In 1991, Faurisson was removed from his university chair on the basis of his views under the Gayssot Act, a French statute passed in 1990 that prohibited Holocaust denial.
Faurisson has been debunked by his own assistant. Anyone is qualified to Google the man and come to their own conclusions. What qualifications would you require people to have in order to investigate the man? He has to defend his own outrageous claims. No reputable historians support him only neo nazis and white supremacists. This is an issue involving history not literature. A fact you apparently overlook quite easily.
@AgouraMo , Faurisson had impeccable credentials. He was over-qualified according to the Zundel trial transcripts. If he wasn't "credible", do u think B'nai B'rith wouldve spent millions on Zundels Toronto trial that had world media coverage? The yid media would've screamed about this from wks! You're either lying or a disinfo troll. Was Helen Thomas disreputable? She had 50 yrs experience at the highest levels. But as soon as she criticized Israel, she suddenly lost credibility?
après avoir marqué comme spam les commentaire de thomaslu7, j'ai remarqué que cela faisait un an qu'il avait pris ses reves de domination de nos pensées pour la réalité...
maintenant le mythe est évident. chaque négation des recherches des révisionistes les fortifie. et c'est tant mieux.
5* Vive Monsieur Faurisson et ses confrères vive le révisionnisme historique.
A mort les mythes. car nous sommes tous anti ces mythes.
Cette vidéo est contraire aux articles 23, 24 bis et 42 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881. Je vous prie de retirer cette vidéo (peine encourue 1 an d'emprisonnement et 45.OOO Euros d'amende)
Les articles 23, 24 bis et 42 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 est contre la liberté d'epxression. Je vous prie de fermer votre gueule et d'aller faire chier votre monde ailleurs, merci.
EX....repeat EX-Professor Faurisson. A disgraced academic with no background in history at all. He should teach hate mongering ...something he knows.
AgouraMo 2 years ago
In 1991, Faurisson was removed from his university chair on the basis of his views under the Gayssot Act, a French statute passed in 1990 that prohibited Holocaust denial.
ReinholdElstner 2 years ago 3
Please do tell us what your qualifications are.
ReinholdElstner 2 years ago 3
Faurisson has been debunked by his own assistant. Anyone is qualified to Google the man and come to their own conclusions. What qualifications would you require people to have in order to investigate the man? He has to defend his own outrageous claims. No reputable historians support him only neo nazis and white supremacists. This is an issue involving history not literature. A fact you apparently overlook quite easily.
AgouraMo 2 years ago
@AgouraMo , Faurisson had impeccable credentials. He was over-qualified according to the Zundel trial transcripts. If he wasn't "credible", do u think B'nai B'rith wouldve spent millions on Zundels Toronto trial that had world media coverage? The yid media would've screamed about this from wks! You're either lying or a disinfo troll. Was Helen Thomas disreputable? She had 50 yrs experience at the highest levels. But as soon as she criticized Israel, she suddenly lost credibility?
GrassyKnollTrolls 1 month ago in playlist More videos from RevisionistsRus
Faurisson is a hero. It really requires bravery to speak the truth about the holohoax openly.
ONLY LIES REQUIRES THE PROTECTION OF LAWS.
ThoughtCriminal911 2 years ago 3
après avoir marqué comme spam les commentaire de thomaslu7, j'ai remarqué que cela faisait un an qu'il avait pris ses reves de domination de nos pensées pour la réalité...
maintenant le mythe est évident. chaque négation des recherches des révisionistes les fortifie. et c'est tant mieux.
5* Vive Monsieur Faurisson et ses confrères vive le révisionnisme historique.
A mort les mythes. car nous sommes tous anti ces mythes.
gavroche2009 2 years ago
COmmentaire du lundi 19 novembre, 12heures 43. J'ai envoyé il y a 16 minutes un commentaire. Je vous prie de retirer cette vidéo contraire à la loi
thomaslu7 4 years ago
I only understand English.
RevisionistsRus 4 years ago
please only English
RevisionistsRus 4 years ago
peut etre pas à la loi américaine qui permet plus de libertés d'opinion et d'expression garanties par le premier Amendement.
Youtube est un site Américain sous le coup de la loi Américaine.
heramoth 4 years ago
Cette vidéo est contraire aux articles 23, 24 bis et 42 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881. Je vous prie de retirer cette vidéo (peine encourue 1 an d'emprisonnement et 45.OOO Euros d'amende)
thomaslu7 4 years ago
Les articles 23, 24 bis et 42 de la loi du 29 juillet 1881 est contre la liberté d'epxression. Je vous prie de fermer votre gueule et d'aller faire chier votre monde ailleurs, merci.
litia 4 years ago