what was that? a 5.0 with an intake and exhaust yet has a MASSIVE tach and tires? He must've been saving for a big block lol. Kudos to the mustang for keeping up with not much done to it and having to turn big drag tires at god knows how many miles.
dud with the stang im lol at you. great lookin car but runs like stock. make it fast first then looks! looks like a 9 sec car but loses to a 350z. lmao come on guy. do a dig run thats the stangs strong point.
Did I say America couldn't hit 100p per liter? No..NeWSfLAsh buddy..if you were smart youd have listed the zr1 and gt500s which both have 100hp per liter(with superchargers) and are American cars..since 100/200/300hp per liter has been demonstrated possible ANY car company can..it's the ones that do it though, I've yet to see an American car make 100hp/liter stock naturally aspriated...
@baudchaser that's why I planted the magical word "IF"...I know it's impossible as of now to add cylinders to a already running motor and I know Nissan did not put enough room in the block to accommodate 1300ccs more of displacement...having 100hp/liter does not mean the engine is "tapped out" lol..I got 70 more hp n/a from my already 100hp per liter motor and could still make more...dont insinuate I don't know what I'm talking about because I talk hypothetically, I know my shit..I built my car
It better beat that mustang considering is newer and has more power, but alot of you forget that when u want to go fast for cheap an old pushrod 5.0 mustang will get you the best bang for buck, if ur really on a budget u can pull junkyard gt40 iron heads , stock cobra intake and a ford racing cam and that combo puts most 5.0s into the 260rwhp range without even tuning the computer, $200 for heads,199 for cam and 300 for intake, for around 700 bucks u got a high 12 or mid 13 second car.
@fullmetaljacktt Plenty of fox body mustangs have done it, and i said high 12s and thats probably with slicks and some weight reduction but 13s are normal for a fox mustang with that much power, u do know a fox mustang is lighter than a 350z.
@cubano1389 ah well you failed to mention the slicks and weight reduction you just said heads, intake and cam which would be amazing to get into the 12s with considering most stock fox stangs start in mid to low 14s
@fullmetaljacktt Well dont think that one without slicks wont get into the 12s , but even without removing weight and putting slicks a fox stang with those mods i mentioned will get into the 13s, and yes they start out around 14s when all u have is basic boltons. A lot of people think 5.0s suck becuase they produced poor power but they forget that these engines had horrible heads from the factory. If u can afford it u can get aluminium heads and the car will get into 12s easy.
@cubano1389 Yea but a set of heads like that is going to cost you twice what you were talking about not to mention the labor if you can't install it yourself. Plus my guess is the heads alone will only get you to mid 13's maybe.
@fullmetaljacktt Sometimes u can find used aluminum pieces for half the price, and installing heads on a 5.0 ford is easy compared to engines like the 4.6 . Kid you not but i have seen fox get into the 13s without changing the stock heads or cam, with bolt ons only . U have to be a really good driver and have a light car also. Also if u are good at porting u can port the gt40 iron heads and get some good flow out of them.
and if my mustang had a jet engine it would have better weight to HP ratio, get back on the point the 370 doesn't have a v8, the mustang is at least 10 years old, 5.0 back then were not pumping out HP like they are today. the 370 might have been in the lead, but in my mind lost the shit out of that race by a toddler with a backwards cap
@erday no shit a bigger motor with 2 more cylinders would be faster...if the vq37 was the same size as the 5.0 it would make more power and torque that's why I said that..I could give a shit if the new 5.0 is faster than a 370z I think they're gay..I'm faster than both of those cars and whatever you drive..you're just too slow to understand concepts like hp/liter and tq/liter
@willizim exactly, thank you for proving my point..think about it, the 370z motor outperforms the new 5.0... 2 less cylinders and closer to 100hp per liter.. 3.7L-333hp 5.0L-420hp so scale the 3.7L up 1L keeping this ratio it would make at least 433hp as a 4.7L v6 if not more... Still 300ccs smaller than the 5.0 2 less cylinders and 13hp more..the vq35 is a better motor than the new 5.0, thank you for proving my point.
@CivicSIEm1 Except that you can't simply "keep" the ratio & up the number of cylinders. It doesn't work that way. Smaller displacement can always rev easier due to less reciprocating mass! American manufacturers (and everybody else who knows what they're talking about) know this. They KNOWINGLY sacrifice HP/L for low-end power. If they wanted HP/L, they could certainly do it. News flash - America is NOT taxed on engine size, thus, HP/L means jack shit. I drive an 07 350z...so...not biased.
@baptistchristian1992 Weight diff... you put a fat guy against a skinny guy who's gunna win? No No make that an 40 year old fat guy vs a 20 year old skinny :) and on the topic iv raced ricers in my 88 and fucked them up so yup 6 races won and only raced 6 times do the math.
Any motor has potential...I hate to say I but you could take a 60s vw bug or a Kia rio or just the shittiest car you can imagine and make it the fastest..ANY car has potential so of course 5Ls is potential, ford just got nowhere close to the potential which is why its a pointless start in my book... I like starting with 100+hp/liter not less than 50hp/liter lol....and I like being under 3000lbs...something about light cars, they just handle better lol
@CivicSIEm1 The mustang is about power potential. It's for people who want to build the car into what they want with parts combos. It's not about Ford taking and putting in a tapped out motor that has very little potential left. You should know something about that driving a civic. Typically civics need motor swaps to be threats on the strip.
@CivicSIEm1 Your comparing old technology to new technology. How about comparing the new 5.0 to the new vq37hr if you really want apples to apples. Put them both against each other and see who wins. This is coming from a guy that had a g37 so, lol
@TheWeavert92 I'm no pro 350z homo, but you do realize that 3.5l v6 outperforms your 5.0l v8 stock for stock...the 5ls were overrated!! At 220bhp and matched, maybe more tq...350zs are around 260-270 bhp stock an more than 220tq lol...get the fuck outta here who would start with such a shitty foundation, that mustang was pointless let alone most.....
@4g63tballs so ill go out and get a picture for you then. in that picture you will see 2 turbo hondas, a 2g gst and a 2g gsx, and 1 2000 trans am. the 2 hondas are getting body and motor work, the 2 dsm's are getting new motor and shep trannies, and the trans am is still on the original motor andstock tranny, and its still faster than all 4 of the other cars
@TheWeavert92 You obviously don't have a 9 second car or any idea how much money it takes. 5 grand LOL, fuck I wish that were true. Try 10-15 to do it with quality parts and labor. Unless your a master mechanic like 99% of YouTube. Of course what do I know, I'm only a hydraulic engineer and lift mechanic, cars are my hobby not profession. That said ive built a few cars on my own and know the time and planning/money it takes to be fast.
@lighthead018 your wrong. i own ford and chevy performance vehicals and the 5.0 stang is one of the tuffest vehicals i ever owned. i beat on mine everday and it never skipped a beat. and mine wasnt stock either.
@Madalynfurr1 you get more respect in a classic than a new car.. Dont get me wrong i fucking love 350z's there in my top 3 but i love my fox and iv had it for only 3 months and already gott'N well over 200 comments about how awsome it is and how great it looks for an 88 i cant even drive down the fucking street without getting stopped and asked questions about it but yes 350s are the shit as well :)
@tuugfo A V8 is still a V8, end of story? That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard... By that logic, you're saying that the 1914 Cadillac type 51 motor should beat this 350z. Yes, the Caddy engine was a 315ci V8, but it only produced 70 horsepower. The technological advancements weren't made at the time to create optimal power from the engine. Even the 5.0 in this video pales in comparison to the technology put into this 350z even though they really weren't produced that far apart.
@08WhiteSi how about i compare cars 40 years apart??? ever go to the drag strip ever see a 70 chevelle, camaro, cuda or any muscle car run 11,10,9 hell even 8s in the quater? its all about money how can you not compare cars no matter how old they are?
Typical teenage fag with a 5.0. Does all the dress up- wheels, tires, paint, cowl hood, big tach etc- and doesn't mod the engine at all. So we have a sick, fast looking fox body that runs mid 14 1/4s. I'd beat this Mustang with my '92 convertible, stock looking car with nothing but Explorer upper/lower, pulleys and exhaust. I went 13.80s @ 100 mph on all season tires with the stock paper air filter, spare tire and jack in the trunk etc. '07+ 3.5 G and Z cars are only ~101 mph cars.
@joeyvillan I have done enough racing to tell by the look and sound that these cars are not very fast, how's that? And actually my Explorer setups go low 13s on 205/60R15 junk ass tires, and 12.70 - 12.80 with tire. Last car went 105 mph on motor in 110 degree heat, 5500 ft DA and 118 mph on bottle. I was into that car about $2500 including the cost of the car. Current car went 13.20 @ 107 with a 75 shot when it was complete stock. Paid $2600 for that one and it's pretty nice.
Nice job not wearing your seat belt mustang driver. Better hope you're ass is invincible because when that stang gets loose from your noob driving teenaged ass you're going to be in fucking trouble.
@SuperCoding Oh really? I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that a stock 370 ran 12s LOL. Ok? It's 2012, not 2010. the 5.0 will smoke that ass. Put a Stillen supercharger on the 370 and it would just beat the 5.0, but put a Kenne Bell on the 5.0 and it will make that blown 370 its bitch.
Bentley wilkinson- are you actually saying that aerodynamics have anything to do with a race at 55mph? That's retarded, that won't matter until about 100 at least. Even then not so much in this kind of race. The 5.0 had 225hp which is slow. Now with alum h/c/I+ full exhaust set up it'd be around 350hp and still be a 6-7k including the car. And good bye 25k 350z!
@Turbo05gt 55 mph?? They redlined 3rd and into 4th what the fuck do you know if you think top end of 3rd gear is 55mph?? That mustang is UGLY as fuck the Z looks 10x better. Mabey if you were'nt an idiot you would have the money for the Z!! And aerodynamics come into affect about 60 ish you dumb pos.
that's an abuse racing a 20 year old stock car with a modern car , I bet If you race the new 5.0 or the even the new v6 I bet your 350 will get blown .
@ChallengerGuy22 psht wonder how many mods that 350 z had to have to beat that 5.0 i know the cost of building that jap crap costs more than a ford 5.0 the most common ford engine out there next to the 4.6 that anybody can build and make it a 9 second car for under 5k american dollars.
@marcomariaz26 The Z is much newer what'd you expect? Hell there are plenty of old cars I can think of that a honda accord can beat, nothing to brag about.
@SC04Cobra i dont know if this is 100% true, but i remember reading somewhere that the 03 - 04 Cobras were actually underrated, and that they had 430 hp and 430 lb ft of torque.. again, i dont know if its 100% right, but i wouldnt doubt it either! those Cobras can run lol
I'm going to jump into the conv... Age does matter. For example, F1 cars of today perform faster with about 800 hp than they did two decades ago with 1000 hp.
The mustang stock is a 15.0 -14.80 second car that does not mph that good.....This car sounded pretty stock except for exhaust and probably a k&n so they are around the same...In the last race they raced from a dig and the 5.0 launched better than the Z and won.. In this race the 350z had mph on the 5.0 and won... soo the Z has better mph on the 5.0 and the 5.0 has better e.t. on the Z...either way it was a good race and both are nice looking cars ...
It's not about how old/new a car is or if it's "japcrap" or an "american lead-sled".
It's all about Power to Weight ratio and how to get that power into the ground, it's that simple. And when it comes to speeds over around 90km/h the aerodynamics will also be a big factor.
that wasnt really fair bc minus a full blown drag car with some well adjusted gears, above 120 or so you can smoke most 5.0's or any muscle car from that era. I'm not bashing. I owned a couple mustangs myself and currently drive a 08 NISMO Z, so in all fairness it was a good race. In turbo's defense though I will say he's right. I fuck around with my boy all the time and get pwned lol. but its still fun. lol
@Dallasmavs92 Age does matter actually, because technology evolves. 87-93 5.0 Mustangs came with 225hp from the factory, now look at the 2011 Mustang 5.0 pushing 412hp... If it was the 2011 5.0 vs. the 350z im sure there would be a different outcome.
@Dallasmavs92 Your an idiot just for saying that... A 2011 MUSTANG 5.0 has double the HP and would smoke that 3.5L inthis video.... Those old V-8s didn't breath and they were stuffed with smog BS.
kids man.... seriously, go to a race track and stop wearing your hat backwards... it only makes you look 16 and stupid. and this is coming from another mustang driver...
@steelstrings1312 C'mon man.. they're racing next to corn field lol give them a break. and I wear my hat backwards all the time to pick up highschool chicks. This is coming from another mustang driver... J/K on the highschool part lol
@steelstrings1312 Thats me buddy. Dont worry about my hat & i was 16, Id be more worried about going to the gym if i was you. You look like a goddam twig in your videos.
Oh lawd, "dont do small upgrades until you spend more money than what you can spend, man you really need to understand the winsor motors before you start smacking off LOL. Ever heard of room to grow? a cam can produce waay more torque and hp with a ton of room to grow once he gets heads, it makes that cam much better. He's not "Required" to do heads and other shit to install a cam man. Yeah easy power, room to grow. He's not choking the heads, hes actually helping the car breath
once you put some work into that 302, its gonna be fast. it makes alright torque outta the box but its shorted in the HP department. very light for a mustang and the motor has alot of potential.
@dbl0ck13 i know, i plan on finding a 90-92 5.0, first mods will probably be mickey thompson ET streets, better gears(probly 4.10), and a nice cam probably the b303. maybe a 2 step rev limiter, maybe not.
@need2speed94 i got a 86 Mustang gt, hard top. ive dont intake, maf conversion, a9L computer=91 gt computer, shorty headers, hpipe not cats dont ever have to go thru emissions again THANK GOD, flowmaster american thunder exhaust, 255/60/15 mickey thompson et's in the rear with a .25 wheel spacer, summit fast five rims, march underdrive racing pulleys, ram stg1 clutch, all i have left to do is gears got 3.08's in there from factory i want 3.73's,
@need2speed94 trust me dont install a cam on a 5.0 untill you change cylinder heads or port the exhaust bumps on the stock head,in my opinion everyone should port those bumps its the easiest mod.that and a b cam you will have the fastest bang for the buck car.(and 3.73s and mt tires
@xExRxIxCxKx bullshit, the z just had more hp in the top end. but btw torque plays a bigger factor at a drag strip than horsepower. im not sayin horsepower isnt cuz the z won because of hp but from a dig aka lining up at the strip. it takes torque to come outta the hole before anyone else
(F)ound (O)n (R)etard's (D)riveway
xkiller01x3pecx 8 hours ago
(F)agget (O)perated (R)oad (D)isaster
xkiller01x3pecx 8 hours ago
(F)ucked (O)ver (R)ebuilt (D)odge
xkiller01x3pecx 8 hours ago
at least the 'stang didn't sound like a pissed off weed whacker when it got going.
mebe2k 16 hours ago
dude ur name is soccerfreak. your clearly a fag. nuf said
GearHeadHick429 23 hours ago 2
what was that? a 5.0 with an intake and exhaust yet has a MASSIVE tach and tires? He must've been saving for a big block lol. Kudos to the mustang for keeping up with not much done to it and having to turn big drag tires at god knows how many miles.
RaudiAudiT 2 days ago
dud with the stang im lol at you. great lookin car but runs like stock. make it fast first then looks! looks like a 9 sec car but loses to a 350z. lmao come on guy. do a dig run thats the stangs strong point.
BLACKLACDTS 4 days ago
Did I say America couldn't hit 100p per liter? No..NeWSfLAsh buddy..if you were smart youd have listed the zr1 and gt500s which both have 100hp per liter(with superchargers) and are American cars..since 100/200/300hp per liter has been demonstrated possible ANY car company can..it's the ones that do it though, I've yet to see an American car make 100hp/liter stock naturally aspriated...
CivicSIEm1 5 days ago
@baudchaser that's why I planted the magical word "IF"...I know it's impossible as of now to add cylinders to a already running motor and I know Nissan did not put enough room in the block to accommodate 1300ccs more of displacement...having 100hp/liter does not mean the engine is "tapped out" lol..I got 70 more hp n/a from my already 100hp per liter motor and could still make more...dont insinuate I don't know what I'm talking about because I talk hypothetically, I know my shit..I built my car
CivicSIEm1 5 days ago
It better beat that mustang considering is newer and has more power, but alot of you forget that when u want to go fast for cheap an old pushrod 5.0 mustang will get you the best bang for buck, if ur really on a budget u can pull junkyard gt40 iron heads , stock cobra intake and a ford racing cam and that combo puts most 5.0s into the 260rwhp range without even tuning the computer, $200 for heads,199 for cam and 300 for intake, for around 700 bucks u got a high 12 or mid 13 second car.
cubano1389 1 week ago
@cubano1389 since when did 260rwhp get you into the high 12s?
fullmetaljacktt 1 week ago
@fullmetaljacktt Plenty of fox body mustangs have done it, and i said high 12s and thats probably with slicks and some weight reduction but 13s are normal for a fox mustang with that much power, u do know a fox mustang is lighter than a 350z.
cubano1389 1 week ago
@cubano1389 ah well you failed to mention the slicks and weight reduction you just said heads, intake and cam which would be amazing to get into the 12s with considering most stock fox stangs start in mid to low 14s
fullmetaljacktt 1 week ago
@fullmetaljacktt Well dont think that one without slicks wont get into the 12s , but even without removing weight and putting slicks a fox stang with those mods i mentioned will get into the 13s, and yes they start out around 14s when all u have is basic boltons. A lot of people think 5.0s suck becuase they produced poor power but they forget that these engines had horrible heads from the factory. If u can afford it u can get aluminium heads and the car will get into 12s easy.
cubano1389 6 days ago
@cubano1389 Yea but a set of heads like that is going to cost you twice what you were talking about not to mention the labor if you can't install it yourself. Plus my guess is the heads alone will only get you to mid 13's maybe.
fullmetaljacktt 6 days ago
@fullmetaljacktt Sometimes u can find used aluminum pieces for half the price, and installing heads on a 5.0 ford is easy compared to engines like the 4.6 . Kid you not but i have seen fox get into the 13s without changing the stock heads or cam, with bolt ons only . U have to be a really good driver and have a light car also. Also if u are good at porting u can port the gt40 iron heads and get some good flow out of them.
cubano1389 6 days ago
and if my mustang had a jet engine it would have better weight to HP ratio, get back on the point the 370 doesn't have a v8, the mustang is at least 10 years old, 5.0 back then were not pumping out HP like they are today. the 370 might have been in the lead, but in my mind lost the shit out of that race by a toddler with a backwards cap
realistix23 1 week ago
What a pussy don't know how to race you suck ass go play your video games that's bout all your good at kid
Mustang8950ful 1 week ago
i think its time to drop the hood....u lost to a tuner o_O
crazycolby68 1 week ago
@erday no shit a bigger motor with 2 more cylinders would be faster...if the vq37 was the same size as the 5.0 it would make more power and torque that's why I said that..I could give a shit if the new 5.0 is faster than a 370z I think they're gay..I'm faster than both of those cars and whatever you drive..you're just too slow to understand concepts like hp/liter and tq/liter
CivicSIEm1 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you hilly billie stick with your tractor's
nimmi2424 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you hilly billie stick with your tractor's
nimmi2424 1 week ago
you hilly billie stick with your tractor's
nimmi2424 1 week ago
you hillybillie stick with your tractor's
nimmi2424 1 week ago
he wasnt gettin all out of the pony either
WICKEDPONY81 1 week ago
@willizim exactly, thank you for proving my point..think about it, the 370z motor outperforms the new 5.0... 2 less cylinders and closer to 100hp per liter.. 3.7L-333hp 5.0L-420hp so scale the 3.7L up 1L keeping this ratio it would make at least 433hp as a 4.7L v6 if not more... Still 300ccs smaller than the 5.0 2 less cylinders and 13hp more..the vq35 is a better motor than the new 5.0, thank you for proving my point.
CivicSIEm1 1 week ago
@CivicSIEm1 Idk why would even think that, but it would get torn up by any new 5.0.
erdaylike24se7en 1 week ago
@CivicSIEm1 Except that you can't simply "keep" the ratio & up the number of cylinders. It doesn't work that way. Smaller displacement can always rev easier due to less reciprocating mass! American manufacturers (and everybody else who knows what they're talking about) know this. They KNOWINGLY sacrifice HP/L for low-end power. If they wanted HP/L, they could certainly do it. News flash - America is NOT taxed on engine size, thus, HP/L means jack shit. I drive an 07 350z...so...not biased.
baudchaser 1 week ago
another slow ugly mustang..5.0l and still love..pathetic..mustang drivers are pussies
krazzyyo2 2 weeks ago
@krazzyyo2 Nigga your the puss what car you drive? fag!
TheRickRod 1 week ago
@krazzyyo2 Steve McQueen would slap the shit outta you.
MrCleanPolo 1 week ago
put a new 5.0 against a new 350z and see what happens.
tracybuddha 2 weeks ago
@tracybuddha it would't be a race. on the bright side, the 350z could tell you how your taillights look.
Revenant2058 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
tracybuddha 2 weeks ago
you v8 guys kill me....that japanese v6 just waxed your (american muscle) hahaha
baptistchristian1992 2 weeks ago
@baptistchristian1992
lool a 20year old mustang with this setup = 8000-13000 $
a 2007 370z = + 30 000 $
pouliot 2 weeks ago
@pouliot So much fail in one post. 370z's were not out in 2007 and a used 350z for that year is much cheaper.
willizm 2 weeks ago
@baptistchristian1992 Weight diff... you put a fat guy against a skinny guy who's gunna win? No No make that an 40 year old fat guy vs a 20 year old skinny :) and on the topic iv raced ricers in my 88 and fucked them up so yup 6 races won and only raced 6 times do the math.
TDWPxLordXenu 2 weeks ago
@baptistchristian1992
Make that little v6 race a R1 then. Since that's all you seem to grasp. lmao
Revenant2058 2 weeks ago
Nice race.... might want to wear that seatbelt lol. USDM or JDM, gotta respect the 6 speed!!!
carbenfiber450sxR 2 weeks ago
racing without a seatbelt, real smart
Bongwater123 2 weeks ago
im a chevy fan but i will take any muscle over rice lmao
Brmobrad 2 weeks ago
@Brmobrad Amen, for christ sake 4cyl's just sound like dogshit at W.O.T.
DJSlurp1200 2 weeks ago
That kid in the mustang is like "Where the fuck is my NOS!"
Mario4Italy 3 weeks ago
Any motor has potential...I hate to say I but you could take a 60s vw bug or a Kia rio or just the shittiest car you can imagine and make it the fastest..ANY car has potential so of course 5Ls is potential, ford just got nowhere close to the potential which is why its a pointless start in my book... I like starting with 100+hp/liter not less than 50hp/liter lol....and I like being under 3000lbs...something about light cars, they just handle better lol
CivicSIEm1 3 weeks ago
@CivicSIEm1 The mustang is about power potential. It's for people who want to build the car into what they want with parts combos. It's not about Ford taking and putting in a tapped out motor that has very little potential left. You should know something about that driving a civic. Typically civics need motor swaps to be threats on the strip.
fullmetaljacktt 1 week ago
i agree theyre slow stock but anyone who says the ford five-oh doesnt have power potential has never even SEEN a dragstrip (from a chevy lover)
8BitBastard 3 weeks ago 3
If their hats were on forward, they would've had the Z.
shinypurplewalrus 3 weeks ago
Lemme correct myself before anyone does the 350zs were 284-305hp and 260tq...way more than that gay 5 litre...
CivicSIEm1 3 weeks ago
@CivicSIEm1 Your comparing old technology to new technology. How about comparing the new 5.0 to the new vq37hr if you really want apples to apples. Put them both against each other and see who wins. This is coming from a guy that had a g37 so, lol
willizm 2 weeks ago
@TheWeavert92 I'm no pro 350z homo, but you do realize that 3.5l v6 outperforms your 5.0l v8 stock for stock...the 5ls were overrated!! At 220bhp and matched, maybe more tq...350zs are around 260-270 bhp stock an more than 220tq lol...get the fuck outta here who would start with such a shitty foundation, that mustang was pointless let alone most.....
CivicSIEm1 3 weeks ago
@JWLSSS hahahahahahahahaha, but atleast it looks clean, I'll give him that....
fast80z28 3 weeks ago
get the e303 cam and 100mm throtle body gt40 upper and lower plenum and youll beat that z but still get destroyed by anything with a ls2 or lsx
biggunzcdb 3 weeks ago
@biggunzcdb you mean ls1? my trans am stock killed full bolton and cammed fox's
BlackBirdv6 3 weeks ago
@BlackBirdv6
And they both suck...
4g63tballs 2 weeks ago
@4g63tballs says the dsm fan
BlackBirdv6 2 weeks ago
@BlackBirdv6 You betcha
4g63tballs 2 weeks ago
@4g63tballs so ill go out and get a picture for you then. in that picture you will see 2 turbo hondas, a 2g gst and a 2g gsx, and 1 2000 trans am. the 2 hondas are getting body and motor work, the 2 dsm's are getting new motor and shep trannies, and the trans am is still on the original motor andstock tranny, and its still faster than all 4 of the other cars
BlackBirdv6 2 weeks ago
Sharp mustang, good looking on the outside now it needs a driver or to have some money spent on performance parts
logut80 3 weeks ago
@TheWeavert92 You obviously don't have a 9 second car or any idea how much money it takes. 5 grand LOL, fuck I wish that were true. Try 10-15 to do it with quality parts and labor. Unless your a master mechanic like 99% of YouTube. Of course what do I know, I'm only a hydraulic engineer and lift mechanic, cars are my hobby not profession. That said ive built a few cars on my own and know the time and planning/money it takes to be fast.
f34rthe4banger 3 weeks ago
That Mustang pulls a lot harder than the Z. It's probably more fun to drive too, just saying.
csauceda100 3 weeks ago
@csauceda100 its a blast! i broke my seat the other day lmao
heymynameistyler 3 weeks ago
Mustangs are for shit! Never win, always out of control and always in the Ford garage to get screwed by FoMoCo!
blackmetalurgist 3 weeks ago
The stang was shifting too late.
rollinwitbigc 3 weeks ago
those stangs are beast 15 year gap in technology and still keeping up BUILT FORD TOUGH
234soccerfreak 4 weeks ago 19
@234soccerfreak tttbird crazy
195744 1 week ago
@234soccerfreak ford is complete shit broski.
lighthead018 5 days ago
@lighthead018 your wrong. i own ford and chevy performance vehicals and the 5.0 stang is one of the tuffest vehicals i ever owned. i beat on mine everday and it never skipped a beat. and mine wasnt stock either.
BLACKLACDTS 4 days ago
@234soccerfreak Let's try the track, see if these built ford tough cars can handle twists and turns
faYte0607 2 days ago
@faYte0607
Want to go year for year? yeah they sure as fuck will haha. any cobra 93+ any GT 99+ and any V6 11+ will work a track
RaudiAudiT 2 days ago
@234soccerfreak Fucked On Race Day. all that work and the big bad fox can't beat a v6 nissan thats ford tough luck. and loosing is not keeping up.
phishintube 1 day ago
Import # bEaSt! !
MultiNey2010 1 month ago
for a 2007 350z you better beat an 20+yr old v8
frostlwc 1 month ago 22
watch?v=RrO-Phu3Hbw
Go Google some more information.
ChipotleObsessor 3 weeks ago
love this vid
...
jedi760 1 month ago
i dont like mustangs but i think frop a dig it coulda got the Z
j21hustlin 1 month ago
I'd like to know where people keep finding these 2 lane roads adjacent to cornfields.
9992103 1 month ago
@9992103 Probably Iowa or Nebraska, just guessing
andyb0x 4 weeks ago
racing in a cornfield..fucking idiots
streetstangify 1 month ago
350z are sexy you will get a lot more girls with one than that mustang
Madalynfurr1 1 month ago
@Madalynfurr1 you get more respect in a classic than a new car.. Dont get me wrong i fucking love 350z's there in my top 3 but i love my fox and iv had it for only 3 months and already gott'N well over 200 comments about how awsome it is and how great it looks for an 88 i cant even drive down the fucking street without getting stopped and asked questions about it but yes 350s are the shit as well :)
TDWPxLordXenu 2 weeks ago
i think the appropriate bad pun would be, you just got riced?
poisonblader 1 month ago
@tuugfo A V8 is still a V8, end of story? That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard... By that logic, you're saying that the 1914 Cadillac type 51 motor should beat this 350z. Yes, the Caddy engine was a 315ci V8, but it only produced 70 horsepower. The technological advancements weren't made at the time to create optimal power from the engine. Even the 5.0 in this video pales in comparison to the technology put into this 350z even though they really weren't produced that far apart.
Enormousbison 1 month ago
thats gotta be the slowest fox body ive ever seen and i own two its either a piece or realy needs tuned
racoondeerhunter 1 month ago
@08WhiteSi how about i compare cars 40 years apart??? ever go to the drag strip ever see a 70 chevelle, camaro, cuda or any muscle car run 11,10,9 hell even 8s in the quater? its all about money how can you not compare cars no matter how old they are?
QuickSSilver98 1 month ago
ate
Voodoo8648 1 month ago
@08WhiteSi I was not comparing cars ok I just simply said that the mustang got its ass kicked.
xbox360rocksful 1 month ago
Anyone who watches this video who owns a z probably dosen't get that they are racing a 2007 car against a 1990 car...
wbc564 1 month ago
@wbc564 a V8 is still a V8 end of story
tuugfo 1 month ago
Typical teenage fag with a 5.0. Does all the dress up- wheels, tires, paint, cowl hood, big tach etc- and doesn't mod the engine at all. So we have a sick, fast looking fox body that runs mid 14 1/4s. I'd beat this Mustang with my '92 convertible, stock looking car with nothing but Explorer upper/lower, pulleys and exhaust. I went 13.80s @ 100 mph on all season tires with the stock paper air filter, spare tire and jack in the trunk etc. '07+ 3.5 G and Z cars are only ~101 mph cars.
gtdrummerdude 1 month ago
@gtdrummerdude how do you know the cars are stock? Mr. pro Explorer motor high 13 second drag racer guy.
joeyvillan 1 month ago
@joeyvillan I have done enough racing to tell by the look and sound that these cars are not very fast, how's that? And actually my Explorer setups go low 13s on 205/60R15 junk ass tires, and 12.70 - 12.80 with tire. Last car went 105 mph on motor in 110 degree heat, 5500 ft DA and 118 mph on bottle. I was into that car about $2500 including the cost of the car. Current car went 13.20 @ 107 with a 75 shot when it was complete stock. Paid $2600 for that one and it's pretty nice.
gtdrummerdude 1 month ago
watch out. his hats backwards.
JuicedJetta 1 month ago
woooow!!!! fox body got bodied!!!! lmao!!!!
QUIETBOY267 1 month ago
Damn that mustang just got his ass kicked by a 350Z oh shit man. That has to be sad
xbox360rocksful 1 month ago
The mustang guy woulda been better off if he could shift a bit quicker. not that he didn't do damn good there. haha
shizloops2 1 month ago
OH mustang you so gorgeous even when you lose....
OMGDESTROYED 1 month ago
still that was close....5k mustang vs 15k+ nissan
wemeatu3 1 month ago
Comment removed
SuperCoding 1 month ago
Im a total muscle car guy, but I will gladly admit he got his ass kicked. I love tuners when there built RIGHT.
GoCartDean 1 month ago
isnt that the corn field from the field of dreams ???
MrDaylow 1 month ago
Mmmm! savor the taste of that rice, mustang!
TMPJR 1 month ago
Mustang got shit on hahaha... Big tires and a cowl hood too hahahahahaha
FastisFast 1 month ago
Nice job not wearing your seat belt mustang driver. Better hope you're ass is invincible because when that stang gets loose from your noob driving teenaged ass you're going to be in fucking trouble.
SBrandon562 1 month ago
Both great cars but the VQ35DE is no joke
trdlee1 1 month ago
@SuperCoding Oh really? I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that a stock 370 ran 12s LOL. Ok? It's 2012, not 2010. the 5.0 will smoke that ass. Put a Stillen supercharger on the 370 and it would just beat the 5.0, but put a Kenne Bell on the 5.0 and it will make that blown 370 its bitch.
MrKaiju22 1 month ago
Comment removed
SuperCoding 1 month ago
Bentley wilkinson- are you actually saying that aerodynamics have anything to do with a race at 55mph? That's retarded, that won't matter until about 100 at least. Even then not so much in this kind of race. The 5.0 had 225hp which is slow. Now with alum h/c/I+ full exhaust set up it'd be around 350hp and still be a 6-7k including the car. And good bye 25k 350z!
Turbo05gt 1 month ago
@Turbo05gt 55 mph?? They redlined 3rd and into 4th what the fuck do you know if you think top end of 3rd gear is 55mph?? That mustang is UGLY as fuck the Z looks 10x better. Mabey if you were'nt an idiot you would have the money for the Z!! And aerodynamics come into affect about 60 ish you dumb pos.
kamakaziRider88 1 month ago
5.0 is beast, except that hood =[
acmoc 1 month ago
fuck the 350z the stang is still a sweet ride
stanggod95 1 month ago
top speed??
dr689632 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that's an abuse racing a 20 year old stock car with a modern car , I bet If you race the new 5.0 or the even the new v6 I bet your 350 will get blown .
paraadrian11 1 month ago
HAHAHAHA redneck race!!! it's in the damn corn field! nice cars though..
Rboney88 2 months ago
damn. i need an hr z.
ThestalosFireMonarch 2 months ago
Time to take off the hood if you can't stay with a z(2 cents)
ChallengerGuy22 2 months ago 11
@ChallengerGuy22 psht wonder how many mods that 350 z had to have to beat that 5.0 i know the cost of building that jap crap costs more than a ford 5.0 the most common ford engine out there next to the 4.6 that anybody can build and make it a 9 second car for under 5k american dollars.
TheWeavert92 4 weeks ago
@TheWeavert92 guessing he has more mods than the 350 had 5.0s just aren't very fast stock compared to todays cars
ChallengerGuy22 4 weeks ago
@ChallengerGuy22 well cant argue with that statment but i have to say id rather roll in the muscle than the import.
TheWeavert92 3 weeks ago
@TheWeavert92 9 second car for under 5 grand lol you are a dumbass ... if the were true there would be 9 second stangs every where
Pharaohsmn 3 weeks ago
slicks and that HUGE hood... and still loses... lol...
marcomariaz26 3 months ago
@marcomariaz26 The Z is much newer what'd you expect? Hell there are plenty of old cars I can think of that a honda accord can beat, nothing to brag about.
need2speed94 2 months ago
@marcomariaz26 deceiving isn't it? lol...
DJSlurp1200 2 months ago
so does the fox have gears, heads, or an intake on it or is it complete stock?
MrPelonChazz 4 months ago in playlist More videos from acolddark0
@MrPelonChazz 100% stock motor 4.10s and bolt ons, intended on turbo but sold it and bought an 88 notchback
Turbo88Coupe1 3 months ago
Age matters to a certain extent a stock 5.0 has a little over 200 hp that's about the same as any new car has
bmister50 4 months ago
@bmister50 Yeah... considering the new coyote has over 400. And my Termi had 400 stock. New cars are faster unless you do some work under the hood.
SC04Cobra 2 months ago
@SC04Cobra i dont know if this is 100% true, but i remember reading somewhere that the 03 - 04 Cobras were actually underrated, and that they had 430 hp and 430 lb ft of torque.. again, i dont know if its 100% right, but i wouldnt doubt it either! those Cobras can run lol
DECAsk8r1000 1 month ago
@DECAsk8r1000 I forget what the actual number was... They were rated at 390 from the factory but yeah you are right. No actual rating is right on...
SC04Cobra 1 month ago
@DECAsk8r1000 ....They are under-rated and your numbers are the actual output give or take a few pony's and trq.
50RNDCLP 1 month ago
@DECAsk8r1000 your pretty accurate power wise
angrydog1979 1 month ago
I'm going to jump into the conv... Age does matter. For example, F1 cars of today perform faster with about 800 hp than they did two decades ago with 1000 hp.
xGUNxBUNNYx 4 months ago
This guy in the mustang looks like a tool
IS300driver26 4 months ago
The mustang stock is a 15.0 -14.80 second car that does not mph that good.....This car sounded pretty stock except for exhaust and probably a k&n so they are around the same...In the last race they raced from a dig and the 5.0 launched better than the Z and won.. In this race the 350z had mph on the 5.0 and won... soo the Z has better mph on the 5.0 and the 5.0 has better e.t. on the Z...either way it was a good race and both are nice looking cars ...
bmister50 4 months ago
thats a very nice fox body
bestlude 4 months ago 2
It's not about how old/new a car is or if it's "japcrap" or an "american lead-sled".
It's all about Power to Weight ratio and how to get that power into the ground, it's that simple. And when it comes to speeds over around 90km/h the aerodynamics will also be a big factor.
BentleyWilkinson 4 months ago
that wasnt really fair bc minus a full blown drag car with some well adjusted gears, above 120 or so you can smoke most 5.0's or any muscle car from that era. I'm not bashing. I owned a couple mustangs myself and currently drive a 08 NISMO Z, so in all fairness it was a good race. In turbo's defense though I will say he's right. I fuck around with my boy all the time and get pwned lol. but its still fun. lol
LowKeyYingYang 4 months ago
now thats a race
derwinmicheal 4 months ago
everyone who thinks the nissan is better is a stupid fuck. the mustang is 14 years older and still hung with it
imanor420 4 months ago
@imanor420 5.0 v8 vs a 3.5l v6. age means nothing.
Dallasmavs92 4 months ago
@Dallasmavs92 Age does matter actually, because technology evolves. 87-93 5.0 Mustangs came with 225hp from the factory, now look at the 2011 Mustang 5.0 pushing 412hp... If it was the 2011 5.0 vs. the 350z im sure there would be a different outcome.
TurboStanga 4 months ago 2
@Dallasmavs92 Your an idiot just for saying that... A 2011 MUSTANG 5.0 has double the HP and would smoke that 3.5L inthis video.... Those old V-8s didn't breath and they were stuffed with smog BS.
cantbsdave 4 months ago
@cantbsdave i agree with your statement. i can relate, i work on cars for a living...lol.
imacowtipper1 3 months ago
@Dallasmavs92 age means everything. L-O-L
ralatorre9 4 months ago
@steelstrings1312. Haha another internetRambo talkin shit...i bet u dont go up to random people on the street and say that
shoppy16 4 months ago
Who cares how old he is, I bet he rips gears better than half of you.
mazda6tuner99 5 months ago in playlist More videos from acolddark0 2
nice cowl hood lol
Storm7289 5 months ago
dude wtf, why is a 13 year old driving that gorgeous 5.0????
Fizano55 5 months ago 2
@Fizano55 thats what im sayin.
GetDickPunched 5 months ago
kids man.... seriously, go to a race track and stop wearing your hat backwards... it only makes you look 16 and stupid. and this is coming from another mustang driver...
steelstrings1312 5 months ago
@steelstrings1312 C'mon man.. they're racing next to corn field lol give them a break. and I wear my hat backwards all the time to pick up highschool chicks. This is coming from another mustang driver... J/K on the highschool part lol
sukwoo82 5 months ago
@steelstrings1312 Thats me buddy. Dont worry about my hat & i was 16, Id be more worried about going to the gym if i was you. You look like a goddam twig in your videos.
Turbo88Coupe1 5 months ago
@Turbo88Coupe1 lol nah. im just fine being a small guy. i dont have to be buff to feel good about myself. and damn im good with my projections.
steelstrings1312 5 months ago
Oh lawd, "dont do small upgrades until you spend more money than what you can spend, man you really need to understand the winsor motors before you start smacking off LOL. Ever heard of room to grow? a cam can produce waay more torque and hp with a ton of room to grow once he gets heads, it makes that cam much better. He's not "Required" to do heads and other shit to install a cam man. Yeah easy power, room to grow. He's not choking the heads, hes actually helping the car breath
stangredemption 5 months ago
lol pause at 0:20
chillinintheS5 6 months ago
no notice he does not have a seat belt on?....ummm....more dumb than i thought
ROBBY639 7 months ago
once you put some work into that 302, its gonna be fast. it makes alright torque outta the box but its shorted in the HP department. very light for a mustang and the motor has alot of potential.
need2speed94 9 months ago
@need2speed94 all you have to do is bolt-ons, underdrive pulleys and some gearing and that motor in the foxbody will be a workhorse
dbl0ck13 8 months ago
@dbl0ck13 i know, i plan on finding a 90-92 5.0, first mods will probably be mickey thompson ET streets, better gears(probly 4.10), and a nice cam probably the b303. maybe a 2 step rev limiter, maybe not.
need2speed94 8 months ago
@need2speed94 i got a 86 Mustang gt, hard top. ive dont intake, maf conversion, a9L computer=91 gt computer, shorty headers, hpipe not cats dont ever have to go thru emissions again THANK GOD, flowmaster american thunder exhaust, 255/60/15 mickey thompson et's in the rear with a .25 wheel spacer, summit fast five rims, march underdrive racing pulleys, ram stg1 clutch, all i have left to do is gears got 3.08's in there from factory i want 3.73's,
dbl0ck13 8 months ago
@dbl0ck13 nice man, yes gears are a must... in fact thats gonna be one of my first mods. i think thats something that people overlook
need2speed94 8 months ago
@need2speed94 trust me dont install a cam on a 5.0 untill you change cylinder heads or port the exhaust bumps on the stock head,in my opinion everyone should port those bumps its the easiest mod.that and a b cam you will have the fastest bang for the buck car.(and 3.73s and mt tires
MIGHTYSAMINYOURFACE 6 months ago
5.0 liter of slowliness...
weed46 10 months ago
dumb asses no seatbelts
schp007 10 months ago
mustang short shifted. obvious.
GuitarFreak881 10 months ago
damn son, can you say good ole american v8 torque ha
bmx500 1 year ago
@bmx500 thats why he lost -__- stupid ass
xExRxIxCxKx 1 year ago
@xExRxIxCxKx bullshit, the z just had more hp in the top end. but btw torque plays a bigger factor at a drag strip than horsepower. im not sayin horsepower isnt cuz the z won because of hp but from a dig aka lining up at the strip. it takes torque to come outta the hole before anyone else
bmx500 1 year ago
@bmx500 wow you're like a racing wiz! I never would've known that if it wasn't for you. thank you so much
xExRxIxCxKx 1 year ago
@xExRxIxCxKx what do you mean, i learned that from you dont you remember
bmx500 1 year ago
Comment removed
xExRxIxCxKx 1 year ago