NASA's restored video showing Buzz Aldrin descending onto the moon's surface

[AcePilot101]

Earth to lunatic conspirators: Russia would have screamed "fake" if the USA had NOT landed on the moon. Think about it.

[echozgus]

@AcePilot101 yeah!!! you are right!!!

[TheNitschke22]

Ok theres some real dumb comments below... some people just need to think before writing this crap.

I do believe NASA did get to the moon and there is no conspiracy... but what i dont under stand is why the astronaut is somewhat transparent. You can see shadows and the horizon through the astronaut. :/

[velmidobryferko]

its true video i sawed it in news that australia technology restored video of nasa 1st landing on moon its true who believe thumbs up

[samgeo]

watch the bright light in the middle of this film, yet the shadows are pointing perpendicular to the source of light.. impossible.. but possibly FAKE videooooo..

[samgeo]

Major FAKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.....

[loyxvlc]

This is as fake as the reasons to go war against Irak.... NASA technology in the 1960's wasn't up to the task of a real Moon landing. Instead, anxious to win the Space Race any way it could, NASA acted out the Apollo program in movie studios. My question is: why NASA still didn't return??? With today's technologies would be 1000 times easier , uh?

[eL3ctr1c4L]

couse there's nothing to see/study on the moon.

there are other places that need searching and research

[TheJomogogo]

derrr.......OH HOLY SHIT THERE'S NO STARS IT MUST BE FAKE LOLOL.

Douchebag.

[jugmongers]

Howdy! To all ye conspirators: I suppose y'all think the moon is made a cheeze too, don'tcha? - Judd Jugmonger

[ehack87]

Looking forward to the rest.

[johnnylightning258]

We dont fake life altering achievements, I think people like to call it fake because its almost impossible to fathom going to another world. Its also the same people who've flunked school, never have any hopes or goals and life and shunt others that go far in life.

[poshko41]

Exactly. They're just like any other conspiracy theorist. If no conclusive evidence exists discounting the event as we've seen it, why would you choose to believe so unwaveringly that it didn't happen? It's obvious these people have a lot of personal problems.

[sup5000]

how can u say this is fake. then where else can u film this that doesnt have any gravity thats close to earth? do u see how they are bouncing n how the flag is standin straight up unlike any flag on earth. theyre on the moon. n light reflects off the moon which makes the video seem like there is a second lighting besides the sun. well there is bcus of the way light is reflecting off the moon thats y it isnt completely dark on the shadow of the lunar module

[sel36]

FUAROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[zigyzigy13]

FAKE

[jerrylambert]

terrible restoration, looks like they used the photoshop blur tool a little too much. it's all FAKE! lol

[calangodoido]

Man...coming from an american, this is the fakest thing Ive EVER seen! I bet you they were in Texas somewhere...haha

[MentalRob]

Seems the older version has better contrast between the lights and darks. oh... and why can we see through him?? weird

[julittok]

That's what i thought

[InsideLosAngeles]

Moon landing is real, no question about it. NASA losing the footage to this, highly questionable. HAHA

[masche14]

Esto tiene mas photoshop que la cara de Mirtha Legrand

[Greenvalds]

moon has earths gravity? lol

[S0vereignty]

I like the archived version better. The 2009 version is too blurry.

[adsert]

I agree

[loyxvlc]

FAKE

[Sam13lfc]

Prove it's fake then, loyxvlc, go on enlighten us.

[loyxvlc]

Notice the silhouette of Aldrin! It's almost transparent!!! FAAAKEEEEE

lol

[Sam13lfc]

Ya. Do you really think cameras in 1969 were any good? And consider that this was taken on the Moon, 250,000 miles away, so ofcourse it's not going to look crystal clear is it?

[loyxvlc]

It seems that the video owner is deleting my replies. Ok, one more time... WHY IS THE SILHOUETTE TRANSPARENT? It's not the camera... its the special effects of the 60's man...

[Sam13lfc]

Prove that there's special effects. You can't. But what I'm saying about the cameras being low-tech, and 250,000 miles away, is correct. The bright light from the moon is making the image of Aldrin very transparent.

[gobblegobblechew]

that camera is not low tech...its a Hassleblad, the worlds finest cameras, mated with the finest lenses. The glass in those lenses are of the highest quality even by today's standards. There is nothing wrong with their cameras.

[Sam13lfc]

But it's filming from 250,000 miles away...which makes it a tad harder to get the best visual.

[gobblegobblechew]

@ sam

 I posted a comment on my comment.

[gobblegobblechew]

although the frame rate is poor, which is why you have a ghosting effect. This is not some sort of proof this is a fake. The only time he is transparent is when he is moving. He becomes more solid the less he moves. Thats why everything else in the footage is solid, like the ship and ladder.

[gobblegobblechew]

@ loyxvlc this is not a fake. Ghosting can happen when you have poor frame rates. Notice how he becomes more solid the less he moves. look at 0:29 the more he moves the more he becomes transparent.

[pbill23]

we need to go back to the moon/mars and beyond.

that is our manifest destiny...

[ukfirebird]

wow, what a difference, so much more detail, cant wait until september to see it all

[Keystone1111]

Amazing!