Added: 1 year ago
From: Intraphyx
Views: 86,314
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (174)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why would you call this a dubstep remix when the original was already dubstep ? Radiohead basically invented dubstep with Idioteque, 10 years before anyone even knew dubstep existed.

  • Dubstep is shit

  • the only reason this is good is because you've barely changed it

  • The original is definitely better, but this remix leaves me in awe. I think it really allows me to go back and appreciate the original more, because it brings out the pieces you may have not heard before. I like how it allows me to view it differently.

  • omg one of my fav songs && this version gives me chills

  • u idiots, it doesnt have to be BETTER than the original, its not trying to be, its just trying to be different, appreciate the different tune or fuck off

  • this does not justify the original

  • I wonder if this would get more likes if it didn't have "dubstep" in the title.

    Maybe a few less views too.

  • @theastralproject Most likely it would have a lot less in both departements.

  • @ExadusX There are many people heavily biased both toward and against dubstep. I just think of it as another electronic genre, no big deal...

  • I just wonder why people have to compare original and remix.

    I do love Radiohead and I enjoy this, too. If you don't like why you are here?

  • despite my love for electronic music, idioteque royally kicks electros ass.

  • this gay, you might as well go fuck a guy

  • So much potential. But it's just Idioteque in 70 with a bassline. Give it to Burial...

  • Good remix, even better picture damn that's sexy!!!!! And trippy as fuck!

  • Fuck this shit original is better

  • this is actually one of my favorite radiohead remixes

  • hmmm its okay its not THAT!! bad!,,

  • i came ready to hate this, but was surprised.  not too bad.

  • This wasn't as bad as I thought it would be when I accidentally clicked on it.

    It would never fit on Kid A, but it also doesn't fit in that category of "Cheap Dubstep Remixes" that you find on youtube everywhere.

    Good job.

  • yeah.... fuck this.

    

  • @maxmalfunction mad?

  • I am a huge fan of this song, and I always thought the beat could use a little more strength. I'm not saying I like this version more, but I am saying this is a better remix than most people are it credit for. I think it can be a little to much precussion, and in some places it drowns his voice a little. it should also take it's time and go up and down, make some solid drops, instead of being so constant. Other than that, I think it's pretty good.

  • It really isn't bad. I am neither a "fanboy" of either, I listen to everything. And this really isn't bad! If you don't like this then I think it's just because you think you need to protect your bands song from being remixed. Predjudiced and close-minded much?

  • this sucks just sayin haha they ruined this beautiful song

  • All they really did was add more percussion to the already perfect percussion. If anything it threw off the rhythm.

  • No, the fuck no.

  • lol what a lame remix haha

  • Man, how does this have that many dislikes? I love this remix.. Damn those hipsters.

  • Wow, I though this would be crap....GREAT JOB MAN! :D

  • I need a download link for this!

  • I feel like most remixes just ruin songs, so I hate remixes in general. But whoever made this really pulled it off. It's not better than the original, but it sounds pretty great. This isn't just thoughtless sound.

  • ALMOST good

  • I love dubstep but I love radiohead even more. It's called being open to multiple genres. This is a beautiful mix of idioteque. Most of you are right, it's not better than the original but what remixes are? hardly any, the point is i can still enjoy this so you should too.

  • @shawry41 well said

  • @shawry41 To answer your question, the remix for Bush's "Mouth" was a lot better than the album version, and some may agree with me that the Latch Brothers remix of At the Drive-In's "Rascuache" was superior to the Vaya cut. Maybe not. But I'm with you on this. Radiohead is my all time favorite of all time, and even though this remix doesn't really add anything new or necessary, it's not garbage at all.

  • fuckin dubstep...

  • really not different enough from the original to be called a "remix"

  • @jmarr100

    Your comment was so awesome that I don't care about your bad grammar.

  • To those who oppose this remix: I'm going to assume your objection to this stems from the fact that you don't like dubstep, because independent of the original song, this is a pretty good dubstep. If you don't like dubstep, you are not the target audience of this song. Stop calling it things like "shit" and "bastardization". Those should be reserved for objectively bad songs. This is not an objectively bad song, it's just doesn't intersect with your tastes.

  • @jmarr100 wow no you're an idiot. this is fucking ruined.

  • @xoxokarla1ilyxoxo I think someone with a name as ridiculously stupid as yours should probably think twice before calling someone else an idiot.

  • @jmarr100 alright i'll stop just dont minecraft me to death. faggot

  • @xoxokarla1ilyxoxo What does any of this have to do with Minecraft? Also, there's no call to be using slurs. It's unoriginal, offensive, and it only makes you look bad.

  • @jmarr100 Well no, this isn't "a good dubstep" this is a shitty remake of what was a good song. I don't know if you're aware but not everything is dubstep.

  • @xoxokarla1ilyxoxo It's a dubstep remix! The word dubstep is literally in the title!

  • @jmarr100 It's fucking shitty and needs to be stopped

  • @xoxokarla1ilyxoxo Just fucking relax! It's not that popular, so it's not as if it's being shoved in your face every second of the day. You can easily ignore it and just move on with your damn life. If you hate it so much, why don't you just go and listen to something you actually like?

  • @jmarr100 You seem to be getting pretty fucking worked up over a shitty remix of a radiohead song.

  • @xoxokarla1ilyxoxo You're the one who said it "Needs to be stopped" like you're the chief of the bloody Westboro Baptist Church or something. And you didn't answer my question: if you hate this song so much, why don't you just listen to something else instead of complaining?

  • @jmarr100 omfg fuck OFF you're annoying as FUCK. it's a shitty remix and everyone fucking hates it just geeeeeet over it. fucking end yourself faggot

  • @xoxokarla1ilyxoxo Your argument is as convincing as it is articulate. Nevertheless, I think you'll take your advice and leave now. You may not have anything better to do than argue, but I do and I'm sick of being distracted from them by this ridiculous "debate". Goodbye.

  • @jmarr100 alright just dont gay me to death

  • @xoxokarla1ilyxoxo hahaha trolling?

  • I think this is brilliant. Y'all haters can waste time not enjoying yourselves, man.

  • get over this "it has to be the origional" crap, people. even radiohead did covers. i actually like this version, it's a bit different.

  • @xxdarkangel15xx But this isn't a cover. It's a bastardization.

  • Is this really happening?! :(

    You,Sir Intraphyx are a fucked up person.

  • THIS PLACE IS CURSED!!

  • hell yeah! lets shit on radiohead with some more brostep! all praise SKRILLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEXXXXXXXX.

    ha.

  • doesn't work at all

  • Disregard.

  • Not bad, considering you just took the original mixdown and cut it up.

  • You love the paki techno? Yes? Subscribe bitches! paki.

  • @DarkPartyBoy darkie..lol

  • Where do you find the picture on this video?

  • considering ive heard the original song a million times, i like this for a change its pretty sick. that snare sounds shitty tho sorry

  • THIS SUX !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • so totally fucked the originals sweet asshole and filled it up with your man mustard.

  • i have this weird craving for taffy and pussy

  • very nice, very nice. hey, has anyone herd a version of this song with little sound bites of a game or maby a cartoon in it? herd it once many years ago but i cant find it now... plz, anyone, can you plz help me!!

  • Not better than the original- few songs could be- but great :D

  • This is shit, never ever could be better than the real version

  • Thumbs up if you clicked this for the babe in nylon.

  • pros: not overdone or shit on

    cons: no fat drop

  • @yougotcrad1 This is real dubstep and who says "fat drop"? Are you DJ Jazzy Jeff?

  • @yougotcrad1 agree..

  • shame about the quality, this is sick

  • This is the biggest fucking disgrace to radiohead ever imaginable. Dubstep (or shall i say "shitstep") is the most terrible fucking excuse for music and then to take the most shitty kind of music ever and put it over a slowed down version of one the greatest songs by the greastest band is just fucking terrible. Not only is the genre of music shitty but the actual song is extremely shitty even for its joke of a genre. Whoever made this is a terrible person who should jump off the highest buildin

  • @DannyGomez666 you mad?

  • @DannyGomez666 you are lame. Radiohead is my 2nd favorite band in the world next to the progressive rock band Porcupine Tree, and yet I like dubstep as well. And I must say, this is a very well done remix

  • @DannyGomez666 haha you faggot dubstep is the best u dont even know

  • @DannyGomez666

    u mad bro?

  • @DannyGomez666 honestly: i hate it, if people are taking songs and make it into a techno song. but i think dubstep ist something different... its making the song more psychedelic

  • I came teh boobies, and stayed for the Bass.

    And also boobies.

  • can i download this somewherre?

  • Not only is brostep fucking awful, but my personal opinions about the genre aside... this is an extremely poor remix.

  • i love radiohead and dubstep this song is ill to begin with and it was not changed very much in this remix but i still love it

  • i like radiohead & i like a lot of dubstep. stop hating on either or. it's not the fault of one or the other, just not a good combo. (minimal work put in + shit sound quality IMO) then again, if the sound quality was pristine, maybe minimal wouldn't sound so bad.

  • @breakbomb1 THOM LOVES DUBSTEP. not skrillex, but others.

  • @SuperiFox hell yeah. any real musician out there would never discard a genre as a whole

  • @SuperiFox Not the kind of dubstep that's close to this though, more like Mala and early skream work.

  • @SuperiFox thats exacly how i feel skrillex sucks but like flux and others are ahmazing

  • what the fuck did they do

  • Cheers for ruining a perfect song, cunt. 

  • @Nopewasalreadytaken holy shit. nothings fucking ruined, it's not like whenever someone plays the original this will play instead? fuck you.

  • @CardboardTurtle

    The world doesn't need more awful dubstep remixes, mate. Dubstep's reputation is pretty bad as it is, this just makes it worse.

  • @Nopewasalreadytaken You should learn to be less pretentious and douchey. Let people enjoy their thing.

  • @SuperiFox Nah mate

    people that enjoy this have no taste.

  • @Nopewasalreadytaken because this is the song everyone will listen to first when they want to get into dubstep, right? it's not even that bad, you can't just base your opinion on what other people are going to think, sure some people will dislike it but a lot of other will like it or think "it's alright". i'm sure you'd eat something like this up if it was made by skrillex or some shit.

  • @CardboardTurtle Your argument was pretty decent until the last part.

    Skrillex isn't even dubstep. He's just a cunt.

    But fair enough.

  • @Nopewasalreadytaken i was implying that you liked him and that made you gay because he's gay.

  • @CardboardTurtle

    But I don't, so you fucked up there kiddo.

  • Ha funny I was just going to say I hate dubstep but love Radiohead before reading your comment. Maybe someone's already said it.

  • boy oh boy i love dubstep but i HATE radiohead! LOLZ

  • thats really really really reaaaaaaaaaally bad!! fuck you !!!!

  • EeEwww gonna kill myself now.

  • the worse radiohead remix ever... this guy ruined idiotheque... no more magic in the song, just weird sounds wrongly used, it's just a mess...

  • not dupstep fail

    but good

  • great but... sounds fucked!

  • I love orginal but this is just as awsome and its sounds like this could be a song on the radio

  • This is good but I prefer the original :(

  • I feel like the sound quality is kinda crappy, but not a bad effort.

    P.S. Dubstep is NOT defined by wobbles, to everyone who keeps saying that...it truly is defined by the bass/snare pattern and the high hat riffs in the background. Yes, dubstep as we have come to expect it is full of wobbles...but wobbles don't HAVE to be present for it to be dubstep.

  • this isn't dubstep. adding a bass tone and a kick snare pattern to a song doesn't make it a dubstep remix. goddamn fucking children.

  • @joeweemsbiitch You're an ignorant prick.

  • @joeweemsbiitch What? Do you want him to fill the thing with synths, drops and wobbles? No, dubstep is mainly defined by this particular drum pattern, and low level bass. This new genre of dubstep (brostep, which i enjoy just as much as the old stuff) is what you're looking for. Educate yourself before you go around saying what's dubstep and what's not.

  • this is so stupid. what idiot makes a dubstep remix of a radiohead tune? this asshole needs to have his head examined.

  • DAT BASS!!!!

  • 2+2=5 New Laws Remix

    youtube.com/watch?v=z4lAMd3qPI­A

  • Ugh when will people learn you can't remix this song. The only remix that works is the BBC remix which is basically Radiohead changing up the song a little bit.

  • It's not *entirely* what we define as dubstep in the ever-changing current times, but the subbass really pulls the whole track through. Some breaks wouldn't have done harm though. :)

  • you've fucked the original

  • Yeah this is awful

  • i expected this, this song kinda insists upon itself to have a dubstep remix

  • This sucks it takes away from the original.

  • i like the subtle drops on this one

  • I don't understand it. It's catchy and all, but it doesn't add to the original, so what's the point?

  • you kinda raped the original one.

  • Kept everything good about the song and added dubstep. Bravo!

  • I think my soul just curled up and died.

  • thanks for not changing it up too much

  • i'm not really understanding this. they added a beat behind it and inserted a bassline that follows the chords' roots. what exactly is so amazing about this version other than what Radiohead had already done?

  • @Kon61892 I agree. It's a nice mix (some people say "bassline" when they mean "break" but whatevs), but doesn't really add to anything in my opinion either.

  • @mehedmb PS --- For an example of a mix that DOES add a major nice touch, check out the Zero 7 mix of "Climbing up the Walls"...

  • @mehedmb Yes, I would say that's a lot better. Thanks for the good pointer!

  • That is not dubstep! Where is the bass drops and wobbles?! You've only added a dance beat behind with some added drums. THIS IS A JOKE RIGHT?! You haven't changed a thing!

  • @MylesCalebRyder Listen to some earlier dubstep like Burial, and you'll notice that it has no "Wobbles" lol, that's just the really commercial and honestly repeatitive dubstep you're thinking of. Primarily what makes this dubstep is the characteristics of the beat.

  • @justinorville It's not just the wobbles and the bass drops I know my dubstep. James Blake is dubstep and he doesn't do wobbles or bass drops, he did bring back some old flavour and mixed it with his own unique sound. I'm just saying if he is doing a remix of dubstep then at least do something different instead of keeping the song the same it hasn't been changed really at all in my opinion, and yeah it just sucks dubstep is so mainstream and honestly a wobble would have made this remix better.

  • @MylesCalebRyder A wobble may have made it better ha, honestly I just listen to the original of this song, such a brilliant tune and kid a is an amazing album. But yes I can see you know your dubstep ha :P.

  • @justinorville Agreed I don't think it should have been touched personally, hence the aggression. :)

  • This song is surely on god's Ipod.

  • This tracks jsut works perfectly as a dub remix, and some of their new tracks are just crying out for the dubstep treatment. Think, Supercollider/The Butcher!

  • Oh My god... this is better than takig it in the ass

  • GREAT! but the quality is crap.. can you repost with higher quality?

  • This song was made for Dubstep already.

  • before this song I was drinking tea........now i'm drinking vodka

  • it should have been the original that thom yorke wrote

  • Y'know what this isn't even dubstep lmfao.

  • @Azzzax3

    It's cut time 2/4 beats with a heavy sub bass. The mid-range wub wub brostep shit is a pretty recent development.

    I don't blame you for not knowing that, though. Listen to some Burial or Kryptic Minds.

  • im still waiting for the wobble

  • @polarbeargrylls Pssssh!! Stereo types.

  • before this song i was drinking chocolate milk...............now im drinking hot chocolate.

  • Booo.. it sounds like the same song but with something playing over it.

  • anywhere at all to download this???

  • Omg why i havent found something like this before amazing ♥__♥

  • FINALLY!!! an amzing dubstep remix of ideoteque, good job!!

  • @DropDeadProjekt and the one who posted this.  this is a decent song but def not dubstep. just sounds over top a good song

  • @figure4614 yea ur right it isnt, coulda sworn there was a wobble the first time i heard it. guess not. still good remix

  • @figure4614 This is most definitely dubstep. You just don't know what actually makes a dubstep song. You must think it's all about mid-range wobbles.

  • this is pretty fly

  • Eargasm

  • Ah, alright! Thanks grandeur, ill put it in the description.

  • Akira Kiteshi apparently put this remix together. Mrdubmassive originally posted

    the video on youtube, but it was taken down for whatever reason.

    A decent 320 copy of the song has yet to surface. Anyway, thanks for posting it again Intraphyx.

  • On YouTube itself

  • You might not know who made it...

    -But what's your source?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 0