Keep hearing USA Today, USA Today - I realize they all take the same route to work - it's just amazing the coincidences. Should have bought a lottery ticket that day!
The second plane was most likely O'Brien's C-130. The first plane hit the Pentagon, says Sucherman. But some people make us believe that the first and second one are the same airplane.
A newsman would naturally rehearse for a few minutes before going on air, of course...but "sonic boom" from a 757? "second plane?" -- embellishing pre-planted suggestions from "live" news reports of the WTC hits or yet another dutiful sayan?
These staged witnesses describe the little unusual details as if it's scripted, not the usual memories one recalls from such a shocking event, based on emotion.
Also strange he mentions that it was definately not a "ahh learjet or ahh ahh smaller jet ".
BY THE WAY... Isn't it funny how random security cameras from a pier on the Hudson River can capture footage of flight 1549 crash landing (Jan.16 2009)... yet, the pentagon (the most secured building in the world, with hundreds of security camera's surrounding the building) cannot so much as catch a glimpse of an aircraft hitting the pentagon! Once again... BULL SHIT!
I've been interviewed by news reporters a few times, and since when do you see a reporter look away from the person they are interviewing? they don't! they pay full attention because they are trying to get info! it's like she already knew what he was going to say (notice how she's nodding once he starts describing the plane, as if they practiced ahead of time) and of course he's affiliated with the media (USA Today). total and complete BULL SHIT! WAKE UP PEOPLE!
Notice the interviewers look on her face when Joel says it was a 757. It is at 0:37 seconds into the clip. A little bit of a distressed look on her face. What do you think?
Joel Sucherman could NOT see the Pentagon where he was stuck in traffic.
757 does not make a sonic boom.
Could be north of Citgo.
Another plane to the southwest, makes a beeline straight into the sky??? But there was no "second" plane. This must be the north of Citgo plane that didn't crash into the Pentagon.
Total And Complete Lie! He saw no body nor tail, This man is lying on the news. Look at the pictures of the pentagon...Immediately after the "Supposed" Giant Airplane hit the pentagon there was only a 16 foot wide hole in the side of the pentagon. The windows above the hole were completely intact and undamaged..However live news footage also shows witnesses reporting secondary explosions comming from the pentagon long after the "Supposed" Plane hit it.
Keep hearing USA Today, USA Today - I realize they all take the same route to work - it's just amazing the coincidences. Should have bought a lottery ticket that day!
milackk7 9 months ago
The second plane was most likely O'Brien's C-130. The first plane hit the Pentagon, says Sucherman. But some people make us believe that the first and second one are the same airplane.
MrKoenig1985 1 year ago
Comment removed
reccos3333 1 year ago
A newsman would naturally rehearse for a few minutes before going on air, of course...but "sonic boom" from a 757? "second plane?" -- embellishing pre-planted suggestions from "live" news reports of the WTC hits or yet another dutiful sayan?
JehanneDeLys 1 year ago 2
second plane understanding,
go to National Security Alert, Sensitive information 1-8
by Pilots for 9-11 truth, you will understand the second plane.
rshace 1 year ago
As second plane!?!
rshace 1 year ago
My bullshit detector is sounding again.
This guy sounds like he's telling a lie.
These staged witnesses describe the little unusual details as if it's scripted, not the usual memories one recalls from such a shocking event, based on emotion.
Also strange he mentions that it was definately not a "ahh learjet or ahh ahh smaller jet ".
Kranski4 2 years ago
BY THE WAY... Isn't it funny how random security cameras from a pier on the Hudson River can capture footage of flight 1549 crash landing (Jan.16 2009)... yet, the pentagon (the most secured building in the world, with hundreds of security camera's surrounding the building) cannot so much as catch a glimpse of an aircraft hitting the pentagon! Once again... BULL SHIT!
Tank122 3 years ago
I've been interviewed by news reporters a few times, and since when do you see a reporter look away from the person they are interviewing? they don't! they pay full attention because they are trying to get info! it's like she already knew what he was going to say (notice how she's nodding once he starts describing the plane, as if they practiced ahead of time) and of course he's affiliated with the media (USA Today). total and complete BULL SHIT! WAKE UP PEOPLE!
Tank122 3 years ago
Notice the interviewers look on her face when Joel says it was a 757. It is at 0:37 seconds into the clip. A little bit of a distressed look on her face. What do you think?
guildandepi 3 years ago
Possibly the control room telling her to stop moving her head to the beat of his scripted dialog.
JimmyDildo 2 years ago
Joel Sucherman could NOT see the Pentagon where he was stuck in traffic.
757 does not make a sonic boom.
Could be north of Citgo.
Another plane to the southwest, makes a beeline straight into the sky??? But there was no "second" plane. This must be the north of Citgo plane that didn't crash into the Pentagon.
A new investigation is needed.
wakenbake22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i guess he must be on bush's payroll too hahha moron twooftards
mattfactsof911 3 years ago
Total And Complete Lie! He saw no body nor tail, This man is lying on the news. Look at the pictures of the pentagon...Immediately after the "Supposed" Giant Airplane hit the pentagon there was only a 16 foot wide hole in the side of the pentagon. The windows above the hole were completely intact and undamaged..However live news footage also shows witnesses reporting secondary explosions comming from the pentagon long after the "Supposed" Plane hit it.
videocircus 3 years ago