My research says the French have been far more adept at destroying and distorting ancient history than even the Brits. From Cambodia to Mauritania and everything in between. Anything religious is the first to be defaced. The simple fact is. It is not necessary to be Einstein to follow the money. From Roman times to current Rome. Their were GIANTS on the earth in those days. Men of old. Men of renown. The people that built the pyramids. were in fact. BIG people.
@saintron60 Then how do you account for the sheer lack of big dead people? Also why would they draw themselves being the same size as tiny cattle and ox?
@GeneralInsomnia Well if you look into the matter you will see that every time new bones show up. They vanish just as fast Follow the money. Here in the US many giants have been found only to be bought up, stolen or appropriated. Never to be seen again. By you and I that is.
@saintron60 One more thing to consider is. What became of the 20 plus thousand body's that have disappeared out to see after the tsunami in Japan? Its a pretty much given that Noah's flood happened. Someday who knows what will be found piled up in places like the Mariana Trench.
@saintron60 So you are saying there is a global conspiracy in every country in almost every profession where everyone of different ideological beliefs get together to hide evidence of giants? I'm 100% certain that would be the required conspiracy. Even if it was stolen someone would have wrote about it or recorded it there would even be 100s if not 1000s of whistle blowers if such a thing were true.
@GeneralInsomnia I am saying no such thing. It is my belief after doing some international travelling to site's like Angkor Wat in Cambodia. The various temples in Bangkok and others. Along with three years of serious Internet research. I have concluded that very large people have in fact inhabited this planet in the past. Where they came from you can decide. The fact that much effort and expense has gone into destroying that data can be attributed to certain religions. Get it?
@GeneralInsomnia I recommend you take two aspirin. Get a good nights sleep. And when you wake up. Ask yourself this question. Whose financial world gets rocked if they have to explain to their flock that the history they have been taught is not real. Giants are hard to explain. Ancient beings from other planets even harder. Cultures across this planet says those things were reality's. From the Old testament to the Hindu vedics, to the Sumerian Tablets. Sleep well. and happy holidays.
Actually I think it more likely because of the internal layout, along with the fact that when it was first built. its outside wall smooth as glass. Then add the water source below. You are left with a structure, capable of withstanding huge internal pressure, is also strong enough to support huge weight. Fill that box with magnesium turnings, Land ship atop. Fuel inlets aligned with air shafts. Dam the water. it meets the turnings, abra cadabra. now making hydrogen and oxy. Its a gas station.
If they were using counter weights, then they must lifting it at a certain height. How did they do that? Using sand as counter weight might be the answer but it seems difficult. Built a pyramid to prove your theory french man!!
@neerajmjj its simply because newtons idea that weight doesnt increase when connected (his stringing two stones together to see if speed increases) is blatantly incorrect. all they did was simply use the pyramid as a ramp, calculate double or tripple the amount of the weight of the object lifted, divide the larger blocks into smaller easily carried blocks, then tied each easily carried smaller using some sort of rope all of the smaller divided blocks to the stone block generating enough lift. .
@funkleman Maybe you are right but no one has been been to build a pyramid without using recent technologies. Actually doing it will convince me but a computer simulation does not convince me.
@neerajmjj then youll have to do it yourself, personaly I beilieve they used ramps and most likely had some sort of something used for rope. when you get that bitter even videodemonstrations wont work as people will complain its somehow faked lol.
@funkleman with respect, if you believe the Great Pyramid could be built like this then you really do not understand this subject. I've studied the building of this pyramid for 16 years now; I would suggest you watch an excellent video called "The Revelation Pyramids Full video 2011" watch?v=pQFrNbqNRxI as it is superb (I don't like the last 5 mins but the first 1.5 hours are superb! indeed they should be mind blowing if you don't know much about this subject!) Enjoy!
@LittleBabyBum with respect some sort of ramp had to have been used, it would have been too easy both to dammage the rope/lifting mechanism used (ropes were an egyptian invention) as well as dammage to both the monument and stone blocks used. I've seen a ton of nonsense ideas ranging to kooky to not well thought out. Actualy try something before mocking it, you can run all the theories in the world but the only way to impress your knowledge of pyramid building is actualy build one.
@funkleman to quote you "you can run all the theories in the world but the only way to impress your knowledge of pyramid building is actualy build one" - precisely. & it is this point that I feel you're missing. We cannot build the pyramid using modern techniques & equipment. Many experiments have been done in the past & all have failed miserably. It is impossible to build the pyramid using ANY known technique. & pls don't call me an idiot, I'm very well read on this topic. keep the debate civil
@neerajmjj tying the smaller blocks together that are easily carried individual equaled more than enough weight to lift. both sides of the pyramid were probably used as ramps with the larger amount of smaller blocks drapped over the side using some sort of rope. the pyramid itself was probably the positioning mechanism. brilliant and simple. You would need two or three times the weight of what you want to lift to do it, then divide the larger amount your using into smaller easier lifted blocks.
im tempted to make a computer animation of it, most likely they used heated tools to cut the stone as well. nothing alien about it, they just had a better knowledge of physics.
@neerajmjj ie. each smaller weight was tied individualy to the larger stone block is what i meant, the entire weight accelerating with enough lift towards the ground to lift the stone block easily while still being able to easily move the smaller blocks.
@iamjacobnz How do they push the counter weights up... Did they discover counter weights up there when they built it lol, or perhaps they just used more counter weights??
Anyone who wants to know what the true pyramids were really built for should read Chris Dunn's Giza power plant book. The pyramids were built to use harmonic resonance to create energy. Anyone who thinks that is nuts should think about this, you don't build a tomb and it just happens to end up being a perfect coupled oscillator with exactly the right frequencies created by the rock used. It had to be built for that purpose.
@k0smon More like 4500 years old. That's what the evidence shows. John West fails to convince re: the Great Sphynx, And Graham Hancock is just a total loon. When you find things in sealed passages that date to 2400 BC... well that's pretty conclusive. Let me know when you find something that dates to 10,500 BC.
Regarding the actual function of the Pyramids... I'll say that while I'm not an expert, I've always found the tomb hypothesis to be a bit creaky. But I'm not ready to venture a guess.
@sbergman27 ::: The 12500 years old comes from comparing the configuration of the stars in Orion's belt with the configuration of the pyramid complex. Also reference the rain damage done to the sphinx. What is your evidence for 4500? Also, name-calling is of no value. What is your problem with Hancock? What 'things' were found in what passages?
@k0smon This should help get you back on track: tinyurl . com / ey64f
Re: West, other geologists do not seem to be convinced by his arguments. And Re: Hancock, his "arguments" have been pretty thoroughly discredited. For example, his arguments based upon comparative mythology. Claiming that two disparate myths *must* be related because both mythological characters had white beards. I have an old copy of "Fingerprints of the Gods". He'a a good writer. I was impressed until I looked more closely,
@groendel Gotta get past Zahi Hawass first. I'm not sure what is required for that. Lubricating his palm with some mula? Promising him some personal publicity? Something less obvious? I don't know. But one thing's for sure... he's not on the up and up. He's playing some sort of game with the power he holds.
ummm... if its so easy then monsieur then please build one to prove your point. In case you hadn't noticed the stones are melted together, not even a paper can move between them. Also you didn't explain why the stones were caved in so that there is a curvature to the sides. And of course you're assuming it was a tomb when it was no such thing.
@bluelotuspetals It's not so easy but the method presented here is the easiest. With 100000 workers the pyramid can be built even more easily since the labor reserve pool is 25 times larger than proposed.
@stimsWonderland It would appear the reason Mark Lehner and the Japanese team from Nissan failed to reconstruct even miniature models of the Great Pyramid is that the required technique is beyond our technology, even today! Egyptologists still claim that all work has been done using primitive chisels and hammers, the Egyptians simply had plenty of time and plenty of slaves to do the job. What a lot of hooey this is. I want to see him try it, cause he won't even come close.
@bluelotuspetals Theory is such perfection can be obtained in a single generation. Human laborers had to be inside the pyramid building it from the inside out so a miniature would still be a grand project. The theory can't really be tested unless you feel like you are a rich person with lots of money and time to waste. Bottom line is that this is for archaeological research value, to sell books, tourism for the pyramids, and fame for another man.
I've never understood this bit. Slam any old rock onto the ground. Slam another one on top. Try to get a paper to slide between them. I just tried it. And my gods! I must be a Pharaoh!
@sbergman27 "The Great Pyramid consists of two million limestone blocks, has the height of a forty-story building and the width of two and a half football fields. The foundation of the pyramid is bedrock chiselled with a precision of only 2 centimetres off perfect level. Even today with all our technical know-how and laser precision craftsmanship according to specialists we are not able to build a structure like the Great Pyramid which such precision!"
I'm certainly not questioning the engineering accomplishment represented by the Great Pyramid. Just the silly "can't slide a sheet of paper between" metaphor. The precision is well established. But the oft-quoted example is not so good.
@sbergman27 We simply do not have the mechanical technology available to carve the stones that construct the pyramid with the precision that has been used! Also consider that these stones are so perfectly carved and the mortar joints are so terribly thin that you can’t even get a sheet of paper in between them! The mortar joints are terribly strong, far stronger that the mortar that we use nowadays. The stones seem more or less glued or fused together. Why can't you just admit to its greatness?
@bluelotuspetals "We do not have the mechanical technology available.."
Nonsense. If we had reason to construct a Great Pyramid, today, we could do it with an order of magnitude greater accuracy in 1/10th the time. What's impressive is that the ancient's did as well as they did, due to some very clever engineering & the determination of the Pharaohs. I've always imagined that if we could line up all their dried dicks in a row, Cheops' would be the shortest. Great Pyramid = The Ultimate Hummer.
I don't buy it!! First off "IT IS NOT A TOMB" Secondly if you would just look at the detailed info provided by the pre egyptian people, it shows they used a magnetic field to disrupt the gravitational field that also made the rock soft like styrafom.
It's the "B" field of a
They used four to five round magnets floating on a shaft, the magnets were spin and cause a disruptive magnetic field around the rocks that were then carved with copper tools that had a magnetic charge
@wb6iaq1 Your few sentences made more sense than this whole video. Just one question though..."In your opinion" only....How did the ancients achieve this knowledge? When I played with magnets on the ice box as a kid...I just never thought of building a pyramids with them. Don't get me wrong, I think this is closer than most peoples version...ramps/rollers/man-power/rock hammers is all a joke. I really don't care about the skin color of who built them, Just getting closer to the truth will work.
@wb6iaq1 Your few sentences made more sense than this whole video. Just one question though..."In your opinion" only....How did the ancients achieve this knowledge? When I played with magnets on the ice box as a kid...I just never thought of building a pyramids with them. Don't get me wrong, I think this is closer than most peoples version...ramps/rollers/man-power/rock hammers is all a joke. I really don't care about the skin color of who built them, Just getting closer to the truth will work.
@whales Since you brought up the Coral Castle, I guess you know that Edward what-ever his name was,always said he had the secrets as to how the pyramids were built...Even in sickness and near death, he never devulged those secrets.We all know how men aren't good keeper of secrets but this guy did. I question why and how he got this knowledge and found it important to keep it hush hush. I have my own theory but, it's out there.
It really does amaze me people are actually trying to figure out how to topple stones to make the same shape. There is also a project camelot vid where some guy talks about "the rulers" showing him things about electricity and the pyramids "that just make sense". Anyone who can't see this structure interacts with forces in a way and was built for that, I dunno what to say. It's like taking a parabolic mirror that melts steel and trying to figure out how to use it to check your lipstick...
Les Brown (not the motivational speaker) took the measurements (base is a square, each edge is 1.57 or half of pi X the height and from there you can figure out the side heights) and made a house out of wood. In this house he grew veggies of all kinds. Their yield was 3x as big and 3x as rapid as usual. There is a video where he shocked himself in the house 20ft and turned zinc to calcium with tetrahedron shapes. There are other vids with people experimenting on grass.
no...wrong...wrong ...wrong again...they want to answer one of the worlds greatest misteries with some technical gadgets and fancy 3-d images..NO !!!...WRONG..!!!
great video... im more interested in how they illuminated the inside onf the pyramid and how they got the walls perfectly in angle than how its build!
@zephranna01 maybe they will admit it when you learn how to spell words civilisation = civilization ...it even underlines misspellings man? However, maybe this was just a sarcastic post to get a thumbs up LOL!
@pacerodi Oh, yeah. Extraterrestrials with a technology advanced enough to transport a pyramid with an estimated weight of over six million metric tons like a toy, would have to build this pyramid out of millions of individually cut pieces of terrestrial rock material, which can be shown to be cut and carved that way with very primitive techniques. Yeah, sounds really reasonable.
@leungchaan I dont think the theory is that it was transported here by extra terrestrials, but they came here and supplied the mathematical and architectural know-how and technology to assist the Ancient Egyptian's in building the Pyramids.
@leungchaan The advanced technology was one that you even have potential to posses. It was build through thought form. The rocks are alive, they have a consciousness. You can read about this in the LAW OF ONE.
What if they DUG a hole in the ground and PUSHED the stones in?? After lots of erosion,, we get the illusion they were built OVER ground,, an underground tomb does make more sense doesn't it??
@Losermountain have you ever seen the pyramids man?! Thats like digging a massive hole bigger than a baseball stadium. They are fucking massive and are stacked really well :-) This theory (which I honestly haven't checked yet) seems very very likely. But who really knows... people still believe Jesus was the son of a God, and that's another crazy neverending debate. I just can't wait to die and wake up still connected to the Matrix!!!!
@aaron2414 more likely than levers and counterweights made of sticks and rope!! right?? they made a tomb and made a pyramid shape to make it easier to get to the BOTTOM,, like stairs,, lol @ the Matrix xD
@aaron2414 Dude...When you die, you get disconnected and flushed down the tube,your body is liguidated and then that in turn is fed to the live batteries...I mean humans that are still connected to the matrix. Damn! I thought everybody knew this shit!!! :)
@zephranna01 well said, nobody in his right mind can beleive that pyramids of this massive size which is hard to build even with todays technology, can be build by those who didnot even have means to lift 100 ton weight to that height.
@mustafa2001ali No! Because you can't figure out how someone can do something at a certain time of history doesn't mean anyone else can't. Our ancestors were not morons. We don't learn these simple ingenuous technologies based on beams and ropes because we are born in a civilization with cars and phones. But you can watch a man alone lifting a 16 tons stone this way: search "stonehenge reloaded" in youtube.
@zephranna01 all the civilisation what was built on the land of egypt were all egyptian by the hands of egyptians even if the civilisation's name was changed
@zephranna01 all the civilisation what was built on the land of egypt were all egyptian by the hands of egyptians even if the civilisation's name was changed
How were the stones carved at Pumapunku? , how did they bring stones this size to the altitudes of Macchu Picchu & Pumapunku? literally hundreds of questions. What happened to the remnants of the mountain peaks at Nazca? and Coral Castle? and why?
@zephranna01 LOL,I have news for you, you can, and you can watch a video where a single man does It is called "Man Moves Huge Blocks!" . Are you afraid to watch it because you would see what an ass you are? The largest blocks in the pyramid were 6 ft tall. You can watch Wally Wallington singlehandedly raise a 1600 lb block three feet by rocking it you MORON. Not only are you a MORON, but you are also a COWARD because you refuse to see something that will show that you are WRONG!!!
@zephranna01 If one watches the Youtube video "Man Moves Huge Blocks!" one can see one way how it could easily have been done, no magic needed.. This shows how with primitive tools they could have done it. The huge granite beams, once on site could be easily raised vertically as the pyramid rose. They did not need to drag them up a ramp from the Nile. They just repeatedly pivoted them! To raise them vertically they rocked them! MUCH easier, few men needed!!!!!
@zephranna01 If you watch "Man Moves Huge Blocks!" you will have to come to the conclusion that if the ancients saw anybody using Houdin's methods they would have doubled over in laughter. Teams of men dragging blocks? Huge counterweights? All one needs is some small rocks to place under the stone and then just a couple of men to move it. Sorry, no aliens, no microwave beams, no levitation. Of course using canals and lochs and floating the stones works beautifully too.
@zephranna01 You need to watch the youtube video "Building Stonehenge-This Man can Move anything". Basically one NEVER drags a heavy stone. Why would one when one can PIVOT it. A birds eye view of this would also look like the stone is being moved in a wobbly seesaw type action. U NEVER let the stone lay flat on the ground. You keep it on pivot stones. You pivot one corner forward. Place a new pivot stone in on the other side of the middle, then pivot the other side forward, repeat. No sliding
@zephranna01 . One keeps the beam on a ramp at all times. If the next level is only 2 feet high, and the level after the next is 5 ft high then one extends the ramp to a height of 7 ft. At a 45% angle the ramp face is 129 inches . One only needs to slide it HALF way up that height at which point the middle of the beam is at the upper edge, or apex of the ramp. The other side of the ramp could slope down. The giant beams could rise up in a seesaw fashion, with a slide between each see and saw.
@zephranna01 If one has the large beams on site at the beginning then one would not have to slide them very far each time a layer went up.If a granite beam is 34 feet then one only needs to slide it half way up a 34 ft ramp and then just stand on one end and then pivot it to an area already built up to that layer The large external ramp is totally not needed. One doesn't even need a 34 foot ramp for each at a level. One keeps a pivot stone under each granite beam....
@zephranna01 Wow, are you THAT thick? The levels of the pyramid are different heights. They range from about 6 ft to 2 feet. So when a 6 ft level was added they only had to raise one of the large blocks vertically 6 ft. When a 2 ft level was added they only had to raise the large blocks vertically 2 ft. They could use any number of methods such as using wedges to jack it up or having the blocks tied to rockers then rocked forward, shoving some stone shallow enough to fit then forward and repeat
He is wrong. His theory is not the only one that works. The very simple theory that the huge blocks were placed at the site of the future pyramid at the START of the construction, and then raised up as each level was built works BETTER! It does not require a ramp NOR a counterweight lifting mechanism!!! The pyramids are built with much less effort this way!!! He has been observant but made wrong assumptions. The grand gallery had a giant PISTON in it. This was a PUMP!
@zephranna01 You are a ridiculous person in that you ASSUME that you know which theory I believe and then try to criticize me for what I don't believe. At the same time YOU believe THIS ridiculous theory. Anyone with even the slightest common sense can see that all of his elaborate ramp and counterweight system was not necessary AT ALL. Why pile TONS of earth up and construct a dangerous counterweight system when one could put the blocks on site at the beginning. They'd rise with the pyramid.
@zephranna01 If you mean by an exterior ramp that goes all the way to the top then EVERYONE was taught that. If you assume I BELIEVE that then you are wrong and have made an ASS out of yourself. Why don't you ask what I believe before you jump to conclusions. What I also don't believe is that they build a massive ramp to the height of the King's chamber and a massive counterweight system when they didn't have to. They could have just had the granite blocks at the site from the start.
@zephranna01 You choose ignorance and declare it a virtue. You assume you know what I have been taught and what I believe. You are a simpleton and a fool.
The Great Pyramid was a pump as described by Edward Kunkel. One thing a pump needs is a safety release valve. This explains why the "air shafts" in the Queen's chamber were NOT continued to the inside. The blocks that covered these shafts did have the shaft carved into them only it stopped just an inch or so from the surface of the room. In the event that the Queen's chamber lost it's air cushion the pressure would burst through these last inches of limestone, saving the room from destruction.
@zephranna01 Houdin is just as silly. He still proposes a MASSIVE ramp solely for the purpose of getting the huge ceiling slabs of the King's Chamber up to height. None of that is necessary!!! They would only have had to have them at the site at the START of construction, then, as each level was built the granite slabs were raised a level. This would not have been difficult. They raise houses off their foundations by stacking timbers under them! To propose they ignored the easy way is idiotic!
@zephranna01 I have heard of Atlantis. The evidence to go by seems minimal but behind most stories there is some truth. I doubt many of the gaps in human history will ever be known. If the great library of Alexandria hadn't been toasted I can't imagine how much more we would know. There was a book written (cant remember by which greek guru) about the history of the earth which was lost. If you search "archeology news" or archaeologica its a good site updated daily.
@floatinginblue I don't believe for a second that the collective wisdom of the known world was destroyed in the Alexandria Library Fire. There are those that would like us to believe that. I for one don't. Ah if only I could be a fly on the wall, and able to freely roam around the rooms below the Vatican, and other like places in London, Wash. DC , and Paris.
@zephranna01 The knowledge could have come from a much older generation but the evidence points to and age of 2551-2472BC based on carbon dating. In saying that the first Egyptians would have been completely different to those who came years after. The question I think is where did the original people in Egypt come from with knowledge like that. It will be interesting to see the final discoveries of the latest queens shaft explorations.
@pepeelenatico well, the closer estimates are one stone cut and placed every 9 seconds. (even thought the stonesc came from 600 miles away in the aswan quarry.) and the heavist top stones are over 20 tons. and theres 2.5 million of them
@zephranna01 I totally agree with everything, but would like to share some info with you. The water didn't have to be there because of rain.. it came (could've come) from the pyramids being used as a pump to get water from the nile to everywhere else.
sentinelkennels . com/Research_Article_V41 . html
and watch this watch?v=CRv9cdG82bY&NR=1
it has a lot about water, pyramids, and ancient egypt
I don't understand your point. You slide the stones up the ramp to the level you are working on. Then you slide the stones horizontally, placing the furthest stones first. According to Oahspe , the ramp was 7 times as long as the level they were working on. so the angle would be ? (you do the math) They used capstans to assist the pulling.
@zephranna01 To say that “another civilisation build the pyramids”, it means you have not been to Egypt. Have a look at all the Valley of the Kings and all the incredible work that is there, not to mention the huge amount of treasures in the Egyptian museum in Cairo. The evident are everywhere in Egypt that the old Egyptian civilisation were far more advanced than we think it is. You need to see and judge it yourself not watched in a TV news.
@zephranna01 I understand what you are saying, but the one thing that is missing is the evidence for such a civilization, and yes I have heard many theories about a higher civilization before the Egyptians. There are many mysteries out there in the world that still need to be solved, but trying to say it was this or that without sufficient evidence is not a reasonable thing to do. Please don't think I am being an ass or putting you down cause I am not! It is wise to find the facts first.
All 4 seen 27k years ago means. The last time all four planets matched the pyramids of Egypt, and all those planets could be seen from earth was 27k years ago... however if a more advanced human race existed 13+ thousand years ago, they could have witnessed that conjunction, but only from space. Not to mention the 3 dimensional secrets I've uncovered regarding those pyramids as well.(edited reposted)
The Pyramids, Easter Island, all the amazing structures in the day that confuse people.. it all makes sense. Giants.
Genesis 6:3-5 - The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
Numbers 13:32-33 - We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.”
or go to the 2012 forum under abovetopsecret and look for the thread, "Egypt, Mayans, Masons, 2012 & YOU" I've already explained a lot and more is to come.
Polipopix, if you want even more information regarding Giza... look up Dec 3, 2012 with the free downloadable program Stellarium. Then download Google Earth. Next, look to the east one hour before sunrise, and find the 3, planets already mentioned, then look for Mars. Then go to Giza under Google Earth, find the 3 pyramids, then look for the Red Pyramid. does it all match, and if so... hint hint, how did they know Mars is red if they were so primitive?
@theinkbrain: I've been watching Mars my whole life, and sometimes it does, sometimes it don't... sometimes Venus, Mercury, and Saturn look red as well, as seen through our dusty sky. I've even seen a red moon on occasions. If Mars looks white or blue as well, the question still remains, why is it red. But more importantly, the color is a distance second to that four planet, 4 different Pyramids and a complete mathematical match/ conjunction on Dec 3 2012... all 4 last seen 27k years ago.
@litlbunnyfoofoo mars has always appeared pinkish-reddish to me, jupiter seems yellowish, and venus bluish-white. i grew up in sri lanka when there was very little light-pollution. the stars and planets do seem to have different colours to the naked eye. vedic astrologers use gems to represent the planets, moon and sun: ruby for the sun, pearl for the moon, coral for mars, diamond for venus, yellow sapphire for jupiter, blue sapphire for saturn. the only odd-ball choice is emerald for mercury.
now that hawass the prince of the pyramid-tomb dogma is out of the picture, it may be possible for a more thorough investigation to take place. so far no one has come up with a satisfactory explanation about how or why the pyramids were built. the only thing we know for sure is that we cannot duplicate the techniques used. i find the theory that they pyramids and the sphinx are a lot older than we think very convincing and that our level of technology is not the highest ever reached.
@theinkbrain sometime later this year I hope to be finished with the prelims of gather all my information/discoveries together in a very detailed easy to understand presentation. Which I will then simply give away. Post it online and then allow the world to decide what they'll do with it. I am convinced whoever built those, and all the worlds pyramids, were extremely advanced. And I believe the math I've discovered proves it. I'll post a link here when I get it all done.
@litlbunnyfoofoo thank you. i will look forward to learning from you. i read christopher dunn's the giza power plant, but i found his explanation of how the pyramid functioned and how its 'power output' was harnessed and used, incomplete and unsatisfying.
i have been thinking it would be great if the world community got together and 'restored' the pyramid, refacing it and repairing internal damage. dunn states that the pyramid functioned as a coupled oscillator - a fascinating concept....
@theinkbrain The sphinx was there before the egyptians, they just kept it up. The Great Pyramid had a couple of uses and one was as an intiatiation temple. Initiates would lay in the chamber for for three days as a symbolic death, they would be told the "secrets" of the universe and they are called the Guardians of the Secrets of the Ages. The second reason is that it served as sort of a night light because the of the conduction of water flowing under the limestone causes it to glow.
@Maniac50AE why such an elaborate structure for initiation when an natural cave would have sufficed? what were the secrets of the universe they were told? do we know these secrets? and why don't all limestone structures which have water flowing beneath them glow? what were people doing out on the giza plane after nightfall that was important enough to require the building of such an extraordinarily expensive structure ? surely a bundle of burning plant-material would have done the job!
@theinkbrain they also used caves, The Temple of Man was another built for initiation and The Temple of Isis. Caves though, were mostly used by groups that didnt have the man power to build the large temples. The templars and gnostics were the type of groups that used caves mostly. This initiation works because of what psych doctors call "transferrance." This is what happens when two or more people experience a high emotional state together causing a bond. The movie Fight Club shows you....
@theinkbrain plenty examples of this. The scene where he burns his hand with the acid is prime example. He burns him causing his metal state to become off balanced and then he tells him suggestion about the nature of the world stating that "they are the unwanted children of god and that they dont need him." This is how cults are created. The templars would drop you down a well then raise you and show you the "secret symbol" and tell you that it is yours to guard. This makes you feel elite..
@theinkbrain Elite because you have gone through an explerience and taught a supposed secret of the world. These secrest were things like, Man is the only god because we are the only force that can think and use nature. That there is a negative and opposite force in all of nature, that the universe was a war between two forces, one trying to destroy it and another trying to substain it. Most of them were not flat out said but, elaborated upon. And if you understood what the ritual was about,
you progressed to the next degree. Another one was "As above so below," the universe is a hologram, pretty much the same new age bull taught today. But the big secret, the one that is in fact real was how to control large groups of people. Plato was a priest of the mystery schools and talks about his intitiation in the great pyramid in his writngs, Pythagoras was too and that where he learned the basis of his geometric formulas and then went on to build on them. to be continuted..
@theinkbrain Thank you for so kindly and thoughtfully educating me. What you say makes sense. I am reading the Wilson/Fem Ath book, and I find the argument of a much older 'unknown' civilisation quite convincing. I wonder if DNA research will corroborate this.If those people left some descendants their genes will tell us how long ago they lived, and if they predated the Cro Magnons and Neanderthals.
The other question is how and with what tools the stone were cut ? "Pyramid were build by an advanced civilization" that's what I will teach to my children, as puma punku structure. "Ancient Alien the serie" from History chanel is a good learning base. The simple fact that we are still in theories after 4500 years proves they were more advanced than we are today. I do not trust official scientist and archeologist anymore, they behave as talibans, science as a dogma.
The pyramids were built to honor or warn about a solar cycle that happens once every 2737 years, yet only matches the physical layout of Giza every fifth cycle, yet that cycle can only be seen here on earth every 10th cycle... December 3, 2012 is the exact date Mercury, Venus, and Saturn will absolutely match the physical layout of Giza. This rare alignment will take place one hour before sunrise... this is a fact that will be viewed by the entire world.
@litlbunnyfoofoo and perfect alignement might occurs with "orion sword" between december 20 to 27 2012. Check lambert demonstration it's amazing. Also the official age of pyramid might be wrong... but science and archeology are dogma.
Great. This still doesn't prove shit. I want to know HOW the stones were quarried and moved. Who cares if the pyramids were built inside out? You would think the actual setting of the stones would be more of an Important issue than the order they were laid in. So it took this guy 8 years to figure out? Either the pyramids were constructed inside out, or outside in, it's not like they were built upside down or sideways or something. This guy wasted a lot of time and resources to figure something
In accordance with ancient Egyptian historical records, all ramp theories are null and void due to the LOW VOLUME of traffic that is possible on a ramp.
The records report construction time of Khufu's Pyramid of 20 years duration.
Therefore if ancient Egyptian records are to be disregarded, by all means maintain these ramp theories and invent more !!!
The world of FICTION has its time and place in Hollywood style movies where distortion is everything to make a buck.
Japan has attempted duplicating the pyramids using the most powerful cranes available. They could not go higher than 30 meters, after which the pyramid collapsed on itself.
Plato explains exactly how they where build! Egyptian priests told him how, first hand info! But no, ignorance rule! NOBODY mentions that for building a PI-RAMID (not pyramid) one has to know the value of PI (π) which ONLY the Greeks knew! The first Egyptian capital was called Pi-remeses not PYrameses!
Tthey were built by 60 ft giants from the planet nibiru as a scalp trophy for their latest human harvest. Every 10k years or so there`s a harvest once the population reaches about 10 billion, The illuminati are aware of this but they are spared for keeping us under control between harvests. We have reached where we are now in civilisation many times before. As Mr Spock once said in a star trek movie "it is illogical to hunt a species to extinction" Our prey is just as much unaware as we are!
@icke4pm Well there was an episode on the Twilight Zone or Outer Limits that was about aliens coming to earth to help man. They gave us book that was translated to say How to Serve Man. It was later discovered to be a cook book. But man I'm thinking that the aliens come here every 10K years to eat? Man that's along time between feedings.
the only good thing about this douchebag's theory is that he tries to persuade authorities to Sonar the pyramid. im sure they will find loads of hidden unexplainable passages
youtube people are so lame
onabigon 2 weeks ago
My research says the French have been far more adept at destroying and distorting ancient history than even the Brits. From Cambodia to Mauritania and everything in between. Anything religious is the first to be defaced. The simple fact is. It is not necessary to be Einstein to follow the money. From Roman times to current Rome. Their were GIANTS on the earth in those days. Men of old. Men of renown. The people that built the pyramids. were in fact. BIG people.
saintron60 1 month ago
@saintron60 Then how do you account for the sheer lack of big dead people? Also why would they draw themselves being the same size as tiny cattle and ox?
GeneralInsomnia 1 month ago
@GeneralInsomnia Well if you look into the matter you will see that every time new bones show up. They vanish just as fast Follow the money. Here in the US many giants have been found only to be bought up, stolen or appropriated. Never to be seen again. By you and I that is.
saintron60 1 month ago
@saintron60 One more thing to consider is. What became of the 20 plus thousand body's that have disappeared out to see after the tsunami in Japan? Its a pretty much given that Noah's flood happened. Someday who knows what will be found piled up in places like the Mariana Trench.
saintron60 1 month ago
@saintron60 So you are saying there is a global conspiracy in every country in almost every profession where everyone of different ideological beliefs get together to hide evidence of giants? I'm 100% certain that would be the required conspiracy. Even if it was stolen someone would have wrote about it or recorded it there would even be 100s if not 1000s of whistle blowers if such a thing were true.
GeneralInsomnia 1 month ago
@GeneralInsomnia I am saying no such thing. It is my belief after doing some international travelling to site's like Angkor Wat in Cambodia. The various temples in Bangkok and others. Along with three years of serious Internet research. I have concluded that very large people have in fact inhabited this planet in the past. Where they came from you can decide. The fact that much effort and expense has gone into destroying that data can be attributed to certain religions. Get it?
saintron60 1 month ago
@saintron60 No I don't because that doesn't solve the problem of global conspiracy.
GeneralInsomnia 1 month ago
@GeneralInsomnia I recommend you take two aspirin. Get a good nights sleep. And when you wake up. Ask yourself this question. Whose financial world gets rocked if they have to explain to their flock that the history they have been taught is not real. Giants are hard to explain. Ancient beings from other planets even harder. Cultures across this planet says those things were reality's. From the Old testament to the Hindu vedics, to the Sumerian Tablets. Sleep well. and happy holidays.
saintron60 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually I think it more likely because of the internal layout, along with the fact that when it was first built. its outside wall smooth as glass. Then add the water source below. You are left with a structure, capable of withstanding huge internal pressure, is also strong enough to support huge weight. Fill that box with magnesium turnings, Land ship atop. Fuel inlets aligned with air shafts. Dam the water. it meets the turnings, abra cadabra. now making hydrogen and oxy. Its a gas station.
saintron60 1 month ago
funny video :))
0werload 2 months ago
If they were using counter weights, then they must lifting it at a certain height. How did they do that? Using sand as counter weight might be the answer but it seems difficult. Built a pyramid to prove your theory french man!!
neerajmjj 2 months ago
@neerajmjj its simply because newtons idea that weight doesnt increase when connected (his stringing two stones together to see if speed increases) is blatantly incorrect. all they did was simply use the pyramid as a ramp, calculate double or tripple the amount of the weight of the object lifted, divide the larger blocks into smaller easily carried blocks, then tied each easily carried smaller using some sort of rope all of the smaller divided blocks to the stone block generating enough lift. .
funkleman 2 months ago
@funkleman Maybe you are right but no one has been been to build a pyramid without using recent technologies. Actually doing it will convince me but a computer simulation does not convince me.
neerajmjj 2 months ago
@neerajmjj then youll have to do it yourself, personaly I beilieve they used ramps and most likely had some sort of something used for rope. when you get that bitter even videodemonstrations wont work as people will complain its somehow faked lol.
funkleman 2 months ago
@funkleman look im not physicist, you seem to have learned more about physics. Good for you, your theory might be right.
neerajmjj 2 months ago
@funkleman with respect, if you believe the Great Pyramid could be built like this then you really do not understand this subject. I've studied the building of this pyramid for 16 years now; I would suggest you watch an excellent video called "The Revelation Pyramids Full video 2011" watch?v=pQFrNbqNRxI as it is superb (I don't like the last 5 mins but the first 1.5 hours are superb! indeed they should be mind blowing if you don't know much about this subject!) Enjoy!
LittleBabyBum 1 month ago
@LittleBabyBum with respect some sort of ramp had to have been used, it would have been too easy both to dammage the rope/lifting mechanism used (ropes were an egyptian invention) as well as dammage to both the monument and stone blocks used. I've seen a ton of nonsense ideas ranging to kooky to not well thought out. Actualy try something before mocking it, you can run all the theories in the world but the only way to impress your knowledge of pyramid building is actualy build one.
funkleman 1 month ago
@LittleBabyBum thiers nothing in this that cannot be built using a little common sense and human enginuity.
funkleman 1 month ago
@LittleBabyBum dont give an idiot negative disertation of something without trying something first.
funkleman 1 month ago
@funkleman to quote you "you can run all the theories in the world but the only way to impress your knowledge of pyramid building is actualy build one" - precisely. & it is this point that I feel you're missing. We cannot build the pyramid using modern techniques & equipment. Many experiments have been done in the past & all have failed miserably. It is impossible to build the pyramid using ANY known technique. & pls don't call me an idiot, I'm very well read on this topic. keep the debate civil
LittleBabyBum 1 month ago
@LittleBabyBum its spelled RED.
2012goingNutz 3 weeks ago
@neerajmjj tying the smaller blocks together that are easily carried individual equaled more than enough weight to lift. both sides of the pyramid were probably used as ramps with the larger amount of smaller blocks drapped over the side using some sort of rope. the pyramid itself was probably the positioning mechanism. brilliant and simple. You would need two or three times the weight of what you want to lift to do it, then divide the larger amount your using into smaller easier lifted blocks.
funkleman 2 months ago
im tempted to make a computer animation of it, most likely they used heated tools to cut the stone as well. nothing alien about it, they just had a better knowledge of physics.
funkleman 2 months ago
@neerajmjj ie. each smaller weight was tied individualy to the larger stone block is what i meant, the entire weight accelerating with enough lift towards the ground to lift the stone block easily while still being able to easily move the smaller blocks.
funkleman 2 months ago
I WILL SAY THIS ONLY ONCE
malvinaps1 2 months ago
Nice theory, but how did they make the granite bases lol....
iamjacobnz 2 months ago
@iamjacobnz How do they push the counter weights up... Did they discover counter weights up there when they built it lol, or perhaps they just used more counter weights??
iamjacobnz 2 months ago
prove your theory by building a pyramid!!!!!!
tz2tex 3 months ago
he is stupid... LOL
lovegr8 3 months ago
Anyone who wants to know what the true pyramids were really built for should read Chris Dunn's Giza power plant book. The pyramids were built to use harmonic resonance to create energy. Anyone who thinks that is nuts should think about this, you don't build a tomb and it just happens to end up being a perfect coupled oscillator with exactly the right frequencies created by the rock used. It had to be built for that purpose.
dastiffmeisterman 3 months ago
@dastiffmeisterman :: I have his book. It is very interesting. What is not explained is how they captured the energy and how it was used.
k0smon 3 months ago
The pyramids are 12500 years old. They were never tombs, they were temples.
k0smon 3 months ago
@k0smon More like 4500 years old. That's what the evidence shows. John West fails to convince re: the Great Sphynx, And Graham Hancock is just a total loon. When you find things in sealed passages that date to 2400 BC... well that's pretty conclusive. Let me know when you find something that dates to 10,500 BC.
Regarding the actual function of the Pyramids... I'll say that while I'm not an expert, I've always found the tomb hypothesis to be a bit creaky. But I'm not ready to venture a guess.
sbergman27 3 months ago
@sbergman27 ::: The 12500 years old comes from comparing the configuration of the stars in Orion's belt with the configuration of the pyramid complex. Also reference the rain damage done to the sphinx. What is your evidence for 4500? Also, name-calling is of no value. What is your problem with Hancock? What 'things' were found in what passages?
k0smon 3 months ago
@k0smon This should help get you back on track: tinyurl . com / ey64f
Re: West, other geologists do not seem to be convinced by his arguments. And Re: Hancock, his "arguments" have been pretty thoroughly discredited. For example, his arguments based upon comparative mythology. Claiming that two disparate myths *must* be related because both mythological characters had white beards. I have an old copy of "Fingerprints of the Gods". He'a a good writer. I was impressed until I looked more closely,
sbergman27 3 months ago
@k0smon Not temples, coupled oscillators
dastiffmeisterman 3 months ago
So lets make an experiment to see if it is true.
groendel 3 months ago
@groendel Gotta get past Zahi Hawass first. I'm not sure what is required for that. Lubricating his palm with some mula? Promising him some personal publicity? Something less obvious? I don't know. But one thing's for sure... he's not on the up and up. He's playing some sort of game with the power he holds.
sbergman27 3 months ago
I coulda done without that chanting..
MrCrazyKool 3 months ago
ummm... if its so easy then monsieur then please build one to prove your point. In case you hadn't noticed the stones are melted together, not even a paper can move between them. Also you didn't explain why the stones were caved in so that there is a curvature to the sides. And of course you're assuming it was a tomb when it was no such thing.
bluelotuspetals 4 months ago
@bluelotuspetals It's not so easy but the method presented here is the easiest. With 100000 workers the pyramid can be built even more easily since the labor reserve pool is 25 times larger than proposed.
stimsWonderland 4 months ago
@stimsWonderland It would appear the reason Mark Lehner and the Japanese team from Nissan failed to reconstruct even miniature models of the Great Pyramid is that the required technique is beyond our technology, even today! Egyptologists still claim that all work has been done using primitive chisels and hammers, the Egyptians simply had plenty of time and plenty of slaves to do the job. What a lot of hooey this is. I want to see him try it, cause he won't even come close.
bluelotuspetals 3 months ago
@bluelotuspetals Theory is such perfection can be obtained in a single generation. Human laborers had to be inside the pyramid building it from the inside out so a miniature would still be a grand project. The theory can't really be tested unless you feel like you are a rich person with lots of money and time to waste. Bottom line is that this is for archaeological research value, to sell books, tourism for the pyramids, and fame for another man.
stimsWonderland 3 months ago
@bluelotuspetals
spot on. we don't know shit, we are western culture idiots.
simple
OK2BCK 3 months ago
@bluelotuspetals "not even a paper can move between them."
I've never understood this bit. Slam any old rock onto the ground. Slam another one on top. Try to get a paper to slide between them. I just tried it. And my gods! I must be a Pharaoh!
sbergman27 3 months ago
@sbergman27 "The Great Pyramid consists of two million limestone blocks, has the height of a forty-story building and the width of two and a half football fields. The foundation of the pyramid is bedrock chiselled with a precision of only 2 centimetres off perfect level. Even today with all our technical know-how and laser precision craftsmanship according to specialists we are not able to build a structure like the Great Pyramid which such precision!"
bluelotuspetals 3 months ago
@bluelotuspetals Hi bluelotuspetals,
I'm certainly not questioning the engineering accomplishment represented by the Great Pyramid. Just the silly "can't slide a sheet of paper between" metaphor. The precision is well established. But the oft-quoted example is not so good.
sbergman27 3 months ago
@sbergman27 We simply do not have the mechanical technology available to carve the stones that construct the pyramid with the precision that has been used! Also consider that these stones are so perfectly carved and the mortar joints are so terribly thin that you can’t even get a sheet of paper in between them! The mortar joints are terribly strong, far stronger that the mortar that we use nowadays. The stones seem more or less glued or fused together. Why can't you just admit to its greatness?
bluelotuspetals 3 months ago
@bluelotuspetals "We do not have the mechanical technology available.."
Nonsense. If we had reason to construct a Great Pyramid, today, we could do it with an order of magnitude greater accuracy in 1/10th the time. What's impressive is that the ancient's did as well as they did, due to some very clever engineering & the determination of the Pharaohs. I've always imagined that if we could line up all their dried dicks in a row, Cheops' would be the shortest. Great Pyramid = The Ultimate Hummer.
sbergman27 3 months ago
I don't buy it!! First off "IT IS NOT A TOMB" Secondly if you would just look at the detailed info provided by the pre egyptian people, it shows they used a magnetic field to disrupt the gravitational field that also made the rock soft like styrafom.
It's the "B" field of a
They used four to five round magnets floating on a shaft, the magnets were spin and cause a disruptive magnetic field around the rocks that were then carved with copper tools that had a magnetic charge
wb6iaq1 4 months ago 2
@wb6iaq1 Your few sentences made more sense than this whole video. Just one question though..."In your opinion" only....How did the ancients achieve this knowledge? When I played with magnets on the ice box as a kid...I just never thought of building a pyramids with them. Don't get me wrong, I think this is closer than most peoples version...ramps/rollers/man-power/rock hammers is all a joke. I really don't care about the skin color of who built them, Just getting closer to the truth will work.
thetexanfan 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wb6iaq1 Your few sentences made more sense than this whole video. Just one question though..."In your opinion" only....How did the ancients achieve this knowledge? When I played with magnets on the ice box as a kid...I just never thought of building a pyramids with them. Don't get me wrong, I think this is closer than most peoples version...ramps/rollers/man-power/rock hammers is all a joke. I really don't care about the skin color of who built them, Just getting closer to the truth will work.
thetexanfan 4 months ago
God damn it! The pyramid is NOT a tomb. FUCK!!!!
Edubbplate 4 months ago
@Edubbplate
thats what i was thinking, thanks for yelling it out clear.
OK2BCK 3 months ago
i think it's more likely they the used the earth's ley lines and magnets. youtube search: "coral castle "
whales 4 months ago
@whales Since you brought up the Coral Castle, I guess you know that Edward what-ever his name was,always said he had the secrets as to how the pyramids were built...Even in sickness and near death, he never devulged those secrets.We all know how men aren't good keeper of secrets but this guy did. I question why and how he got this knowledge and found it important to keep it hush hush. I have my own theory but, it's out there.
thetexanfan 4 months ago
the biggest and oldest pyramids are in bosnia
Wtown06tt 4 months ago
If you can build a pyramid then try moving one of them stones with this so called technology....then get a crane and see if it can lift the stone.
anuthehigh 4 months ago
A huge HUMAN FACE image stand very near of the Sphinx of Gizeh: webspace.webring.com/people/or/ramonetriu/giza-rostro.html
Other website's RRRiu own research: webspace.webring.com/people/or/ramonetriu/links2111.html
rrriu 5 months ago
Sure! Everything grows wonderfully in the presence of pyramids. That's why that part of Egypt is so green and lush all year long. Geesh...!
BullJones 5 months ago
i hate french accent!!!
davincho1111 5 months ago
no body knows how it was built .
every one is putting his own madeup theory on table
High2Tension 5 months ago
Comment removed
High2Tension 5 months ago
It really does amaze me people are actually trying to figure out how to topple stones to make the same shape. There is also a project camelot vid where some guy talks about "the rulers" showing him things about electricity and the pyramids "that just make sense". Anyone who can't see this structure interacts with forces in a way and was built for that, I dunno what to say. It's like taking a parabolic mirror that melts steel and trying to figure out how to use it to check your lipstick...
vaporsofgold 5 months ago
Les Brown (not the motivational speaker) took the measurements (base is a square, each edge is 1.57 or half of pi X the height and from there you can figure out the side heights) and made a house out of wood. In this house he grew veggies of all kinds. Their yield was 3x as big and 3x as rapid as usual. There is a video where he shocked himself in the house 20ft and turned zinc to calcium with tetrahedron shapes. There are other vids with people experimenting on grass.
vaporsofgold 5 months ago
@vaporsofgold
"turned zinc to calcium with tetrahedron shapes. "
LOL yer, thats why he patented this idea and made a fortune from it.
gorilla199uncensored 5 months ago
our pagan gods put them their for us to enjoy .
ukgreaterlondon 5 months ago
no...wrong...wrong ...wrong again...they want to answer one of the worlds greatest misteries with some technical gadgets and fancy 3-d images..NO !!!...WRONG..!!!
wickedOPS 5 months ago
@wickedOPS theres another video on youtube that doesnt use ANY gadgets to explain how someone could simply lift a 3ton block
iMoNsTeRBMX 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc3.yolasite.com
figure4etc2.yolasite.com
figure4etc1.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
What is still not clear?
Mastabas were built for millenia
Step pyramids were built around 2600 BCE
Shortly afterwards we have the collapsed pyramid, the bent pyramid and the red pyramid.
It is no leap of the imagination to see a progression in building techniques and expertise in the sequence.
Huttate1 6 months ago
great video... im more interested in how they illuminated the inside onf the pyramid and how they got the walls perfectly in angle than how its build!
srtounez 6 months ago
@srtounez Yeah, true, there's still a lot of unanswered questions.
LeonDawson11 6 months ago
@zephranna01 Sorry, wrong answer, try again.
shrikechan 6 months ago
@zephranna01 maybe they will admit it when you learn how to spell words civilisation = civilization ...it even underlines misspellings man? However, maybe this was just a sarcastic post to get a thumbs up LOL!
aaron2414 6 months ago
@zephranna01 you're so fucking stupid.
hurpderp123 6 months ago
@zephranna01 Archaeologists work on evidence, not speculation. No evidence, no reason to admit anything.
FantasmaBAnco 6 months ago
there not tombs! noone has ever found a body in a pyramid. pyramids are all over the world,just hidden,look it up :)
ishy321 6 months ago
They brought the whole pyramid inside a spacecraft, like a toy, and placed it in Egypt.
pacerodi 6 months ago
@pacerodi Oh, yeah. Extraterrestrials with a technology advanced enough to transport a pyramid with an estimated weight of over six million metric tons like a toy, would have to build this pyramid out of millions of individually cut pieces of terrestrial rock material, which can be shown to be cut and carved that way with very primitive techniques. Yeah, sounds really reasonable.
leungchaan 6 months ago
@leungchaan I dont think the theory is that it was transported here by extra terrestrials, but they came here and supplied the mathematical and architectural know-how and technology to assist the Ancient Egyptian's in building the Pyramids.
LeonDawson11 6 months ago
@LeonDawson11 Or not. Have a look at the Dahshur pyramids. You will see how the construction of pyramids evolved over time.
Huttate1 6 months ago
@Huttate1 That was fairly un-compelling. Answer literally zero questions.
LeonDawson11 6 months ago
@leungchaan The advanced technology was one that you even have potential to posses. It was build through thought form. The rocks are alive, they have a consciousness. You can read about this in the LAW OF ONE.
best333WillC 6 months ago
What if they DUG a hole in the ground and PUSHED the stones in?? After lots of erosion,, we get the illusion they were built OVER ground,, an underground tomb does make more sense doesn't it??
Losermountain 6 months ago
@Losermountain have you ever seen the pyramids man?! Thats like digging a massive hole bigger than a baseball stadium. They are fucking massive and are stacked really well :-) This theory (which I honestly haven't checked yet) seems very very likely. But who really knows... people still believe Jesus was the son of a God, and that's another crazy neverending debate. I just can't wait to die and wake up still connected to the Matrix!!!!
aaron2414 6 months ago
@aaron2414 more likely than levers and counterweights made of sticks and rope!! right?? they made a tomb and made a pyramid shape to make it easier to get to the BOTTOM,, like stairs,, lol @ the Matrix xD
Losermountain 6 months ago
@Losermountain hahaha! Im just saying man, knowing my ass I took the fucking blue pill!
aaron2414 6 months ago
@aaron2414 Dude...When you die, you get disconnected and flushed down the tube,your body is liguidated and then that in turn is fed to the live batteries...I mean humans that are still connected to the matrix. Damn! I thought everybody knew this shit!!! :)
thetexanfan 4 months ago
They where built from the top down.
LonelyIslandtrip 6 months ago
@zephranna01 well said, nobody in his right mind can beleive that pyramids of this massive size which is hard to build even with todays technology, can be build by those who didnot even have means to lift 100 ton weight to that height.
mustafa2001ali 7 months ago
@mustafa2001ali No! Because you can't figure out how someone can do something at a certain time of history doesn't mean anyone else can't. Our ancestors were not morons. We don't learn these simple ingenuous technologies based on beams and ropes because we are born in a civilization with cars and phones. But you can watch a man alone lifting a 16 tons stone this way: search "stonehenge reloaded" in youtube.
synsei1 6 months ago
@zephranna01 all the civilisation what was built on the land of egypt were all egyptian by the hands of egyptians even if the civilisation's name was changed
mahasamir1 7 months ago
@zephranna01 all the civilisation what was built on the land of egypt were all egyptian by the hands of egyptians even if the civilisation's name was changed
mahasamir1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How were the stones carved at Pumapunku? , how did they bring stones this size to the altitudes of Macchu Picchu & Pumapunku? literally hundreds of questions. What happened to the remnants of the mountain peaks at Nazca? and Coral Castle? and why?
pepeelenatico 7 months ago
@zephranna01 LOL,I have news for you, you can, and you can watch a video where a single man does It is called "Man Moves Huge Blocks!" . Are you afraid to watch it because you would see what an ass you are? The largest blocks in the pyramid were 6 ft tall. You can watch Wally Wallington singlehandedly raise a 1600 lb block three feet by rocking it you MORON. Not only are you a MORON, but you are also a COWARD because you refuse to see something that will show that you are WRONG!!!
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 If one watches the Youtube video "Man Moves Huge Blocks!" one can see one way how it could easily have been done, no magic needed.. This shows how with primitive tools they could have done it. The huge granite beams, once on site could be easily raised vertically as the pyramid rose. They did not need to drag them up a ramp from the Nile. They just repeatedly pivoted them! To raise them vertically they rocked them! MUCH easier, few men needed!!!!!
Indygoguy 1 sec ago
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 If you watch "Man Moves Huge Blocks!" you will have to come to the conclusion that if the ancients saw anybody using Houdin's methods they would have doubled over in laughter. Teams of men dragging blocks? Huge counterweights? All one needs is some small rocks to place under the stone and then just a couple of men to move it. Sorry, no aliens, no microwave beams, no levitation. Of course using canals and lochs and floating the stones works beautifully too.
Indygoguy 7 months ago
Comment removed
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 You need to watch the youtube video "Building Stonehenge-This Man can Move anything". Basically one NEVER drags a heavy stone. Why would one when one can PIVOT it. A birds eye view of this would also look like the stone is being moved in a wobbly seesaw type action. U NEVER let the stone lay flat on the ground. You keep it on pivot stones. You pivot one corner forward. Place a new pivot stone in on the other side of the middle, then pivot the other side forward, repeat. No sliding
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 . One keeps the beam on a ramp at all times. If the next level is only 2 feet high, and the level after the next is 5 ft high then one extends the ramp to a height of 7 ft. At a 45% angle the ramp face is 129 inches . One only needs to slide it HALF way up that height at which point the middle of the beam is at the upper edge, or apex of the ramp. The other side of the ramp could slope down. The giant beams could rise up in a seesaw fashion, with a slide between each see and saw.
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 If one has the large beams on site at the beginning then one would not have to slide them very far each time a layer went up.If a granite beam is 34 feet then one only needs to slide it half way up a 34 ft ramp and then just stand on one end and then pivot it to an area already built up to that layer The large external ramp is totally not needed. One doesn't even need a 34 foot ramp for each at a level. One keeps a pivot stone under each granite beam....
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 Wow, are you THAT thick? The levels of the pyramid are different heights. They range from about 6 ft to 2 feet. So when a 6 ft level was added they only had to raise one of the large blocks vertically 6 ft. When a 2 ft level was added they only had to raise the large blocks vertically 2 ft. They could use any number of methods such as using wedges to jack it up or having the blocks tied to rockers then rocked forward, shoving some stone shallow enough to fit then forward and repeat
Indygoguy 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He is wrong. His theory is not the only one that works. The very simple theory that the huge blocks were placed at the site of the future pyramid at the START of the construction, and then raised up as each level was built works BETTER! It does not require a ramp NOR a counterweight lifting mechanism!!! The pyramids are built with much less effort this way!!! He has been observant but made wrong assumptions. The grand gallery had a giant PISTON in it. This was a PUMP!
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 You are a ridiculous person in that you ASSUME that you know which theory I believe and then try to criticize me for what I don't believe. At the same time YOU believe THIS ridiculous theory. Anyone with even the slightest common sense can see that all of his elaborate ramp and counterweight system was not necessary AT ALL. Why pile TONS of earth up and construct a dangerous counterweight system when one could put the blocks on site at the beginning. They'd rise with the pyramid.
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 If you mean by an exterior ramp that goes all the way to the top then EVERYONE was taught that. If you assume I BELIEVE that then you are wrong and have made an ASS out of yourself. Why don't you ask what I believe before you jump to conclusions. What I also don't believe is that they build a massive ramp to the height of the King's chamber and a massive counterweight system when they didn't have to. They could have just had the granite blocks at the site from the start.
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 You choose ignorance and declare it a virtue. You assume you know what I have been taught and what I believe. You are a simpleton and a fool.
Indygoguy 7 months ago 2
@zephranna01 You want to think that, so think that, You like to live with fantasies.
Indygoguy 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Great Pyramid was a pump as described by Edward Kunkel. One thing a pump needs is a safety release valve. This explains why the "air shafts" in the Queen's chamber were NOT continued to the inside. The blocks that covered these shafts did have the shaft carved into them only it stopped just an inch or so from the surface of the room. In the event that the Queen's chamber lost it's air cushion the pressure would burst through these last inches of limestone, saving the room from destruction.
Indygoguy 7 months ago
Comment removed
Indygoguy 7 months ago
Comment removed
Indygoguy 7 months ago
@zephranna01 Houdin is just as silly. He still proposes a MASSIVE ramp solely for the purpose of getting the huge ceiling slabs of the King's Chamber up to height. None of that is necessary!!! They would only have had to have them at the site at the START of construction, then, as each level was built the granite slabs were raised a level. This would not have been difficult. They raise houses off their foundations by stacking timbers under them! To propose they ignored the easy way is idiotic!
Indygoguy 7 months ago
This architect is lost in space!!
What about the lines of Nasca in Peru?
pepeelenatico 7 months ago
@zephranna01 I have heard of Atlantis. The evidence to go by seems minimal but behind most stories there is some truth. I doubt many of the gaps in human history will ever be known. If the great library of Alexandria hadn't been toasted I can't imagine how much more we would know. There was a book written (cant remember by which greek guru) about the history of the earth which was lost. If you search "archeology news" or archaeologica its a good site updated daily.
floatinginblue 7 months ago
@floatinginblue I don't believe for a second that the collective wisdom of the known world was destroyed in the Alexandria Library Fire. There are those that would like us to believe that. I for one don't. Ah if only I could be a fly on the wall, and able to freely roam around the rooms below the Vatican, and other like places in London, Wash. DC , and Paris.
saintron60 1 month ago
@zephranna01 The knowledge could have come from a much older generation but the evidence points to and age of 2551-2472BC based on carbon dating. In saying that the first Egyptians would have been completely different to those who came years after. The question I think is where did the original people in Egypt come from with knowledge like that. It will be interesting to see the final discoveries of the latest queens shaft explorations.
floatinginblue 7 months ago
this dude is a liar!!!!! japanes did already found out about this long ago! with ultrasound they did it!!! for sure he knew about the japanes!!!.
puppeteye 7 months ago
one ston for every 50 secunds is imposible!!!
pepeelenatico 8 months ago
@pepeelenatico well, the closer estimates are one stone cut and placed every 9 seconds. (even thought the stonesc came from 600 miles away in the aswan quarry.) and the heavist top stones are over 20 tons. and theres 2.5 million of them
guineapiggyman 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol...sWhen are the silly archeologists ever going to admit it?
These pyramids and some other monuments in Egypt were created for ALIENS
o wrong. How could they lift 200 tones blocks...silly.
pepeelenatico 8 months ago
@zephranna01 I totally agree with everything, but would like to share some info with you. The water didn't have to be there because of rain.. it came (could've come) from the pyramids being used as a pump to get water from the nile to everywhere else.
sentinelkennels . com/Research_Article_V41 . html
and watch this watch?v=CRv9cdG82bY&NR=1
it has a lot about water, pyramids, and ancient egypt
wygram 8 months ago
why they cant just leave other folks stuff alone, always tryna own or explain something that is way over their heads.
MsNyheim 8 months ago
I don't understand your point. You slide the stones up the ramp to the level you are working on. Then you slide the stones horizontally, placing the furthest stones first. According to Oahspe , the ramp was 7 times as long as the level they were working on. so the angle would be ? (you do the math) They used capstans to assist the pulling.
k0smon 8 months ago
@zephranna01 To say that “another civilisation build the pyramids”, it means you have not been to Egypt. Have a look at all the Valley of the Kings and all the incredible work that is there, not to mention the huge amount of treasures in the Egyptian museum in Cairo. The evident are everywhere in Egypt that the old Egyptian civilisation were far more advanced than we think it is. You need to see and judge it yourself not watched in a TV news.
bushbush2000 8 months ago
These pyramids are, at least, 20,000y/o, and the erosion evidence on the Pyramids and the Sphinx proves it.
Born2Flesh 9 months ago
lol...so wrong. How could they lift 200 tones blocks...silly.
gab1159 9 months ago
@gab1159 ::: They did not lift them, they slid them.
k0smon 8 months ago
@k0smon
Still, when they're on a corner, they must lift the stone.
Sliding these stones upward would have been almost impossible.
gab1159 8 months ago
this news reporter looks like a game show host....pin stripe suit, fake tan, pink tie...he should be the host on some 1980's game show.
thermaldog 9 months ago 2
@thermaldog ... erm... that's not a fake tan. The dude's part Indigenous Australian.
FantasmaBAnco 6 months ago
@zephranna01 I understand what you are saying, but the one thing that is missing is the evidence for such a civilization, and yes I have heard many theories about a higher civilization before the Egyptians. There are many mysteries out there in the world that still need to be solved, but trying to say it was this or that without sufficient evidence is not a reasonable thing to do. Please don't think I am being an ass or putting you down cause I am not! It is wise to find the facts first.
RickTheDemonBoy 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All 4 seen 27k years ago means. The last time all four planets matched the pyramids of Egypt, and all those planets could be seen from earth was 27k years ago... however if a more advanced human race existed 13+ thousand years ago, they could have witnessed that conjunction, but only from space. Not to mention the 3 dimensional secrets I've uncovered regarding those pyramids as well.(edited reposted)
litlbunnyfoofoo 10 months ago
Comment removed
litlbunnyfoofoo 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Pyramids, Easter Island, all the amazing structures in the day that confuse people.. it all makes sense. Giants.
Genesis 6:3-5 - The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
Numbers 13:32-33 - We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.”
hootyhaha 10 months ago
you all are wrong
asthenia166 11 months ago
or go to the 2012 forum under abovetopsecret and look for the thread, "Egypt, Mayans, Masons, 2012 & YOU" I've already explained a lot and more is to come.
--Charles Marcelloo
litlbunnyfoofoo 11 months ago
Polipopix, if you want even more information regarding Giza... look up Dec 3, 2012 with the free downloadable program Stellarium. Then download Google Earth. Next, look to the east one hour before sunrise, and find the 3, planets already mentioned, then look for Mars. Then go to Giza under Google Earth, find the 3 pyramids, then look for the Red Pyramid. does it all match, and if so... hint hint, how did they know Mars is red if they were so primitive?
--Charles Marcello
litlbunnyfoofoo 11 months ago
@litlbunnyfoofoo i don't know - but i always thought that mars looked reddish to the naked eye - last time i checked it still does....
theinkbrain 10 months ago
@theinkbrain: I've been watching Mars my whole life, and sometimes it does, sometimes it don't... sometimes Venus, Mercury, and Saturn look red as well, as seen through our dusty sky. I've even seen a red moon on occasions. If Mars looks white or blue as well, the question still remains, why is it red. But more importantly, the color is a distance second to that four planet, 4 different Pyramids and a complete mathematical match/ conjunction on Dec 3 2012... all 4 last seen 27k years ago.
litlbunnyfoofoo 10 months ago
@litlbunnyfoofoo mars has always appeared pinkish-reddish to me, jupiter seems yellowish, and venus bluish-white. i grew up in sri lanka when there was very little light-pollution. the stars and planets do seem to have different colours to the naked eye. vedic astrologers use gems to represent the planets, moon and sun: ruby for the sun, pearl for the moon, coral for mars, diamond for venus, yellow sapphire for jupiter, blue sapphire for saturn. the only odd-ball choice is emerald for mercury.
theinkbrain 10 months ago
now that hawass the prince of the pyramid-tomb dogma is out of the picture, it may be possible for a more thorough investigation to take place. so far no one has come up with a satisfactory explanation about how or why the pyramids were built. the only thing we know for sure is that we cannot duplicate the techniques used. i find the theory that they pyramids and the sphinx are a lot older than we think very convincing and that our level of technology is not the highest ever reached.
theinkbrain 10 months ago
@theinkbrain sometime later this year I hope to be finished with the prelims of gather all my information/discoveries together in a very detailed easy to understand presentation. Which I will then simply give away. Post it online and then allow the world to decide what they'll do with it. I am convinced whoever built those, and all the worlds pyramids, were extremely advanced. And I believe the math I've discovered proves it. I'll post a link here when I get it all done.
litlbunnyfoofoo 10 months ago
@litlbunnyfoofoo thank you. i will look forward to learning from you. i read christopher dunn's the giza power plant, but i found his explanation of how the pyramid functioned and how its 'power output' was harnessed and used, incomplete and unsatisfying.
i have been thinking it would be great if the world community got together and 'restored' the pyramid, refacing it and repairing internal damage. dunn states that the pyramid functioned as a coupled oscillator - a fascinating concept....
theinkbrain 10 months ago
@theinkbrain The sphinx was there before the egyptians, they just kept it up. The Great Pyramid had a couple of uses and one was as an intiatiation temple. Initiates would lay in the chamber for for three days as a symbolic death, they would be told the "secrets" of the universe and they are called the Guardians of the Secrets of the Ages. The second reason is that it served as sort of a night light because the of the conduction of water flowing under the limestone causes it to glow.
Maniac50AE 9 months ago
@Maniac50AE why such an elaborate structure for initiation when an natural cave would have sufficed? what were the secrets of the universe they were told? do we know these secrets? and why don't all limestone structures which have water flowing beneath them glow? what were people doing out on the giza plane after nightfall that was important enough to require the building of such an extraordinarily expensive structure ? surely a bundle of burning plant-material would have done the job!
theinkbrain 9 months ago
@theinkbrain they also used caves, The Temple of Man was another built for initiation and The Temple of Isis. Caves though, were mostly used by groups that didnt have the man power to build the large temples. The templars and gnostics were the type of groups that used caves mostly. This initiation works because of what psych doctors call "transferrance." This is what happens when two or more people experience a high emotional state together causing a bond. The movie Fight Club shows you....
Maniac50AE 9 months ago
@theinkbrain plenty examples of this. The scene where he burns his hand with the acid is prime example. He burns him causing his metal state to become off balanced and then he tells him suggestion about the nature of the world stating that "they are the unwanted children of god and that they dont need him." This is how cults are created. The templars would drop you down a well then raise you and show you the "secret symbol" and tell you that it is yours to guard. This makes you feel elite..
Maniac50AE 9 months ago
@theinkbrain Elite because you have gone through an explerience and taught a supposed secret of the world. These secrest were things like, Man is the only god because we are the only force that can think and use nature. That there is a negative and opposite force in all of nature, that the universe was a war between two forces, one trying to destroy it and another trying to substain it. Most of them were not flat out said but, elaborated upon. And if you understood what the ritual was about,
Maniac50AE 9 months ago
you progressed to the next degree. Another one was "As above so below," the universe is a hologram, pretty much the same new age bull taught today. But the big secret, the one that is in fact real was how to control large groups of people. Plato was a priest of the mystery schools and talks about his intitiation in the great pyramid in his writngs, Pythagoras was too and that where he learned the basis of his geometric formulas and then went on to build on them. to be continuted..
Maniac50AE 9 months ago
@theinkbrain Thank you for so kindly and thoughtfully educating me. What you say makes sense. I am reading the Wilson/Fem Ath book, and I find the argument of a much older 'unknown' civilisation quite convincing. I wonder if DNA research will corroborate this.If those people left some descendants their genes will tell us how long ago they lived, and if they predated the Cro Magnons and Neanderthals.
peace.
theinkbrain 9 months ago
The other question is how and with what tools the stone were cut ? "Pyramid were build by an advanced civilization" that's what I will teach to my children, as puma punku structure. "Ancient Alien the serie" from History chanel is a good learning base. The simple fact that we are still in theories after 4500 years proves they were more advanced than we are today. I do not trust official scientist and archeologist anymore, they behave as talibans, science as a dogma.
polipopix 11 months ago
this is bs.. the pyramid is not a tomb..
next
serrtucheserrtuche 11 months ago
OMG another desperate theory . How sad we pay these morons and give them respect. Seems like the "educated" are the dumbest.
sirbata 11 months ago
its because they are simply regurgitating what the system has programmed into there sence and "education"..
they are blinded and restricted/held back by the education received in institutions carefully controlled throughout time
whatever..
bo0 this video!
serrtucheserrtuche 11 months ago
@serrtucheserrtuche well said
sirbata 11 months ago
The pyramids were built to honor or warn about a solar cycle that happens once every 2737 years, yet only matches the physical layout of Giza every fifth cycle, yet that cycle can only be seen here on earth every 10th cycle... December 3, 2012 is the exact date Mercury, Venus, and Saturn will absolutely match the physical layout of Giza. This rare alignment will take place one hour before sunrise... this is a fact that will be viewed by the entire world.
--Charles Marcello
litlbunnyfoofoo 11 months ago
@litlbunnyfoofoo and perfect alignement might occurs with "orion sword" between december 20 to 27 2012. Check lambert demonstration it's amazing. Also the official age of pyramid might be wrong... but science and archeology are dogma.
polipopix 11 months ago
Great. This still doesn't prove shit. I want to know HOW the stones were quarried and moved. Who cares if the pyramids were built inside out? You would think the actual setting of the stones would be more of an Important issue than the order they were laid in. So it took this guy 8 years to figure out? Either the pyramids were constructed inside out, or outside in, it's not like they were built upside down or sideways or something. This guy wasted a lot of time and resources to figure something
clubcalichad20 11 months ago
Checkout "Rampless Egyptian Pyramid Construction"
titaniumtube 11 months ago
In accordance with ancient Egyptian historical records, all ramp theories are null and void due to the LOW VOLUME of traffic that is possible on a ramp.
The records report construction time of Khufu's Pyramid of 20 years duration.
Therefore if ancient Egyptian records are to be disregarded, by all means maintain these ramp theories and invent more !!!
The world of FICTION has its time and place in Hollywood style movies where distortion is everything to make a buck.
Most people like truth !
titaniumtube 11 months ago
Japan has attempted duplicating the pyramids using the most powerful cranes available. They could not go higher than 30 meters, after which the pyramid collapsed on itself.
Maybe this Fromage expert should build his own.
DancingET 11 months ago
Plato explains exactly how they where build! Egyptian priests told him how, first hand info! But no, ignorance rule! NOBODY mentions that for building a PI-RAMID (not pyramid) one has to know the value of PI (π) which ONLY the Greeks knew! The first Egyptian capital was called Pi-remeses not PYrameses!
sonydogman 11 months ago
i think David Willcock explained why this guys method wouldn't work.
5tranger 1 year ago
Tthey were built by 60 ft giants from the planet nibiru as a scalp trophy for their latest human harvest. Every 10k years or so there`s a harvest once the population reaches about 10 billion, The illuminati are aware of this but they are spared for keeping us under control between harvests. We have reached where we are now in civilisation many times before. As Mr Spock once said in a star trek movie "it is illogical to hunt a species to extinction" Our prey is just as much unaware as we are!
icke4pm 1 year ago
@icke4pm Well there was an episode on the Twilight Zone or Outer Limits that was about aliens coming to earth to help man. They gave us book that was translated to say How to Serve Man. It was later discovered to be a cook book. But man I'm thinking that the aliens come here every 10K years to eat? Man that's along time between feedings.
fffreddie 11 months ago
@icke4pm Are you one of these human eating aliens or an illuminati? (illuminatum? illuminatus?)
synsei1 6 months ago
Nah, they were built the same way as Coral Castle using the Resonant Frequency of stone to make the stone weightless.
speedrecovery 1 year ago
They mad because of there gay eifeltower
terakretonia 1 year ago
the only good thing about this douchebag's theory is that he tries to persuade authorities to Sonar the pyramid. im sure they will find loads of hidden unexplainable passages
blankplanet 1 year ago