Columbia University is full of hypocrites like Lee Bollinger. They won't allow the ROTC on campus, yet welcome a tyrant who kills people for being gay.
Am so glad that Netanyahu is back on the scene. Not sure why Israel abandoned him for a time there. His is a sorely needed voice of reason for a people all too often objectified as being unreasonable.
Really? Do you think any other country on earth could do what israel does and get not so much as a slap on the wrist from the UN or the international community?
Yes, any country would be given free reign to deal with domestic terrorism by any means necessary to prevent the terrorism.
It seems your problem however must be that you don't perceive suicide bombs aimed at non-combatants as constituting terrorism, neither must you see anything wrong with Palestinians electing officials who promote such acts. Neither do you see anything wrong with neighboring nations declaring that they will wipe them off the map because they're the wrong ethnic group.
My "problem" is that I don't see the difference between Palestinian militants attacking Israeli non combatants and Israeli militants attacking palestinian non-combatants. Both acts should be defined as terrorism no matter how much ben netanyahu or mark regev attempt to legitimize Israel's actions. And can you please clarify who threatened to wipe Israel off the map due to the ethnicity of many of her inhabitants?
So basically you see no difference between those who specifically intend to kill non-combatants and then hide among their own women and children, and encouraging their children to do the same...
vs those who intend only to bring such non-discriminating killers to justice while attempting (although imperfectly) to avoid non-combatants?
You know even the Quran makes a distinction between such two groups, loudly condemning the first group and justifying the second.
You go on believing that Israel tries to avoid killing non-combatants. The country was started by Zionist terrorists who killed non-combatants on both sides, Arab and Jewish.
The killers on both sides are indiscriminate, the only difference is that one side has the ability to discriminate yet chooses not to do so.
I also note your failure to clarify your previous comment regarding the wiping of Israel off the map.
Also, it seems that it's not only the Palestinians who, as you put it, elect officials who promote terrorism. I was disappointed to see Israelis vote for a right wing government who immediately showed an unwillingness to pursue peace through negotiations.
I've found Palestinian behavior bewildering ... the only thing I can conclude is that their opinion of Jews is so low that when offered a piece of land, rather than take that as a sign of goodwill on which to build they see it as a concession earned through years of subterfuge. Which of course then inspires them to up the efforts. It's all rooted in deep prejudice, for which I have no compassion. It's the only rationale that makes sense, and a rather pathetic one at that.
@davea0511 Let me make it clear, I have no great amount of support for either side as I feel neither side makes enough of an effort to come to a compromise through peaceful means. My opinion is that Israel, as the dominant party in the struggle, is more obliged to strive for an outcome that would see an end to the conflict. I think that if anyone truly took the time to put themselves in the place of the Palestinians, that they too would feel anger and resentment towards Israel.
what Israel does? yes respond when they are attacked daily. every other country would and many have. the UN is blatantly anti-semetic. That's what you get when you give legitimacy to a bunch of dictators.
Mr. Netanyahu is a Strong Israeli leader. The pali terrorists should be thanking their god that he is not the Israeli leader right now. This man has proven that he takes no crap from forces seeking to harm Israel....May God Bless Israel and her people. TeXas stands with you.........
nuke iran, jordan, saudi arabia, and egypt to stop the pallies, they are just arabs.....israel has to protect itself, drive the pallie sinto the sea...or into other lands and never let the scumbags into israel again.....olmert is a traitor, pallies only want to kill all jews and destroy israel by making it unable to protect itself or be self sufficient
Ya, no problem, nuke all that regions ( sarcasm), but remember one thing, if that region is going down with nukes, so is Israel. So you're plan seems to be as stupid as you.
If you're too stupid to punctuate your comments without degenerating into potty mouth behavior prepare to have your post removed. I don't tolerate such an extreme lack of intelligence or creativity.
Jews comprise an incredibly diverse group of people. Most of them have no interest in the religion as a whole and base their nationalistic ideals on principles of democracy of freedom of expression. This is opposite from Iran - an entirely religious state which oppresses all non-muslims, bent on the destruction of those who stand in the way of their world domination.
Maybe you wasn't listening to what - the bloodthirsty Zionist -- Benjamin Netanyahu was saying in this video, because it is directly refuting what you are saying. This Zionist Israeli trash is attacking freedom of speech one of the bedrock principles of freedom, no wonder why the Mossad kill anybody who opposes the Terrorist State of Israel.
You're confusing "freedom of speech" with "freedom to speak where ever you want about whatever you want". Those are two very different things. By your definition of "freedom of speech" pornographic videos should be allowed as viable teaching media in the public school system. Netanyahu meant YOU when he said "some people don't understand". He's right.
The terrorist state of Israel is also a "religious state." Only Jews have the right to return through they have no true ties to Palestine.
Lastly, almost everything you are saying about Iran is a lie. Iran has a large Jewish community who refused to relocate to the Zionist State. Iran also has a large a large Christian community.
Israel has never defined itself in terms of religiousity. Their government is 100% secular. No religious rites are ever promoted by their government. Iran, on the otherhand does. Iran calls itself "the nation of Islam". Do you know what "Nation of Islam" means? Apparently not. Do you know what the 12th Imam is?
Heh, you make it sound as if the reason Persian Jews haven't left Iran is because they wholeheartedly endorse the regime. fact is there are about 20,000 Jews left in Iran-in 1979 when Khomeinism started there were 150,000 plus. Most left for the US,the UK, and, of course Israel.(Where Iranian Jews have been migrated to for centuries.)The truth is the few remaining Jews there are basically allowed to practice their religion quietly,do business,etc.,as long as they keep quiet about politics.
It's not that the "large Iranian Jewish community" has "refused to relocate" out of loyalty to the regime. Truth is, most have indeed left. Many remain for a variety of reasons including that they are elderly, and/or they have homes & busineses that they'd lose entirely if they left. They have some token spokesmen(Uncle Toms),who denounce Zionism & Israel on behalf of the community as a whole.They mostly get along with their Muslim neighbors,but no love is lost for the Iranian government.
Nobody can understand what you're saying. Proofread what you write before you click "post". Otherwise people will conclude you're just rude and biased, thus concluding your opinion is worthless. And rightly do they think so.
To refute your Bullshit, since Fox News is not go to do it,
Former American slaves haven't stole anyones land, but the Jews did steal the Palestinian's land.
Africa is a continent with many different nations; Israel is an illegal Jewish terror state that threatens every nation in Middle East with military and nuclear weapons.
These differences cannot be ignored. So please you Zionist bastard stop trying to play the black card.
No Israel was given the land by Great Britain. The British Empire owned the land in the 1940's. Do your history. The only way to get land is to:
1) inherit it (which you can't because it's owned by someone else)
2) buy it, or
3) take it over by force.
You don't automatically get it just because your ancestors once owned it. That's why American Indians can't just assume ownership of the entire US. It's the same policy all around the world.
It's a fact that "lord" Rothschild was behind the Balfour Declaration.
The British did not own the land; they assumed control of the land after or during the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The British publicly promised the Palestinians independence and secretly promised the deceitful Zionist a homeland, through the Balfour Declaration. It was not until, 1948 when the bloodthirsty Zionist finally took the land by force.
Yup, if you want to learn about cultural acceptance of pedophilia and pederasty, I invite everyone should read the Talmud.
Listen to what this son of bitch said about free speech and people claim that Israel is not a Police State. Israel is a perfect example of democracy and why the founders of the United States preached against such entities.
Last but not less, Israel is a Zionist and terrorist nation and should wipe off the earth, or, at less, not supported by the United States
Well, in that regard, the Jews got the Muslims beat. The Talmud gives a Jewish man permission to have intercourse with a 3-year-old girl and 9-year-old boy.
It means this: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this,6 it is as if one puts the finger into the eye;7 Footnote 7 I.e., tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years
Wrong - you are using this out-of-context. The verse is discussing the virgin-status of a girl who's experienced this. The phrase which in its literal translation means "it is nothing" is a Talmudic idiom for "it has no bearing on this matter" - in this example, "it has no bearing on her status as a virgin."
Since there was no dispute, you obviously agree that, based on the Talmud, Jewish men have the religious right to marry three-year-old little girls because their virginity will comes back repeatedly like tears to the eye.
Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that.24 Footnote 24 I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
This is about legal definition of marriage common then and was not rabbinic endorsement. Kidushin 41a the rabbis taught: "It is forbidden for a man to betroth his daughter while she is young [but rather he should wait] till she has grown". Rabbis strongly opposed formation of the marriage bond by intercourse (at any age) and punished those who acted in such manner (Kidushin 12b).
Kidushin 41a has nothing to do with Talmud, Kethuboth 11b. However, now we know that based on the Talmud, Jewish men have the religious right to betroth their adult daughters
For the first time I can clearly see the effort Fox news and the Israelies are putting towards preventing the american people from getting the other side of the issue.
Fox news is repeating the hoax that Ahmadinejad said he wanted to " wipe Israel off the face of the map". This has been proven to be a mistranslation, and a quote of the former Ayatollah. How do the news media get away with lying when they know it's a lie?
The phrase in question (بايد از صفحه روزگار محو شود) is more accurately translated as "eliminated" or "wiped off" or "wiped away" from "the page of time" or "the pages of history", rather than "wiped off the map". Reviewing the controversy over the translation, New York Times deputy foreign editor Ethan Bronner observed that "all official translations" of the comments, including the foreign ministry and president's office, "refer to wiping Israel away".
Ahmadinejad was quoting the Ayatollah Khomeini, who said that the Zionist regime would disappear from the pages of time, just as the Soviet Union had. No mention at all of attacking Israel, or harming Jewish people, only that the Zionist regime would end naturally just like the Soviet Union.
You keep calling me a Zionist - I have no need for "Zion" as you call it. I do recognize genocidal dogma and terrorism as embodied by those who chant "Death to Israel" and who inspire losers to target women and children with their spineless suicide bombs instead of bravely facing the reality of their unjust cause.
Columbia University is full of hypocrites like Lee Bollinger. They won't allow the ROTC on campus, yet welcome a tyrant who kills people for being gay.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
Am so glad that Netanyahu is back on the scene. Not sure why Israel abandoned him for a time there. His is a sorely needed voice of reason for a people all too often objectified as being unreasonable.
davea0511 2 years ago
The fascist UN hates Jews and supports terrorists.
StoogeWatcher 3 years ago
Really? Do you think any other country on earth could do what israel does and get not so much as a slap on the wrist from the UN or the international community?
bigpersian2000 3 years ago
Yes, any country would be given free reign to deal with domestic terrorism by any means necessary to prevent the terrorism.
It seems your problem however must be that you don't perceive suicide bombs aimed at non-combatants as constituting terrorism, neither must you see anything wrong with Palestinians electing officials who promote such acts. Neither do you see anything wrong with neighboring nations declaring that they will wipe them off the map because they're the wrong ethnic group.
davea0511 3 years ago
My "problem" is that I don't see the difference between Palestinian militants attacking Israeli non combatants and Israeli militants attacking palestinian non-combatants. Both acts should be defined as terrorism no matter how much ben netanyahu or mark regev attempt to legitimize Israel's actions. And can you please clarify who threatened to wipe Israel off the map due to the ethnicity of many of her inhabitants?
bigpersian2000 3 years ago
Bigpersian2000-
So basically you see no difference between those who specifically intend to kill non-combatants and then hide among their own women and children, and encouraging their children to do the same...
vs those who intend only to bring such non-discriminating killers to justice while attempting (although imperfectly) to avoid non-combatants?
You know even the Quran makes a distinction between such two groups, loudly condemning the first group and justifying the second.
davea0511 2 years ago
You go on believing that Israel tries to avoid killing non-combatants. The country was started by Zionist terrorists who killed non-combatants on both sides, Arab and Jewish.
The killers on both sides are indiscriminate, the only difference is that one side has the ability to discriminate yet chooses not to do so.
bigpersian2000 2 years ago
I also note your failure to clarify your previous comment regarding the wiping of Israel off the map.
Also, it seems that it's not only the Palestinians who, as you put it, elect officials who promote terrorism. I was disappointed to see Israelis vote for a right wing government who immediately showed an unwillingness to pursue peace through negotiations.
bigpersian2000 2 years ago
@bigpersian2000
I've found Palestinian behavior bewildering ... the only thing I can conclude is that their opinion of Jews is so low that when offered a piece of land, rather than take that as a sign of goodwill on which to build they see it as a concession earned through years of subterfuge. Which of course then inspires them to up the efforts. It's all rooted in deep prejudice, for which I have no compassion. It's the only rationale that makes sense, and a rather pathetic one at that.
davea0511 1 year ago
@davea0511 Let me make it clear, I have no great amount of support for either side as I feel neither side makes enough of an effort to come to a compromise through peaceful means. My opinion is that Israel, as the dominant party in the struggle, is more obliged to strive for an outcome that would see an end to the conflict. I think that if anyone truly took the time to put themselves in the place of the Palestinians, that they too would feel anger and resentment towards Israel.
bigpersian2000 1 year ago
what Israel does? yes respond when they are attacked daily. every other country would and many have. the UN is blatantly anti-semetic. That's what you get when you give legitimacy to a bunch of dictators.
dmlauffer 2 years ago
@bigpersian2000
yes. Any of the five permanent members of the UN security council. China, France , Russia, United kingdom, or United States.
IronLion27 1 year ago
Kahane was right!
zaxx19 3 years ago
Mr. Netanyahu is a Strong Israeli leader. The pali terrorists should be thanking their god that he is not the Israeli leader right now. This man has proven that he takes no crap from forces seeking to harm Israel....May God Bless Israel and her people. TeXas stands with you.........
TeXasCoastFisherman 3 years ago 2
nuke iran, jordan, saudi arabia, and egypt to stop the pallies, they are just arabs.....israel has to protect itself, drive the pallie sinto the sea...or into other lands and never let the scumbags into israel again.....olmert is a traitor, pallies only want to kill all jews and destroy israel by making it unable to protect itself or be self sufficient
OzKuffarchick 4 years ago
Ya, no problem, nuke all that regions ( sarcasm), but remember one thing, if that region is going down with nukes, so is Israel. So you're plan seems to be as stupid as you.
mohBURNABY 4 years ago 2
If you're too stupid to punctuate your comments without degenerating into potty mouth behavior prepare to have your post removed. I don't tolerate such an extreme lack of intelligence or creativity.
davea0511 4 years ago
I used to think stste of israiel is every jews
right,then I realized these phoni basterds are not even jews they have come up with this idea
by bloody mr zion in switzerland,I think it should desolve in the land of palestin.
mashangian333 4 years ago
Jews comprise an incredibly diverse group of people. Most of them have no interest in the religion as a whole and base their nationalistic ideals on principles of democracy of freedom of expression. This is opposite from Iran - an entirely religious state which oppresses all non-muslims, bent on the destruction of those who stand in the way of their world domination.
davea0511 4 years ago
Dave,
Maybe you wasn't listening to what - the bloodthirsty Zionist -- Benjamin Netanyahu was saying in this video, because it is directly refuting what you are saying. This Zionist Israeli trash is attacking freedom of speech one of the bedrock principles of freedom, no wonder why the Mossad kill anybody who opposes the Terrorist State of Israel.
TS175 4 years ago
You're confusing "freedom of speech" with "freedom to speak where ever you want about whatever you want". Those are two very different things. By your definition of "freedom of speech" pornographic videos should be allowed as viable teaching media in the public school system. Netanyahu meant YOU when he said "some people don't understand". He's right.
davea0511 4 years ago
The terrorist state of Israel is also a "religious state." Only Jews have the right to return through they have no true ties to Palestine.
Lastly, almost everything you are saying about Iran is a lie. Iran has a large Jewish community who refused to relocate to the Zionist State. Iran also has a large a large Christian community.
TS175 4 years ago
Israel has never defined itself in terms of religiousity. Their government is 100% secular. No religious rites are ever promoted by their government. Iran, on the otherhand does. Iran calls itself "the nation of Islam". Do you know what "Nation of Islam" means? Apparently not. Do you know what the 12th Imam is?
davea0511 4 years ago
Heh, you make it sound as if the reason Persian Jews haven't left Iran is because they wholeheartedly endorse the regime. fact is there are about 20,000 Jews left in Iran-in 1979 when Khomeinism started there were 150,000 plus. Most left for the US,the UK, and, of course Israel.(Where Iranian Jews have been migrated to for centuries.)The truth is the few remaining Jews there are basically allowed to practice their religion quietly,do business,etc.,as long as they keep quiet about politics.
ShmorgelBorgel 3 years ago
It's not that the "large Iranian Jewish community" has "refused to relocate" out of loyalty to the regime. Truth is, most have indeed left. Many remain for a variety of reasons including that they are elderly, and/or they have homes & busineses that they'd lose entirely if they left. They have some token spokesmen(Uncle Toms),who denounce Zionism & Israel on behalf of the community as a whole.They mostly get along with their Muslim neighbors,but no love is lost for the Iranian government.
ShmorgelBorgel 3 years ago
the west should stop this bullshid about middle east by now everyone knows the motive of this
kind of talk,get lost hands off middle easr oil,
get lost any attack on iran is attack on every muslim in the world,clearly stated in our holly
book.get lost you piecs of crap.
mashangian333 4 years ago
Nobody can understand what you're saying. Proofread what you write before you click "post". Otherwise people will conclude you're just rude and biased, thus concluding your opinion is worthless. And rightly do they think so.
davea0511 4 years ago
I was refering to the video
mashangian333 4 years ago
I understand what u you are saying. Dave doesn't speak for everyone.
TS175 4 years ago
To refute your Bullshit, since Fox News is not go to do it,
Former American slaves haven't stole anyones land, but the Jews did steal the Palestinian's land.
Africa is a continent with many different nations; Israel is an illegal Jewish terror state that threatens every nation in Middle East with military and nuclear weapons.
These differences cannot be ignored. So please you Zionist bastard stop trying to play the black card.
TS175 4 years ago
No Israel was given the land by Great Britain. The British Empire owned the land in the 1940's. Do your history. The only way to get land is to:
1) inherit it (which you can't because it's owned by someone else)
2) buy it, or
3) take it over by force.
You don't automatically get it just because your ancestors once owned it. That's why American Indians can't just assume ownership of the entire US. It's the same policy all around the world.
Duh!
davea0511 4 years ago
It's a fact that "lord" Rothschild was behind the Balfour Declaration.
The British did not own the land; they assumed control of the land after or during the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The British publicly promised the Palestinians independence and secretly promised the deceitful Zionist a homeland, through the Balfour Declaration. It was not until, 1948 when the bloodthirsty Zionist finally took the land by force.
TS175 4 years ago
Yup, if you want to learn about cultural acceptance of pedophilia and pederasty, I invite everyone should read the Talmud.
Listen to what this son of bitch said about free speech and people claim that Israel is not a Police State. Israel is a perfect example of democracy and why the founders of the United States preached against such entities.
Last but not less, Israel is a Zionist and terrorist nation and should wipe off the earth, or, at less, not supported by the United States
TS175 4 years ago
The Talmud accepts pedophilia? How about Muhammed's marriage to Aisha at 6 yrs, and sexual relations with her at 9 yrs old?
davea0511 4 years ago
Well, in that regard, the Jews got the Muslims beat. The Talmud gives a Jewish man permission to have intercourse with a 3-year-old girl and 9-year-old boy.
TS175 4 years ago
Where does it say that?
davea0511 4 years ago
Talmud, Kethuboth 11b
It means this: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this,6 it is as if one puts the finger into the eye;7 Footnote 7 I.e., tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years
TS175 4 years ago
Wrong - you are using this out-of-context. The verse is discussing the virgin-status of a girl who's experienced this. The phrase which in its literal translation means "it is nothing" is a Talmudic idiom for "it has no bearing on this matter" - in this example, "it has no bearing on her status as a virgin."
davea0511 4 years ago
Dave,
Since there was no dispute, you obviously agree that, based on the Talmud, Jewish men have the religious right to marry three-year-old little girls because their virginity will comes back repeatedly like tears to the eye.
TS175 4 years ago
Boy you twist your words like Uri Geller's spoons.
davea0511 4 years ago
Talmud, Sanhedrin 54b
Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that.24 Footnote 24 I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
TS175 4 years ago
This is about legal definition of marriage common then and was not rabbinic endorsement. Kidushin 41a the rabbis taught: "It is forbidden for a man to betroth his daughter while she is young [but rather he should wait] till she has grown". Rabbis strongly opposed formation of the marriage bond by intercourse (at any age) and punished those who acted in such manner (Kidushin 12b).
davea0511 4 years ago
Dave,
Kidushin 41a has nothing to do with Talmud, Kethuboth 11b. However, now we know that based on the Talmud, Jewish men have the religious right to betroth their adult daughters
TS175 4 years ago
You weren't reading what I wrote. Besides, it is a well known fact that these practices are far more common in Iran than in Israel.
davea0511 4 years ago
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA stupid americans and foxnews... Thats why the world calls amercians retards..
Alexander021 4 years ago
Yeah, shame on Fox news for giving the Americans the other side of the issue.
davea0511 4 years ago
For the first time I can clearly see the effort Fox news and the Israelies are putting towards preventing the american people from getting the other side of the issue.
Shame shame shame.
BestestMoron 4 years ago 2
Fox news is repeating the hoax that Ahmadinejad said he wanted to " wipe Israel off the face of the map". This has been proven to be a mistranslation, and a quote of the former Ayatollah. How do the news media get away with lying when they know it's a lie?
mauiportal 4 years ago
The phrase in question (بايد از صفحه روزگار محو شود) is more accurately translated as "eliminated" or "wiped off" or "wiped away" from "the page of time" or "the pages of history", rather than "wiped off the map". Reviewing the controversy over the translation, New York Times deputy foreign editor Ethan Bronner observed that "all official translations" of the comments, including the foreign ministry and president's office, "refer to wiping Israel away".
keepforefront 4 years ago
Ahmadinejad was quoting the Ayatollah Khomeini, who said that the Zionist regime would disappear from the pages of time, just as the Soviet Union had. No mention at all of attacking Israel, or harming Jewish people, only that the Zionist regime would end naturally just like the Soviet Union.
mauiportal 4 years ago
What part of Mahmoud leading the chant "Death to Israel" do you not get?
davea0511 4 years ago
The world would be a cleaner place without Israel. Israel makes the world dirty. I like the world clean and that's what it would be without Israel.
TS175 4 years ago
Yeah. Hitler said that too.
davea0511 4 years ago
Wow, when did Hitler make such comments about Israel? Israel did not exist until 1948, long after the death Hitler and the fall of Nazi Germany.
So, now you have proven yourself to be a true Zionist; you are a liar and fantastically deceitful storyteller! Yup, you are a true Zionist Dave.
TS175 4 years ago
You keep calling me a Zionist - I have no need for "Zion" as you call it. I do recognize genocidal dogma and terrorism as embodied by those who chant "Death to Israel" and who inspire losers to target women and children with their spineless suicide bombs instead of bravely facing the reality of their unjust cause.
davea0511 4 years ago