Added: 7 months ago
From: RallisP
Views: 52,578
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,506)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This guys a fucking faggot.

  • i know the reason "dream house" trailer ... cause in the end theres a girl saying everyone that lives in this house dies wtf they already told tha movie

  • i should slap u dude justin timberlake was always a actor have u ever seen love guru

  • @TheKnightWatcher ..its good to make movies based of the stories of some of thee super heroes..like spiderman, superman, or batman..i liked those movies too i still like them..but enough is enough.i mean.thor.iron man ( first one was a good movie but the second..TOO MUCH!), the hulk, green lantern, captain america, and now the fridgin avengers!?!? i mean..i think you cant see my point of view..WE ALREADY FELT THE EPICNESS OF THOSE MOMENTS...we dont need to feel it again in a cinematic form....

  • The first person sequence in spider-man looks terrible in 2D but I saw the trailer in theatres in 3D and it was incredible. It felt like a roller coaster ride.

  • I knew I wasn't the only one who saw the similarities to "Mirror's Edge".

  • @ThatAtheistLiberal Saw that too, you know the "real reason" for the "Lizard" right or why they decided to use him; an as for the title... Its a fake!

  • you crack me up

  • Fuck off! the spiderman's firrst person mode was brilliant! and comparing it wiht Mirror's edge( which is a great game) is retarded! wow some of your opinions are just plain stupid!

  • MOTHERFUCKER GO KILL YOURSELF PARANORMAL ACTIVITY GOD DAMMIT

  • WE ARE ALL tired of comic movies.nowadays there are almost no movies with an original story, original characters and events like..star wars, even harry potter, although its made after a book, its kinda different, cause it doesnt copy the visual designs from the book, because there are no visual things in it..so its kinda a harder job to do a movie after a book than to do it after a comic..if we are honest with ourselves, we must admit that comic movies are RUINING the esence of COMIC experience

  • @snitelvienez in what way is it ruining the comic experience when the comics are still the same, they won't change. n everyone is not tired of these movies considering how much money they make. look at batman and spiderman they are good movies, and there will always be original movies and movies based off of things who cares whats so bad about that?

  • I can't wait for Spiderman

  • the spider man thing works becase the tralier is in 3d and in 3d its perrty epic

  • Love all your videos, well made and funny! 

  • mirror's edge is a very good video game, you can go suck a cock you pessimistic douche bag.

  • i dont know bout you guys but im tired of them coming out with comic movies, if we all remember batman begins sucked, darknight was good, so we've got a 50 50 chance with rises, but looking at the photos of catwomen and bane it looks bad, green lantern was bad, xmen movies are just coming out back to back now which i thought origins was bad but thats just me, captain america i never saw it so next they're re making spiderman which as we can see doesnt look that good, and superman

  • insult society for allowing Timberlake to act, then proceed to praise the trailer for his new film...ok.

  • Wow, people need to stop and think before saying that reboting spider-man is a bad idea...

    This guys doesn't even try to understand... and fuck you for saying "some stupid video game idea". If you had a decent IQ you would realize that's problably just for the trailer, and even if it isn't, at least they are trying something new... THAT'S WHY IT'S A REBOOT...

  • @HaloCharisma TOTALLY agree dude

    .. i mean the first person thing isn´t bad ....but it isn´t the perfect thing either... i like it ...itts new and cool so fuck youu peter

  • @mr4nerdy agreed

  • @HaloCharisma It's also a reboot because they can't tie the old spider man to the new avengers movie

  • completely agree with your comments on the whole spiderman reboot...

  • Do you understand thats a teaser trailer you pessimistic douche

  • @DieEasily98 thanks bud.

  • shity trailer for spider-man .... i expect an even shitier movie :)

    

  • whos gonna be the villian for the wolverine movie???

  • works

    

  • I didn't mind the 1st person view. I thought it was funny in an amusing way but my friend who sat next to me hated it. Look, there's a 98% chance that this sequence is not gonna be in the actual movie, as for the movie itself...Well, we all know that nothing can top Spiderman 3's Bullshit, so why's everyone already hopping on the "Hate Spidey Remake" bandwagon? It's like in Doctor Who when David Tennant left and fans started shitting on Matt Smith. You didn't even give the poor guy a chance yet!

  • it was horrible and this whole spiderman reboot is the worst idea ever...ok not ever but it's up there with abortion....just sayin.

  • @jaycore21 haha abortion isnt bad lol :D

  • @jokubas1234 it is if they are anything like me and use a coat hanger to do it...

  • i liked everything in the trailer before the lame first person shit... i like how it looks more dramatic and realistic than the first franchise. it would be worse to copy the same exact ways of the first one so i think its better to create a different way of telling the story....

    but seriously... tht first person shit just lost me

  • Peter Jackson does J.R.R Tolkien's books justice.

  • I agree its a bit lame and cheesy but I think it actually does also work just because that is one of those things that everyone would have wondered would feel like; being spider man, (being able to jump off of a building with no fear)

  • This video has been added to your Favorites.

  • You dislike this video. Thanks for the feedback!

  • works .. . its awesome..

  • i like the 1st person view. i felt goose bumps

  • I totally agree with what you said about spiderman!!!

  • How? how is KNOWING the Silver Samurai is the villain a Spoiler? Everyone knew it was going to be the Silver Samurai! So Shut the fuck up people that thinks that's a spoiler!

  • works just for the trailer, not for the movie...

  • i liked the first person and you should try that game its acctualy very good its called mirrors edge

  • it's sooooo bad, I liked the trailer acually, storywise, but that was just.. no...

  • 1st person MAYBE in imax 3D, otherwise pointless.

  • I think that for the sake of the trailer, it was a pretty cool. But if they include first person sequences in the movie, it would be pretty dumb. yah dig?

  • pepole need to stop complaining this is how spiderman should be its more like the comics. Pepole need to just chill cause at the end of the day everybodys going to go see it

  • on gaming i like first person, no doubt. but i think its just wierd to put it in a movie because u cant even see his costume fully besides like a 2 second spot at the end. its just bull. i dont like it.

  • As a gamer, I can't seem to find much to complain about with the trailer sequence. Honestly, with how poorly videos games usually end up represented in film, it's actually kind of nice to see something in a film that is reminiscent of a video game that isn't complete garbage. Of course, now we can just assume that any movie tie in game that is created because of this film will probably still be rubbish.

  • I thought the Spider-man thing was pointless and a knock-off of Mirror's Edge, so no, I didn't like it at all!

  • Did you just call Mirror's Edge "stupid"?

  • CHECK VIDEO RESPONSES (GRAVITY IS NOW AWARE OF YOUR DEEDS) (IM ON YOUR SIDE DUDE!) (BRITISH COMPANIES ARE STEALING FROM AMERICAN ACTORS)

  • It was well done and I enjoyed that scene

  • Justin Timberlake's doing what he can to secure his future cuz n'sync didn't work so unlike the others he's taking advantage of the idea mad props justin.

  • @JWUniverse He made shit loads of money as a solo artist. So it cant be the N'sync thing

  • spiderman thing is cheap and somewhat of a cop out but interesting for sure

  • The Seyfried/Timberlake sounds a bit like Logan's Run.

  • Are People stupid? This is a reboot but it follows the comic more and it will be diffrent and why the fuck are people complaining that one scene is in first person what the fuck?!? People need to get there shit together

  • Listen not a hater just saying that to insinuate that Spider-Man is childish because it has a 1st person shot like video games is rude.Video games are an entertainment medium like T.V. and music. So please show a little bit of respect to gamers cause I'm 20 and love games do I seem childish. Besides every Spider-Man game has been 3rd person 1st person games are more like Call of Duty.

  • No. Rebooting spider man was a bad idea.

    Just make a mirrors edge movie. that would be way cooler.

    or even a sequel to the game. come on people!!!

  • I like the POV shot in the ASM trailer. It was even COOLER when I saw it in 3D before Capt. Amer.!!!  Pete you need to get your head checked. You love Transformers 2 but have a problem w/ this? REALLY!?!?!?

  • i new it would be the Silver Samurai

  • its gay

  • wtf is the avengers trailer

  • Comic Book Nerds

  • I think it could work, but at this stage it looked very fake/not fully rendered, and just didnt help the trailer

  • haha then the next reboot of spiderman he gets bit in the ASS!

  • Comment removed

  • NOPE

    

  • It works, I don't think it's going to be a perspective were going to see in the movie, It's more of a little sequence to try and hype up to the final full costume reveal at the end of the trailer.

    And it instantly reminded me of mirrors edge too.

  • it works

  • i can see what they were trying to do, being a reboot is tough enough so trying to be original doesn't hurt

  • Spiderman trailer looks good to me. The POV shot I dont think that the whole movie is going to be like that. I think thats just probally one scene. and as for the CGI it looks kinda bad. but you have to think that this movie is a year away. so they have alot of time to get the CGI better and other things that are not good up to par. other than that. I cant wait for this movie to come out. well I kinda can cuz if it came out now. id be kinda crappy =D

  • @comicguy12 , yeah i could see that as well, or maybe right after he gets his suit or something. Not sure why there is so much hate surrounding this trailer

  • WAKE UP PETE, YOU ARE AMERICAN NOT EUPROPEAN!!! (DUMBASS!)

  • Spiderman Trailer Breakdown & Orgies (ep. 358)

    From: RallisP  | Jul 22, 2011 | 37,297 views

    You dislike this video. Thanks for the feedback!

    Ratings for this video (991 total)

  • it does not work

    it doesn't work for shit

  • the trailer looks incredible.

  • works

  • For me it kinda worked, it's fun. In the cinema it will look even better.

  • I think it works, is fun to watch

  • Didn't like it at all.

  • The SM trailer is good, and if you knew anything about the production of the film you would know that Sony was going for a completely different direction for the franchise, free of camp and more character focused. Admittedly the First-Person POV at the end did look a little on the low end of CGI, but its a teaser, there is still plenty of work to be done on the film. And they will be visiting OsCorp and presumably the Goblin story line, soooo clearly the franchise did need a reboot, not a sequel

  • I didnt like it, it broke the curiousity of the movie, and made me wonder if they were just copying mirrors edge.

  • I liked the trailer..

  • I DO NOT understand the hate for this spiderman movie, I think it looks like fun and I'm probably going to enjoy it.

  • ITS ONLY FOR THE TRAILER! its not going to be a major part of the film! plus the spiderman comics hav been rebooted lots of times! personally i didnt like the original trilogy, toby mcguire was an AWFUL peter parker tbh

  • For me After the Comic-Con speech, It WORKS for me.

  • Doesn't work as it does look like a video game and with cgi you could do anything these days. I would have been impressed if they somehow filmed real places and used a camera mounted on an rc plane so you get the real sense of danger jumping across all those heights

  • I thought it was cool

  • MIRRORS SPIDER/!!!!!!!!!

    

  • okay, it maight have worked if it didnt scream out "MIRROR'S EDGE" so the fps sequence ist really working for me, if i want an fps i'll play a video game

  • actually the first person idea might be a great idea since the movie is shot in 3d, it could actually be fucking awesom, however they can only do it once maybe twice, more than that will fucking suck

  • Doesnt work

  • i saw the trailer for the movie "in time" when i saw fast 5 . i wanna see it. it seems really badass

  • Dude the Spideman franchise/comicbook/story has been rebooted hundreds of times, why bitch about it now. I'm going to sit in the theatre with my popcorn and say, "Yup thats a bit different."

  • Looks good for a video game, but for a film it looks like ass

  • i also thought it was like a video game. it reminded me of crysis 2. the whole glass and rooftop thing. but bad cgi.

  • The way he said stupid when mentioning Mirror's Edge, I was praying he did NOT mean Mirror's Edge was stupid. It's a very good game, and I don't appreciate him calling it childish because it's like a video game. Video games are an art, too.

  • Does not work, and justin timberlake is a shitty actor!!

  • wtf u cant see the trailer

  • i think the original were more or less true to the comics but the new one seems as if it want to be more realist, but the 1fist person part did look cool and i think i would look even better in 3D.

  • hey i like jt hes funny watch him on snl

  • NOO!! IT DOESN'T WORK!!!!!

  • it sucks

  • It works....in 3D.

  • Stupid

    It was only cool when we saw his reflection

  • It looks stupid!

  • it works. seperates itself from the trilogy very well, which is very necessary after the shitstorm that was spiderman 3

  • it works but needs to look more realistic, instead of all cgi just have some guy with a camera on his head actually run around for some of it

  • It might actually work really well if you where watching it n 3D which what i think the idea behind that sequence is.

    That's actually really cool idea as there is nothing done yet in first person in 3d.

  • fucking stupid

  • Works! I loved it.

  • Thanks for NOT Picking Me for the USB! 

  • NOT WORK

    

  • Spider man reboot going to be a Fail

  • Looks ridiculously fake and lame.

  • Or it could affect people negatively and inspire a feeling of immaturity, like someone thinking that it is a childish form of entertainment. Having spoken my thoughts I would like to conclude with a fact. People are attracted to first person video games because they feel more in tune with the characters thoughts feelings and actions, and so it could go either way

  • In my opinion, I quite enjoyed the first person sequence. It is an entertaining element in the trailer and has an interesting property. In my psychological opinion there are two ways it could go, it could positively affect people and inspires a sort of spark of interest in people. They see the sequence and think in terms of an interesting fantasy such as : what the life of this new spider-man is like; that could possibly attract people to the movie.

  • first person view is horrible! If i want to view stuff that way i will just play mirrors edge

  • Wait.. Just wanted to say one more thing. As much as I am exited for the reboot next year..I am sharply disappointed that they have to start over from the beginning...BUT I also think its a good idea because the old trilogy was horrid :) Good day to you all!

  • That first person is bad ass

  • I think it's kinda neat to see through his eyes, maybe a great concept for a 3D movie, could make it fun to watch.

  • Just reminding you Rallis before you give out your new vid today...you suck at reviewing things. You said it yourself man, comparing a movie to a video game is CHILDISH. The first person view really it works, its just like the comics. Thats what they were aiming for. Like I said before..unless you haven't read the comics..you're not going to like this reboot because fans are to used to the Sam Rammi films and think they are "original".

  • I thought the first person aka Point of View aka POV shots were cool. We'd all love to be the web slinger, right? What better way to show it! The mirror's edge controversy, now that's something to kick a fuss about. I don't think the film's trying to be a computer game, though (which you're arguing). Did you see any HUD?

  • Ok, first of all it was just a teaser trailer. I am sure the actual movie will not be in 1st person you dumbass. This teaser trailer showed a lot more of the movie than the Dark Knight Rises Trailer. Secondly, this film looks a lot darker than the original trilogy and I think that is a good thing because Spider-Man is a very complicated character. Lastly, this movie is going to be more accurate to the comic books which is also a good thing so stop pretending you know what you are talking about.

  • sheeeeeeeeet

  • the first person thing would be really fun to see on the big screen. There should have been more or that in the first movie instead of being some horrible love story.

  • not work!!

  • I don't think thats part of the movie. I think they were just doing it for the trailer. But know your write it wouldn't work in the movie

  • I agree with you on The Amazing Spiderman, but "In-Time is an original Sci-Fi story"? haven't you ever heard of Logan's Run? it's basically the same story and theme, it's nothing more that a mirror mirror concept, or reversal of the story.

    In-Time is about original of a story as West Side Story was, a.k.a (Romeo and Juliette).

  • loved it.

  • i think it looks cool if they dont over use it

  • SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • i agree with the 1st person stuff, it looks rubbish and cheap, hope its only in the trailer.

  • Regarding "Dream House" Trailer: "If they give away the twist... it's not the real twist. You'll see." I hope you're right, otherwise everyone else giving negative comments on how completely idiotic it is to give the major plot twist in a trailer is right. Or... instead of movie trailers showing the best parts of a movie, they'll now start showing the best parts of the movie PLUS the major plot twist, but somehow the movie industry will still thrive...

  • yeah ehhhhh it's ok better not be in the movie though

  • the new spiderman looks waaaayyy better, tobey maguire's acting is bullshit

  • only works in the trailer, as it kinda showcases the slightly different feel they're going for with his movement, less just swinging around and more actual spider-style crawling. also, how could you not mention the fact he now actually uses web slingers instead of just growing the web!? plus, justin timberlake has been an actor since 2005, and is actually pretty decent in both alpha dog and southland tales....

  • i like that it was in the trailer but hope its not in the movie

  • man i didnt think it looked that bad..

  • Suckkkssssss

  • Really does not work!

  • I am so glad I didn't see this or the last video before watching captain america. The post-credits scene has always been a surprise, why on earth are you talking about it like it's no big deal? This is opening weekend damnit.

  • SUCKS BALLLS! Take it out, its so cheap and degrading.

  • your a faggot.. you even talk like one -.-'

  • At first i was very skeptical... then i saw it in 3D.

    i was like ' weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee' xD

  • not work!

  • I thought it was cool looking honestly :P

  • Everyone is talking shit on this movie just like they did with pretty much any movie that had 1 bad teaser trailer. Watch it, then give your comments. watch when the movie comes out RallisP is going to act totally different towards it. Guaran-fucking-teen.

  • Idk, im probly gona be the only person saying this but... i thought the first person was pretty cool, just as a part of the trailer to get your attention.

  • The whole thing is completely zanny, I think they portray peter parker slightly the wrong way and the only reason they do that stupid first- person scene at the end of it was to push the fact that the film is gonna be in 3-D. And why the hell didn't they show what the Lizard looks like!

  • @10Jmccabe the movie is coming out NEXT YEAR. theyre not done with the CG yet. and if you were following the movie you'd know that at comic con footage was shown of the lizard and the lizard looked similar to the steve ditko lizard.

  • i don't see why that had to basically reboot the movie and then throw in a different villain thats my 2 cents and that first person shooter then cool i guess if i was in theaters already watching a 3D movie cause that would be pretty cool but other then that it is the most useless moment ever

  • @XmansonmearX im so glad they're remaking them! i liked the first 2 the 3rd was trash but it always bugged me how far off the story was to the original.

  • @myARTjournal I do agree that the second one and third one were really bad but to reboot everything seems kind of extreme but thats my opinion

  • New spiderman movie looks like it sucks.

  • Comment removed

  • It is utter crap.

  • Works!

  • everybody. avengers trailer is after captain america movie. and i mean like not teaser like action.

  • no i think it sucks.

  • NO ITS REALLY STUPID!

  • it looks like they tryn ta take a dark knight twist to it but the first person graphics are no better  than my ps3 games and that seems to be the let down..

  • don't work!

  • it works

  • i think it looks awesome!

  • looks cheesy

  • why the fuck id they have to fucking reboot it thats so stupid i loved the old movies and i think this ones gunna suck

  • watch closely the first person mode, (pause it at his boots, its actually his head) (aka cheap trick)