So ... you agree with ZJ? Technically, a skin cell from a human is a human if you distinguish things by your logic, making it ilegal to vauum your house because of the scattered, dead skin cells everywhere. A person is not just one cell. A person is a cognitive creature. There's no way that a few tiny cells are cognitive when they don't even have a brain.
so at what point are you looking at that says a embryo is a person? medical science says a embryo don't develop a brain capable of dreaming till the second trimester, i.e. after four months.
did you EVER read a Grey's Anatomy before?
and what about women that are raped and want to have a abortion as is their RIGHT. Roe vs. Wade? forget that one?
"aimed to "provide equality and rights to all human beings at every stage of biological development". This step could have eventually eliminate all types of induced abortion for nearly any reason in the state of North Dakota."
The Constitution is supposed to protect peoples individual rights to do to themselves what they want and have control of their own body as well.
@Novjunulo The right to privacy is not mentioned in the Constitution, either, yet is inferred from such things as the due process clause which protects against unlawfull search and seizure. It usually entails a general right to security of person, resting on the foundational right to bodily integrity. It is the latter which renders forced vaccinations unconstitutional and prevents the police from taking blood samples against your will.
Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Botsford, 1891"no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person."; Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., N.Y. 1914 “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient's consent commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages. ”
Oh shit, son, Zinnia told you what's up.
Iemanonymous1 1 month ago
So ... you agree with ZJ? Technically, a skin cell from a human is a human if you distinguish things by your logic, making it ilegal to vauum your house because of the scattered, dead skin cells everywhere. A person is not just one cell. A person is a cognitive creature. There's no way that a few tiny cells are cognitive when they don't even have a brain.
Vortex289 5 months ago
You got stomped, broulo.
uBeR1337gUy 1 year ago
so at what point are you looking at that says a embryo is a person? medical science says a embryo don't develop a brain capable of dreaming till the second trimester, i.e. after four months.
did you EVER read a Grey's Anatomy before?
and what about women that are raped and want to have a abortion as is their RIGHT. Roe vs. Wade? forget that one?
Cuthla 1 year ago
I can hear your hard drive.
...it's not the good sound, either.
kurisux 2 years ago
You don't understand law at all do you kid?
jaxcheetah 2 years ago 3
Neigh, neigh. Candy mountain, charlie!
prolefeedprocessor 2 years ago 2
Where in the Constitution is abortion even mentioned.
Also, this bill does not say anything about gametes. You're either an idiot or being knowingly deceitful.
Novjunulo 2 years ago
@Novjunulo
Well... its been a year but whatever...
"aimed to "provide equality and rights to all human beings at every stage of biological development". This step could have eventually eliminate all types of induced abortion for nearly any reason in the state of North Dakota."
The Constitution is supposed to protect peoples individual rights to do to themselves what they want and have control of their own body as well.
knightofdreamz 1 year ago
@Novjunulo The right to privacy is not mentioned in the Constitution, either, yet is inferred from such things as the due process clause which protects against unlawfull search and seizure. It usually entails a general right to security of person, resting on the foundational right to bodily integrity. It is the latter which renders forced vaccinations unconstitutional and prevents the police from taking blood samples against your will.
pirbird14 1 year ago
Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Botsford, 1891"no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person."; Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hosp., N.Y. 1914 “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient's consent commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages. ”
pirbird14 1 year ago
but you are wrong, a horse embryo does not have for legs, nor does it go "neigh, neigh." double standard!
uitodtrbrmhr 2 years ago 6
hahaha
Novjunulo 2 years ago
pro choice ftw
goldendomer025 2 years ago 3
pro-choice ftw!
mazzepa1 2 years ago 2
Napoleon.... is that you?
jimijamesh 2 years ago
this is so stupid
TheQueenofSnow 2 years ago 9
I have unspammed your comment. I would like to encourage free speech here.
Novjunulo 2 years ago