, and time.

    To conscript new crews you just need to give an order

  • @Scoutrussp7 But training tank crews to operate the tank takes time, and if your on a war against atleast equal enemy or on defence you dont have the time.

  • @jafalks It's not always true. For poor, desolated countries, tanks are harder to replace than crews.

  • @ all destroyed russian tanks- Abrahms and Challenger were here. XD

  • its not russian army tanks moran....

    its imported versions

  • Most of them were of Russian origin. I loved to shoot at the piece of shit Russian equipment during the gulf war and laugh at the inept Soviet equipment. Oh by the way, FUCK Russia.

  • what I can say?

    your mother sucks dicks of a goat

    and your father is a bum)))

    shut up bastard,freshly slated cunt.

  • Ohh attack my parents what a clever come back. Hah!

  • go fuck yourself Fellatrix.

  • Hah!

  • nothing to say dumb? just hah?

  • I could accuse your parents of being goat fuckers and bums and call you a freshly slated cunt, but that doesn't seem quite mature. When you have a comeback that doesn't make you sound like a douch bag, give it a try.

  • я твой дом труба шатал))))

    so try to interpret cowboy

  • Since your pig language is not something I have wasted my time learning, I will assume it says you like to masturbate to pictures of Stalin.

  • whats your nathionality?

    american? there is no american nation?

    your language is english not american....

    your fuckin country doesen't have calture

    so kiss my dick-head wanker)))

  • I don't care what you think of The United States of America. If you mattered, I might, but you don't. Culture, not calture. Doesn't not doesen't. Nationality, not nathionality. You have been schooled boy.

  • i've rolled your cowboy hat on my dick)))

  • @BlackhorseFulda hey yank its colour not color....they've got a point mind there appears to be a lot of yank bashing going on on this site . Maybe its because others see both sides and not the US side of things . Just a thought yank .

  • You are really smart. In the United States it's spelled color. See the side you want. They attacked us. I'm not here to get into politics. I was just messing with the other kid did not know what he was talking about in reference to tanks. I

  • Cheers yank thanks for that old boy , notice superior tactics . Well yes in part but its because we had more advanced equipment and redwarf50 makes a point most of the Iraqis were not professional like the British army therefore it was a stroll in the park . The Soviet equipment was old out of date they also had weeks if not months to prepare but Saddam put in conscripts in the front line as he didnt want to sacrifice his Republican Guard . I was there also .

  • It's good that there are people who are willing to admit to reality. Usualy those who boast and refuse to recognise the reality eventually smash their head in a wall. Iraqies feared Saddam more then they feared NATO, and most of those tanks up to 70% were abandoned and destoryed from a distance of 20-30km.

  • @BlackhorseFulda,yes you may spell it color rather than colour but why refer to the language you speak as English?It really makes no sense,but then again you are people who left the continent due to persecution,pilgrims I believe,glad you weirdos left to be honest so I suppose the word color as well as tire is a small price to pay,the only thing that we have is a common language(regardless of dialect)but we also share language with former colonies it doesnt mean we are similar in any other way

  • @BlackhorseFulda You shot at poor trained enemy and old and "import" grade equipment. That's what your army is good at doing winning wars against 3rd world countries, and yet you still manage to get your ass kicked.

  • I'm well aware of the import grade weapons they used. When you go to war and see what it's like then make a comment. We are not getting our asses kicked. The Republican guard was not poorly trained. They just got defeated by superior tactics and equipment. Get over the fact that Soviet equipment was defeated cry baby.

  • @BlackhorseFulda First iraq army was poorly trained, with old soviet equipment from 60-70's. Second they feared sadam more then they feared you. Third moral was very low they had to chose to die for the country lead by a dictator who didn't giva a damn about their lives, or get killed by another invader dicatator (USA). They chose third option to abandon the war. Looks like a sane choice.Alot of irqies surrendered just because of this not because of ure superior tactics.

  • @reddwarf50

    Afraid of Saddam? Any Iraqi, except the most retarded Islamic fanatics, who knew a bit of what was going on politically and economically will tell you no one developed Iraq like Saddam did.

    The Iraqis just came out of an 8 year war fighting against Iranian jihad. You think they wanted to fight anymore? This is why US invaded then, when the Iraqis were very war-weary. Fucking Nazis.

  • @GoldenZealot21 I know that Saddam developed Iraq more then any other leader before him. A friend of mine who is a mechanical engineer was working in Iraq in 80s and he said that people who got married got a new car on the behalf of the state... he said that there was a massive potential and that iraq was a very rich country and could be made into a marvel. Politics took it the other way though.

  • @reddwarf50

    Yeah, American politics... corporate Imperialism... Israeli paranoia. If Iraq had a population of say 80 million in 1990 and not 18 million, and hadn't just come out of an 8-year war with Iran, it wouldn't have been invaded. 20 more years of rapid growth rather than 20 years of more devastation than any country has experienced in the modern era? Oh dang, it would easily be better than Israel today. Iraq was a decent country back then.

  • @reddwarf50

    Now it's like Egypt or other countries Iraqis would joke about, or that Iraq would give some welfare too. It's very sad. And no American even realizes what has been done, all for fucking oil we haven't even gotten (credit to the resistance).

    I know for a fact you can't be American. What you say is considered near blasphemy here.

  • heh, if there comes a 3rd gulf war then itl be abrams vs abrams. :P

  • @mannecia no itll be hellfire missile from drone versus abrams

  • music from a band called the beloved from the uk,cool.

  • Nice photos.......shitty music.

  • there sure are a lot of T55's in this vid

  • will iraqi government allow texans to recover them tanks for personal entertainment?

  • What`s the song name ?

  • do you know, what kind of armor is the one with serbia flag and emblem ?? i dont recognize it

  • i assume its t-54/55

  • It looks like an American m-113 APC but I dont think they had that armor. Or a WW2 German Sturmdechets. Hard to tell.

  • i'm not sure but i think it's a severly damaged PT-76

  • please someone tell me a name of that song?? PLEASE !!!!

  • @ 2:23 A big part of the Bradley's ERA is stripped and there are Iraqis nearby, this leaves me speculating that they're found some new material for their IEDs....

  • Not really they could of just increased the weight of the IED.

  • im very glad to see here and couple american destroyed tanks

  • and living in the US...what a peice of shit u r...gues it sadens you there was an awful lot of russian scrap huh....i bet a douchebag like you even protests and the funerals of US soldiers....

  • dude calm down he gots a point.......americans never show in the newspaper tht they suffered casulties they just say tht hthey won the battle....

  • the point is, he was GLAD to see American tanks...fact is, you dont see many....but to be glad...thats sickening...if you watch the nes...they DO show knocked out Abrams...especialy on FOX new.

  • americans are fucking bitches attaking other countries, the solders whent their for money and i am glad to see those murdereds die. fuking merceners thats what they are

  • And you sir, are a fucking moronic loser. You cannot spell worth a fucking damn, and seem like you are a well percent homosexual. Correct me if I am wrong but I think you have seven misspelled words in your comment. I will type in your diction skills, YOU BE A MORON!!

  • well, the abrams tanks you saw were all destroyed INTERNALLY by the US in order to protect technology. usually a lucky rpg taking out the tracks

  • yup....and they should...not to mention the armour tech alone....did you see the new tank yet.,...

  • new tank?

  • yea i guss your right but we still have the whole contry and thousands of tanks roling in the streats so that should be a good sign that we have won this war.

  • he should protest the funerals, i mean wtf does the US need afghanisatn for? or iraq?, u guys should just leave the world alone, and stop crippling 3rd world countrys, just so u can live a good life and own 2 cars and a big house. u make me sick u shitbag

  • spoken lile a true socialist...not every American has all that you fucking idiot, and if i did see someone protesting any soldiers funeral, id personaly put my foot up thier ass......listen dickhead...3rd world countries do it to eachother every day...i dont see thr saudis or dubai bailing out suffering fellow muslims...look in the mirror, that should really make you sick....go fuck urself

  • Spoken like a true NAZI loving NEOCON.

    Just look at this guys friends list I wasnt surprised to see one of his friends is NAZI.

    Why don't you go shoot helpless mexicans jumping over the border and leave the politics to people with a little more HUMANITY.

  • spoken like a true bleeding heart liberal...if i was shjooting the helpless mexicans, oh...that many of wich are criminals and gang members, id be doing my prat in keeping this country clean, sure...lets let ilegals in so we can go further into debt....who carse what any of my friends are....hell, bill ayers is obams friend and hes president...what does that tell you, so take ur HUMANITY and go fuck urself....

  • Man wake up! the US economy has been depending on cheap labor from mexican workers for the last century, the reason why the USA is fucked today is because of your IDOL bush and his HOLI CRUSADES for oil.

    As for the gangs, if local gangs didn't have it so easy in the USA, these foreign gangs wouldn't find it so easy to operate in the states...

  • no the cheap labor was brought on by clinton and NAFTA and the outsourcing of American industry my idol pffffffff t and gangs have it tough in the US. are you smoking dogshit...wake up kid...and learn the facts b4 you open ur mouth. BTW not much oil is coming in from iraq, and 4 ur info it was a war for the war machine industry you really better start thinking in the terms of big buisness and military progects and spending honestly thnk about that, ull see, its both parties when u get down to it

  • immigrant laborers contribute to the gnp (gross national product, because i know you aren't familiar with that, is the total material and economic production of a nation). if you don't believe me, ask anyone in the agricultural industry. although they are not involved in all aspects of agriculture, their contributions are signifigant. the only reason immigrant laborers are utilized is due to the fact that americans will not work as hard for the money offered.

  • CONSIDER THIS, the rich, land owning businessmen you idolize are hiring the immigrant laborers, causing the influx you hate so much. NAFTA was drafted by bush sr. who was unable to ratify the document due to the end of his term; clinton actually amended the document to better protect american jobs. don't believe it? but anyway, let's forget nafta, where are all of our tech and manufacturing jobs going? thank the "fiscally conservative", outsourcing, importing, religious right

  • the very same people who scream that an increased taxation on their wealth will be detremental to the economy; even as they destroy the very foundation of the economy (industrial manufacturing, healthy workforce/consumer base), by eliminating jobs, but then they expect you to shoulder the vast weight of the expense of government. they are rich, but they want you to pay for all of it. these are the people you defend.

  • you sound more like you have an eax to grind...you sound just like the new administration..and remember...either side will do the same...i just like to sleep at night knowing we have some sort of defence....and with obama slowly picking away at what we have..we wont for long, stay on your side of the fence.

  • stay on my side of the fence? it amuses me when you head full of shyte idiots talk to me. sorry for the delay, busy; but i have plenty of time at the moment, so.......... talking in circles gets you nowhere really fast. defense? afghanistan and pakistan have a true priority for the defense of a nation under seige in a clandestine scenario the likes of which we are experiencing now. now you tell me, what seems to be the direction of renewed military focus?

  • paul van dyk "Lets Go" is the song

  • lol. in today's modern world. thick armor and shit is getting useless. that makes us all even. So all of u should start to shut the fuck up already. even one molotov can destroy a fucking tank.

  • you dumb shit molotoves have no penitrating power, how is a glass bottle with gas in it subosed to destroy a tank, if it waz that simple why woult russia have spent billions on rpg, or america billions on at-4, you should explore google before you try and sound smart.

  • You are the one that should STFU. A Molotov Cocktail CANNOT destroy a modern tank. The tank's engine is sealed so the burning gasoline doesn't reach it. And the armor is not getting thicker, it is being improved. Shaped charges have forced designers to abandon thickening rolled homogenous armor so instead of that they developed explosive reactive armor and composite armor.

  • lots of t 54 55 in this movie i gess the tank that was supposed to be a record breaker has lost the title :)

  • well it was designed over a half a century ago... so that might have something to do with it...

  • and i was talking about the t-55 and the guys blaming it for being easy to destroy.

  • What is the name of this song?

  • 2:05 ...nice KV2

  • Good Clip!

    What is the name of this song?

  • dunno but i think its H.I.M

  • no it is metallica

    "the unforgiven"