OMNI-SCIENCE trounces Creationism - Anthony Marr

[jcmmanuel]

The difference between supernatural and natural (end of the vid) is not tenable anymore as far as I know. Especially not since quantum uncertainty demonstrated how physics (that is: physical, not meta-physical) cannot be defined completely within the realm of reason, experiment, logic. Mathematics itself already reached its limits long ago (Gödel). In spite of these flaws (as I see it), your goal seems to be justified. But saving the planet does not necessitate this worldview.

[kewltony]

@jcmmanuel "Especially not since quantum uncertainty demonstrated how physics (that is: physical, not meta-physical) cannot be defined completely within the realm of reason, experiment, logic." No.

[jcmmanuel]

"trounces creationism"? Creationism is not science of course (in the normal definition of it) but "social molecules"? That's certainly no science either. It reminds of Dawkins' "selfish genes" - does not exist. Any scientists knows that a gene is just a piece of information long enough to have a function. But maybe you are not just up to some atheist rhetoric here, I should read the book to be sure. Wonder if this is scientific like, say, Lynn Margullis' book Symbiotic Planet.