Added: 5 years ago
From: satosanyoutabe
Views: 35,650
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (71)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I Am A Truther but The Truthers are contradicting Themselves here first They say the jet fuel kerosene would Not have much damage to cause the world trade centers to collapse but here They say jet fuel would do much damage. I believe It was a 757 that hit the pentagon also 767 hit the WTC & caused much damage but also looks like controlled demolition too.

  • question: how far would a 757 travel going 550 mph after hitting the Pentagon? There were people standing on the roof behind where the roof collapsed. How far is it from the front of the building to where the people where standing on the roof?

  • @kennyplay I seen a video taken from the Double Tree hotel It looked like to Me the 757 was going around 290 mph

  • It's the illumanti, THIS IS WHO IS CAUSING THIS!!

  • If you are capable of getting dressed without putting all of your clothes on backwards then you should be capable of understanding the mountain of actual evidence that proves flight 77 crashed at the pentagon. My question is, who dresses the twit in the red sweater? Somehow truthers know more than the thousands of witnesses that verify a 757 crashed. Amazing!

  • @dreadnaught2 who are these witnesses? people who nobody knows... and it takes only a couple thousand dollars to convince someone to either lie as a witness or just make up stuff... wouldn't YOU lie, or just saywhat they tell you to say for thousands??

  • i watch this at school today thats why im watching this for real lol im for real

  • Reduce the pentagon to the thickness of a pancake?. very scientific.. You would have to spread it over 50 square miles to do that. Notice how the fool in the video disproves a random sentence in some little known book called America Attacked and uses that to... well... talk a load of bull about some pictures he saw. This guy is forming some very flimsy arguments and is, in my opinion, creating an UNTRUTH in order to boost his own dubiouse popularity ratings. Wake up people. lol

  • yeah, why didn't the Pentagon fall? Something is fishy about the Bush Adm., ... Let's put a conspiracy poster on the back of our car to make congress open a new investigation by scientists and other professionals.

  • how come the planes that hit the world trade center knocked the buildings down .. why didnt the plane that hit the pentagon knock it down or more damage

  • and how come i have never seen any video with the incorrect date (let alone any date at all)?

  • the roof didn't have any damage because in the previous video it said it was 44 feet of the ground with the landing gears down, and the building was 70+ feet tall, so that means to have any damage to the roof, the plane would have been 30+ feet off the ground, so if it was 29 feet off, it wouldnt have done any damage

  • nonsesense - 86000gallons of fuel - what do you think happened to it? 86 million BTUs and 3000 degrees farenheit. come on. Think !

  • The NEW WORLD ORDER was behind 911. Search/Watch/Learn 911 Mysteries-911 Revisited-Freedom To Fascism-Money Masters-Corrupt Banking-Corrupt Federal Reserve-Zeitgeist-Loose Change-Aaron Russo-Benjamin Freeman-New World Order-Beyond Treason-FEMA Concentration Camps-David Icke (World Banking & Tears 911 Apart)-Fluoride-Chemtrails-Asp­artame-Monsantos-Bilderberg Group-Trilateral Commission-CFR-Illuminati, etc. Seek, learn & spread TRUTH.

  • and bush/rummy left w out any consequences...i dont it. Who is behind them

  • Yes, I don't it either.

  • so this jet's fuel burns at over 3000degrees, yet the planes that struck the world trade center (to support the theories the fire's werent hot enough to melt the steel beams) only burns at 650 degrees? sure say whatever supports whatever it is you are trying to imply

  • Well we all can say bush is a shit president. "JUST" say that this wasnt a CT, bush just kept reading that book in the kindergarden...

  • If the pentagon released perfect footage of the plane hitting the building....CT's would call it fake anyways.

  • but answer why they won't release any tapes in the first place.

  • Bush caused 9/11. it's a fact.

  • Bush got telekenesis?

  • yes and judi powers

  • @futbolequis YOUR MOM CAUSED YOU TO BE A FUCKASSBITCHPIECEOFSHITGODDAMN­ASSHOLEFUCKINGNOBRAINSS!

  • maybe it didn't go all the way through, its the right shape and everything for the 757 just it might not have went all the way through the wall.

  • even so, a 757 has a wing span of 124 ft and they didn't even scratch a window.. let alone break one..

    and the only seen piece of the rotor from the engine is recognised as part of a JT8D Turbo from from a US Air Force A-3 Skywarrior.

  • Just curious, how can anyone see the hole? it's obscured by smoke or the foam spray - Dave's analysis is bunkum (nevermind all the subsequent photographic proof and witness statements that have come out).

  • There is no evidence that sais it was a plane at all dude, a couple pieces isnt enough to say a giant assed plane hit, so stop coming up with such retard comments.

  • flight 77 was going at 530mph = 777 ft/s and a 757 has a max takeoff weight of 250,000 lbs. Using the equation E=1/2*M*V2(velocity squared), that means that the plane hit with roughly 2.345558937e+9 foot pounds of force, which translates into 3,180,150.9055557 KJ. That's less energy then what WTC1 got hit with.

  • you are smart

  • Thanks. Math is your friend in this kind of situation.

  • it's called math. anyone can do it...

  • the fbi rem video footage from a nearby hotel that had cameras on the roof and where filming the pentagon, so yeah they removed evidence.

  • bush knocked down the towers!!!!!!!!!

  • According to your official conspiracy theorists theory, the whole of the pentagon should have collapsed in the same way as wtc's 1 and 2. You cannot hvae it both ways.

  • The "HOLE" of the Pentagon should have been much larger, or there should have been broken off wreckage from the plane in front of the building.

    "HAVE" you considered that maybe your too narrow minded to understand anything outside your little bubble of reasoning?

  • What are you talking about! I was being sarcastic!

  • Well in that case I apologize. It's hard to tell with all the people who post comments such as that, except they're 100% serious.

  • Environmental specialist? Thats not even credible. Jesus christ you guys are desperate. Why don't you go find Homie the Clown and have him be your source of info.

  • Morons.

  • Very intelligent response.

  • it was an american airlines jet..no question...if you want explanation please ask and i will post..but it was american airlines flight 77...

  • I want an explanation, so please do post.

  • I'll bite. How do you know?

  • Here's a better question, how could the government speedily modify the pentagon, surrounded by people and traffic, without using explosives that would singe the book, etc?

    So now the security guards at the pentagon who have the footage of the destruction are in on the conspiracy?

  • Simple...they talk they die. Fear is the most powerful tool.

  • Watch "screw loose change" and you will sing a different story.

  • Good job, you proved that a plane does less damage than we expected. So do cruise missiles have landing gear? You know, like the one's they found inside?

  • And can they zig zag and knock down 5 light poles? Some people are funny. "Where are the wings? Gee, I don't know how a plane going 550 mph can not be still intact".

  • LOL

  • I didn't know they fount landing gear, where have you read/seen that?

  • I'm pretty sure FOX news's website.

  • if you think it was bush you should probably think about who has benifited most.

    bush is now the laughing stock of the nation so who did it

  • a plane would have not blown up that quick it would have gone through almost all the wy through it

  • F*ck tha fbi & cia.

  • me hate 2 think what happened 2 the ppl on that flight.

    cause no dam plane caused a hole that small..

  • cruise missiles are 18 feet long, exactly about the size of the thing in that video in front of the white smoke trail. Deal with it you fuckin republican bastards, the asshole you voted into office has been fuckin lying to us for the past 6 years.

  • The grass infront of it isn't even covered is ashes... the gras isn't burned, or even discolored at all... how do you have green grass with an explosion that big? hahaha

  • 14-15 feet. size of a tamahawk cruze missle

  • 5 stars, its so obvious an inside job

  • What the hell is BTU rate?

  • Its a measurement of heat...

    Like a kilowatt is a measurement of electricity.

  • British Thermal Unit. Geesh!

  • Prosit / Bless you!

  • 14-15 feet. size of a tamahawk cruze missle

  • Yes yes conspiracies: get used to it: we're f-----

    Dont ever use just the internet, TV or books: its not reliable statistically! If you think you can make a difference.

  • i agree. things are changing. an far to fast. are nation is becoming to zellues. and are ledars are hurting us, just to gain power.

  • http://911physics.co.nr/

  • Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories

    http://www.geocities.com/debun­king911

    911 Myths

    http://www.911myths.com

    Loose Change Viewer Guide

    http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/L­ooseChangeGuide.html

    Counter-video of Loose Change

    http://www.lolloosechange.co.n­r

    911 Conspiracy Smasher

    http://911conspiracysmasher.bl­ogspot.com

  • http://www.whatreallyhappened.­com/wtc2_floor78.html

  • http://www.link4u.com/candle.h­tm

  • something definitely strange going on,i have to say after watching second part.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more