CG Jung 1/3

[dozemix]

I wanted this video to be in German language.

[setnorm]

good lord who remembers the moment they became conscious of theirself?

[07Aristotle]

@setnorm You apparently don't.

[Parahelia]

Marie-Louise Von Franz, as did Jung, recognized dreams as being authentic experiences of that inner world that we must understand if our spiritual development is either not to occur, or depend upon the secondhand views of others. Both therefore, and in fact, encouraged those who were able always to interpret their own dreams. Darrell could hardly be more wrong if he tried (not a challenge!).

[amatorynumber]

OMG the BBC accent!!! jeez

[jackhillty]

hi darrell! get a life.

[Darrell861]

@jackhillty You are endorsing a man who was a licensed doctor who not only claimed to have the ability to interpret other people's dreams, but also based diagnoses on his own dream interpretations. That is unethical. Congrats, buddy. You are a circle jerker. You not only jerk off on Jung, but you are playing the monkey-see monkey-do game. You worship a man you don't know jack squat about.

[Darrell861]

@jackhillty Get a life. Yah. Sure. Very cogent and witty on your part.

[muntajabthegreat]

the video is manipulated. The part of the teacher who accused him of stealing the paper belongs to later part of the interview where he was talking about his medical studies.

However, thanks for the high quality

[jjvanka]

At least not by me. Interviews are edited quite often in order to establish a 'red line' for the (usually one-time) viewer.

[IExposeMormonism]

At minute 8:00, the entire time he expresses his displeasure he continually smacks the wood

[68ootani]

話しかつ動くユングを見れるなんて、何という素晴らしい事だ！ユ­ングの声を聞けるとは想像も出来なかった。素晴らしい！

[joet88]

the video and sound quality is great

[redcommander27]

Are his grandchildren afraid of him?

WTF? What kind of question is that. I know a decent amount about Jung and although he is undobutably unconventional he certainly apperars to be the opposite of frightening or intimidiating.

[Darrell861]

@redcommander27 On p.134-36 of Memories, Dreams, Reflections Jung intimidates a happily married doctor. The man is so bullied and frightened that he has a nightmare about Jung. Jung's handling of the situation contains 4 ethical violations: 1. Placing himself between an applicant and a licensing board. 2. Claiming to have the ability to interpret the dreams of others. 3. Basing a diagnosis of an immenent fatal condition on dream interpretation. 4. Not informing the doctor of the condition.

[jackhillty]

I don't need to believe. I know.

[Darrell861]

@jackhillty Monkey see, monkey do. Your quote from Jung has to be the most megalomaniac-driven thing he ever said. His quote is a slap in the face to anyone in the world who has religious beliefs. Jung also explained the existence of evil in the presence of a just and loving God: God was projecting his shadow upon humanity. Jung claimed to be superior to God because he, Jung could psychonalyse God. --Deirdre Bair, "Jung," Back Bay Books, 2003,

[Darrell861]

@Darrell861 Oops. Forgot one thing. Page 546 od Bair's book.

[nickbowdler]

Blessings

[klgamit]

Can someone please tell me what is the classical piece that is being played at the introduction ? thanks!

[jjvanka]

What I found:

1 - Title: Face to face; theme of the BBC series 'Face to? Face'. m Hector Berlioz, arr. Roy Green. Variant title: Face to face .Based on the overture, The Holy vehm.

2 - Face to Face , 'The Holy Vehm' by Hector Bolitho BBC series theme 'Face to Face' introduced by John Freeman 1960.

3 - From The Overture Les Francs-Juges, Berlioz.

Not sure what is correct.

[jns1955]

The music is by Berlioz and it is part of the Overture to Les Francs Juges. It was used as the theme tune to the Face to Face series of interviews by John Freeman, and later in the 1990s again, when Face to Face returned to BBC2 in the UK with Jeremy Isaacs as the inquisitor.

[klgamit]

Thanks, both :)

[circuitjack]

@klgamit It's definitely from the overture to Berlioz' Les Francs-juges (the third of jjvanka's options below). :)

[RedSidhe]

Thank you for uploading this! I admire Jung´s psychology...thank you very much.

[sugarpuddin88]

Jung read other mythologies & simply noted some commonalities

Dream therapy is hardly novel!

Jung's childhood sounds nearly identical to my own!

[serpentineflame]

well thank god you're so modest

[sugarpuddin88]

LOL

I realize from your comment that my comment really comes off poorly

Jung's childhood trouble at school sound very much like my own experience, (is more of what I was trying to say)

[PrickStanda]

Thank you for uploading this. Jung was and still is a fascinating personality. Sometimes, I feel sorry for being born to late to meet such people. But there's also a consolation - their work is still here... And fortunately, people of his kind don't leave world without a trace.

[cardensdriving]

Does the fish have chips?

[potentialrandom]

admitting ignorance in quite a noble fashion. In other words, these metaphysical ideas regarding God, ultimate reality, and such, are recognized as psychological truths whose epistomological status is unknown if not unknowable.

[eye8one2]

Materialism & rhetoric is for idol wrshipers & idol peddlers. Spirit is vibration not generation like fools who see life as revving-you. Fools believe nil above nor below thats unseent has true wisdom above rats/mice who pose as men, rattle bones/chains. Ego parades opinion, snakes/tricksters bait weak, hold wax apple, claim fiat as grand as real. For the illusions they've woven into fabric of time, soon unravels & disclose all truth & down to hell they'll hide.

[eye8one2]

note: Debates 4 fools who want piece never peace..Your effort to bring me to debate shows a point of your living as it seems as if it is to poke people on line, so eye Poke U back, but w/question, R U bot or bought, as, I don't know who profits from your Fhurts to poke me into debate? Do you do that for your ego or spiritless-ness? For mine? For a company? Or reason? Poking is not polite while beings w/manners are polite but Bots/boughts do what they do cause they got de-souled or sold.

[potentialrandom]

You wouldn't believe me if I told you.

I wish you well.

[eye8one2]

like/y-eyes2 U

[MelodxKay]

Thanks to Polarbong for sharing this interesting interview with me, and thanks to you for posting it.

[Polarbong]

Thank you for uploading this interview.

[eye8one2]

The most purest gold within this interview is found from 5:10 to 5:28. This is 18 secs of pure gold, in seed form, thought/spirit, within the universe and he shares it with all freely, take from it, it is free from the mind of a wonderful and wonder-filled spirit, understand his mind/garden, plant it within yours, let it grow, you will be rich beyond your wildest dreams. T/Y for this series and the gold, I will share it with others as well as should all of spirit.

[1nessism]

~:-]

[potentialrandom]

I remember coming across something, maybe a lecture or a book, in which it was stated that Jung later retracted this statement, saying that the question caught him off guard and that his answer was misleading. This clip is quite famous though, and I believe the popular appeal is due to the fact that it is essentially religious with a scientific veneer. As Jung himself has said regarding what we might call the New Age, "These attempts at concealment merely show that religion has grown suspect."

[eye8one2]

Religion is the debasing of spirituality. As a child he punished himself for thinking bad about religion/church. One day he allowed his thought to grow, he show God shit on the church. Jung was not religious, he was spiritual, in his end, he left the pretenders behind, those who pretend & are fictional characters playing for pompous baboons who are ignorance in flesh. You know them, those who commercial-lies, debase all that is good promoting fiat things, championing fake/lies over real/truth.

[potentialrandom]

It's been awhile since I've read anything of Jung's (including Memories, Dreams ..) and I don't want to misrepresent him, so I'll refrain from speaking for him. But I do recall him insisting that above all he was a scientist, an empiricist, and few would doubt his unpretentious individuality. I've got a problem with the word "spiritual" though, and find that it's often used to smuggle in metaphysical suppositions. Jung was well aware of this too, and kept his assumptions to a minimum, admitting

[eye8one2]

he sure did, his life was a book he wrote, most read his life/book wrong yet praise works of those who wrote for fiat crumbs. Debate's bait from snakes/tricksters. All that's true to one within , should please in truth to hold, greater then renting others assumptions to boost as ones own. experience brings truth. Sharing opinions offers one chance to say t/y but no t/y, while some force feed others who are not hungry for whats not 2B 8 so BS/shit is pushed to their face. peace, Jung = Taoist

[Darrell861]

@potentialrandom Jung was a scientist? Huh? He stated in Man And His Symbols that he realized what he was doing was not science. Well, what he was doing was interpreting other people's dreams. Ergo, dream interpretation is not a science. The only thing less scientific than dream interpretation is PLAYING THE KAZOO.

[Darrell861]

@potentialrandom You and I agree on one thing. Jung never had access to another's mind. Yet he claimed throughout his career that in fact he did. He called it "Dream Interpretation." His claim was flagrantly unethical to the point of breaking the Hippocratic Oath. Twice he diagnosed people as being near death and did not inform either person of his diagnosis which was based solely on dream interpretation. Where we draw the line of science is not guesswork. It stops at dream interpretation.

[potentialrandom]

@Darrell861 Youtube is giving me trouble posting comments; I tried to preface my previous one with this, and it's even more relevant now:

The comment of mine you responded to was written well over a year ago, and in it I stated that "it's been awhile since I've read anything of Jung's." I've really read nothing of his since, and I don't wish to be Jung's defender. You, however, seem to have a personal vendetta against him, and I leave its resolution up to you.

[Darrell861]

@potentialrandom I question your choice of a word. vendetta: a prolonged bitter quarrel with or campaign against someone. Rather than "bitter," I would prefer "sarcastic." Sarcasm is a literary style used at times by the likes of Saul Bellow and Mark Twain. It is also used by John Stewart and Stephen Colbert. My disgust with Jung's writings is exceeded only by my efforts to stop laughing. He and his followers find so many creative ways of putting their feet in their mouths.

[Darrell861]

@potentialrandom Prostitution is the oldest profession in the world. Dream interpretation is the oldest hoax in the world. There will always be people gullible and vulnerable enough to believe that someone else has the ability to interpret their dreams. If your next door neighbor Marge invites you over for coffee and dream interpretation, fine. But dream interpretation has no place in a licensed profession. Yet there are today who knows how many licensed Jungian psychotherapists.

[Darrell861]

@potentialrandom Jung and his followers have said that dream interpretatiion is always a dialectical process between two people. Marie-louise von Franz has said that it is not a good idea to interpret one's own dreams. It's best left to a skilled professsional. Daryl Sharp: "If you think you've understood the meaning of a dream upon waking, chances are you're mistaken." Hall: Jungians are particularly strong at dream interpretation. Snobbery. elitism and pretention right and left.

[Darrell861]

@potentialrandom Oops. Jung's quote about science came from Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 185. My mistake.