I've read about this thought experiment. It assumes that the observer outside the train can "see" the light pulse. They can't because it never entered their eyes or instruments. This thought experiment is pure madness.
Prove time exists as a physical part of the universe before you say it exists. Only insane people believe it is possible to get something from nothing.
Matter, Gravity, Energy, Motion, Heat, Cold,
Light, Electricity, Radiation, Magnetic Fields, Sound, Wind etc all have to come from something somewhere.
They all come from the same place from the same thing. The place and thing is the so called "nothing" or "empty space".
At what speed would the spacecraft be traveling according to the observer? If the answer is C, would the observer see the spacecraft and light traveling at the same speed?
I started watching this and thought my winamp or some background youtube video started playing Aphex Twin, so before I continue watching your video, I commend you on your musical taste, Sir.
PS: the music in the middle was a bit of a practical joke. I do hope that the formula on the screen at that time gave you more of a shock than the music ;)
As for the light-clock, this is a thought-experiment, the predictions it makes (the formula) have been verified and form the basis of our current understanding of the physical world. It's called ''special'' because it only talks about a special circumstance (no gravity, just light). It's a thought experiment that is at the beginning of the relativity theory, the one that changed our perspective forever. It's the early incarnation of the idea, not the finished product.
The argument that ''this doesn't work with a mechanical clock'' is irrelevant, because special relativity doesn't describe such an occurance. SRT only deals with light, and not with gravity. A mechanical clock does undergoe time dilation, but this can only be explained by the bending of space-time due to gravity, in general relativity.
PS: the mechanical clock does suffer time-dilation, just like anything else. To say that it doesn't breaks every aspect of relativity.
The triangle in the moving clock is caused by the observer standing still, while the clock is moving past you at speed (v). To an observer in the train, point A and C are at the same location, to the person on the ground, they are apart. It's not about the angle, but about the the fact that to the observer the distance by the light traveled in the same time seems bigger (because of the forward speed) than to the observer in the train. the dilation effect.
i no smartie!! :'( why am i watching this? coz i thought i was smart. gee..i'm 17 almost 18 do i am considered as stupid for not understanding this? they never taught me this in school though. the highest level i learn in physics is e=mc2.
again with the light clock... show me with a clock that has gears and a battery... simply isn't true the instrument is flawed and cannot measure time accurately in motion without calibration, doesn't mean time actually passes slower jeez, you know how many gullible people actually believe this nonsense...
@alcolyte76 omg are you saying you dont accept time dilation they have tested it with atomic clocks, yes that means calibrated, in earths orbit at fast speeds that would produce time dilated effects, and it did so they proved time dilation..they also measure the redshift of light particularly light during an eclipse to show the light of the sun moved when the effects of the moons gravitational feild moved, proving relativity again and again
@420dankykush atomic clocks have the same issue... try showing it with a MECHANICAL clock... isn't going to happen... because it DOESN'T happen with a mechanical clock lmmfao
@alcolyte76 im sure every educated person agrees when i say you need to do your homework and learn some things about the physical principles keeping you alive before you feel like preaching about them so ignorantly :D ;d sorry for sounding stern buddy cya
@420dankykush lmao you act like you know me... I have passed the highest college math classes offered, I have a masters in electrical and you think I don't understand the physics? I understand what he is saying but I disagree with him, just like matter can travel faster than the speed light... is being proven wrong in our time maybe you should lay off the kush and think a little harder about it
@420dankykush stand by it all you want pothead.... doesnt make it true... many stand by evilution too even though it has been disproven over and over and... over lmao I personally believe in science not science fiction...
@alcolyte76 you ignorant twit thats what you are sir i am standing by it along with facts and logical ppl, not standing alone like those who cant accept transcedental truths like evolution and time dilation, who are you and who do you think you are for confusing these users with your nonsense? stop throwing everybody off, stop advertising your science-run-a-muck, you take some good education and you taint it with your misconception, its so sad
A few years ago two parents went out for dinner. A few hours later, the babysitter was calling to see if she could cover up the clown statue in the kids' room, the father said "Get the kids and get out of the house, we'll call the police, we don't have a clown statue". The "clown statue" was actually a killer that escaped from jail. If you don't post this on 10 videos tonight the clown will be in your bed at 3:00am with a chainsaw in his hand just don't want this to happen
without even sayin that you might start seen the basic compositions of light, to me light is a bunch of small lil dots put in a wave formation like and they all are not connected but rather everytime a light beam is created or made it takes the momentum and the enery to sustain it to create a reaction at a smallest level but noticeable enough to feel its pressence, why wavy traveling is better? i always see my surroundings as if was a less dense water everywhere same rules and techniques
if light has a starting piont and an end point and if you travel right by its side at the same speed all you are gonna see is star like shimerigs as light cannota reflect and go back to your eyes since you both passed every point light could reflect. time dilation is another proof that light goes fast but not fst enought to be cought at the moment of its starting point by the observer, in other words is like an echoe that has not yet gatten to the point of absorbtion and reflect of itself.
The math aside can you explain how this beam of light that is already traveling up & down between these two mirrors at the light constant of 186k p/s, could move in a forward direction at any speed with out breaking that constant.....Ok just a pinch of math...the 186k traveling between the mirror + the velocity of the train = greater than 186k ( my A to my Q would be if the train was moving at 6k p/s then the light beam between the two mirrors slows to 180k ) is that the solution to my dilemma?
So you have an equation (at 3:38), you have the square root of [ Lo^2+(vDt/2)^2) ], when you're squaring both sides (to get rid of the sqrt) why aren't you applying newton's binom formula? (a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab+ b^2
relativity is bullshit, it comes down to perception. You might be able to fit a lot into 1 second, but time is constantly irrelevant, distance is the only thing that changes.
- it is possible to criticize paradigms such as the Michelson and Morley experiment, the relativity of simultaneity thought experiment and the light clock
- search at YouTube using those 5 keywords in a row : michelson morley critique
- the video explains the flaws and introduces a detailed website discussing those flaws in these paradigms
your video completely trashes itself when you crank the volume of the head banger music. It was all I could do to drop the web page before everyone in the room was screaming.
Free energy has been here all along ,But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
You see - he's using physics notation that is covered in high school and classic mechanics - you also go through these things in Calculus. When you talk about things like "Delta T and Delta X" - people without a background in basic physics or calculus won't have a clue what you're talking about. You clearly need more than high school math to understand SR. Anyone who actually understands SR would know this.
Eimstein is the most famous fraudulent scientist in the history of science. Relativity theory is completely false. But it defends the law of energy conservation against the truth, so the fuel/energy complex promoted relativity theory to the rank of the most famous physical theory. (They are afraid of the perpetual motion machine of the first kind - properly so, it is possible). If you want to see a proof that relativity theory is false, send me an e-mail - my e-mail address is in my contact box.
always find it humorous when people explain relativity or quantum mechanics on the youtube comment section.
The truth is that the mathematics and physics involved in these are staggering beyond belief and that the person explaining it is usually regurgitating a layman's explanation they saw on TV.
Even with a Ph.D in quantum optics and mechanics, one has trouble making sense of the material -- let alone explaining it.
You need to differentiate between special and general relativity. Special relativity (as explained in this vid) uses no more than logic and high school math. The calculation in the vid is the same one you'll be taught in a physics course. The math behind special relativity is so easy that it makes an excellent subject for a youtube video, because you don't need a PhD to understand it. In short, special can be outlined in a youtube vid, general requires 5 years of studying ;)
@Nidhogg05 lol - so that's why SR is taught to second and third year University students studying engineering and physics. Because you don't need a basic foundation in classical mechanics after all - you just need basic high school math! Because they teach you all about the notation used in physics in just a basic algebra course, right? You should automatically understand everything even though you LEFT OUT two dimensions regarding SR. You need a background in classical mechanics and GR befor SR
The maths involved is not as simple as you believe. I've so far done my GCSE, A level and currently a degree in Maths with a Minor in Physics and I'm still struggling to understand the concept, seeing as the need is not for logical thinking, but for the ability to completely forget any logic involved for the first few times going through it.
After that it seems to make up it's own logic that you simply continue to believe, in the hope that eventually it makes sense...........
The maths involved is not as simple as you believe. I've so far done my GCSE, A level and currently a degree in Maths with a Minor in Physics and I'm still struggling to understand the concept, seeing as the need is not for logical thinking, but for the ability to completely forget any logic involved for the first few times going through it.
After that it seems to make up it's own logic that you simply continue to believe, in the hope that eventually it makes sense...........
@Nidhogg05 u re absolutely rigth about -no more than high school math.i tried to understand that time dilation formula from wikipedia relavistic equations and i got it haha i was surprised how much easy it was but after that easy triangle equation i realised human brain is not that special on thinking about time ,probably many other things too.i didnt want to die without understanding it .im happy now:)
@MrMillsms My guess you treat anything relating to physics with a kind of awe. At least that is the impression I get from a comment you made in some Kaku video. I assure you that there is no need. Nidhogg is right. The truth behind special relativity can be sufficiently explained in one small video.
In the classic falling elevator experiment. A person jumping just before a falling elevator hits the ground, Could this person live if they jumped a few mph slower in the opposite direction then the falling elevator?
at 3:56 i cant see how you got rid of the two in v delta T over 2 all squard, for it to be - V delta T all squard. :( it's the one part i cant understand, can you help me please?
humans have an idea of what time is . and true physics doesnt because in e=mc2 states time doesnt exist .. it simply spacetime . one word we only perceive it as time because as u travel through space the adams in our bodies take longer to move from space to space aslwell as everything we make such as clocks ... wich let us perceive "time" quite literally going slower
@heyafro: You are an idiot. You spell like a 3rd grader. Adams? No. Adam is a person's name. You mean to say atom. And you do a poor job of explaining anything.
hey I'm sorry to bother you again but I can't find the song.
I should have said that I'm talking about the piano music that kicks in from 3.12 to the end, it's just amazing and sticks in my head but I've looked & looked & it's not in any version of the Aphex Twin song that I've found.
Woud you mind letting me know the name of that piano piece?
Thanks again & thanks for the video, hopefully you'll do a GR video someday for all of us who strive towards hyperbolic geometreyness :p
xlightwavex, I'm explicitly leaving out gravity and acceleration because this is a movie about special relativity, I might make one about general relativity later.
Ackreti, I might make a video on that someday, but I would fit it in with general relativity.
at exactly 5 minutes, you say the effect has been experimentally proven, Can you provide me with some information on the experiment? I have been looking for it and have had no success.
I've read about this thought experiment. It assumes that the observer outside the train can "see" the light pulse. They can't because it never entered their eyes or instruments. This thought experiment is pure madness.
WhosYourDaddy82 1 week ago
Prove time exists as a physical part of the universe before you say it exists. Only insane people believe it is possible to get something from nothing.
Matter, Gravity, Energy, Motion, Heat, Cold,
Light, Electricity, Radiation, Magnetic Fields, Sound, Wind etc all have to come from something somewhere.
They all come from the same place from the same thing. The place and thing is the so called "nothing" or "empty space".
bridgetroll9 1 week ago
At what speed would the spacecraft be traveling according to the observer? If the answer is C, would the observer see the spacecraft and light traveling at the same speed?
MiskenTheCat 3 weeks ago
I started watching this and thought my winamp or some background youtube video started playing Aphex Twin, so before I continue watching your video, I commend you on your musical taste, Sir.
schr4nz 3 weeks ago
PS: the music in the middle was a bit of a practical joke. I do hope that the formula on the screen at that time gave you more of a shock than the music ;)
Nidhogg05 1 month ago
@Nidhogg05 Yeah, the porn music needs to go. I just can't watch this.
Nothing personal.
cybervoid 1 month ago
@cybervoid it's aphex twin, aphex twin is possibly the best (or at least most influential) electronic musician of our time.
schr4nz 3 weeks ago
final
As for the light-clock, this is a thought-experiment, the predictions it makes (the formula) have been verified and form the basis of our current understanding of the physical world. It's called ''special'' because it only talks about a special circumstance (no gravity, just light). It's a thought experiment that is at the beginning of the relativity theory, the one that changed our perspective forever. It's the early incarnation of the idea, not the finished product.
Nidhogg05 1 month ago
The argument that ''this doesn't work with a mechanical clock'' is irrelevant, because special relativity doesn't describe such an occurance. SRT only deals with light, and not with gravity. A mechanical clock does undergoe time dilation, but this can only be explained by the bending of space-time due to gravity, in general relativity.
PS: the mechanical clock does suffer time-dilation, just like anything else. To say that it doesn't breaks every aspect of relativity.
Nidhogg05 1 month ago
To react to a few common questions: 1
The triangle in the moving clock is caused by the observer standing still, while the clock is moving past you at speed (v). To an observer in the train, point A and C are at the same location, to the person on the ground, they are apart. It's not about the angle, but about the the fact that to the observer the distance by the light traveled in the same time seems bigger (because of the forward speed) than to the observer in the train. the dilation effect.
Nidhogg05 1 month ago
why is this Video have BULLSHIT MUSIC put to it ?
Velvet4U 1 month ago
what is that last pianosong?
Jipzorowns 2 months ago
yeah i guess i'm not a smartie either :(
avogadrois420 2 months ago
i no smartie!! :'( why am i watching this? coz i thought i was smart. gee..i'm 17 almost 18 do i am considered as stupid for not understanding this? they never taught me this in school though. the highest level i learn in physics is e=mc2.
Calamistrate 2 months ago
Found this video quite helpful, compared to others.
daydreamer0606 3 months ago
shouldn't they add the speed of earth rotation and galaxy movement as well?
KaKaGaNu 3 months ago
again with the light clock... show me with a clock that has gears and a battery... simply isn't true the instrument is flawed and cannot measure time accurately in motion without calibration, doesn't mean time actually passes slower jeez, you know how many gullible people actually believe this nonsense...
alcolyte76 3 months ago
@alcolyte76 omg are you saying you dont accept time dilation they have tested it with atomic clocks, yes that means calibrated, in earths orbit at fast speeds that would produce time dilated effects, and it did so they proved time dilation..they also measure the redshift of light particularly light during an eclipse to show the light of the sun moved when the effects of the moons gravitational feild moved, proving relativity again and again
420dankykush 2 months ago
@420dankykush atomic clocks have the same issue... try showing it with a MECHANICAL clock... isn't going to happen... because it DOESN'T happen with a mechanical clock lmmfao
alcolyte76 2 months ago
@alcolyte76 im sure every educated person agrees when i say you need to do your homework and learn some things about the physical principles keeping you alive before you feel like preaching about them so ignorantly :D ;d sorry for sounding stern buddy cya
420dankykush 2 months ago
@420dankykush lmao you act like you know me... I have passed the highest college math classes offered, I have a masters in electrical and you think I don't understand the physics? I understand what he is saying but I disagree with him, just like matter can travel faster than the speed light... is being proven wrong in our time maybe you should lay off the kush and think a little harder about it
alcolyte76 1 month ago
@alcolyte76 i stand by my statement what i say is final boy you lieing feind of run a muck piss
420dankykush 1 month ago
@420dankykush stand by it all you want pothead.... doesnt make it true... many stand by evilution too even though it has been disproven over and over and... over lmao I personally believe in science not science fiction...
alcolyte76 1 month ago
@alcolyte76 you ignorant twit thats what you are sir i am standing by it along with facts and logical ppl, not standing alone like those who cant accept transcedental truths like evolution and time dilation, who are you and who do you think you are for confusing these users with your nonsense? stop throwing everybody off, stop advertising your science-run-a-muck, you take some good education and you taint it with your misconception, its so sad
420dankykush 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A few years ago two parents went out for dinner. A few hours later, the babysitter was calling to see if she could cover up the clown statue in the kids' room, the father said "Get the kids and get out of the house, we'll call the police, we don't have a clown statue". The "clown statue" was actually a killer that escaped from jail. If you don't post this on 10 videos tonight the clown will be in your bed at 3:00am with a chainsaw in his hand just don't want this to happen
yami7598 5 months ago
without even sayin that you might start seen the basic compositions of light, to me light is a bunch of small lil dots put in a wave formation like and they all are not connected but rather everytime a light beam is created or made it takes the momentum and the enery to sustain it to create a reaction at a smallest level but noticeable enough to feel its pressence, why wavy traveling is better? i always see my surroundings as if was a less dense water everywhere same rules and techniques
chukaz1 5 months ago
if light has a starting piont and an end point and if you travel right by its side at the same speed all you are gonna see is star like shimerigs as light cannota reflect and go back to your eyes since you both passed every point light could reflect. time dilation is another proof that light goes fast but not fst enought to be cought at the moment of its starting point by the observer, in other words is like an echoe that has not yet gatten to the point of absorbtion and reflect of itself.
chukaz1 5 months ago
idk, i always figured that this was more-so a physics paradox, just as
1=sqrt1=sqrt[(-1)(-1)]=sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1)=(i)(i)=-1
is a mathmatical paradox.
gerbils4 6 months ago
@gerbils4 .. no .. its just that you made a mistake. Your own errors are not paradoxes.
MrRonslow 3 months ago
@MrRonslow care to explain my mistake?
gerbils4 1 month ago
Im sooooooooooooooooo confused!!!!!!!!!!!!!! great explanation but I haven't even began algebra yet
rasibz 8 months ago
great vid
coolweather100 9 months ago
You don't have to add annoying music to make your videos more interesting
Quinzio 10 months ago
Theory of relativity and shitty ass music don't mix.
salehjoon 10 months ago
thumbs up for FLIM : )
polarysekt 11 months ago
FLIM!!!!
TheFaceOfJohnPants 1 year ago
The math aside can you explain how this beam of light that is already traveling up & down between these two mirrors at the light constant of 186k p/s, could move in a forward direction at any speed with out breaking that constant.....Ok just a pinch of math...the 186k traveling between the mirror + the velocity of the train = greater than 186k ( my A to my Q would be if the train was moving at 6k p/s then the light beam between the two mirrors slows to 180k ) is that the solution to my dilemma?
zarzandar 1 year ago
So you have an equation (at 3:38), you have the square root of [ Lo^2+(vDt/2)^2) ], when you're squaring both sides (to get rid of the sqrt) why aren't you applying newton's binom formula? (a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab+ b^2
teahousemoon 1 year ago
relativity is bullshit, it comes down to perception. You might be able to fit a lot into 1 second, but time is constantly irrelevant, distance is the only thing that changes.
1mph or 186000mph thats it. fuck the THEORY
ExplodingGing 1 year ago
it's nice but when it goes to 4:30 i thought the video is just a joke :O
jjjjcccjjf 1 year ago
- it is possible to criticize paradigms such as the Michelson and Morley experiment, the relativity of simultaneity thought experiment and the light clock
- search at YouTube using those 5 keywords in a row : michelson morley critique
- the video explains the flaws and introduces a detailed website discussing those flaws in these paradigms
ebrauns789 1 year ago
I havn't got time for this
breaneainn 1 year ago
you give completely wrong theory
MrViksitgaur 1 year ago
your video completely trashes itself when you crank the volume of the head banger music. It was all I could do to drop the web page before everyone in the room was screaming.
Cyberdactyl 1 year ago
@Cyberdactyl it was a bit of practical joke from my side ;)
Nidhogg05 1 month ago
Comment removed
mdeiulio 1 year ago
man, at 4.30 i was laughing very hard XD
viktorgoa 1 year ago
As soon as you set your "Light clock" in motion it needed recalibrating. Time did not change, your clock did. What ever happened to a good old Rolex.
dalli2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here all along ,But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
polysemousncrk 1 year ago
You see - he's using physics notation that is covered in high school and classic mechanics - you also go through these things in Calculus. When you talk about things like "Delta T and Delta X" - people without a background in basic physics or calculus won't have a clue what you're talking about. You clearly need more than high school math to understand SR. Anyone who actually understands SR would know this.
metalmike83 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Eimstein is the most famous fraudulent scientist in the history of science. Relativity theory is completely false. But it defends the law of energy conservation against the truth, so the fuel/energy complex promoted relativity theory to the rank of the most famous physical theory. (They are afraid of the perpetual motion machine of the first kind - properly so, it is possible). If you want to see a proof that relativity theory is false, send me an e-mail - my e-mail address is in my contact box.
henrykay01 1 year ago
always find it humorous when people explain relativity or quantum mechanics on the youtube comment section.
The truth is that the mathematics and physics involved in these are staggering beyond belief and that the person explaining it is usually regurgitating a layman's explanation they saw on TV.
Even with a Ph.D in quantum optics and mechanics, one has trouble making sense of the material -- let alone explaining it.
At least I find this to be the case in my life
MrMillsms 1 year ago 10
@MrMillsms
You need to differentiate between special and general relativity. Special relativity (as explained in this vid) uses no more than logic and high school math. The calculation in the vid is the same one you'll be taught in a physics course. The math behind special relativity is so easy that it makes an excellent subject for a youtube video, because you don't need a PhD to understand it. In short, special can be outlined in a youtube vid, general requires 5 years of studying ;)
Nidhogg05 1 year ago 12
@Nidhogg05
Yes, I should have said General Relativity.
MrMillsms 1 year ago
@Nidhogg05 lol - so that's why SR is taught to second and third year University students studying engineering and physics. Because you don't need a basic foundation in classical mechanics after all - you just need basic high school math! Because they teach you all about the notation used in physics in just a basic algebra course, right? You should automatically understand everything even though you LEFT OUT two dimensions regarding SR. You need a background in classical mechanics and GR befor SR
metalmike83 1 year ago
@Nidhogg05
The maths involved is not as simple as you believe. I've so far done my GCSE, A level and currently a degree in Maths with a Minor in Physics and I'm still struggling to understand the concept, seeing as the need is not for logical thinking, but for the ability to completely forget any logic involved for the first few times going through it.
After that it seems to make up it's own logic that you simply continue to believe, in the hope that eventually it makes sense...........
roseofthebrook 1 year ago
@Nidhogg05
The maths involved is not as simple as you believe. I've so far done my GCSE, A level and currently a degree in Maths with a Minor in Physics and I'm still struggling to understand the concept, seeing as the need is not for logical thinking, but for the ability to completely forget any logic involved for the first few times going through it.
After that it seems to make up it's own logic that you simply continue to believe, in the hope that eventually it makes sense...........
roseofthebrook 1 year ago
@Nidhogg05 u re absolutely rigth about -no more than high school math.i tried to understand that time dilation formula from wikipedia relavistic equations and i got it haha i was surprised how much easy it was but after that easy triangle equation i realised human brain is not that special on thinking about time ,probably many other things too.i didnt want to die without understanding it .im happy now:)
esraretin 10 months ago
@MrMillsms My guess you treat anything relating to physics with a kind of awe. At least that is the impression I get from a comment you made in some Kaku video. I assure you that there is no need. Nidhogg is right. The truth behind special relativity can be sufficiently explained in one small video.
dsbnh 1 year ago
In the classic falling elevator experiment. A person jumping just before a falling elevator hits the ground, Could this person live if they jumped a few mph slower in the opposite direction then the falling elevator?
aStrayforMyTime 1 year ago
at 3:56 i cant see how you got rid of the two in v delta T over 2 all squard, for it to be - V delta T all squard. :( it's the one part i cant understand, can you help me please?
Runalotski 1 year ago
Comment removed
Rachman1337 1 year ago
Comment removed
Rachman1337 1 year ago
Comment removed
Rachman1337 1 year ago
Great ! Tks. Now i got it.
jaespino60 1 year ago
5 stars for sure. Too bad you cant star videos nowadays, so i'll just 'like' :P
sourav777 1 year ago
Beautiful!
tubetib 1 year ago
humans have an idea of what time is . and true physics doesnt because in e=mc2 states time doesnt exist .. it simply spacetime . one word we only perceive it as time because as u travel through space the adams in our bodies take longer to move from space to space aslwell as everything we make such as clocks ... wich let us perceive "time" quite literally going slower
heyafro 2 years ago
@heyafro: You are an idiot. You spell like a 3rd grader. Adams? No. Adam is a person's name. You mean to say atom. And you do a poor job of explaining anything.
ChowderDingus 1 year ago
@heyafro
>adams
Rachman1337 1 year ago
It is odd we have time dilation but in physics we have no understanding of what time is.
nickharvey7 2 years ago
What is the name of that piano song?
I've searched Deftones & Aphex Twin but I can't find that song, is there an actual name for it or is it yours?
If it is it's good & I'd like an mp3 of it :)
I'll check back soon, hopefully you'll comment :)
sponsoredwalk1 2 years ago
@sponsoredwalk1
Aphex Twin - Flim
Nidhogg05 2 years ago
hey I'm sorry to bother you again but I can't find the song.
I should have said that I'm talking about the piano music that kicks in from 3.12 to the end, it's just amazing and sticks in my head but I've looked & looked & it's not in any version of the Aphex Twin song that I've found.
Woud you mind letting me know the name of that piano piece?
Thanks again & thanks for the video, hopefully you'll do a GR video someday for all of us who strive towards hyperbolic geometreyness :p
sponsoredwalk1 2 years ago
@sponsoredwalk1
Im sorry, i forgot i put in another song, it's also by Aphex Twin, called "Avril 14th"
Nidhogg05 1 year ago
Amazing, thank you :)
sponsoredwalk1 1 year ago
well explained.
pradeepsrinu 2 years ago
Nice!
Okamok 2 years ago
Thank you. More please!!!
mrstarstuff 2 years ago
Enjoyed the video. .Getting to listen music was a Surprise!!
Especially the first song. Film by Aphex Twin
I wonder how popular that song became. I can recognize it, but whom else?
btwbrand 2 years ago
Instantly I did. But I love AT..
unrescued 2 years ago
xlightwavex, I'm explicitly leaving out gravity and acceleration because this is a movie about special relativity, I might make one about general relativity later.
Ackreti, I might make a video on that someday, but I would fit it in with general relativity.
Nidhogg05 2 years ago
this is the explaination for simultaniety einstein explained gravity by the elevator example if you never had been in a elevator
if you push up you might feel like gravity is increaseing if you had no knowlege of the fact that it was actually moving upwards
that is litterally the bending of space time
which is no different when you accelorate or when you are introduced to a gravitaional feild
xlightwavex 2 years ago
You explain time dilation caused by speed. I would prefer gravitational time dilation explained....
Ackreti 2 years ago
on the first image of the moving clock is delta x the change in distance? And from what point to what point.
omgzpancakes 2 years ago
Crap.
harmonicgrunt 2 years ago
"delta" t is the "change" in time
Nidhogg05 2 years ago
What exactly is (delta)t'?
superdummy74 2 years ago
wow. That was a great vid. Really explained alot. I knew about time dilation but i dint understand why it happened.
Thank you. That was great for ur first video.
730rJoel 2 years ago
gah i was all set to 5 star this video when 4:30 rolled around.
oEQjet 2 years ago 10
@oEQjet *sigh* back when there was stars. :(
gredangeo 5 months ago
at exactly 5 minutes, you say the effect has been experimentally proven, Can you provide me with some information on the experiment? I have been looking for it and have had no success.
mouser58907 3 years ago
It's called the Hafele-Keating experiment, look it up on wiki or google it :)
It's the experiment with the clocks on the planes.
Nidhogg05 3 years ago
:o
damn you and your lens flare!!
Nidhogg05 3 years ago
fairly impressive their Nid, but i have one piece of advice:
NEEDS MOAR LENZ FLAREZ!
Ruushian1095 3 years ago
Nice and easily understandable video explaining relativity and time dilation. Thank you.
senthzam 3 years ago
Great vid, i can't believe i followed most of that lol. Make another if u have the time
ranga4eva2 3 years ago