lets buy 28k worth of camera gear, leave the rear lens cap off set it up and then lets leave the shutter open with out a body cap..... honestly go buy a car
The Leica S2 SLR Digital Camera offers the incredible imaging quality of digital medium-format in a compact ergonomic design. Employing a large 30x45mm CCD sensor, the S2 captures 37.5 megapixel files in the classic 3:2 ratio. Designed to offer maximum resolution in a convenient form factor, the body is similar in form to a modern ...
For more details please copy the Amazon link below in your browser:
so what's the point with this?? a camera is not going to be better because of it's price... and a real photographer knows that. A real photographer won't buy this mockery even if they get a lot of money from a photoshoot. good luck for Leica owners, they are making money thanks to ignorant people who think having lots of money will make them a better persons.
if i had this kind of money i would spend it on a pro full frame camera. The sensor here is too huge and you have to step down the aperture a lot. Also i don't think it has a good iso performance nor a good speed.
1) Leica should never have told you the price of this camera prior to the review. It would have been a much better review, had you not known.
2) Related to #1, most folks commenting are ridiculing the camera based on the price alone. I guess that understandable since you really never explained "why" the camera is as pricey as it is. After all, you do keep emphasizing the price.
3) You never posted your images as promised. What happened?
No live view..limited to 4 lenses without any ZOOMS!, crap high ISO performance in low light conditions...even if it has an awesome Kodak sensor and amazing lens quality...are they and is it really worth its asking price?.....a spare battery charger cost $400!.....face it this camera is PURELY for the 'open top Bentley brigade' who have more money than sense...
@MrCOLTSR2 Either that, or it's for people who don't shoot zooms because they're mostly crap. People that don't give a fuck about high ISOs because they shoot in a studio. Basically, people that aren't caught up in marketing hype and know what features actually count.
Also, I assume that people who buy this camera plan on making money with it, so obviously the price is less of an object to them as well.
Nobody is forcing you to buy this camera. So stop pretending your opinion is relevant.
considering its so expensive it looks very plain , not very ergonomic & basic when compared to other pro cameras...if this was not priced so high people would say its shit!....its the same with the big blads and 645d's ...its reverse psychology..price the fuckers so expensive people will all join the bandwagon & say wow..it must be fuckin good!....yeh its an ok camera but apart from the huge sensor its just a basic boring looking, limited featured overpriced, over-hyped ugly looking camera.
What an overblown piece of bad interface... Leica people have a problem with their own policy... get over it and design cameras with a decent functionaliy;; see Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Olympus, anyone! please..
To put the body opened for so many minutes.... You are NOT a professional !!! The amount of dust that is going inside is huge!!! I am very disappointed by this.
Damn son, you was talking about you can't buy it and then you just flop a m9 on the table haha why would you even buy it if you could if they send you new ones all the time lmao ^_^
you seem quite flattered by a $22,000 Leica and started undermining other top of the range DSLRs in the market. Lets say if someone has saved $22,000 and not rich but still wanted to buy a camera, he would buy a pro canon or nikon body with best nikorr or canon lenses for best results.
Seems like you have been complaining about why every car lover was supposed to have a Buggati Veyron and not some readily available sports car in the market.
@kaisar1 I see your point and it is valid, but you can not compare to the leica glass and a huge sensor to the small 35mm sensor and top nikon or canon lenses.
Simple. Choose between a car or this camera. If you make "some" money shooting photos, why not? Eventually, it will pay off. A car, well, gas+registration+insurance+tuneups, etc.... get the point?
One camera for most everything, except Pro Sport photography. But on the other hand sports photographers a long time ago use to use a twin lens which was about the same fps, right? I think I would use the S2 with sports photography lol :o).
" I would also like an option to combine pixels for faster shutter speed and higher quality Raw exposers with low light photography. I think a pro pro would save money with this camera, no need for two 35mm DSLRs and one or two Medium Formate DSLRs.
The sensor is almost as big as the screen on the back!!! No problem with Pixel Compression. I am lusting, while I save for the S?. "More lenses please Leica.
The sensor is almost as big as the screen on the back!!! No problem with Pixel Compression. I am lusting, while I save for the S?. "More lenses please leica.
seems like alot of people have never seen a mamiya and just have an slr. most people think this is a full frame dslr.
but guess what? there are sensors bigger than 24x36! they're called medium format cameras. so don't go batshit crazy why this camera cosrs somuch. besides, my friend has a $30000 hasselblad kit and runs a studio.
ever wonder what cameras they use in a studio that makes front page covers for magazines? a 5d won't cut it, but a large sensor would because of the better dynamic ra
where do i buy the camera stevehuff1969 im 14 years old dont be hateing on me i know im a spoild rich kid but im in photography an plz send me the link plz thx...
I really want this camera. This is worth more than my piano T^T
oh and it's pronounced "nee-kon". Doesn't matter what nationality you are there is only 1 pronounciation as it is Japanese :) But LEICA!!!! I WANT YOU D;
Is the camera $22,000 for its 37 megapixel, larger sensor than a full frame? because it is the most expensive DLSR I have ever seen! I like it only for the sensor, but if the sensor is bigger, how much mm do you get?
@albaraki I have a Panasonic Lumix FZ-50. It is essentially identical to the Leica V-lux. Optics and body are the same, the only difference is the software on the camera and the price: the Panasonic was ~$350-400 at the time I bought it while the Leica was ~$800.
I am a professional photographer and Contax RTS III, Contax 645, Yashica T4, and Leica R9 user and very much looking to purchase this new Leica if I can get just one extra photo job this year. Insanely beautiful camera.
There's a sucker born every minute... $6000 mamiya 645d blow that thing away don't be fooled by the leica badge it's just an very expensive slr with a 37.5mp sensor with no crop ability, whithout essential camera buttons like: iso or af selector, and which has less performance than a nikon d40
wow very very nice camera, but i just can't see where it is worth 22 grand. Yes it is nice and built great etc etc... , i would have guessed maybe 12-14 grand, anyway, no matter what, still is a cool camera. Someone told me, that there is a lens out there for 99,000, i would love to see the photos THAT lens took.
@stevehuff1969 What?? How do you compare image quality on digital sensor and a film? Digital had pixels but what does film have (apart from the chemicals that react)?
Hey im trying to follow u through your review in the next few days (omg ur soooo lucky), so i have some requests (if u take any) for example could you:
1- Testing F-number's, shooting the same scene with different f-number's
2- HDR's
3- Macro's, insects and flowers (close-ups)
4- Of course after ur desired tests on it
Steve, your the man =D and a humongous thank u for this video!
I played with this thing at PhotoExpo last year for about 10 mins. Despite the lack of controls on the camera, I found it extremely confusing to use. I guess it's a Leica thing? Who knows. Anyway, resolution is insane though. Nice video.
You could buy a red epic for that much
heyhey1385 4 days ago
@heyhey1385 Really where?
gsciorio 2 days ago
@gsciorio Woops i ment a scarlet
heyhey1385 2 days ago
arse-licker detected
IRobbedTheMafia 1 week ago
lets buy 28k worth of camera gear, leave the rear lens cap off set it up and then lets leave the shutter open with out a body cap..... honestly go buy a car
LowCountryWild 1 week ago
DISCOUNT LINK tiny.cc\oimci
Product Description
Leica S2
The Leica S2 SLR Digital Camera offers the incredible imaging quality of digital medium-format in a compact ergonomic design. Employing a large 30x45mm CCD sensor, the S2 captures 37.5 megapixel files in the classic 3:2 ratio. Designed to offer maximum resolution in a convenient form factor, the body is similar in form to a modern ...
For more details please copy the Amazon link below in your browser:
tiny.cc\oimci
presdupuitsfm 1 week ago
Menu system is pretty horrible ... don't care what you say about "simplicity"
ksearles85 2 weeks ago
Better Than getting a Hasselblad.
TheDJHcOre 2 weeks ago
Hasselblad H4d-31 has a bigger sensor and costs 15000 dollars less with lens....nobody would ever need this camera if they knew what they were doing.
kangaroo303 3 weeks ago 2
@kangaroo303 well, not the landscape or studio photographers that he mentioned anyways...
kangaroo303 3 weeks ago
great for stupid rich people :)
so what's the point with this?? a camera is not going to be better because of it's price... and a real photographer knows that. A real photographer won't buy this mockery even if they get a lot of money from a photoshoot. good luck for Leica owners, they are making money thanks to ignorant people who think having lots of money will make them a better persons.
SirLinkoln 3 weeks ago
What about that revie you wanted to do after this video???
eireannsg 3 weeks ago
And the sample images always show that bit of red on them because when it comes to red Leica shines.
eireannsg 3 weeks ago
So why would someone buy this? Is this better than the Nikon D3S? I think this is just to show that someone got excess of money.
appacana 1 month ago
sigh. such a bad review.
Shibamobobo 1 month ago
DUST ON THE SENSOR.
anythingbutcommon 1 month ago
Steve you've disappointed me.
thenewdesignone 1 month ago 4
if i had this kind of money i would spend it on a pro full frame camera. The sensor here is too huge and you have to step down the aperture a lot. Also i don't think it has a good iso performance nor a good speed.
zangounette 1 month ago
i got all my high end canon gear at the half of the price of this camera, and my customer happy with my work, it pay my bills.. less is more.
einazizan 1 month ago
This camera is a pro camera which will fire out some of the best RAW files ever captured.
It cost peanuts if it is a pro photo company who's buying it. Tax right off, and a steady return from it through studio hire alone.
It's in a different league to Canon and Nikon and its nothing to do with price.
It is god.
breakit46 1 month ago
1) Leica should never have told you the price of this camera prior to the review. It would have been a much better review, had you not known.
2) Related to #1, most folks commenting are ridiculing the camera based on the price alone. I guess that understandable since you really never explained "why" the camera is as pricey as it is. After all, you do keep emphasizing the price.
3) You never posted your images as promised. What happened?
flatspinach 1 month ago
Comment removed
patio87 1 month ago
great review
00frozenzoo00 1 month ago
Too much--in a few years it will be less than...way less than it's worth-over price!!!
patsjazzpix 2 months ago
imagine if it could shoot video.
DCassidy42 2 months ago
its an excellent camera but not worth $22,000.
sdeary1 2 months ago 4
@sdeary1 Its called diminishing return.
madrush999 1 month ago
id just buy a hasselblad , pointless spending that much on something that is like a medium format camera...
stuartibanez 2 months ago
In ten years this will be worth $500
SuperJerkyBoys 2 months ago
like if you prefer the m9
iSaadG1994Eqla3 2 months ago 56
@iSaadG1994Eqla3 for free
CalebFilmsPresent 2 months ago
@CalebFilmsPresent xD me too
iSaadG1994Eqla3 2 months ago
where is the full review ?!!
onlineahmeds 3 months ago
1DX is way better than this plus you can get all some L lenses and you would still save a bunch :P
pickachukabalooie 3 months ago
"when you hold it, it does not feel cheap at all"...thats because its fucking $22,000. For that much money it better fuckin right feel good.
nicholo85 3 months ago
There's people that make $110,000 a year working with these, it's like buying a car. People have priorities, I'm looking into a 60d.
CrappyVlog 4 months ago
*drool*
sopimusician666 4 months ago
No live view..limited to 4 lenses without any ZOOMS!, crap high ISO performance in low light conditions...even if it has an awesome Kodak sensor and amazing lens quality...are they and is it really worth its asking price?.....a spare battery charger cost $400!.....face it this camera is PURELY for the 'open top Bentley brigade' who have more money than sense...
MrCOLTSR2 4 months ago
@MrCOLTSR2 Either that, or it's for people who don't shoot zooms because they're mostly crap. People that don't give a fuck about high ISOs because they shoot in a studio. Basically, people that aren't caught up in marketing hype and know what features actually count.
Also, I assume that people who buy this camera plan on making money with it, so obviously the price is less of an object to them as well.
Nobody is forcing you to buy this camera. So stop pretending your opinion is relevant.
manusdextra 2 months ago
Can you upload some full rez pics?
BadBootyShakanosis 4 months ago
its ugly !
0999386161 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrCOLTSR2 4 months ago
considering its so expensive it looks very plain , not very ergonomic & basic when compared to other pro cameras...if this was not priced so high people would say its shit!....its the same with the big blads and 645d's ...its reverse psychology..price the fuckers so expensive people will all join the bandwagon & say wow..it must be fuckin good!....yeh its an ok camera but apart from the huge sensor its just a basic boring looking, limited featured overpriced, over-hyped ugly looking camera.
MrCOLTSR2 4 months ago
Oh my god... I want one.... but so unachievable.
MobiusCoin 5 months ago
incredible how there are so few buttons
MastrBlastr318 5 months ago
How does this compare to Pentax 645D?
dvamateur 5 months ago
SEND TO ME!
Want my adress...?
RoadtripsInFinland 6 months ago
You have to be rich and stupid to prefer this over a, say, Pentax 645D... really..
Rwmhos 6 months ago
What an overblown piece of bad interface... Leica people have a problem with their own policy... get over it and design cameras with a decent functionaliy;; see Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Olympus, anyone! please..
Rwmhos 6 months ago
I spent $4500 on an Olympus E-30 system with 4 lenses and a flash. Pffft.
Pighood 6 months ago
brigidik... bruguduk...
penuli5 6 months ago
I don't think anyone who's going to drop 22 grand on a camera needs to be told to turn it on
TheHeadhunter 6 months ago
i wouldnt buy this even i was rich! my canon d40 can take as good photos as this and yes i have used this camera
Pier2pie 7 months ago
must be competing against Nikon. never mentions canon. hmmmmm
820e4cf7jh 7 months ago
To put the body opened for so many minutes.... You are NOT a professional !!! The amount of dust that is going inside is huge!!! I am very disappointed by this.
Pulsar28 7 months ago
It's a beautiful camera. [:
iArthurXDD 7 months ago
It's maximum shutter speed is 1/4000 sec?? but then what's its continuous frame rate a sec????
BlackArmy6 7 months ago
Did you just open the shutter exposing that gigantic sensor to all the dust in the room? I wouldn't have the balls to do that.
chessami92 8 months ago
Too Expensive.
tanouetohru 8 months ago
the battery is like a clip in a gun. haha
UprightBassAddict 9 months ago
puting off the battery is like reloading a gun..!!
matthewblessssss 9 months ago
My God... the glory of this camera...
AETrainingDavid97 9 months ago
$22,000 BS thats a crock i could of grabbed one from ebay for $2,000 new cond from france
ScottJamesLewisNJ 9 months ago
Damn son, you was talking about you can't buy it and then you just flop a m9 on the table haha why would you even buy it if you could if they send you new ones all the time lmao ^_^
Recon9143 9 months ago
you seem quite flattered by a $22,000 Leica and started undermining other top of the range DSLRs in the market. Lets say if someone has saved $22,000 and not rich but still wanted to buy a camera, he would buy a pro canon or nikon body with best nikorr or canon lenses for best results.
Seems like you have been complaining about why every car lover was supposed to have a Buggati Veyron and not some readily available sports car in the market.
kaisar1 9 months ago 26
@kaisar1 I agree. Nissan GTR!
diciannove1100 1 month ago
@kaisar1 I see your point and it is valid, but you can not compare to the leica glass and a huge sensor to the small 35mm sensor and top nikon or canon lenses.
MrYerbaMate1 2 weeks ago
@MrYerbaMate1 Well said sir.
TheDJHcOre 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is the name of the opening song?
oliverjackhoward 10 months ago
What is the name of this song?
oliverjackhoward 10 months ago
Comment removed
Rococo0815 11 months ago
Simple. Choose between a car or this camera. If you make "some" money shooting photos, why not? Eventually, it will pay off. A car, well, gas+registration+insurance+tuneups, etc.... get the point?
If you want it, go for it. Life is short!
GAMMAliciouz 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
id rather watch this than porn
Rococo0815 11 months ago
One camera for most everything, except Pro Sport photography. But on the other hand sports photographers a long time ago use to use a twin lens which was about the same fps, right? I think I would use the S2 with sports photography lol :o).
PhotographerMN 11 months ago
" I would also like an option to combine pixels for faster shutter speed and higher quality Raw exposers with low light photography. I think a pro pro would save money with this camera, no need for two 35mm DSLRs and one or two Medium Formate DSLRs.
PhotographerMN 11 months ago
The sensor is almost as big as the screen on the back!!! No problem with Pixel Compression. I am lusting, while I save for the S?. "More lenses please Leica.
PhotographerMN 11 months ago
The sensor is almost as big as the screen on the back!!! No problem with Pixel Compression. I am lusting, while I save for the S?. "More lenses please leica.
PhotographerMN 11 months ago
money is a paper only so buy it :D
pogiryan27 11 months ago
You keep talking about how the build quality is superb, and it's extremely solid. I WOULD EXPECT SO FOR $22,000.
TheRealrocker74 1 year ago
lets see...camera or BMW, decisions decisions...
touchinpun 1 year ago
Just bought this today :) then my girlfriend woke me up...
MIkeness101 1 year ago
не реально дорого((((((( А чья тема играет?
poparazzi0 1 year ago
30k? wtf man?! this thing made of pure heroin or something?
desmonds22 1 year ago
seems like alot of people have never seen a mamiya and just have an slr. most people think this is a full frame dslr.
but guess what? there are sensors bigger than 24x36! they're called medium format cameras. so don't go batshit crazy why this camera cosrs somuch. besides, my friend has a $30000 hasselblad kit and runs a studio.
ever wonder what cameras they use in a studio that makes front page covers for magazines? a 5d won't cut it, but a large sensor would because of the better dynamic ra
HelloNewYorkCity 1 year ago
where do i buy the camera stevehuff1969 im 14 years old dont be hateing on me i know im a spoild rich kid but im in photography an plz send me the link plz thx...
zxcv1789 1 year ago
@zxcv1789
google . com
iliketojumplargeobje 1 year ago
yes it does look nice but the new RED SLR looks ten times better
highcolestrol 1 year ago
I really want this camera. This is worth more than my piano T^T
oh and it's pronounced "nee-kon". Doesn't matter what nationality you are there is only 1 pronounciation as it is Japanese :) But LEICA!!!! I WANT YOU D;
xxgwyloxx 1 year ago
what's the background music? Thanks.
vyvyvy123 1 year ago
@vyvyvy123 its sounds like its from this music. type in nature morte mv and it should be the first video
TheJimmyAndCo 1 year ago
what the fuck ! Leica insane , make a Euros 9k Compact Camera and Euros 20 K DSLR !
jacklimsws 1 year ago
$27,995.00...
Karargah 1 year ago
Its fun
DSLR Full fr max 8000$
Middle format on Mamya 10-15 000 $
this camera have not customer
...and too many noise on 800iso...but 37mp
tvleonid 1 year ago
say it back to yourself, that camera is 30 grand. geezuz
MIkeness101 1 year ago
"... Which is kinda like matrix"
fladfisk 1 year ago
Is the camera $22,000 for its 37 megapixel, larger sensor than a full frame? because it is the most expensive DLSR I have ever seen! I like it only for the sensor, but if the sensor is bigger, how much mm do you get?
cubeproduktion 1 year ago
@cubeproduktion it's a medium format camera. they're usually way more expensive than your usual canon or nikon.
143mark6275 1 year ago
@cubeproduktion there's a mamiya ranging the 35.000
Dreadfultime 1 year ago
why so pricy?. it looks like a toy.
sirnubenegra 1 year ago
UUUUUUUU, open that shutter for me
13vafanculo 1 year ago
ok now let's try the drop test
witonohalim 1 year ago
22k $ for the body only !!
Leica is taking the prices way far . .
I love Leica M cameras . . and I find it difficult even with their 6k $ price hard to justify the price with the output of the camera . .
Now, let''s keep our feelings and passion out . .
What makes this S2 better than Nikon D3S or D3X or Canon Mark?!
Built quality? how better? i doubt it's that noticeable difference, as Nikon and Canon use weather sealed magnesium bodies.
Low light performance?! i doubt it.
So what is it?
albaraki 1 year ago
@albaraki I have a Panasonic Lumix FZ-50. It is essentially identical to the Leica V-lux. Optics and body are the same, the only difference is the software on the camera and the price: the Panasonic was ~$350-400 at the time I bought it while the Leica was ~$800.
falcoperegrinus82 1 year ago
OH MY GOSH, What an amazingly big Sensor! :o
OlliTheAwesomeone 1 year ago
Wheres the review?
ryowxyz 1 year ago
If I'm rich I'll buy it yes.... but I'm not.
lekotar 1 year ago 32
@lekotar If you are healthy you are more rich than you can ever wonder.
helthuismartin 3 months ago
Comment removed
Colariboo 1 year ago
How do i get Leica to send me one of those for review?
JogBird 1 year ago
it better be good cuz its fucking worth mroe than my car lmao
Neyteri 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sold. i'll go and get one tomorrow
okoyum 1 year ago
send it to me, ill do a review on it. ill give it back......eventually
ithree6mafia 1 year ago
damn this shit costs more than my house
mglsotto 1 year ago
I am a professional photographer and Contax RTS III, Contax 645, Yashica T4, and Leica R9 user and very much looking to purchase this new Leica if I can get just one extra photo job this year. Insanely beautiful camera.
ianvlokewurth 1 year ago
Excellent informative review!! Beautifully made also.
ianvlokewurth 1 year ago
the m9 looks stunning , i'd rather have that
flappospammo 1 year ago
best Camera ever
profineger 1 year ago
nice camera!!
can you tell me whats the intro song or music called?
hunsua 1 year ago
25,000 camera wow
uhmmm thats boring
emtep 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There's a sucker born every minute... $6000 mamiya 645d blow that thing away don't be fooled by the leica badge it's just an very expensive slr with a 37.5mp sensor with no crop ability, whithout essential camera buttons like: iso or af selector, and which has less performance than a nikon d40
nainladen 1 year ago
That leica will only be brought by rich idiots,
Not by real pros
The H4D is a far better alternative
What are you going to reply to that stevenhuff???
nainladen 1 year ago
@nainladen Stop trolling. I mean sure, you have a point, but you're ruining the value of that by being a dick.
manusdextra 1 year ago
@manusdextra
suck me
;-)
nainladen 1 year ago
@nainladen Why did I expect a rational reply?
manusdextra 1 year ago
@manusdextra
Cuz you are dumb
;-)
nainladen 1 year ago
@nainladen How old are you?
manusdextra 1 year ago
@manusdextra
im a troll of
about 10,000 years old
for the exact age
ASK YOUR MOM!
;-)
nainladen 1 year ago
@nainladen So, what, 12?
manusdextra 1 year ago
wow very very nice camera, but i just can't see where it is worth 22 grand. Yes it is nice and built great etc etc... , i would have guessed maybe 12-14 grand, anyway, no matter what, still is a cool camera. Someone told me, that there is a lens out there for 99,000, i would love to see the photos THAT lens took.
unlocked1evil1 1 year ago
Build quality is better then M9? The buttons, grip, filling?
The picture quality on ISO 100-200-400 in maximum resolution is better then pictures taken with an M7 with good quality films?
dragosselaru 2 years ago
Yes and YES
stevehuff1969 2 years ago 5
@stevehuff1969 What?? How do you compare image quality on digital sensor and a film? Digital had pixels but what does film have (apart from the chemicals that react)?
ajayalmighty 7 months ago
@dragosselaru but the prices its about 27 or 37k
drake1990 1 year ago
@dragosselaru "Build quality is better then M9?"
Cute question ;)
Kodachi123 1 year ago
@dragosselaru remember youre comparing a medium format camera to a 35mm...... ofcourse the 35mm will lose
ichirootaniguchi 9 months ago
Hey im trying to follow u through your review in the next few days (omg ur soooo lucky), so i have some requests (if u take any) for example could you:
1- Testing F-number's, shooting the same scene with different f-number's
2- HDR's
3- Macro's, insects and flowers (close-ups)
4- Of course after ur desired tests on it
Steve, your the man =D and a humongous thank u for this video!
linezero3 2 years ago
Well, the S2 can not do Macro without a macro lens :) Also, I do not do HDR (the S2 files do not need it as there is so much DR anyway) - Thanks!
stevehuff1969 2 years ago 6
@stevehuff1969
Hahahaha so.. to be more technical..... you are saying that........that camera don't have any exposure bracketing??
nainladen 1 year ago
Comment removed
linezero3 2 years ago
generally a good demonstration of the camera, however, it's not "like" medium format..it IS medium format. :)
DoubleTwistingDouble 2 years ago
Well technically it is a bit smaller than other MF digital sensors. Not by much, and yes, it is still considered MF. Thanks
stevehuff1969 2 years ago
your video has a very cool shallow depth of field
JGTRA 2 years ago
Shot it with the Pentax K7 and kit zoom :)
stevehuff1969 2 years ago
dam like 30 grand....better be taking pictures of jesus or something
buckamoona 2 years ago 63
I played with this thing at PhotoExpo last year for about 10 mins. Despite the lack of controls on the camera, I found it extremely confusing to use. I guess it's a Leica thing? Who knows. Anyway, resolution is insane though. Nice video.
ApexIXMR 2 years ago
OMG LUST!!!
CrazyJimKU 2 years ago