Added: 3 years ago
From: JoanScutter
Views: 63,669
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hee hee! it just keeps getting better, ha ha! hoooo hooo hooo hooooo!

  • @MsAqualion: I reserve comments for those who want to ask SERIOUS questions or make interesting observations. Posting "fluff" is NOT permissible. Should you post additional comments that reflect this sort of childish behavior then they will simply be deleted and you will be put on my Blocked List.

  • the only problem i have with this video is that he took so many photos of the craft or object yet all of these photos are taking at one angle?not only that the terrain an size seems to differ between photos also in one photo there are tree's very close to this object then in another there are no trees? dont try an tell me that he cleared the trees also i read the description an info..anyways id like to believe this but? very interesting story thanx for the upload.:)

  • @poiislifelifeispoi": They are NOT all at one angle. Look closer, they are from several different distances and angles. The trees you say are missing are NOT missing...they are simply not SEEN at the angle he took the picture. I have studied this evidence for over (10) years and there are NO inconsistencies in the photographs. Also, even though you can't tell, there was a steep drop off on the far side of the Obelisk...and that is why he could not take pictures from that side.

  • I am tending to believe this cause all of this would be extremely hard to fake back then,plus there are loads of other evidence in this strange case.

  • So. where is the "obelisk" ?

  • Some cases are really to good to be true.

    If one believes or not thats something we have to find out for ourselfs.

    After years of seeying this case and Bill myers photos of flying ufo's soooo close to him i still don't know.

    Anyway good pictures.

  • thank you Joanscutter for all the info and vids.. i really enjoyed it and i believe it is a real and truthfull story..

  • What do u think this was used for.. a beacon of somesort?

  • this thing is real folks ! dam great footage thanks so much

  • NO!! why did the doggy have to die?!

  • would have been wise to take sample of that white power remains of dog. But one would have to be machine to think clearly in sutch situation.

  • he missed his chance, he should have taken it home the minute it touch the ground.

    how big is it? 

  • @wangvang2012 The object is bigger than it looks it is organic sympethic from what i heard and understand and it's bit like the tardis of Dr who.

  • Looks alot like the Aurora! Very futuristic for that time period especially. Makes a good case for the defendant.

  • WHY DAS NOBODDY ASK WHERE IT = RIGHTNOW ?

  • the dog....hhhhm why no pictures of the dog!

  • @jamierourketen: The videos...hhhhm...why not watch all the videos first?! Please watch all the videos and read all of the video descriptions before asking questions that have already been answered a hundred times over. The dog was DISENTIGRATED...so there was nothing left of it except a fine white residue on the ground. And, that white residue WAS filmed and some framegrabs from that footage are included in the body of evidence on my YouTube Channel under video (9) - Dog Powdered Remains.

  • @JoanScutter ..will do!

  • @JoanScutter Is that the space craft of the alien? If so it seems too small to carry the alien compared to pics of the alien body?

  • @Joel0277: It is not believed to be a space craft. It seemed to Rutter as though it were more of a sentinel...or protector. When he struck the creature, the black object began making piercing noises that ended up making him extremely sick. It could have been used for multiple purposes. This is just something we will probably never know for sure.

  • Joan, on the information you said and I quote, "...the reason there was no foliage blocking the Obelisk in that initially released photo was because Rutter had cleared the foliage in front of the Obelisk prior to taking that picture so that he would have a completely unobstructed photo of it," unquote. Does it mean that he really got to be really that upclose to the Obelisk as to be able to pfysically touch it? Or did you mean that by cleaning he retouched the photo of foliage off the Obelisk?

  • @valleyofneptune: I mean he really got close enough to the Obelisk to touch it...and in fact he says that he did touch it. And just to be clear, he did not retouch any photos - as there are actual negatives that all of his pictures can be compared to in order to be certain they were not retouched. The videos and pictures all became available in 1998. And technology back then was not what it is today in terms of consumer tools for photo-editing.

  • Joan thank you very much for taking the time out to answers our concerns. Your dedication to the cause is much to be admired. I believe that the truth is out there & this case with Dr. Reed is the closest to the truth. I have stated earlier that I am a bit skeptical & that only goes as far as this case is concerned for I am a true believer of UFOs & ET life. I'm leaning towards believing this one more than any of the other cases. I approach each video cautiously & with skepticism.

  • Better a skeptic than a fool. That's why I don't readily buy into the Billy Meier story, photos & videos, or the Apollo 20 tech/ET body retrieval as much as Apollo 20 itself, or any of the known Apollo moon landings & close encounters with ETs, Mars & other planetary ET bases. But this is about Dr. Reed and his horrifying experience. The footages are, to put it simply, compeling & unequalled. Best wishes to you, Dr. Reed & everyone else involved.

  • @jamierourketen there is whats left of it it got vapourised and torn apart

  • @jamierourketen Threre is pictures of the dog whats left of it powder remains check all the vids and you will come accross it.

  • Have you encountered ungulating beings.

  • The alien does not move a bit. Where is the dog. He did not film the dog dead?

  • @guscaldas2

    Keep searching, you'll get your answers.

    -Y-

  • So he just took some distant pictures of it and left it, thats it? I'm not going to cry Photoshop but have seen more impressive PS work

  • @MisterYumYums According to what he said... when he came back to take that thing home, it was gone

  • They will continue to appear to us as geometrically inviting forms until we are able to see them as they really are.

  • what happen to this black thing..

  • I want to believe this is real but there is other people who try to debunk his story.

  • @Obelisk3rdEye yes, there are relentless debunkers out there. They live to debunk. ( or...make a living from debunking?) Does any remember Philip Krass - I mean Klass? That's all he did. May he RIP This story was on CoastoCoastam awhile ago. It is very compelling

  • life pod?

  • this is most interesting,perhaps a tool that the creature was using? such as ahoaming device or gsp, whatever it is its baffling me?

  • No more baffling than us bringing a computer with GPS with us on a treck through the forest.

    It seemed to me like the creature was a researcher or some kind. Why else be out in the middle of nowhere where it expected no human contact. I get the sense that device was like it's computer, except it had a heck a lot more abilities than ours would... like the ability to hover.

  • @kosai19 nope we encountered 6 right outside my house in the city

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more