I HATE linear graphing. IT MAKE NO SENT! I can do equations if I am shown how. But I don't see how the numbers and variables can really make sense when calculating the gradients and stuff. This stuff's craziness!
how do you work a problem like this when you have large numbers that aren't included on the graph itself, like if you have a graph where both the x axis and the y axis only go to 10, how do you work it with say, 2x + y = 3 and 7x + 5y = 21, how would you work that? Please answer, thanks in advance.
You could've explained where (2.4) came from. I finally figured it out after pondering it for a while. Where as you could've explained that very quickly and have saved me the frustration.
Dude I'm like freakin inlove with you !!! Thank you SOOO much !! But I have one question : if it's so simple to solve the equation , then why were you guessing in the behind of the vid ?
@LuckyGirl931 okay your on the right track no worries! lol since you have 4(-2)+4=-4........all you do is solve 4(-2)which= -8 so -8+4=-4 :) there was nuthin to it lol
I hate bad college textbooks that don't explain anything but cost an arm. I love great YouTube videos that explain everything in clear terms and cost nothing. <3
Thanks Patrick! This is probably the 4th video I have watched by you and all of them have helped very much. Keep up the good work, I'll keep watching!
Can you post a vid on how to solve systems of linear differential equations using jordan normal form? More specifically though would be when the matrix isn't easily put into jordan normal form (as in you cant easily find M for A=MJM^-1)
@patrickJMT ofcourse you could solve a system of 3 equations in a 3D space but that would be a waste of time. How do you solve 3+ equations using this method ?
For linear equations Gauss method is the best imo.
Even though I'm done with my Algebra, I like checking out your videos as a sort of refresher. Not to mention the fact they helped me through the course by making sense of the class/book explanations.
Remember that matrices can do a lot more than just hold some linear equations. The particular algorithm for solving these systems with matrices is called Gaussian Elimination.
He put "y on both sides" so he could get y on the other side of the equation to isolate it. He added y to both sides so the y on the left would cancel out to 0 and there would be a +y on the right. He most likely moved the y instead of the 5x so he could keep y positive and not have to multiply the entire equation by -1 to get +y = 5x-6 at the end.
well, a line with positive slope (that is , the line with equation y = 5x - 6) has a slope of 5. a line with positive slope goes up and you move left to right
@pitchwest yeah, always just think that for slope, it's "Rise / Run" or "Rise over run" or "y / x"... maybe they should be delta y and delta x for that last pneumonic. So rise refers to the y-axis and run refers to the x axis.
what if you 3x-y=2 and 1/3y=-2+3x
needsmetal 20 hours ago
That was somewhat helpful.
xF3ARL3SSx43VR 3 days ago
@xF3ARL3SSx43VR just like your comment!
patrickJMT 3 days ago
if only you sat next to me during my algebra end of course...
xxhailybabexx 1 week ago
U saved my life
MrAlan1206 1 week ago
Thanks dude! I'm pretty sure you hear this a bunch of times but my teacher sucks balls and you are awesome
IFightPriests 2 weeks ago
this is so help ful thank u very much
fawkyeww11 2 weeks ago
I HATE linear graphing. IT MAKE NO SENT! I can do equations if I am shown how. But I don't see how the numbers and variables can really make sense when calculating the gradients and stuff. This stuff's craziness!
aussienerds 2 weeks ago
internet stranger > textbook
AtomicConnor 3 weeks ago
THANK YOU OMG
yesterdaywasADTR 3 weeks ago
@patrickJMT Do I use this same method if there is a number in front of Y?
Chicago4551 3 weeks ago
@Chicago4551 sure
patrickJMT 3 weeks ago
i thought you used rise over run for stuff like this!
am i wrong? :(
littlemissrandome1 3 weeks ago
@littlemissrandome1 that also works.
patrickJMT 3 weeks ago
Thank you so much! I've been going crazy all day trying to figure this out and now I finally understood it! :)
Preciouz913 4 weeks ago
<3
KoreyMotherEfinDavis 1 month ago
THNX A BUNCH!!!! mist a day of math and this got me all caught up! :D
ImpGaming1 1 month ago
how do you work a problem like this when you have large numbers that aren't included on the graph itself, like if you have a graph where both the x axis and the y axis only go to 10, how do you work it with say, 2x + y = 3 and 7x + 5y = 21, how would you work that? Please answer, thanks in advance.
superchaser3 1 month ago
i love you vids man
DrunkSquirrlz 1 month ago
what would you do if the y had a number next to it ?
mskennedynicole 2 months ago
@mskennedynicole When you are putting the equation into (mx+b) format, you divide by the number in front of "Y" to get it alone on the "Y" side.
SuperBafiaBoy 2 months ago
Great Video! Thank you so much! Please keep posting!! :D
52494Princess 4 months ago
You could've explained where (2.4) came from. I finally figured it out after pondering it for a while. Where as you could've explained that very quickly and have saved me the frustration.
dankymcdunker 4 months ago
@dankymcdunker It is where the two lines intersect/cross. he said it like 3 times.
SuperBafiaBoy 2 months ago
Dude I'm like freakin inlove with you !!! Thank you SOOO much !! But I have one question : if it's so simple to solve the equation , then why were you guessing in the behind of the vid ?
VanillaBlondie15 5 months ago
Thank you so much! My algebra book only showed it graphed and didn't explain how to do it! I understand how to do it because of you :) thanks alot!
LovecanbeEvol 5 months ago
what do i do when i have 2y
menick595 5 months ago
@menick595 2y is not an equation, so i am not sure what you do with it
patrickJMT 5 months ago 3
Thanks! You make graphing so much easier, the book examples make no sense at all.
90jaredk 7 months ago
how did u get (2,4) ? :P
RobellionXD 7 months ago
This is so helpful dude!!!!!!
I had to present a project and i used this as my main math problem
it is really helpful
this is the only video that actually tells all of the stepsss
sk8mafiay8 9 months ago
If you have a Mac Maple is an awesome program (though it is pricey) I don't know what you could use for a windows
ladyannabug 9 months ago
First 100% ever! tnx so much
ilovmc 10 months ago
Thank you very much sir i appreciate you for taking the time to do this. Helped so much with an upcoming test!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MArioLugiForTheWin 10 months ago
thx man i couldnt find this stuff even in my algebra book. i almost ripped my math homework to shreds and blamed it on my sister :)
PainBringer6 11 months ago
@PainBringer6 ha, be nice to your sister
patrickJMT 11 months ago
Thanks...I almost threw my math book into the fireplace.
thegreasytoothpick 11 months ago
thnx soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much it took me 2 weeks to understand graphing but yuh helped me learn in 5 minutes lol
youngreckless97 1 year ago
thanks dude you hept me alot
itsdasupermario 1 year ago
How would you solve,
DIRECTIONS:Decide wether the orderd pair is a solution of the system of linear equations.
Oderd Pair: (-2,4)
4x+y=-4
All I no so far is 4(-2)+4=-4
PLZ HELP ME!!!! :(
LuckyGirl931 1 year ago
@LuckyGirl931 okay your on the right track no worries! lol since you have 4(-2)+4=-4........all you do is solve 4(-2)which= -8 so -8+4=-4 :) there was nuthin to it lol
sallysue98t 1 year ago
I love how you make these lessons clear and straight forward. Thankyou. I just coulden't help that you use a lot of paper. Grrrrr. >=( Haha.
IzzyHeartsTrivium 1 year ago
THNX SOOO MUCH!!! i get it for onceee!!!
squinkgrl 1 year ago
I hate bad college textbooks that don't explain anything but cost an arm. I love great YouTube videos that explain everything in clear terms and cost nothing. <3
TeamWayfarer 1 year ago 14
@TeamWayfarer totally. i use an algebra book and it tells me nothing, yet this video let me finish my math homework. youtube is great
PainBringer6 11 months ago
what if your equations are the same when you put them in y=mx+b like with this set
3=4y+x
4y=-x+3
brunettehaley 1 year ago
if i had to solve for y, then would i use elimination or substitution, or what?? im sooo confused about it! :D
BieberrFeverrr 1 year ago
@BieberrFeverrr you could use either method; both produce the same answer so take your pick
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT
ohh thank you so much! :) you're an angel!!!!
BieberrFeverrr 1 year ago
Thanks Patrick! This is probably the 4th video I have watched by you and all of them have helped very much. Keep up the good work, I'll keep watching!
fupamaster22 1 year ago
@fupamaster22 i hope you find them all useful. now go watch all 720 of the others!
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT patrick im still confused help me i think im just being slow!
jibbinjohn 1 year ago
wished u had this 1 month ago XD
comatarmsFTW 1 year ago
Can you post a vid on how to solve systems of linear differential equations using jordan normal form? More specifically though would be when the matrix isn't easily put into jordan normal form (as in you cant easily find M for A=MJM^-1)
Roywood1 1 year ago
you can't solve more than 2 equations on a piece of paper... this method is useless really
Dice3000 1 year ago
being able to find a geometrical connection is never useless, imo at least.
i would argue that it is, in fact, super useful
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT ofcourse you could solve a system of 3 equations in a 3D space but that would be a waste of time. How do you solve 3+ equations using this method ?
For linear equations Gauss method is the best imo.
Dice3000 1 year ago
PATRICK! i love your video's your great...
but please, please, PLEASE!!! post a video on limits based on the epsilon-delta definition.... CUZ THAT BITCH BE CRAZY!!!!!
Phibins 1 year ago 6
yo g slice
that is why i have not done it yet
everyone will give me one star, cause it is just so off the hook
patrickJMT 1 year ago
dang dawg u just dropped it like its hot
pabloMTv 1 year ago
Even though I'm done with my Algebra, I like checking out your videos as a sort of refresher. Not to mention the fact they helped me through the course by making sense of the class/book explanations.
bdub24j 1 year ago
Very nice explanation, as always. Keep up the awesome work Patrick.
dudemanpp 1 year ago
There's three, right?
Matrices, Substitution, and Graphing?
TheDuskMar 1 year ago
ya, elimination by addition (which is in essence, the matrix idea)
patrickJMT 1 year ago
Remember that matrices can do a lot more than just hold some linear equations. The particular algorithm for solving these systems with matrices is called Gaussian Elimination.
thefringthing 1 year ago
I didn't get 2:18 where you put "y" to both sides. I wonder why you put "y" on both sides?
keanoscarermitano619 1 year ago
He put "y on both sides" so he could get y on the other side of the equation to isolate it. He added y to both sides so the y on the left would cancel out to 0 and there would be a +y on the right. He most likely moved the y instead of the 5x so he could keep y positive and not have to multiply the entire equation by -1 to get +y = 5x-6 at the end.
numba1playa232 1 year ago
yep, thanks numba! could not have said it better
patrickJMT 1 year ago
you're welcome, keep up the good work.
numba1playa232 1 year ago
I thought 5x would go across x not up y?
pitchwest 1 year ago
well, a line with positive slope (that is , the line with equation y = 5x - 6) has a slope of 5. a line with positive slope goes up and you move left to right
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT sweet thanks
pitchwest 1 year ago
@pitchwest yeah, always just think that for slope, it's "Rise / Run" or "Rise over run" or "y / x"... maybe they should be delta y and delta x for that last pneumonic. So rise refers to the y-axis and run refers to the x axis.
Cathode0 1 year ago