The CIT Deception - Supplemental Material

[SkadiTheElf]

Nice to see someone taking the time to call out these idiots on their bullshit. Most 9/11 truthers make me laugh, but CIT borders on the downright creepy and obsessive. Not to mention eye-rolling ridiculous. Kudos, it's been a pleasure to watch this series.

[brokenstyx]

@tpgphotog

so you think a plane impacting a reinforced wall should leave it undamaged? ok!

[nickachief]

every time i think i have a better picture of what took place that day someone like yourself comes & smashes my reality into pieces, i total bought the cit verdict of events, but now i'm back to wondering where did the plane go ? i don't know how it could go through such a small hole, & no engine damage to the wall ?  thank-you for doing this series v.interesting. .. have you tried resistance radio you would be an interesting guest .. many thanks

[brokenstyx]

@nickachief

Thanks :) The building is incredibly big, and was reinforced against missile attack, so its reasonable to assume the plane would largely disintegrate on impact. The engines definitely made holes, , but then we mostly didn't have experience of those sorts of collisions before 911. Google search a video called Sandia F4 Test where they slam a fighter into a reinforced wall at 500mph.

I'd love to be a guest, i'll look them up - and thanks for watching!

[thumminxy]

I know that tune! Oh happy days!

[abaguley25]

this is all crap there is more people that support CIT then u. i would trust them with everything

[brokenstyx]

@abaguley25

feel free to follow the herd :) they're making fools of you though.

[TheFlyposter]

on 911forumorguk someone posted in the critics section, the CIT vid, asking what critics of the conspiracists think of the vid. A Twoofer posted your vid response with the come back "brokenstyx seems shady" .

Lol, join the club mate, apparently I am a spook too.

[TheFlyposter]

excellent, thanks! The CIT films are compelling watching, even though I knew they were b.s. I knew they were up to something with the angles of the photo's... Some proper Derren Brown Shit there, lot's of prompting.

gonna have a look at the rest of your vids. I unfortunately have freinds and an ex who have become Twoofers.

[brokenstyx]

@TheFlyposter

thanks for the nice comments flyposter, much obliged.

i'd probably consider myself a truther, except truther now means someone who isn't interested in the truth, only theories that have zero evidence lol

[bumblebee8banana]

CIT is 100% garbage.

citwatch . blogspot . com

[Bernadotte01]

An excellent exposure of CIT methodology from start to finish - the best work I have seen on the topic so far, in fact.

Much appreciated.

[brokenstyx]

@Bernadotte01

woah.

thanks a lot bernadotte - much appreciated

:)

[accidentsinspace]

That is the wrong answer and comeback Mr Brokenstyxandbones. You are the one making a fucking dick out of yourself by making half assed videos that keep peoples' minds stationary and locked. All you are doing is subconsciously reading fron an NWO script. The perps created 9/11 Truth ffs. Watch 'Setember Clues' and learn something. I am trying to wake you up. Stop being an NWO bitch. Take it or leave it.

[brokenstyx]

september clues fakes its own evidence.

i have a video on it in my Uploads section.

[jeodreamer]

Great in depth analysis of this.

I'm still curious of CIT's motivations...I would be interested to see something else on here about their background and reasoning...money seems likely but not sure it would be profitable enough.

Good work - has definitely got me thinking!

[jeodreamer]

Clearly there are many obvious reasons to why the deception - more research into this aspect would certainly be interesting.

[brokenstyx]

yes, it would, but it might be slanderous, so its worth treading carefully on this aspect.

the likeliest explanation is they are deluded truthers, so desperate to be the ones who solved 911 that they have lost any standards or morals they ever had.

i doubt they are undercover reporters. the scale of their work seems too great.

and i think they're too public to be govt disinfo.

but they're definitely disinfo, they definitely know it, and they definitely don't care!

thanks for watching :)

[camstwin]

Well done Brokenstyx. Great videos. "The CIT Deception"..? Ain't that the truth.

[brokenstyx]

thanks cam - much appreciated

[johnbursill]

Thanks for your help with taking another look at CIT!

Regards John

[brokenstyx]

@johnbursill

thanks for watching!

[brokenstyx]

@stewungar

yehp.

lagasse is definitely one of the most qualified witnesses. as is sean boger.

[YougeneDebs]

I watched all 5 parts, and I'm glad I did!

Very good job, sticks!

[brokenstyx]

@YougeneDebs

thanks debs.

lets hope it stops before the mainstream media get hold of CIT's claims....

[genghis6l99]

lol he didn't draw the dot. and nobody was buried on 911. it takes a week to bury people even if they find the body. and google earth does not label light poles. and do you even know what reneg means you fukkin moron?

[punxsutawneybarney]

@genghis6l99 Keith Wheelhouse was in Arlington cemetery burying his brother-in-law when the plane flew over. His brother-in-law did not die on 9/11.

Google earth does not label light poles, you're right. Brokenstyx did not say they do. He just used google-earth to drive up highway 27 to point out where the light pole is. CIT mislabeled the pole in their picture, as styx pointed out.

[brokenstyx]

cheers dude

and genghis, renege, verb, to reonounce, disown.

check a dictionary - they're free online :p