You cannot use man's logic to explain any scientific query. When science has a question, they work to discover the answers. When religious people try to get an answer to a scientific query, they either come up with what they think is logical and often it is a god somewhere who did it. In their case no answer was really found and the case is closed. Wonder if Einstein was one of the Discovery Institute's team, I think not, as we'd still be a long way from what we know is fact now.
This question is like say, "since we can observe evolution, why can't evolution be the cause of life?" We all know evolution is what you get after you have life. Again, not such a clever comment as he assumes.
The comment, "if new information can be added without intelligence, why can't it be started without intelligence?" Is a rather poor understanding of ID. Intelligent Design is based on the idea that new information can be added, just not started, So his question was, "why can it not be started?" From an ID stand point, this young man is only asking what ID proposes. Not as clever as he assumes.
1) irrelevant. Got nothing to do with the previous comment
2) was reading GCN engineer's criticism of you, and clicked your name by mistake. He's the idiot that has a problem with wiki. I'll go delete my previous comment and put it in its proper place.
Oddly, they seem to have been threatened by your question, as it is no longer posted. That's okay. I posted another similar query with an additional challenge to their interpretation of the term "information, and screen capped it as well.
@lennyhipp I know. but you wrote on your profile that you see yourself as a critical thinker. I pegged you, right or wrong, based on a few of your comments, that you are just a reactionary hot head with an opinion. Might even be a well qualified opinion, but reactionary, not quite the critical thinker you see yourself as. So I jerked your chain a bit, and watched you get angry. A critical thinker would have ignored me jerking your chain. It attracted comments from you.
@gcnengineer Idiot, you weren't talking to me, you were criticizing someone else, and i called you out on your bullshit. Hot head? me? phfaaaaah! i'm as cool as the other side of the pillow, idiots on youtube couldn't get me angry, no matter how much you try as i don't care enough about you to be emotionally moved by you, so sorry to burst your bubble of ignorance, but what you're projecting as anger, is merely pity and contempt. I laugh at you and your self-aggrandizing.
"So I jerked your chain a bit, and watched you get angry"
you tried to jerk my chain and i amused myself with your miniscule intellect "It attracted comments from you"
it was your moronic, sophomoric comments to a younger person that attracted my comments. So, now that you admitted you're nothing but a troll with a grandiose feeling of self-importance, you no longer amuse me.
@lennyhipp Oh, that's how I took you to school. Stop letting little digs cloud your comments, had I actually been childish we would have ended up in an insult contest.
Oh, is that what you thought they were? Digs? Hate to break it to you gramps, there's a difference between insults (what you think you made) and logical fallacies. Coming from someone who reads the "works" of Meyer, it doesn't shock me. Your comments to lordnimr0d were something a pre-pubescent teenager might make so puff your chest out and proudly bathe in your own ignorance and self-importance, but you're not impressing anyone with your child-like behaviour
@lennyhipp Still being the insulting punk I thought you were instead of the honorable thinker you claim to be I see. LOL now you'll feel compelled to insult me again! Feel free.
Strange, this child thinks they have no answer to his simple answer and makes an entire conspiracy out of it. Since, Stephen Meyer does answer this question in his book, I suppose he thought just as I did, you were just another annoying person who thinks they are clever yet simply missed the answer when it was in front of you. Who could blame him?
hmm. so now reporting on the observable facts = conspiracy? In what world?
"Stephen Meyer does answer this question in his book"
so now we're required to go out and read a bunch of books by unqualified pseudo-intellectuals? Go watch "Expelled Exposed" and come back here to explain why we should all be aware of the "works" of one Stephen Meyer. QD made his comment in the appropriate forum. The DI could have replied with "Mr Meyer explained this on pXXX of his book "xxxxxx", THEN QD could read it
@lennyhipp Explain in 500 characters or less? The book is over 600 pages, so I'll pass on taking you to school. I don't care if you better your education, I just found his explanation of events rather funny. It's like he actually believes the Discovery Institute was afraid of him. "Delusional " is a better word I suppose than "conspiracy". Come to think of it, you seem to have the same affliction.
This guy is awesome! Ridiculing a production company and making them cancel their comments, that's talent. "A face for radio and a voice for books" now that's ballsy to say. Anyway, those shouldn't matter. Zach Anner was in a similar situation and made the best of it, sure as hell made me laugh. I say everyone should subscribe to this guy, hopefully we'll get more people to stand up as individuals and make their voices' heard.
It so obvious as to why you have more subscribers - most cdesign proponentsists can't find their way to youtube! ok but seriously cool video dude, rock on.
Their hypocrisy is so blatant I am surpised it doesn't beat them over the head. How can a company help produce a film about censorship yet do it themselves on every medium they manage to control?
lol "A face for radio, and a voice for writing books..... ' love the self-depricating humor. It's too bad the DiscoTute can't laugh at themselves. God knows everyone else is.
COOL VIDEO. No wonder you have more subscribers. You actually know what the fuck you are talking about. My Subs added if I have not already. In Comradeship. Science Rocks, Morons Sux
You deserve a thousand blowjobs for what you do. I'm not going to be the one to give them to you, cause I'm not into that kinda think, but I hear DonExodus2 might be willing. haha. Keep up the good work!
I went to the video and asked them to answer the first question posted on the thread by qdragon1337. It can't hurt, right? The next time you leave a question you should make a video asking everyone to go to the video & either request they answer qdragon or have everyone copy, paste & ask the same question... might be funny to see how it turns out
Nothing surprising about it - the facts fly in the face of their baseless assertions, which leaves them no alternative but to censor. You call doing the screen capture.
Hey Dragon, they've gotten 10 more subs since you made the vid. That's 10 people who only subscribed to raze them every time they make a new video! keep it up!
The Discovery Institute is a sham, a con job to get money from the gullible theists. They do no real research, no experiments, and no field work. There entire budget seems to be focused on trying to convince the public and politcians to support their cause. After the trial in Dover, PA their real face was shown.
Nice to see a vid from you again kiddo. Been a while. I kinda missed ya.
You are looking pink and healthy too. A good sign that I should ecpect more vids :D
You are right though, I expected more from you than to play the "subs" card. But you did, you scumhole! I would have thought a logical mind like yours might have realised the futility. You might as well point out the difference in sales between the works of Charles Darwin and the works of Rhold Dhall!
Qdragon, you have that many subscribers because (1) you've got brains and (2) you've got balls. Still a fan of you mailing holy miracle water to Kent Hovind in jail. Oh yea... didn't you call Casey Luskin, the moron behind the Discovery Institute?
My brother is a financial supporter of the Discovery Institute plus he is gay. Not that that is a problem, just think that gay Creationists are probably rare.
I want to have sex with you.
M00nGlitz 3 months ago
You cannot use man's logic to explain any scientific query. When science has a question, they work to discover the answers. When religious people try to get an answer to a scientific query, they either come up with what they think is logical and often it is a god somewhere who did it. In their case no answer was really found and the case is closed. Wonder if Einstein was one of the Discovery Institute's team, I think not, as we'd still be a long way from what we know is fact now.
ktorch 8 months ago
You in your battle against the forces of ignorance truly is the best analogy to the David and Goliath story I have come across in a long time.
ASKaPHYSICIST 1 year ago
This question is like say, "since we can observe evolution, why can't evolution be the cause of life?" We all know evolution is what you get after you have life. Again, not such a clever comment as he assumes.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
The comment, "if new information can be added without intelligence, why can't it be started without intelligence?" Is a rather poor understanding of ID. Intelligent Design is based on the idea that new information can be added, just not started, So his question was, "why can it not be started?" From an ID stand point, this young man is only asking what ID proposes. Not as clever as he assumes.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
@gcnengineer
"Intelligent Design is based on the idea that new information can be added, just not started..."
So, maybe you can elaborate on why that is.
Nitrogenous bases have been observed to spontaneously polymerize in controlled conditions... identical to conditions found in nature.
We also know that the nitrogenous bases can be spontaneously generated from simple chemistry.
What's the problem? If it is observed to happen, why can't it?
DeathofSpeech 1 year ago
@DeathofSpeech Yes I am aware, as you say, " ....in controlled conditions" The one in control is the "designer" of the conditions.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gcnengineer
"The one in control is the "designer" of the conditions."
Well if there is a designer, he know bugger-all about design.
Everything he does is indistinguishable from making a random "guess" and seeing how things turn out.
DeathofSpeech 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gcnengineer
"The one in control is the "designer" of the conditions."
So your "creator" is indistinguishable from random chance? That's rather amusing.
DeathofSpeech 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gcnengineer
"The one in control is the "designer" of the conditions."
So your "creator" is indistinguishable from random chance? That's rather amusing.
DeathofSpeech 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gcnengineer
"The one in control is the "designer" of the conditions."
So your "creator" is indistinguishable from random chance? That's rather amusing.
DeathofSpeech 1 year ago
@gcnengineer
"The one in control is the "designer" of the conditions."
Is that why everything is indistinguishable from random chance?
He must know bugger-all about design. Maybe if he'd stayed in school he'd learn how to get it right after a few hundred million years, huh?
DeathofSpeech 1 year ago
1) irrelevant. Got nothing to do with the previous comment
2) was reading GCN engineer's criticism of you, and clicked your name by mistake. He's the idiot that has a problem with wiki. I'll go delete my previous comment and put it in its proper place.
4) never claimed to be!
lennyhipp 1 year ago
Comment removed
lennyhipp 1 year ago
Oddly, they seem to have been threatened by your question, as it is no longer posted. That's okay. I posted another similar query with an additional challenge to their interpretation of the term "information, and screen capped it as well.
Oh... and +1 sub. Keep up the great work.
DeathofSpeech 1 year ago
A face for radio and a voice for book writings. lol im using that!
Think4Yourselves 1 year ago
@lordnimr0d hahahaha, well if wiki says so, it must be so, now go clean up your room!
gcnengineer 1 year ago
1) the quote wasn't from wiki, google is your friend
2) wiki has been found to be as accurate as brittanica (according to research by oxford), rendering your further criticisms permanently invalid
3) you're making a poisoning the well logical fallacy
4) you're no authority on what makes a valid argument
"Now go clean your room!"?! Seriously? You claim to be 48, look 68, act like twelve
lennyhipp 1 year ago
@lennyhipp You say I have a problem with wiki? I have no idea what you are talking about young man.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
"young man"? I'm only half a decade younger than you are
in your response to lordnir0d, you said: "well if wiki says so, it must be so, now go clean up your room!"
sounds to me like you're:
A) criticizing his use of wiki in a sarcastic tone
B) making a logical fallacy
C) acting like a child
Any way you cut it, it's pretty weak. When, exactly, will you be "taking me to school"?!
I'm in the bus with the engine running... I've got a back pack full of notebooks, and my lunch is packed.
lennyhipp 1 year ago
@lennyhipp I know. but you wrote on your profile that you see yourself as a critical thinker. I pegged you, right or wrong, based on a few of your comments, that you are just a reactionary hot head with an opinion. Might even be a well qualified opinion, but reactionary, not quite the critical thinker you see yourself as. So I jerked your chain a bit, and watched you get angry. A critical thinker would have ignored me jerking your chain. It attracted comments from you.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
@gcnengineer Idiot, you weren't talking to me, you were criticizing someone else, and i called you out on your bullshit. Hot head? me? phfaaaaah! i'm as cool as the other side of the pillow, idiots on youtube couldn't get me angry, no matter how much you try as i don't care enough about you to be emotionally moved by you, so sorry to burst your bubble of ignorance, but what you're projecting as anger, is merely pity and contempt. I laugh at you and your self-aggrandizing.
lennyhipp 1 year ago
"So I jerked your chain a bit, and watched you get angry"
you tried to jerk my chain and i amused myself with your miniscule intellect "It attracted comments from you"
it was your moronic, sophomoric comments to a younger person that attracted my comments. So, now that you admitted you're nothing but a troll with a grandiose feeling of self-importance, you no longer amuse me.
lennyhipp 1 year ago
@lennyhipp Oh, that's how I took you to school. Stop letting little digs cloud your comments, had I actually been childish we would have ended up in an insult contest.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
Oh, is that what you thought they were? Digs? Hate to break it to you gramps, there's a difference between insults (what you think you made) and logical fallacies. Coming from someone who reads the "works" of Meyer, it doesn't shock me. Your comments to lordnimr0d were something a pre-pubescent teenager might make so puff your chest out and proudly bathe in your own ignorance and self-importance, but you're not impressing anyone with your child-like behaviour
lennyhipp 1 year ago
@lennyhipp I see you failed class. Figures, I thought you would.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
@gcnengineer
moron, you admitted you were a troll, so puff out your chest and be proud of that accomplishment while your grandchildren grow up embarrassed of you
lennyhipp 1 year ago
@lennyhipp Still being the insulting punk I thought you were instead of the honorable thinker you claim to be I see. LOL now you'll feel compelled to insult me again! Feel free.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
A face for radio, and a voice for writing books. That's funny. :D
SuperHappyCow 1 year ago
Well done & good luck.
TheSanityInspector 1 year ago
Strange, this child thinks they have no answer to his simple answer and makes an entire conspiracy out of it. Since, Stephen Meyer does answer this question in his book, I suppose he thought just as I did, you were just another annoying person who thinks they are clever yet simply missed the answer when it was in front of you. Who could blame him?
gcnengineer 1 year ago
hmm. so now reporting on the observable facts = conspiracy? In what world?
"Stephen Meyer does answer this question in his book"
so now we're required to go out and read a bunch of books by unqualified pseudo-intellectuals? Go watch "Expelled Exposed" and come back here to explain why we should all be aware of the "works" of one Stephen Meyer. QD made his comment in the appropriate forum. The DI could have replied with "Mr Meyer explained this on pXXX of his book "xxxxxx", THEN QD could read it
lennyhipp 1 year ago
@lennyhipp Explain in 500 characters or less? The book is over 600 pages, so I'll pass on taking you to school. I don't care if you better your education, I just found his explanation of events rather funny. It's like he actually believes the Discovery Institute was afraid of him. "Delusional " is a better word I suppose than "conspiracy". Come to think of it, you seem to have the same affliction.
gcnengineer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"I'll pass on taking you to school"
pappy, on your best day you couldn't educate me. your arrogance is only surpassed by your ignorance
"he actually believes the Discovery Institute was afraid of him"
in general this censoring debate is typical of a lot of creationist channels. i think you got the wrong impression of the vid
"Come to think of it,"
that's the point, you're NOT thinking. Grandiose Delusional Disorder. something all theists suffer from. believing in anything with no evidence
lennyhipp 1 year ago
This guy is awesome! Ridiculing a production company and making them cancel their comments, that's talent. "A face for radio and a voice for books" now that's ballsy to say. Anyway, those shouldn't matter. Zach Anner was in a similar situation and made the best of it, sure as hell made me laugh. I say everyone should subscribe to this guy, hopefully we'll get more people to stand up as individuals and make their voices' heard.
JAHkirker 1 year ago
Hello, do mutations add information or tinker and monkey with what's already there? I'm afraid it's the later. So, they haven't been refuted. Ciao!
js3k 1 year ago
@js3k that statement is factually incorrect
qdragon1337 1 year ago 10
@js3k Mutations can add, subtract, copy, and delete ACTG connections. In this way they can add information to a genome.
Intiom 1 year ago
"Hello, do mutations add information"
yes. yes they do!
"or tinker and monkey with what's already there?"
they do both... as well as duplicate (remain neutral) or erase it. An overwhelming number of mutations are neutral
"I'm afraid it's the later"
i'm afraid you need to brush up on your bio chemistry.
see "How Evolution Causes an Increase in Information, Parts I&II"
While you're watching, make note of his links to the other videos that contain more info.
lennyhipp 1 year ago
good work.
you are a clever boy. =b
pwnz0rz0r 1 year ago
It so obvious as to why you have more subscribers - most cdesign proponentsists can't find their way to youtube! ok but seriously cool video dude, rock on.
daemonowner 1 year ago
Why you have more subscribers then the Discovery Institute? Because you are infinitely more awesome then the Discovery Institute will ever be.
Robergine 1 year ago
Hhaahh!! Good one Dude!!
Garo48 1 year ago
Hey Q, I just noticed the new pillow! Fitting... quite fitting :)
sheri226 1 year ago
I just clicked the Subscription button :)
TheSpazzofMuffins 1 year ago
4,453 now, buddy!
Skeezyhouse 1 year ago
654!! ROFL...I can't believe the Discovery Institute doesn't know just how much they really suck.
CoffeeTroll 1 year ago
@CoffeeTroll i wonder which christian sect this so called discovery institute is funded by...
rrrandommman 1 year ago
@rrrandommman I second that question
GTPDRIVER01 1 year ago
I enjoy your sarcastic and witty comedy.
inquiry10 1 year ago
In reality Subscriber number has nothing to do with the quality of information!
Are atheist Channels, bigger than your that have not created any videos.
And there is for example:
"jessicamystic1"
or
"SamTxr"
see the video
"Second Half of 2012 part 4 The Hollow Earth & its Core 3/6"
as example
VyckRo 1 year ago
fuckin a.
Ninjaculation 1 year ago
"A face for radio and a voice for books"? I've never heard that phrase, but I'm definitely adding it to my vocabulary.
Omnywrench 1 year ago
thats because your a dragon :)
fyphfoko 1 year ago
"a face for radio and a voice for books". Great self irony, I think you just earned another subscriber :)
Korkzor 1 year ago 3
You have one more subscriber now. Looking forward to your next vid.
.
skeprod224 1 year ago
4453 now :D
MeSubbed!
hutchings000 1 year ago
And you're undersubscribed, too
wilfredthebold 1 year ago
Great one! Love it!
BarleyC 1 year ago
I wonder if qdragon1337 accepts hero worship...
DanceInYourRoom 1 year ago
You have a new subscriber ;-)
TheSpankymonkey 1 year ago
Best...intro...ever. lol
MrOmniblast 1 year ago
I love this guy. He never misses and hits the wall.
crabbit101 1 year ago
Their hypocrisy is so blatant I am surpised it doesn't beat them over the head. How can a company help produce a film about censorship yet do it themselves on every medium they manage to control?
Eaglesfaninca 1 year ago
1337 views!
dewooo 1 year ago
There isn't a "random kid" on YT who couldn't do a video with more content than the CI.
But atleast you've been handing their ass to them, in hopes that maybe they will grind it down and make sausages of it, for content ya know.
Daealis 1 year ago
lol "A face for radio, and a voice for writing books..... ' love the self-depricating humor. It's too bad the DiscoTute can't laugh at themselves. God knows everyone else is.
evolve749 1 year ago
Go Q! I'm off to subscribe to the DI for the lol's!
flyingfisbeefilms 1 year ago
I have no idea how I stumbled upon you but I'm glad I did! Keep it up..and don't be so hard on yourself...you da man
lankmaster 1 year ago
I'd watch your TV show!
vintis88 1 year ago
you kick so much ass.
1metallica1 1 year ago 2
You're a hero qdragon, with a face for movies and the voice of god!
BusinessIDBAI 1 year ago 2
Bringing down the Dragon on the discovery institute
Awesome
MangaFanGuy 1 year ago 2
:) Qdragon gone dun it again!
zeffii 1 year ago
You're the fucking man!
SuperMachineElf 1 year ago
@SuperMachineElf I fucking approve of this fucking comment. Especially after watching Jezuzfreaks new profanity video. Fuckin' A.
Xethavosh 1 year ago
They have so few subscribers because even the christians know they have nothing worth watching on there channel.
devdred 1 year ago
This is aswesome ...
However based on my first video posted just today I think i may win for a voice for radio and a face for books ... lemme know [eg].
Qdragon you rock ... I am glad you are feeling better and are posting videos bro.
lordtalon69 1 year ago
hahaha... the dragon has the powaaaa! the ID has .... ..... I don't know, but they do not have brain ya!
hedleypanama 1 year ago
I love you!
Quionic7 1 year ago
4452 subs - You ROCK!
sjuas690 1 year ago
Your comparison of subscribers is flawed. A lot of their subscribers are atheists who want to laugh at them and to make pwnage videos.
bdf2718 1 year ago
Gimme some subscribers!
JRChadwick 1 year ago
I am well pleased to be one of your subs.
claudiaquat 1 year ago
COOL VIDEO. No wonder you have more subscribers. You actually know what the fuck you are talking about. My Subs added if I have not already. In Comradeship. Science Rocks, Morons Sux
franks2732 1 year ago
LOL Discovery Institute.
More like the Casey Luskin Foundation for Sophistry and Censorship AMIRITE
Nice one Q.
AndromedasWake 1 year ago 19
I tried to watch a couple of the DI videos, they're so BORING!!!!! Just regurgitating the same old shite.
wordavee 1 year ago
@wordavee Dude, you should try listening to the podcast. It is narrated by Luskin.
kingsdun 1 year ago
You are mistaken in your count of subscribers - you will have to add mine now.
revjimbob 1 year ago
I love when Q slaps fools with his gigantic balls.
JBSauce 1 year ago 9
LOLOL!!
nishbrown 1 year ago
Good vid, keep those bastards honest!
lilililililililiilii 1 year ago
Elbow. From. THE SKY! :D
Take THAT, Discovery Institute!
BionicDance 1 year ago
QD is the man .
ComradeAgopian 1 year ago
Just a quick request. Can any tell me what the Discovery Institute has ever discovered?
Please be sure to site their reference and peer reviews if you give me a journal which as almost to no peer review process this will not be valid.
thorspower 1 year ago
Good video sir!
kalsolarUK 1 year ago
you ROCK mate!!!!
upublic 1 year ago
I didn't even know the DI was on youtube. Excellent. Time to subscribe to their channel and piss myself laughing at their arguments.
EssentialPedagogy 1 year ago
A face for radio and a voice for writing books (lol.. i like it when people have self-deprecation)
SjoerdvdKroon 1 year ago
@SjoerdvdKroon
It shows good character.
EssentialPedagogy 1 year ago
Nice bit of pwnage again Mr. QD.
neilswann80 1 year ago
4,453
mrmyxlptlk 1 year ago
4,453
mrmyxlptlk 1 year ago
Face for radio and a voice for writing books.
That made me laugh.
=)
DwayneJKing 1 year ago
"A face for radio, and a voice for writing books" Oh god I lol'd hard
InvertedHorizon 1 year ago 3
Good work
no1saphead 1 year ago
Great powage Q, great powage!
mdgraden 1 year ago
Nice comment, well said. Now that I know they are here, I am so keeping my eyes on them.
dannypantsgm 1 year ago
You deserve a thousand blowjobs for what you do. I'm not going to be the one to give them to you, cause I'm not into that kinda think, but I hear DonExodus2 might be willing. haha. Keep up the good work!
Cubanatheist 1 year ago
QD you are a youtube god.
RDJim 1 year ago
I went to the video and asked them to answer the first question posted on the thread by qdragon1337. It can't hurt, right? The next time you leave a question you should make a video asking everyone to go to the video & either request they answer qdragon or have everyone copy, paste & ask the same question... might be funny to see how it turns out
sheri226 1 year ago
"good call, I mean.
photodube 1 year ago
Nothing surprising about it - the facts fly in the face of their baseless assertions, which leaves them no alternative but to censor. You call doing the screen capture.
photodube 1 year ago
I got 154 subs -- :( I suck more than DI :( this makes me sad
UberLogic 1 year ago
Here is a "The Simpsons" style "ha ha" for the Discovery Institute.
Ha Ha.
TIPinkUnicorn 1 year ago
Hey Dragon, they've gotten 10 more subs since you made the vid. That's 10 people who only subscribed to raze them every time they make a new video! keep it up!
TheBetterGame 1 year ago
a face for radio and a voice for writing books! you are so clever! :D
holymoose69 1 year ago 2
Good work Agent Q :)
starfedrogue 1 year ago
lol..you're quite intelligent with a sense of sarcastic humor I like;)
DInstitute fail.
blaziermissy 1 year ago
I am subscribed to them for the lols.. and it's very likely half of their subsribers do it for the lols. Btw, I took part to that discussion lol
labrat882 1 year ago
I <3 you, stay rational
0neDose 1 year ago
The Discovery Institute is a sham, a con job to get money from the gullible theists. They do no real research, no experiments, and no field work. There entire budget seems to be focused on trying to convince the public and politcians to support their cause. After the trial in Dover, PA their real face was shown.
TheAvengingAtheist 1 year ago
Nice to see a vid from you again kiddo. Been a while. I kinda missed ya.
You are looking pink and healthy too. A good sign that I should ecpect more vids :D
You are right though, I expected more from you than to play the "subs" card. But you did, you scumhole! I would have thought a logical mind like yours might have realised the futility. You might as well point out the difference in sales between the works of Charles Darwin and the works of Rhold Dhall!
richieblackhearted 1 year ago
Qdragon, you have that many subscribers because (1) you've got brains and (2) you've got balls. Still a fan of you mailing holy miracle water to Kent Hovind in jail. Oh yea... didn't you call Casey Luskin, the moron behind the Discovery Institute?
EcrossH 1 year ago
A face for radio, a voice for writing books, AND BALLS FOR DEMOLISHING SKYSCRAPERS.
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago 71
I find it interesting, and sad that the DI even has 654 subscribers...
CharBroiled04 1 year ago
@CharBroiled04 I have over 872 ;)
dangerouslytalented 1 year ago
@CharBroiled04 But a number of the 654 are atheists looking for a laugh.
ctypro96706 1 year ago
@ctypro96706
That's reassuring. :)
CharBroiled04 1 year ago
Totally Awesome!!!
Keep up the GREAT work!!!
SETIat1420MHz 1 year ago
Excellent video!
Hetobox 1 year ago
My brother is a financial supporter of the Discovery Institute plus he is gay. Not that that is a problem, just think that gay Creationists are probably rare.
goosed1 1 year ago
Atheists tend to be better at figuring these computer things out lol
nekotenma 1 year ago
Are you raising hell again with that Discovery Institute??
Can't you just leave them alone!!
Leave the Discovery institute Alone!
Leave 'em ALONE!! *sniff* They only have 654 subscribers!!
....waahhhaaa
fonna 1 year ago
@fonna Thanks for the share hon :) I'm happy you haven't forgotten me!
MasterOhSo 1 year ago
wow, good vid qdragon1337;)
bubbamickmac 1 year ago
How does a comment get flagged for spam when it was posted 4 seconds ago?
mickyd47 1 year ago
Reading your comments now. :)
naughtypagan72 1 year ago
First! Thumbs up for me! Thumbs up for you! Thumbs up for QDragon!
truvelocity 1 year ago