Added: 3 years ago
From: RouterJunkie
Views: 21,647
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Technically, this true if people understand fabric here. MX is not core routing, it was edge routing

  • Shame on you, Cisco. This and youtube.com/watch?v=7rFbH5X-NY­A are prime examples of your dirty marketing. High-quality videos from users with no uploads except for these? Whom are you trying to fool here?

  • JUNIPER FTW

  • lool itd cisco bitchslapping juniper

  • people pleaz drop the key words and buzz words. you all sound like retards - round-robin fabric, backbone retard you are all just STUPID PEOPLE using buzzwords WEEEEEEE!!!!! you people need to get a life

  • For sure propaganda against Juniper as it is capturing most of cisco market. Infact in Service Provider Cisco Routers even took more than 1 week to update its internet routing table.

  • who made this video by the way,????? is someone out there finding faults of juniper both in their routers and customer support...

  • Wow, massive unpredictable packet loss! Sound VERY scary. Must be true of course since it comes from the impartial party - Cisco Systems!

  • This video has several key words such as "Integrated Services", which is a cisco key word they use to describe their enterprise routers such as 3800 series 2800 series routers. What cisco fails to understand and the reason why they lost almost all ISP market share is that core routers should not be running a firewall. They should be pumping packets at an insane rate, and Juniper mx series routers do it 3 times faster than anything cisco has.

  • what about cisco's nexus platform?

  • I actually like the nexus platform. But I don;t see that being used much in ISP's Although I have set them up in an ASP environment.

  • @bufo333

    3x faster and 5x cheaper than Cisco

  • Work for Cisco Much?

  • This is the stupidest thing i've ever seen.

    1) There's nothing wrong with round-robin fabric scheduling on the ingress, so long as it operates at line-rate (which it does)

    2) The multicast limitation may be real.. but backbone routers don't receive more than a few megabits of multicast traffic in the first place - otherwise the premise of multicast is negated

    3) A backbone router has no place doing lawful intercept - use passive optical taps

    This is pure propaganda. boooo!

  • What truly doesn't make sense is for 40gb of traffic arriving on ingress of 10GigE... what's wrong with this video?

  • @rrb1337 I agree with your 150%... Not to mention the Juniper SRX5800 has integrated services and achieved around 30Gb/s of IPS throughput.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more