@Ultradumbass, I said the amount of coke correspond with the "registered" prisonners who have died (natural cause). There is NO delivery of the amount of coke necessary to cremate the claimed millions of unregistered and supposedly gazed jews. There are neither any physical evidence of those claimed bodies. Not even a single tooth stained with cyanide (still present today on the walls of delousing chambers).
Of course he is right. Like he said, the germans kept very detailed reports on everything. The reports on the amount of coke delivered for the crematoriums are precise and complete in the archives of Aushwitz museum. That amount corresponds exactly with the deaths of the registered prisonners. If they did not cremate those millions of gazed people, then where are all those bodies ?
@acabramzack maybe the bodies never existed? do you have evidence that indicates 6 million jews died, or are you just going by blind faith and going with the majority which is very slowly turning into the minority? because i don't know if you've noticed but revisionism has been growing by about 1% every few years for the last 30 years.
@ultradumbass , I said the amount of coke correspond with the "registered" prisonners who have died (natural cause). There is NO delivery of the amount of coke necessary to cremate the claimed millions of unregistered and supposedly gazed jews. There are neither any physical evidence of those claimed bodies. Not even a single tooth stained with cyanide (still present today on the walls of delousing chambers).
His focus is always on Auschwitz and the Reinhard camps , his alternative views have never stood up to expert examination and his ideas have always been shown to be flawed.
Omission and distortion are his chief tools.
He is not a historian , no more than you or I are , nor has he expert knowledge.
kitchen talk is what it amounts to , the words of a fireside historian .
Faurisson looks sincere in his will to discover the truth about the gas chambers. But he claims that there has never been a plan nor a desire to exterminate. A hisorian like him certainly knows about the Wanssee conference, or Himmler's very explicit speech in Posen on 4th oct 1943... Also, he never talks about the terrible killing operations of the Einzatsgruppe. He makes no mention on documents burried by the deported and found after the war to match Hoess's testimony. Is he really honest???
At one point or another, he does discuss all those things. This wasn't a lecture about everything he has studied, and he studied much more since that talk in 1984.
Yes! He discusses all those things. By now I became pretty familiar with Faurisson, thanks to youtube. And my conclusion is that he is a very stubborn man. If one day he decides that the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not happen, and puts all his energy in making research accordingly ("tecnically impossible" etc.), he may find a few thousand, many even a few hundred thousand people to believe him.
@warmperson2007 A lot of those documents are bogus. Also, don't be so quick to point the finger at the Germans regarding the so-called atrocities on the Eastern front. Look up something called order no. 0428, Stalin's torch-men order. It basically orders Soviet troops to go behind enemy lines dressed in looted SS uniforms and commit atrocities against civilians and blame them on the Germans, as well as promote partisan violence and the use of scorched earth tactics.
@Ultradumbass, I said the amount of coke correspond with the "registered" prisonners who have died (natural cause). There is NO delivery of the amount of coke necessary to cremate the claimed millions of unregistered and supposedly gazed jews. There are neither any physical evidence of those claimed bodies. Not even a single tooth stained with cyanide (still present today on the walls of delousing chambers).
acabramzach 1 year ago
Of course he is right. Like he said, the germans kept very detailed reports on everything. The reports on the amount of coke delivered for the crematoriums are precise and complete in the archives of Aushwitz museum. That amount corresponds exactly with the deaths of the registered prisonners. If they did not cremate those millions of gazed people, then where are all those bodies ?
acabramzack 3 years ago
@acabramzack maybe the bodies never existed? do you have evidence that indicates 6 million jews died, or are you just going by blind faith and going with the majority which is very slowly turning into the minority? because i don't know if you've noticed but revisionism has been growing by about 1% every few years for the last 30 years.
ultradumbass 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ultradumbass , I said the amount of coke correspond with the "registered" prisonners who have died (natural cause). There is NO delivery of the amount of coke necessary to cremate the claimed millions of unregistered and supposedly gazed jews. There are neither any physical evidence of those claimed bodies. Not even a single tooth stained with cyanide (still present today on the walls of delousing chambers).
acabramzach 1 year ago
enculéééééééééééééééééééééééééééééé
Psykopat357 3 years ago
He is not honest as his track record shows.
His focus is always on Auschwitz and the Reinhard camps , his alternative views have never stood up to expert examination and his ideas have always been shown to be flawed.
Omission and distortion are his chief tools.
He is not a historian , no more than you or I are , nor has he expert knowledge.
kitchen talk is what it amounts to , the words of a fireside historian .
behblc 3 years ago
Faurisson looks sincere in his will to discover the truth about the gas chambers. But he claims that there has never been a plan nor a desire to exterminate. A hisorian like him certainly knows about the Wanssee conference, or Himmler's very explicit speech in Posen on 4th oct 1943... Also, he never talks about the terrible killing operations of the Einzatsgruppe. He makes no mention on documents burried by the deported and found after the war to match Hoess's testimony. Is he really honest???
warmperson2007 4 years ago
At one point or another, he does discuss all those things. This wasn't a lecture about everything he has studied, and he studied much more since that talk in 1984.
RevisionistsRus 4 years ago
Yes! He discusses all those things. By now I became pretty familiar with Faurisson, thanks to youtube. And my conclusion is that he is a very stubborn man. If one day he decides that the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not happen, and puts all his energy in making research accordingly ("tecnically impossible" etc.), he may find a few thousand, many even a few hundred thousand people to believe him.
warmperson2007 4 years ago
@warmperson2007 A lot of those documents are bogus. Also, don't be so quick to point the finger at the Germans regarding the so-called atrocities on the Eastern front. Look up something called order no. 0428, Stalin's torch-men order. It basically orders Soviet troops to go behind enemy lines dressed in looted SS uniforms and commit atrocities against civilians and blame them on the Germans, as well as promote partisan violence and the use of scorched earth tactics.
Spjungen 1 week ago