@ArmoredZimpa There is going to be the "individual carbine" competition to take the M4's place, the ACR, SCAR-L, XCR, and M416, I am rooting for the ACR, if Busmaster brings the weight back down to 6.5 pounds with a mag.
If he said that this one has 6 positions for the adjustable buttstock then that SCAR has to be the Heavy because the Light has 3 or 4 (one of the two) positions for the buttstock. I might be wrong, i cant be sure.
@dodgedieselpower35 Why should I shutup? I'm just stating facts. And diesels suck ass, gasoline engine are waaaayyy better and dont sound like they are going to die at any second.
you truly are a jackass, aren't you? So you're saying that gas engines get way more low end torque? that they haul more? and you sound like another call of duty idiot who thinks they know everything about guns. i still trying to get over the fact that you said diesels sound like they're going to die...you must drive a Mitsubishi, or some nissan bullshit?
@scuds03 u know gasoline is a bi-product of diesel, therfore it does not "suck ass" because 1.) that would be gross lol and 2.) we need it to make gasoline, and in my opinion diesel and petrol are about the same
@Artjom117 judging by the way you talk, you have no idea what your talking about. first off, call of duty should never be mentioned in a video that has to do with REAL guns. second, the SCAR in MW2 is the SCAR-H, firing the 7.62x51 NATO, while the one featured in this video is the SCAR-L, firing the 5.56x45 NATO. completely different. and 3rd, MW2 does not depict the recoil of firearms like in real life. so please, we all wish your kind would stay away from videos like this... have a nice day :)
i think the scar is a great weapon but i think i would personally prefer the Bushmaster ACR just cause it can be fitted with 7.62/6.8/5.56 and even a lower receiver designed to take ak 47 mags. the acr just seems more versatile, especially with different barrel lengths, although you can have those with the scar too. regardless both weapons are easily capable of replacing the m16 a4/m16 a3/m4
@darkbearrider bushmaster is not actually producing the lower receiver for 7.62x39 or 7.62x51, and even if they did after buying the new lower receiver, new barrel, magazines, bolt carrier group, and bolt you might as well just buy another gun because you will be spending that much if not more. the scar is actually lighter and has less recoil as well, definitely the better weapon.
@charlestheman69 are you talking about the civilian versions as far as the whole 7.62 mm uppers go? as for the recoil, i have heard different things about whether the scar has more recoil, or it has less, etc. so idk what to make of that. but with the 6.8 mm capability i think the acr would be great for the military (more stopping power, but not sacrificing muzzle velocity, or range).
@darkbearrider well currently there aren't to my knowledge anything other than the civilian version seeing as special operations command adopted the scar platform and not the acr, not to say that some other govt agencies are not using but i haven't heard about it. as for the 6.8spc round, i do like that capability but it's not like the military has a big supply of 6.8 ammo laying around to make use of that capability other than when they were developing it and testing.
@TwinklesPussMaster61 the m14 and scar h do not used the same 7.62 round. the scar h uses 7.62 X 39mm while m14 uses 7.62 X 51mm. m14 is used as a designated marksmen rifle or sometimes a shorter range sniper rifle. so m14 and scar h have different purposes. and the m14 is really not "overused," just cause mostly snipers use it. but the US is keeping the scar h mostly cause it seems more reliable than the ACR. short answer: scar h will not replace m14 (lol)
@TwinklesPussMaster61 well...not so fast, m110 (also used m14 round) sniper system is kindve the new kid on the block but its more of a sniper's weapons as opposed to a designated marksman rifle, so i think the m14 (or m14 mod 0) will still have a role :) M110 has a barrel that is 2 inches longer, so a lil bit more accuracy, but i think the m110 will just replace the m24.
@darkbearrider Oh. I didn't think about that but the m14 has a fixed stock which some people like and others like the pistol grip so they would use a m110.
@TwinklesPussMaster61 not if you get an m14 mod 0 ebr lower receiver which as an adjustable stock, shorter overall length, picitanny rail (at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions). lighter weight, and a pistol grip. so, if you want a better m14, you can just take the upper from and old school m14 and put it into the EBR (enhanced battle rifle) lower :D
The SCAR17 and the M14 use the same exact round it is a 7.62X51 NATO/.308. 7.62x39 is the AK47/SKS round. The truth about 7.62 NATO is that it is useful at farther distances than the 5.56 but when you fire it from a 16 inch barrel (like the SCAR17), this negates some of its advantages. The 5.56 is still a deadly round at point targets within 600 yards from an 18"+ rifle. The 308 from 16" barrel is maybe effective for another 100 yards but stretch the barrel four more inches and it can go 1K+
@Sleeper362 that is true, but if you are already using the m14 (as a designated marksmen) there arent necessarily any advantages to switching over to the scar h, since you would have to change upper receivers anyways. i like the acr because of the 6.8 spc round capabilities, which the scar does not have. although it would take a while to accumulate healthy stockpiles of this new ammunition....
@darkbearrider I think an M14 would actually be better than the SCAR-H for a marksman, it has a longer barrel , which means better long range accuracy. The SCAR-H is more to give the rifleman more punch than the 5.56, not to replace marksman rifles. AFAIK.
@Xiolablu3 i mean i agree with you, but just recognize that you can use a 20 inch upper in 7.62 NATO for the SCAR, just sayin....i like the m14 ebr too, just cause its a classic, but theoretically the SCAR has the capabilities to match the m14, so sadly, it very well may be replaced.... :( but that's the future....
@darkbearrider Ahh, yes, I see your point, yes the SCAR can add a longer barrel. Iwas thinking of the SCARH with the shorter barrel, but it can be changed, You are correct, the SCAR H could replace the M14 as a marksman rifle with that longer barrel AFAIK.
@Artjom117 You obviously have no firearms experience at all. You judging a weapon from just its recoil, which shows in the video his stance isn't a position for recoil control, makes you another kid that will never be capable to think first before commenting.
@Artjom117 you need to learn not to compare video game physics with real life physics. if you have a good shooting stance, you will recoil less. please don't mention video games at all, especially modern warfare whatever. it really makes you look bad.
@Artjom117 i want you to shoot any assult rifle in "your stance" the first gun i ever shot, an m4 carbine, made my shoulder bruise instantly. video games dont mean anything, also the US MILITARY, one of the best in the world, is using this gun, the FN2000 is an unsuccesfull weapon and is not used, besides prototypes.
@ISAJirafProductions Ummm, the FN 2000 is used by many militaries. The Peruvian Special Forces, Pakistan, Slovenia, Belgium Special Forces, Indian anti-terrorism units, I could go on and on. To say it is unsuccessful is simply not true.
@ISAJirafProductions the f2000 is used by quite a few militaries around the world... but it's a specialty weapon, not really designed as a standard service rifle... just because the us doesn't use it doesn't mean it isn't successful, the us military just doesn't believe in bullpups.
@Artjom117 taking slow precise shots is how our soldiers are trained to fight. They don't go shooting Automatic like in cod because that waste ammo. the more ammo you waste the more you have to carry, the more you carry the heavier and slower you are. In combat moving fast means staying alive
I'm mesmerized by fatboy with the plumber's crack and tacitcal sweat doughnut running down his back. His spare tire jiggles when he fires. Nice matching cargo pants and rappel belts.
Larry Vickers, whose opinion I value more than the anonymous internet wag's opinion, said if he was still causing death and destruction for a living he would think hard about using the FN SCAR system as a tool of choice.His main criticism of it was the frontsight interfered with the optics. His guest another spec-op said that ultimately the goal was to replace the AR system with the SCAR. Good luck politicking that one all the way through.
i would classify the SCAR H as more of a battle rifle than a AR, plus the fact it fires 7.62 and the SCAR L fires a 5.56 wich is properly classified as a carbine
Too bad that they are running into a lot of problems with this rifle. I airsoft with several guys who were or are still operators in the military, and neither had much in the way of good things to say about the SCAR light. The heavy was a different story though.
@ewoke685 You don't say? I guess US SOCOM decided that contracting FNH to produce a new weapon system for the SEALs and other units was just for shits and giggles. Am I right?
Look, the M4 is a decent platform, but it does have its limitations. The whole concept behind the SCAR was to correct these flaws, and to provide a platform that could fill several roles.
Throw on the 10" barrel and you have a CQB weapon. Use the 18" and you have a DMR. Hell, it's even been set up to be used as a SAW.
@rentahero99 sorry that was my brother who has not a clue about anything but i do prefer the m4 but the scar is a big time versitile weapon of course but i still love the m4
Cool gun. I love the military was in the army. I believe if civilians cannot have the same weapons as the military then the military shouldn't have those weapons. If the u.s government can tell you what gun you can and cannot have you are not free and therefore are not fighting for freedom.we dont run the government the govt runs us! Sad but the government is out of control
@FunySkywalker Hey Scripps I Guarantee You Wont Walk Into An American House When We Have Our guns Huh? Its So The Freedom Of Every Man Can Be Perserved By Himself.
@FunySkywalker Sorry bro but your wrong. if someone can convince themselves to kill with a gun they can convince themselves to kill with a knife or a car. taking guns away will only change the headline from "man shoots neighbor" to "man stabs neighbor" or "runs down neighbor with car". taking guns away will accomplish nothing more than taking guns away
@fawakamaha If you hate somebody, for some reason, is very more simple to kill him with a gun, than with a knife or a car. The power that the gun give you becomes the temptation very more difficult to resist.
@FunySkywalker A good point, however the majority of gun related crimes are committed with illegally obtained guns, ie taking guns away from the responsible just leaves them vulnerable and the violent with an advantage. second a significant amount of gun related death comes from suicide, 30% last time I checked.
@fawakamaha It's very more easy to get a gun illegally in a country with a lot of guns. It can be robbed from any house. The money you don't spend in guns can be used in better passive security. A thief with a gun in a country with "no guns" don't think in shoot when they see the owner, because he probably don't have a gun. He will only threaten the owner with the gun. In a country like USA they probably thinks shooting inmediatly because the other person will have a gun.
@FunySkywalker thats a great point. temptation is a big factor. My counter is pretty long for the you tube comments block. If you want to change the venue I would love to continue the debate
There is no such thing as an "assault rifle", that's a term the gun-grabbers use to frighten the pubic at large. Try not to propagate that lie, just call it what it is, a semi-automatic rifle.
@Hashplant47 Assault rifles exist, you idiot. Modern militarys use select-fire rifles firing an intermediate cartridge and those are called assault rifles.
@Hashplant47 what you are trying to say (and failing) is that the media's naming of civilian semi-auto rifles as "assault rifles" is incorrect. I would agree with you there. But assault rifles DO exist, they are generally only for military use and are select fire.
I saw a comment somewhere back in the discussion the MW2 is just like real combat. Really? Take it from someone who's been there, it's not. In the real world if you take fire or ordinance, there is no re-set button, there are no do overs, there are no happy fucking endings. There is only a flag draped coffin and grieving relatives. So do us grown ups a favor, don't talk like you've been there and done that. Play your game and keep it in context. Just like real combat, Babies, you have no idea.
@acon127 well, Magpul was the original manufacturer of the rifle and called it the masada, but then they sold they rights of that rifle Bushmaster and Remington and they made some improvements on that rifle and "republished" it as the Adaptive Combat Rifle (or ACR) and Bushmaster sold/sells the civilian issue and Remington handles selling it to the military. So the original Masada was technically never issued or sold to the military
@danster3461 Scar L is 5.56, Scar heavy is 7.62, Both NATO. Its a nato weapon and there is no other round imbetween 5.56 and 7.62. Stop playing video games your not some expert.
@danster3461 6.5 is cool but i would just do it like the bushmaster acr make just a gun with the automatik kalashnikov round that would be much better for the special forces to leave a small "footprint"
@stevenxvx2 That is true but imagine a bull pup m14 with the crane stock , 6.5 Grendel and a rail system similar to the m4. god damn that would be beautiful
@danster3461 M14 is one of my favorites. Just want to mention the SCAR is a good weapon. But is not superior enough for the budget we have to purchase them. Not sure if my source is correct, but they mentioned the possibility of replacing the M14 with SCAR H. We will just have to wait and see...
@curseofa5r5a I dont know me and a bud went to the range with his rec7(m468) it just doesnt have the range try it out youll see what im talking about the 6.5 grendel is a beast. But honestly the m416 and m417 or even the m4a1 and mk14 mod 0 are better than the scar in my opinion I mean dont get me wrong the market to special operations so its all about what they like.
@danster3461 i though it has a pretty good flat tragectory within 300mts, thanks for the info, so at this point the 5,56 still beign a good choice for long barrel rifles, but i really think the carabines need a caliber with better stoping power, the 6,5 could be a good choise for those, any way the concept of an multicaliber special forces rifle still being pretty interesting in my concern, so why do you say its inferior to other modern rifles?
@curseofa5r5a Well theres just not enough that its bringing to the table honestly its reliability is nothing special its not the most ergonomic nor the lightest so if you can get better you should definitely go for it. Its definitely a solid platform but if i were a seal id prefer a 416 or 417 because it is more modular and versatile.
@danster3461 totally agree with you, reability its not problem for a well trained and disciplinated solider, and the orgonomics of the AR-15 platafrom are just impresive, the combination of that plataform with a pretty reliable action and a good crafting will make one of the best weapons ever created, thats what a hk 416 is
@kansastwista I know right The 7.62 is impractical keep the m14 make something new and that is adaptable if you have the 6.5 it works great at medium range like afghanistan and still does cqb.
The 556 is a rifle round. A carbine is a short rifle. The origional ar15/m16 had a 20" barrel and could launch the m193 well over 3000 fps. at the muzzle. the problems come in when you shorten the barrel length and you loose close to 1200 fps, at the muzzle. what you gain in mobility you loose in range. thats why a carbine is only good for about 150yrds. beyond that, the rounds dont tumble and break apart in tissue like they would if they were fired out of a rifle length barrel
@centurian318 very true. i dont know why the military doesnt make ammo spicifically for the m4. they are capable of doing and achieving those velocitys. im pretty sure they are anyway i reload the 62 gr m855 to their specs and actually i can make the bullet have a fast muzzle vel then the standard m855. but the huge change in elevation like in afghan or the weather you might be flirting with pressure.
Special forces doughnut ops is...is too...too...just continue without me. Im going to just...rest a bit. Typing is causing...is it hot in here?
thadea 1 week ago
So that first guy shooting... the fat one... is he special forces?
LoboOddball 1 week ago
I rented one at a range once ,it felt so good to shoot it lol (I'm only 14) I hope one day I can buy one
battlefeild3airsoft 2 weeks ago
are the scar replacing the m4?
ArmoredZimpa 2 months ago
@ArmoredZimpa from what I heard they are going to be interchangeable... but might one day replace the M4. USA fears change. Haha
UraniumReaper 2 months ago
@ArmoredZimpa Hope so.
jasonfish07 2 months ago
@ArmoredZimpa The plan seems to be keeping the M4 and let the SCAR-H replace the M16.
vonOhzu 1 month ago
@vonOhzu well thats nice :)
ArmoredZimpa 1 month ago
@ArmoredZimpa There is going to be the "individual carbine" competition to take the M4's place, the ACR, SCAR-L, XCR, and M416, I am rooting for the ACR, if Busmaster brings the weight back down to 6.5 pounds with a mag.
theslamminsammon 1 month ago
If he said that this one has 6 positions for the adjustable buttstock then that SCAR has to be the Heavy because the Light has 3 or 4 (one of the two) positions for the buttstock. I might be wrong, i cant be sure.
APACHESTRATHE140 4 months ago
@APACHESTRATHE140 The generation 3 SCAR has a 6 position stock. the Gen. 2 only has 3 or 4
TwinklesPussMaster61 4 months ago
SCAR sucks I get way more kills with the Desert Eagle
scuds03 6 months ago
@scuds03
please shut the hell up.
dodgedieselpower35 6 months ago
@dodgedieselpower35 Why should I shutup? I'm just stating facts. And diesels suck ass, gasoline engine are waaaayyy better and dont sound like they are going to die at any second.
scuds03 6 months ago
@scuds03
you truly are a jackass, aren't you? So you're saying that gas engines get way more low end torque? that they haul more? and you sound like another call of duty idiot who thinks they know everything about guns. i still trying to get over the fact that you said diesels sound like they're going to die...you must drive a Mitsubishi, or some nissan bullshit?
dodgedieselpower35 6 months ago
@dodgedieselpower35 Dodge charger srt-8 and I bet its faster than any pos diesel you drive.
scuds03 6 months ago
@scuds03
my truck has a smarty on it to make it go faster, i beat my friends Buick regal with a super charger. you lose buddy.
dodgedieselpower35 6 months ago
@scuds03 u know gasoline is a bi-product of diesel, therfore it does not "suck ass" because 1.) that would be gross lol and 2.) we need it to make gasoline, and in my opinion diesel and petrol are about the same
P4ckerBacker52 5 months ago
@scuds03 If say you with an Desert Eagle went up against someone with a Scar lets just say you wont be able to use your little Desert Eagle again.
wolfpressedent 5 months ago
@Artjom117 and he's taking his time with the shots, not managing to fight with the recoil.
armydude690 6 months ago
@Artjom117 judging by the way you talk, you have no idea what your talking about. first off, call of duty should never be mentioned in a video that has to do with REAL guns. second, the SCAR in MW2 is the SCAR-H, firing the 7.62x51 NATO, while the one featured in this video is the SCAR-L, firing the 5.56x45 NATO. completely different. and 3rd, MW2 does not depict the recoil of firearms like in real life. so please, we all wish your kind would stay away from videos like this... have a nice day :)
armydude690 6 months ago
I guess I can start from the front and go to the rear.
RichardClarkeToddIII 6 months ago
Sick! However give me a .308 AR with 16 inch barrel and a Acog and im good to go.
Goontrader2 7 months ago
to expect the army to replace their old Yankee m16, delicate and
"jam"with rifles more reliable?
hermosotealonso 7 months ago
But will It blend?
Alphacaliber 7 months ago
@Alphacaliber Faggot. Old comment is old.
SoCalAirs0ft 7 months ago
@SoCalAirs0ft Airsoft? And you are calling me a faggot? Trollololol
Alphacaliber 7 months ago
@Alphacaliber *sigh* the lack of intelligence of people when they figure out WHY I play airsoft.
SoCalAirs0ft 7 months ago
How do I feel about this?
ilovetippy667 8 months ago
the man keeps dropping it! LOL =D
NTR09 8 months ago
i think the scar is a great weapon but i think i would personally prefer the Bushmaster ACR just cause it can be fitted with 7.62/6.8/5.56 and even a lower receiver designed to take ak 47 mags. the acr just seems more versatile, especially with different barrel lengths, although you can have those with the scar too. regardless both weapons are easily capable of replacing the m16 a4/m16 a3/m4
darkbearrider 9 months ago
@darkbearrider bushmaster is not actually producing the lower receiver for 7.62x39 or 7.62x51, and even if they did after buying the new lower receiver, new barrel, magazines, bolt carrier group, and bolt you might as well just buy another gun because you will be spending that much if not more. the scar is actually lighter and has less recoil as well, definitely the better weapon.
charlestheman69 9 months ago
@charlestheman69 are you talking about the civilian versions as far as the whole 7.62 mm uppers go? as for the recoil, i have heard different things about whether the scar has more recoil, or it has less, etc. so idk what to make of that. but with the 6.8 mm capability i think the acr would be great for the military (more stopping power, but not sacrificing muzzle velocity, or range).
darkbearrider 9 months ago
@darkbearrider well currently there aren't to my knowledge anything other than the civilian version seeing as special operations command adopted the scar platform and not the acr, not to say that some other govt agencies are not using but i haven't heard about it. as for the 6.8spc round, i do like that capability but it's not like the military has a big supply of 6.8 ammo laying around to make use of that capability other than when they were developing it and testing.
charlestheman69 9 months ago
@darkbearrider Do you think the US will keep the scar h just because of the bigger round? because the m14 already has that but its kind of over used.
TwinklesPussMaster61 8 months ago
@TwinklesPussMaster61 the m14 and scar h do not used the same 7.62 round. the scar h uses 7.62 X 39mm while m14 uses 7.62 X 51mm. m14 is used as a designated marksmen rifle or sometimes a shorter range sniper rifle. so m14 and scar h have different purposes. and the m14 is really not "overused," just cause mostly snipers use it. but the US is keeping the scar h mostly cause it seems more reliable than the ACR. short answer: scar h will not replace m14 (lol)
darkbearrider 8 months ago
@darkbearrider thank god. I like the m14 and the scar. its nice to know they are not competing with each other.
TwinklesPussMaster61 8 months ago
@TwinklesPussMaster61 well...not so fast, m110 (also used m14 round) sniper system is kindve the new kid on the block but its more of a sniper's weapons as opposed to a designated marksman rifle, so i think the m14 (or m14 mod 0) will still have a role :) M110 has a barrel that is 2 inches longer, so a lil bit more accuracy, but i think the m110 will just replace the m24.
darkbearrider 8 months ago
@darkbearrider Oh. I didn't think about that but the m14 has a fixed stock which some people like and others like the pistol grip so they would use a m110.
TwinklesPussMaster61 8 months ago
@TwinklesPussMaster61 not if you get an m14 mod 0 ebr lower receiver which as an adjustable stock, shorter overall length, picitanny rail (at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions). lighter weight, and a pistol grip. so, if you want a better m14, you can just take the upper from and old school m14 and put it into the EBR (enhanced battle rifle) lower :D
darkbearrider 8 months ago
The SCAR17 and the M14 use the same exact round it is a 7.62X51 NATO/.308. 7.62x39 is the AK47/SKS round. The truth about 7.62 NATO is that it is useful at farther distances than the 5.56 but when you fire it from a 16 inch barrel (like the SCAR17), this negates some of its advantages. The 5.56 is still a deadly round at point targets within 600 yards from an 18"+ rifle. The 308 from 16" barrel is maybe effective for another 100 yards but stretch the barrel four more inches and it can go 1K+
Sleeper362 7 months ago
@Sleeper362 that is true, but if you are already using the m14 (as a designated marksmen) there arent necessarily any advantages to switching over to the scar h, since you would have to change upper receivers anyways. i like the acr because of the 6.8 spc round capabilities, which the scar does not have. although it would take a while to accumulate healthy stockpiles of this new ammunition....
darkbearrider 7 months ago
@darkbearrider I think an M14 would actually be better than the SCAR-H for a marksman, it has a longer barrel , which means better long range accuracy. The SCAR-H is more to give the rifleman more punch than the 5.56, not to replace marksman rifles. AFAIK.
Xiolablu3 7 months ago
@Xiolablu3 i mean i agree with you, but just recognize that you can use a 20 inch upper in 7.62 NATO for the SCAR, just sayin....i like the m14 ebr too, just cause its a classic, but theoretically the SCAR has the capabilities to match the m14, so sadly, it very well may be replaced.... :( but that's the future....
darkbearrider 7 months ago
@darkbearrider Ahh, yes, I see your point, yes the SCAR can add a longer barrel. Iwas thinking of the SCARH with the shorter barrel, but it can be changed, You are correct, the SCAR H could replace the M14 as a marksman rifle with that longer barrel AFAIK.
Xiolablu3 6 months ago
@Xiolablu3 yea...fortunately or unfortunately.... but the m14 has had a glorious service record, so, maybe it is time for change
darkbearrider 6 months ago
why dose every one think the gas piston is the newest and best thing its been around since the 30's or 40'
thatoutherguy253 9 months ago
I Gould rather use the FN 2000 or the AR15 than the bad SCAR!
Artjom117 9 months ago
@Artjom117
You are fucking retarded.
shishiromura 9 months ago
I like still like the SCAR from Call of Duty Modern Warfare, but Look at the heavy recoil of the scar in the video!!
The Gun SUCKS in recoil! Look at the shooting Guy! He can fire only One precise Shot in 3 seconds!
At the end the Gun sucks in real life!!!
Artjom117 9 months ago
@Artjom117 Just because you mentioned MW2, your opinion is invalid.
RedSandStudios 9 months ago 70
@RedSandStudios no mw2 is amazing but socom is noob
guyoffun 5 months ago
@guyoffun can i not visit a gun vidoe without seeing something posted by some cod bitch? shut the fuck up you ass goblin
MrAbstractReality10 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrAbstractReality10 marked as spam
guyoffun 4 months ago
@Artjom117 You obviously have no firearms experience at all. You judging a weapon from just its recoil, which shows in the video his stance isn't a position for recoil control, makes you another kid that will never be capable to think first before commenting.
tuck234 9 months ago 3
@Artjom117 you need to learn not to compare video game physics with real life physics. if you have a good shooting stance, you will recoil less. please don't mention video games at all, especially modern warfare whatever. it really makes you look bad.
cy156326 9 months ago 2
@Artjom117 i want you to shoot any assult rifle in "your stance" the first gun i ever shot, an m4 carbine, made my shoulder bruise instantly. video games dont mean anything, also the US MILITARY, one of the best in the world, is using this gun, the FN2000 is an unsuccesfull weapon and is not used, besides prototypes.
ISAJirafProductions 9 months ago
@ISAJirafProductions Ummm, the FN 2000 is used by many militaries. The Peruvian Special Forces, Pakistan, Slovenia, Belgium Special Forces, Indian anti-terrorism units, I could go on and on. To say it is unsuccessful is simply not true.
waffenmacht 9 months ago
@ISAJirafProductions the f2000 is used by quite a few militaries around the world... but it's a specialty weapon, not really designed as a standard service rifle... just because the us doesn't use it doesn't mean it isn't successful, the us military just doesn't believe in bullpups.
Synthiotics 9 months ago
@Artjom117 taking slow precise shots is how our soldiers are trained to fight. They don't go shooting Automatic like in cod because that waste ammo. the more ammo you waste the more you have to carry, the more you carry the heavier and slower you are. In combat moving fast means staying alive
masterlukes6000 9 months ago
Great vid I know I get plenty of crap but I'd say my ruger SR556 would dust the scar in any situation
oifbull1 10 months ago
to bad its a fucking scar heavy the flash hider is a dead give away
redkinsrule215 10 months ago
@redkinsrule215 calm down its a SCAR-L they have the same flash hider but the H flash hider is longer as you can see this is the smaller flash hider
esowaych 10 months ago
To bad the SCAR receivers and furniture don't really match up like that.
dhena81 10 months ago
I'm mesmerized by fatboy with the plumber's crack and tacitcal sweat doughnut running down his back. His spare tire jiggles when he fires. Nice matching cargo pants and rappel belts.
navyavi469 10 months ago 35
@navyavi469 Best comment ever
DACFalloutRanger 10 months ago
@navyavi469 too much tactical krispy kreme
conciousness88 4 months ago
@navyavi469 he can be a fat as he likes , hes gettin to shoot it ............
kongman27 3 weeks ago
we want auto shooting not cc shoots
tonimontana123ujify 10 months ago
Larry Vickers, whose opinion I value more than the anonymous internet wag's opinion, said if he was still causing death and destruction for a living he would think hard about using the FN SCAR system as a tool of choice.His main criticism of it was the frontsight interfered with the optics. His guest another spec-op said that ultimately the goal was to replace the AR system with the SCAR. Good luck politicking that one all the way through.
oeyesea 1 year ago
yes sir
nikolasmaes99 1 year ago
i would classify the SCAR H as more of a battle rifle than a AR, plus the fact it fires 7.62 and the SCAR L fires a 5.56 wich is properly classified as a carbine
strader1234 1 year ago
Too bad that they are running into a lot of problems with this rifle. I airsoft with several guys who were or are still operators in the military, and neither had much in the way of good things to say about the SCAR light. The heavy was a different story though.
AceVendetta 1 year ago
@AceVendetta i call bullshit on you sir!
illadelphripper 1 year ago
lives up to it's name; it does not have as high of rate of fire, but it will be used by men that don't need 700rpm to kill
illlite 1 year ago
the fat guy is NOT special forces!
PyschoticChimp 1 year ago
oh how I do love the ACOG.
blueheadcrazyguy 1 year ago
still prefer the m4 and m16 anyday :D back sweat so funny :D
kintatzu333 1 year ago
The M4 is a way better and mor used gun than ANY Scar design...
ewoke685 1 year ago
@ewoke685 You don't say? I guess US SOCOM decided that contracting FNH to produce a new weapon system for the SEALs and other units was just for shits and giggles. Am I right?
Look, the M4 is a decent platform, but it does have its limitations. The whole concept behind the SCAR was to correct these flaws, and to provide a platform that could fill several roles.
Throw on the 10" barrel and you have a CQB weapon. Use the 18" and you have a DMR. Hell, it's even been set up to be used as a SAW.
rentahero99 1 year ago 2
@rentahero99 sorry that was my brother who has not a clue about anything but i do prefer the m4 but the scar is a big time versitile weapon of course but i still love the m4
ewoke685 1 year ago
@ewoke685 no shit its more used, its been around for so long
TheMikevike 1 year ago
so the scar runs cooler then a normal M4?
jaguar447 1 year ago
at 0:36 that dude has a very good form for shooting he looks expirenced with rifles. back sweat...hmmm must be very hot out side. lol jk
tundraxwolf 1 year ago
You people are fucking retards that can't articulate a sentence.
scripps88 1 year ago
Cool gun. I love the military was in the army. I believe if civilians cannot have the same weapons as the military then the military shouldn't have those weapons. If the u.s government can tell you what gun you can and cannot have you are not free and therefore are not fighting for freedom.we dont run the government the govt runs us! Sad but the government is out of control
scripps88 1 year ago
@scripps88 Sad americans. You will be more free if you don't need a pistol in your pillow. But it is difficult with a rifle in every house...
FunySkywalker 1 year ago
@FunySkywalker Hey Scripps I Guarantee You Wont Walk Into An American House When We Have Our guns Huh? Its So The Freedom Of Every Man Can Be Perserved By Himself.
JaredFury 1 year ago
@FunySkywalker your an idiot, your not making any sense!
scripps88 1 year ago
@scripps88 great argumentation...
FunySkywalker 1 year ago
@FunySkywalker thanks man! you seem pretty cool
scripps88 1 year ago
@FunySkywalker What does that even mean?
scilonthreat 1 year ago
@scilonthreat simply
Less difficult to obtain a gun -> More violent crimes
More difficult to obtatin a gun -> Less violent crimes
Guns don't make america more free, they make american more dangerous.
FunySkywalker 1 year ago
@FunySkywalker dangerous for the idiots who acquire guns and try to start crap. straight up bish! :)
Tardeder 1 year ago
@FunySkywalker Sorry bro but your wrong. if someone can convince themselves to kill with a gun they can convince themselves to kill with a knife or a car. taking guns away will only change the headline from "man shoots neighbor" to "man stabs neighbor" or "runs down neighbor with car". taking guns away will accomplish nothing more than taking guns away
fawakamaha 1 year ago
@fawakamaha If you hate somebody, for some reason, is very more simple to kill him with a gun, than with a knife or a car. The power that the gun give you becomes the temptation very more difficult to resist.
FunySkywalker 1 year ago
@FunySkywalker A good point, however the majority of gun related crimes are committed with illegally obtained guns, ie taking guns away from the responsible just leaves them vulnerable and the violent with an advantage. second a significant amount of gun related death comes from suicide, 30% last time I checked.
fawakamaha 1 year ago
@fawakamaha It's very more easy to get a gun illegally in a country with a lot of guns. It can be robbed from any house. The money you don't spend in guns can be used in better passive security. A thief with a gun in a country with "no guns" don't think in shoot when they see the owner, because he probably don't have a gun. He will only threaten the owner with the gun. In a country like USA they probably thinks shooting inmediatly because the other person will have a gun.
FunySkywalker 1 year ago
@FunySkywalker thats a great point. temptation is a big factor. My counter is pretty long for the you tube comments block. If you want to change the venue I would love to continue the debate
fawakamaha 1 year ago
Hahaha the fat dude with his pants falling down is an OPERATOR! YEEEEEEAH!
rltw04 1 year ago
no more bayonets i guess
scilonthreat 1 year ago
@scilonthreat Yarp. Seeing as the SCAR is already so light, a bayonet would just make it twice as heavy XD
ThePlatonicRomance 1 year ago
Comment removed
kraken58 1 year ago
Sorry to interrupt the experts here, I'll only be a moment....
Recent reports indicate that the Department of Defense / US Military have decided to cancel the issue for service of the SCAR-L (MK16 MOD-0).
Any updates on this news anyone ?
guthywoodry 1 year ago
@guthywoodry
From what i know they are going with the Scar-H
gibben100 1 year ago
There is no such thing as an "assault rifle", that's a term the gun-grabbers use to frighten the pubic at large. Try not to propagate that lie, just call it what it is, a semi-automatic rifle.
Hashplant47 1 year ago
@Hashplant47 that sounded really gay
free69r 1 year ago
@free69r What are you, 12? Time to get off your mommies computer
Hashplant47 1 year ago
@Hashplant47 "theres no such thing as an assault rifle". that sounds fuckin dumb.
free69r 1 year ago
@free69r Shows what you know, better stop while you're behind.
Hashplant47 1 year ago
@Hashplant47 what?
free69r 1 year ago
@Hashplant47 so STg. 44 Assault Rifle wasnt the first assault rifle then?
Slotty 1 year ago
@Hashplant47 Assault rifles exist, you idiot. Modern militarys use select-fire rifles firing an intermediate cartridge and those are called assault rifles.
O8SERVER 1 year ago
@Hashplant47 what you are trying to say (and failing) is that the media's naming of civilian semi-auto rifles as "assault rifles" is incorrect. I would agree with you there. But assault rifles DO exist, they are generally only for military use and are select fire.
O8SERVER 1 year ago
@Hashplant47 are you by any chance in bread?
dimiii1 1 year ago
I saw a comment somewhere back in the discussion the MW2 is just like real combat. Really? Take it from someone who's been there, it's not. In the real world if you take fire or ordinance, there is no re-set button, there are no do overs, there are no happy fucking endings. There is only a flag draped coffin and grieving relatives. So do us grown ups a favor, don't talk like you've been there and done that. Play your game and keep it in context. Just like real combat, Babies, you have no idea.
Nicodemus98 1 year ago
its not special forces combat assault rifle its special operations
theolon43 1 year ago
One of the most advanced rifles in the world forget bullpup rifles!
RyanParody 1 year ago
The SCAR-L use M4/M16 mags. Right?
legokid87654321 1 year ago
@legokid87654321 Yes.
GTF425 1 year ago
Comment removed
stevenxvx2 1 year ago
Comment removed
stevenxvx2 1 year ago
@southparkboy119 im part of that 7% haha.
SCAR-H: Special Forces Combat Assault Rifle (L=Light, H=Heavy).
ACR: Adaptive Combat Rifle.
Spas-12: Special Purpose Assault Shotgun-12 Gauge.
EBR: Enhanced Battle Rifle.
USP .45: Universal Self-Loading Pistol.
UMP.45: Universal Machine Pistol.
AA-12: Atchison Assault
and so on, you guys get my point.
WitnessMELOx15 1 year ago
Now available in Coyote Fart Brown or Mexican Refread Bean color!
viper8red 1 year ago
im still sold on the H&K-416
paulnhafner48 1 year ago
@paulnhafner48 ewww!
marineman410410 1 year ago
how come this rifle didn't get incorporated into the military?
w55ks 1 year ago
@w55ks it did
marineman410410 1 year ago
@w55ks I believe it has been issued to the U.S. army rangers. The HK416 was issued to Delta Force I think.
babiesrevil 1 year ago
@southparkboy119
Amen, Bro! Doesnt matter what video you wtach, COD-kids are already there and they calim to have full experience.
Nogger86Germany 1 year ago
@southparkboy119 ya true and the acr is really called a masada
acon127 1 year ago
@acon127 well, Magpul was the original manufacturer of the rifle and called it the masada, but then they sold they rights of that rifle Bushmaster and Remington and they made some improvements on that rifle and "republished" it as the Adaptive Combat Rifle (or ACR) and Bushmaster sold/sells the civilian issue and Remington handles selling it to the military. So the original Masada was technically never issued or sold to the military
hkill09 1 year ago
Make the scar light in the 6.5 or at least make a scar medium. Any one else agree?
danster3461 1 year ago 33
@danster3461 agreed.
HYBRIDCOMBATIVES 1 year ago
@danster3461 fucking yes!!!
marineman410410 1 year ago
@danster3461 Scar L is 5.56, Scar heavy is 7.62, Both NATO. Its a nato weapon and there is no other round imbetween 5.56 and 7.62. Stop playing video games your not some expert.
PresidentialMoments 1 year ago
@PresidentialMoments what an idiot of course there's intermediate round's you my friend are mentally impaired.
danster3461 1 year ago
@PresidentialMoments Actually there are, 6.8 Remington, 6.5 Grendel, 7mm, 6mm.
MaxPayne725 1 year ago
@danster3461 more the calibers the better, get all the best the world has to offer
tbilisicentral 1 year ago
@tbilisicentral Damn straight
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 The US would use 6.8 considering 6.5 is Russian.
MaxPayne725 1 year ago
@danster3461 6.5 is cool but i would just do it like the bushmaster acr make just a gun with the automatik kalashnikov round that would be much better for the special forces to leave a small "footprint"
AAfireworks 1 year ago
@AAfireworks Personally i would like a famas with an adjustable fire rate and a higher mag capacity
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 def. agree and they prolly will at some point.....either 6.5 or a 6.8 spl. good thought though
Russosaurusrex 1 year ago
@Russosaurusrex yeah well i think the future assault rifles might be hybrids like the hk7
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 5.56 is actually good (not great) bullet for it's purpose.
Vultar666 1 year ago
@danster3461 I agree! 6.5 grendel is superior to 5.56 and 6.8! It has the possibility to even replace 7.62. All you need it new bolt and barrel.
stevenxvx2 1 year ago
@stevenxvx2 That is true but imagine a bull pup m14 with the crane stock , 6.5 Grendel and a rail system similar to the m4. god damn that would be beautiful
danster3461 1 year ago
Comment removed
stevenxvx2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@danster3461 M14 is one of my favorites. Just want to mention the SCAR is a good weapon. But is not superior enough for the budget we have to purchase them. Not sure if my source is correct, but they mentioned the possibility of replacing the M14 with SCAR H. We will just have to wait and see...
stevenxvx2 1 year ago
@danster3461 they are producing a scar h version chabered to 6.8spc and 6.5, but scar m its not a bad idea at all
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a I dont know me and a bud went to the range with his rec7(m468) it just doesnt have the range try it out youll see what im talking about the 6.5 grendel is a beast. But honestly the m416 and m417 or even the m4a1 and mk14 mod 0 are better than the scar in my opinion I mean dont get me wrong the market to special operations so its all about what they like.
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 what do you mean when you say that "it just doesnt have the range"?
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a It has significant drop at range.
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 i though it has a pretty good flat tragectory within 300mts, thanks for the info, so at this point the 5,56 still beign a good choice for long barrel rifles, but i really think the carabines need a caliber with better stoping power, the 6,5 could be a good choise for those, any way the concept of an multicaliber special forces rifle still being pretty interesting in my concern, so why do you say its inferior to other modern rifles?
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a Well theres just not enough that its bringing to the table honestly its reliability is nothing special its not the most ergonomic nor the lightest so if you can get better you should definitely go for it. Its definitely a solid platform but if i were a seal id prefer a 416 or 417 because it is more modular and versatile.
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 totally agree with you, reability its not problem for a well trained and disciplinated solider, and the orgonomics of the AR-15 platafrom are just impresive, the combination of that plataform with a pretty reliable action and a good crafting will make one of the best weapons ever created, thats what a hk 416 is
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a Exactly I mean at mid range automatic fire the scar might be more ideal but overall the 416 417 package delivers in every category.
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 amen
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@danster3461 best idea i've heard in a long time
kansastwista 1 year ago
@kansastwista I know right The 7.62 is impractical keep the m14 make something new and that is adaptable if you have the 6.5 it works great at medium range like afghanistan and still does cqb.
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 haha yeah i agree but i prefere 6.8 haha :)
TheSamuraininjaguy 1 year ago
@TheSamuraininjaguy nothing wrong with that like everything it has strengths and weaknesses.
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 great idea but weapon confusion would occur
morepaincom 1 year ago
@danster3461 LOL a scar medium, a 6.5 scar would be really nice though.......
xxthehuskycaboosexx 1 year ago
@danster3461 I've heard you can make modifications to the L model so it can chamber 6.8
TaZ101SAGA 1 year ago
@TaZ101SAGA :) not legally.
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 do you know what your talking about?
illlite 1 year ago
@illlite Yes I do papa's a gunsmith.
danster3461 1 year ago
@danster3461 Why? if you're gonna bring up the stupid arguement that 5.56 is too weak, then please don't reply.
garretpanda 1 year ago
@garretpanda Because the 5.56 is a carbine round a 6.5/6.8 is a real assault caliber 7.62 is a battle/ designated marksman caliber.
danster3461 1 year ago
The 556 is a rifle round. A carbine is a short rifle. The origional ar15/m16 had a 20" barrel and could launch the m193 well over 3000 fps. at the muzzle. the problems come in when you shorten the barrel length and you loose close to 1200 fps, at the muzzle. what you gain in mobility you loose in range. thats why a carbine is only good for about 150yrds. beyond that, the rounds dont tumble and break apart in tissue like they would if they were fired out of a rifle length barrel
centurian318 1 year ago
@centurian318 There all rifle capable but the 5.56 is better suited as a carbine round.
danster3461 1 year ago
@centurian318 very true. i dont know why the military doesnt make ammo spicifically for the m4. they are capable of doing and achieving those velocitys. im pretty sure they are anyway i reload the 62 gr m855 to their specs and actually i can make the bullet have a fast muzzle vel then the standard m855. but the huge change in elevation like in afghan or the weather you might be flirting with pressure.
stewpidaso26 1 year ago
@stewpidaso26
NATO commonality.
cr9527 11 months ago
i want that gun. D:
kirchhoff1814 1 year ago
back sweat.
sbsb69 1 year ago